skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The fix is described here:

https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src.git/+/08cb718...

It seems very limited in scope, essentially preventing the Unicode display of a domain that only contains the following "Latin-alike" Cyrillic characters: "асԁеһіјӏорԛѕԝхуъЬҽпгѵѡ".
Jupyter Notebook Sharing Is Caring
If you're thinking of America, it has homework to do first with SS (health care for all). I can see your perspective coming from there, I don't think it would be a viable argument in Europe.
Agreed. It's a quick way to go broke if you don't know what you're doing.
You make a great point. Rather than neural nets operating on vectors they need to operate on typed graph structure and compute recursive functions with memory stacks.

Kind of like how computers work but learn the code and reason about data structures automatically
Well, yeah, that's because fewer people are getting married. If you don't get married you can't get divorced! But that doesn't mean more kids aren't living in "broken" homes.
You can use the accelerometer to figure out which way is "down". Then, using CV techniques to identify the ground plane. Even if you get this a bit wrong, as long as you visually track some registration points, you get consistent positioning of your virtual object, which is probably the most important bit.

I noticed in the videos that nothing ever goes in front of the animated objects, so they're probably not identifying objects, and trying to figure out object boundaries or anything like that. It's a simple, well-polished trick.
Exactly! I suspect most American programmers are woefully unprepared for even the most basic of programming tasks. I wouldn't be surprised if that figure - if it can even be credibly measured - is north of 90%.
The universal approach is also immensely less complicated, both for the government and the beneficiaries.

It also doesn't create a "marginal tax" trap where if poor people get a higher income, they can lose 100% or more of it to lost benefits.
Now I have to figure out how I do that. I have always assumed that I am able to do so because I am familiar with the dimensions of the things typically in my field of view.
Higher education. Where to start?

Tenure is a huge cost to the university and not every professor is both an amazing researcher and an amazing teacher. So you have a chunk of the budget spent on old researchers while poorly paid adjuncts fill in for undergraduate classes. Not sure if fixable.

Politics runs everything. Broken clock Ayn Rand was at least somewhat right in Atlas Shrugged when she speculated that bringing about the end of money would usher in an age of pull. That's exactly how higher ed works: unless you can justify your work with student evaluations and big $$$ research grants, politics runs a lot of decisions. Not sure if ever fixable.

No two American universities are alike. Colleges within universities have major differences too. Good luck getting any real traction consolidating IT services. Everyone has different needs and cut-outs for their work.

Higher education is a hydra. It cannot be fixed or reformed at the drop of the hat or with the use of an app.

Abandon simple solutions, all ye who enter here.
I don't know how anyone could think of content on facebook as being indexable or searchable. Search is still aweful
If you assume people have the attention span of gnats, I guess.

If I'm clicking a link to unsubscribe you're not going to get me to start entering personal information.
صور+نجوى+كرم+2017+اجمل+صور+نجوى+كرم+جديدة+و+اخر+اخبارها
That's a great way to give your hard-earned money to large trading firms.
On OSX Chrome 57 I'm getting this making it mostly unusable for me parse anything. Its going out of the page and without even a scroller
http://imgur.com/a/SpgNy
Because it's harder to enforce on a team whereas a central service (also as a 2nd security layer) deals with it on behalf of the team/org
I don't like the idea of walled gardens and echo chambers, which is the major benefit Mastodon is providing over Twitter. Already this isn't morphing into a community where people have more control, its encouraging people to insulate themselves into communities where everyone thinks the same way and dissenting opinions can be squashed by the site moderators. I would like to think this kind of freedom would lead to greater exchange of ideas and open lines of communication, but everything I have seen online points in this going the opposite direction.
Both Mastodon and GNU social are implementations of the OStatus suite of protocols.
> The vast majority (outside HN)

I think one could build a strong userbase in countries where people want privacy from their governments, on top of the "HN crowd".
A password manager would be what (hopefully) saves me from this.
The emerging battle for the family authentication layer
Maintainer vs. Community – Open Source Communities
The only reason I use Twitter is to keep in touch with the Irish literary scene really. They're hardly going to be on Mastodon anytime soon. So pretty much everything.
Regarding fees, only large entities (those with more than 10 million additional ad impressions per month due to participation in the Acceptable Ads initiative) have to pay. For these entities, our licensing fee normally represents 30 percent of the additional revenue created by whitelisting its acceptable ads.

