skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is true. And not true.

It is SO true that a company is a team effort. It is also sadly true that CEOs get most if not all the credit of what their teams accomplish even if they didn't have much of a part in it. The current CEO "God" Jobs said as much, and in fact had wrong intuitions on a number of the most critical things today in Apple's business... a gigantic one being a hesitance to open up the iPhone to 3rd party apps. I think other Apple team members eventually convinced Jobs (probably didn't take that much effort) to open things up. Jobs was rightfully concerned 3rd party apps could crash your phone which wasn't a good idea!!

That said, when Apple didn't have a strong product-focused leader we saw where it went earlier, and one can see how it's floundering today -- under Cook, Apple was maybe 2 years or more late with a large screen phone and the iWatch is not good at all. Tesla under a certain CEO has in less than 15 years what's widely considered the world's best car...beating few dozen companies with long histories of making cars and limitless resources. Amazon took big risks with AWS, Prime, and many other things and failed miserably many times e.g. the Fire phone...but they have a leader who kept pushing things forward. Compare Amazon to say Walmart (to my view largely the same company it is today that it was 20 years ago) or any other e-commerce company. The visionary leader who can deliver revolutionary products relentlessly really does matter.
Learning any language changes your thinking patterns to the implicit assumptions built into the language structure. you may find the work of Ferdinand Saussure of interest.
>A very convenient excuse, which is precisely why I don't find it convincing. Please spare me your patronizing explanations of Terms of Service; having already studied law they're not very impressive.

Do you have an argument that's not "it was unfair because it was technically illegal and Lyft probably didn't like it"? Maybe there'd be a more impressive answer if you could offer a more impressive proposition.

>Win-loss outcomes are zero-sum by definition. I don't see this discussion going anywhere productive from here.

This is pure fantasy. Win-loss is an unavoidable fact of any competition. You are competing because you are trying to get the the same limited resource (in this case, the market for a ride-hailing app). That's what makes it a competition.

Giving up because you don't like competing is the same as a loss. The entity that gets that portion of the resource won, and the entity that didn't lost. A loss doesn't have to be wholly unprofitable, but it's still a loss.

You have arbitrarily defined all competitions as fundamentally zero-sum. You say they're zero-sum by definition: the definitions I know of win means that someone has gained something and loss means that someone has either failed to gain something they wanted or lost something they had (not necessarily in proportion to the person who won).

This is only zero-sum if you believe that all resources could be utilized equally well in anyone's hands. This is not even communistic or socialistic where a central authority decides the appropriate way to allocate resources, it's just anarchy.
Charles proxy, Paros, Burp and Fiddler are all great tools to intercept and modify traffic.

Great for debugging or just inspecting/reversing/hacking in general.

Im glad if similar tools are being made available as browser extensions, it might lower the barrier to entry and get more people poking at the network layer.

PS: https://github.com/square/PonyDebugger is a cool debugger that lets you use Chrome developer tools when developing iOS apps.

PS2: https://paw.cloud/ and some other tools take these proxies to a whole new level in terms of UI/polish.
An aggregate +6.3 for Clinton doesn't translate to "100% sure he wouldn't win"
I don't tend to use StackOverflow all that much. Once in a while I'll look up a poorly documented error code on Google and one of the results will be S.O. But, then again, I tend to stick with languages and libraries with adequate documentation.

