skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I certainly presume that it matters because the other player must have a theory of mind, and see a string of non-cooperative plays as an intentional penalty, and therefore predictive; that is something said other player can control by behaving better themselves in future.
I'd not feel bad one bit, you are preventing Hep C, HIV and many other infections from spreading by selling needles. There are already 3 million Hep C infected people in the US, despite it being a curable disease now :(
Because of tech sector demographics, this story is more relevant than other controversies like the wall.
If anyone thinks that this ruling is a surprise to the Trump administration, think again. I have no doubt that he conferred with his AG about his executive order and discuss possible outcomes such as a judge blocking his order. Maybe he expected this outcome?

Regardless, we'll see what his next move is.
It's easy to see how this directly relates to subjects that the general HN readership finds important, including possible ramifications in technology (startups, hiring, logistics, etc) and engineering and scientific academia/research. In the past few days, the amount of links concerning U.S. politics/govt. has actually seemed fairly light, considering the amount of things that could be said.
Clear from the judges order that this only helps those few immigrants caught in transit during the order being signed.
And those questions are making the big assumption that the person claiming they can bring back those jobs will actually be able to. You can't fight economics...
How could he have let the ban stay -- in its current form? Many people didn't like his decisions for various of their own preferences for particular outcomes, but he generally didn't "make new law" with his decisions.
Yep, hardly a peep at all. Where were the large scale protests? Where was the 24/7 media coverage across every possible outlet? Where was the widespread outrage? It didn't exist, which is why the story didn't continue to have legs and most forgot it ever happened.
It's concurrent in that multiple crawlers run at the same time. But I do not concurrently crawl single websites. An initial version had that, and Magnetissimo easily crawled 600 torrents every page 3 seconds (not hyperbole). It just pounded websites and I didn't want that. It was bad karma.
> "The affected people already present might have some standing to fight their denial of entry as they are here legally but people here illegally have no such right."

The biggest effect of this order is people here legally and those who previously had legal access to the US. There are a ton of people with legal grounding here, and this case holds significant precedent for them.
He doesn't have an AG yet.
Is it really that surprising given that he didn't win the popular vote?
It's been mentioned a few times elsewhere that Obama banned Iraqis from entering for 6 months in 2011.

Do you know anything about that and it's legality? How does it differ from Trumps ban?
I'm not doubting this but I've had Comcast internet for years and have never seen this happen. Perhaps because I don't use their DNS? Or because I use ad blockers (but only for the past couple of years). I supposed I might not have noticed if they were replacing ads, but I've never seen an account pop-up.
:laughing-and-crying:
Here's a CSS animation version, then, with illustration of the "box" aspect: https://jsfiddle.net/6937jx4L/
What do you expect when a reality tv star is elected president?
Definitely, as a Seattlite I'm all for it, less needles in parks, under I-5, and on the streets are good. Having users all in one place where they can be monitored, attended to and offered services much more effectively and at a lower cost to the taxpayer is also a huge win!
I'm just going to throw this out without comment or naming names.

Never ever attack your most enthusiastic customers.
>google for 3 hours to find the cheapest thing

I can always make more money.

I can't make more time.
The action we take now is so we don't have to say "if only"
People keep saying that the democratic candidate was less than ideal. So what would have been ideal? Who or what would have been your dream candidate for the 2016 election?
No, it specifically relates to increased security checks and verification for refugee visa-seeking applicants (a major discussion point of R governmental agenda, but since it was enacted by a Dem president he is still clearly soft/weak on terrorism).
Does anybody have experience with the logistics involved in organizing strangers against such actions?
A little OT, I guess, but the WaPo's story about this repeats a map I've seen that shows the seven countries.

Conspicuously absent are Egypt, Saudi Arabia, UAE and Lebanon, which is where the people who hijacked the 9/11 planes, the worst, and most logistically complex, terrorist act against the US ever, were from. Where's the logic? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks#FBI

I don't at all think that this order should be in effect, but I don't see the logic in its implementation.
There was an experiment with no politics for a week, but that got cancelled a while ago.
I would worry about it if I was still a PR. Even as a naturalized citizen I worry about it.
You don't shut down the city economies.

You boycott places that voted for Trump.
You might want to check with mods before you keep posting these.

Here's what they said to one other project doing similar: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11607103

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11537818

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11538499
You give them limited access and rights, to do what you want them to do. Here, they would have access to communications with government agencies, ability to tweet users or groups thereof, and perhaps responsibility for canary management.
Not to mention dual citizens. Who the heck is downvoting factual information?
Ask HN: What can one do using LFE (Lisp flavored Erlang) but not vanilla Erlang?
I know a bit of both Erlang and Lisp, but am an expert in neither. While looking around before picking up/learning more Erlang or Lisp for serious work, I came upon LFE and it seemed rather perfect (to me, and yes, I have looked at, and decided against, Elixir and a host of other things for myriad reasons) - Lisp with the Erlang VM (BEAM).

