skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> One of them sold aircraft parts to Iran, which may have had some legal restrictions that applied.

Shady is an understatement.

In the EU countries I do business with, that falls under sensitive hardware being send to a sensitive country.

Not only do you need to get extensive approval from the national-export-agency-thing, but it's also special goods that's likely to be used for military purpose, thus you are required to contact the feds on your own initiative to disclose the full details of the order and the clients and get yet another level of approval and background checks.

By "just sending the goods" you are in a very serious breach of regulations. Don't be surprised when your shipment is stopped at the border and the payments are frozen, because that's 100% guaranteed to happen if you get a control.

Even if you try to get away with it. The intermediate providers like the shipping company and the payment provider still have to follow the law and they take it seriously.
Which version of react-router are you using? V4 is very straightforward I thought.
How does 1000W compare to the rest of the car? Also, I can't find any concrete numbers from NVIDIA, but the great discussion on https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12938016 pointed at an Anandtech article suggesting the full Drive PX2 is 250W (and suggested that a Model S chews up about 3600W).
Should have mentioned: data is based on the 'Who is hiring' thread of the previous month. In the future I'm planning to add more data for previous months/years as well and maybe get jobs from other sources too.
Funny how this subject has progressed. I recall writing perl code and being pretty happy with the results until I heard that "functional" programming was crap. Soon after Perl added a "OOPs" layer that coders either rejoiced over or complained about and I couldn't help but think "Do I really need to write code this way?"

After a couple decades of coding I've come to the conclusion that "easy" is almost always better. There isn't much code I wrote 20 years ago that anyone is using today but where it is in use it runs without needing to be updated or maintained.

Most of my apps are now mostly written in Javascript, and I write them very much the same as I did in Perl. I use a mix of both "functional" and "object oriented" methods and don't worry about what others think of it.

Of course, I'm not doing "AI" or anything close to that. I make apps for business management and they care a whole lot more about the UI, reliability, and security, than what the code looks like. The only thing I ever get when showing them code is a glassy eyed look of despair and worry that I won't stop.
For every Microsoft, you have 50 pretty much any advertising network, random consulting firm or other company that doesn't give a shit.
Or it's not so awesome
Ah, nice catch. In that case I generally agree with him.
If you think that the US banks are/were more regulated than Canadian banks you would be incorrect.
Would you say those two last tools are the best option as of today as far as using open source to conveniently store zero knowledge bits on S3? Haven't looked into the space much before but I'd gladly get rid of spideroak if I could self host it.
All of those disengagements, which have erred on the side of caution, have been reported, so why does it throw doubt on the statistics? The rate of disengagements has gone down so much that Waymo has announced a mobility service by the end of the year, which seems aggressive to me, but within two years seems perfectly reasonable. After all, they can limit service to the environments that they know they'll ​have no problems with.
I was surprised to read their mobile solution delegates the decryption to a software running on their server: https://spideroak.com/manual/spideroak-on-mobile

This is clearly not "no Knowledge"....

Looking forward to standing corrected if I am wrong.
Is there a right for a person to move into my house?

Conversely, is there a right for me to invite people to move into my house? Is it even "my" house in the first place?
My question: do I have a right to immigrate to your house?
I know for sure that btrfs scrub found 8 correctable errors on my home server filesystem last July. This is obviously great news for me. Contrary to a lot of people here I've personally found btrfs to be really stable (as long as you don't use raid5/6 though).
Whenever a non-technical salesman (or CS rep) tells me "we can't access your data", I usually smile and take it to mean "I personally don't have access to a GUI for sifting through your data". Not that such an interface it likely to exist at all, but that I don't trust them to know anything more detailed than that.
>Development is hard.

