skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ai take your points both are arguable which I guess I'd the nature of politics.

I think you take my second point as saying whether are right or wrong merely i was saying that it was fairly well indicated that the state apparatus' advice was stay in.

And the effects? Well it was only ever going to be a couple point difference in GDP compounded over thirty years. Not the sky falling in. But that adds up to serious difference in gdp. The thing with these binary decisions is the road forks at that moment and we will never see where the other road goes. Although I am surprised with the resiliency of the economy this far, could it be that it takes time to move capital out without panic, I am not sure I'm not an expert.

As is probably clear I would have preferred staying in, without going into details I think being together with Europe has a lot of benefits which counterweigh the negatives.
PlayStation VR (and ordinary PS4) is currently the only platform on which Rez Infinite is available. Playing Rez Infinite in VR has been the most intense gaming experience of my life -- I'm not shitting you.
> Is anyone using these? The blog post is put out by a company I've never heard of

I spent time trying to figure out if hypothes.is even uses the protocol and data model in their own software. I'm not confident enough in my analysis to say they absolutely aren't, but I'm also not convinced they are really using it. They would probably counter that it wasn't even a standard yet, but I'm not even sure how close their current model is to this.

They did have some of their employees in the W3C working group. Several of the others seemed to be in the "library" field.
And I wonder if there's email functionality in that thing.
Sorry for the lack of substance. I don't like to get too specific on Medium, but rather just use it to dump general feelings and emotion. That seems to be the community standard too.

Reposting to HN is different though. What gave me the original feeling of FDD rather than full spectrum research is all of the things that don't get reposted or show up on news. I am sure that people are still doing that research, it just doesn't "have a hat on", as one of my professors would say.
*DIAGNOSTIC* THE TEST FOR EQUALITY BETWEEN NON-INTEGERS MAY NOT BE MEANINGFUL

UNIVAC 1107 FORTRAN IV error message for this, 1967.
There's been broad support for economic globalization since WWII. Old-school conservatives (now "libertarians") and populists have opposed it. But it's been an antiwar strategy for liberals, and a profit-maximization strategy for capitalists. And it's gutted the US middle class, or at least the blue-collar part.
It is in some cultures, as long as it is against members of other groups.
Calling Bullshit
Sorry, i'll take the N800 before the N900.

And the Maemo platform kinda lives on in Sailfish. If going systemd and wayland can be called "lives on". Never mind that i suspect they in part got developer attention because of some experiences developing (for) the Maemo platform.
depending on the one you get, duh
Banned from Wikipedia, banned from Reddit, now nullc is moving on to HN to peddle his bulls* company and ideas... Maybe its time for some self-reflection and ask yourself, just why is it that everyone hates nullc so much?

P.S. Leave Bitcoin alone, please, just leave her alone already you monster.
What resources do you use to look into the funding sources and scope of climate science studies?

I've seen quite a few articles here on HN based off of NOAA and NASA studies regarding other interesting climate topics, such as variation in jet streams and ocean currents, changes in rainfall (especially California), and the development of storms. That's just my haphazard exposure, certainly not a definitive answer.

Are climate scientists so specialized that they can't pivot to another discipline within meteorology?

Do climate scientists even stay within the field more than other academics? I was under the impression that the vast majority of post-docs and PhD candidates perform laboratory work for a few years, fail to get tenure, and then work in private industry in a tangentially related field for much better compensation. Post-docs and PhD candidates are also notoriously underpaid. Wouldn't tenure follow from a groundbreaking study that disproved mainstream scientific belief, instead of boringly replicating existing findings?

Of course there is an economic link to everything. You still haven't established the link in a meaningful fashion. "I'm just asking questions" isn't good enough to present a convincing argument.
Annotation itself is great, but there are other (unsolved?) problems - I just recently came across this very implementation thanks to a HN comment - after trying it out it suffers from not being able to tied to revisions of pages - install the plugin and go to the home page of any major news outlet - there are comments from years ago - that works fine if its a news article - but not on a page that changes every day if not hourly. Also to get rid of comment widgets on pages you need to be able to subscribe which I don't see any way of doing.
We manage many Google integrations and they had a large number of failed auth tokens during the same window. I'm guessing it was related - but no details have been shared yet.
> 1. That's a bit like saying if powered aviation goes away tomorrow (as in, it is to be completely proven to be impossible), every single engineer at Boeing would be out of a job.

Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. If you were doing a study on whether powered aviation is going away tomorrow, 99% (well probably 100%) of Boeing engineers would tell you that it isn't. Obviously. But you cannot use that as a proof that powered aviation is not going away. Even if it was going away, that's just not how you prove it. See? If every single powered aviation engineer in the world peer reviewed a paper on powered aviation not going away, it's still not any better or any more proof of it. There is too much financial incentive. It's not a good argument.

