skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I seriously doubt the intention of people behind this order has anything to do with security and safety of US citizens. In fact from my point of view, looking at the list of the countries which are banned you can see they could not care less about US citizens. For instance, for crying out load, 15 out of 19 hijackers involved in 9/11 were Saudi citizens. But why Saudi Arabia is not in the list? This is just a game of politics.
Actually, one of the points emphasized by the book is that extra nines cost significant amounts of money and you need to figure out your optimal SLO accordingly.

I recently worked with a client who was OK with one 9, because they valued rapid development above all other things. Not many would make this trade-off consciously, but they did and it worked for them.
I don't think that this EO is applied to holders of valid green cards in the US but definitely people on visas like H1B are definitely to be affected but I think that a company of the size of Google could make some arrangements as a quick remedial to situation by transferring some to other countries where they have operations to work from there till they figure out how to handle this situation going forward.
Good. The income of laborers and low-wage workers has been artificially suppressed due to uncontrolled immigration working at rates lower than minimum wage. My hope is that these actions will increase the wages of the lower class, which will increase the velocity of the dollar in America and get our economy going again.

It is sad that many illegal immigrants will be deported, but if we provide a path to citizenship, it sends a message to others thinking about coming illegally that if you come and wait long enough, you'll gain citizenship. That's a dangerous message in my opinion.
These domains would still have their advantage if they managed to get big before the omnibox took over, wouldn't they?
I thought the Snowden revelations were going to be the turning point. But it turned out it was not a turning point, but just a wake-up call.

I honestly don't see a revolution coming if Signal is shut down. There will be some angry folks, sure, and that will last a while, but then everyone will move on. Exactly as it happened with the Snowden revelations.
Why Every Movie Looks Sort of Orange and Blue
> I think the situation in the UK is very similar - nationalism and patriotism are being exploited to sell people a false story of immigrants taking their jobs, lowering wages and causing crime.

I haven't seen any evidence of this, outside of the tabloids (which would be business as usual)

> As to Trump being a clean sweep, there's nothing clean about his cabinet or advisors - he has one of the most traditional, male, rich, white cabinets in recent history and even includes family in his inner circle and in meetings.

clean sweep as in the old guard and their policies are gone (not the case in the UK)
Flux capacitors?
I'm sure it's the Europeans who feel very foolish right now, having taken in millions of refugees who don't share their values.

Not gonna happen here folks.

You're the one who will be shocked when Trump wins in a landslide in 2020.
I've lived in Canada my whole life, but I'm also a born U.S. citizen.

I feel hopeful about the outcome of the election. I'm interested to see what can happen with an effective reset of corporate sponsorship in the highest seat of government. The nice side effect of businesses not believing that he could become president, is that they didn't have as much time to buy favours.

The proposed rules for regulatory bodies (one in, two out) could considerably reduce the financial and emotional cost of doing business in the U.S. and perhaps finally undo some long-standing pay-for-play regulations.
As it stood, I would have felt terrified and uncertain if I were to start a business in the U.S. one year ago.

I don't think Donald Trump is necessarily any better of a person than the other candidates; but I think he has a better chance of doing good by accident. The alternatives seemed like they were trying to trick the U.S. into paying for their expensive lifestyles in spite of the consequences to the public.
Technical solutions engineering (TSE) may fit the bill, especially for more mature products. Think support on steroids, where you're empowered to fix the customer's problem.

Obligatory disclaimer: I'm one, and we're hiring ;)
You should look for sitemaps. They are often listed in robots.txt. Will save you lots of time!

These sites have sitemaps:
http://torrentproject.se/robots.txt
https://www.torrentdownloads.me/robots.txt
https://thepiratebay.org/robots.txt
http://goldtorrents.com/robots.txt
https://bitsnoop.com/robots.txt

Enough with the hype: "high performance" What??
Your program is not concurrent: you have one process per website and go through URLs one at a time.
You don't even use Bloom filters.
I would argue that our economy is not in fine shape. Millennials make 20 percent less than boomers did at the same part of life. Wages are stagnant, especially among laborers, lower class, and those in rural areas. Growing inequality combined with a higher cost of living means that the rich and highly populated areas are doing fabulously while the quality of life for the rest is declining.

Edit: spelling
Yes, that could happen. But there's the Spider-Man Rule: "with great power comes great responsibility".

They're running a major international media outlet over there, and they do have some pretty heavyweight responsibilities that come with that, even if it conflicts with their personal lives.
What do to about twitter?
Panel Appointed by the African Union Commission to Advise on Technology
In both scenarios the person's property is being stolen.

Their property might be in the form of information, sure.