It really is. That's what Lothrop Stoddard called 'The Burden Of Civilization'. Essentially, this is to say that, in as much as civilization can be a good thing, it is also very difficult to attain and sustain; some people are willing to push themselves as hard as they can to do this and some people just aren't equipped to handle civilization.
A similar story with that title was posted a while ago.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10716102

And the industrytap link has been posted to HN a few times: https://hn.algolia.com/?query=industrytap.com%20ships&sort=b...
CLI: Command-Line Interface, TUI: Text User Interface. I'd think that CLI is a subset of TUI.
Google Easter has a nice little easter egg when you search for for "conway’s game of life".
What worked for me with Comcast was ultimately filing an FCC complaint, at which point someone from their executive customer relations team was assigned to me and was actually very responsive. It's just a shame I had to file an official complaint before getting decent support.
While I am not familiar with any offers in the 7-to-9-inch range, in the 11 inch bucket there are a couple offers such as this Acer:

https://www.acer.com/ac/en/US/content/series/aspireonecloudb...

HP, Lenovo and Dell have similar offerings for around US$200. I have a slightly older Acer that, while not as small as my AOA150, which my wife used to call my "makeup case", is still small and cheap (I got it from B&H for about US$160).
> It’s January 2018 and after enjoying a meal with her family

I did not realize that either until I read the comments. That is some over-dramatic click-baity bullshit.
What fuel-type does the Space-X drone ship use? (just curious)
If you click on the link that says "x minutes ago" you'll get a reply option. Or it might have to do with your account being new.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13831996

Plus several related stories:

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Hangouts&sort=byDate&dateRange...
I think your claim is true for a single moment in time, but if you look at the Principle of Sufficient Reason as only talking about the potential for facts to be explained in terms of other facts ("Every fact can be explained in terms of some other facts")—then I think dead ends at single points in time are fine.
Agreed, and that's how zfs does it behind the scenes. When it detects a read error, it uses the pool redundancy (whether mirrors or RAIDZn, whichever you're using) to transparently recover from the error. Even if you set up a pool with only one disk you can still set it to keep multiple copies of all the data.

A super-ZFS that automatically did that using remote mirrors would be interesting, but would also stretch the definition of "transparent" a bit.
You could use a business bank account with an associated debit card. Continue accepting PayPal but only use it as a processor and transfer funds to your business account regularly. This also makes it easier to have multiple payment methods, like if you want to test Stripe. It's a little bit more work but it's probably worth it. Oh, and most banks let you download some sort of spreadsheet for accounting.
Oh, well it's ported from Solaris to illumos and FreeBSD and to a lesser extent OS X and Linux. So I'm still confused about the portability claim.
I've been to Cuba twice. I disagree.

How many times have you been there?
That's misleading. You don't write tests to check types. You write the same tests you would with a typed language. There is no extra work.

A by product of testing your logic is that it will fail if there is a type cast problem.
Thanks very much. Keep your findings coming, I'll be happy for any feedback.
I don't think it's impossible, I just think it's not worth the effort. Other languages won't add any functionality that javascript doesn't already provide, or that isn't already served by languages compiling to javascript. It only adds unnecessary complexity to an already messy ecosystem.
“As We May Think” – Vannevar Bush and the Memex
So, why did they use it?

I do not know why, but good marketing and technical accuracy can easily clash. Even just trying to communicate generally can be tripped up by different uses of the same term. You tend to find that out by stepping in it, not by somehow knowing ahead of time that X term will be drama for some reason.
See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/As_We_May_Think

If you want to see previous discussions of this material, a good link is this one:

https://hn.algolia.com/?query=Vannevar%20Bush&sort=byDate&da...
Opportunities for machine-learning startups: An investor perspective
Ok. That kinda makes sense.

Does it flow through to subsidiaries or EU citizen owned foreign enterprises? Because it seems like this could lead to a regulatory race to the bottom.
> People can negotiate reasonable notice periods, and parental leave, severance pay etc, if they rather want that than more money every month. (But that negotiation / demand only works if the economy is humming along fine. So that is way more important.)

