skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's not that great of a leap for the person you are replying to because "Hitler" and his supporters have been called nazis since the summer of 2015 and every comment connected to him inevitably turns into a discussion about neo-Nazis.

It's pretty clear who was being referring to.

concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it

If we really want to get picky it's worth pointing out that the person we aren't mentioning attacks multiple people at the same time and lies about little things all the time.

Said person is a jackass and an authoritarian but to compare him to a regime that killed millions using the loosest historical analogies does them a disservice and muddies the water.
> This realization is also deeply depressing, because it means you're doomed to repeat yourself over and over if you want to persuade people.

Yes. Embrace this.

Patience is a virtue; and not getting angry because the person you've stated something to doesn't get it even the third time you've stated it. I actually find it fun to try and come up with different ways to state things such that people might better understand it.
DOT.COM CRISIS – An event that shook the world
`display:block` does not define layout model of element content so I suspect it is not an intent of the author.

This

div { display:block }
div > * { display:block; }

is closer but still far from ideal: e.g. it will force all tables to lose their display:table; or lists to lose display:list-item;

As far as I understand author is looking for

div { flow:vertical; }

But that's available only in Sciter.
Yeah, you can't really classify a state by any of these dystopias. All states have the elements of all of them and can always shift from one to another. Kind of fluid dystopias.
The Tyranny of Facts: Being “Right” Is Not Enough – Medium
Open to suggestions and discussions
There is no magic silver bullet that will let you upgrade a database without some minor amount of downtime. RDS minimizes this as much as possible by upgrading your standby database, initiating a failover, then creating a new standby. Clients will always be impacted because you have to, by definition, restart your database to be running the new version.

You can select your maintenance window, and you can defer updates as long as you want - nobody will force you to update, unless you check the "auto minor version update" box.

Please don't blame AWS for your lack of understanding of the platform. They try to protect you from yourself, and the default behavior of taking a final snapshot before deleting an instance is in both CloudFormation and the Console. If you choose to override those defaults, don't blame AWS.
That's interesting that the skimmable aspect is most important -- it's true, one does not want to click 10 times to view content one could otherwise "get" from scrolling, but I rather like the idea and I think she or he is onto something here.

I'm working on a UI currently that uses a similar feature, and what you say about being able to skim is something I had not considered much...

How to balance the two? UI flow, and everything-at-a-glimpse.
I'll give up my anonymity when highly toxic partisans don't doxx me and my loved ones for wrongthink.
USB 1.0 came out in 1996 (I recall a special release of Windows 95 had embryonic support for it), so close to 20 years, indeed! The fact you can get the driver to work at all is pretty impressive, given it's not getting updates.
DOes this sound 100% like the Democratic Party to anyone else?
I don't think it's smart to pay to read stuff from a group that also gets money from advertisers. You're either the product or the customer, when in doubt you'll be the product.

Real subscription journalism doesn't do advertising.
Its naturally occurring in the body, and quickly broken down by mono-amine oxidase enzymes (taking MAOI's, mono-amine oxidase inhibitors, with it extends the duration of the trip).
Double life as a KGB agent
Every time people get a realistic economical option, they majority choses to live in their own spacious dwelling. The utopia of crowded cities where people stack on top of each other, just for the sake of walking / biking everywhere, is just that, an utopia.

Self-driving technology will make extreme commutes common. Too expensive to live in Mountain View? No problem, get a nice 3000sqft house in Santa Rosa, hop in the self driving car, handle emails / some tickets, get into the office for the usual team bonding rituals, hop into the car, do some solo coding, then enjoy a quiet evening with the kids.
So, no Android phones is not very pragmatic...
Any justifications?

(Especially without saying to use only FOSS OS)
While some jobs have been replaced over sees, it seems like more have been replaced by gradual automation.

https://www.ft.com/content/dec677c0-b7e6-11e6-ba85-95d1533d9...
Don't blame AWS because you don't understand what ephemeral storage is.

There is a significant security reason why they blank the ephemeral storage. How would you feel if a competitor got the same physical server as you, and was able to read all of your data? AWS takes great lengths to protect customer data privacy in a shared, multi-tenant environment. They are very public through their documentation about how this works, so I think it's a bit negligent to blame them because you don't understand the platform.
dont use android?? copperheados?? hello? sure sounds bias to me. and no u wouldnt use gmail, u would use something non fourteen eyes. like protonmail or ur own pgp enigmal with riseup. u wouldnt even use social media. this is ridicules. whatsapp? really? after all the extreme crap they got caught with? how about u advise signal, silence, or xmpp options out there.

chromebook?...tails...whonix....librem 15.... qubesos... lets get real here...
He has a different opinion from you, what's so hard to understand?
Hence the advice to only do this on machines where you have physical access, or at least can trigger a PXE boot via IPMI.
Political Networking (how social networking is changing politics forever)
Forget Autonomous Cars - Autonomous Ships Are Almost Here
in reality there area bajillion sides. it's just an easy construct that people will understand at least two of those.
RDS snapshots are backups. They are copied to S3 storage, which is replicated across 3 datacenters within a region.
The existence of contrary hallucinations does not imply that all hallucinations are contrary.
I read somewhere (erowid perhaps?) that a dissociatives are very dangerous precisely because it's very hard to tell which things are real.and which aren't so people get hurt trying to escape from these very real images.

