skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
If you want to cut hateful hours of deploying, give it a go with Bitrise. Thank you for your awesome service and support!
You still need reaction mass.
We spent a month dealing with intermittent deliverables issues and had to cycle through a number of IP addresses. Deleiverbility issues due to IP reputation or receiver rate limits are fairly easy to identify and it would be great to see some more proactive assessment of problems from mailgun.

We did eventually get on a solid IP and after I spent several days calling every little local ISP that was flagging our emails based on razor2 our last deleiverbility issues went away.

One thing I'd love to see is a direct integration of mail events with Slack. Currently we pass the events through ourselves via a webhook.
Serious question: What would happen if -- at your point of origin -- you asked a friend to set the passcode on your phone, and you would only get the passcode on arrival after clearing border/customs? CBP can ask you to unlock your phone, but without knowing the passcode, what can they (or you) do?
99.99% of the experts are only 4: Yehuda Bauer, Yitzak Arad, Jean-Claude Pressac and Raul Hilberg. Have you read their books to see what exactly they think happened? I have and they do not think as low of revisionists as you seem to. There is no need to be emotional about this subject. We're all interested in the truth. Read Arad's sources' testimonies for yourself and see if you believe then fully (it includes bears and eagles attacking Jews in cages) and then ask yourself how likely it is that those testimonies are the correct ones versus those of the formar camp inmates who defend there were no gas chambers. All those tesimonies are available onlinr, sometimes with video of the inmate him/herself telling their story.
> Because they get exploded in single-threaded performances, so they have to pit their 8-core parts against Intel's 4 cores.

I assume that they are getting blown out of the water on single core performance and hence picked up an i7-7700k. We'll see if I made the right choice on March 2nd when real benchmarks surface.
Large, boring company job used to coincide with stability. That seems to be far less true now than 25 years ago. The gig economy of today is far different than what last generation grew up with.
Fascinating thank you
I've read about laser systems for sending unmanned crafts at high speed: http://www.space.com/29950-lasers-power-tiny-interstellar-sp...
I think this is why there is no life on any of the planets. The star is just too young. However, the star could have a life span of 5 trillion years, it is safe to say that life could form on the planets and have plenty of time to develop.
It's not money, it's the basic rocket equation: Newtonian acceleration requires fuel and the mass of fuel makes acceleration more costly.

Relativity makes things even worse.
what would be included in a "basic hardening"?
> Also you are shouting a bit hyperbole. Each new standard does not erase the prior standard. C++17 does not remove the features from ++14. Each new version focuses on different things, and they have been really great additions.

I am not shouting hyperbole at all. Each new standard completely changes the way you are supposed to write new C++ code. The problem is that the legacy code was written the old way, with all the problems that entails.

So, you have to know everything about the new way AND you have to know all the pitfalls of the old ways for when you need to go debugging through the old code. Um, no thanks.

I've been following C++ since 1996-ish. I stopped following it after 2011. It's just not worth the pain.
>whites are a non-diverse group of people

Even if we assume that this is true (despite the fact that it's not) what does it have to do with printing articles with headlines that read "{INSERT NON-WHITE RACE HERE} miraculously succeeds in life!"?
Check out "Rocheworld."
Upvote for doing the math, but we're going to have to ditch traditional chemical rockets for this kind of trip. Fortunately, we're making progress on alternatives.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2017/02/nasas-longshot-bet-o...
Hmm, this smells a lot like Holocaust denial.
Core Nanobox team member here. A brief history of how Nanobox came about. We are a small team of developers who were doing a lot of medium to large-ish web applications and found ourselves having to do the same, tedious tasks over and over when deploying apps to production servers. So we built Nanobox to automate the process, save us time, and preserve our sanity.
Fair enough, ion3 sounds quite interesting, unfortunate that development stopped.

As for XMonad, like Awesome WM, you can probably customize things however you see fit. Just need to know Haskell/Lua and the WM well enough to do so, which may be less than obvious for most.
The years of collected data on personalizing search results, what different demographics expect, etc...Is a big barrier as well.