You are right. That fee is anything but fair. I was under the impression that they were operating their program under a non-profit, but it doesn't seem so.
U2F as a second factor prevents this (and many other) kinds of phishing attacks.

The token's crypto takes the page's domain into account.
I've noticed your trolling re: emacs & vim vs IDEs in the previous days (ie: mostly argumentless name calling), but I'll bite anyway.

Linus uses microEMACS, Guido uses emacs, Bjarne uses sam. The list goes on. What is your point exactly? That they are all fools & idiots? Or that the Linux, python & C++ projects do not qualify as serious programming?

Is it unfathomable that they know something you don't? Is it inconceivable that some people out there have a different yet valid opinion?

My personal experience with the few large codebases I've had to work on in the past is that IDEs would choke on them. If we wanted to get any work done that day we'd have to do it in a lighter code editor. As an added bonus, if we used vim or emacs we could now be as proficient remotely as we were locally.
The only time I was hit by a car while riding my bicycle is when I was riding on the sidewalk. Drivers are barely aware of pedestrians half the time, let alone one moving at 3-4x walking speed.
Flux, a simple CQRS Framework for go
I didn't like the 2000 SyFy miniseries at all :( It looked so... cheap and campy. There are plenty of flaws in Lynch's Dune, but it managed to look awesome at times. The meeting between the Emperor and the Navigator is awesome and ominous. Nothing in the SyFy miniseries matches this. And SyFy's Baron Harkonnen manages to look completely non-threatening :(

I really hate the miniseries.
Can somebody confirm that the link is safe to open?
I believed so too, but reading on Wikipedia somewhat opened my mind to different arguments, since they underscore how the average life expectancy could be said to be approximately 70 years at the introduction of the 70 year retirement age in Germany.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Socialism_%28Germany%29#...
This really depends on the reason you want to learn.

For back-end development I would orient towards Golang. Its approach to concurrency makes efficiently utilizing multiple cores a breeze; something that is not quite so simple in Node/PHP. As well, it's common that you'll find yourself able to get more out of individual machines - this will allow you to get more money out of said machines and, as a second-order effect, can delay the onset of scaling concerns. As an aside, as a primarily JavaScript developer, I do have to admit Go has a very impressive stdlib.

For taming your tools but not changing ecosystems I would recommend looking into TypeScript. It just being a superset of JavaScript means you can do incremental adoption while still enjoying all of the JS knowledge you've built to date.

For learning new paradigms I would either recommend Haskell for a "strict functional" path or Rust for an "immutable/non-racy" approach. Both languages take the concepts to a pretty extreme level and may feel overwhelming at first, but they can be brought back to your existing back-end development skills to help enhance the maintainability of your code.

For something between concurrency and functional programming I would recommend Erlang/Elixir - though I do so only from recommendations and not from any meaningful experience with either. Might be up your alley and definitely worth at least considering for your "one language".
How can software be insulted? Software doesn't have feelings.
What, exactly, is the bait in this case? The name? Because it sure seems as if I could still get everything as I could before. Do you really think there are people who reads a tutorial and ends up buying Docker Enterprise Edition for 9,950$ because they failed to see the "Docker Community Edition" link, which by the way, will still be available?
Nothing wrong with that.

I find that for those problems sometimes you don't even need to write a single line of code. Changing the process or the way people think about the problem can be sufficient.

