skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
And also iOS, Android, and a native web browser backend via Emscripten :)

This was a proposal/prototype/intro video for IUP for iOS & Android for the IUP community.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UvrEfOg3Nyk

Repos:

https://github.com/ewmailing/IupCocoaTouch

https://github.com/ewmailing/IupAndroid

https://github.com/ewmailing/IupEmscripten
I've built several angular apps and I've never had this issue in any of my applications. So no, while it's so popular to shame Angular lately this isn't an Angular problem.
Maybe a repository and pull requests could be a way to facilitate it. If there was another trusted party with commit rights it would not be so much on you.

Or not.
It's a come to Jesus moment.
Ah. Correct. Thanks.
Homeless Dev looking for work
Hey folks,

Became homeless recently and I have been afforded the unique opportunity to move anywhere in the states.

Where should a junior-ish full stack dev go?
Well, it focuses on him because he's President now.

Sure, Obama was an authoritarian bastard. But why do we think that Trump won't be one? Has he, for example, stopped assassinating random foreigners based on often iffy metadata?
Another Loss for Broadcast TV Streaming, and a Dangerous Shift of Power
No, I die. <- period
Learn to Lead Before You Wish to Manage
> Symantec has publicly and strongly committed to Certificate Transparency (CT) logging for Symantec certificates and is one of the few CAs that hosts its own CT servers.

Lol.

This is like being court-ordered to do community support and then bragging about all the volunteering you do. Symantec was forced by Google to do CT. See https://security.googleblog.com/2015/10/sustaining-digital-c... , specifically:

> Therefore we are firstly going to require that as of June 1st, 2016, all certificates issued by Symantec itself will be required to support Certificate Transparency.

(By the end of this year, all CAs will be forced to do CT, but Symantec was forced into this last year, because of the stupid shit they keep doing)
I am a tab hoarder and cannot survive without https://www.one-tab.com/
You have to model sending a message across the cluster as marshaling into a binary form and unmarshaling it again. I don't mean that you "should" model it that way... you have to model it that way, because that's what is happening. Therefore, when receiving a message, you really only ever get a Maybe Message or Either Message Error or whatever you want to model it as. The act of marshaling the message back into the local representation is also when you check it for whether it conforms to the type restrictions you think it should have.

Because you must already model this as a process that can fail, I don't think it does break the static typing model at all. In fact I routinely "statically type" messages coming from things that were actually emitted by dynamic languages!

What gets tricky is if you try to model this as a process that can't fail. But the problem there isn't static typing, it's a specific instance of the general principle that you can not build robust systems based on the principle that networks can't fail.

I also think this is an instance of the general misunderstanding about static types, which I understand deeply because I once held it, that static types somehow prevent errors. They don't. What they do is provide a gateway that says "in order to get into this type, you must meet these criteria, and the compiler is going to statically check that you've verified these criteria". A static typing system doesn't force things through that gateway, it forces you to check whether things fit through that gateway, and do something with the things that don't. Then, it also allows you to strictly declare that everything that uses that type is statically checked to be "behind" that gateway, so there are no other ways around it to get in, thus creating a space in which you can count on the fact that the values have been checked for certain properties and you can now write code that counts on those without constantly checking them. A statically typed system faced with the task of, say, parsing a number out of a string, does not prevent a user from sending me a string of "xyz"; it just prevents me from just sending it through the system as-is.
I REALLY need to stop backing projects. It's almost getting ridiculous how many board games are coming my way this year. Kingdom Death was craziness.
I'm sorry about your situation, but I think the people telling you "it'll be fine" are creating a reality you're not going to see. That being said, you can still see success in your career (with tech, primarily) that exceed most non-felon people in the United States in terms of wages. However, when you get to this point, you'll realize that you would've succeeded even more had you not been a felon. Anyway, I digress.

Some notes from talking to hiring managers at my company:

1. I suspect HR just passes on felons directly during the application phase. What this means for you is that you need to bypass this. So if you pursue tech, networking is going to become super crucial for you.

2. Something like crime would prove to be a tie-breaker if things are hard to judge. Given the lack of objectivity during tech interviews, this will put you at a disadvantage. In order to get your foot in the door, I would try to a "big fish in a small pond." Meaning, apply at smaller companies, non-profits, etc. Places where tech isn't the primary focus and show value.

3. I assume you've seen this site [1]. I was reading an article a long time ago and saw it referenced. Hopefully it can be of use to you.

4. What I would strongly recommend is just becoming as good as you can, building your network as indicated in (1) and just contract and freelance. You know much better than I do. The discrimination against you for being a felon (even if it's non-violent) is offensive.