Honestly, if one is constantly looking everything up on StackOverflow, they're either using a very poorly documented technology or they might want to hit the books a bit and work on proficiency. "Knowing the literature" is becoming more and more underrated.
Once a bacteria evolves that has a taste for plastics, we might have some trouble. It's probably not a very energy dense food source, but abs burns pretty well. There's some power there
They don't have SNI, but the newer ALB does have path based routing. So you can use a wild card or multidomain cert, if you can segment routes to endpoints by uri path.
23yo engineers are often also willing to bunk up with three friends in a two bedroom apartment, which makes living in SF/SV more feasible. Once you have a family (generally, older engineers) you generally dont want to be sharing an apartment, so your minimum salary requirements go up.
Usually this is done with a CDN in front. Cloudfront supports SNI.
more close to US$.7, but depends on how much you earn, a short cab ride might be 10-20RMB - it matters
"Trump will never fulfill his promises"

(I'm over here)
The warnings, other than symbol GC in MRI <= 2.1, refer to using Oj in `object` mode: marshallings arbitrary Ruby object graphs to/from JSON. This is similar to pickle in python. This mode isn't what you would be using at the boundary of something like a http/json api.
I'm sad to say I'm a clueless Honda driver myself (shadow spirit 750). But his book inspired to get the manual and start working thru it. Hopefully by the summer I'm making my first adjustments.
> We have plenty of examples where landfills contaminated the groundwater and with it large swaths of ground.

The old "dumps" had this problem. Modern landfills with liners, leachate management, etc. are probably the best way to handle garbage, out of all the possible options. It's simply not possible or even practical to recycle everything.
There's many efforts which have credibility, and just because it has jimmy wales name on it doesn't make it credible.

Heres a previous discussion on the "fake news" problem with a far more credible start, because theyve actually got a better idea of the problem, and so are targetting an achievable goal -

http://www.fakenewschallenge.org/

discussed here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13542428, in February.

This isn't cynicism. I'm long long past that. This current media scenario has been cooking for more than 2 decades.

Creating a less strict media structure will not fix it.
RTFB! :)
Getting approved was also a months long process that required a substantial upfront investment in bizdev, legal, and custom engineering. And you had to do this for every single carrier, which was extra fun internationally.
A lot of people came to iOS not from cell phone development, but from developing for the desktop, where 'store' fees did not apply most of the time.
In what ways did you learn how to learn better by learning Japanese? I'm very intrigued by this. Perchance you can articulate on this.
So there's a startup for helicopters now? /s
Imagenomic Portraiture 3 Crack with License Key Full Version
Ha ha ha, he was quite champion
Just because somebody is an extrovert doesn't mean that they will be successful. Regardless of your personality you need to produce good work and get recognition for it. Extroverts simply seem to be better at blowing their own horn. But if they don't produce they will be quickly found out.

In my experience you have a great deal to gain from join a local Toastmasters chapter. Not only will they help you overcome your social anxiety, but you will also gain skills to become a more effective communicator.
So far it hasn't been so much "make or break" as "survive or break" though
You're missing the point. There's a big difference between opening a mass-produced item from a manufacturing plant and a homemade gift from an Etsy seller. Apple's vision, in its quintessential days, wasn't focused on selling products to mass amounts of people internationally, but only focused on giving detail that passionate and loyal customers of Apple would appreciate. Even iPhone launch parties felt special, they handed out pizza, held free giveaways and other swag to the crowd waiting in line.

They've simply lost their touch of resembling a company that started out of a garage and are looking more like a Walmart superstore of electronics with knowledgeable reps that only care about the quantitative.
I found the road trip part of the book enjoyable, but the philosophy (Quality) talk a bit drawn out and something I didn't get. Have been intermittently reading it, but haven't finished it yet.
10 Indoor Fun Games for Toddlers This Summer
E31A Eritrea
India keeps the poor away from Medical colleges
You don't, because it has no bearing on subsequent events. It might be interesting to consider that on a subsequent reading (ZAMM certainly stands up to multiple readings) but you're just as apt to mislead yourself by projecting your incomplete knowledge of his eventual end onto his behavior and utterances in the book; so you might find yourself reading it and thinking 'oh, this element in his character no doubt played into his murder' when iirc the circumstances of his death were essentially random.
Lily Cole is an advisor against fake news?
Also reminds you that you should be CAREFUL with what extensions you install. As they can pretty much do whatever they want ;)
Thanks for the link. I added my +1 with the comment:

"Would be a competitive advantage as well since AWS ELB's don't support multiple certificates attached to a single ELB."
I didn't ask how following around a concrete worker could be dangerous.
There aren't laws allowing only one provider. In fact those are banned by the FCC (though a few grandfathered Exclusive franchises may exist).

