skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So while I previously had regarded the MIT license as the one to generally use for any project where one has decided not to go the copyleft route, this guy seems to be saying it's fine but Apache 2.0, being a little clearer about some edge cases, is the best of all permissive licenses and the one that should ideally be used.

The FSF https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-recommendations.html seems to agree with that.

Can we take that conclusion away and go with it henceforth? Are there any downsides to it at all?
Many, many years ago there were already FSFE presentations by lawyers who encouraged everyone to prefer AGPL to GPL, because in most applications this is closer to what you actually want.

- GPL wants to care about the users, but actually cares only about those who install the software on their computer. Back then, these groups were identical, but in the time of remote applications (web apps, services, etc.) this means: The owner of the server, not the end user, receives the rights granted by GPL.

- AGPL actually does care about the users, no matter how they interact with your application. The rights given by the AGPL are granted to everybody down the chain.

Of course, this line of thinking only applies if you want a strong copyleft license. If you want non-copyleft, e.g. for very small projects, just stick with the ISC license (which is a more modern and slightly shorter version of MIT license).
Surface+Book+with+Performance+Base:+More+power+and+more+endurance
>> I have a huge problem with the way some animals are tagged and tracked

> What is the issue with this?

Totally off-topic, not going to start a discussion on it, sorry.
Why are you being downvoted?

https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01386/30/DNS-over-TLS.html

This article shows how to set it up according to ISC with stunnel.

I was hoping for a native implementation in Bind but maybe it's coming.
This software helps you to capture leads. With presentations
It also depends very much the geometric complexity of your scene. With hundreds of millions of polygons it's not difficult for raytracing to outperform rasterization, especially if most of those polygons are instanced.
Ask HN: What's your troubles or concerns in front-end dev in the past year?
I saw the React community going toward a direction we have typed languages, heavy use of components, more powerful engines, while there are also other communities developing their own technical stacks.

So what's your concerns? What you need specifically for you projects or your company?
No one knows for now, as refurbishment costs are a big unknown (and I don't think SpaceX will release those numbers at this point). The cost of the first stage is a significant part of the overall rocket cost, though, considering it's the largest part, and it has 90 % of the engines (each of which costs about a million already).

Since they took four months to refurbish this stage it may have cost quite a bit to do so for now. But they're learning and Block 5 to debut later this year will have lots of changes based on what they learned.
methane fuel is what we desperately need now, methane is the number one danger to our atmosphere and burning it is the most ecofriendly way of disposing of it.
What do you mean fall into the command line ?

The better half of my computer use happens in the command line interface, way more efficient use of my time.
this is smart, find out which sites give you revenue then trim.

if only we could get Chase's list it would save others a lot of money.
The downside is that it's not compatible with projects that are strictly GPL 2.0. Rust is dual-licensed under both Apache 2 and MIT for this reason.
> Feudalism is "you can farm here but you owe me and your promise to fight in my wars".

+ if you will marry, I have every right to fuck your new wife on your wedding night, just before you. with church blessing. good luck figuring our if your first kid is yours or not. or having happy marriage.

+ I can kill you, anytime, for no reason, without consequence, horribly slow. or whole village. the only motivation to not do so is losing a bit of wealth since you all are my property, nothing more. but sometimes I can afford to lose a bit of property, just for the fun of it.

> Really? Is it terrifying to compare a vassal's contract with the "work for me in the warehouse and I'll pay you a minimum wage, if you don't like, there is a line waiting at the door". They are not the same, it's a bit silly but is that sending shivers down our spine?