[1] https://exoffenders.net/
The thesis is good. But like many of Adam Curtis's documentaries this can feel like it takes too long to get to the point. For the curious (and montage averse) the Chapo Trap House podcast had an interview with Adam Curtis (Episode 65) in which the thesis was outlined much faster, and in more amusing fashion.
The Funnel Plot Is Invalid Because of This Crazy Assumption: R(n,d)=0
Stream Ambient Music PlayList Deep Sounds from the Lightest Side
I use these everyday, they better have flags to re-enable them. Would be annoying to have to drag a tab to a new window and close the other window.
Sounds like a straw man, just because South Korea made a mistake doesn't mean legislating a standard is bad.
Just yesterday there was a big discussion on here about how academic papers needlessly complicate simple ideas. Mainly by replacing nice explanations with impenetrable math notation in an attempt to seem more formal. This paper is very guilty of this.

E.g. page 5. They attempt to explain a really simple idea, that they generated images of random lines at a random angle. Then labelled the lines positive or negative examples, based on whether the angle was greater than 90 degrees or not. Then they take sets of these examples. And label them based on whether they contain an even or odd number of positive examples.

They take several paragraphs over half a page to explain this. Filled with dense mathematical notation. If you don't know what symbols like U, :, ->, or ~ mean, you are screwed because that's not googleable. It takes way longer to parse than it should. Especially since I just wanted to quickly skim the ideas, not painfully reverse engineer them.

Hell, even the concept of even or odd, is pointlessly redefined and complicated as multiplying + or - 1's together. I was scratching my head for a few minutes just trying to figure out what the purpose of that was. It's like reading bad code without any comments. Even if you are very familiar with the language and know what the code does, it takes a lot of effort to figure out why it's that way. If it's not explained properly.

The worst part is, no one ever complains about this stuff because they are afraid of looking stupid. I sure fear that by posting this very comment. I actually am familiar with the notation used in this example. I still find it unnecessary and exhausting to decode.
I think you're mixing up real work with fake work :) I've found that working on anything that doesn't distract and derail effectively kills the creative spirit. While I'm not at the top of anything, I'm guessing that the people you mention find their work distracting and derailing enough to stay awake.
If there’s one organization that should have known how difficult it is to make software work right, it’s Microsoft. It is disturbing that Microsoft either couldn’t see any of this coming, or just didn’t care what would happen when a significant number of people have their lives turned upside down.

It is even worse when you consider how many billions of dollars they continue to make by selling software. If you can take all that money, you should be willing to spend some of that money to make experiences that are actually worth all that money.

And this wasn’t even that hard to predict. It’s clear that caution is advisable in any updating system simply because there are too many possible combinations of hardware and user apps: there are too many things that can go wrong. You need to assume that a particular user’s combination might not be something you anticipated so the user should be in control of whether and when to update. And yet, they didn’t keep users in control; they didn’t update things carefully on a side copy; and Windows 10 even had the audacity to outright delete things that it deemed unnecessary. On top of it all, instead of taking baby steps, they changed just about every damned thing that was possible to change in Windows! And if even that wasn’t enough, they basically lied to the user using language like how it would always be possible to go back, everything would be preserved, etc.
Every UI for every product is managed independently by each product team, if you look at the source, some are angular, some are plain HTML and some are backbone.
Are there any objective looks at this? I know personally I manually check the spam folder, and out of the hundreds of messages a month that end up there I've never seen anything important get mis-categorised. A few (<<1%) mass emails end up there inadvertently, but nothing that I would notice if I didn't check.
I find that hard to believe.... 15000 cores is only 1000 16 core serversand my company has no problem with allocating those (300 per AZ) on a monthly basis, using them for a couple days and returning them.
With that said, despite being a poor product I rely on Hangouts daily because I can make free WiFi calls with Voice. I can't afford cell service and it lets me stay connected to my family.
Google is a goddamn ad company, I expect that kind of bullshit from them.

Does that Apple ad come up more than once? If it does, yeah that's pretty annoying and disappointing too.
The Republican Waterloo
> higher battery usage isn't a problem for most if it excels in the areas that matter

As engineers it's our responsibility to not spend our users' resources unnecessarily. This thinking is how we got to the bloated web where pages need a megabyte (or several) of code just to render. Could you imagine an architect saying, "yeah, this design costs 2x that other one, but my clients are rich so it doesn't really matter"? The old saw that "anyone can build a bridge that stands up; it takes an engineer to build a bridge that barely stands up" applies.
I believe you made a fair portrait of the current situation.
It won't be long before these features are written into an extension. Then the 6% of users who use them can install that extension.
The board game industry, being a niche market, has long used pledge programs in which consumers commit to buy a game before it is manufactured. Kickstarter has taken over a lot of this, so some fraction of the Kickstarter games were made by established game publishers rather than individuals or new enterpreneurs.
This is a pretty big deal; Symantec controls many root CAs that are pretty old and widely distributed. If you're supporting embedded devices (or phones) with pretty old root stores, you don't have that many choices, and it can be hard to know what they really are, because documentation of root stores is fairly sparse.

