skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have one, and we leave the radio on the same channel. I wake up to the same thing every morning anyway, because the radio does traffic at 7:45 every morning, and play one of a handful of songs straight after it.
I feel like that would lead to pranksters screaming, or worse playing some ridiculous pitch and frequency that could cause hearing damage.
Freenet style distributed cache and name resolution. But that would require an Internet v3.
I mean, we have this conversation thread like every third day. I'm not sure that there's anything left to be said that hasn't been beaten into the ground, over, and over, and over. Nobody is convincing anybody, we'll just yell at each other for a while. Maybe that makes some people happy.
> want them to work 100 hour weeks, maybe $500K is just too low.

I think this is the subtext.
Ok so this is "OpenShift.IO"
:) And not just openshift

This is openshift + planner + code editor + pipelines + 'analytics'.

Here analytics does code quality checks and lets you, the developer know, if they should be using a different Jar/package ( example: the one used by the developer might have a security vulnerability reported which the developer was unaware of )
This is the responsible thing to do in 2017.
> It is inevitable that more men will earn less
> than their female partners in years to come.
> To pull their weight, they will have to do
> more at home.

Will this actually work though?

Anecdotally, women seem less interested in partnering with men who make less money than them no matter what other benefits they provide.

I rarely hear of men breaking up with women because they weren't "ambitious enough" or weren't "their equals" however I hear this fairly frequently from women.

Hopefully as more women become the economic winners of their families they will fully accept the position of being the bread-winner instead of continuing to search for men that will 'be their equal' or outperform them. Until that happens men are going to continue to feel pressure to live up to outdated patriarchal ideals, with both winners and losers.
> I have absolutely no idea how anyone can manage it alone

Not alone. The State (so, everyone paying taxes) is always here to help single parents.
+ the docker engine is just a polished version of what we had for ages
It's possible that men feel unwelcome in female-dominated areas for the same reason women may in male-dominated areas: it can be intimidating to enter a group of people of the opposite sex, with their own norms and microaggressions and who feel entitled and encouraged to be there, when you have received numerous social signals that's weird for you to be there or even want to be there. Unless those people and institutions specifically welcome you in.
This "naturally/biologically" is the crux of the issue really, where does nature stop and society begin?

And even if nature biases one way or an other, does it explain the measured discrepancy completely? Am I to believe that there's basically a shortage of "nurturing" men, as there is a shortage of technically inclined women?

We also see that the proportions vary very significantly between countries, so clearly there's a societal factor at play, one way or an other.

So I don't really like these types of shortcuts, because clearly the most nurturing man is probably more so than the less nurturing woman. We should judge people on their own merit, not their gender, race or other factors.
HSIC is USB. It's an industry standard.

In modern flagship phone designs, the baseband is an adversarial component. It isn't trusted with access to AP memory. It's accessed like a peripheral.

Nobody doubts that there are vulnerabilities in baseband processors. There certainly are. What I object to is the accompanying story that an exploit in the baseband gives you unfettered access to memory on the phone. I don't know how far back you have to go for that to be the truth, but it isn't true today for flagship phones.

Nobody should minimize the importance of baseband flaws. They're very bad for the security of the phone in its cellular phone capacity. But there's a reason why an Apple phone has separate silicon for the Secure Enclave and for the encrypted memory bus it uses to access memory: it's because the components of the phone don't trust each other. Should you trust GSM? Fuck no. Are your SSH keys more secure on an iPhone than they would be on your laptop? Fuck yes.

If you must use Android, don't use random Android phones. Stick to Google's phones.
> obstinate old ops person will throw up because they'd rather keep their job comfortable than try to accommodate a need beyond their own

Oh, come on. This is why I hate Docker. Right here. It's like a heat seeking missile that looks for the friction points between engineering and operations, then explodes in a fireball of "do we really need operations? They're just old and obstinate and in the way of progress," without even really stopping to ask what progress is from the perspective of operations.

Some of us like to think of legitimate technical reasons to push back on Docker in our own circumstances and deployments (some of us even read code to help make that determination), but I suppose your dichotomy would be fun to navigate for everyone involved. I've definitely been in environments where one side characterizes operational pushback as change reticence, which immediately personalizes the discussion. That's a tough environment in which to argue, especially when you're arguing with people who will not be on call for the crap they are trying to deliver to you.

The casual ageism in your comment is, sadly, expected. I'm growing accustomed to HN considering it acceptable to go after "old" and "operations" with equal vigor, which speaks more broadly to worrying trends in our industry. I'm 31 and have devoted my career to operations, and I already have an exit plan. That should say something about the industry, and I think this comment is a fine microcosm of that.
Try out a fresh look for YouTube
It will be better conditions than those offered to the Indians, because American worker is not shackled to Infosys:

1) with a H1b visa that'll be renewed only for the duration of contract (sometimes renewed only for 6 months, but regularly)

2) with a greencard application, which means no need to obey orders of thy master / manager and nor work like a slave, just to ensure the green card application is not in jeopardy.

