skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
:D

Amit, one of the authors, has left a comment on Reddit with some more context about how these problems were solved: https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/655816/ownership_is_t...
I highly suspect that is because most of the students do not go to bed early.
Pay attention ladies and gents. This here is known as cognitive dissonance.

> Capitalism has not empowered people and does not uplift people from poverty.

Alright. So this is a definite statement. A conclusion. hmm interesting, lets's continue reading to see what reasoning this follows from.

> We're able to produce thousand times as much goods per worker as in the 1700s, and yet do we live (and by we I mean all the workers, not just us with high-level jobs in rich countries) that much better than at that time?

Ok so, capitalism created RICH countries, yet it did not uplift people form poverty. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

If I were you, I would try to state my position a bit better because you sound completely self-contradicting. What you mean to say is that capitalism have created a lot of wealth, but it hasn't evenly distributed it.

>I do agree that capitalism is a system that has had a significant impact on our ability to produce more goods, and that in some countries we can see a positive impact

ooh look. That IS the EXACT OPPOSITE statement to the first one you made. Wow...

See, the reason I hate debating leftists is that they start by rejecting your statement and move on to actually PROVE IT but provide some context in which it does not satisfy what they deem to be "fair". Well, here is the thing chap. If the Congo had capitalism, the Congo would reap the benefits of that capitalism as you PROVED above that it has. It just so happens that the poorest places in the world at the least capitalistic ones. Must be a coincidence right?!

> And look at recent years too, with poverty skyrocketing even in the most "advanced" countries.

facepalm
I think it's a mistake for PS Vue to combine the two like this - it makes "on demand" look exactly the same as DVRing (begging the question of why you'd DVR anything) but in reality, as you say, it's terrible. Once I worked that out (and learned to just DVR anything of passing interest) I was fine.
Neat idea.

Is there a way you can link to the source of your information regarding the List Size, Average Clicks and Sponsor Rate?
If you're willing to pay 50% more for no ads, they wouldn't let you. Since you're the target.
There is nothing immoral about what they are doing. Why should snapchat have a monopoly on functionality?
You have to admire the grit and tenacity it takes to maintain that kind of ethos for 23 years straight.

What Jeff is basically saying here in this letter is that the pedal is to the metal, forever: We can't have process as the foundation because it ossifies the organization! Be nimble to the rules of the game.

When translated however, that means you are either empowering your organization to change and make new processes at scale and speed, or you have whatever the default process of solving problems from scratch each time. It's the anarchist's dilemma. That is a tough organization to live under if you aren't built for that, and one that only a certain type of people can thrive in.

I mean the majority of people, leaders even, when they get to some level of success will put the brakes on and coast, doing exactly the things Jeff describes: building processes to take the cognitive load off of decision making and making life just slightly easier. They build processes for "efficiency", so that they don't have to go back and do all the hard work of understanding the problem from scratch each time. The problem though, as Jeff points out is that "The process" becomes an 80% solution to 80% of the problems it's applied to (leading to 36% failure rate).

So just think about how you could - for 23 straight years - recruit, retain and develop a cadre of managers, engineers, interns, staffers etc... that in the majority of cases fall into the mindset of constantly sprinting - basically an Olympic marathoner running a 5 min mile marathon. As a leader I admire that ability.
If anyone's interested, there's a pretty well written book about the implementation:

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/publication/the-imp...
Pitch decks we used to raise $1.1M
Could you elaborate on the TJ/Express? The post you provided looks like the last one of series of events.
IIRC, there are safeguards in place to make sure there isn't a run on the bank.