Of course, there's not a good way for clients to indicate which root CAs they accept, and so they don't. If you get into the situation where newer devices don't support Symantec certs, and older devices don't support non-Symantec certs, it's time to figure out how to guess if you're talking to a newer or an older device and give appropriate certs. :(
Why would you assume that? Is it more than just you like Obama, and don't like Trump?
Really, there should be a default (probably public, but perhaps just the lowest-cost bronze plan you could buy off the exchange) option, for which you pay the premium, rather than a penalty.

If you want coverage to be mandatory, make it really mandatory.
When did Hangouts lose sms? I still send sms messages from it daily.
everyone get and will get IM wrong.

communication is taboo for ads. and nothing on the Internet can have a fee. see the incompatibility?

Facebook is spending on IM because it bought the first IM that dissociated itself from the Internet. every whatsapp user see it as a sms and phone company alternative.

everyone else that live by ads (Google, yahoo, etc) will try their hand at IM, realize they can't use it for ads or ad targeting, and will scratch it.
"and then let N=14" is how I've heard it.
Storm, Samza, Spark, and Flink Comparison
0.50% (50 bps) is excessive.

If you don't want to do yourself but still want the benefits of rebalancing (and tax-loss harvesting), suggest checking out Wealthfront (https://www.wealthfront.com/) instead.
I understand, but what is the benefit of appearing to support the bill if he knew it would fail?
I wonder why EA, Blizzard or the likes hasn't set up a site where you can vote on idea's for games like Lego Ideas has done for making lego sets. That's basically what's happening here except people are putting their money where their mouth is. It's like crowd sourcing idea, and they could probably make more desirable games. That said the companies would charge a premium and know they would get it.
Who gives a shit? It is almost always Americans making such statements, obsessed as they are about being number one. If Chine gets richer and more technologically advance that would be good for them and good for us westerners. It is not a zero sum game.

Although to be realistic I don't think China will ever outcompete the US. Not because I don't want them to, but simply because so many fundamentals count in Americas favor and against China. China is facing a demographic catastrophe. The US can easily grow its population with immigration and has plenty of land and natural resources to do so.
A Woman’s Job Interview Was Cancelled Because She Asked a Simple Question
>I see the illustration, but I don't understand how that's a "proof."

That's an illustration of the proof. Here is a more modern, animated example: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/29/Pythagor... The Chinese proof looks more like this one though: https://i.stack.imgur.com/Ylzhg.gif There is also explanation in the annotations.
You are welcome to our online hacking services.We encourage you to try this life transforming deal and be rich forever without any trace. OUR SERVICES We are professional carding team with a large ring around the globe.With over 2 million ATM infected with our malware and skimmers,we can grab card data which include track 1 and track 2 with the card pin.We in turn clone this cards using the grabbed data into real ATM cards which can be used to withdraw at the ATM or swiped at stores and POS.We sell these cards to all our customers and interested buyers worlwide,the card has a daily withdrawal limit of $25,000 on ATM and $10,000 spending limit in stores.Contact us now at (excelatmhackers@outlook.com)
From what I understand, the Chinese had often recorded many facts about nature and mathematics very early and accurately. However they never really created much laws. Laws of nature was a western invention. E.g. they observed accurately planetary movements, but never attempted to formulate the laws governing those movements. That sort of thinking was crucial for scientific thinking.
What else needs the menu space, since competition for menu space seems to be the sole justification?
I'll upvote any thread that mentions Forth. I have nothing but good memories of rolling my own RTOS.
I use Tab Wrangler https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/tab-wrangler/egnjh...
So sad! Don't want to install 2 more plugins. (Chrome doesn't allow more than one top-level menu item in a plugin)
It lists 21 distinct agencies:

* Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI)

* Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

* National Security Agency (NSA)

* Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence (OICI)

* Border and Customs Service Intelligence Unit [Homeland]

* US Coast Guard Intelligence [Homeland]

* Office of Homeland investigations [Homeland]

* Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) [State]

* Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence
[Treasury]

* Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) [Defense]

* National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA)

* National Reconnaissance Office (NRO)

* US Cyber Command

* US Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance and
Reconnaissance Agency (ISR)

* National Air and Space Reconnaissance Center (NASIC)

* US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM)

* National Ground Intelligence Center (NGIC) [Army]

* US Marine Core Intelligence Activity (MCIA)

* US Navy Department's Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI)

* FBI National Security Branch [Justice]

* Office of National Security Intelligence of Drug
Enforcement Administration (ONSI DEA) [Justice]

Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook, Revised Edition (2016)
by Edward N. Luttwak. Pages 60-62

http://amzn.to/2nlZrDC

The first edition (1968) is timeless, but the revised edition (2016) is amazingly on-point and is updated to reflect the structural changes which have occurred in the half century since it's first printing. It's only 300-odd pages, highly recommended.
Here's a blog post from Rob Pike about the design philosophies inherent in Go, and how that affected adoption from C/C++ developers vs. Python, Ruby, etc.

https://commandcenter.blogspot.com/2012/06/less-is-exponenti...
Well I'm not sure if many do. Most websites that have modals load fine without JS.
What is the difference, apart from the notation?
Distributed systems are not like traditional programs, because there is not just one "edge of the system".

