skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Passphrases That You Can Memorize – But That Even the NSA Can’t Guess
Except they all face the same tax burden which, as a California resident until recently, is quite high: sales tax, property tax, income tax...they tax everything there, and there are few exemptions. Even at $60K the taxes in CA will eat you alive. Great weather (in SoCal), but the sunshine tax, it seemed to us, was perhaps as much as 50%!
Get Ready for the 2017 Underhanded Crypto Contest
For unlabeled foods one can imagine "smart" bins capable of weighing their contents and communicating that measurement via bluetooth to the "smart" refrigerator.
> I just found myself in situations where either there was no mouse, or it was more convenient to use the keyboard.

So it's better to just unplug the mouse then? :)
Or ECMAScript 7 or 8 or 9...
The direct negative effect on the quality of life of high housing costs is astonishing. Yet there's no real public uproar. When the price of gas goes up, seemingly everyone is up in arms. But housing?! People complain, but no where near as much as they should. In areas with high housing costs, this should be the primary political issue. I guess nepotism just wins the argument...
Secure Salted Password Hashing – How to Do It Properly
mgmt looks very interesting, I enjoyed reading many of these posts about the design and philosophy. What is LMK?
I love digitaltrends.com. Good writing and a lot of interesting pieces on new technology.
Airbus Has Revealed Its Flying Car-Drone Hybrid
It's a complex issue.

NAFTA fucked rural Mexico as a tidal wave of cheap corn flooded the economy and killed the smaller scale agriculture, just as it did in the US. You also have periods where economic crisis and monetary devaluation in Mexico wipes out a lot of middle class type people. A lot of laborers and construction guys came because of this.

You also have an insurgency in many parts of Mexico where the cartels have taken over and often little functional government exists. People there bug out if they can.

Many of the "peasant" immigrants are from Central America and pass through Mexico.

As far as economic impact, it's a complicated issue there too. The big land interests in Western States generally control the senate delegations pretty tightly. A lot of people are making a lot of money off of illegals, so if there were some major change, you'd see some sort of guest worker visa or change to labor laws (especially minimum wage, workers compensation and overtime) to keep the farms picked and slaughterhouses running.
Perform multiple SSH hops with SSH config and a jump host
Except that no amount of scrubbing should make you undetectable.
Why You Need Cloud Garbage Collection in 2017?
I just wanted to add some positive comments here complaining the state of the web as we know it today vs. the people who are working on the solutions to the problems. There are well defined paradigms for building distributed systems. While much of the web was built in the belief these distributed systems would take root, lots of engineering went into client-server configurations. There are a ton of psychological reasons why these decisions were made. They don't have to keep being made though. We can all embrace distributed applications (some call them serverless applications) and free the web once again. Here's a lot of great projects that are trying to do just that: http://github.com/toadkicker/awesome-ethereum
I second this approach. The only state my behavior classes hold are injected dependencies.

The only caveat to this approach is that for some cases you will need a state accumulator of some sort. But those state manipulations are isolated and easy to deal with.
What Triggers Diabetic ketoacidosis?
You can transform:

o.f(a,b,c)

to

f(o,a,b,c)

Remove methods and use the object as a data structure.
> The intention is, that when someone calls them self an engineer, you can have confidence in both their technical ability and moral obligations.

I thought the intention was that, even if someone didn't have confidence in both their technical ability and moral obligations, it didn't matter. An engineer is a person whose technical decisions are literally protected by law - if they decide to not sign off on something, they don't have to convince anyone and can't face consequences for it (ahem, Quebec bridge[1]). What you're suggesting is just a byproduct of confidence in the system.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quebec_Bridge - Search for 'iron ring'
It's a very idealistic goal. But sure, with a free and open Internet (which I'd call anarchic rather than democratic) there's no way to police content. For one thing, there's no overall authority. And even if there were, policing content would be impossibly contentious and prone to injustice.