Now how much more so in the case of climate science where you can't clearly see airplanes flying above your head?

> 2. The incentive structure doesn't work that way. If you could show that global warming isn't real, yes, all the other climate scientists will lose their job, but you will be rich beyond your dreams. Every billion-dollar petro-business will shower you with praise and contracts. You will be hailed as a savior of mankind, saving a million jobs and preventing policy mistakes that would have cost many billion dollars. The stake has never been higher.

There's a few scientists trying to show this. They even have some papers that have convinced many non-climate scientists, although all have massive flaws if you look closely. Regardless, no matter how good those papers were, do you really believe all climate scientists would just sit down and say 'oh well, it was a nice life while it lasted' ? If a paper was released that truly did refute all climate science, nearly every climate scientist would declare it false, probably without even reading it. They'd look for spelling mistakes in the paper and declare it false if they found one. They'd tear it apart and convince themselves it was false, because their lives would literally depend on it.

> So who's brainwashing all those French, Japanese, Chinese climate researchers to conspire with NASA against their own interest?

Do you think researchers work in silos devoted to their own country without using the work of others...? That's not really how it works imo. Besides, climate change is massively good news for China -- they're making a fortune off 'green' solutions. I just checked and France and Japan are also, although to a much lesser extent. So I don't think this works as proof either.
Hashes don't currently know their own lengths, so I don't see why they'd need to.
It's interesting that they actually still stand a chance to succeed with these even after they took too long to do the obvious i.e. ditch Symbian and adopt Android.
Ask HN: What's the point of viral silly questions on Linkedin aside the likes?
Alice and Bob don't help or hinder your argument in any way. It just seems like a non sequitur.

Selection of choice to rent vs buy typically isn't driven by net wealth change considerations; rather, it's an investment in an area, because the transaction costs of house purchases are much higher than changing rental leases, and thus you need to stay in a bought house longer to spread the costs. In particular, houses bought for living (rather than rental) are more often selected for life-changing events, like starting a family, or downsizing when children have left the family home.

Further, your bald assertion that unrealized rental income will be greater than rent expense otherwise incurred - if I read this right, it means you think people will buy a more expensive property than they would rent - I think is wholly unjustified. I think you've got it exactly backward, and that's certainly the case in my rental vs purchasing history: I've always rented places that I couldn't afford to buy.

When I was younger, I valued being closer to the heart of the city (London in my case). That meant denser living, apartments, etc. When I chose to buy, I couldn't afford to buy the places I'd been renting, but also my values had changed: I wanted somewhere with more space, not least because I had more stuff (like motorcycles, which meant a garage; and an office distinct from the living room; etc.)
We were in the online-video space, which made sense to be based in LA.

Our investor was also based in California, which made sense to leverage his network there to raise subsequent rounds of funding.
I think google likes to repeat the same mistakes
The registry/registrar system may not be perfect, but that's what we have (and there is an appeals process). It's not as bad as you make it seem. You can not redelegate google.com for example, even if you work at a registrar. Whereas any CA could generate a new certificate, today.

As long as domains are what you generate certificates for you might as well assert that delegation in a cryptographically secure way. It may also be a good basis to make domain transfers more secure.
Great. More non-removable spyware craplets. Just what we need.
>nobody wants that.

>I want to

I agree. It's important to direct wants of the consumer into frequent use. The real value in marketing is creating cultures where people must consume to participate.

Consumer needs are path dependent, so it's important to not allow avenues for countercultures or ways to avoid traps.
I am John Postlethwait. You could have submitted a PR. That's when/how open source works. I even state that I am happy to look at incoming changes, I'm just not actively maintaining it.

This is a very minor, nigh silly, project but this sort of wanton bifurcation hurts open source's reputation and is already a huge problem in the Node community.
That would be up to the endpoints hosting annotations. They would need to build anti-spam or reputation into their server system. Not part of the specification.
This is the first I've heard of this annotation initiative, so maybe I'm misunderstanding... Annotations are tied to a particular location within the content but maintained independently of the content and publisher?

What happens if the content changes? Random example: Someone highlights a picture of salad and notes "my favorite food!" and then the publisher changes the image to show roadkill instead of salad.
You continue to attack straw men on a controversial topic, and that is what is uncivil and against the guidelines of this site. Worse, we've seen these scarecrows a million times before and they predictably fail to ever bring us any closer to any insight on the topic.
didn't know, thanks - haven't actually watched it.