Scary as fuck...
I don't implicitly trust the news since the time I was a kid: I grew up in USSR and there was a saying that the only truth in the Soviet newspapers is the typos.

Anyway, there are many good articles on the art of reading news in the time of news wars. The better ones I like:

https://news.vice.com/article/how-to-cut-through-the-bullshi...

http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/the-art-of-close-readi... (and then other parts)
People can do mental labor. Horses can't. Automation can't.
While we are excited we got the grant I kinda agree. Our stuff like the whitepaper (https://storj.io/storj.pdf) or KFS (http://blog.storj.io/post/150825969108/introducing-kfs-a-loc...), allowing you to scale LevelDB past 100GB, are way cooler and more relevant to Hacker News.
This 'cleverness budget' is a fantastic term. Thank you!
How humans could evolve to survive car crashes
There is nothing "so-called" about the administration;

The moment when the "administration", via its spokesperson, Donald Trump (speaking for President Bannon) referred to Judge Robart as a "so-called judge" -- which I hope you understand was absolutely not meant as a joke -- is the precise moment when its constitutional legitimacy ended; and at which, it in effect, declared itself a dictatorship. Or that is to say, as "ridiculous, and [to be] overturned".

The American people are responsible for all that happens and if they think it's problematic, there is plenty they can do about it right now.

Like take to the streets -- and if necessary, physically block every immoral and unconstitutional act this regime intends to perpetrate -- until it collapses, and goes into exile. As people have been forced to do in Ukraine, Romania, the Philippines, the GDR, and countless other countries against kleptocratic dictatorships everywhere, in the modern era.
why? let's complain!
Parse the wording of the statement(s) in question. Look for lapses existing between the actual language of a message and it's intended result. Wordsmith's are expert at saying nothing substantial while allowing(encouraging) the audience to perceive or project their biases to said message.
Yes, that was an interesting experiment.

But I'm arguing that publishers could simply sell per-article access. As an alternative to subscriptions. I used the current ad-brokerage system as an example, because it's so hugely cumbersome. But I'm not arguing that users should simply bid against advertisers.
A point i'm always surprised is not discussed much in the basic income debate is loss of control.

Whenever a job is performed by a person, that person has the power to refuse doing the job or put their own spin on it. The effect is that there some basic checks of ethics. This keeps businesses from doing things blatantly against the interests of society and ensures that CEOs with grand visions of shaping humanity are forced to discuss their ideas with others before implementing them.

All that is not true if a major part of society is not part of the work process. In the extreme, that could make the old "bond villain with robot army" scenario actually credible. But more realistically, it could lead to large and important aspects of society being under unchecked control by a relatively small number of people. This is already true today with communication and data collection (e.g. google/apple/etc can push arbitrary updates to billions of phones around the world without any sort of oversight) and it will likely be the same with transport and manufacturing in the future.

I fear basic income not only doesn't address this problem but even worsens it by declaring it normal that a large part of society does not take part at all in shaping that society.
An Update on ES6 Modules in Node.js
The security situation on Android is, full-stop, a tire fire. Be it the existence (at all) of external storage that badly-considered applications happily write sensitive stuff to (and for a journalist, your photos are sensitive) to the general mess that is Android application permissions (even in newer versions) to the slapdash, inconsistent way that updates get pushed to devices. It's all bad, and if you care about security, you should not use Android, no exceptions.

As it happens, I use an Android phone as a daily driver. But I'm not a journalist and I'm not handling data that isn't sensitive to anyone but myself. I'm willing to take that risk (edit: and I'm able to, to a level I'm comfortable with, mitigate those risks, which a non-technical person probably can't evaluate safely, to say nothing of implement). But I'm not a journalist whose sources may depend on me.
An interesting and thorough categorization, but I take issue with the defeatism inherent in the concept.

When the author says "I would like to suggest that all modern societies are both Kafkaesque and Phildickian with either a Huxleyan or Orwellian overarching framework; modern, western, capitalist societies tend to be basically Huxleyan (HKP) and pre-modern, eastern, communist countries tend to be basically Orwellian (OKP)," that is a premature conclusion, and one that should be challenged.

