skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
As in, like filling a pool, to float the dog to the surface?
Approximately zero people will ever need to answer questions like "if I drive t^2 miles per hour for k minutes, how far did I go?"
Mocket is alive and is fighting with us
Everything except the mechanisms to detect voting rings and such.
If you want archiving, store "plain text" mail on an encrypted disk/along with your other encrypted backup?

You will need to archive the public and private keys if you need to go back and audit messages - but that assumes that "I verified to my satisfaction in 1996 and archived securely" isn't enough.
TIL my Magic: the Gathering forum for combo decks is a terrorism board. Guess we probably should stop naming decks Blitzkrieg and Spanish Inquisition.
Very large companies, mostly banks, retailers and telecom. Some industrial IoT and a couple governments.
> … is not in itself any less secure … takes usability more seriously than security.

You're contradicting yourself. If it's not any less secure, then how does using it mean you're not taking security securely? And you're also treating usability as if it's not important, when in fact usability is very nearly the most important part. If your software isn't usable, then nobody will use it, and if nobody is using it then it doesn't matter how secure it is.
To be fair, the Quebec terrorist would have been caught on a couple of these items, but not all. Yes, this questionnaire would catch radical islamic terrorists but not the right-wing terrorist you mention, so it is only effective for a class of such possibly violent individuals.
I agree that the older, retrofitted bathrooms are indeed horrible designs. However, I completely disagree that newer bathroom designs are "sane". I have seen very, very few "sane" public bathrooms; usually they're just in fancy restaurants where they don't use the standard metal partitions, and instead spend a lot of money on real walls and tile and wooden doors.

As far as I'm concerned, any public bathroom where the partitions between stalls have any gap at all (especially about 12 inches as they usually are) are not sane. There is no reason for that gap; it's just creepy.
Definitely, it's super weak but at the same time constructive. The issue is that it essentially ends up becoming a search algorithm where contradiction is backtracking. If the search algorithm doesn't stumble upon the solution (at least in principle) in finite time then it's a bit tough to consider it constructive.
Another side story is that the girls condition was caused by her mother breathing a pesticide . The mother was probably an immigrant her self that we want to throw over a wall. Also if breathing this pesticide caused this how can it be safe to eat?
2017 Dodge Challenger Mopar 80th Anniversary – Exterior, Interior Walkaround
Verdigris | Mountain View, CA

Looking for:
* Solutions Architect (Full time)

Apply here: https://vdgr.is/2ldehLU

As a Solution Architect at Verdigris, you're part sales, part implementation engineer. As an early member of a startup company, your responsibilities are broad. Customers will lean on your expertise. You will translate their requirements into a sensible Verdigris deployment scope. From nurturing customer prospects to coordinating installations and verifying equipment commissioning, you’ll work with growth and customer operations colleagues to deliver a seamless, scalable customer setup experience.

At Verdigris, we organize ourselves as small agile teams between 3 and 8 people. The Growth team drives customer acquisition, revenue growth and platform deployment. The Customer team delivers insights and helps customers get more value. Your teammates are cross-functional. We have diverse and deep experience in sales, marketing, business development, product marketing, account management, data science and building systems engineering. We’re searching for the right teammate to share our collaborative focus.

You can find more information about us at verdigris.co
I'd second this!

First time I bought some from Costco, my family asked why my food was so delicious. It's not even much more expensive than regular butter.
Not conclusively, no.
"Subscribe to read" :(
Well, besides the big testing of compiling an entire linux distribution, yes, it is good to have specific tests for some particular issues in the compiler (manageable pass/fail tests that can identify a problem quickly)
It's even worse when it's a sticky header. In those cases when you hit the "Page Down" key the content is covered by the header and you have to press "Up" a few times to read it.
I assume you trust logic and empirical tests. Here's something that is both repeatable, and as empirical as it gets. Consider every instance of knowing anything "objectively". You will notice that consistently it is always first and foremost a subjective experience. You can't get around it. Thought is very quick to dissect, categorise, extrapolate etc. and then you create a division of the thinker, which you take to be yourself, and the things "out there" which are separate from you. You take your understanding of the world as absolute truth, while spiritual giants, dared to dig much deeper in a manner no less scientific than the greatest scientists the west has known, only directed it inwards instead of outwards and arrived at understandings which are no less remarkable than what scientists have. The difference is that they can't demonstrate it by getting a rover to mars, but by becoming totally free of any form of suffering caused by an incorrect understanding of reality, which I dare say is at least as impressive.
Those people did exist, but were largely ignored because the medical bureaucracy and Federal government got into the food pyramid and dietary guidelines business.