WTF? there is a whole world to discover, to (re)define yourself, endless amounts of activities/job to take if really wanted/needed. you are FREE to choose your own fate. even building next amazon if you can do it. your skills and sky is the only real limit. so yes, comparing those 2 sends shivers down my spine too, since this is just envy. don't blame some rich guy for wrong choices earlier in your life (ie what to study).

don't forget, horrible things like communism are built on envy and sense of entitlement.
This looks like a great option to validate the seed IP's used to connect to the bitcoin p2p network have not been tampered with. As would be possible with a plain text DNS lookup.
Or to express it another way, a variable with 3 possible states has 0.5 bits more capacity than one with 2.
Oh yeh, because creating a startup is a breeze isn't it ? And most anyone could simply drop every commitment in their lives and like 4 years later they're rich! Why doesn't everyone do that, given they're free to do it ? Well, because they're not free to, not at all.

90% of people are strapped into financial obligations and have families. None of these people can afford to risk starting a business, even if they would be good at it and had the money, support and contacts required. Even among the usually already wealthy people who can afford to risk a startup, 90% of them fail.

What you're really saying is: if you inherited the freedom to risk creating a startup, and you are one of the lucky 10% who make it a success, then you deserve to enjoy the rewards.
A self submitted opinion blog post pretty much entirely wrong ending up on HN front page. What gives ?
its been ripped down :-(
One up for the Steve Jobs video.
The Apache 2.0 license isn't compatible with the GPLv2 (according to the FSF's compatibility list), whereas MIT is -- that may or may not be important to you. Apache 2.0 is compatible with GPLv3, and thus also with GPLv2-or-later code (in the latter case the combined work will end up under gpl3, obviously).
It's pretty common for people to make a hard problem out to be much more difficult than it actually is if they have a track record of failing to tackle it. The reality is that the problem is not that terribly difficult, all things considered. That's not to diminish SpaceX's achievement, what they've done is genius. But their genius is primarily in avoiding falling into the common trap of optimizing an expendable rocket to the detriment of any hope of easy and beneficial reuse of part of it. And indeed the most logical optimizations of expendable rockets tend to push the design in precisely that direction, so it takes a considerable amount of sticktoitiveness to avoid that pitfall. Additionally, they figured out how to do reusable R&D very effectively and cheaply (by using commercial launches to subsidize most of the costs).

Together this has led them to success, but any space-faring nation or organization with a few billion dollars sitting around could have achieved the same thing, they just didn't have the courage or foresight to do so. Indeed, Blue Origin will probably follow along and reproduce the same achievement in orbital rocketry within the next 5 or 10 years or so. And I expect others to follow as well, once a model that can be easily copied has become established and its advantages proven.
Important doesn't equal or imply smart nor being good at what you do.
He is sarcastic. But it's also a false dichotomy. It is different from taking things by force. There is in general mutual benefit between all involved parties.

Though that doesn't mean we can just completely relax. We should stay vigilant, because tyranny is always just around the corner.
Strange document. I don't get why Lawyers would be bothered by the GPL or the MIT licenses... in 2017 !

As a Lawyer myself, I am certainly not. Free Software and Open Source Licenses are a great way for developers to get protected, worldwide, at a very low cost - and to achieve their goals and values besides their software itself.
Disruptive Innovation: Is Your Business Ready?
This brings back very fond memories of high school. I think we have about 4 of these for a school of several hundred students. We would make a booking and stay back after school to write our programs in BASIC and assembly. Thank you to the developers, you made my day.

The model before this (was it the version II?) had a terrible keybounce problem - it was almost usable.

Later we were lucky enough to get a Compucolor II. I still have the manual from 1979 here on my bookshelf.
> Grover Norquist, the well known promoter of the "Taxpayer Protection Pledge" took the counterintuitive view that just making the process easier equated to a new tax, since taxpayers might end up paying taxes already on the books that they might have previously unintentionally evaded.

I just fail to understand the logic exercised by some US residents. Norquist's argument is insane, and if you're not only trying to be kind to it and not call it as such, your stance towards it seems insane to me too.
>equivalent ballots have different meaning

Isn't this just a fundamental problem with voting? In FPTP, one voter might not like the candidate they vote for as much as someone else, or in a ranked system, someone might like their 1st and 2nd choices a lot more than their 3rd choice.