I believe they are able, for example, to know I want "Apache" the software organization even if I've never typed it before, because they've seen my previous software related searches. And...Injected some behavior based on searches by other people like me.

Someone else is getting much different results for the same term...Again, even if it's for the first time.

When I hear people say they don't like duckduckgo's results for a search term, it seems to usually trace back to "no tracking equals no personalization".
Hackers show no mercy–even for pot dispensaries
Docker deployment certainly can be tricky.

Regarding automation for app deployment, isn't there a point where you've automated the process too much and removed some of the intelligent decision making that requires a human?
Probably used jet airplane more of a frame of reference for the general public.
In the Q&A session they said it's difficult to constrain the age of the long-lived ultraviolet dwarf stars once they finish the active early phase, as their lifecycle progresses so slowly. They live for more than a trillion years, compared to stars like our sun which are larger and burn through their fuel in less than 10 billion years.

It's somewhat counterintuitive, but the bigger a star is, the faster it uses up its fuel, despite having much more of it. As size increases, the rate of fusion in the star's core increases such that the extra fuel isn't enough to prevent the lifespan from shortening. In fact, a common type of supernova occurs in stars that are at least 8 times the size of the sun, burn through their fuel in less than 100 million years, and then go out in style.

Crash course astronomy has some great videos on this stuff:
https://youtu.be/PWx9DurgPn8
I wonder what planets that close together would do to tides on one another.
Yes it is also our product. We use it internally every day as well.
"Failing gracefully" is still failing. I don't want my app to fail, gracefully or otherwise.
Working with Fashion Models – How We Use Neural Nets at Lyst
There needs to be a new unit that describes "a speed equal to the fastest humans have been able to travel in space" instead of "light years". Let's call it an "Apollo", since that record is held by the Apollo missions to the moon at 11,080 m/s. Speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s. So humans can travel at ~0.0000367 x light speed, or 349,418,880,000 m/year.

So instead of saying 40 light years, we'd say 27,076 Apollo years.
Once again, the universe shows that not only is it strange, it's stranger in ways we can't possibly imagine. This is truly a golden age of space science and, as Kay said in M.I.B., "I wonder what we'll know tomorrow.".
Well, they were switching architectures and wanted to retain me in a contracting capacity. They'd offered to keep me on but I was ready to move on. I got a nice severance and I'm still receiving contract income from that client. Getting my final check soon.

Doing all that without a contract in place would have been tough on them to say the least. They had another Rails consultant lined up to replace me, but I was a lot cheaper.
Yup, that's correct :)
Also if you are comparing us to Travis, we have both Bitbucket & GitLab integrations in addition to GitHub.

Our build machines are faster to use, too, because the most used VMs are pre-booted, which saves 1-2 minutes.
I don't see the actual guidelines, only Contents, Introduction and Conventions. On iOS Chrome /Safari. Also the fixed buttons overflows.
Yeah, just look for a kernel package the same name (including minor version numbers) as the upsteam redhat one. You can find info on Redhat Errata here[1]. CentOS looks to have some form of errata listing (possibly non-official) here[2].

You could theoretically locate teh SRPM for the kernel and build from that, but I haven't done that in years and the last I heard RedHat was going to make that harder because they weren't happy Oracle was copying their work wholesale and then selling it as a competitor, so that may be harder now?

Redhat is finished, CentOS is probably just lagging a little bit.

1: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/

2: http://centoserrata.nagater.net/list.html
There are only 4 prominent people saying it happened with sources to back it up and all of them readily admit the most important sources are all from verbal testimonies and not documentation of any kind. See Raul Hilberg's second book on the sources for the holocaust:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/1566633796/
We use bitrise for iOS CI. Nothing but great things to say about them!
Cryptocurrencies need a relatively stable coin generation scheme. Hits from fuzzing is typically very bursty, often produces nothing, and changing the fuzzing scheme slightly can reveal completely different results.

