skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
There's definitely something to what you say. At the same time, it's a multi-faceted problem and the two party monopoly is one of them.
Right, and if you can't see how the assertion is true, then you don't understand basic economics -- specifically, the concept of paucity.

Downvote my post all you want, but Malthus didn't have a downwards facing arrow next to his.
arch is compiling it with alsa support, but only for a couple more versions.

https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/53195
I would venture to guess that many "higher quality" women have less trouble finding partners irl. They don't need to use online dating.
Obviously the solution is to encode success into the type system, such that functions which increase the chance Haskell will become a mainstream programming language fail to type-check.
Whether or not anonymity would change the "fairness" of the outcome, it's not at all clear that it would change the outcome itself: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_bias_on_Wikipedia
The plan is to just use interpretation of expressions for short-running queries. I've spent a lot of work in this release cycle making that faster, and allowing for an easier integration w/ less duplication between JIT and interpreted evaluation. There's two approaches for deciding when to JIT: a) based on query cost estimation. b) just do it after a threshold number of executions. I've not yet decided / experimented enough to make a call.

Additionally, at a later stage, caching of compiled programs will play a role, to reduce the frequency of llvm invocation.
The only 'data loading mechanism' it mentions is the company's cloud service, and I suppose cloud-syncing multiple cards and internal storage would be a hard UX to get right. (As a user, you'd presumably want the new empty card you put in to sync with a different set of documents from your cloud account.)
Leave the name, our UI team will love the extra ambiguity.
thanks. this is pretty scary.

guess I'll be using Chromium when that day comes, as I'd rather not run PulseAudio.
And unfortunately just the 1040 summary, not the whole return.

The question remains. Why hasn't he released his returns?
I didn't say anything about more fun. But <=20fps drops is NOT fun.
Just wait, the dating pool for men and women flip later in life. Quality men pair off with significant stability early on, and the remaining single men have significantly larger viable age range than women can generally expect.

Also: the biggest trick for being successful online is to keep your profile as brief as possible. Everything you say about yourself someone will find off-putting. You need just enough to show you're likely a real profile and give the people you contact something to ask you about if they decide to respond.
Dictanote: a note-taking app with voice-typing
> I still know so little since we do not have prior Zelda history.

It doesn't help, BotW is very different to all the previous games. Finding better swords and bows gets a lot better in time (probably another dozen hours), eventually you don't have to worry about stuff breaking so much (my biggest gripe early on).

But yes, you do have a misconception about nintendo, they are usually on the cutting edge of what can be done. That bit with the paraglider for instance, that's what stepping out into Hyrule field for the first time felt like 20 years ago.
And thus, VRML was reborn!!!!!

Seriously, anyone remember VRML? It was so cool... it was technically junk and implemented horribly, but it was awesome still somehow. Like goat simulator.
So what counts as evidence? Differences in hiring rates, different percentages of the workforce, pay gaps, lack of advancement, mountains of anecdata? Because it seems like when confronted with data, people are quick to shout "correlation" and "cultural factors".
I'll figure how to get that done!

The README there, isn't complete. I'll pack the README with more details on getting it to work on dev/prod machines. Hopefully, by evening :)
Exclusive Look at Trump's 2005 Tax Return – MSNBC
Ask HN: What skills a tech manager, director and VP should have?
As we have wide range of audience here, I am curious about this question. Most of us have dealt with good and bad managers and leaders.

What skills a manager should have?
What about technology director?
What about VP?

I find 3 layers of management above you sets tone of your department, have major impact on your career and progress as such.
Every single gif on that page loaded instantly for me. Chrome inspector says it took 300ms to load this gif: https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--6Z2c_2K...

When I paste that in an incognito window it displays and plays instantly.
Admiral, seven others charged with corruption in new ‘Fat Leonard’ indictment
you should be fine as arch are compiling their binary with alsa enabled

https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/P...

line 97 for reference
That was one of my first forays into coding. I remember doing the basic examples and then finding some of legitimate worlds and having my mind blown.

The good old days!
Robert and his team are really doing an impressive amount of progress and work on this.
I'd move on... a) people have a good, free way to get this type of information (from MacBook notifications or Google Now, for example) so it's not "wow" or a "must have"; b) your "setup cost" is too high; c) even if you solved these problems, there's no obvious path to revenue..

Consumer plays are hard - for someone to use your app, they'd have to give up their precious time... so unless it's a "WOW! I NEED THIS" and "I NEED TO TELL MY FRIENDS ABOUT THIS" it won't get scale...

I'd recommend reusing this code to make some "fully baked" ideas where users see content without doing anything.. something like techmeme.com for a niche area, amazon product watch, etc.
You could volunteer to rewrite Firefox’s entire ALSA backend to add multiprocess support.