In my opinion, what's needed are privacy and freedom. And education for independent thought, rather than censorship.
Probably almost all of them, if we're including emotional pain.
Not any more...

Meet the new boss: same as the old boss, but now you have to learn to deal with them all over again. :-(
There, perhaps, is the right to leave and to refuse to obey, but there is no right to be accepted in any country you wish and no right to demand anything once you left your country. There is definitely no Right to become a burden to others.
One of the common nice features in OOP is polymorphism. You have a list/set/collection of objects which are of the same type, but also of different subtypes. They have the same behavior when calling some method and different behaviors when calling another method.

OOP is not a failure. But overengineering is another thing. (Sometimes I heard "Never write static function/method! Do it in OOP way!", though it doesn't make the code simpler or cleaner)
Well a lot of people own houses and are happy about it. There is plenty of uproar about it from renters. Mountain View just passed a rent control measure for example.
For all the things the Airpods do right, they're still easy to miss, in-ear headphones with sub par audio quality.

> Apps SHOULD have a context-sensitive input device

Like the mouse. And the screen. Not a separate screen I have to look down to be able to use because it has no proper tactile feedback unlike a proper key.

> A minor but VERY nice design and attention to detail.

An extremely minor thing that's not worth all the downsides. I can get a better version of that gimmick on my mouse just using the side button+scroll wheel.

> For example, when I'm editing a contact's phone number, the buttons for labels like "Home" or "Work" appear on the Touch Bar.

You don't need a separate screen to have context sensitive buttons. This sounds like an UX compromise just to push the touch bar rather than something I'd want.

Also "in a scrolling list on the Touch Bar." That cannot be faster than a mouse or keyboard shortcut, and would be trivial to replicate with the keyboards F-keys (two keys for scrolling forward/backward, rest for selection). Another example on how it's just a gimmick.

> The new MacBook Pros. Modern computers SHOULD have a single type of port, and we should be able to use any port for charging.

I value more being able to connect all my devices without 5 different dongles hanging from my laptop than idolizing an ideal, non-existent world.

> Unlocking my MacBook by just raising the lid if I'm wearing my Apple Watch.

You can do this with any other programmable smartwatch. I remember people were doing this with a Pebble. It's still a gimmick.

> Touch ID on Macs. Can't wait for third-party apps to use it for authentication like on iOS.

You're praising fingerprint readers under a marketing name. I literally have this on a cheap refurbished HP laptop from 2010 or so I've been using as a server.

> Being able to seamlessly copy/paste across your Apple devices is one of those things you never knew you needed, but you'll sorely miss when you work on devices that don't have it.

So... KDE Connect?

So indeed, Apple seems to be doing nothing but gimmicks and more proprietary lock-in. This is a good thing, somehow?
There is an uproar, but there's an equal and greater uproar in the opposite direction whenever there's a new housing attempted to be built. Existing homeowners and establishment rally against it and they're quite organized.

Couple this with the fact that California is entrenched in bureaucratic red tape, and you can see why nothing ever gets done about it.
Business using IE and Safari are still running them fine, and they're still supported in the latest Firefox ESR (though it will reportedly be the last). However, with the recent changes in Firefox, no "evergreen" browser now supports them.
No. A nation may place whatever restriction they like on foreigners entering. This has been a right of nations since the beginning of recorded history.
It's a split issue. Renters want prices to go down. Owners want prices to go up.

Who wins the political clash? Are there more voting owners, or voting renters?

Generally there are more owners, though California has one of the lowest home ownership rates at around 53%. Cities draw this average down -- most suburbs have higher ownership rates.

With this in mind it shouldn't be a surprise that owners outvote renters.
Doesn't unrestricted immigration also eliminate the choice of some (those whose government enacts different policies with the new voters)?

I don't think "choice" is how you decide these arguments. Either your choice to make noise limits my choice to sleep or vice versa. There is not always a way to limit the choice of none.
Only when one believes in "God given rights" or similar, that exist independently of man-made laws and customs.