It's just too variable.
Make sure you turn on the native TypeScript Language Service feature, otherwise you'll be getting your IDE's parser, which is always behind the standard and doesn't work very well:

> Select the Use TypeScript Service check box to get native support from the TypeScript Language Service according to the up-to-date specifications. In this case syntax and error highlighting is performed based on the annotations retrieved from the TypeScript Language Service while code completion lists contain both suggestions from the TypeScript Language Service and suggestions calculated by IntelliJ IDEA itself.

https://www.jetbrains.com/help/idea/2016.2/typescript-suppor...
> about...2,000 Saturn V rockets

Or about 670 BFRs [1].

It would take 6 cycles of tripling size and/or performance to get a single system with enough thrust to meet your 7/42 year schedule. The Saturn V first flew in 1967 [1]; SpaceX plans to launch its Interplanetary Transport System (ITS) in 2022 or 2024 [2]. That's an expected 60 years to triple performance.

[1] http://waitbutwhy.com/2016/09/spacexs-big-fking-rocket-the-f...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saturn_V

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interplanetary_Transport_Syste...
I just wanted to mention that the path to modprobe is something reversible (containers aside) if the sysadmin wants autoloading. /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe is not writable from a container.

Disabling module loading is not reversible, you need to reboot.
Because perhaps the inmates that saw the gas chambers did not get a chance to provide testimonials?
Maybe you should read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denying_the_Holocaust (Deborah Lipstadt, 1993)
Well, it's "at least" 500m, but is probably much more[1]:

"Determining the ages of such small stars is difficult because they evolve so slowly over their lifetimes of trillions of years but it is estimated to be in excess of a half a billion years and is probably much more."

And abiogenesis occurred on Earth within about 500m years of the Earth's formation, so life can clearly arise pretty quickly. It's complex, multi-cellular life that seems to be hard part. Although this is based on our observations of a single example.

[1] http://www.drewexmachina.com/2016/05/03/habitable-planet-rea...
XMonad is moving really fast. It was on 0.11 for quiet sometime and now it it 0.13.
Love/Miss XMonad, since I use mac work. One of the reason s I want to get a Linux machine for personal use.
I think a better suggestion for early-stage founders might be to focus on information coming in rather than information going out.

You should do as much sales & marketing as you need to generate a reaction from your target users. Then pay careful attention to that reaction and adapt the product. The focus is always about learning rather than evangelizing - putting a half-baked product out there and then blasting the hell out of Facebook/Twitter/Medium/PR doesn't usually get you very many recurring projects, but putting a half-baked product out there, attempting to sell it to a few engaged potential customers, and then adapting it in response to their feedback might.
since it's the default.

It's not the default for the command line compiler. Also, all types (except Any/null/undefined) are non-nullable under that option, so that's not what makes object special (it's the no primitive types that is important).

>tsc test.ts
>tsc test.ts --strictNullChecks
> test.ts(3,1): error TS2322: Type 'null' is not assignable to type 'object'.
Interesting, do you have more details about this?
Of course, #askNasa didn't win me a question, but could any astrobiologists comment on this question: Tidal locking means the planets would always have a side facing the star, leading to very different thermodynamics in terms of climate and weather on the planet, not to mention radiation. Doesn't that very much hurt the chances for life on those planets?
There's a well known analysis that shows they're asymptotically equivalent to B-trees. You can tune a B-tree to better exploit cache locality. Other kinds of ordered binary trees are far less complicated to code and have similar performance characteristics.
MAGIX Movie Edit Pro 2017 Premium Crack Plus Serial Key Download
Good point, this is in TFA:

"Although at least some fraction of each planet could harbor liquid water, it doesn't necessarily follow that they are habitable. TRAPPIST-1 emits about the same amount of X-ray and ultraviolet radiation as the Sun does, which could chew away at any protective atmospheres the planets might have."