That’s what caused this, because Mozilla doesn’t have the manpower to rewrite two backends, and so had to choose one (with the pulse backend being preferred, as the pulse maintainers help mozilla and fix bugs on their side, while mozilla reports getting no assistance or anything from the ALSA maintainers).
CRUDE OIL: Prints Rejection Candle, Targets Recovery Higher
Previous HN discussion from months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11792183

When I went to Singapore or Hong Kong with the Navy, all I got was a Big Mac, and I had to pay for it myself.
Can machine learning help?
How is this different from the default state of Western culture for the past century? Despite many positive social changes towards more equal opportunities for women, socially speaking, Western culture is still very traditional in terms of the common expectations surrounding the "courtship" dynamic between a man and a woman. The man is still expected to initiate and drive the interaction, while the woman is expected to be more passive about it. This is how it is off the Internet as well - women are routinely approached by men at bars/nightclubs etc., but it rarely happens the other way around. So why would online dating be any different?
Maybe Chromium? https://www.chromium.org/Home

It's prepackaged but I kind of lost track how it's different. It used to be that it didn't support flash but that might have changed.
1. How to Win Friends and Influence People - Dale Carnegie

2. Deep Work - Cal Newport

3. Personal MBA - Josh Kaufman
Someone should teach this immigrant the language already. :-)

http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/O/orthogonal.html
> Animated images aren't that smart, they're just a bunch of images, so you're storing every single frame.

GIF89a has a sort of limited delta encoding via the "do not dispose" option. If you write a frame with "do not dispose" and then write a frame with some transparent pixels, the transparent pixels will retain the colors from the previous frame.

It's rather primitive but it's better than nothing.
How to Make Kali Linux Bootable USB – Easy Steps
Counterpoint: A friend of mine had an okcupid profile where he dedicated 500 words to denying that he ever had sex with a bowl of macaroni and cheese. It was hilarious, and he's the one person I've met in my entire life who reversed the equation presented in the article.

That said, unless you've got some comic gold up your sleeve, you're probably right.
Thanks for trying out.

I'll revisit the UI, to be more explicit about clicking the refresh blog button after writing.
That's not something I've experienced, it certainly happens rarely. It also doesn't affect fun. Games were fun back when 25 FPS was the best you could hope for, even games that dip down to 1 or 2 at times (Goldeneye) could be fun.
Nah. The issue is that women generally have higher perceived self worth than men do in this regard, and so are more selective.
I wish I could. but I don't have the knowledge or the time.
Rent a Raspberry Pi 3 on a native IPv6-only network
> women have less trouble finding
> partners irl

Sexual partners? No trouble at all. Life partners? Much trickier.

Men have the sexual discernment of rabbits, but are pretty choosy about who they're willing to actually commit to. There's a non-trivial proportion of men who are only in their current relationships for easy access to sex.

Men complain to their friends about not being able to get laid, women complain to their friends about not being able to find a good man. Women complain that men don't want to be "just friends", men complain that women want commitment they're not willing to give yet.
Reminds me of VRML.
Someone needs to combine Vine with Tinder. A 2 second video of you saying hello, and you can only record via the app. This wouldn't change the general imbalance of dating, but it would help narrow down choices really quickly and maybe clear the backlog for women a bit.
Not charisma. It's never the kind of person 'the other side would like to have a beer with'. It's always a white redneck who would say racist things when drunk.
I don't really agree with this article.

I gave up on online dating a few years back, but as a guy I don't think it was all that bad. Someone said 1/50... I think it was closer to 1/5 women would respond. And look... if they don't respond, that's fine... it's nothing personal at that point. Women have to sift through the messages very quickly.

Anyway my advice for making it not suck so much for guys:

1) Find a girl friend who has some style, have her pick out your clothes (you can have her go through your closet and throw out everything that sucks if you want -- every 5 years or so it's probably not a bad idea to let a woman do this for you). I'm not the best looking guy... compensating by dressing right helps.

2) Make sure your pics aren't shirtless selfies, or drunk frat-boy poses, or just you standing in front of a boring ass wall; photos where you are out doing interesting things... hiking, at a cooking class... whatever. No selfies. Outdoor pics in good lighting taken by someone else. Make sure your pics are current.

3) Put some time into your profile, but make sure it's not a wall of text. A few tweet-like sentences that are funny or summarize yourself... that's what you need to go for. I think you want to be a more-fun version of yourself. Be a little goofy, don't take yourself too seriously. And be honest... you'll get what you're looking for.

4) When you write to girls... actually write to them. Not a book... but something individual. Copy and pasting the same message won't get you anywhere. Tweet-like comments about something on her profile... ask her a question, share a funny story... Avoid diving right into compliments. Give her something to respond to, something to play off of.