We give everyone's vote equal weight, and they can decide how to use that. Within that constraint Range Voting gives people the most freedom to express their true preferences.
You also have to remember that these rockets are going to land on Mars, and we're not going to be able to set up a runway before they arrive, so landing vertically is a necessity.
I am skeptical to its architecture. This is 2017 and there are compelling reasons for endpoints to do resolving on their own. To get rid of open resolvers would be nice.

"But .. caching", well, the performance of resolvers is perhaps not as clear cut as that. Performance would suffer for some, but they can clearly handle it, and does it really matter?

Some real world testing would surely be beneficial. In the mean time, I'm not sure about solutions to the resolver data leak problem. It is a solution to a problem we should not have.
Aaron Swartz on reading Noam Chomsky for the first time
Yeah, when your karma is high enough. I don't know what the amount is that leads to downvote enlightenment though.
Indeed, with hundreds of millions of polygons, a rasterisation method will generally have to splat them all onto the screen one by one (minus some clever occlusion pre-processing). By contrast, a ray-tracer has the ability to shove all the objects into a R-tree or kd-tree, and efficiently search for only those objects that intersect the ray, and produce the objects in guaranteed order of distance from the camera.
If you're using Emacs already, just use Org-mode to write your documents and C-c Ce l p, i.e. export to pdf through latex. I use a combination of Org-mode and xelatex, and it works like a charm. Just set up `org-latex-classes' to your templates if necessary, then:

;; See: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2014-05/msg00198.html
(let
((xelatex "xelatex -shell-escape -interaction nonstopmode -output-directory %o %f")
(biber "biber -u -U %b"))
(setf org-latex-pdf-process
(list xelatex xelatex biber xelatex)))

and go.
> You are reading things into my comments.

You appear to have forgotten to read your first comment:

"This thread may grow long and maybe turn to the topic of HTTPS. SSL with SNI exposes plaintext hostnames/domainnames on the wire for anyone to read, aggregate and sell, not to mention tamper with. It should be an optional extension. For many users it adds no benefit. For some users, it breaks their software and adds needless complexity. Now the privacy advocates have a reason to dislike it too. Just say no to SNI."

The grammatical form of the last sentence is called imperative[0]. It is not a misnomer. The previous sentence quantifies over "privacy advocates". The first tells people who are not you what to do, the previous one tells people who are not you what they have reason to believe. You were the first person "telling others what software to use" in this thread.

[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperative_mood
UX Strategy Canvas: A Handy Tool to Review and Update Your UX Strategy
چشم اندازی به زیبای های استان گلستان
It's still not clear to me what problem is Server Push solving. If it's early delivery of associated resources (css for html page) then the client could already have a cached copy of that CSS (e.g. previous visit). It's possible for the client to cancel PUSH_PROMISE but then the server could have already sent some data. So it's double work for both the client and the server.

I'd be personally interested in having programmatic access from Javascript to pushed resources (maybe emulating Websocket?).
And the magic pixie dust of dual-licensing appears to be that you don't need to immediately select one license or the other: you can simply assume a superposition of both licenses until such time as someone decides to sue you for license-related reasons (which is to say, you remain in this superposition for basically eternity), at which point you could just point to one and say, "aha, look, we've been using this one all along". It's the sort of thing that feels like it shouldn't fly, but yet I don't think it's ever been challenged and at least Mozilla (which tri-licenses Firefox) appears to be fine with it.
Right, and once everyone is used to life without internet let's go all the way back to a hunter-gatherer life so we're safe from extortionist practices made possible by other entrenched oligopolies that defeat market mechanisms.

I have to wonder why government regulation is to be avoided at all cost when it comes to consumer protection whilst the very existence of corporations, their property rights and hence markets themselves is owed entirely to government regulation.