I'm fairly certain retail banks can borrow from the FED to mitigate that.
It's been cheaper for a long time. In fact, I "pay" for cable TV service because it doubles my internet speed and drops my price $5/mo, even though the cable box is sitting in my attic and I use my antenna for TV programming.
Different strokes for different folks. I find NYC extremely overrated.
Thanks for the talk Matt. Lots of really good detail there. Working with both Go/Java and Microservices.
One question I have is how critical is linkerd to having a dependable microservice mesh? Another question is what did you use for async services?
Ah never thought of that... I use ssh keys myself so never a concern. You could scrub the file of all entries where you are ssh'ing in?
nope. $5/mo cheaper for double the internet speed and "free" cable TV. Comcast is desperate to get their subscriber numbers up.
The Incredible PyTorch: Curated list of tutorials, projects, libraries, etc.
Confucius say, Working from home much harder after having baby.
Not completely solved but getting there.

https://www.sling.com/programming/sports
sounds about right!
Golang is really, really easy to learn. And as always the key is practicing. Just pick up some medium size project and start building it. Stack overflow will help with the learning curve. This is how I learned to love Golang having 10+ years c# background​.
Where does the "no patents in software" position stand in relation to this story? Does it refer purely software (AKA Oracle v Google) or is it also design and experiences like stories?
Hulu silently removed free streaming and replaced it with Yahoo TV, I guess.

https://www.engadget.com/2016/08/08/hulu-ending-free-streami...
Remember Microsoft?
What was the part? They've moved to putting SN on everything, main board, chassis, etc. Make sure you have the correct SN. That being said Cisco TAC is atrocious.
Snap is a Camera Company, so I am sure that is where they will out-innovate everyone else... in the Camera Company space.
http://www.defefx.com/fios-tv-equipment/

Cable Card is 4$ / month, and there is an extra fee for HD TV but does not provide access to Video on Demand. The downside is that you’ll also need a TiVO subscription which is $12.95 per month 13 + 4 = 17$/month.

On top of this there is a fee for HD TV.
I'd agree with the ripped off part (although I'm sure there are companies that did something similar in the past). However, I'm not sure what muscle and money has to do with it. It's not like Instagram/FB were advertising for Stories (at least I didn't see any).
Open source doesn't allow you to pass the buck. Commercial software with support contracts does. There is also the "look how much we're paying! it must be good" factor.
I think the line is "undue hardship". There's a legal precedent that the accusation of accommodation of religious beliefs causing undue hardship "generally requires evidence that the accommodation would actually infringe on the rights of co-workers or cause disruption of work" [1] -- I'd argue the same goes for any personal belief system. In this scenario Jean is an asshole but I don't think it causes Jim undue hardship if she never discusses it at work. Jim has no legal right to like his coworkers, nor does Jean have to be liked. However, if she hung a Nazi flag by her desk it would be a different story.

1. https://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/foia/letters/2009/religionhandshak...
Senior New York Judge Sheila Abdus-Salaam Found Dead in Hudson River
Correct, I should have stated "most people with Hulu probably also have a Netflix subscription"
I do the pdx to lax route a lot and end up showing up under an hour to the airport most times. Pdx tsa is probably the nicest batch I've run across. Of all my flying I've only had one bad time through tsa anywhere. People just like to play into the joke about how incompetent they are. Now, MCO on the other hand is a complete joke and tsa there all need to be retrained....
Like Tweeting, but You Can't Use the Letter E
A judgement would never make them remove the features. The judgement (if reached) would award Snapchat rights (generally for a long term, up to or including perpetuity) that Facebook would then have to pay for. The removal may could come from the fact the Facebook would do that math and see that paying for the rights isn't worth it (their math would never really say that... they would pay).
Devil's advocate -- there's a big grey market in Cisco parts, and so they are probably under strict instruction to refuse support service to anyone who isn't verified as a paying customer.
I don't think Snap came up with the idea of stories either. They did it with better polish than previous ones to market. Small company comes up with idea, bigger company copies them, yet bigger company copies them. It has been going on for quite awhile. Remember Microsoft in the 90s?
I do send my resumes with a list of projects in them, with Github links. Only a few have said anything about them. If you want to take a look, it's here: github.com/ccajas

If I have to be considered as a junior to be on boarded and learning from other, so be it. I never had much guidance from more experienced people anyway. Small companies usually cannot provide that, so it's possibly time to get a fresh start as a junior at a large company. A good old "soft reset" might be the thing my career needs. I'll remove past jobs from my resume, and just keep my education info and list of projects.