On the other hand a lot of America only got telephone access after the att monopoly was formed in 1913.

Most of the rest of the world only has one hardware network run by a well regulated monopoly.
Well appstore is a walled monopoly and has pretty awful discovery. There's a huge tail and only the top 10 really make it.

They are using their monopolistic stance to kill others. But then it's their platform and they can do as they please. They gotta make the $$$ to keep shareholders happy with ever expanding profits.

Welcome to America.
There's a few reasons for that

* no one ever got hired for under-engineering

* a lot of people have died from under-engineering

* you never notice how much was engineered juuuuust right (tm). Because it was. Just. Right.
> Wales, who sits on the board of Guardian Media Group, the Guardian’s parent company, founded Wikipedia with Larry Sanger in 2001, before donating the entire project to a non-profit organisation, the Wikimedia Foundation, that he set up in 2003.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/apr/25/wikipedia...
How to Overcome the Fear of Street Photography
I've never used it seriously, but the bit pattern pattern constructs look really sweet. I don't write a lot of protocol code anymore. But I remember doing parsing badly on 10-100 bytes to figure out what a message meant. Websocket stuff would get a lot of help from that syntax.
Fancy molds with high tolerances require multiple iterations of making molds then destroying them. You can also find that parts are not able to be shot, usually before, but sometimes after making the mold. The texturing and cuts are expensive and difficult as well.

If they were going for Apple-level tolerances, they're walking into a minefield.
It's very nice to say that business is almost always a team effort, but it does not explain why some teams succeed and other don't.
Did you ever take apart their plastic macbooks? They were packed to the gills, with 3x as many screws and parts as any Dell.
It's turtles all the way down. Even CEO's feel like they have no agency at times.

It depends on the maturity level of the business you're in. In mature industries customers have a clear picture of what the software should do, even if suboptimal, and you're just there to turn their preconceptions into running software. In new industries nobody knows exactly what it can do, so you have a lot more agency as a developer.

I spent years working on an IWMS system and always felt trapped by other people's ideas, and then moved on inside the same company to a smart building project where I can pretty much do what I want because the market hasn't decided yet what such a system should do. The tricky part is selling something people don't understand yet, but luckily smart building is in the leading edge of a hype cycle.
A version without the paywall: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/07/people-would-rather-b...
Scientism is good for making better predictions, but it won't tell you how to live. You could be a utilitarian and declare that you will live to the end of maximizing your utility (however you define that) but the problem with utilitarianism is that omniscience is elusive.
Hey, He is not on LinkedIn. He has only Army hospitals as customers and he has a standalone application/Software. All the customers he got were from word of mouth and personal connections so did not bother to create the website.

Plus he is not doing that for money.
The issue in America is that cable is hard to local loop unbundle. Unlike dsl, each cable user shares a circuit with dozens, if not hundreds of users.

I don't think it's technically feasible.
Yes, YOU, and me. We can all do our own research to discern what is fake or not.
Hey sorry, did not know about this. I will keep this in mind for future posts.
It doesn't, which is why these states switched to more reasonably priced alternatives.
Those things are certainly a big chunk. But burrying a wire is expensive.
This Robot Could Prevent You from Ever Having to Get a Colonoscopy
Show HN: HackerNews NLP client
I'm 42 and 3.5 months into my first full time coding job.
I wasn't able to reply to your question below.

I think it was the program (Ohio State has an excellent program) that provided me with the tools for this.

It came down to imitating successful patterns of speech and behavior (they called them core conversations), the heavy focus on proper intonation (more imitation, if your intonation is off, you're never going to make Japanese speakers comfortable listening to your speech) and the practice of spaced repetition (through flashcards, for learning kanji), which I had never been exposed to growing up.