Looking a bit deeper, I find even Erlang can do things like functions to update functions (using abstract form http://erlang.org/doc/apps/erts/absform.html), similar to what Lisp macros would do (I only presume this, not knowing too much about either).

What are some useful things that can be done easily using LFE (Lisp flavored Erlang) but not (or would require a lot of effort in) vanilla Erlang? Are there any unique advantages (let's not talk about the syntax please, I'm so over it, fortunately) to doing LFE over ordinary Erlang?
This is tangencial but I don't think gumpy's comment could be considered "astroturfing".

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astroturfing
trackpad ≠ mouse pad

I think you may be talking about two different things.
Just wanted to let you know about a couple positive pieces of breaking news:

- http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-admi...

- https://www.aclu.org/news/federal-court-grants-stay-challeng...

It's up to her whether she wants to risk it obviously (personally I'd be hesitant), but being able to get back in with a green card as of this writing is not out of the question, because I'm aware that it has actually happened today. (If it changes 5 minutes from now don't kill me...)
by upvoting that post in stackoverflow, of course.
It's much more on the personal impact scale, but I built http://offsettrump.com for trying to get people to make things the tiniest bit better.
I don't know about your doctor but mine uses his computer to see my medical records, including before I moved to the city. Also he prints prescriptions.
grsecurity is enhancing the security of the kernel itself, SELinux is for user space applications.
Harmonics are caused by the different modes that any entity vibrates at (physical, electrical, or magnetic). If you strike and object with an impulse a rich array of vibrations will occur (think of a gong, a snare, a garage door) all of those modes will be present if you repeatedly strike or oscillate the object.
Wait, what do you think of Schrödinger's use of "negentropy" in "What is Life?" (1944), then?.
You might not want your bot to post in threads like this, which involve the deaths of people known to some in this community.
It makes them bigoted or evil because people likely said the exact same things about their ancestors (unless they are descended from native americans or the original british colonists)

http://www.ushistory.org/us/25f.asp

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2011/11/racist-...

Quoting the first line of the Atlantic article:

"There was a time in America when the Irish were characterized as apes, Italians as street filth, and Chinese as parasitic locusts."
Its a step in the right direction for Seattle, and hopefully we will go further to treat this epidemic.
Eve Elgato: https://www.elgato.com/en/eve/eve-room

Sadly they do not break it down by substance type (which the website almost suggests it does), but i find it very interesting to monitor and that the measurements are highly correlated with painting or opening a window.
>people here illegally have no such right.

People granted a Green Card are here illegally?
I would like to see a new approach to/insights from this idea using the Fluctuation Theorem. Maybe even in the language of David Deutsch's constructor theory..!

(I can already hear the scorn)
> Just because you don't like him?

As good as reason as any. Morals are a perfectly fine qualification on a person.

And is there anyone remaining that likes him?
No,his grandfather is not from those country,that's different.And I find many of your guys are brainwashed by the liberal media and education system,lost the ability to think independently.
Judge Blocks Trump’s Halt on Immigration from Muslim Nations
What the hell? What happened to "don't break userspace"?
I'm not a huge fan of unions but you're wrong about wage drops. Uber is artificially flooding the service with drivers intentionally to drive down wages and therefore the cost of rides. Haven't you seen the insane amount of advertising and rediculous incentive packages?

In markets Uber operates it is largely a monopoly so market mechanisms that would normally cause drivers to go elsewhere don't exist.

Take for example Austin Texas which has no Uber or Lyft. There's five or six competing ridesharing services with considerable market share. The drivers get paid more than twice as much as Uber drivers because it's easy for unsatisfied drivers to switch to a competitor. A few of my friends who did uber in Houston now drive 3 hours to Austin to pick up riders since the pay is much better
It's not obvious until you prove it, I'll buy that since I wasn't able to win this argument, a few decades ago. I remember being in Philosophy class trying to argue (decades ago now) that tit-for-tat tests were too narrow (too short) and that lagged-strategies (as I then called them) should work better than tit-for-tat in longer trials. The problem I saw with tit-for-tat being that you can get mutually locked into it; it's very common in real life to have two players/friends/spouses thinking the other began a barrage of mutual retaliation first. So incorporating at least brief resets or periods of forgiveness seemed a better strategy to me. An example of this lock-in from real life is that people who (often do to an abusive childhood) commonly misread others actions as deliberately hurtful to them end up divorced, or not able to get to marriage in the first place, often after a ton of tit-for-tat fights they think their partner started. Ditto, those who don't spend a lot of time thinking about the consequences for others of their actions or whether those could be misinterpreted.