5) When you go out to dinner, have her pay half the first date. It's not cheap, it's fair. And you own't feel taken advantage of. Be friendly, be courteous, but don't be some white knight waiting to be a victim. Look, if you really had a great time and you don't care... pick up the check, but only if you really want to. You aren't paying for her time... she's not an escort. Splitting the check is fine.

6) Have things ready to talk about on the dates. Ask stupid questions. Bring up things you know about her from her profile... have fun with it. Reading just one book a month will give you an incredibly leg up here.

And be realistic. You aren't perfect... she won't be perfect. The goal is to find someone you enjoy being with. No reason you can't have a lot of fun along the way.
Love the idea of a more psychologically minded culture. I've gone through an acquisition, and thanks to my own personal therapy, I was able to keep a level head through the process. Would have loved to talk openly with my peers though..."excited" seemed to be the only emotion we could share.
I'd say a lot of luck, too? I did the same but my salary is only half that.

Edit: I do get to work remotely though, and the salary is in UK terms
They do, they for example provide fork of Postgres that is compatible with Oracle which is not free.
The part that I like the best about this one is that it gives you 1TB of transfer. Why? Overkill, no?

I think you'd still be better off going with Digital Ocean or something comparable. Probably performs about the same for a lower price.
Didn't see that coming!

I was about to buy a domain named - http://hexo.press, which would have been a bigger bummer.
Well, men tend to outnumber women in such sites, so that's the start... also, people are only likely to respond (with interest) in the top 10-25% of people they communicate with based on looks... from there, personality comes into play.

It works both ways. It's just the majority of women don't respond to the majority of men, regardless of crafting of the message.. though I must say that I've gotten more thanks but no thanks type responses than actual interest, which is still less than 1 in 15 messages out for any kind of response.

Of course the buffet effect works both ways... people tend to see the options, and gravitate towards a level of attractiveness and features they like, which removes most of the pool on that alone.. now, if you aren't in that attractiveness block, your options for matches won't work as well.

I think that OK Cupid does better than most at matching similar attractiveness levels in terms of who you even see. If you happen to get any response from more attractive people (even a thanks, but no thanks) you'll see a shift in the matches coming up all around.

Then again, I'm a bit of an odd duck who tries to read the profile before seeing a picture too closely. So will usually respond if something catches my interest in the writing.. and unlike most men and women, I'm perfectly happy making new friends. Getting serious with someone I met about a year ago via Facebook... All dating site experience for me in the last 5 years has been pretty bad all around.

Would think it would be cool if you had a short (300-500 character) block to write about yourself, where you pick matches on picture and words... so you either see a blurb, or a picture... if there are two matches (either you like both, or both of you like one or the other) then you can communicate and see the full profile. Would probably be a more effective matching strategy at least.
Why is it not a fair comparison? A page full of gifs in a browser gobbles bandwidth, can't be interrupted, eats lots of cpu. A page full of gifvs doesn't have any of these problems. One of these is a lousy user experience, the other one is not. I don't have to make both of these things a shitty user experience just so the comparison is 'fair'.
Don't ask fish how to fish.

Check out theredpill on reddit and never look back.
Digital Ocean don't rent out Raspberry Pi or provide IPv6-only connectivity, so it's quite a different kettle of fish
One had to wait a few more years to have rudimentary i/o standardized in Algol.
This is amazing. Why isn't it the top comment?
Yes, copying stacks are unsuitable for unrestricted C or C++ code. Segmented stacks might have problems (Go also switched away from them for the same hard-to-predict performance reason) but when you can't do stack moving I still think they're attractive.
Didn't even realize this article was 4 years old until I started reading the comments.

Dating apps are the ultimate hunting ground for individuals with borderline personality disorder. They provide an endless supply of one-night-stands and no-strings-attached sex, as well as playthings and victims when short-term and long-term relationships are desired.
In many cases all your data is actually in memory, especially when you can distribute your workload across many machines. If all your data is in memory, you'll very often hit CPU bottlenecks before memory bandwidth issues. Partially because bandwidth, disregarding latency, is just quite high, partially because expression evaluation in postgres isn't that well optimized (yet).
I suspect none of those 500 words were about him directly, so the respondents had something to ask about, and no information about him specifically to dislike.

Sounds like he found the butter zone with that.
Ha! I guess I'm showing my age. There used to be an associated vulnerability, which is why some frameworks won't let you do it. It appears that the vulnerability was fixed in what are now fairly old versions of browsers.

