skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I tend to just shop at the different stores mostly depending on the main thing I'm going for... one day may be mostly produce at sprouts.. another meat at Basha's... another general groceries at Fry's... another mostly frozen/boxed at WM superstore. I try to keep a few things on hand at all times, and will shop at different stores for mainly the thing they are best at with differing times/days.

I tend not to shop at multiple places on the same day, I just don't care for shopping that much. If you have a good spot for your preferred milk/meat, just get that there, get other stuff elsewhere. There's nothing that says you have to buy everything on the same day/trip.
Ask HN: What is Facebook doing to combat pyramid schemers?
Lately I've been noticing exploitative characters post baits in popular groups. They don't disclose the details of the supposed part time job, but instead invite interested parties to private conversations, where it's easier to swindle the more likely victims. After they're uncovered, they delete the baiting post, part the group and block anyone that's onto them. All the proof of their scheme disappears, and there's nothing to report them for. Even if you can access their profile, they can only be reported for lying about their name, or using a personal profile as a business (which isn't really the case).
There's Netflix for television and Spotify for music, so it's almost inevitable there's going to be a "Netflix for journalism." (Even with competitors offering news supported by advertising for free, it's still a billion dollar market.)

But... why would it be the Times? Incumbents have a poor track record of avoiding disruption by ambitious upstarts.
What is the worst that can happen to a non US citizen, who is not producing the passwords they demand?
Being send back immediately and all belongings seized?
Or only devices they do not get the decryption passwords for?
Detainment for how long?
Being charged with what?
> what is the key to losing weight?

Easy win: No sugary drinks. Juice is as unhealthy as coke. If you want something with flavor, drink tea (without sugar).

For most people, it's to understand this: Carbohydrates make you gain weight. Not the fat in food.

Somewhat hard to implement, but with significant results: Cut sugar entirely from your diet. This automatically results in much healthier eating, because you have to check ingredients on everything this way.
Those coatings, like NeverWet, put down a surface with very tiny spikes. Water has too much surface tension to get down to the base of the spikes and adhere, so it falls off. The problem is that the spike structure is fragile and wears poorly. It's a cute novelty, but until somebody comes up with a tougher version, not very useful.
Which Intel processors have AVX2 disabled?
a good place to start https://www.privacytools.io/
All that's necessary to strip away privacy and civil liberty rights without the slightest resistance is to use pedophiles and terrorists as a scapegoat. After all, who doesn't want to punish pedophiles and terrorists? I don't have the exact quote or reference in front of me, but I believe on numerous occasions lettered agencies have basically said what amounts to "well yeah, but we need to catch pedophiles so we need to see everything everywhere at all times for any reason...remember...pedophiles..." Red herring much? Or take the FBI: "we need to break into any iPhone because ...terrorist!...remember that terrorist! we need his phone! sure, that will implicitly give us ALL phone access...but...terrorism!" Do I need to go on?

Giving up privacy and civil liberties in that sort of light is easier than taking candy from a baby. And it's been going on for decades now in many developed western nations.

overall though, "muh safety and muh security" uttered by plebeians has been justification for abuse of power for thousands of years. thousands.
Another way of saying intermittent fasting works.
Most compilers should be able to handle multi-threaded compiling. I would rather go for more cores than higher frequencies
1.2B people :) 2B population would be unimaginable!
Much of the auto industry is based on buying components like these from one of small group of suppliers. Many are German or Japanese. It has the advantage of making it easier for new comers like Tesla: They can just buy things like wipers from the same companies as everyone else, and focus their engineering efforts on the unique parts.
> most programming languages don’t have an explicit “logical operator” for it

I guess the author never taught of <boolean> != <boolean>. The only thing to be careful with is that it doesn't implicitly convert arguments to boolean, so expressions like "<boolean> != (flags & Flag)" will go wrong without an explicit conversion "bool(flags & Flag)" or equivalent expression like "((flags & Flag) != 0)".

And let's not forget about the friend, ==. I've more than once seen code like "(a && b) || (!a && !b)".

A similar interesting pattern many don't think of is "bool(a1) + ... + bool(aN) == M" (particularly with M==1) and instead we see unreadable monstrosities :)
The solution to the gender gap is to fundamentally change how work is done. I'm glad it was that simple.
That place you get your information from. It stinks.

Look up: Gang of Six affordable care act.

The HCR bill included 6 core planks of previous Republican health care bills, and the Democrats accepted and incorporated 161 amendments to the bill from Republicans.

http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/hcr_amendments/
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2010/02/five_com...
Precisely. The flexibility would be helpful irrespective of gender. It says a lot about our culture (or lack thereof) that we even have this issue to start with.
I wonder how this argument holds up if the government were to make deniable encryption illegal.

If it is possible to determine that you have encrypted data, and it is possible to verify the accuracy of your testimony, there should be no concern about compelling false testimony.