3) with excruciatingly long wait of greencard (for those born in India it'll soon be > 20 years wait)

4) because switching to an another employer is just as simple as signing an offer letter and filling I-9. Another company wont go through the painful H1b process

These reasons, are applicable to non-Americans too, as long as they are not born in India or China.

So, Infosys hiring Americans will definitely turn the tables against India based outsourcing companies like Infy and TCS.

But this still doesn't solve the "stealing of jobs" problem from outsourcing companies that are based in US, but have huge operations in India (HP, IBM, Accenture, EDS etc).
"they don't want to" can be expanded into a number of causal cultural factors:

- teachers, parents, advisors all too often say tech is not for women
- daughters are rarely given personal computers at the same as sons
- video games, an important gateway into programming, are primarily marketed at boys
- we have very few living role models of expert women programmers

Many of these same arguments apply to men and nursing. The primary reason we don't talk much about it in terms of access to opportunity is that comparatively, nursing is yet another underpaid pink collar job. If nursing was a comparable opportunity to tech, there'd probably be more grousing about the cultural barriers of masculinity that inhibit fuller participation.
See, there you go again. Changing your statement once more - this time to something that is so specific and twisted from reality to be meaningless, and pretending it is the same thing.

I think I'm done here; having presented real-world counterexamples, your claim, which was a gross and simplistic misrepresentation, is dead.
It's like the alarm clock version of ChatRoulette. I like it haha. That's actually a pretty cool idea, it's different enough that it could be a completely separate app.
Can you provide a link or reference to this path? I can't find much with basic searches and have given up several times on the gpg-connect-agent path while using Windows or Ubuntu. The path on Mac seems okay but on other platforms is way too difficult.
I'm inclined to side with you on this one. I took a linguistics class called Language and the Law. The takeaway was that the legal system is quite generous when interpreting language from the side of The Law, and very strict when interpreting the language of those on the other side.

I imagine you might be able to avoid the consequences of ignoring a subpoena if your lawyer was very good, and hired the right experts to testify on your behalf, but I wouldn't bet my house on it. And legal fees can easily be as much or more than a mortgage. (IANAL)

A substantial portion of the reading for the class was from Language in the Legal Process[1]. I'd highly recommend the book if you are at all interested in legal language from a linguistics standpoint.

[1] https://smile.amazon.com/Language-Legal-Process-J-Cotterill/...
The real problem is that public education for the last few decades has been focused on the college-bound student. If your background, family financial status, or academic record indicate that you are not going to college, you are a non-entity (possible exception if you are athletically gifted).

If you are not college-bound you get no real attention or guidance. You are not taught about entrepreneurship, trades, or other options that might be good for you. You are not taught about managing money, personal finance, the traps of high-interest credit debt, or anything else practical. It's assumed you'll put in your time and "graduate" (or simply drop out), get some menial job, and that's your life. Nobody spares ten seconds of thought on you if you are not college-bound.
If Mr Palmer is going to claim he'd pay 500k, I'd like to see some evidence that he is actually doing this for his top performing employees. He says he lost a few "perfect" candidates to Facebook and google. Did he offer them $500k a year?

Keep in mind, Mr Palmer chose to make this claim very publicly, and he's gotten plenty of attention at this point for doing so. So I'd love to see a good journalist follow up with some real numbers here.

If he's telling the truth, well then, good for him! I tend to be skeptical about people who claim there is a shortage, since they almost never talk about what they're offering. Mr Palmer is.

So far, so good. But he should be willing to offer some real evidence of this claim. Let's see the numbers.
Almost all the internals are matured/stable upstream projects which have been around for a while.

Openshift.IO makes all them work as a SaaS for production use.
Intel has something similar. It isn't super different from vacation but it is in addition to vacation and you can attach them for a super long one.
Aqua Data Studio 18.0.9 Crack and Serial for Mac
My i7 2600k is getting a bit long in the tooth, but I can get it to sweat by compiling yocto poky. Especially building Webkit/Chromium and Qt eats memory and cores like nothing.
That's what I do! I just download and store (but not collect!!) all those stupid Marvel comic films, just to piss off the MPAA (and for security purposes / the children). And this is fine because I don't actually watch them. Or can stand them. It's the rules, and I don't wanna break them!
Well, everybody knows that in statistics, a sample size of 1 gives you a 0 margin of error ;)
Contrast to the Common Lisp Quick Reference: http://clqr.boundp.org/
Apparently this story has been flagged. Why?
As long as your app doesn't do anything too esoteric, it's easy.

https://developer.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/bridges/deskto...
I can't say that our tests are slow. We can test our database continuously and independently from our various projects that utilize it. Our integration and smoke tests run continuously as you would expect.
I kept waiting for the punchline that gave away the piece as satire. But... it seems 100% serious.