Anyway, I made no headway with my professors (or other students, probably.) They were happy to call the results they then had proof that tit-for-tat was tops, and always would be 'cause it was such a simple, logical strategy. So, no, I can personally assure anyone who cares to know that it wasn't obvious to the experts then. As for laypeople... well it's most accurate to say they had no opinion; it was rough trying to explain PDs back then since they violated everyone's "folk expectations" in some way, whether you were religious or a rationalist and were rarely spoken or written of outside of academia.

I'd also say I didn't know it then, either; I just suspected - since it wasn't perfectly clear that my analogy from more ambiguous real-life exchanges would hold in such clearly-defined circumstances.
No. Sorry to have expressed myself poorly. Requiring people to wear shoes or else leave is the norm that I was thinking of. And to be clear I was trying to imagine what the reason would be for someone else to go barefoot.
Silicon Valley Discovers 'Making a Car Is Hard'
ACLU Wins Nationwide Injunction Against Deportation
This is why I paste to a plain-text editor first.
I find binary the easiest. You can get to 2^10 = 1024 easily.
Your citizen status has nothing to do with your standing to seek redress from a court.
This ban was made possible by the last administration. Obama set it all up, in multiple ways. Few seemed to care when he did it. This sudden outrage is the worst type of hypocrisy. Had these people protested Obama's terrible policies, it would have helped the current situation; Obama might have at least listened to his own voters.

Liberals will also suddenly re-discover that they don't like the NSA's vast, intrusive spying powers, after the Democrats in the House and Senate barely said a word against Obama's 10x expansion of such over his eight years. Now that all of that power is in Trump's hands, the protests to come are trivial to anticipate.
The president at that time didn't write an executive order preventing the entry of holders of legally approved visas or green cards from entering the country.

What they did do was pause the refugee program, which is wildly different than what you're attempting to imply:

http://thefederalist.com/2015/11/18/the-obama-administration...

And even if what you did imply happened and I've somehow missed that, you don't get to use past wrongs to justify present wrongs.
I get that to some degree, and something like PuTTY makes it really unecessarily complicated.

But really, I find that people have trouble running ssh-keygen and then finding the key and sending me the correct one (they'll often send the private key, or more likely they'll send me both "just use the one you need".)
Unless the dems block all those nominnees. If they do, we could actually see some bipartisan work to appoint moderates.
Non-citizens can absolutely sue the government in Federal court. What do you think Boumediene v Bush was?

Nice to see you already walking back your incorrect claims though. Perhaps in the future you will refrain from making blanket and false assertions on the law.
An injunction against new EOs would be a rather fascinating Constitutional crisis...
I just came here to say i read the WP article, and it sounds highly plausible. Unfortunately the actionable advice isn't a quick fix, but requires lasting social change. A tall order indeed. Godspeed to us over the coming years, i fear it's going to be rough.
Yes. If it weren't possible to influence people's political positions, I think we wouldn't have campaigns or other political movements or organizations.
Twice, I think, the Obama administration put a hold on refugee applications from Iraq. Trump's order blocks entry to the country to all people from Iraq and 6 other country, not just as refugees (who will reside here indefinitely) but for any reason at all, even if they are already lawful permanent residents of the US.

Anyone telling you that these are comparable actions has an agenda you should be suspicious of.
Decision and Order link https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/darweesh-v-trump-decisio...
Extensive discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13511348
So what? America's history is overwhelmingly white and Christian. The vast majority of immigration to the US has been from white, Christian nations, even more so at the time when the Statue of Liberty was erected. Is the US a nation of Yemeni immigrants? It's silly to simply treat all potential immigrants as if they are the same. Also, it's disingenuous to reference the Statue of Liberty as some kind of justification for unlimited immigration from all nations of the world. The USA is not a dumping ground for the world's poor.
US citizenship is simply not a requirement to have standing in a federal court.
It certainly would not get to the Supreme Court unless a lower court ruled against Trump and Trump decided to appeal. However, that's probably the most likely scenario anyway.
Except now it may be too late, which is why when you have a President that is of your own party, you protest their terrible policies so they will (hopefully) listen. Presidents do not tend to listen to the opposition protestors (and that's all the more true when said President's party has the House, Senate, and Supreme Court).
No one seems to be talking about that fact that Trump can do these things because the Congress has specifically authorized the president to do so. It seems as though a massive amount of power in one person's hands is OK is some situations but not in others, depending on one's political persuasion.

And the list of countries is from Homeland Security's list of "countries of concern" compiled during the Obama administration. And signed into law by Obama himself.

https://sethfrantzman.com/2017/01/28/obamas-administration-m...