Which is different from compelling testimony that cannot be verified, at least in the sense that you know that only the people being held in contempt could possibly be innocent.

Maybe the tradeoffs that should.be made in this case are different.
My only guess is that when the supply trucks switch their cargo to smaller city worthy delivery trucks the ice cream sits on the asphalt. Whole Foods has it's own semi loading dock, so they don't have to switch the cargo out.
I think what AMD is really trying to do, or what they should do, is place emphasis on the gaming community and drop any/all enterprise related features, and let Intel keep doing that part.
> If a landlord wants to rent their place out to short-term tenants, and tenants want to rent it, and AirBnB want to act as a marketplace, I can't see what the harm is.

It's classic tragedy of the commons. Cities that are great to live in and also very attractive for tourists are obviously great places to rent out an apartment over AirBnB in.

But when half the city does that, then the whole character of the place changes and what was previously great about the city is lost. That is harm.

Luckily, cities have the power to regulate this sort of thing.
"This is irrelevant, it matters what made it into the contract, i.e. Constitution."

This was a correct and useful stance - and a fruitful ground for debate - prior to 2010.

However, what matters now is District of Columbia v. Heller[1] and McDonald v. City of Chicago[2] which "held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states".[2]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Heller

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago
I'm a Zsh user who tried xon.sh for 3 months now and reverted to Zsh just a few days ago. Performance. I easily have ~20 shell instances running (under tmux), and having each one of them run python simply slowed down my computer. I got back to Zsh and while I miss some of xon.sh features (most notable one is calculating things just by typing "1+1"), everything feels so much snappier now.
Heh, I was assuming NelsonMinar was being sarcastic. But yeah -- it's all about the audience. :)
That was a quite good read, thanks!
> Because he's violating a lawful order. If the accused wants to challenge the legality of that order, he can file a lawsuit to do so (and from the article, it sounds like he has). But unless the judge supervising that lawsuit issues a stay on the order in question, the accused is still obliged to comply and can be detained based on his/her refusal to do so.

So here's the thing about that. If he's filed an appeal on a lawful order, he should not have to sit in jail while the appeals process is working its way through. That alone is coercion. That corrupts the legal process. If he has a legitimate claim that the appeals court doesn't immediately throw out, then the lower court is putting pressure on him to not wait for the appeals court's decision by depriving him of my freedom while he waits.

Yes, the appeals court judge could issue a stay on the order. The fact that he/she hasn't indicates to me that the appeals court would prefer to use their own form of coercion and judicial corruption in the hopes that Rawls will just get tired of sitting in jail eventually and comply.

And that's the problem with contempt-of-court. If you can be held indefinitely without being charged with anything, that's a corruption of the legal process. Someone being held in that manner for long enough will likely do anything to get out of that situation, even confess to a crime that carries a sentence of a defined length, because knowing you'll be out in 10 years (or whatever) might be better than being held indefinitely.
Even the Report feature in messenger doesn't cover that situation. Right now I'm able to report someone from a conversation for:

- Sending suspicious links or attachments
- Showing sexually explicit content
- Insults or harassment
- Suicidal behavior (??)
- Not being interesting (???)
It's worthless? So why are telcos are forcing their LTE-U into it then? It doesn't propagate very far? So how come it interferes with weather turbulence sensing and DFS exists?

You basically refuted yourself. As for why not? That was the entire point of my comment: because it radically reduces the channel capacity of existing public wifi systems due to them sensing it and shutting off to not interfere. Paid telco LTE-U with it's proxied to uselessness "internet" without any control or ports is no replacement. It's deployment hurts us all and the only good it does is create more profit for telcos.
I don't see how you arrived at the conclusion that the cardinality of biases is greater than the cardinality of natural numbers from the proposition(s) of the post you replied to. If that was the intent of your post, please elaborate.
Within Europe (ps: as a European citizen) you can go anywhere with a personal identification card (no passport) and there are no border controls (when walking or driving). There isn't even a border, just a sign: welcome to $country (ps: and maybe local driving instructions). Say what you will about the EU, but this has been a great achievement. I can go through airport security between two EU countries and security will just scan my ID and take a picture in an automated booth and I'm good to go (did exactly that several times). It's like 30 seconds to pass the security gate when entering and no personal interaction.

I'm really having difficulty to understand how the United States got from the cradle of freedom (let's say after the civil war, the colonization was not so prestigious) to the capricious and homophobic entity that it is shaping up to be.
Show HN: Is My App Live?
Government accused of 'full-frontal attack' on whistleblowers
> Incumbents have a poor track record of avoiding disruption by ambitious upstarts.