The real money for the food industry then became pursuing the low-fat diet.
Ironically putting butter in coffee is a thing now...in keto/paleo diets especially: http://www.thekitchn.com/whats-the-deal-with-butter-in-coffe...
The sugar industry has been doing this for about as long as the tobacco industry. They've been using their influence to poison nutrition science for decades and steer modern dental practices.

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/09/13/well/eat/how-the-sugar-in...

http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/jou...
Checked out my local ( Manhattan ) group. One of the first events:

"Find ways to ensure that Democrats are voted out of Congress

Historically, Democratic politicians have been against the Second Amendment and other vital rights. Mayors in NYC and other large cities, in addition, are supporting what goes on in Congress when these restrictive practices are enacted. We should do what we can to assist the new president in combating individuals who spend their time working against the Constitution."

So... this is going about as well as I expected a political meetup group with no leadership to go.
Why do people have to quote fake news like it's an invented problem? I guess there could be some disagreement on the scope of the problem, but there's inevitably a better-trained person in this world who will be researching and becoming a subject matter expert on this in the coming years on it's effects and breadth.
It's still pretty clear you don't get his ideas, let me help:

"Even experts can't predict everything, so we should build failure tolerance into our systems..."

That's not really NNT's point at all. We shouldn't even design systems that require fragile predicting systems of any kind. We shouldn't waste our time. We shouldn't be designing fragile top down inductive systems in the first place. Ever. Like centralized banks for instance. They are inherently flawed because they don't account for unknown unknowns. And any benefits are epiphenomenal (i.e. fitting the story to the facts narratively after the fact).

"Experts sometimes get things wrong, so your guess is as good as theirs..."

Also not really an NNT idea. He states that some kinds of knowledge (like experience, i.e. empirical phenomenology) are more resilient and less subject to exposure to reality then say top down theoretical knowledge like economics (which is his dead horse to beat but he has a point: there is no such thing as non-theoretical economics for the most part since they rely on homo economicus etc etc etc)

"Experts are actively hazardous and should be rejected because they are experts"

Man, you have a gift I'l give you that. NNT says you should ignore so called charlatans like economists and academics because their knowledge is not tested in the real world and never exposed to the cold light of empirical reality, having been coddled by the university tenure system and the incestuous system of paper writing and publishing. A plumbers knowledge is tested every day when he fixes pipes, an engineer's is tested in his products. An economists are not really tested since we have no way of actually replicating the universe and testing out their little toy ideas. There will always be exigent data we don't have. Hey, theres the problem of induction again!

"...induction...freshman...sun....useless..."

You conflate the word deduction in the same breath as induction so I'll help you out. Induction = using specific events to determine the general theory. Deduction = using general theory to explain specific events. Understanding why induction is a PROBLEM is the whole point. No you can't apply the problem of induction deductively because that is the literally the definition of the problem of induction: recursive. It isn't a deductive theory to be applied to knowledge to reject it, it is the core problem of human knowledge, which is constantly seeking a heuristic or a pattern where there might not necessarily be one. Induction is a trap. You keep falling into it.

"All knowledge is limited and provisional; use it anyway...the lack of firm surety still seems to disturb some people..pseudo expert"

Reflect on above ideas about big fragile systems, charlatans, and induction. Also consider that there is nothing inherently wrong with promoting any ideas (in a Popperian manner) and accusing someone of "preying" for simply sharing ideas is again ad hominem and fundamentally fallacious. Understand and attack the ideas not the person.

Go read and understand Karl Popper and empirical negativism and this whole thing might make more sense and NNT might annoy you a little bit less.
Unlike in e.g. the UK, where the Official Secrets Act applies to the population at large, the prohibition against leaking or unauthorized possession of classified information is exclusively applicable to people with clearances.

Think of a Security Clearance as a scoped waiver of free speech in return for access to sensitive information. In the US, you have to opt-in to restrictions on your freedom of speech. Anyone without a clearance is protected by the 1st amendment, which has no National Security exception.
or mythbusters style fill with ping pong balls. Probably both bad ideas.
the judiciary is bound by precedent, and there are 5-4 conservative Supreme Court rulings from the 80s to the early 2000s that cemented the status quo into place.

With Trump/Pence as POTUS the judiciary will be hamstrung for years barring a truly massive public groundswell behind reversing some of those decisions - if that happened, you might see a single judge flip. Whether that's enough depends on who dies before 2021.
Individually I charge several orders of magnitude greater than what you're quoting. I'll advise and design, do deep troubleshooting etc.. Consultants that work for me (I'm the CEO) or a large SI will do the implementation.
cite? first I've heard of it.
You can't say, "don't worry about it", but there are other factors at various times there have been lots of other hazards, from cribs to bedding to pillows and a hundred other things. Laying on the tummy was also recommended at one point.