Vulnerable workers aren't in a position to negotiate anything.
> I just spent a month in Cambridge, and while I met some great people working on important things, I have to say, there's definitely some ossification over there and it's a real problem.

What does "ossification" means in this context?
If you are interested at all in Scala, lihaoyi's blog (http://www.lihaoyi.com/) is phenominal.
I think it shows that their model had too few features, and was an excellent example of the streetlight effect of genetic testing. Because genetic results are so easy to obtain the signal is readily overweighted by people for decision making.

I would far rather have Ethan Hawke's character as a coast guard swimmer rescuing me in a storm than his brother, even if his brother had no similar heart defect. I would do that because I saw two instances in the movie of him out-performing his brother in feats of swimming endurance when under pressure.

His character is statistically more likely to die on the mission. Just to get a handle on the numbers let's say that with their filtering a 30 year old has about 1/20,000 chance of dying in a given month, and he might have a 1/1000 chance. We haven't seen anything about how he outperformed other candidates, but we can consider the respect of his peers and that he has succeeded in spite of appreciable time spent on establishing an identity and tracking down his DNA.

It probably doesn't matter if he dies on a routine mission. It is the rare mission with an anomaly where someone who is truly exceptional matters. If he is only 20 times more likely to provide the unusual solution that saves the mission, then it is a wash.

Anyway, my point is that one perspective on filling positions is to develop a long list of dis-qualifiers like health forecasts (and minimum competence). That is different than choosing the most extraordinary people possible (where negatives play a role in that determination). I know there is a tendency toward the former when choosing people for very selective and highly sought after roles, but it probably only appropriate when trying to fill out a large headcount with minimal resources for selecting the people. Those who can excel during crunch time are probably far more important for high level positions that are routine but punctuated requirements for extraordinary performance, than the people who look good to a hiring manager playing it safe and relying on clear but potentially less important signals.
What are you talking about? ES6 transpiles down to ES5, and this is what people publish libraries as. The language version compatibility story is way better than it is for most languages.
$20k seems really low for most full time jobs in the United States. The average (median) job in the US pays around $30k. And software development jobs are above average jobs, so those numbers that you posted seem off.
We are all conspiracy theorists
I wonder if the recent Linux syscall emulation on Windows would somehow make it possible or easier to port ZFS on Linux to Windows.

I know you have the SPL anyway, so maybe with the addition of the Linux POSIX-ish layer in there this could be the case...
And the graph of all potential facts? Which does that have: dead ends, cycles, or infinite chains?
The Vanity Fair article on Nick Sloane covers his career as a salvage master and touches on scuttling:

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2014/12/nick-sloane-costa-co...

Another scuttling but for a different reason:

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/201...
https://www.reddit.com/r/leanfire/ is another good subreddit for early retirees.
You lost a factor of a thousand in there somewhere. 6000l/h * 10kWh/l is 60MW. So 30GWh total. Also lithium ion batteries are nowhere near 500Wh/kg.

So we might need about 150 tons of battery to match the energy, and that's the entire capacity of the ship gone. But batteries are more efficient, so let's say 50 tons.

It's possible, I guess, but not practical. Maybe if lithium air batteries live up to their promise it could be done.
and I suspect that's revenue, not income
You can always use zvols and just use ext4+luks on that. There is also work on ZFS native encryption that looks pretty promising, not sure if it's ready yet.
Yup. Plaque psoriasis here. Started on my elbows when i was 18ish. Now it's pretty much everywhere, but hands and face are all that's visible in public.

The treatment ladder is pretty interesting. UVb is step one, i always felt a little silly about going in to the dermatologist for a tan. That had no noticable effect for me, but it does help some people.

The topical cremes are fairly effective for me, but it's tough to get pharmacies to give me enough. They show up with a little tube, and i have to explain that's like 3 days worth - covering the whole body 2x a day takes, like, a lot. I need nine more and i'll see you in a month buddy. And of course they thin the skin. I try not to overtreat, no creme if there's no redness. but i'm sure there are spots with consequences.

