skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Thanks, my thoughts exactly. Especially the 2nd paragraph
http://perltricks.com is very good.
No problem at all if you use a TrackPoint. I don't even have a mouse, I use the ThinkPad USB keyboard at work which includes a TrackPoint. I know some people dislike them with a passion, and they don't look fashionable, but I can't use a keyboard without one any more.
It's more object oriented don't you think?

If you have each part of your code running on different processes, then failures are isolated.

Unless I'm reading your question wrong...
I think all these tools give you structure, though.

Every project is setup in an identical or similar way, which makes it easy for other developers to jump in and understand what's going on.
There is a recent trend in anti-Twitter chatter. I seem to remember msn-bots being all the rage once upon a time.
But the real problem is giving a shit. Being a genius is nothing. Be kind to you.
Seems quite straight forward, to find a problem worth solving - you need domain knowledge.
This is a favourite of mine. I watch it every once in a while.
Welcome to dependency hell! Working for years in different "php environments" I learnt that most (web) developers I met in this field tend to use as much new fancy tools out there without thinking about business value and longterm impact. At the end of the day you might end up with more than four dependency systems...

To respond to your initial question if we really need so much dependency systems: No, we don't need to!

As the author already needs to use composer to set up PHP dependencies why not use composer for the other packages required? It's not a problem to get the common needed libraries via composer which dramatically reduces dependency complexity, deployment and build scripts because you don't need that much tools.
FWIW the Wordpress situation and specifically my personal site getting hacked even though I was a sysadmin working in hosting at the time are why I love static site generators. Moveable Type was always amazing and scaled with traffic literally 100x as well as Wordpress out of the box (Varnish and W3 Total Cache can help if you ever need it, but again "out of the box"), so I'm happy to see that things like Jekyll and Hugo are trendy. The fundamental idea behind SSGs just makes so much sense to me; optimize it for viewing (in terms of computational power spent on serving traffic), which it'll be doing many more times than it will be created. Why generate a page on each visit when that page will be exactly the same until the post gets updated? I understand that many WP sites are much much much more than blogs (like shopping carts, ooh god why), but that's a different conversation entirely.

Wordpress (and any dynamic CMS) is like having a library full of whiteboards with the contents of the books written on them, with about the same potential for vandalism.
The downsides are pretty clear too, of both these things. I see notability as a necessary evil for some kinds of good deeds.
Maybe a programmer accidentally added another zero to the priority value for keeping the secret (say, 100 instead of 10). Hard constraints are the limiting case of soft constraints.
Hello Bubble
Ah come off it, this is a disappointing response. You may be right but nobody reading this would have any reason to believe so. At the most basic level, if you believe that diet change beats supplementation or fixes the problems claimed, you have surely done research into this beyond personal experimentation. If you share your work then you are likely to persuade more people, and hence encourage better health behaviours among your your ​peers -- assuming your findings to be true and reproducible.

Conversely, if you say you've got all the answers and everyone else just needs to reproduce your hard work, but you won't share your process or results, you can expect to antagonise people.

This applies throughout life and not just in "science".
People don't have $400 for an emergency but they have smartphones, Jeezy shoes or various other random unnecessary crap. People don't have $400 for emergencies because they choose not to. Look at Black Friday sales -- people seem to have $400 to fight over TVs or game consoles. Even the really poor in the US seem to find money to buy TVs or subscribe to cable/satellite TV. Visit any public housing complex in America and there is a large number of homes with Satelite dishes. I am not saying there's anything wrong with that but I am also saying that people do make choices.

I am not a particular fan of Warren Buffet, but he's a billionaire and lives far more discretely than your typical 5 figure "millionaire" who's driving a leased BMW and drinking Grey Goose at the club.

Certainly there are actual poor; that's not in dispute, but the middle classes typically just prioritize things differently -- which contributes to their station.
What about anchors using name?
“Enterprise Vulnerability Management” Slides by Alex Leonov
Google DeepMind is building a blockchain-style system for healthcare