But one product being more widely distributed does not make any ethical difference. The fundamental is that the information/property has been stolen in both cases.
"once you have completed the verification process for a given sub-domain you do not need to go through the same process again to issue a new certificate"

Authz (the ACME terminology for a data structure recording that your account is validated for a particular FQDN) have finite lifetime, right now it's 90 days, long enough to get one default renewal but it is expected to shorten to seven days or less at some point.

So, you should still expect to re-do the DNS validation challenge a few times per year.
Yes, god forbid we'd have some humanity.

And I didn't notice America picking up its share of the refugees from countries where America wages war before this EO so I'm not really sure what you're getting at.

The previous world war caused millions of people to be uprooted from their homes and to depend on the charity and hospitality of places that did not 'share their values' and yet it worked out fine in the long run.
The 100 best leadership and success books to read in your lifetime
The Importance of Aligning Authority with Responsibility (2010)
"Good. The income of laborers and low-wage workers has been artificially suppressed due to uncontrolled immigration working at rates lower than minimum wage. My hope is that these actions will increase the wages of the lower class, which will increase the velocity of the dollar in America and get our economy going again."

Or, you know, we'll just import whatever it is for 2 cents more instead of paying people to do it.
Unless you start to make it artificially expensive to do that through tariffs.
In which case, you are essentially trying to prop up the entire economy on a house of cards. Which is what got us into a mess in the first place.

You can't build a sustainable economy on pretending things aren't actually cheap and that people aren't willing to get paid next to nothing to do them.

It's the same thinking that, for example has us building m1 abrams tanks that we toss in the desert, never to be used again, because "these people need jobs", despite the military not actually wanting to build them anymore and desperately trying to get congress to let them cancel it.

In the best case, this kind of silliness lasts until things get automated.
In most cases, this kind of silliness lasts a lot shorter time period than that because your economy is not competitive with others who aren't pretending (IE China, et al).

So unless step 2 of this master plan is "somehow completely isolate ourselves from the rest of the world while making tons of money, ..."
This is like an advertisement for guns, with a laser sight on the gun, pointed at someone.

Gun ownership is not a crime. But the gun is shown in a scenario where a crime is about to be committed.

At first I didn't have any issue but this analogy seems to have convinced me it's a bad image to use.
With paper you can't erase obviously

I can, and do, quite easily. I have a twist-out eraser on the end of my pencil plus an artists' eraser in each pen/pencil bag, so I can make pretty quick work of some portion of a page, but if I really want to erase the page, I can do it faster with paper than with a whiteboard: I turn the page.
I haven't seen any evidence of this, outside of the tabloids

Recent examples from the conservative conference:

Exhibit 1: Amber Rudd vows to stop migrants 'taking jobs British people could do' and force companies to reveal number of foreigners they employ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/04/jeremy-hunt-nhs-d...

Exhibit 2: On immigration and jobs, Theresa May employs the post-truth politics of Donald Trump http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/05/on-immigration-an...

Exhibit 3: Official policy is to cut migration to tens of thousands (that order of magnitude cut would leave many industries short of staff with an ageing population)
Also... how self-sufficient can California be? I am thinking especially of water.
walking helps too
Yeah, something's off there.

I think the clustering is not done by GMaps, so maybe OP can do something about it. From what I can see, clusters have a too large radius, so when zooming in, some items leave the viewport before being uniquely visible.
I'm thinking defense from the U.S.
You also can't build a sustainable economy by importing everything and expecting everyone to be highly educated. Not everyone is capable of earning a degree, and those in the lower class need to have the potential for a comfortable life.

Edit: to those downvoting me, can you please explain?
My advice? Start small. You might want to build a car, but in order to do this, you first need to build a dozen skateboards before moving on to bicycles. As for Secure Boot - it takes expertise in breaking things to build something unbreakable. I have broken commercial copy protection using nothing but an adjustable power supply and some assembly code - protection that, on paper, seemed "good enough". If you think you can build something secure without decades of experience, you haven't really understood how much power a determined engineer equipped with a fast FPGA wields over your puny electronics.
You need only look at the banlieues of Paris, full of second and third generation Middle Easterners who hate France and hate French values to prove my point.
On how I started a SaaS service earning 1568$ within its first month
"Immigration is about serving Anerica's interests, not the interests of those who would come here."

Tell that to the Native Americans.
Also unless you are one of them, at some point, your parents or their parents or ..., almost certainly got here not through something that was not in the interest of "serving America's interests".

But now that you got yours, ...
The quality of life for the 'rest' is declining but none of these executive orders have even begun to address that problem.

The world is changing and no amount of wishing is going to change it back, the only way to survive change at that level is to adapt rather than to complain and wish for yesterday to return. It may sound harsh but it won't and any attempt to force yesterday to return is simply going to set back the country as a whole relative to the rest of the world.