> Can I suggest you reconsider your approach to applying?

Yes, you can suggest that. What other approaches do you recommend for applying?
Facebook is the one with a monopoly. They're clearly abusing their privileged position to stifle competition.

It also sets a very poor precedent for entrepreneurial people.
The CLR Thread Pool 'Thread Injection' Algorithm
I disagree, the immediate problem is not developing secure code, the problem is nobody wants to pay for security, and that's because it's cheap to slap on a disclaimer.

There's no point coming up with technical solutions that companies will never spend $$$ to implement.
Couldn't the same thing be said about books, apps, tech... or opinions? The critical difference is relevance to the present age.
Muscle/money is also equivalent to rallying resources to quickly rip off features. Let's not forget that builder (engineering/design/product) resources in small/medium size companies come at a premium.
If I'd want to diversify I'd probably look away from another Algol-inspired language. That's why I mentioned F#.

Go is an extremely practical language, maybe too practical, almost like C#. I'd rather look at something which takes a different approach, something which includes programming language research from the 90s, at least :)
It doesn't.
The OSCE targets are Vista and 2K3 Server.

That being said, the nice thing about OSCP imo is that it gives you some structure and a well set up environment to play in. I think OSCP is a great entry-level certificate and serves as a good filter to interview junior candidates.

Does this help at a more elite level, nope, but that's also not the purpose of it.
This is great! Thanks so much - really good reference point.
Is there any way to donate to the PhantomJS project? This seems like a good time to throw some money their way, in thanks for what the maintainers (mostly Vitaly over the past few months, at least, it looks like) have done.
Ahh. So you've been able to FF in anything you've specifically set to record?
> export HISTFILE=

Thank you! I didn't realize I could do that (:
I was implying that ads isn't a good way to monetize that audience. Sponsored content or affiliate networks is better.
done & done. I'm also letting go of the Dev only niche since I've been getting a bunch of feedback from other niches.
That is true. Thanks for the suggestion. I'm new to HN. :)
>>varying degrees of success.

Examples and references on this one.

This cop out is amazing from Marxist apologists, you show 40 countries with 40 flavors of Communism for a span of 40 years basically screwing their societies, the answer always seems to be "that is not real communism".

Not buying it! If you have goods to sell, show them!
Patents grant temporary monopolies. (I don't know if Snapchat has any patents that apply here though.)
They already do make them non-refundable, and they overbook. They want to get paid for (say) 105 seats on a plane with 100 seats.
Everything is predictable, given enough information. Except for Laplace's Demon, that's not possible. Aah, I love my daily fix of pedantry, which I reliably find on hackernews.
How to Use Elasticsearch, Logstash, and Kibana to Manage Logs
Elm is very different from typescript and is generally a much more involved choice than just "let's make our usual JS strongly typed".

- You need to like Elm the language (it's pretty good, but limited, not expressive)

- You need to like purity. Time.now or Math.random returns an asynchronous Task. I know why it's done like that, I just don't agree with the tradeoff.

- You need to like Elm the ecosystem or be prepared to write lots of awkward JS glue code

- You need to like Elm, the architecture (it's simple, but has tons of boilerplate and limitations)

- You need to accept Elm, the roadmap made by a benevolent dictator. The progress is slow.

