skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Luckly it's a temporary drop - book 4 (the one on the colony right?) is by far the worst part of the series and the next pair of books return back to the politicking and Holden being naive and kicked in the head due to it :) Also the story really starts tying up and gets better pacing.
I agree on your points. Although I believe giving everyone the same car (including engine) would kill F1.

I mean the historical and most influential teams like Ferrari, Mercedes, Renault and McLaren are manufacturers and they are there for visibility, they would just ditch the series and with them 95% of the fans.

There are many series with same car that are very entertaining to watch, but F1 for its own nature will never be one
> I don't know why many comments about "the customer is clearly an asshole, therefore he deserves the lock not working/the company has the legal rights to do so blah blah"

This attitude is rife in the tech industry, sadly, people somehow thing one of their own is being abused by others having an opinion or reporting an experience. Safe spaces, trigger warnings....
“Graph structure in the web” wins Test of Time Award
Also, my 35mm film cameras are now useless :-(
That is the main goal, but take the turbo switch in 2014 as a counter example-Mercedes out their turbo-charger inline with the engine, and no other teams did this[0], so they dominated for years. So yes, if you have the most money for engineers and parts, you generally have the best chance of winning.

[0]:https://www.wired.com/2014/04/mercedes-f1-turbo/
> but my understanding was that the closing of nuclear plants post-Fukushima was covered by coal.

There was a minor uptick in coal usage for a few years, however even that wasn't necessary, but due to bad policy (gas plants were standing still at the same time). By now coal usage is going down again.

There were a couple of new constructions of coal plants, but all of them were started before the nuclear phaseout. And by now most of their operators recognize that their investments were failures and will probably never pay out.

It isn't all ideal in Germany, but overall it's going into the right direction (and the success of solar in many countries these days wouldn't have been possible without the early investments in Germany that brought the prices down).
Take a look at experiment - https://experiment.com/discover

Is that not a similar idea?
> I really wish they would mandate a single engine and a singe car type.

Right now, it's the engine manufacturers (and the conglomerates behind them) that provide the biggest chunk of funding. If a single engine would be mandated, the funding would dry out.

And if you look back to pre-2014 naturally aspirated V8 engine era (which were quite closely matched), the engines were pretty closely matched but the racing was completely and utterly dominated by a single team (RBR) because of their superior aerodynamics (and exhaust blown diffusers, etc).

F1 is a multi manufacturer racing series and will remain to be one (that's what the name "Formula" stands for). If you take away the competition between the manufacturers, it would quickly cause the whole series to dry out.

There are plenty of good single manufacturer racing series out there (GP2, GP3, Formula Renault, etc). As much as I enjoy watching those, what brings me to F1 is knowing that every car on the grid is different from each other as well as different from what it was two weeks ago.
If a terrorist flies a plane into a nuclear plant, the only thing that will be uninhabitable will be the plane.
> We still don't know how to handle spent fuel.

Actually we do, technically, and the amount is trivial (and can be reused, though that isn't currently being done). Spent fuel is a political problem. In fact, last time I checked even just the radiation from coal power plants is greater than from nuclear plants.

> The exact same line was fed to us when Chernobyl was state of the art

Chernobyl was never state of the art and western reactors, which are much safer, are also of a design derived from military designs, not optimized for safety. Also, the negative health effects of coal and other energy sources are so much worse than even Chernobyl that it isn't funny.
Mom-shaming is one thing.

Calling child protection services because other parents allow their kids to roam outdside without constant supervision is a whole different kettle of fish.
> Nuclear power has a closed fuel cycle: what goes in comes out and is stored.

Nowadays yes, but this wasn't always the case. The earliest Soviet reactors were open cycle and discharged directly into Lake Kyzyltash. [0]

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Karachay
So Amazon seems to be competing pretty hard for my streaming dollars.

I subscribe to Netflix and I buy a HBO Go subscription when GoT comes around (and cancel it right afterwards)

Given the good things I've heard about a few of Amazon's shows (the Man in the High Castle for instance), I'm tempted to give it a try.