Yes, many societies have aspects of various kinds of dystopias. Does that mean all those societies are dystopias, or that all technology which may enable certain kinds of dystopia is inherently bad? Further, are all forms of life which involve being an active participant in one's society or culture so necessarily just a way of explaining away one's participation in a dystopia?

When we start categorizing the United States, for instance, as Phildickian-Huxlian-etc., we're doing so without answering the bigger question: Is the modern US a dystopia? Why or why not? If not, is it becoming more like one, and if that is so, what can we do to stop it?

I think the author is using the term "dystopia" to describe "flawed modern societies," which is not really what it means. I'd be curious to know what the author thinks an ideal human life ought to look like.
Again, you're confusing popularity with being technically antiquated or obsolete.

The thesis presented in the article is that POSIX is outdated. The popularity of a platform, particularly one which was forced upon the world through a de-facto monopoly, is entirely irrelevant in any argument on the technical merits of a technical standard, particularly when some of those platforms were designed with the express purpose of locking out virtually all standardized programming languages.
Mixing Specflow with Behaviours Design Pattern
EZ CD Audio Converter 5.2 Crack 2017 with Serial Key Free Download
> The author says that smart, successful people are cursed with over-confidence due to them knowing one thing very well. But how can you call a person smart if they do not even possess the ability to properly self-reflect. Is that not the one thing that should define smartness?

I've more often heard the opposite stated, that people who are smart have a tendency to see multiple sides of every issue and struggle to come to decisions, whereas people who are less smart are more prone to see complex things in black and white. If only we had a readily available example of that phenomenon...
I agree it's overly broad statement without justification, but it's not entirely unfounded either. iOS's extreme walled garden does protect you from many things that Android doesn't. As another commenter mentioned, security permissions are a mess, malware is a real thing, and the power and versatility of Android leaves you very vulnerable if you're in a high risk profession who must keep secrets safe.
That's... kinda how leaks work.

Or would you have denounced the Deep Throat leaks that lead to Nixon's downfall as just "unconfirmed rumours"?
I love the high quality high res photos in this article! They take a while to load, but so much better than low res photos full of artefacts you usually get in articles, here you can actually see something
1. Admission. "I did it" is one way. (Thinking of caught on camera) - after admission often the search for truth stops.

As an aside one strong component of a couples ability to coexist is just this: how do they interpret relative truths. And how do they gain input for truth moments.
Every mental task can be reduced to putting 0's and 1's in the right order. However, reducing the tasks to this point isn't really helpful in the discussion. You pretty quickly arrive at a mind bending number of ways to order 0's and 1's, or "legos".
> Do you have any cites?

Joe Biden says the:"Liberal international order is at risk."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_-iFOwxh20

Also

"French Ambassador to the U.S. Gerard Araud foretold of a new world order. "After Brexit and this election, everything from now on is possible," Araud tweeted. "A world is collapsing before our eyes. Vertigo."

"It's the end of an era, that of neoliberalism. What will succeed it, is yet to be known," Araud said in another tweet. Both tweets were later deleted."
http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/2016-election-day/world-rea...

All of these people recognize that the post WWII world order is failing. There was no "end of history." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_End_of_History_and_the_Las...

> What countries really want to engage in war and disrupt the global economy?

Humans are passionate animals. We will wage war for ideology. We always have. And while some will lose [economically] others will profit. War is big business.
again copperheados... this guide has many bad directions
My grandparent's house nearby Berlin is close to 3000 sq ft. They only built it this large to rent out the second floor.

No garage, a carport is enough for the few times a year someone needs to park a car there.

Bus stops every 90 minutes, so not exactly amazing, but good enough for the occasional trip to the city.

Note that bus service doesn't need lots of tax money to build up infrastructure, so it can be built out into even sparsely populated areas.
Really dig what you have going on here. Very creative.
You are correct. In fact the distinction between your two examples i.e the car (a tangible good) and the program (an intangible good) is what economists refer to as rivalry [0].

A car is a rivalrous good. A program is a non-rivalrous good.

The main distinction is that the marginal cost of producing a non-rivalrous good is zero.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivalry_(economics)
You should use "web" link under the article. The traffic coming from the search is not pay-walled.
WSJ + WaPo is great IMO. My morning routine is WSJ, FT, WaPo, and sometimes NYT. The NYT is my least favored source partly because they skew too heavily toward my biases and I prefer reading high quality news from alternative perspectives more. YMMV.
Get Superhuman Abilities with Biohacking
> south korea recently dumped their government via swarming the streets with millions of people until their demands were met. a similar strategy is unlikely to be executed in the US, however. the public

What about the recent Women's Marches in dozens of cities across the country?