I am very much in favor of using market mechanisms to solve as many problems as we can, because if and when markets work they solve a very complex coordination problem that is extremely hard to replace with planning. But to claim that markets can solve every problem including their own dysfunction is just logically nonsensical.
Does anyone know where I can find a completely offline tool that does what this site does?

The source for this seems like a bit of overkill. I'd like to be able to use a cli based tool that shows me relevant man sections for the flags I chose for example
I wouldn't stress too hard. US politics has always been like this. Slavery and then later civil rights are the two biggest examples. As long as there are those who keep up the Good Fight change does happen.
iSkysoft IMedia Converter Deluxe Crack with Registration Code Free
Here are some great resources to get a quick software license overview and help making a decision:

* https://tldrlegal.com/

* https://choosealicense.com/
Good point. It does seem within our engineering ability to live inside a habitat on Mars, true.

When I wrote that comment I guess I was probably thinking habitable in a similar way to Earth. Possible to thrive on the surface under ambient conditions.
Well, this one won't land on Mars unless it launches from there (which is unlikely to happen). But they're gathering experience and knowledge about how to do propulsive landings and the technique as such doesn't care much about an atmosphere. Dragon v2 and the ITS spaceship will both use propulsive landing and those will end up on Mars.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baikal_(rocket_booster) Here is a Wiki article on it. Reverse: it was supposed to use engine from Mig-29 and wheels from Yak-40 :) Anyway, it never went anywhere beyond mockup stage.
> You can't send a DVD or a book instantaneously around the world, but you can with a digital copy. This means there is a lower bound to how fast you can share a physical copy, so the practical effect of the ability to share a book has a limit. There is no such limit with digital goods.

Then expand my "1 device at a time" limit to "each media can only be used by one device, after use it’s locked to that device for 24h".

In 24h I can ship a DVD from any place to any other place on the world with DHL.

One of the most important policies of the digital market is that it should be a strict superset of the real market, allowing 1:1 all things the physical world does, and more.

If the digital market has additional restrictions, then those have to be removed, no matter how.

The EU already requires by law that you can lend out a product you own, physical or digital, resell it, or refund it. Unless companies like Google allow these things in the same (or a more lenient) way as in the physical world by themselves, there will be more laws enforcing this.
https://www.rs-online.com/designspark/daedalus-the-jet-engin... for an interview with the inventor and link to working youtube video.
Ah! That probably is important actually; aren't some big projects, including the Linux kernel, GPL2 and going to remain so?
> An example: if you do a Google search for "Amazon <some book>" then you'll almost always get an ad from Amazon. So Amazon pays for a click that would have happened anyway

This is absolutely understood, and in fact deliberate. Amazon does not want another advertiser sitting above their top position in the organics. It weakens mind share, and risks losing a click.
The FSF recommends Apache 2.0 for small projects where the hassle of free software is not worth it.
I read it as "mostly only in use in or around Perl code" (not that it could not be used elsewhere, it just turns out it mostly isn't).
The Lisp machine and GNU
> All I can recall is few absurd billboards like "Fly Aeroflot!" (the only airline)

There were many airlines (from different countries) flying to and from the USSR.
Looks plausible, compare to:

https://www.startengine.com/startup/jetpack-aviation

Using 2 AMT Nike turbines at 80 kgf each (these are big)

So 6 smaller turbines (eg: AMT Olympus) at 23 kgf looks good.

That said - I'd not want to be waving 800 degree C things spinning at 100K RPM anywhere near my body.

Edit: I suspect he is using JetCat turbines of appropriate size: http://www.jetcat.de/jetcatturbinen/strahlturbinen.htm
Musk is a nice example. He probably would've started the same, but Tesla and SpaceX wouldn't have existed / been the same as today.

Remember that at some point Musk had poured all his wealth into those companies and they were one failure away from bankruptcy. If Musk had any less money after PayPal, he couldn't have done what he did.
ThoughtWorks Technology Radar March 2017 [pdf]
UK SME Insurance Market product details research report to 2016
This is one of those concerns: http://www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/how-team-of-pre-...