But I'm not going to pay for two streaming services at the same time. I just don't stream enough to make it a feasible choice.

I reckon this is a good problem to have. Lower costs for me, and higher content quality
An aside from the article: What are the best ways to get access to journals? Is there some sort of subscription program like Spotify / Netflix but for journals?
Apartments in Yerevan – Armenia Hospitality and DMC
It's more than that. Medicines should be in bottles where the category is indicted by the bottle shape and color, and the stronger the color the more concentrated/dangerous the medicine is. This would reduce a lot of hospital accidental deaths.

Bottle shapes indicating content have a history going back to wine bottles.
> We still don't know how to handle spent fuel.

Yes we do, we can reprocess most of it and then just store what's left - which is such a small amount it could just be buried and essentially forgotten about.
Of course you can. But x86 machine code doesn't have Monads just because Haskelll can be compiled to it. In both cases, the concepts have to be broken up to be implemented, as they are not meaningful at that level.
Can someone provide some hard numbers from real projects as to is it really worth it assuming we can gzip/brotili?
Unless you have a Nexus or Pixel, it probably hasn't.
Yes, except that dam disasters have killed a lot more people than nuclear disasters.
Sure. Fire away.
There was essentially instability and chaos in the big dev heavy divisions at MS when they all worked in one branch, but that led very rapidly to more sophisticated models with more points of validation between the average dev and the common code/builds that qa and everyone else shared and used.
That sounds reasonable but is naive and does not take into account how corrupt people are. John Ehrlichman, White House counsel to President Nixon said:

"The Nixon campaign in 1968 and the Nixon White House after that had two enemies: the antiwar Left and black people... We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or black. But by getting the public to associate hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily"[1]

So taking into account things like cultural prejudice. Those things are unlikely to be fixed just with good will and altruism.

[1] http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/9659888
> As such we're happy to issue you a refund

They didn't offer this, the bricked the device and suggested returning it to Amazon, who have no power over any of this.
Atom crashed and my source file ended up blank
Let's try it this. You get cloud powered pacemaker and you contact the company on its forum because it gives you cardiac arrhythmia.

The answer from the company is "we don't want you as a customer so we remotely blocked your pacemaker from ever functioning, you now have a choice between us keeping your money for something that will not work because we made sure it won't or give us our device back and the third party store will give you a refund".

I made thicker lines to make the point appear more clearly, but it's drawn with the same pen.
The problem of attaining trust from within anonymity is a interesting one, but the simple solution sounds to be to just have the directory servers make a consensus over what registry should be used as default. The tor network already depend on the directory servers, and if the registry ever get compromised the directory operators can always change the consensus. If a single directory operator get legal problems, the other operators consensus will override any recourse that may happen.
Thank you, hadn't caught that. Will definitely add more graphs for frameworks and other things in future versions.
> I've seen conflicting data

That's called the "wishful thinking" fallacy, to which you cling to confirm your previous "investment." If we'd look at your sources of the apparent "conflicting" data, we'd be able to see that they are intentionally biased, fabricated, cherry picked or whatever. But I would be surprised that you accept that fact, on average it doesn't function that way psychologically. Which is how humans work, but not a scientific argument.

Anyway, the natural processes, unless cataclysmic, don't make such rapid changes that we experience now. The speed of the change is orders of magnitude faster now than the non-cataclysmic natural ones. It is really going to be worse than most can even imagine. Our children or grandchildren are going to hate us for not doing enough. The politicians and lobbyists who only see their own benefit will be dead and won't care.

To compare with the "good old times": the study of human DNA shows that 70000 years ago, only 2000 humans survived one extinction event:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/2975862.stm

And then there was no civilization infrastructure to fail, just the hunter-gatherers, ready to move.
Are there plans for django 2.0 to support asynchronous processing like in http://aiohttp.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ ?
Everybody suggests celery as an asynchrone task queue, but i dont see how to resolve a http request with it. Will this come with python 3 because the async/await syntax introduced by PEP 492 is only valid for Python 3.5+ ?
A Gentle Introduction to Higher Order Components in React
May be this, or may be not: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QaSFffngtys

Unforgettable moment.
A la Loma de Belén...
de Belén nos vamos,
A la Loma de Belén...
de Belén nos vamos,
ahé... ehá...
ahé... componedores,
ahé...remachadores...
Y yo voy a La Loma...
buscándote...