What about the similar protests against, and efforts to stop the recent governmental overreach against immigrants?

Heck, what about the massive anti-establishment grassroots movements (like the Tea Party) that largely contributed to the rise of the current "right" and our current President?

I agree they're not as effective as the South Korean protest, but they are also smaller as a percentage of the population. It's inane to suggest that they had no impact, though.
A clear statement of what you're going to do, some constraints on the design a la Design-by-Contract, and languages/libraries that mitigate errors by design are so easy to do that small shops do them on a regular basis. Ada/SPARK, Eiffel, Ocaml, and Haskell are examples with steady business in industry with last three used on relatively-fast-moving projects. Add in static analysis, spec-based generation of tests, and/or fuzzers to get lots of reliability for free. Guess what? This method also scales excellently if the company has access to a huge pile of servers and engineers whose build system can automate all the checks with every submitted change.

Your idea that it has to be as ridiculous as process junkies is a strawman. A strawman that happens in a lot of places for sure but doesn't have to. Google can just take the few, easy-to-apply practices from high-integrity systems to get tons of benefit. It's the 80/20 rule for increasing assurance.
Most drivers on country backroads where I live (Cotswolds, UK) are safe and respectful. The dangerous places are provincial towns/cities - worked and cycled in a large Staffordshire town for six years, it was horrid - and rural A roads, but any decent cycle route planner (ie not GMaps) will keep you off the latter for the most part.
Societies living under rule of any state are inherently dystopias.
Unconvincing argument. The court's statement, as I reproduced above, is not about the specifics of the statute, otherwise it would have said "it's theft, just not physical removal". The wording is very clear.

The example of the other case (which, by the way, was only a District Court decision) also seems weak. AFAIK (IANAL), the fact that copyright law preempted state law doesn't mean the two are equal, it just means that both theft and copyright infringement occurred - which is easily seen to be the case, since physical plans were actually removed from a place.
Thanks, but that's not a renderer, just a wrapper around the Google Maps widget. You may want to look into Leaflet since you're apparently not familiar with it.
Thanks for the reply.

> It is not our intent to have one of our team members implicated by the transparency. That is why we redacted their name to team-member-1 and in any future incidents we'll do the same.

Great, good to know. I wish all the success in the world to you and everyone involved with Gitlab.
Now for this, you would need to take random couples from the whole population (so you'll need almost 4 billion cars for the first round), let them have sex in the car, then crash the car. You'd repeat with the survivors.

I'd guess you'd get promising results quickly enough, half a dozen generation or something.

And an interesting side effect would be that you'd solve the hunger and "human-made warming" in the world at the same time.
As far as Android goes: who's auditing CopperheadOS? What white hats are looking at it and trying to compromise it so that it can be improved? What's their rep, what's their record, and how do they stack up against iOS's internal and external security tests?

As far as "ur own pgp enigmal with riseup" goes: how are you going to get people to email you? Are you, a journalist, going to manage SPF/DKIM and make sure you're doing it right? How are you going to manage antispam? Gmail is not perfect--but unless the totality of your threat model includes getting black-bagged because an NSL found encrypted emails in your inbox, it is probably the best option. (Protonmail is fine too, but increases friction--and increased friction increases the likelihood that you're not going to use it, falling back to easier tools.)

WhatsApp: either that or Signal are fine (and, indeed, run the same protocol!). XMPP relies largely on federation, which relies on federated servers not being compromised, so no, that's out. (I haven't looked at Silence, can't speak to it.)

Chromebooks are a decent option for some use cases, unless (as more and more journalists tend to do) you need something that can easily and effectively edit audio and video. Tails/Whonix/especially-Qubes are not because people need their stuff to actually work and to not spend more of their time fighting their computer than doing their jobs; to that end, a properly patched OS X is a pretty reasonable call.

"Getting real here" means finding a workable place on the do-your-job/security curve, and most of what you're saying is not. For example, of course you would "use social media", because that's a large part of the job of a journalist in 2017. Your recommendations, while (I assume) in good faith, indicate a willingness to invest more time in fighting your stuff than doing your job. Nobody else cares. Recommend what's easy and what gets 95% of the way there (and not, as with something like CopperheadOS, actually detracts).
This is FAKE NEWS! Disney Cruise Line is not owned by Carnival, but rather by Walt Disney Parks & Resorts.
you can always connect an external screen and go from there
I have 70 and I find the methods to organize them pretty much meh.

I have like 10 categories, but as I'm only actively playing (i.e. have installed) like 5, the rest is still a collapsed bunch of categories...
You see exploitation, I see a market signal to high schoolers and undergraduates telling them we have enough graduate-level geographers, encouraging them to pursue something else and eventually making us all more prosperous in the future.