Otherwise, what's a right is what people define as one.

Here's a related question: is the will of a collection of people A (e.g. "no immigration to our parts") more or less important than the will of other people to immigrate there?

And two PS notes, as most people will focus on the wrong aspects of the question.

P.S 1: To bypass any kind of hypocrisy charges etc, e.g. "how you A people think you ended where you are now?", we can make A's proclamation as "no further immigration to our parts" -- this is selfish maybe, but not hypocritical.

P.S 2: Since few/no groups A have a uniform will, we can define A's will as the usual majority/plurality will, especially as expressed through their typical form of elections.
Kaldi http://kaldi-asr.org/

OpenCV
The State is illegitimate. It is up to the rightful landowners to allow whoever they want on their premises.
i get that, I just wonder whether utilising a massive platform approach like reCAPTCHA could optimise the ability of NLP to comprehend things at a far higher rate.
> Underneath all of this lies the fallacy of thinking that you can predict the future needs of your code

The point of OOP isn't to predict the future. You should be actively aware that you cannot know the future and leave youself room for change.
>and what you end up with is subjugation in a pretty package.
Is this trolling? I really can't comprehend any point you have here. That people from outside a nation have the right to immigrate to a nation or else the nation is at risk of... what, exactly?
Thanks for those references. Threads of truth in language.
interest rates on savings accounts [...] in the UK [are] competitive with government bonds.

Looking at the rates for UK government bonds, it looks like those are also below inflation (e.g 5 year yields are around 0.6%). If there were any savings accounts paying above inflation, I think exchange rates would be shifting accordingly in the absence of capital controls. I suspect that savings accounts representing a poor RoI is therefore a global phenomenon.

The only thing which I can think of that the parent could be referring to is the money market. I think I'm as lost as you as to what he is getting at.
Have you considered not psychopathy, which is not a clinical term but a criminology term, but something like a dissociative disorder or schizoid disorder?

Yes, when I have spoken with therapists they typically use one of two terms: Antisocial Personality Disorder or Narcissistic Personality Disorder. However it's pretty clear to me that neither of those fit because they seem to present without the manipulative behavior.

You are correct though that the term psychopath isn't medical but rather criminal focused.

It was my understanding that schizoid was more along the line of schizophrenia and schizotypal was along the lines of borderline but I am not as familiar with those. I'll look into that, thanks.
I thought he was saying exactly the opposite:

"We must push back against misinformation by encouraging gatekeepers such as Google and Facebook to continue their efforts to combat the problem, while avoiding the creation of any central bodies to decide what is “true” or not."
All you need to know about Google’s SHA1 Collision Attack
Maybe? I wouldn't touch mercury for any reason, though.
Disengagements requiring immediate manual control are also in the disengagement report. https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/wcm/connect/946b3502-c959-4e3b...

One every 14000 miles in 2016, an improvement from one every 1500 miles in 2015. Waymo has already indicated that it wants to run a mobility service by the end of the year. This regulation is right on time.
Utopian fantasies aside, borders are what maintain our standard of living.
New research changes our understanding of who built ancient Silk Roads
How do you cope with the fact that a large slice of the population seeks out bad things and refuses good things?

The obvious examples are US news sources such as Fox News, Breitbart and Infowars [1]. However, it could also apply to fast food eating habits.

[1] http://uk.businessinsider.com/conservative-media-trump-drudg...
Two Main Attributes to a True Frienship
Paypal Horror Story 40k Frozen No Answers
Yes, in a perfect world...