The generalized immune suppressants are pretty scary to me, 20 years of methotrexate seems untenable. I could see perhaps a short term 3 months ish run to get it under control, then touch up with the cremes.

I like the idea of the biologics. humera, stelara and enbril, are the big ones i think. narrowly targeting just the inflammation response part of my immune system seems a little less risky than the broad suppression of cancer drugs.

I dunno. it sucks. I try to use the lightest touch to get by in the hope that something better will come along, without doing too much damage right now.

Talk to your derm, of course, but for me just a really good moisturizing creme a few times a day will soften up those hard patches so they don't crack so easy. I try to keep up with the vanity treatments, hands and face, to banish the redness all the time. I tend to not worry about the rest until it gets pretty itchy - moisturizer helps keep the itching down quite a bit for me.

Anyway, i go through phases. I'm sure this summer i'll try to hit everything hard for two solid months. Maybe i can get back to a casual maintenance mode.

it sucks. you're not alone. I'm not exactly in your same boat, i'm just hoping it does not spread to my joints. At that point i think i'd have to go with a cancer drug or injectable. hopefully there will be better drugs, or the current drugs will be better understood, before that's an issue.

It sucks it can't be fixed. My least effort to make this tolerable probably isn't ideal, i'm probably over weighting the risk of side effects and under weighting the damage done to my skin by just letting things go. but you know, it's a thing. it's a thing i can't really do much about so i try not to let it dominate my life. There have been times when it really controlled my thoughts and fears. Those times suck, you'll get through them.
How about neither? You have the choice of Apple's closed proprietary system, or Google's not-really-open proprietary system.

Google actually has the power to mandate hardware standards. You can't just sell an Android phone. You have to join the Open Handset Alliance (OHA), at which point, you can never make Amazon Fire devices.

You can always release AOSP-based Android phones with no Google services, but good luck finding a market.

Google has no interest in making hardware standard, because if they did, we might see other operating systems actually be able to take over the mobile market, much like Linux and the late 90s/early 2000s in the PC era:

http://penguindreams.org/blog/android-fragmentation/

Microsoft required their devices to have standard UEFI, and are hence more hackable and easy to upgrade, but the bootloaders are locked and fewer people are using them today anyway.

Plasma from KDE only officially supports two phones. ARM isn't a platform, it's a spec that should go die in a fire.
Imho it's greatly valuable to have a "real scripting language" in you tool-belt. Node doesn't qualify like one to me, unless you're one those mutants with brains twisted in particular ways that actually like explicit-async code everywhere. Considering the age we live in, one with good interfaces to machine-learning stuff would be great, so Python is great to know well imho.

The kind of prototypes that I can hack together with Python + whatver frontend in a day can take 4x as much to do with Nodejs for me, simply because there are so many micro-decisions to make at every point (libA or micro-libC + micro-libB or mega-lib-D kind of stuff). And the way it leaves you with you "brains fried" after wrangling with some async bug... not worth it imho. Better to have the boring technical micro-decision made by someone else for you so you can concentrate on the cool stuff.

If you're working on anything where the product OR idea OR algorithm OR ux-process is much much much more important that "ecosystem" or scalability bulshit, nodejs will always feel at least 2x slower to develop in than either Python (if you're into AI/ML-ish things) or Ruby or Go or Elixir...

For web apps my alternative receipe would be to keep the web app nodejs and more the smarter-than-crud stuff to microservices written in anything but Nodejs.
I think the GP is making an appeal to how regulation should work.

Ideally, regulation should make it so bank stock holders eat the losses for poorly thought-out loans and should prevent all the various sleazy ways international shippers escape responsibility for their decisions.

What happens, though, is because regulators can't do that, they wind-up paying shippers and other polluters to change the bad decisions they already profited from (providing extra credit to upgrade ships, for example).