Of course, it's impossible not to say "what if". I hope your mom finds peace.
Well I tend to think they also have deeper pockets and are more concerned with public perception than phone and mail are. Some of it has to do with the fact people don't see them as indispensable so they have to not be to belligerent standing up for themselves.
because they are crazy trump supporters.
Most blood tests or tests for any major disease have a high rate of false positive, that's why you take the tests ALONG with a doctor analysing your symptoms (and that's there Bayes' theorem plays a big role).

So applying a single test to a huge general population makes little sense. But applying that to a population that already carries some traits is highly relevant.
My sister worked in an ICU ward for babies as a nurse and she would often cry for days after one of the babies died. Shortly after me and my partner had a son my sister decided to quit her job because she felt even more attached to the babies. She couldn't bear it more.

Just saying this because it must be horrifying to watch your kids die again and again. I guess this man finds solace in the fact that he is making their short lives much better. My respects.
I remember all the talk about "carb loading" for athletes and how many people decided "If atheletes do it, I should do it too."
The presentation "World Wide Web, not Wealthy Western Web" describes the effects of the bloated web around the world: https://vimeo.com/194968584
Debian 8 supports http/2 with the updated nginx provided in jessie-backports.
An enemy combatants gets no such treatment. Since we're in a war against terrorism (the state's words, not mine), the legalese has mainly been argued from that distinction.

In an ideal world, it takes a crime to make a criminal. The consequences of commiting a crime are enough to keep most people from committing them. But if your crime involves suicide, what earthly consequence can we invent to reduce the numbers? I'm sure it would be helpful if whatever factors that are developing the perceived rewards of killing a bunch of people could be routed, but other than that, our thinking on the justice system doesn't really net a solution to politically motivated murder suicide. I.e. is this precrime? Under the western ideal of innocent until proven guilty, yes. Do the incentives of that system overcome terrorism? No.
Fundamentalism, tactical training and a keep interest in prior attacks is a red flag on its own. I don't think that encryption adds anything.
I think what is meant is, if you combine a first name and a last name, you can't break the full name back into first and last name. Because people have names with spaces in them, among other problems.
... which conclusion would mean that you'd have to ignore everything I said after "Additionally".
I'd be careful using the term "create energy" and instead opt for "generate energy."
I was referring to the "hit the ground running" phrase, not jquery. Just because I know jquery and they use jquery does not mean someone can hit the ground running, there could be a lot of spaghetti code to untangle.
Servers running javascript are called "a dumb idea". But that's neither here nor there - The core idea of "Serverless" is that you don't have stateful physical machines that you manage, only a series of processes - which can live just about anywhere, with only clearly defined interfaces to shared state.
Actually, a surprisingly large amount of terrorists do not use encryption (or at least not on purpose.) For a recent example, after news media widely reported that the Paris attackers used encryption, it turned out that they actually did not [0], and instead simply used common messaging apps. That didn't stop the FBI from using the attacks to denounce encryption, of course.

In reality, using encryption isn't going to help you all that much if a government entity thinks you're suspicious. It may make it marginally harder for them to be suspicious of you, but that's about it. If they want something, and 'encryption' is in the way, 99.9% of the time they have a way around it. A very relevant, and very hilarious article on this: [1]

[0] http://bgr.com/2016/03/22/paris-attacks-iphone-encryption/

[1] https://www.usenix.org/system/files/1401_08-12_mickens.pdf
Many of these scripts actually install through package managers, dockers curl | sh like a year or two ago basically just set up an apt repo and ran some apt commands. I think the hurdle they're gunning for is having X number of distro targets and the explanation cost for a user that just wants to jump in.

At least, that's how I've read it to be.
Apple actually did do voice authentication back on Mac OS 9. See http://www.gcsf.com/extras/mwj/mos9special/ (figure ten).

I assume they dropped it because it wasn't actually secure, I remember my brother getting past mine once with only a couple of tries.

Presumably we could do better today, but as far as biometrics go, I'd put my money on Windows Hello's facial recognition over voice showing up again. Apparently they've done a better job of it than the Android handsets a couple years ago managed.
I had that thought as well, however when you look at the differences of the two systems I don't think it holds up well. Consider that every other tested source mentioned has a natural diluting mechanism, whether it is a river receiving runoff rainwater or a tidal area. The trench on the other hand represents a global minimum. Nothing really comes "up" from the trench in quantity so it is in some ways a perfect 'sink'. As such it may be in the process of simply getting more and more concentrated.
There chemical inertness would make them extremely long lived under the conditions of the trench.
http://www.geography.learnontheinternet.co.uk/topics/river_e...:

"Rivers erode in four ways:

Abrasion or corrasion - This is when large pieces of bedload material wear away the river banks and bed.

Attrition - This is when the bed load itself is eroded when sediment particles knock against the bed or each other and break, becoming more rounded and smaller.

