skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'd have to say my Moto X first generation was the best phone I've ever used. I leave for other phones or break the screen but always go back to it and buy another one used. It is just the perfect size and fast and everything works as it should (except for a few flaws like the headphone jack which craps out after extended use).
Though that kind of performance is probably not going to come about from improvements to chemical rockets but moving to fusion. There are some promising developments on fusion reactors (see Breakthrough in Nuclear Fusion? - Prof. Dennis Whyte https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KkpqA8yG9T4)

Guess something like that with the 100 million C gas doing the propulsion maybe?
The Impact GitHub Is Having on Your Software Career, Right Now…
He has. The US refused to extradite him.
Automated Driving Engineer – Motion Planning – ENG-17-00082
Doesn't energy required to accelerate keep exponentially increasing, though? ke = mv^2
I got you -- The accompanying Nature paper gives a 10 trillion year figure.
Main conversation: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13707547
The (now deleted) comment said:

> I understand the sentiment, but I also understand that if you truly want to get rid of racial bias, gender bias, whatever else bias completely, then not paying it mention in any sphere is how you get there.

I do not see how that is open to interpretation and it appears to run entirely contrary to your point.
And others are spending time with friends, families, taking care of their sick relatives, their kids, going hiking, reading, volunteering, etc.

There's no need to say X is "wasting time" in such an objective tone. For many, spending hours on the weekend doing programming is a waste of time (and it can be, most of the time). For you, it's fun. For others, they just don't have time to do it. No need to judge or expect others to live the same life as you.
Iconly: generate web fonts from SVG icons – 5 free projects and open source
It matters a lot when you are on a very tight budget. I can either get a Kaby Lake i3 for $119.99, or a FX-8320 for $129.99. It's really a no-brainer.

Another way to look at it: instead of putting an extra ~$100 on an i5, which has performance most people don't really take advantage of anyways, you could get a better graphics card.
Automated Driving Engineer – Perception – ENG-17-00055
Michael Okuda has raised the question on his Twitter feed of whether the planets would be close enough to the star that tidal force could be an issue---hard to say at this point (in the sense that they're not loose clouds of rocks, so tidal forces haven't sheared them apart, but I'd assume it's unclear whether they might have interesting geological activity, such as frequent earthquakes or unexpected extra heat due to internal friction).
Do you also dispute the claims in the present article? Or do you just care to dispute the specific method of killing?
It did not, but even if it did, it does not justify the billions spent on reparations by countries including Belgium. It does not justify jailing people for asking questions. It does not justify the precedents set by the Nuremburg show trials. And it sure as hell doesn't justify importing hundreds of thousands of "refugees."
That is exactly what I meant, thank you for the link. I defiantly would support projects like that.
REST describes relationships very well, via hyperlinks. You navigated to this page via a hyperlink. If your API doesn't do that, it's not REST, this is what people usually mean when they point out that an API isn't complying to the REST style.
Avoid vendor locking. Someday in near future if you don't like flow anymore, you can just strip all type annotations with Babel and move on. You are not risking ending up like coffeescript.
Yes, a common modus operandi of Holocaust deniers is to make lists of people who were in some camp but never witnessed any gassing. This is then brought forward as a reason to question the existence of any gas chambers anywhere. It's such a stupid logic fallacy that there isn't even a name for it.
Intel relies more on price discrimination. On the Skylake wikipedia page, I count 30 desktop and 11 server SKUs.

So Intel's "-E" enthusiast line isn't really the optimal price point in terms of generating revenue via volume, it's just the high end of a sliding scale.
If they are tidally locked as reported, then there will be no day, not really. Just as there is no day on the moon.
I'm having a hard time finding more data on the density of matter in interstellar space.

Wikipedia says

> The density of matter in the interstellar medium can vary considerably: the average is around 10^6 particles per m3 but cold molecular clouds can hold 10^8–10^12 per m3 [1]

But I imagine that interstellar gas would be easier to fly through than interstellar sand. Do we know the composition of matter in interstellar space?

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_space#Interstellar_space
I am fairly sure that traffic between nodes is not encrypted; I have dug into this in some detail with GCP staff. if you can quote some sources to the contrary I'd be interested to see them.

(The linked security design doc mentions 'encrypted in transit _to the data center_', but it doesn't address traffic inside the DC, last time I read through it in detail).
Sure! Check this link for the guide: https://github.com/bitrise-io/bitrise#install-and-setup

We are mobile focused at the moment, but a couple of our customers use it to build web projects and we are also building the Bitrise website on Bitrise.
I did, sorry about that.
Like others have pointed out, the combination of the planets being tidally locked so only one side gets sunlight and the strong X-ray radiation and flaring from the host star make it considerably un-Earth-like, and harder for life as we know it to develop.
check his post history. he's commented on threads on three occasions over the past couple of years, and two of those occasions were chiming in with holocaust denial.