> In practice, we could train these workers, but not at market prices with added recruiter vigorish. We just can’t get enough value out of B-team players while they are in training

Does the author realize that this is the exact cause of his "problem"? Developers live in constant fear of "if you don't stay up to date, you'll never get another job". Combine that with the generally risky venture-backed tech climate, an at-will employment culture and the zeitgeist of youth worship and blatant ageism. All I can say is: you reap what you sew.

Turn this toxic culture around so that devs can feel comfortable that being a great engineer is enough, instead of chasing frameworks and books about algorithms.
That was before inflation. Using https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCSL , it looks like the CPI was 78 in January 1980, and 244.456 in February 2017 (the most recent data currently available). Meaning that $1 from 1980 would buy as much as $3.13 last February, and $40,000 in 1980 would be equivalent to $125,362 in February. Perhaps not enough for two homes and a boat, but pretty good income in most of the US.

Then again, there are plenty of caveats: the CPI overstates inflation, there are things on the market today that no amount of money could have bought in 1980, etc.
I could post 10,000 job openings tomorrow to indeed.com for lawyers @ a very reasonable price, but this wouldn't prove there is a lawyer shortage.

A much more accurate measure of supply and demand is salaries. And runaway salary inflation has not happened. If you need a developer you can simply pay them more. This site is filled with developers willing to leave their job for a large pay bump.

And if you're not willing to pay them more, it's not a shortage, it's just a wish for cheaper labor.
> While working on Replicant, a fully free/libre version of Android, we discovered that the proprietary program running on the applications processor in charge of handling the communication protocol with the modem actually implements a backdoor that lets the modem perform remote file I/O operations on the file system.

Are there cases where a similar situation has been described with a USB 1.1 audio device using an open source driver? Or any other class of USB device used by tens of millions of people?
Interesting. Well, you could write a custom type for Postgres as a C extension with all those collations, indexing and other requirements, I know that's not quite SQL or out-of-the-box kind of solution, but still, there are options if you really need it.
I don't think that answer was there when I had first come across that question (back in 2010-2011).

That answer is about typed languages. The issue is with dealing with dynamic types. There is a lot more code generated for the JIT to compile.
Yeah, looks like I wasn't thunking it hard enough. I was tapping it with the force of a tap to click trackpad.
I think they're just listing the POPs that were unreachable from their main office. It was definitely more widespread than that.
Process spawning in Linux, or “my child ate my brains”
I think Docker cannot make money on its own. It's already too late for them to build on the hype as other companies captured the most critical customers / audience.
Trump officials clamp down on worker visas
I really like the idea but I do see one problem with the premise. I've been programmed to jolt awake from the sound of my alarm. I've been listening to the same alarm for years and my body just knows it has to GET UP NOW when that noise is made. Hell even if I hear it halfway through the day it's like I feel a static shock.

Perhaps it could play a base line noise that's guaranteed to wake you up and fade into the music?
I wonder how many people making these statements and doing these analysis have spent any significant amount of time with kids. Girls, in general, prefer social interaction, helping people, working as a group, etc... Boys, in general, prefer physical activity, constructing things, and admiring the fruits of their labor from afar.

This might not be the best characterization, but you get the point. I see this in very very young kids. It's innate. Again, these are generalities, but most who work with a lot of young kids understand these things. It's no surprise to me that as boys and girls become men and women we see these traits dominate employment trends. Girls tend to gravitate to fields that tie success (either academically or professionally) with social interaction, while boys gravitate to ones that rely more on demonstration of individual impact.

Sure, there's an element of group dynamics, xenophobia, etc... that influences this stuff, but I've never held the belief that this stuff is the root cause. Why are more men chefs/cooks? Because, they like making food/seeing what they've made. Why are more women waitresses? Because they like serving/interracting with people. It's not that complicated.
That seems highly unprofessional. I won't even ls into users' directories without their express permission.
it is really interesting the automatic assumption of people in this thread, considering i'm guessing most didn't read past the first story about low-income men not finding work.

perhaps the use of the word feminism enforces an opinion right away regardless of what the article says.
Really, really disappointed by the lack of Windows on ARM news. All the rumors were pointing to it, but it looks like we're stuck with Intel.