More info at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16289894/is-json-hijackin...
Is that the median quality of men, the median quality of men reaching out to you, or the median interactions you've had with men overall? Honest question.
Isn't this true of men as well?
You're better off having not played previous Zeldas IMO

I just finished the game and finally went online and realized I missed a ton of the new fun because I was playing like an old Zelda. I didn't realize the extent to which it's a sandbox.

To give 2 ideas that hopefully are not spoilers. You can throw things at enemies and theyll pick them up. So throw them something useless.

Another is you can for example attach and octo balloon to pretty much anything and then use a leaf to blow it somewhere.

I dont know if those are good examples I just know I really didn't look for all the creative ways to combind the things you can do
Mrs. Porter's 2nd Grade Class Survey
Oh but I want a linear kind though! I'd love to reimplement Rust with GHC for some kick-ass safe interopt.
Eh, sure, I guess, kinda? However, the article presents the situation as being: 1) very positive for women and 2) very negative for men. In reality, neither is entirely true.

As many, many women will tell you, the unrelenting torrent of creepy messages and dick picks is by no means an unmitigated positive. Yes, you can just open your inbox and find it full, but mostly it's full of utter crap, which actively drowns out the actual good messages. The article glosses over this; just ignore the "addled idiots" and exchange an email with the good guys. For many women it's more a case of "find inbox 100% full of unsolicited pictures of genitals; close it and go watch Netflix alone".

Similarly, as many guys can attest (including me, and other guys in the comments here), not being massaged out of the blue is survivable (it's no different than real life, and I'm somehow survived the experience of never being accosted on the street and asked out on a date...), and response rates are not that low if you're smart about it. People talk about 50 messages to get a reply; my experience is more like 10 to get a date (and no, I'm not conventionally attractive).

In short, I'd say online dating sucks for everyone, in different ways, but it's not that bad for anyone. "Soul crushing"? Hardly. And if all of your messages are being ignored, maybe it says something about your messages.

(The real trick, I think, is empathy. Think about the person you're messaging. They have an inbox full of terrible messages. What can you write that will stand out? How can you make the reply interesting? What do they want to see? They have too many messages; they're looking for a reason to filter your out; what do you need to avoid saying? Your goal is to get them to read the message, then click on your profile, then reply to your message. It's not that hard a problem!)
Thanks a bunch, NWS. Shoveling that wet slop was a frigging nightmare. I would have done it earlier if I'd known we were getting 6" snow with hours of pouring rain vs. the 18+" of snow that in the forecast all day.

Please give me the facts. Don't make decisions for me.
One the quotes that matters most to me and that I apply in my daily life is:

Judge a man by his questions rather than this answers.

Even if you've asked the right question, and lost, you're better off than not having asked the question at all.
I'm a man and in my late 20's (currently mid-30's and been with my partner for a few years now) had a great time using OKCupid. I was able to average 2-3 dates per week and received replies to ~25% of my messages.

Before anyone asks, I am average appearance. I don't drive (bicycle only). Things I had going in my favor: I'm white, had a flexible job (could meet whenever) and vegan diet (probably the biggest help as vegan women way outnumber vegan men even here in Portland).

Here are my tips for men seeking women:

1. Say as little as possible in your profile.

2. Spend as close to no time as possible on the messages you send. Should be 3-5 sentences max and end in a relevant question that the recipient can answer.

3. If you get a response, don't waste time with back and forth. Immediately ask to meet for coffee.

4. Ask questions and listen. When someone tells a story, don't immediately tell one that's similar-- ask a question.

5. Open your age range to include women who are older than you are (try as much as a decade, not just 1-2 years).
All true, but those aren't necessarily problems with the concept of a gif, and could be fixed with another format, that isn't necessarily a full on video.

I think the concept of gif's is fairly great, but the actual format itself has tons of issues.
Rachel Maddow sure cares. She's made a Game of Thrones ice block like festival out of it.

I'm sure that her advertisers are also quite happy tonight too.

What a circus.
The measures of quality for men and women are different. A woman's quality is how hot she is, a man's quality is how much status, motivation, wealth, strength and awareness he's cultivated. Looks for women, energy for men. (the energy you come across with, not how much energy you have) If sex is your #1 desire and motivator in life, life is much easier for women.
Don't bother with online dating. First of all the quality of women is much lower than any you'd meet IRL. Secondly, they purposefully set absurdly high standards. Thirdly, if physical looks aren't your strong point, you cannot really make a good impression because that is what they are going to be judging you on. What you write in your profile is close to useless

If you have trouble finding women, move to a big city and start working on meeting people. It's pretty much a numbers game for men of average/below-average looks.
Thank you! Regarding customizations, things like SEO, custom footers & pages are in fact very much possible. It's just that I didn't want to put in a lot of effort, with my itch being the only validation :)

I'll keep working on it, focussing on customization options :)