Incidentally, the exact same pattern follows with the other holocaust denier in this thread.
Also, you can progressively opt in to add typing information, while still getting most of the benefits without.
It's a nice wrapper on a powerful technique. Could be very useful to some folks - but requiring numpy and pandas is kind of excessive.
End-to-end optimizations for dynamic streaming
Interstellar tramp.
Deciding Our F8
Ordered my copy. :)
> I have no idea how much dilithium crystal would be required though.

Depends on the plot needs for the ~~episode~~ journey.
Firefox tries to download this file
What's magic about it?
Samsung Reveals Four New AR and VR In-House Projects
Absolutely.

That said, the Linux kernel is a helluva lot more attack surface than the relatively few hypercalls provided by most Type 1 hypervisors.
Expect Intel to do a huge price drop if the chip is competitive. In the end few people buy 500+$ chips so this is all just marketing.
Not sure what level you are looking for but Build APIs you won't hate was a great resource to me.

https://www.amazon.com/Build-APIs-You-Wont-Hate/dp/069223269...
>The genius of SpaceX's approach is that they built a landing system where it's OK to be unreliable for a while.

For booster landings it's probably okay to be unreliable forever as long as the failure rate is estimated properly and the value of recovered boosters exceeds the cost of developing and maintaining recovery capability. Since there are no people or cargo involved it's a straight exercise in accounting.
One reason flow might be considered "better" (context is key) is that it plays well with the babel ecosystem, letting one pick and choose their language features.
But what if we are the first and no filter exists at all?
Sure, the CLI supports both Mac and Linux (we plan to support Windows in the future). As our Linux build environments are Ubuntu containers, you should have the best support there (actually on any Debian based distro, auto dependency management is only implemented for `apt` right now for example).
I remember reading about 55 Cancri e (1), another tidally locked planet (2) featured in NASA's Galaxy of Horrors as "The Twilight Zone" (3), where life in the boundary seems unlikely.

1. https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/custom_planets/2

2. https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/resources/149

3. https://exoplanets.nasa.gov/alien-worlds/galaxy-of-horrors
With the last release (2.1) maintaining typing definitions is mostly as optional as Flow, because TS now just assumes imports it cannot find are `any` type.

A lot of typings are now directly inside the NPM packages of the libraries themselves and install "automatically" for you; many other typings can be searched on NPM (primarily the @types/ scope).
Trump Administration Employment Questionnaire
Just going that fast isn't really risky at all (assuming you don't hit anything, which isn't actually a safe assumption). The tough part is making something capable of a constant 1g of acceleration for a 7 year trip. Most of the craft we make only accelerate for the first small percent of a trip. We can do accelerations that high, but not for very long, and we can't even manage acceleration for such a long duration even at a small fraction of 1g.
Trolls who target small players in the hopes of raking in small settlements all over the place are a real evil, to be sure. But from my perspective working on this sort of litigation for a living, the real threat is actually damages in cases involving standard-essential patents, and that's where the troll line starts to blur.

Plaintiffs like CSIRO may not be trolls, per se, but they use the same hired gun damages experts that the trolls do (like Ocean Tomo). The amount of money they seek is completely untenable in the context of standard essential patents, if only because our phones and computers would cost astronomically more money if everyone holding one of the thousands of allegedly standard-essential patents got the kind of money plaintiffs like CSIRO ask for in these cases.

As an aside, patents don't really get "knocked out" in discovery. They get knocked out by defendants filing IPRs, seeking re-exam by the PTO, and occasionally at trial. It's unbelievably rare for a judge to invalidate a patent on summary judgment (which happens post-discovery).
The problem is that you're assuming that all life is equally valuable. That's a flawed assumption, and is not true of people who are simultaneously anti-abortion and pro-execution. To them, unborn fetuses are innocent, whereas convicted criminals are not. So it's wrong to "execute" unborn fetuses, who haven't committed any crimes, whereas convicted criminals aren't innocent at all, and are fair game for execution.
Uh? I think it's widely accepted that our best models of small stars are fairly well understood, and predict that they will continue to fuse hydrogen in their cores for more than a trillion years.
> Because the planets are so close to Trappist-1, they have quite likely become “gravitationally locked” to the star, always with one side of the planets facing the star, much as it is always the same side of Earth’s moon facing Earth.

Also, during the live stream they said that the furthest planet does a complete orbit around the star in 20 Earth days.

So there are likely no 'days' on any of these planets and a 'year' goes by in less than a month on Earth.
See comment above yours, does your point still apply?
Financial cyberthreats in 2016
I think I might be buying this, seems like a good book! Have never heard of it before.
Or cryogenically freeze yourself with instructions to be brought back in a few millennia near the new star system. From the observer's point of view you could be there Tuesday week or so.
And were any of these actually in positions of power to know definitively whether or not extermination programs existed (including ones not at their local camp)?