Although I imagine if you drew a venn diagram with easy & important & unsolved then the intersection will be relatively tiny. And from a business defensibility standpoint the barrier of entry may be too low.
The best way I've found to compare taxes between countries with very different tax regimes is by comparing tax revenue as a percentage of GDP. Wikipedia has a nice table: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_reven...

Denmark tops the list, at 50.8%. Sweden comes in 4th, with 45.8%. The US is fairly far down and lower than almost all developed countries, at 26%.
Tesla recalls 53,000 Model S, Model X cars for stuck parking brakes
Sorry to rain in your parade, but I paid taxes in both NL and US (for the same job and status) and once you consider the extra burden in the US (health care, personal transport, insurance, property taxes if you own a house ...) it amounts to pretty much the same thing, probably less.

And obviously without any public service to justify it.
This should happen.
Looks like it switched in the 1970s

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=rite+of+passag...
Is it necessary to have different accounts to communicate across instances? Surely not?
There's a big difference in attitudes between browsers here.

Take OCSP for example - Chrome disabled OCSP because in optional mode it wasn't a perfect solution and they didn't want to enable it in required mode because that could confuse the poor users. After the heartbleed attack, Chrome was only able to bundle a tiny fraction of the certificates into their CRLs - leaving millions of domains still vulnerable to blacklisted certificates. On Chrome - you're just screwed, there's no way to turn OCSP into required mode to prevent such attacks.

On Firefox however you're able to force OCSP required - making it actually useful if you're sophisticated enough to understand what a failure of it may mean and you're actually able to blacklist all of those certificates. A huge security benefit in such a case.
SpaceX hired all NASA's engineers and uses all NASA's technologies. China builds its technologies all by itself, given that the US banned any collaboration in space program with China. You bet that SpaceX launched a few more than rockets than China. Even that, China has a higher success rate than SpaceX in rocket launching. SpaceX explodes a little too often.
I would guess that's where the majority of youtube's users are. Kinda deceptive to use "world population" when that includes places like China where youtube isn't available
That is an ordinary DV cert. GP is talking about EV certs, which in theory assures you that Apple, Inc. specifically owns the domain name you're on, not just the operator of the server.
It seems to me they are leveraging their monopoly position in one area to dominate competitors in other areas. IANAL, but isn't that the very reason antitrust exists?
They're not advertising it as universal memory or a DRAM replacement though, so I'm not sure why you would make that comparison. They're advertising it as sitting between RAM and an SSD on the storage hierarchy, and it seems to mostly deliver on that promise.
Possible solutions:

A. Are you sure your name is not undefined?

B. Perhaps you can change your name to undefined to fix this issue.

:P I'll get on this.
Ontario slaps 15% tax on foreign buyers
Smaller vendors are making money from turnkey k8s. There are at least two I won't mention.

Docker is out on a limb with the dynamic mesh, nobody else is using the p2p gossip protocol that I know of and there are problems, and Docker paid-for support is just dropping tickets related to networking issues making this work. The service outages caused by mesh gossip problems are simply measureable by NewRelic free ping synthetic monitors. Docker is getting paid--they are falling down on support.
Wow, this hits close to home. I have shipped exactly 1 feature that has helped anyone, and it's only helped a few 10s of thousands of people. And the product which uses the feature is probably going to shut down soon.
I just learned that we have a GUTS at my new employer, Bloomberg, too. But it has nothing to do with asking for a monorail between the Sydney offices.

There are only so many words. And many of them similar.
PhotoScan: Taking Glare-Free Pictures of Pictures
Utah is special: https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2017-03-28/how-utah-...
FCC Chairman Pai Gets an “F” for Fake History of Broadband: Heard of TeleKansas?
I've been biking to work every day in Manhattan for about 2 years (~3.5mi each way). I go from 14th to 70th in about 15-18 minutes. I feel healthier and stronger and it has made a difference in every aspect of my life.

There are two reasonable hills on my way to work (and I'm a sweaty guy) so I've had to learn to deal with the inevitability of sweating.