Because journalism is hard. Actual journalism requires boots on the ground, reporters, photographers, contacts in foreign governments, press infrastructure, etc. Netflix and Spotify didn't start out making music, they started out as a delivery platform for it. The NY Times owns the entire integration, from creation to delivery, which puts them in different position than say, music labels for Spotify or movie studios for Netflix.
After much encouragement from others submitting awesome projects, I wanted to put something together that 1. Solved a problem I have pretty frequently with app development and 2. Forced me to learn some new tools outside of my everyday work with iOS/Swift and Node.js. The original use came about after we added a native “A new version is available” prompt in our iOS/Android apps. We control when the prompt shows up from our backend but we had issues where some people on the east coast could update and others elsewhere could not. Turns out the App Store is actually pretty slow at propagating changes so the only way to really know when something is “live” is to check from across the globe.

So yeah, this took about 3 days of work, with the large majority spent spinning up DigitalOcean instances and coming up with a way to reliably deploy the same code base to all of them. I ended up starting with the base Dokku app and a couple bash scripts that setup the initial dependencies of the droplet, another for LetsEncrypt certificates, and finally one that actually deploys from a git repo. The front end is built with Webpack and Vue.js and everything else is running Node.js. Total cost of the deployment with minimum resources is $94 / month. Thats 8 DO droplets (1GB RAM) and two Heroku Hobby apps. If this site actually picks up traction I would probably need to upgrade to the 1x production app on Heroku. I think the 1GB DO droplets should last a while under reasonable load. Any feedback / questions are very appreciated!

You can test WhatsApp's latest release: 310633997 / 2.17.3
Bosch’s Survival Plan
Exactly. It's your constitutional right as a US citizen to tell any Law Enforcement agent to go fuck themselves.

1. They need a warrant to search your phone if you don't voluntary give them access.

2. Even if they have a warrant, you can plead 5th and just not give them the pin.

The American way is all about not trusting the government, believing in conspiracy theories, and stocking up on ammo.
What We’re Fighting For
Surely, indefinite detention is an appropriate punishment for forgetfulness?
One reason i refrain from asking for money for software is that the creators of almost all software i use in my life and 100% of the software i use to create software don't ask for money.
I'm not sure an hour one way or another is really "fundamentally" changing anything. 8-4 or 10-6 vs. 9-5 is pretty normal, actually.
Not sure what you mean by that. Norwegian nationals are covered by U.S. Visa Waiver program, they don't need a visa.
Interesting idea. I just subscribed it. :-)
I think the employer that is able to accommodate a variety of different schedules, and indirectly, challenges that their employees face in their lives, will be a sought-after place to work.

If an employer is trying to attract the best employees, this could be a major competitive advantage. Google can offer superior compensation, but they likely will not be able to offer this due to institutional inertia, people who believe in and are invested in the current system.

No employer, especially a startup, has to follow conventional wisdom on how to run a workplace. They could decide to upend things next week if they wanted to.
Depending on how much you want it, Intel has an E7 that has 24 cores and 48 threads. It can go up to 8 sockets with up to 12 TB of RAM.

I don't even want to know how much such a monster would cost.
A lot of the ZX Spectrum functionality and logic is in the ULA, an ASIC.

There's a whole book on the ULA - http://www.zxdesign.info/book/theZXSpectrumULA.shtml
It's not that effective against clued-up forensics, I'm pretty sure I've read of cases where prosecution successfully detected TC volumes. It does however deal with garden-variety "gun to the head" scenarios.
Just stop claiming innocence and sign this confession and everything will be so much easier!
Thanks so much :D
> it is unnecessarily dense

Underhanded perhaps?
Well if it's encrypted, how will you get a warrant for unknown data. And if you do have proof, then why do you need the data ? In these cases I think the only reliable and best way is to obtain the data by infiltration.

It's a bit like asking a burglar to break in. You either have enough proof, or you catch them in the act.
relevant: the Trump2cash – A stock trading bot powered by Trump tweets https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13613826
Yeah, but the information erasure didn't happen when you applied double negation. It happened when you accepted a surjective convention where 5 mapped to True (and so did every non-zero value). The erasure wasn't accidental---it was a feature of the axiom set you chose. You can't complain that a system of logic is behaving the way you specified it should behave. If you apply --a, you don't lose any information because now you've applied a different axiom set: one that is algebraic and bijective.
Only if you're accused of a crime, right? Which is not the case here. They just want to search your data. Although if you're not a citizen they will probably not let you enter the country.
You know, this sounds absurd, but I like it.
I keep hoping someday I'll be fortunate enough to own a classic CJ or military Jeep with (only) hand-operated wipers mounted at the top of the windshield.

Doors, tops, windshield wiper motors...kids don't know how easy they have it these days.

edit: and I suspect the reason they're pneumatic is because they already have air-powered accessories, so that's one fewer motor to break down.
In fact, it extends farther out than a square form, making it into a bulging square, or something of the like.