But it's complicated. For example, apparently the energetic radiation can help by stripping away the H/He atmosphere. For more, see:

https://academic.oup.com/mnrasl/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/m...
I often wonder what people actually have understood other than "the Nazis were bad". It's not enough to not be a racist, and it's not enough to have excuses for putting up with war and exploitation and double standards.

We live in an age where narcissism and outer appearances are glorified more than ever, where showing off and fitting in are accepted and the only debate is on how to best do that, where the atrocities and all our complicity in them is a constant background hum, where tribalism and identity politics and other things are considered "natural", where people hide their own person behind pseudo-objectivity, surveillance is everywhere and eternal, robocops are around the corner, we engage in constant double think about "consumers" deserving the crap shoved onto them by corporations. It's all just human nature, it's "science" (with a deus ex machina always around the corner) -- I would say things like the above are the things which people like Hannah Arendt or Sebastian Haffner or other people I would consider heavy weights on the subject pointed out as crucial, that is, when you asked them about the Nazis, they didn't talk about the content of their ideas so much as about their personalities, the personalities and excuses of their followers, obedience and a lack of connection with oneself and reality, and so on. In comparison to that stuff they all seemed to agree that the "content" of the Nazi ideology was just smoke and mirrors. Even their methods held more content than their content did, if you will. Sure, they needed enemies and a cult of their own supposed superiority, but any details beyond that were subject to change.

Every time I learn about something like Abu Ghraib, I die a little inside. That is, I get diminished a little, and every following day I live on this planet without the perpetrators of those deeds being brought to justice I get diminished some more. That's bad enough, but the way most people don't even notice that is really scary.

Please, don't take this as me snapping at you. I have no way of knowing how exactly you meant what you said, but I am reminded every single day of parallels to Nazi Germany that are perfectly accepted in polite society, so I had to rant a bit.
http://www.space.com/20856-alien-planets-eyeball-earths.html
> it's difficult to constrain the life of the long-lived ultraviolet dwarf stars

What's the upper bound on their estimate for TRAPIST-1's age?
3 Ways DevOps Can Work Faster in the Quest to Accelerate Digital Transformation
The question asks about software and not specifically applications, so the worst software that I have to use are all of the web developer "tools" and frameworks that I have to deal with.

I can write far more performant applications in a fraction of the time without the bloat that is expected in web apps these days, but I would be hard-pressed to find a job where I can do that.
IntelliJ Ultimate user here, writing and refactoring TS works quite well. There are some minor issues (e.g. sometimes it doesn't show the usual "this method is overridden in a child class" indicator), and refactoring likes to randomly modify somearray['foo'] when renaming a someclass.foo property, but I can live with that.
I know this probably comes up each typescript thread, but I still cannot figure out why I should use TS instead of flow + es6, and maintaining the typing definitions always discourages me as it's one more thing that needs to be kept up to date. Am I working on old information here?
Ah, yes. My bad.
There is a maintained fork called notion https://github.com/raboof/notion/

It's not heavily developed, but plenty stable. (actually I have a WIP PR open adding icon support)
> Not according to public research on theoretical designs that have been about for decades.

Which ones? Do you have a link? The only one I remember is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Orion_(nuclear_propuls... but it's more a general idea that a detailed blueprint that only need some money to get built.
I'm quite sick of some of the attitudes I see on HN sometimes around "closed source" like it's some evil thing.

Proprietary software generally leaves society worse off than if that same software were free and open source. In that sense, it is some evil thing.

It's not, people have to eat, have to pay rent, have to support their families

There are plenty of people who think of stripping, porn and prostitution as some evil thing. The argument that strippers, porn actors/actresses and prostitutes need to eat, pay rent, etc. does not detract from that. However, I do not think that there should be laws against porn nor against proprietary software.