The NUMBER ONE most important change I made was getting a rack and an Arkel saddle bag. Not carrying my backpack on my back cut down my sweating a TON.

During the winter I wear regular clothing with uniqlo v-neck airsim undershirts. I will sweat a little but generally I shed layers as I get hot. I've switched from cotton shirts and blue jeans to mostly flannel shirts and mostly black jeans -- both of which help to cover any incidental sweat spots. I've also switched to more breathable sneakers for daily use. I'll bring a change of shoes clothes if I need to be dressed fancier.

During the summer, with Manhattan heat and humidity, there's no avoiding getting sweaty. I bring a change of clothes, cool off for 5m after parking my bike and then change and walk into work. Not ideal, but the health and exercise benefits significantly outweigh the downsides.
Damn that Python team, giving themselves an unfair advantage in developing Python.

Seriously, what am I reading here?
Spam filtering has been in Thunderbird for a decade now (based on a Bayesian classifier, although it's not quite naïve Bayes). There is a capability to extend the classifier to problems beyond spam/ham classification for extensions.
Yes it is safe :)

Here is the archive version :

http://archive.is/UmARF

and the "apple.com" link :

http://archive.is/Udt7X
I've recently found dynamic pattern matching pretty valuable to completely replace REST-like server-side APIs with a data-oriented API that gets pattern matched and dispatched based on the actual values and shapes of the data structure.

It helps almost completely avoid the /get/this /get/that /set/those explosion of API getters and setters that ultimately leads to very complex client logic that makes any notion of consistency at a distance very hard to reason about.
If portability is important to you I suggest checking the Xiaomi Air 13. It's as lightweight as an XPS 13, and almost as small (+0.5cm in length and width), with arguable better keyboard, touchpad, screen and general build quality for about 1/2 the price.
It's maintenance. Sometimes it has to be somewhat radical.

I hope for two things.

1) Drag attachments to folders finally works on Linux.

2) Message filters keep working exactly as they are now or it's going to be a huge pain to migrate them. And a showstopper with no filters.
I've definitely seen websites that require you to login to unsubscribe. It's probably illegal (https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/09/log-in-to-unsubs...) but I still see it from time to time. Usually I just mark them as spam and don't bother logging in.
I wonder if integrating any of the gnu social twitter bridges or plugins would get the best of both worlds? Does anyone have experience implementing something like this: https://wiki.loadaverage.org/gnusocial/plugins/twitterbridge ?
No API just yet as design still in flux, but stay tuned.
1. Aerospace

2.1 Access to energy / energy density of fuels (batteries included). This is the case across a wide range of industries and problem areas of course, not just transportation. But incremental optimizations in efficiency have lead to squeezing more performance out of the margins, but no Moore's-law type growth will ever happen without some kind of energy breakthrough.

2.2 Going forward, tightly coupled systems will be the norm. The traditional tube-and-wing aircraft with bolted on nacelles is a bit of a dead end for civil aviation. Systems to enable a more complex design workflow (e.g. graph based dataflow with accurate gradients) will be more paramount.

3. Research into the next generation of energy storage materials, and improved large-scale gradient-based numerical optimization algorithms.
Interactive debugging is a useful tool, but it can encourage lazy reasoning. People just write something and step through until they notice some change they don't expect. That's fine and everything, but talking about "crutches" and tooling, it sounds like you may be a little biased toward big-IDE style development that makes the debugger the automatic answer v. some reasoning over the code and extra logging of potential trouble spots. There's nothing wrong with logging output v. stepping through in an interactive debugger per se.
What is the point of this platform outside of being an echo chamber? This kind of walled-off masturbatory interaction is why everything from journalism to politics is as messed as it is now.
My job is completely pointless; my company will make money no matter what I do. I (and I imagine most other people in general) do their best to normalize this in the name of having a stable life. Doing something meaningful is hard, harder than most people would want to deal with. Or at least that's the case for me.
But to be crass, does your business really care about those users? Depending on your business model and target audience, spending a bunch of resources to optimize your app in order to capture more low-income users might not make economical sense.