A la Loma de Belén...
de Belén nos vamos,
A la Loma de Belén...
de Belén nos vamos,
ahé... ehá...
ahé...componedores,
ahé...remachadores...
Y yo voy a La Loma...
buscándote...

Sau...Sau...pa...enganchado,
Sau...sau...
Los componedores,
Sau...Sau...pa...enganchado,
Sau...sau...
Los remachadores...
Sau...Sau...pa...enganchado,
Sau...sau...
Subo...La Loma...
Sau...Sau...pa...enganchado,
Sau...sau...
o bajo La Loma...
Sau...Sau...pa...enganchado,
Sau...sau...
voy para el llano...
Sau...Sau...pa...enganchado,
Sau...sau...

Enganchado...
como una percha,
Enganchado...
como un pescado,
Enganchado...
como un perchero,
Enganchado...
con bacalao,
Enganchado...
yo de mi negra estoy,
Enganchado...

de asustadera,
Enganchado...
de su boquita,
Enganchado...
y su melao,
Enganchado...
de eso que tiene...
Enganchado...
entreverado,
Enganchado...
mira como yo estoy,
Enganchado...
descocotado,
Enganchado...
como un vagón,
Enganchado...
estoy enganchado,
Enganchado...
es que esa negra,
Enganchado...
tiene melao,
Enganchado...
Sau...sau...mal enganchado...
So how did the developer knew it was a toxic individual ? his account has exactly 1 post on the forum which is the one that got him banned.
I guess that depends on your wifi. I have a heavy concrete construction, so with my car in the driveway I still wouldn't get wifi - let alone on the street, if I want it to open in time to pull straight in.

(for the actual value of this, I guess you'd have to ask the people who bought it. But replacing your 'clicker' with your phone, does appear to be the entire goal of the product - and "not in wifi range" could mean 100 meters away just as easily as 100 miles away)
I think the problem the movie crew faced, was that GitS basically needs something like the Marvel Universe stretching to retell the story. Most of the episodes of GitS2 would have made for a Stand Alone movie.
So what to do?
The original is in particular running against the usual hollywood conventions. There is no visible villain, until late, then the villian turns out to be a grey area guy, hunted by other grey area guys.

>the culture series is longing for a movie

Honestly, i hate it when book SciFi gets put into movie shape. Its rarely looks like i imagined it.
Speed reading tips from a CEO
Thank you, will be adding that in next versions.
Especially so for DNS servers, and since long before the google nameservers[0].

[0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3258
Use Source Insight as the editor to develop Unix softwares
I agree with most of this post but Solaris is truly painful to watch. A five minute long shot of a freeway is really pushing the line between "slow, subtle artistry" and "banal, cheaply produced filler" (and yes, I'm aware Tarkovsky said it was to get rid of impatient viewers). Also I found the unexplained usage of dwarfs for no reason other than to add "weirdness" questionable.
Configuring Private DNS Zones and Upstream Nameservers in Kubernetes
2016 Global and Chinese Florfenicol (CAS 73231-34-2) Industry
HelloFresh | Frontend, Full Stack, Backend | Berlin | Onsite | Visa

We are the leading global company in the expanding online recipe kit delivery market. This is a unique opportunity to gain valuable and challenging experience at a rapidly growing startup. Responsibility is given from day one to use your initiative and creativity to help us grow our business. We are fast-paced and love the food world.

We're looking for Full stack, Frontend and Backend Engineers who are keen to gain exposure to a modern stack and work as part of a team of exceptional engineers.