(edit, sine HN doesn't let me reply: why would it be important to have watched it? According to Wikipedia, it is set at JFK. Watching it would not have added a new impression about that.)
I thought it was

(a / b) != (a / b)
I doubt that any other country gives more money in the form of subsidies or social assistance programmes, both per capita (giver and receiver) and in absolute numbers.

They also have free healthcare and enjoys free education up to university, including financial aid for studies and a home equipment loan.

There are also very few signs of structured racism, when looking at various ethnic groups with comparable education, etc, although it of course exists, just like all other biases and generalisations in a society.

There have been a substantial asylum related immigration for long enough that we can look at the second generation, and their level of education, crime, etc, and draw the conclusion that whatever we are doing, it's not really enough or possibly not even the correct things to do.
There's lots of evidence to show that climate science deserves a lot of funding -- our world kind of depends on it. Believe me, I'm not in disagreement with you there.

However, I think there is a massive causal link there. If you're looking to do your PHD and your advisor tells you to research climate change because of all the grant money, that seems like a massive link to me. Then once you have your PHD on climate change, the obvious next step for funding is to do more research on climate change.
Why do you insist that the economic incentive is the only, the primary, and most relevant incentive there? Surely you must understand that a lot of people want to do a good job, which in this case means doing good science (which is an abstract concept, unrelated to people's personal motivations). Wanting to do a good job that stands up to scrutiny of one's peers is as much of an incentive as anything. Haven't you experienced that in your own work? Indeed, historically, science has got a lot of things right. I think you might be unreasonably cynical about all this.
Turning off denormals won't fix the issue that a long double has a wider exponent field than a double, and can represent smaller magnitudes without relying on denormals.
Call me naive, but I REALLY think people are overreacting on this. Yes, the timing does seem quite coincidental given the Cloudflare bug, but Google has a pretty good record of being transparent with these things.

On top of this, Google does not use Cloudflare and as far as I know there have been no reports of accounts actually being comprised, only logged out. I would wager whatever maintenance routine they were carrying out accidentally invalided some user sessions.
Even if we focus on 120k writes and ignore the low transaction number then it's still an average result. They use c3.4xlarge to run 5 shards each with 3 replication factor. It's 1500 writes per core (120k / (5*16)). Etcd easily does 5227 writes (I believe it can do even more) on "Standard DS12 v2" so it's 1306 per core which is very similar.
What do you mean?

Edit, since HN doesn't let me reply: the point is the article suggest something sinister going on, whereas it is mostly just business as usual. Note that claims about the effectiveness of CA also come mostly from CA executives. It could almost be a PR article for CA...

Other aspects also reek of conspiracy theory, like the "you set up outlets like Breitbart to replae the established media" - really, just like that, you set up news sites that are more popular than the established ones? And with a shocking, enourmus investment of 2 million dollars, too? It really seems as if Billionaires control everything, don't they? In fact, reading the article, I get the impression that rich people are generally evil - leftist ideology much?
Here is something I've always wondered about. Coal, oil and gas is originally organic matter. By the creation of coal, oil and over millions of years the overall level of free carbon was reduced and probably lower temperatures. However by starting to burn oil, coal and gas we are increasing the freed carbon again back to some earlier historic level.

I seems we would just be setting us up to a return to a even lusher greener planet like during the Jurassic period. Of course it would be a disaster for our current civilization but it does not seem world-ending.
Yes, there's a 1 year exclusive until it goes to PC.
This book as a prerequisite to anyone who wants to get into machine learning imo.
I just want to say one thing: What a beautiful interactive chart!
Yes. Vito is correct.
There are 2 kinds of employees.
Repeaters - Fit for operations, repeat the operations, increment the operations and using the tools.

Innovators - Sharp,Imagine tools, Tools used innovatively and think out of box, not afraid of being called as 1 with crazy ideas and innovative.
This seems kind of like a cross between a uuid and a plain hash. Perhaps it would be better to incorporate the hash into a uuid. Uuids already have metadata.
#following
The little scene in the beginning of "Enter the Dragon" in which Lee trains a student has remained with me for many years as a broadly applicable koan for lots of things.

"It is like a finger pointing at the moon..."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tY-AgR3dFr8
And that's fine, given that I nor that commenter have the data. But if you believe your critique against the science of the matter is something the whole set of climate scientists happen to have overlooked for decades, the burden is on you to read the actual papers and find out if you're right or not.

If you're right and all of them have overlooked it, you'll have material for a hell of a paper yourself: There's nothing more juicy than a paper that mathematically proves that a pile of accepted scientific literature is flawed.