Given that America more than most plucked the fruits of this whole globalization thing it is really strange to see it wanting to turn back the clock now, and I fear that the resulting set-back will be paid disproportionally by those laborers, 'lower classes' (let's say the poor) and people in rural areas.

Not that Trump will eat one oyster less.
Rust isn't a cure-all for every security issue.
The Song ‘Oh Yeah’ from ‘Ferris Bueller’s Day Off’ is the Origin of a Fortune
I don't think it's fair to expect scientific output to be comparable to Hollywood. Anyway, your colleagues think this is a pirate site?
> The income of laborers and low-wage workers has been artificially suppressed due to uncontrolled immigration working at rates lower than minimum wage.

Source?
The ones who were engaged in tribal wars of conquest with each other before Europeans ever showed up?
I think it is a bit concerning that P2P is litterally letting everyone connect to your PC.

But

In many aspects it could be safer than the regular Web.

Tech like IPFS already stores everything by its hash, so chances that you download malicious software that was added behind an URL that once was "good" is almost zero.

Also these system would load-balance rather nicely, the more people want something, the faster it will distribute to more nodes and easier to get.
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Distraction factor also counts. My comment was probably a little arrogant though. The reason I said I'd prefer that was so that the manager would have to expend effort to get an answer immediately, to offset my own distraction. "If I have to be distracted then I'm taking you down with me" kind of thing.
Those are not representative of Europe or even of France.

And you could even doubt to what extent the situation there is accurately described by the word 'full', plenty of people there do not hate France and do not hate the French (if only because they are French themselves...).
OK, you clearly did not read the article because you are incorrect.

That statement you quote is referring to the still image in the article, below the video, which is of an entirely different star and system of planets (Fomahault b).

The video has a time legend /embedded in the movie/, at the bottom of the frame clearly showing when the observation for each frame of the video was taken.

NASA was being plenty up front here, I think you maybe just skimmed the article slightly too quickly.
Can you describe an np complete problem that you have solved?
That seems like a dodge to me.
Let's stick with the point you tried to make:
Was the immigration of everyone else done only in their best interest?
(clearly not, since they were almost all killed).
Or was instead done in the interest of others?

Could you clearly delineate the point for me when it became okay to change immigration policy from the former to the latter?
Was it right after your ancestors got here, or sometime before?

Was it before or after we put the big statue in ny harbor memorializing the former?
The Steps to Sitting Pretty This Time Next Year with Your Blog
To those who are modding people down for answering the parent's question, cut it out.
Sure, I believe you. /s
Its unreasonable to expect people to make life changing decisions based on nice sounding but ultimatley meaningless phrases.
This was not the preference of "the people". It was the preference of the the (narrow) preference of the voters in a handful of states important in the Electoral College process.
I'm confused. It sounds like you're suggesting that the Native Americans would have done better if they had been led by someone like Trump. Would that be a fair characterization?
Your Functional Programs Are Imperative Pumpkins
> having taken in millions of refugees

The IOM and UNHCR estimates say that Europe took 1M refugees and migrants until December 2015. That's the highest it has received in a year. So, the claim of "MillionS" of refugees is a pure exaggeration.
No country on that list has had a national commit an act of terror on US soil since 1975 or so.

Nor do any of them have Trump brand hotels in them.
hence, the only real hope being basic income and friends, not sticking head in the sand and pretending world has not changed.

You simply aren't going to be able to provide a lower class a comfortable life by giving them work that doesn't actually need doing. Worse, trying probably ends very badly.
And the other four were from Egypt, Lebanon and the UAE, also not on the list. Yet the EO starts by using the September 11 attacks as an example of the consequences of not vetting foreign nationals thoroughly.
Logic. There are 11 million illegal immigrants in a country of about 300 million. Assuming around 7 million of those work & assuming 6 million of those work at or below minimum wage, that means that 2 percent of the population is probably underpaid. That doesn't sound like much until you consider that almost all of that 2 percent is working in some sort of manual labor, whether it's agriculture, construction or housework.
Theresa May wants to close the UK off to foreigners. It's just her, but as a popular PM she has a lot of domestic power -- more than Trump. She can make laws.

You're right that the old power structures are still intact and if they decide to assert themselves over the Conservative party then Theresa May could be removed (it's not like she was elected into the position to start with).
"It means that there is no way to solve them deterministically in reasonable amount of time."

On the contrary, the systematic method to hack these seems to be pattern matching and shoehorning into similar problems rather than reasoning from first principles. I'm going through a similar battle, mainly because programming interviews have annoyingly become competitive challenges lately and before adopting a strategy it was an extremely soulsucking process.
> This suspension could be renewed very easily and even extended to other countries

Well, it seems that the current execute order is illegal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/trumps-immigratio...
That wasn't immigration. That was the dislocation of one people by another. 90% of Indians died shortly after first contact because of smallpox, which moved faster than the Europeans themselves did.