Every node becomes an "edge" in it's own right, and doesn't necessarily have global coherence with the rest of the system.
I am a lawyer and yes it is
Absurd it is, but they are legally binding and have been used to screw consumers since 2011. Thanks Scalia!
Why don't you properly configure DKIM and SPF? Then you won't have this problem.
> group policy settings and the like which never seemed to completely disable the 'required' security updates.

I'm on Pro, use group policy and it has in months never installed an update without my explicit approval.
> The economics of asteroid mining only make sense if you're:

You're using linear projections. Elon Musk's entire goal with SpaceX is the Interplanetary Transit System. I also think that it will be a boon to multinational corporations who want to perform research/experiments that are either not possible, heavily regulated, or outright banned on earth.

> 1. Using the mined materials for space construction. But why are you doing space construction in the first place? So you can do more asteroid mining? So you can do more space construction?

Yes, exactly. Space exploration is a bit limited without construction in space. There's also the likely scenario that as the world becomes wealther, our consumption of technology will also grow. Look at the bet on AI and the huge capital investment necessary to run ML/DL projects. A combination of increased demand and an increase in global wealth which raises people's standards of living is also going to increase the cos of mining as people's environmental awareness is raised.

SpaceX has a plan for the colonization of Mars, so yes, to do more space construction.
I've complained about this sort of thing too (usually more privately). The upside is supposed to be precision and concision, but as you point out in this case they spent all their concision on buying precision. For this precision I think code should be considered more often instead of the usual informal math notation, which sometimes gets sloppy and harder to follow from outside the author's research community. (Edit: I'm not accusing that passage of sloppiness, but it's a problem that's frustrated me before with math in place of code.)
Sure. That'd be relevant if I ever made that claim. In fact, I said the opposite: "You will not be fine." (re: white and black felons).
Are journalists just going to do this with every agency in the IC now? FEW KNOW THAT THE TREASURY DEPARTMENT TRACKS MONEY LAUNDERING, COULD TRUMP COME AFTER YOUR WELLS FARGO ACCOUNT?
No they don't. Failure to read the entire agreement is not a defense. It's binding if you did some affirmative act (including using the product) after notice of the terms, even if it's only a link. Reasonable expectations mean nothing in this context. Will likely be sent to arbitration on an individual basis.
MiamiJS – Kyle Simpson Getify Bootcamp on JavaScript ES6 and Functional Prgming
FireMonkey is pretty good these days:

https://www.embarcadero.com/products/rad-studio

http://docwiki.embarcadero.com/RADStudio/Tokyo/en/FireMonkey
Life might not be, but most things people actually want, are.

My life experience pushes me toward the opposite conclusion: the closer I get to understanding what I actually want, the less of a zero-sum game life appears to be. The things which truly make me happy are squishy and intangible, things that people can make more of by simply choosing to participate in them. A sense of community, opportunities to contribute, being welcomed and included, creative interaction and mutual aid; these are the things that consistently make my life feel like it is going well.
See Concepcion v. AT&T Mobility LLC (April 2011) where the US Supreme Court ruled exactly that: class action is incompatible with arbitration so head over to arbitration as a lone individual.
Chrome is becoming the browser of the masses. Power user usability features are disappearing. I'm still upset over the removal of the backspace key as "back" navigation.

I shouldn't need an extension for this.
What I find a better alternative to Electron is to use the browser control of JavaFX (WebKit). You can program your UI in HTML/CSS/JS, and interact very easily with business logic written in Java, Scala, Clojure, Kotlin, Groovy, Ceylon, etc. (also JS, if you want). JavaFX comes included with the standard JVM. I imagine this approach will get even better with Java 9, especially the size of distributables.
Is that also going to disappear from atom and other electron apps ? Or is this feature re-implemented in electron itself ?
> Another example of magic in go would be method names. You have no idea if it is safe to change the name of a method because it could be satisfying an interface far away from the definition site (or in the case of exported methods nowhere you have access to).

Is this true? If you changed the name of a method, it will no longer satisfy that interface and your code would not compile.
> We do use systems that exhibit it under certain constraints, as per my example.

This is an error on your part. Your example does not violate non-dictatorship; the rules of the election permit anyone to vote against their party registration.

Arrow's theorem is about the design of elections, not predictions about how people will vote in practice.