Compared to a good typescript codebase, you will get like +5/10% type safety. Typescript is way more flexible, but that also mean you will have to rely a bit more on human code reviews, etc rather than the Elm compiler just telling you "no, there is only one way to do this". On the other hand, you have just typescript on one side, Elm + javascript/typescript if you want to achieve anything serious on the other :)

Go with Elm if you like being in a very, very controlled environment (frameworky) and you're afraid to make mistakes.
Go with typescript if you're a hacker who like to mix and match architectures, libs, etc and accepts things change fast in the frontend orld right now.
Well, their motives are not necessarily aligned with cord cutters as they are owned by cable companies[1].

[1] Hulu LLC, a joint venture with The Walt Disney Company (through Disney–ABC Television Group) (30%),[8] 21st Century Fox (through Fox Entertainment Group) (30%), Comcast (through NBCUniversal) (30%), and as of August 10, 2016, Time Warner (through Turner Broadcasting System) (10%, minority stake)
In my first two years, i didn't even try going to 8am classes after 1st week. And i know alot of engineering classmates who were like this. But i did end up going to 8am classes in my 4th year. Is it because you mature or because courses are actually related to you? I don't know.
Pharo/Squeak (and probably other Smalltalk systems) have a utility that let you find a function given a set of input/output examples.
Blame Cisco for wanting to squeeze out every penny from their support costs at the expense of their customers. Most of this stuff is outsourced or structured in such a way that they try to reduce ticket time and increase tickets worked (because time = labor = money). But guess what's free in this equation? Your time.

The vast majority of cost savings I see in the corporate world is like this; they're not saving money by doing a better, more clever job, they're just externalizing their costs elsewhere, whether it's another industry, another company, or another team in the same company.
Consider that bringing it up even when Wolfram isn't even mentioned is really, really boring.
I hate to do this but I don't have the energy to give you a full response. Arguing against all of HN simultaneously on this topic has been exhausting. :P

I will say that if you've never heard the example argument I gave, that just means you haven't been arguing against proponents of piracy long enough. I see it trotted out often - in fact it may be one of the most popular arguments.

(To be clear, the argument I was paraphrasing was "anyone who torrents wouldn't have bought your stuff, so it's fine.")

And yes, I've heard the "but piracy is actually GOOD for business don't you see" arguments over and over too. And it doesn't surprise me in the slightest that these sort of studies take exactly the form and shape of what you'd expect the post hoc rationalizations to look like. And please don't say "but it's a study, that means it's true and accurate." Correlative studies can basically be made to prove anything. Until I see a double blind replicated study I will remain unconvinced.

Anyways, like I said, sorry I can't go deeper here. I'm pretty exhausted by all this and will probably move to talk about aomething less contentious on HN. Like how great TypeScript is or something. :)
I've sold two phones now and only realised after that I had valuable voice recordings on there (e.g. my little one saying something cute; guitar riffs; those million dollar ideas) and I plan on fixing it once and for all with https://getvoicecapsule.com/
And yet, the someone will likely end up training them, if they would only make the hire.
I recommend buying individual shows, via iTunes/Google/etc.
These are typically ~25/season, and don't include any commercials. No need to deal with DVR restrictions, fastfowarding issues/etc.
DVR service (in any room) from Comcast costs me $10/month.
I had a similar experience with digital ocean. I reported malicious traffic coming from another customer's VM via a ticket, provided logs, etc and their response was that I needed to submit all that information via email at their abuse email address instead.

I responded that perhaps as a customer they shouldn't make me waste more of my time and instead forward the information that I had provided to their abuse department. Of course, they never responded after that. I'll never bother to report a security incident to them again. All because of "process". :-/
Please don't put lines in all caps: https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html.
>Man, I'm not sure if your home airport is not very good, you don't travel that often, or if you just have a higher base level of anxiety or what- but any drive over 4 hours and I'm on the lookout to see if I can fly there.

I'm not the person you're replying to, but I do have something to say about this.

Your situation is a bit different in that you need to be able to get from Portland to SF and back in a single day. Some people, myself included, don't have that restriction and value the journey as much as we value the destination. Personally, I absolutely LOVE long road trips. Seeing sites, eating at cozy roadside diners, listening to super loud music and sleeping in my car are all things I look forward to.
> That might be their motto, but that's certainly not their practice.