It is a shame but what can you do?
استانداردهای اتاق سرور را میتوانید در این مقاله بخوانید
These ships could be nuclear powered - like subs/other vessels are already. That ought to make a huge impact on carbon footprint.
How does a safe prevent you from debating valuation? It seems like a safe note with no discount is rarely a good deal unless you hit the valuation cap (why not just wait until A otherwise?), and if you do hit the cap it's essentially equivalent to investing in a round priced at the cap (a little worse due to preference caps).

In what way is the cap not a "valuation"?
From what I understand, these ships are huge and cover very large distances. This requires a lot of fuel. Bunker is the cheapest fuel for this use-case (it, -- sort of literally -- being a bottom of the barrel sort of thing).

Not sure what the global impact would be of banning bunker, or (trying to) refine it. Economic or environmental.
Oh that is good, right through pirate infested waters with no armed crew?
1) An article discussing the prices of drugs that doesn't talk about the costs of RnD and the FDA approval process is pointless.

2) We're in a free market, companies can charge a billion dollars a pill if they want to.
It's worth reading the Wikipedia page: "Timeline of Hypertext Technology"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_hypertext_technolo...
Unit tests are not really meant to test whether the code does what it's supposed to do initially, but more about making sure that it _keeps_ working when you're changing a bunch of stuff. For a pre-traction startup/MVP, the latter doesn't really matter. It will be the first version of the product, so there won't be a lot of changes. If the first version of the product gets traction, then it becomes interesting to write more tests.
At least one airport does this with planes, John Wayne Airport in Orange County, CA. In the 1980s, they implemented stricter controls over how much noise planes flying in & out can make. [1]

On related note, FedEx flew (flies?) Boeing 727s, a rather noisy plane by commercial jet standards. They knew that plane noise was increasingly become an undesirable trait, and managing noise levels needed to be made a priority. At some point, FedEx decided to that retrofitting 727s to produce less noise was a sound investment, so they​ built a hush kit. [2] It'd be interesting to learn whether the development of hush kits was a proactive and/or reactive decision.

I suspect that a large enough country like the USA could heavily incentivize for more efficient shipping. The USA could levy a tax on goods shipped via inefficient ships. All they'd have to do is have enough information about the supply chain to reasonably enforce the tax. Sure, dodging the tax could be gamed, but compliance is a different issue. While the USA couldn't tell Canadian ports what to do, they could tax goods which entered Canadian ports when those goods enter the USA.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Wayne_Airport#Aircraft_no...

[2] http://www.fedex.com/us/hushkit/history/index.html
> where only the relatively safer and lower-concentration forms of a drug are legal?

Partial legalisation of that type is likely to be counterproductive to achieving such a shift to safer forms of drugs. Trying to enforce (laudable and correct) principles such as "lower-concentrations are better and safer" with the coarse and brutal tool of the criminal law tends to be counterproductive -- there are far better tools of policy-making.

As far as the criminal law and the police goes, they should keep their nose out of drugs except for pathological cases where there's actual criminal intent -- such as intentional / grossly negligent fuckups by drug manufacturers or people non-consensually dosing others or, say, drugged driving. Besides those sorts of exceptions, it should be impossible to get arrested/searched for any drug offences.

Completely removing the selection pressures (those created by fear of law-enforcement actions such as search and arrest) towards easier-to-conceal drugs will, by itself, allow for exactly the shift back that you describe. Combining that with regulatory requirements for labelling, dose accuracy, and lack of impurities will allow people to safely use drugs in controlled accurate doses.
I haven't tried to do it with Ubuntu specifically, but I do know that ZFS-on-linux works fine atop LUKS full-disk encryption. My laptop is running NixOS with such a setup, and I'm pretty sure I followed the Ubuntu ZFS documentation while figuring out how to do it.

(summary: I don't know how to make it super easy, but what you want should totally work)