For that last one, I'm actually in debt of my buddy who got me into the kanji flashcards.
There's much more to it than that. Executive compensation doesn't correlate well to company performance. Companies are historically horrible determining what makes a good CEO.

Other potential explanations for inflated CEO pay (relative to previous decades) include executive compensation boards staffed by executives in similar positions from other companies, and boards that want to keep up appearances by having a highly paid CEO.
According to some comments, the api isn't even public. This behavior is quite thuggish of a digital sorts.

I once heard from an Uber driver that the CEOs of the two companies hated each other and have gone crazy competing against each other.

Either it's over a woman or they're really messed up in the head. Regardless, this is very disappointing.
Formula Value Calculations, Enhanced Recalculation for MPP and XML File Formats
Sitting quietly for a half hour with only one's own thoughts is hardly as terrible as you make it sound. If anything, it builds character. It is an experience and a challenge.

Keep in mind that detention was introduced after corporal punishment became socially unacceptable.
>On the other hand, I completely disagree with your last paragraph. That kind of world is my definition of hell. Winners are "happier"? On what metric? Is Lyft a "loser" company? Are it's employees losers? Who's "unhappy" in this scenario? A "win at all cost" culture that leaves the losers in the dust sounds like a nasty, vile dystopia.

It's not "win at all costs". It's "win at some costs"; in other words, a competition with some rules.

Business is a competition and your competitors are going to be looking for and actively exploiting the advantages they can get over you. This necessarily requires you to look for advantages you can get over them or just cede the market, and if you're willing to do that, there's no point in competing in the first place.

It's sad how HN is here demanding meticulous adherence to a clause buried deep in the incumbent's ToS and pretending that violating it is some basic moral misdeed.
Luckily we also had some great teachers. Several of the teachers there got me on the right path in a lot of ways. The problem with schools in the US is it really is luck of the draw in terms of who you come into contact with.
Fresh-squeezed juice is not actually fresh. It's still made from a concentrate.
Really nice article, my mind is always blown by all the cool shit we keep on learning about our Earth.

And then the article became all the more sweeter when I realised that it all this work was done by people I know at Geoscience Australia. Very cool.
ASUS ZenFone models are pretty solid, I own ZC550KL with 5000 mAh (sic!) battery and it works like a charm, up to 3-4 days without plugging.

But beware: speaker on my model sucks donkey balls, sometimes I can't even hear a call from my pocket.
> Is it impersonation if I just don't go in wearing the opposing team's colors? What if I go wearing the playing team's jersey? What if I'm the coach of that other team so I wear a hat and sunglasses? Where's the line of "impersonation"?

You're playing with the words, rather than the meaning behind them, and you're smart enough to know that. You're mixing up morality and legality a lot, which I find interesting. I wouldn't say that they have much to do with each other. I'd consider corporations (generally speaking) as amoral entities, striving against the bounds of punishment under the law, and the law as an amoral construct acting as the buffer and interface between other entities (individuals, corporations, other nations). Its job is to act in the interests of the people, one aspect of which is encouraging, but also regulating, the competition in the market. Working toward an even playing field, and correcting when it falls short of providing that.

> I'll argue that it doesn't cross the threshold from "deception required to be basically functional in a competitive environment" into "immoral and personally compromising deception".

I'd argue that it crosses the threshold into behavior that should fall outside the bounds of legal competition. We're better off with many weaker competitors than we are with one strong one.
Yep. You see this a lot when it comes to writing as well.
House commission can be compared.

Amazon charges 15% for most things. eBay is 9%. Etsy is 3.5%.