And of course, if the Indians had their informed choice, they would never have wanted Europeans to come.

But they didn't have the power to do anything about it. This world doesn't care about right and wrong, only weak and strong.

Edit:

Actually you're dead wrong. There was no immigration essentially from the start of the republic until the late 1800s, and again almost none between 1920 and 1950. And until the 60s, it was only from European societies for the most part.
> These things are by design.

And this is why, I'm of the opinion that the design needs to be changed.
George Jesus Borjas, Harvard Economics prof has thoughts on this:
http://cis.org/Borjas
Is it really meaningful though? I could call a human a space-time worm, and it makes no difference.
Applies to all aliens, which includes GC holders:

According to NY Daily News:
"Within hours of President Trump’s executive order limiting immigration from Muslim countries, green card and visa holders were already being blocked from getting on flights to the U.S."

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/trump-order-blocks-...
And what a great country it is. Causing in war in Iraq, Afghanistan, supporting the civil war in Syria and then leaving it to Europe to deal with the refugees.

I guess you must be really proud of your country now.
> They are not laws and can certainly be illegal

Turns out, that the specific Immigration Trump order is illegal.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/27/opinion/trumps-immigratio...
Ideally you are right, but instead of arguing about an ideal that will never happen in our two-party political system, I think we should try to think of a solution that will at least somewhat work in this country. At very least, it will work as an economic band-aid until we can change our political system.
> I'm interested to see what can happen with an effective reset of corporate sponsorship in the highest seat of government.

This isn't that, it is rather the opposite.
A couple thoughts come to mind after reading this

1. Is the FBI ignoring the reality of the state of technology? There are plenty of non-service provider dependent modes of communication that you just couldn't compel like you would with CALEA.

2. You need to extend the intercept mandate to individuals running Tor nodes, open source technology developers and right on down to the individual using the technology. To do this our government would need to place strict regulations on communication technologies and encryption.

3. Does the FBI have its NSA peers in the executive branch to thank for abusing warrantless snooping that has triggered the actions of name brand and niche communication providers alike to implement stronger cryptos? Now they want our sympathy?
We may be closer than we thought to dangerous climate thresholds
yep, I knew the Amber Rudd speech would be in your reply to my comment.

1) has been thoroughly debunked: she never said what the press accused her of saying. try and find the speech where she's talking about employers making lists of foreigners... you won't be able to because it doesn't exist.

I looked quite extensively at the time for it, as I was horrified by what press were reporting her as saying... shame it's fake news.

(in actual fact it was one of many potential ideas in a briefing note before the speech)

2) is an opinion piece, not evidence
Unfortunately, the PDF rendering in browsers is typically slow and limited in functionality, and often renders poorly on screen and hopelessly badly on a printer. Even basic functionality like showing 2-up layouts or handling forms seems to be beyond them.

Obviously there are legitimate concerns about security with browser plugins, but replacing them with half-baked built-in alternatives isn't going well so far.
People have lives, friends, and family. Not just work.
This is why I keep a notebook next to my bedside - I have my best ideas just before sleep or upon waking.
If the logic is so sound, it should not be difficult to prove. So, I'd wait until you prove it via data and get accepted by an independent fora. Until then, this is one of the many plausible theories.
> No country on that list has had a national commit an act of terror on US soil since 1975 or so.

See? It's working already!
It's just supply and demand isn't it? If you have a larger supply of workers due to laws around immigration being laxed, does it not stand to reason that the increased competition would lead to lower wages?

Especially when an economy is not at full employment, like the the US.
The point is that America's policy has never been what he claims. It's never been "immigration exists to serve america's interest".

If it had been, most people in the US today would likely not be here.

As for done better, no, that's the other point.

The europeans still would have killed them anyway, no matter who was leading them.

In the same way that if they really really wanted to, the terrorists would just kill us anyway, and immigration policy wouldn't change a damn thing.
> I'm interested to see what can happen with an effective reset of corporate sponsorship in the highest seat of government

I think that until now it is exactly the contrary you say

> The proposed rules for regulatory bodies (one in, two out) could considerably reduce the financial and emotional cost of doing business in the U.S.

And this is not in favour of the corporate sponsorship, is it?

I suppose outing all the evil environment regulations is very good for corporations and business but how about the actual people?

> I don't think Donald Trump is necessarily any better of a person than the other candidates; but I think he has a better chance of doing good by accident.

You seem to have a very specific definition of good. It only applies to corporations
While forth can be quite elegant at times and I have fond memories of using Mops, I wish modern forth dialects were statically type checked.