However, if you're reverse engineering a system you've inherited, or one where source code isn't readily available, then this decompilation makes sense.
The right to determine immigration policy is a sovereign power, in the US it is granted by law to the executive branch (subject of course to many other natural and national laws.)
This is exactly what we did initially. Really early on (before any rate limiting was in place), a few spam accounts followed 100K people, created lots spam content etc. Encapsulating those deletions started yielding messages bigger than the default max kafka message size (1MB). Additionally, this method had a few side effects on the downstream processors. We could of course increase the limit, but we decided to deal with the problem at its core.
So, this may simply be because this differs between countries - I live in the US. Here, you do not study psychiatry in med school, it's something you study after you complete regular medical school. The rough path looks like:

- 4 years of undergrad, ideally with one major in Biology

- MCAT

- 4 years of general medical school

- 4 years of specialized psychiatry residency, usually at university hospital

Meaning, here in the US it's a medical discipline, but this may not be the case where you live.

You're absolutely right that there is a horrific history to the field of psychiatry - homosexuality indeed wasn't unlisted until a little over 40 years ago. However, this is rapidly changing with the advent of tools like PCR and Western Blotting, which allows psychiatry to research mental disease on the level of individual gene expression and proteins.
I only said he had praise for Castro, a dictator whose soldiers shot people trying to escape his rule in thd back and drowned their boats. I didn't say he was against democracy, only that he said very nice things about a dictatorship that he sure isn't dumb enough to live under.
Take three principles:

The Principle of Sufficient Reason:

Every fact can be explained in terms of some other facts.
Call those other facts the sufficient reasons for said fact.

The Principle of Non-Cyclic Reasoning:

No fact is ever explained in terms of itself. That is,
if you repeatedly take the "sufficient reasons" for a fact,
you never get back to the original fact.

The Principle of No Infinite Regress:

There is no infinite chain of (distinct) sufficient reasons.
That is, there is no infinite sequence F1, F2, F3, ... such
that "F2 is one of the sufficient reasons for F1", "F3 is one
of the sufficient reasons for F2", etc.

You can't have all three: every directed graph whose nodes are facts and whose edges are "is one of the sufficient reasons for" either has (i) a dead-end, or (ii) a cycle, or (iii) an infinite chain.

For those who believe the PSR: which do you give up? Are you ok with cycles, or with infinite regress?
The right of ownership is granted by the state. If there is no state you own nothing
Why isn't there an HTML linter in the same way there is ESLint for JavaScript?
The author of the article also makes a critical mistake in the just-so example you cite, writing

>And I will lay you ten to one that after you have answered
>the questions, and explained how to find the information,
>and why you want it, the clerk will go off and get one of
>the other clerks to help him find Garcia - and then come
> ^^^^^^
>back and tell you there is no such man. Of course I may lose
>my bet, but according to the Law of Average, I will not.

The historical figure the clerks were told to look for with imprecise identifiers and no business context is "Corregio", not "Garcia".

The author supplanted the subject of research with the mythical "Garcia" but even that metaphorical substitution is problematic because if Corregio:Garcia::research:letter then really all the clerks need do is return to the requester and say "I found Corregio".

It rhetorically opens the question of whether Rowan found Garcia or merely found "a" Garcia.

EDIT: subject verb agreement in first sentence. Add qualifying phrase in second sentence.
ITT: people being snide about scripting languages over a post digging into a glibc malloc mishap
I guess you do not follow the answers posted there.
Some of them can, I remember articles of people solving problem with hard numbers and theories (bandwidth, maximum stack space, ) bridging mentally high level applicative layer and the low level one. I never saw this kind of methodology in my computer classes.
Often times we don't know the schedule is wrong until its too late to help. For a two year project that's probably not the case. But getting you data in two days may mean I realize the data won't be done the day of.
Actually no. Saying the internet needs to make money is just as wrong as saying the roads need to make money. The net is just an infrastructure that has to be maintained and paiyd for. "Making money" is absolutely not a neccessety.
Your comment reminds me of the class responsibility discussions we used to have. Should we have gasStation->fillUp(vehicle) or vehicle->fillUp(gasStation)? There is no right answer and depends on the situation.
For that to be true, the landowners must depose the government, and give up the protections and benefits afforded them. There is an exchange of natural rights for the protections and benefits of belonging to a nation.
Don't know that you'll want to hear this, but every time I've run into returning view data from the server, I've had problems (something something separation of concerns). Unless you have both a data endpoint directly and a separate view endpoint, or a data endpoint that you can dictate to return the view, I would not recommend this approach. You're blocking yourself into a corner doing it this way.
If that were to become a problem, we only need to get Charles Darwin's cookbook.
Spend some time in rural Missouri or podunk rust belt USA. Or inner city Atlanta.