Not that Intel is bad, and its gotten better on mobile, but still, legitimate choice would be nice.
Battery bonanza: From frogs' legs to mobiles and electric cars
Yes, I believe the origins of the sabbatical are in academia where it was intended to give people the ability to take an extended period of time away from their traditional role and try something different (often travel or an overseas post). This helped keep them fresh and allow them to broaden their range of experience without needing to permanently leave the institution. More recently, the term has been bastardized to a certain extent by start-ups who use it as a form of "bonus vacation" for long-serving team members.
I agree with your general premise, that abstraction is essential and sufficient for us to understand a lot of the functions and mechanisms of the cell.

I do, however, think that the author is right in calling the cell ferociously complex, and that a lot of the abstractions we use hide and gloss over a chaotic system whose particulars can explain a lot of unexplained or misunderstood processes. That's fine to help us get an initial understanding, but you always want to drill down to a lower level abstraction until you (don't) reach the bottom of the stack of turtles.

Biology undergoes a major paradigm shift couple of decades, and minor paradigm shifts on an even more regular basis, and I attribute that largely to the increasing resolution with which we're able to observe things.

Ten years ago, microscopes were shittier, we were using microarrays instead of RNA/DNA-seq, we weren't using biotinylated-fusion proteins... but that stuff was necessary for us to really prove in a persuasive way ground-breaking shifts like that the DNA->Protein->Function paradigm isn't sufficient to describe a lot of what goes on in a cell.

PREEMPTIVE EDIT: I know that DNA->Protein->Function paradigm was questioned way earlier than 2007, but it's taken a lot of persuasive evidence since then using modern techniques to get things like lncRNAs implicated in cancer
This seems like a couple years too late. Just from specs alone there are better laptops coming out of China today from Xiamo, Chuwi, etc. Stuff like the Xiaomi Mi book (https://www.engadget.com/2016/07/27/xiaomi-mi-notebook-air-l...) or Chuwi Lapbook (http://www.zdnet.com/article/windows-10-laptops-chuwi-prices...) that are thinner, lighter, have high resolution displays, etc. and that cost significantly less than $999. This just looks like something forgettable that will be lost in a sea of middling Windows ultrabooks.
The challenges involved are still insanely tremendous. For ex, correctly simulating folding a lot of the larger human proteins de novo is still beyond our capabilities.
Sure, individuals are individuals.

I was addressing the larger question of why not many men become nurses. Not saying that those who do are not nurturing and good at what they do.
It seems very much like the B+ tree approach is just a mental model put on top of the exact same idea that is being argued against. The initial list of "bad things about LSM approaches" has almost exactly the same items on it as the list of features the B+ approach claims to achieve.

Maybe I'm getting this all wrong, but aren't the leaves also representing chunked data, which is compressed.

The Prometheus solution also sequentially places compressed chunks for the same series. The time slicing actually has a lot of benefits and can simply be seen as the first level of the described B+ tree. An index of chunks for a series can then be seen as the second level.

The potential read amplification here seems completely equivalent. Just from my high-level view, all properties of the read and write path seem almost identical.
I'd deff give one star feedback to anyone waking me up using the brown note.
To make a simulation of many atoms, you must do a lot of approximations. For example that the electrons are affected only by the nearby atoms, and use an approximate model for each atom. It has a lot of assumptions, but it provides good enough result and the runtime is O(n).

If you make less approximation, you get a accurate results that consider more of the quantum details of the problem, but the runtime is something like O(n^6) or O(n^9). If I can abuse the notation, it's more "accurate" to calculate the run time as O((5n)^9) or O((10n)^9), i.e. the invisible multiplicative constant is big and you can only calculate molecules with a few atoms. With some additional approximations you can use them for bigger molecules, but not too big, something like up to 100 atoms.

For an accurate simulation, the problem is exponential, the run time is something like O(comb(10n,5n)^3) where comb is the combinatorial number, something roughly like O((10n)^(15n)). This can be used for very small molecules with one or two Carbons or Oxygens and a few Hidrogens (because they are cheaper).

And last year I went to a research talk about the relativistic correction in the H2 molecule. They couldn't calculate all the relativistic correction for a molecule with more than 2 atoms last year.
Thanks - I found the framework performance towards the bottom very interesting.

What about including other popular frameworks? Ruby on Rails, Laravel, ASP.NET, symfony, express.js
If I couldn't be sure if the document was authentic, you can be sure I'd want proof of authenticity from the court before I complied. Throw the book at me if you like, I will present my case to the court. If it was proven that the department were issuing fraudulent subpoenas, shouldn't we treat all their subpoenas as questionable until proven otherwise? It seems like a perfectly reasonable response. Of course, IANAL and TINLA applies.
How about preloading of songs over wifi only. Another way could be to automatically enable wifi a few minutes before the alarm time.

Defaulting to standard ringtone if no song was downloaded.