Also, how about Einsatzgruppen? Are there witnesses claiming they didn't exist either?

edit: Also, what's your response to the Wannsee notes and Posen speeches? Even if hypothetically the gas chambers never did exist, there's clear evidence they very strongly intended to kill all European Jews. Clear intent + 6 million Jews missing + a whole lot of mass graves seems like a pretty cut and dry case, even if you have to resort to saying they were all starved/worked to death and shot instead of gassed.
Am I the only one freaked out by the privacy implications of such advancements?

I mean it's great for the disabled. But if we don't have a good privacy protection legislation, is it possible in the future that you'll be asked for an inspection of your brain?
It's a webp. Firefox doesn't support those.
TRAPPIST-1 on Product Hunt
The comment is probably correct. There is a concept called "the curse of knowledge" which is basically the same issue.
I see your point in the second argument. That said, a Turing complete language, with out os-level checks, is not. For a language thought up to print and display things, it's hard to argue that postscript is as harmless as HTML, for example.
Various probes have gone faster - with the cruising speeds depending whether they headed towards the sun or away. After New Horizons got a gravity boost from Jupiter, it sailed out to pluto at 23k/s and arrived going 15k/s. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/life-unbounded/the-fast...

I'll have to look and see what they have planned for the Mars missions. I'm sure we've jumped ahead a bit in practical engineering terms, but just haven't had a mission to show it yet.
Well that solved some problems (e.g. importing from react-router/lib/*) but autocomplete for TSX is non-functional. Still pretty frustrating considering ES6 works out of the box.
So, who do we call to make sure the newly discovered planets are named Chimay, Orval, Westvleteren, Rochefort, Westmalle, Achel, and La Trappe?
Thats the one I read. It sounds awesome.

Srsly give me 5% of the GDP of the US and I'll put a monkey on Trappist within 5 years. Monkey time.

*Im not being serious, I have no idea how much it would cost or if it would even work.
Continues to be...? Outside of human action, what's the vector?
If Google isn't careful, Microsoft is going to cannibalize their enterprise space. I think Microsoft has been getting the same vibes and it really seems like they are finally trying to be team players and not just catering to the low-hanging fruit of non-tech savvy folk.

I wouldn't be surprised if they take the gamble on releasing a (free?) online enterprise office application suite as some sort of MS Office Lite. Google is no longer the hero of innovation we all thought they once were, and slowly but surely, smaller niche companies and serious tech giants with the singular goal of squashing Google will replace their core products with products that are more open source, privacy-focused, and with real customer support.

I remember when I wanted to work for Google. God, I remember when I wanted to work for Facebook. What the fish was wrong with me.
>The fact that you entertain this thought is an indication that something is not quite right with our field.

Agreed. But try as I might, I can't come up with a solution that I'd actually support the implementation of.

If you have any ideas about we can get from where we are to where we should be, I'd be interested in hearing them. Having IEEE license developers at varying levels of skill sounds like a start, and requiring Internet-visible software to be written by developers with certifications sounds nice...until you think about open source projects, which thrive in large part from free effort. And until you think about the fact that software traverses borders fluidly. And what about entrepreneurship? Should we tell people they can't write apps unless they have the certification? Or that they need to pay an expert to audit their apps?

And the fact that big companies will do whatever they can to cut costs, including hiring developers in countries without certification requirements if you don't motivate them otherwise. (Maybe a DMCA-style safe-harbor, where ONLY if they use a development team with sufficient certifications can they be proof against lawsuits for defects; otherwise people can sue them for exploits that result from their software?)

I have lots of ideas, as you can see above. I just don't like any of them. There probably needs to be a constellation of rules in place, set by a professional organization and ensconced as legal requirements... But half of the rules I imagine wanting I also, under other circumstances, would despise.
Unleash your features gradually
Law Enforcement Using Facebook and Apple to Datamine Trump Protest Arrestees
And there's no better proof of your claim than the two holocaust deniers in this very comment chain - both of them have very old accounts, with some very old comments, and then over a year of utter silence - and then today, they're both all "holocaust never happened".
Code can follow links as well, as long as the semantics doesn't change.

Aside from versioning through mimetypes, which I believe is a really bad idea, I find HATEOAS to be a beautiful concept, although not very useful in practice.

It's a good place to start though. Trying to design for that can help you shape your API properly, just like SOLID or TDD can do for code.
Honestly US defaulting on its debts would come first. Having the same disastrous effect.
TypeScript compiles to JS in a straightforward manner as well. If you wanted to move away from TS, you could simply have the TS compiler compile to ES6 and you're done.
CyberLink PowerDVD Ultra 17.0.1418.60 Final (Patch Keygen) Free Download
The inspections, autocomplete, and auto-import suggestions work great for me, but it doesn't seem to have that "show type on hover" functionality (not even Ctrl+hover, or quick documentation show it), that VSCode and even the online Monaco editor on http://www.typescriptlang.org/play/ have.
Typescript and Babel play well together, too.
I don't think most people doubt the utility of Github, but this writing seems to be from a person living in a bubble.