Imagining possible flaws of a paper before reading it is so easy that it's hard to really strike gold (it is equally easy for the authors and reviewers). But it is also an enjoyable way to learn how those flaws have been taken care of.
9 Magic Phrases You Should Use to WOW Your Customers
If the money goes to support the associated health costs then it's still win-win.
Mathematicians becoming data scientists
Almost every major Indian startup has made the same mistakes as Snapdeal
>accept() on a fd that has already been closed.

Why are people doing that?
I fondly remember editing the raw metadata in a Gluster cluster to recover it after a three-node split brain :)
Then in what way does any of that condemn climate science? The PhD student in your example decides to study climate science because a committee of scientists somewhere decided climate science is objectively important enough to get people to study it. Seems okay to me.
I'm just wondering who these people are that are still making phone calls? I barely make 60 minutes of talk a month on my mobile. When I had a dumbphone the world was a different place.
The LYNQ: A New USB-C Hub on Kickstarter
This account has been posting a lot of unsubstantive comments. Please don't do this here.
Layer3 MySQL HA
There is no built-in detection of content changes in the standard, but it is designed to be potentially robust to changes.

It depends what type of specifier you use. The data model provides a number of specifier types. A "text position selector" would lock in the annotation at a certain point in the text like the 142nd character. An "xpath selector" would use a DOM-like notation to place the annotation.

If your annotation is a "highlight" then you would need to use these selectors within a "range selector" with a specified start and end point.

If you want your annotations to be robust to content changes, you will probably need to use multiple specifier types. This is allowed by the specification but it felt very clumsy to me to implement.

If the target is available at multiple URLs, there is something available to handle it, but the hosts of the content need to add links to the canonical URL so your annotation software can use that.
I don't feel like this was given enough time:

> One option is to use SO_REUSEPORT and create multiple listen sockets sharing the same port number. This approach has problems though - when one of the file descriptors is closed, the sockets already waiting in the accept queue will be dropped

Yes, it's a problem if you use it across processes... but if you have a single long lived process with each thread listening on a separate queue, isn't that the simplest solution?
While I don't think you should know how to implement bubble sort on the fly in an interview, you should probably understand what it is at a conversational level, along with merge sort and quick sort, especially if the position is senior or lead and requires a CS degree.
If you don't have the money for rift or vive, PSVR is a solid choice. Doesn't have quite the content (yet), but what is there is high quality. The form factor is much more comfortable than the rift or vive...
interesting .. will try and fix that.

Thanks for the pointer
They definitely implement it; they're one of the implementations used to show implementation experience of the Web Annotations Model per the implementation report linked to from the W3C Recommendation.
Disappointed with the 3310 being Dual Band 2G only. If it had a modern 3G chipset in it I would happily throw down money for it.

As it stands its a curious oddity.
Sorry for the lack of substance. I don't like to get too specific on Medium, but rather just use it to dump general feelings and emotion. That seems to be the community standard too.

No worries, I didn't intend that to be a heavy criticism. Just a passing observation, that it would be nice to see some pointers to the things that you are excited about.
They should've used Celsius in the article.
> convince otherwise rational people to make an irrational decision

This is a myth that economics will not let go of. Almost all human decisions are influenced by emotions. Here's two examples:

[A] Would you rather receive $49 or have a 50% of receiving $100?
- The rational decision would be to choose the 50% chance since your expected value would be $50. Most people go for the $49, humans are irrationally risk-averse in terms of gains.

[B]
1)You have $1,000 and you must pick one of the following choices:
Choice A: You have a 50% chance of gaining $1,000, and a 50% chance of gaining $0.
Choice B: You have a 100% chance of gaining $500.

2)You have $2,000 and you must pick one of the following choices:
Choice A: You have a 50% chance of losing $1,000, and 50% of losing $0.
Choice B: You have a 100% chance of losing $500.

Time after time, when presented with this problem, people chose B for question 1 and A for question 2. A rational person would choose either A or B for both questions. The expected value is the same for both questions, but it shows that people are risk averse in gains and risk seeking in mitigating losses.

Couple this with the number of people who actually understand the concept of compounded interest rates and yikes.

Just nitpicking, but people are not otherwise rational. Study after study has shown that emotions are involved in nearly every,if not all, decisions that we make.
Senior eng in big 4 can easily earn these money...(or in bank sector)
I bought a Nokia 130 late last year and am really happy with it.

I just wanted a small dual-sim phone, don't need any other features than the ones it provides.
Apple macOS Sierra 10.12
they also had the OnePlus X which was OPO hardware crammed into a smaller form factor. I would have loved to migrate from my OPO to that but alas they don't make the X anymore.
>Of course it would be a disaster for our current civilization but it does not seem world-ending.

That's the point. We probably can't destroy all life on earth. But we can destroy the conditions that created our civilization and sustained it.