Software house commission is definitely on the high side. Interesting that Steam, Apple, and Google are all at the same rough figure.
There is no minimum investment for an E2 visa. My lawyer who is currently assisting me through the process has gotten approvals for investments of just $14,000.
Could you go more into detail how these story points would work. It seems like in the end a story point would always be associated with a number of days (or hours).
I've owned the ebook of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance for years but never read it. I think I need to finally make time for that book.
Man that's a hammer to the head. I don't remember my copy having this afterword, thanks for linking to it.
How to Build a Product II - Aaron Levie
I'm fairly certain the "understanding the stack" argument has been sufficiently addressed by Carl Sagan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s664NsLeFM

We're building abstractions so people can build on top of it. And yes, that includes trusting your tool. When's the last time you ran JTAG debugging on your CPU? Did you use a scope to verify it worked correctly?

You should probably have a somewhat decent understanding of the layers close to what you building, but there are plenty of applications where deployment is far removed from what you actually build. That's where the "magic button" matters.
Google is widely acknowledged to be near the top of the heap w/r/t compensation.
ISPs can sell your data without your consent. Here's how to shield your privacy
Avast Internet Security 2016 Key and Activation Code Is Here
New Macbook's Touchpad Unnecessarily Too Large? Here's a Fix!
Presuming sanity prevails and people don't double down at the Crazy Buffet wanting more.

Remember 2004?
"An Engineer can do for a dime what any fool could do for a dollar."

One of my favorite instructors from college.
I'd never heard of her, so I read about her on Wikipedia[0].. the impossible.com involvement seems relevant to this.

[0](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lily_Cole#Business_activities)
Easy answer. No. Not for just this app.
A Seven Dimensional Analysis of Hashing Methods [pdf]
They also called Mélanchon "far-left"...
Mapping the End of Malaria
Coax should be gradually all replaced with fiber optics.
>one may make a copy of his/her original for the other because the others original may have been destroyed

But then how would you prove you owned the original in the first place?

I could claim to have at one point owned every Sega Genesis game but unfortunately set the box down while moving and ran it over with a truck while backing out the driveway. I of course did not keep this box of now shattered carts and I also bought it with cash from a man on Craigslist so there really isn't a paper trail.

Is there a court case within the last 10 years we can reference that dealt with this kind of situation of once owning the original but it ended up destroyed?
You could walk in with a brand new Playstation 4 system and do the same thing.
"Trump will never be impeached."

"Trump will never do jail time."

"Trump will never lead a prison riot that gets a thousand prisoners killed."

"Trump will never cruise the nuclear wastelands of America with his gang of misfits in their hacked together deathmobiles..."
I've been using a tiny Krups Esprimo for over 10 years. One of the tubes popped off after a few years, but after taking the shell off and identifying the culprit, I just used a zip tie as a miniature hose clamp and have been going strong for a long time. The key with the hose was to clean the nozzle: it has a single port, so a clogged port is a single source of failure. But $90 for an 8-bar espresso machine is hard to beat. Not good for random joe, but fine for a hacker.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00007CWFE
That is exactly my question if there is a way to schedule offline actions (such as voting) and then release them when online again.
The actual title is "A Seven-Dimensional Analysis of Hashing Methods and its Implications on Query Processing".
That's why the aluminium unibody design has been the standard now.
Amazing how a 60% chance of winning doesn't mean "guarantee", huh?
I would argue that "systems developer" is the opposite of "full stack"
Your average full attack dev probably doesn't even know what assembler is.
That means that there are certain things which aren't answerable, at least not easily or precisely. But that isn't a problem with the epistemology you adopt: some things are going to be hard or impossible to know no matter how you define knowing.

Or, "how to live" isn't an epistemological question. So demanding that an epistemology accept aesthetic standards to accommodate concerns about how to live is confused.
Nagging question - why would this need to be state-specific?
Anonymity is not the goal, because it is another separate task.

NNCP contains nncp-daemon and nncp-caller that work with online protocol. It uses Noise protocol: http://noiseprotocol.org/ (Noise-IK). So ratcheting as Signal does is already applied. http://www.nncpgo.org/Sync.html