Most people don't get the time and resources to work on open source. Some times, you can't even open source something, despite wanting to. For example, when I was in academia, I wanted to open source some worthwhile projects I had completed, but was never allowed to by superiors, because they considered them as competitive advantage IP.
The debate rages. The problem is that one side of the planet is essentially exposed to space and thus tends to be at cosmic background temperature, and the other side exposed to the star. It is thought by a lot of people that anything volatile enough to be a gas, ever (so, including water), would rapidly end up migrating over to the frozen side, so even if the planet started with the right mix of water and whatever other volatiles are needed it would shortly not have any in the temperate range. Some have objected that the planet could wobble and periodically unfreeze some of that stuff, and maybe life could exist in a resulting narrow temperate zone. My personal feeling is that it would still far-too-rapidly simply freeze out again, this time out of reach of the wobble, so the parched zone would simply grow to include everything ever touched by the sun rather than forming a stable temperate zone.

But we won't really know until we go look at a planet like this, because we don't have one locally to look at. (Plenty of tidally-locked bodies, plenty of bodies with volatiles and enough energy to keep them moving, I'm pretty sure nothing in the Solar system with both.)
I'm curious to know if you've tried cutting down the customer support questions by offering different availability to different tiers of customers?

I spend a decent chunk of my time on support requests and have thought about this quite a bit. While the number of incoming support requests are evenly split across (1) people interested in purchasing, (2) people who have already purchased, and (3) people who are on our free tier, the latter group ends up having the longest support conversations.

I've thought about setting up an autoresponse that asks people to add their subscription ID to the email for priority service.

I don't know if this would work, backfire, or do nothing, and I'd be interested to know what others have experimented with.
Introducing ng2-materialize for Angular
I don't understand. Are you saying that Pinker claims that violence HAS been declining over time??
Feature parity and market penetration. FP and AVX are middling, no iGPU, fewer PCIe lanes, and they've got keep firm hold of that budget build bracket.

In case you were also wondering why Intel's pricing has been so obscene, it's to do with AMD's underwhelming pre-Zen microarchitectures and having had no serious competition in the past decade until now.
Neat!

OP, how does this compare to scikits.bootstrap [1] feature/performance-wise?

[1] https://scikits.appspot.com/bootstrap
I hope this helps them improve. The lack of decent error messages and support caused me to switch to SparkPost.
I'm not sure this answers your question, but:

I've been working with TS for the past couple of years but now I'm working on a Flow project.

Flow doesn't even compare. It falls short on many things TS would immediately flag, and just feels less thought-out (subjective I know). Tooling support is terrible and while not the language's fault, it means it just doesn't help you as much as it could. Using Flow basically becomes an afterthought, a part of your build step, while with TS it's much easier to have that integrated into your development flow (via your editor of choice).

And honestly, some of the decisions around the language just feel strange. Not knowing what kind of bool to use [0] is pretty emblematic of where it is going as a language.

To me Flow is just half-helping in a way that TS is fully devoted to.

[0] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/40618817/flow-bool-boolea...
That's essentially what blueprint said. You didn't have any trouble figuring out what blueprint was saying, right?
It is often much clearer to use goto than using a wrapper and switching on enum'ed return value to destruct a failed transaction.
All about funding. NASA, for example, is about 35 years behind schedule by my math, solely from funding.

Now whether throwing money at a public agency would have made advancements in lensing, transistor along with propulsion technology happen quicker. Thats a tougher question that leans towards the "unlikely".
My layman's reading of physics-for-layman books has taught me that if we were to travel at the speed of light, we'd convert into energy. However, I'm not so sure about 99.999999% the speed of light. That's really OK, as far as we know?
I think you're using an older definition, wherein "fake news" means unworthy of attention. In recent weeks and months, "fake news" has been used by President Trump and others to mean factually incorrect.

Something being a bad idea or stupid or impractical doesn't make it factually incorrect, i.e., does not make it fake news under the new definition.

The article asserts several facts, among them:

- birds of prey are often already kept near airports to scare birds away from the runway to reduce accidents during takeoff and landing.

- the French air force has an experiment running with 4 eagles to train them to attack small drones, in addition to their normal scarebird duties.

- the French air force thinks the experiment is promising enough to order a second group of 4 eagles.

If those facts are correct, it is not "fake news." It is a silly puff piece about something that is not important, because it will almost certainly never turn into anything beyond an experiment.