I think Snowden put it best: "Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." - even if you have nothing to say, you no longer get to listen to those who would have otherwise been able to speak.

Not only does surveillance increase the risks to you if you're a whistleblower, it also deprives you of all the information potential whistleblowers would have provided, before the increased risk of getting caught convinced them to stay silent.

And you may have "nothing to hide" (untrue for >90% of the population, but lets go with it), but many people doing good work, that you will benefit from, will be severely hampered by surveillance. People such as investigative reporters, whistleblowers, various activist lawyers investigating e.g. employee/prisoner mistreatment or environmental contamination by negligent companies, etc.
Presumably in order to notice when/if it's cashed?
If the achievable "self-replicating global technology/manufacturing stack" is as broken as current OSs, we'll be fine.
It’s actually both. The site determines what categories of ads can be displayed, and the viewer profile determines which in those categories will be actually shown.
There's this thing called the economy, full of private entities, all transacting throughout the year, creating wealth, expanding the money supply, generating a bit of inflation, and so on.

Yes, the fiscal multiplier is important, but simple problems like corruption (regulatory capture and federal/state/county/municipality contracts to clients) and (very) unequal accumulation of wealth leading to serious power inequality seem more relevant today.
Too bad visitor counter doesn't work. It's interesting how back in the day lot of sites had visitor counters displayed. Still wondering why this was done, possibly because this was the only way author could see the count of his visitors himself.

Edit: typo.
This controversy seems overblown to me. It would have been nice if these rules had gone into effect as scheduled, but let's remember that they never actually did. So nothing has been lost - ISP's have gained no new abilities, despite how the extremely biased media coverage I have seen of this paints the situation. They have been able to sell aggregated targeting data forever, and will be able to continue doing so.

This article is actually somewhat encouraging, in that it displays the limits of the laws as they exist today and will apparently remain. You cannot go buy the browsing histories of specific individuals - enemies, employees, etc. Many of the ridiculous "sky is falling" leaps of fact and logic that have been portrayed in the media to get views (ironically so that they can make money from displaying targeted advertising on articles decrying it) have been disproved by this article.
Using Deep Learning to model personal visual aesthetics
I often look at the huge companies advertising on my site and think "if they could see where their ads are being placed right now they'd probably realize they're wasting their money"

But are they? If they're paying per click, completely uninterested visitors won't cost them anything anyway. As dkuebric pointed out, we have no idea if those 395k sites were actually costing them any significant amount of money.
More About External WIFI Adapter
Addendum to “Curl is C”
Was the way that inequality was achieved ever the only problem? Is inequality in itself a social ill? Inequality achieved through socially accepted means is still inequality. I'm not advocating Harrison Bergeron levels of flattening here, but there has got to be diminishing returns on the utility of extreme wealth which could better be used to help the uber poor.
The irony is that it's Erd\H{o}s
I guess the fact that it hasn't been done so far is in part due to lack of technology (bot materials and processing power) and the lack of necessity. Space programs have been purely national affairs for a long time and cost for the rather few launches was not really an issue. Even more so when the launcher was developed off ICBMs where development costs were already paid for with a military budget.

And, well, as long as no cheaper competitor comes along it doesn't matter if launch prices are high since whoever needs to launch something just has to pay them.
Easy way to publish?
Sorry! I would have done if I'd had Dutch friends.
Recover Lost Data from Android After Factory Reset
you are clearly envy-trolling but I'll bite - if things like education, portable device with access to all of human knowledge so far, buy clothing, basic equipment to your hourse/apartment, sporting equipment, buy camera to capture your happy moments for rest of your life, enjoy your favorite movies and so on... yes, it improves lives a bit or more, on super-massive scale.
Vodafone Reavled Galaxy S8 and S8+ Price Details in Europe