I do agree with you that it is much easier to find a job doing proprietary software development. I would be a hypocrite if I suggested that people should not take those jobs. Companies will fund open source if and only if it furthers their business objectives. You are correct in saying that open source projects are, in general, woefully underfunded and the open source company success stories are few and far between.

I would like to think that the "closed source software is evil" crowd is mutually exclusive to the "fawning over SV unicorn" crowd.

Focus on being good at what you do and if that happens in public on GitHub/GitLab/etc then all the better but don't bend over backwards to make your profile look good at the expense of actually knowing your shit.

I agree. If you happen to do good work on GitHub, it can give you a leg up. Any effort poured into making one's profile "look good" is probably better spent actually doing good work or, failing that, studying for those silly data structures & algorithms whiteboard questions.
If you don't mind Java, Effective Java by
Josh Bloch has good API design material. Josh designed collections API in Java
Apple has a lot of practice with large glass panels from their stores.
"Common" knowledge; the brighter the star the faster it burns. Sun-like stars last billions of years, dwarf stars last for trillions, the real giants last for millions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_dwarf
Who organised the original games and provided the infrastructure for them and how much were they paid vs whipped?
There has been lots of contention around this topic. I personally agree with the contrary and Steven Pinkers position. You can see him refute Taleb's claims here:
http://stevenpinker.com/files/comments_on_taleb_by_s_pinker....
Well, dogfooding is always a good idea.
'if you can afford to pay more, you should' is not 'market segmentation'.
I've used bitrise for about the past year as an iOS dev at a fairly small company. I really have no complaints with the service. Super easy to setup and maintain an app on there. Also a ton of integrations (Slack, cocoapods, carthage, hockey app.) Our current setup is pretty simple, primarily creating an archive and posting a link to a slack channel, but we are hoping to start getting some tests running on there soon.
If you are an engineer, you need to take the PE exam. In most states, you cannot take it without a BS degree. Not really comparable to computer science where such things don't really exist.
Can that speed be adjusted to a theoretical value based on latest propulsion systems? What would that be now and how would it likely evolve over then next decades?
To me the delta in price hardly mattered when I looked for how long I kept these systems running.
Woo :) whenever I have to work with an old javascript code base now I always add typings to it first. It makes it orders or magnitude easier to work with and refactor after that.
Changing the subject is not constructive. I listed many names of historians. Did you look at their claims? You seem to have dismissed them entirely based on your preconceptions which, I assume, you learned in school, a time where people are at their most impressionable age.
Honestly that amount of mass seems doable (the hard part being a near perfect fusion engine of course).

Just curious about your calculations though. Did you take into account the fact that you could eject spent helium and therefore lower your mass in transit? Assuming most of the mass is fuel, I would imagine by the time you're arriving there would be very little mass left to decelerate.
We've been using GraphQL for everything since late 2015. All recent code is GraphQL-first, and all old code is proxied by a GraphQL layer in front of it.

Our application helps BigCos to understand if they pay people fairly and to run smart pay reviews. It's a relatively small codebase, ~100k LOC, but it's essential complexity is in managing and connecting dispersed data about employees and markets. GraphQL allows us to represent the natural links within this data, then the app frontends can present whatever business information is helpful in that page/sidebar/widget/card without separate endpoints.

With REST, we had the same problems with every feature: over/under-fetching, can't express relationships well, and can't evolve the schema easily. When we tried to work around these issues (e.g. "v2?fields=a,b,c"), we ended up with a poorly implemented subsection of GraphQL that's not benefiting from Facebook's experience. To compare to the world of databases, I view REST as a Key-Value protocol and GraphQL as an SQL with joins and functions. If all you need is to lookup a document, don't overcomplicate it. But if you need to express relations, you don't want to do that in userland.

The only advantage of REST is using a widely known standard with rich tooling and well-published "best practices" (that just try to work around REST limitations).
I don't think you're familiar with what TypeScript is trying to achieve. It's not supposed to be another language entirely, but a standards-compatible type-safe version.
How many Saturn V rockets have we launched in total?