We used to have Mercedeses when I was little and I always used to wonder why the inside wiping outline would be round and somewhat M-shaped.

You can kind-of see this in this wonderfully retro polish marketing video: https://youtu.be/XceslAEY2i0?t=69 (watch the lower end of the wiper blade for the outline of the water wiped away).
Improve customer service in general, bring the food court options back to the quality they apparently used to be at. People will pay uprate prices for quality and service. WF has been slipping in these areas and that doesn't match the value for the pricing.

Also, they expanded well beyond what is supported based on their pricing demographic.
I should not like to think anyone mistook me to be arguing in favor of restrictions on cryptography in general, because someone might use it in the commission or furtherance of a crime.

But responding to a case where cryptography is (maybe) used to conceal evidence of possession and/or distribution of child pornography, with, and I paraphrase, "why do we care about this kind of nonsense?", does not advance the cause of encouraging moderate legislation and jurisprudence on this subject.

At the very best, it makes one who advances such an argument look like so completely detached a privacy absolutist as to defend even the vilest of crimes in cases where it might overlap with his pet issue in a potentially negative way.

At only slightly less than the very best, it opens anyone who advances such an argument to allegations of wanting the distribution of child pornography to proceed untrammeled by law, and to those allegations being supported by citation of arguments like 'coldtea's, made in threads like this one.

I get that many here are very theoretically minded sorts, and that, being "systems thinkers", are much happier designing the perfect system of laws and judgment on a clean sheet of paper, rather than dealing with anything so messy as the diversity of politics and opinions which has such a significant impact in reality. I used to be such a person myself. It didn't help me understand a damn thing about the world in which we all actually live, and it made me a pointless nuisance rather than an effective agent in convincing people that even such a hot-button issue as child pornography is not an excuse to abandon all nuance.

I don't demand that my interlocutors, here or elsewhere, develop the same understanding, although I think it'd be a brilliant idea if they did. But I do ask, at minimum, that when they say ill-thought-out and pointlessly absolutist things which tend to make it harder for me to actually convince actual people that at-rest encryption is not dangerous but compelling those accused of criminal activity to divulge encrypted data is, they not act so surprised when I push back on that.
No, because he's also saying that it's already constitutional, and he just wants to add the text to end arguments against him.

It doesn't have to be courageous. But it's not a counterexample to my point that people don't care what the Constitution says -- they only care about their policies and conveniently find that the Constitution allows them.
> I don't think asking for a password that doesn't unlock a device in your possession would pass muster, but unlocking your phone would.

I don't think they can force me to give up my PIN. Not even a court can do that.

My rights as a citizen are indeed less, in that they can detain me in an attempt to force compliance. The thing is that it's never been fully tested. In all the cases I've reviewed, either the person relented or CBP eventually let them through.

If the detention lasted for days, their case would become harder and harder to make. Someone needs to make a stand.

> FYI, I think they have the same right to search you or hold you indefinitely on the way out as well.

Perhaps, but leaving is nowhere near as systematic. More importantly: if they were making giving up this info a condition of entry, I would refuse to enter. If they want to lock me up for that, I have a court case.
There is the theory that Rohr was an aerospace company and didn't know about standards; I find this hard to believe. Some say there was a study about car dynamics. But the article I read said that no one actually remembers. The design docs are in a transportation library in Monterey and they apparently don't say. Here's a collection of theories, all plausible with no confirming evidence:

http://myprogressiverailroading.com/rail_forum/maintenance_o...

BTW, Pittsburg uses 5'6" as well.

DC Metro is even more ridiculous. It's only 1/4" different from standard gauge.
In criminal law, intention matters as much as actions.

I suspect the that deliberately creating a false profile would push you into perjury territory. And in any case, even if the rulings come down otherwise, you'll still get arrested and remanded for a long time while the lawyers sort it out.

Again, though: I am not a lawyer. Consult a lawyer.
ACDSEE ULTIMATE 9.1.580 DOWNLOAD FREE WITH SERIAL KEY
The New York Times 2020 Report
Yeah, that's 99% an issue of almost always an issue of snacking or they're actually not eating as much as you think.
Zero Republican support was baked-into it from the start. Repubs that did work with the democrats, and had their feedback incorporated (161 amendments) were threatened by House leadership (see: Chuck Grassley, Gang of Six).

Obamacare is largely a success. Even the current CBO report shows that it has been working well. The program is only a few years old and needs some tweaking. Its main shortcoming is that it is slightly underfunded, and needs more enrollments from younger people. Also pretty shitty that 19 states would rather see their constituents suffer than to allow the federal government to expand Medicaid for them.
I wonder if we could close it even further if we let the employees control the means of production.
[PRO]
- Detailed Job Description, including:
Company Info + Role Responsibilities + Salary + Benefits

[CON]
- Entry level salary requiring 3+ years of experience