I don't doubt much of Russia is an awful place. I've never been there and have zero desire to go. But from what I conceive, I just don't see the unpleasantness collapsing the system any faster than it is going to in the west.

I appreciate your experience and thoughts. I just find middle kingdom VS unwashed barbarians who don't know enough to offer sacrifices to the right gods so how can they be smart enough to beat us? type thinking a bit dangerous.

It's like a meeting with Microsoft executives laughing about a start up calling them potheads and basement dwellers, saying there are only 6 of them, and besides, we have a well funded task force working on that exact project who should have a preliminary report out in 9-12 months so no need for concern.

Russian military/intelligence capabilities are obviously fairly formidable. I believe we should recognize this regardless of how much their citizens drink.
This is coming up as part of the reopening of the healthcare plan debate in the US. The nice framing of flat healthcare insurance pricing is that it "doesn't discriminate against the elderly." But an equally valid framing is that "younger people subsidize older people."

But this question is really at the heart of insurance mandates however imposed. In the absence of such, young healthy people don't want to pay for insurance because they don't really take into account unlikely events and they look at the health care they're likely to need for routine accidents, etc. and the insurance looks far more costly than their expected benefit (and it is).
The implication seems to be that female independence gained at the price of "hyper sexual objectification" is not as noble as that gained through e.g. hard work and responsibility?
The United States has plenty of moral responsibility to accept immigrants from countries in Central America after spending billions screwing them up with dirty secret wars in the 70s and 80s.
I believe that this is generally true, and provable.

One of the hardest things to learn, for example, is a foreign language. If the language is drastically different from one's mother tongue, then it generally takes adults about 10 years of casual study, or three years of intense study. I think this qualifies learning a second language as an outstanding achievement. Many adults try and give up, and the vast majority never progress past fluency to native-level (partly for lack of trying). By many objective measures too, it's a difficult task; I have probably stored many dozens of thousands of unique pieces of information in my brain related to my chosen language of study. Languages are complex in ways we don't even know we understand; Clifford is a big red dog, not a red big dog.

And yet, for the most part, every single person ever born learns language. Even people born with severe cognitive disabilities generally succeed at learning language.

So while I accept there is a strong correlation between genetics and measures such as IQ, I really do find it hard to believe that there is anyone who is truly incapable of learning basic calculus, or Python, or how to play the guitar. In practice, it doesn't seem this way, but every time I think about this issue I can't help but consider that out of a sample size of 1 billion people randomly born in China, pretty much 1 billion of them successfully learned Chinese.
To be devil's advocate... Why not just make the data free and open to all? It is for the benefit for humanity. You and I are in this world together and we should help each other as much as possible.
Bogleheads forum.
> Why are there still those who think any advocate of OOP is an advocate of "OOP or Nothing! All things are Objects!

Well, that's what the OP in OOP means. It means you are oriented towards objects, and away from everything else.

What's the difference between writing a test and doing TDD? In TDD the tests are the center of your universe.

Plus there's the fact that "Everything is an Object" was a very common slogan for OOP.

Of course you can write non-objects in your object oriented code... An object is made of non-objects! But OOP means when you are asking architecture questions you sort out your names and your methods first, and functions fill in the gaps.

Compare to (old school) JavaScript where everything is a function to start, and you add prototypes and methods only when you really need them. (RIP JavaScript, long live OOP/ES6)
IS IT a SCAM? TAI LOPEZ: Social Media Marketing Agency Review – FIND OUT NOW