For more info about our culture and projects check out our Engineering blog at: https://engineering.hellofresh.com

For our stack check out our Stackshare at: https://stackshare.io/hellofresh/hellofresh-com

We work with PHP, Go, Docker, React.JS/Redux, Angular.JS, and are currently transitioning towards a microservice focused approach.

If you're keen to join our team, please apply using the appropriate link (so we know you came from HackerNews!):

Full Stack: http://grnh.se/e3m2ki1

Frontend: http://grnh.se/5yd3vc1

Backend: http://grnh.se/p4s6yu1
> commercial companies deliver services much more efficiently than governments and bureaucracies.

That is often true, but the efficiency comes from competition in a free market, not the ownership of the service provider.

The government usually has a monopoly, so there is little pressure to be efficient other than the personal motivation of some government employees to improve life in their city.

If there are instead 5 service providers who compete for customers, then they are forced to be efficient or lose their business.

But if there is just one commercial company with an effective monopoly - due to mergers between all providers in an area, poorly structured contracts, or plain old corruption - then there is no pressure to be efficient either.
Carlota Perez on a tech-driven golden age ahead
Dunno. The Tsunami killed upwards of 15000 people. I don't have figures, but I am sure that a good number of these were not killed by the wave directly, but by technical contraptions that failed, crushed them or what have you.

One of these many technical contraptions that was damaged/destroyed by the Tsunami was the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Yet, so far not a single person has been killed as a result of that failure, and so far the predictions are that future deaths will be so low as to disappear into the statistical noise. (And these predictions tend to be on the high side: the WHO created reports every decade after Chernobyl, and each report massively revised those estimates downwards).

Yet, all we ever hear about is Fukushima.

Odd. That.
Blue Green Deployments with Azure – The Simple Way
List of artificial objects on the Moon
Not always. It's possible to bury yourself under so much technical debt that you can't get out from under it. To extend the metaphor, you can end up spending all your revenue merely servicing the debt and you cannot invest in paying it down. Your system can be so flawed that it hampers innovation, and requires ongoing costly maintenance and support which eats up all of your dev resources. The end result is that innovation is blocked off for you and if you run into a bump that reduces your review significantly for a while you can easily end up bankrupt.
Why they don't explore such an obvious approach to improving usability as various graphical representations of onion addresses? It works for security verification codes in WhatsApp, Telegram etc., it should also work for onion addresses.
destroying public transit? Most suburbs never have public transit to begin with! Mine didnt, and it doesn't sound like Insifil had much either. They couldnt even justify 2 busses.
An irony I've noticed recently is fans of nuclear saying: "Coal is killing people, if you say anything bad about Nuclear then you are killing people" and then turning round and attacking other, non-coal alternatives like wind, solar or even natural gas.

Initially I assumed these were actually coal supporters doing some devious concern trolling to delay the roll out of alternatives that are viable in the short term but I've come to accept that it's just another weird nerd-war like Emacs Vs Vi, except with deadlier real life consequences.
> He's asking for a standard

We have predictable standards codified in statute and case law. Most cases settle predictably. A few make new law. These receive disproportionate media attention because they are defining edge cases. It doesn't matter if your law is in code or text at that point. If you have an investigatory law saying "books and papers," and a prosecutor seizes an iPhone, you have to produce new law.

This ambiguity is a product of mapping heterogeneity between abstract concepts and the real world. There will never be agreement on what all words mean. "Is this a chair? Yes. Is that a chair? No, it's art. Who says? Let's debate." That is a product of language.

> which aren't actually written down or encoded anywhere

Here's a random, recent Supreme Court opinion [1]. I don't have a legal background; I find it highly readable. Furthermore, the citations are pretty easy to follow.

> anyone who would be in a position to see that and write those down usually has a job instead acting as an oracle machine

Not everyone trained in law is a legislator. (Or judge.) Many legislators, judges, lawyers, professors, students and random people opine on the law in books, blogs and other materials. This is a public debate. When courts face an edge case, lawyers from both sides cite these materials. After that, once a precedent is set (and recorded), it is respected until a new edge case arises or the statute is revised by the political system.