Of course some will blast me as supporting Trump or supporting this ban. Not true.
I have yet to see anyone try to justify the choice of countries. I know I live in a bit of a bubble with regard to the particular Trump brand of conservatism, but I usually see people arguing the opposite side, even if it's just being quoted by people who agree with me.
Yeah, Ubuntu still keeps running out of space in /boot by filling it w old kernels in the default partition profile. A bug that I've been hitting since about 2011.

In spite of their best efforts, it is not the "grandma friendly" quality software it hoped to be.
I’m one of the cofounders at data.world and you definitely make good points… We encourage all users to post a license with their datasets but, like open source, not everyone will maintain or honor these. This is definitely something that we feel we can help the open data community with and encourage even more. (As an aside, in general you should note is that a lot of data scraped from websites is something that you’ll need to be careful with).

When it comes to data quality, the world is a messy place and the data that comes from it is messy too. Most professional data scientists spend an inordinate amount of time cleaning datasets, doing feature engineering etc… it’s part of their job description. We’re trying to eliminate some of that repetitive work by making sure that people can comment on, contribute to and give some signal back on the quality of the dataset. We also think a dataset is more than just the data... on data.world you can upload code, Notebooks, images, etc... anything that helps add context to the data.

Finally, when it comes to size... ML definitely needs it. However, there's a lot of interesting data out there thats still very complicated, very useful but not that big. Most datasets in the world are well under the terabyte size (or even 100s of GBs in size). We're rapidly expanding the size of datasets we support because we want that stuff too but we really want to help people understand all the data in the world!
Not that I agree with the EO, but the logic behind it was that 6 of those 7 countries have ongoing insurgencies involving the IS, and Iran was dragged in there due to either existing prejudice or more likely their involvement in Syria and Iraq.

If this was entirely driven by religion they'd better put Bosnia and Albania on the list too.
That's one way to downplay the tens of thousands of refugees displaced by the rebels the Obama administration armed, which, by the way, caused both Brexit to win and secured Trump's seat.

Good thing the Internet really went to town talking about how the left needs to be more introspective after Trump's win, it seems we all learned from that.
Here are a couple relevant studies:

Resonant breathing biofeedback training for stress reduction among manufacturing operators
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23294659

Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama Practice on Cognitive Functions In Healthy Volunteers
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3939514/

Both citations from https://www.reddit.com/r/Nootropics/comments/25kfkf/breath_o...
From what I've read, most of today's protests have been ad hoc. Most just famous or political people saying "Show up at JFK" or "Show up at LAX".

The fact that so many people gathered (at so many airports) without any kind of major force behind them shows that this order was clearly misguided.
Correct. America is not a giant shopping mall for the world, it's a country. "Love it or leave it" is an entirely appropriate and necessary statement.
1023, if you're using the natural representation of zero.
I feel it's important to mention that not all drug users are addicts. So where is the line between 'drug user' and 'problematic addict' being drawn here? ...Are you conflating the two?

There are so many situations in which someone might illegally use drugs.

For instance, I self-medicate with various substances. I've gotten great relief over the years with ketamine, lsd, and mdma. I learned how to administer drugs in a safe and cautious manner. I have never been arrested, nor had any major social conflict, while under the influence.

With your approach, I should be sought after and sentenced.

Interesting
Calling all large and small tech companies, it's time to: Form Voltron!
and exercise your science, technology and TCP/IP prowess to send the proper signals and PSAs and counter this misinformed administration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZZv5Z2Iz_s
I think you are overstating it. If it were not Trump, this would not be top story on HN.
Yeah, we're monitoring this pretty closely and have already gone back and forth on it twice. The complicating factor is that I was supposed to join her and we'd meet up with her family beforehand (who I've never met because they live in Iran and haven't been able to get US visas). I think the plan, as of right now, is to still go, but I'm going to change my original plans to allow us to cross the border back into the country together too. If a problem arises, I'm going to do everything I can to get the ACLU on it and publicize it, and hopefully that pressure from a US citizen will be enough.
Ibogaine is a miracle. If only more people knew about it.
I didn't mess with swappiness, but I also didn't have a swap.
The reason people are upset is because banning Muslims from many countries, when a chief political advisor and propagandist [1] Bannon has called for a white-only US, is what authoritarians do.

Hannah Arendt in her work on 1930s Germany described how well meaning people would fact check the government, but the government's statements were not about what was was true, but what would need to be true to justify their actions.

http://pbs.twimg.com/media/CykynrCXEAAJOSE.jpg:large

[1] Breitbart.
This wouldn't have five votes even with a Trump nominee. I'm not sure it'd have three.
Yeah, it seems to trick the mechanism that detects the lid is closed. It took me a while to discover why my work laptop would go to sleep as I was typing, when I had it stacked on top of my (closed) personal laptop.