Even if you would like to spend that time trying to optimize your application, my experience is that it's very difficult to get the mandate to do anything beyond spending a few hours on it when you could be spending that time making some new sellable feature.
Yeah, good luck with finding a technology stack that doesn't rely on any products developed by companies...
The 2000 miniseries already looked awful and campy when it came out. I should know -- as a Dune fan I bought it instantly, and was deeply disappointed.

Lynch's version, for all its flaws, is still watchable.
This VPN vid is hilarious + awesome
Familiarity is one factor, but there are others.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monocular_vision#Monocular_c...
OK, I'll bite.

IMO, GNU Social / the broader "fediverse" is mostly uninteresting to me as a user, for a bunch of reasons:

* The user experience simply is more pleasant (a tight tweetdeck-esque UI vs. GNU Social's Twitter 2009 skin?)

* only mastodon supports important features like CW and message privacy flags

* GNU social instances, in general, are not pleasant places. For whatever reasons, the worst fediverse instances (i.e. those that feature child porn, hate speech, etc etc) are generally GNU Social. This will (and maybe already has, to some degree) changed, but it matters a lot that the vast majority of mastodon instances and mastodon users are basically decent people that are very conscious of the climate around them.

It's great that Mastodon can federate with GNU Social instances (I know and follow some people that are on GNU Social instances), but they are different things with important distinctions.

P.S. it's funny that GNU enthusiasts are doing the "you should call it GNU/Mastodon", etc., or otherwise conflating the two as demonstrating here. Federation just happens over a set of related protocols; Mastodon shares no code lineage with any GNU Social implementation AFAIK. An analogue would be if we were supposed to mention NCSA in a post about nginx. But GNU folk are gonna GNU, I guess? ;-P
What have you done to get people interested in the code base?

Have you conducted a survey which confirms that lots of people want to help, but for the macros? Or are you guessing at the reasons?

First of all, do lots of people use it; is there a large user to contributor ratio?

It's hard to get help with a FOSS project no matter what; the ones that get help are vastly outnumbered by those which don't get help. According to openhub.net, "over half of all active projects [listed] on Open Hub are solo efforts". (This is boiler plate text which appears in the summary of projects which are that way.)
Tango is the "correct" way to do this and will give essentially the most robust set of data back to whoever is looking. A SLAM image + depth based hybrid approach will always give you more robust data.

But just plain old analysis of "parallax" (things closer move faster etc) can quickly give you a workable understanding of the general geometry of a space.

The new MR headsets like Magic Leap and HoloLens likely use both types of sensors (like the kinect camera) to determine this stuff. But Snap just wants the widest push possible, and since it is not mounted on your eyes, the 'pixel stick' being off is not as much of an issue.
>The more pointless the job, the higher the pay

This doesn't mean that the higher the pay the more pointless the job, even though that's what they imply at the end
How Wells Fargo and Company Makes Most of Its Money
Brave is not fooled either, which is interesting because it's based on Chromium.

Brave	0.14.1
libchromiumcontent	57.0.2987.133

Fixed in Chrome 58, so I wonder what the significant difference is.
Interested in this point too!
No worries, after Brexit we will kick them out too back to their ... oh wait
Yes, absolutely, I had meant to mention that one but got distracted. Although it does rather collapse with Java in my mind.
Government intervention definitely creates monopolies, like in the case of telecom companies or pharmaceuticals.

But it seems many aspects of capitalism lend themselves to winner take all mechanics, resulting in large companies (airliners and telecoms and entertainment companies) constantly merging and reducing competition. So without the FTC, we might have even more monopolies. Without these laws, Microsoft would be the only PC company (MS bailed apple out to keep some "competition" around) and Intel would be the only manufacturer of CPUs (likewise for Intel and AMD).
Yeah, I'm scratching my head over that comment as well.
Learning to Fly by Crashing
Invalidating JWT tokens