[1] https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/14-9496_8njq.pdf
OP mentions that he received NSOs, not ISOs, so he would not be subject to AMT. He also wouldn't be taxed at capital gains rates on exercise but rather the spread would be taxed as regular compensation income. More info is available here: https://www.nceo.org/articles/stock-options-alternative-mini...
My biggest problem is in "no need to get fancy". Do not know how to overcome that urge to overengineer everything in the start and how to be satisfied with minimal working thing even if it looks like crap.
In fact PGO will probably help you find out where to add those aliasing checks!

Whole program optimization could help though.
I know Microsoft contributed Coroutines to LLVM and now experimental in 4.0.0 and .Net core.

Which is even awesome for Microsoft to adopt LLVM.
Do you have any experience with this?
> So minifying your stuff will only help you a little.

True, the difference between 10KB compressed and 7KB minified+compressed is negligible for your visitors, but it still takes 30% off of your traffic bill.
Fake Amazon Prime Video on Google Play? Could You Really Spot the Difference?
This is what I'm doing also. Anything I want to access externally can be reached via an mqtt server running on an el-cheapo VPS.

No small irony (to me) that what simply the easiest method for me, is also one I can replace or migrate in a heartbeat. It's a shame there's no commercial offerings that do the same - there's not many vendors at all I trust to not sunset their service while I'm still using it.

(even giants that can afford it. I've been through dotmac / mobileme and now icloud on Apple, email has been the only service I've used for 10 years without being discontinued. Buying in to home improvements where I can't expect 10 years, isn't something I'm comfortable with)
The Republican Identity Crisis
Don't forget that gzip/brotli only affects the shipping time. This would be the process:

1. Server: check Accept-encoding header for gzip or brotili support
2. Server: compress either brotli or gzipped file, or fall back to a raw file
3. Server: send data to client
4. Client: receive (and decompress, if not raw)
5. Client: parse (big) resource

Also, compression through uglifying/minifying improves parse speed, which is really helpful on (old) mobile devices. Adding compression through gzip or brotli introduces additional overhead, because the uncompressing step will be in-memory and stalls the processing of the file.
Updated – 6 JavaScript Frameworks/Libraries to Look for in 2017
Yes. I expect manned fighter jets will become obsolete within 20 years. A few thoughts on the subject:

1. Drones can handle much higher G-forces than manned fighter jets. This is a huge advantage.

2. AI technology is progressing very rapidly so there will soon be no benefit to having a human in the aircraft. Even today the US military probably has AI that can beat any human in a simulated dogfight.

3. Pilots are very expensive. Not just to train but also in terms of the political cost of having pilots killed or captured by the enemy.

4. Eliminating the pilot opens up a range of options. For example, instead of a $200 million fighter jet it may be more effective to build 10 drones for $20 million each, or even 100 drones for $2 million each. Maybe half the drones will have stealth capabilities and half will have AWCS-like communication and control features.

5. During WWII German and Russian tanks were roughly equivalent. But the Russians could build tanks at a far greater rate than the Germans, making the German loss almost inevitable. Similarly, in future the country that can produce many drones quickly and cheaply may dominate air warfare. In this regard China will likely have an advantage over the US.

6. The military-industrial complex is a huge bureaucracy in which many people have a financial and psychological incentive to continue development of manned fighter jets. For this reason I expect such development to continue well beyond its use-by date, probably until there is a real-world battle where a large, previously dominant air force is soundly beaten by a small power using new drone technology.
That's why I think it could still be done right. In a world where Riddick was big, Dune can sell. They're both compelling for similar reasons.
Doomsday Prep for Non-Paranoid People
single field?

what about `unique_together` and `index_together`?
> certain members of the Rust community

Fortunately the overwhelming majority of the community isn't afraid to call this post out, judging by the comments at https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/63ijkw/rust_optimizat... :) I've never seen the author engage with the Rust community in any great capacity (they're not a regular in any forum that I frequent, and I can't name any libraries that they've written), so I wish he'd take the time to learn Rust more before blogging about it.