To whom does "they" refer? You're speaking as though scientists define science. That would be like arguing that, because murders are committed, therefore laws against murder serve no purpose.

Because of how science is structured, properly trained practitioners know what to doubt (i.e. everything but empirical evidence) -- claims are assumed to be false until supported by empirical evidence (the null hypothesis). The alternative is pseudoscience, which uses the opposite presumption -- a claim is assumed to be true until proven false.

In science, theories remain theories regardless of the evidence -- some theories have more weight than others, but all are open to falsification using new evidence.

In pseudoscience, because ideas are assumed true until proven false, and because most things cannot be proven false, we have Bigfoot, alien abductions, and virgins claiming to have been raped and taken seriously[1].

Take your pick, but don't assume science is defined by how it's practiced.

p.s. I was just reading a scientific paper and found this:

(from https://psychcentral.com/news/2017/04/10/genetic-link-to-str...)

"Culverhouse noted that finally, when it comes to this gene and its connection to stress and depression, the scientific method has done its job.

“Experts have been arguing about this for years,” he said. “But ultimately the question has to be not what the experts think but what the evidence tells us. We’re convinced the evidence finally has given us an answer: This serotonin gene does not have a substantial impact on depression, either directly or by modifying the relationship between stress and depression." (emphasis added)

1. https://arachnoid.com/trouble_with_psychology/
I agree that YMMV.

Although sometimes "I do not tend to make many of the mistakes that would be caught by the C++ type system" might be related to "how to use C++ type system so it would catch mistakes people tend to make".
And technological improvements making some TV even possible.

Game of Thrones being a perfect example, you could have made it in the 1990s, but what is possible today is completely different from what has been possible previously.
I'm curious - has anyone here faced trouble with Corral? Did you revert? What were your experiences?
One of my most memorable customer service examples was memorable merely because it didn't go poorly.

The vibrate function on my Ericsson T39 cell phone failed. I was dreading calling support, because I knew they'd tell me to piss off. It was a grey-market phone. I bought it on eBay unlocked, shipped to my home in the US. I wasn't the first owner, for that reason. It came with a UK charger. They didn't even sell the phone in the US.

When I called support, they asked me for the serial #, plus a code next to the serial (turns out to be the production date.. Week/year).. and my address. Almost immediately shipped me a replacement with a box to RMA the old phone.

They didn't care how I obtained it. They didn't care that it wasn't sold in my country. They didn't care that I didn't have a receipt. They CARED because I was a customer who paid money for their product, it failed, and they wanted to make it right. It was so refreshing.
I imagine it wouldn't (need to) handle particularly differently. You can pretty much put a battery wherever you like. It seems that in the Pipistrel WATTsUP removable battery modules replace the mass of the engine block.

A nice advantage for a trainer is that unlike a combustion engine aircraft, a battery powered aircraft's mass isn't changing over time, so the learning pilot can expect a more consistent handling experience.
this is why snap is not a good stock purchase until the inevitable tech dip comes -- say another 6-12 mo will be ripe to buy?
Yea, it's hard to work remote when you occasionally need $100K in test equipment to do your job
Good to see that former politicians are also being treated as badly as the rest of us. The sooner they all start realizing they aren't going to get special treatment the sooner they'll start actually representing everyone.
When I worked from home I did much more in terms of extracurricular activities. I am working in an office now and after a day of dealing with people I am exhausted and just go home to collapse. I think my social life has suffered a lot from working in an office. Yes, I interact with people but not really on my own terms.
But you'll get hurt too.

There are animals that own objects where that ownership is not enforced through any societal methods.
Just an offshoot thought, but some random art major writing one of these guides giving a bird's eye overview of the entire process is something most businesses should be able to do themselves. But they don't.