Hydraulic Action - This is when the force of water erodes softer rock.

Solution or corrosion - This is when acidic water erodes rock."

So, there will be larger pieces of rock intake water that hit the bank of the spillway, slowly destroying it.

When engineering the spillway, you have to take that into account.

That means we have to accept that it will need repairs after use, just as a fire extinguisher needs it after use.
I read it and I believe your interpretation is false.

It DOES NOT allow minority religions in while excluding the rest.

It does instructs the applicable departments to simply prioritize people facing religious persecution. Prioritizing people through the safety checks and paperwork who are at the most risk should be the EXACT purpose of a refugee program with a humanitarian basis to it.
47 Centigrade = 116.6 Fahrenheit. Sounds comparable to summer temps in Phoenix and Tucson, but they're probably not used to it.
I'm not sure why you're being down-voted here. This a legitimate case of the problem of induction, "the glory of science and the scandal of philosophy" [1]. That said, it seems like the flaw in your reasoning (and ch4s3's) is the lack of an objective standard. Holding sincere beliefs and referring to oneself as a Christian don't in themselves make a person a Christian. For example, suppose you met a person who said "I'm a Christian. I don't believe in God and I think the Bible is fiction." Instead of "well ok, he's very sincere, he just doesn't follow the scriptures literally", I think we would rightly conclude "despite his sincere beliefs and identity claim, this person is not a Christian." That is, his identity claim is false. In order for a person's Christian identity claim to be true, he must hold and practice true (or approximately true) beliefs about the person, work, and teaching of Christ.

So doesn't this deteriorate into a "no true Scotsman" argument? I don't think so. The hallmark of the "no true Scotsman" fallacy is its ad hocness [2]. Otherwise, no taxonomy of any kind would be possible. But surely it isn't ad hoc to say "Christians follow Christ's teachings, and non-Christians don't." So what are Christ's teachings? That can only be adjudicated by examining scripture to find out what Jesus said. Some statements (e.g. "you shall love your neighbor as yourself") are pretty straightforward. Some are less so. But we shouldn't take the fact that people disagree about some of the interpretations to mean that Jesus had no meaning, or that his meaning in unknowable. Rather, this should prompt us to ask "what are your reasons for thinking that's what Jesus meant?".

Getting back to your question, we're inductive creatures, and to an extent I don't think you can (or should) avoid drawing generic conclusions about cultures as a whole, given a large enough sample. But make sure that you're sampling persons whom you believe to be actual Christians, and not merely nominal Christians. For comparison, here are a couple of Jesus's metrics: "by this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another" [3] and "if you love me, you will keep my commandments" [4].

Sources:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Problem_of_induction
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
3. John 13:35
4. John 14:15
Show HN: Elixir wrapper for Shards with extra fluent and Elixir-like functions
A practical implementation of this would probably want to do a couple things:

1. As you mention, make sure they can't overwrite files

2. Have a content type whitelist on the requestUploadURL function

3. Maybe authentication to keep track of who is submitting these requests?

Assuming that you're okay allowing someone to upload files with a given content-type to your bucket is there anything I'm missing?
That's impressive gerrymandering of the text to reach that conclusion. Try and zoom out a little bit (I know, terribly mixed metaphors).
Actually, I think the code that's on github is quite old. This repo hasn't been updated in 2 years, and I know they've made changes to functionality beyond just the admin/detection features you describe above. I don't know how much different the code is now, but I'm pretty sure what's publicly available is not up to date.
Interesting question; I did not think anyone would interpret my quote of JK in the way you seem to have. But yours is certainly a valid possible interpretation, though not the right one, IMO.

To make it clear: I do not think he meant it at all in the way you think - your interpretation is something like the burning of the Library of Alexandria or other such vandalizing acts. I am pretty sure JK meant it something like this:

Do not (slavishly) rely on books to form your opinions; think (critically) for yourself.

Nothing else.

Buddha is supposed to have said much the same - per a book I read:

Appo deepo bhava

which is Pali or Prakrit for:

Be a light unto yourself.

Edit: orasis (sibling comment) probably said it better than me; it's just that in Indian thought, knowledge (jnana) is supposed to be one of the paths. Bhakti (devotion, e.g. Meera) and karma (action, e.g. Arjuna) are two among some others.
Butter is a type of shortening, but I don't know why it's phrased like that. The actual study mentions butter: http://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1246
Configuration comes from the environment. We store the configuration per cluster in a centralized store (C*, etcd, SimpleDB). We bake images that contain everything else.

Depending on the customer and the tech involved we'll do blue-green by doing a controlled rolling push of the config or image after it makes it through the dev/test cycle. Also depending on the type of tech we'll store actual data on network or host volumes.
https://codepen.io/dredmorbius/full/KpMqqB/