skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sure, the framers meant to protect the information, not the paper stock. But they gave a right against a particular way of accessing that information. They prohibited warrentless searching or seizing--i.e. infringing your property rights in--the paper, not a blanket right against the government collecting that information by any means.

If the framers had intended to protect the information regardless of source, whether or not it was contained in your papers and effects, they would have done so. The framers did not have Facebook, but they would have understood the importance of sensitive information held by third parties. They were merchants, bankers, wealthy farmers, and lawyers. They would have been able to conceive of, for example, the government collecting manifests from a shipper to prosecute a merchant for evading taxes. Or subpoenaing books from an accountant. The fundamental legal question underlying a big chunk of the surveillance issue--can the government force Facebook to give it information Facebook has about a user--has been teed up ever since subpoenas and accountants existed (both a couple of hundred years prior to the founding).

What the framers did not contemplate is that one day the government would not have to infringe your property rights to get all your personal information.
Has Anyone Really Been Far Even as Decided to Use Even Go Want to do Look More Like?
Currently, that kind of exists in 2dr form as the Toyota 86 platform (Subaru BRZ/Scion FR-S):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_86

For 4dr GTs, it gets quite a bit tougher to compete with second-hand Maserati prices.
I have no reason to believe that there's any malice involved here.

I also think that incidents like this might become more common as the state of cyber warfare progresses. As engineers, we should take care to build secure software, especially when that software underlies important systems. We should impress upon non-technical management the importance of doing so, even if it may take a little more time or money in the short term.
Depends on how much value you place on office socialising, which certainly has it's benefits. It can also have a big impact on hiring when it becomes heresy to question things like diversity quotas.

One I often see personally is not being able to discriminate based on communication ability out of fear of being labelled racist.
Download Van Long Term Def.ehi
LDHosting's shared hosting costs me 35€/year, gives 5GB of disk space and lets me upload my own cert for free. I've been with them for a few years and the uptime has been excellent.
Who enforces the law? How does their labour get paid for?
Does this approach consistently ward off burnout? I was considering doing something like not using a computer at all for an entire day each week (probably Saturday).
Yeah this is the thing, learning languages isn't nearly as important as learning frameworks, idioms, etc.
I did now. But I need to book soon, so I think this has a long term lease in my browser tabs real estate :)
I think the Democratic party is in real danger of being politically encircled. "Knock yourself out, take the center."
Your information is wrong.

Carrier didn't get bags of cash to create a handful of jobs.

It's a thousand jobs at an average of $31 per hour in wages, not to mention benefits.

It's up to $7m in incentives spanning ten years.

The jobs are worth about $850 million to $1 billion in total compensation over ten years. The $7 million represents less than 1% of that value. The income taxes, sales taxes, local spending, etc, etc, etc. is worth drastically more to that community and the state than the tiny $700k per year incentive.
Fairly authentic characters regularly have drastically diverse viewpoints. For instance, Republicans and Democrats. Parties on both sides have fairly authentic views[1] on various moral points, that end in very, very different opinions. And no amount of intelligent reasoning or debate will bring either party closer to the other.

[1]Both parties ALSO have fairly unauthentic views, on how they will in fact, happily sell us out to a corporation for a side gig when they leave office. But they tell us they won't and that's shameful to even suggest that's what they're doing.
Waiting in SLC terminal. Crew has to be off the clock in an hour. Not likely getting home tonight.
A very nicely done fallacy.

I met a guy who took a gun and actually shot nazis in the subway. He also did some spying.

He was not french enough, right leaning enough, christian enough for our post WWII whitewashed history hero named general De Gaulle so his net was burned. Ordered to inaction when Gestapo was coming for him.

He ended up at Buchenwald under the newly crafted name of a terrorist (nazi neologism). He organized one of the revolt in the camp.

According to this post, this guy should be condemned. According to the actual history his behaviours like others anonymous heroes played a major role in shortening WWII and saving innocent lives.

Sometimes, there is a time to fight. Maybe not now, and I have no opinion on Trump, he is not even my president. And, I don't even care of USA, or any flags. He too was not sure. You know, standing up is not an easy choice. Nothing can tell you if you are 100% right when you do something. And it is not easy living with the burden of violence. But what he did was against the laws and rules of the time.

But I am glad one day this old man stood up for me to live in a country that is way more tolerant than the nazi regim.

I am just lucky this guy never read and was convinced by this article.

And sorry man. There are days where a man have to fight. I did it quite a few time in my life. Sometimes you get called a psycho, sometimes you get beaten and your nose get broken. But when you protect someone you care about, you fight. And, sorry to break the myth, I am randomly french. and I do fight even with my fists when I see a danger.

This article is just a random essay turning cowardice into virtue using submission to a dysfunctional authority and forged traditions as an excuse.

You don't punch nazis to end nazism you do kill them. And that is how people died. They died killing them to ensure this article could be written.

Yes, wars and conflicts are ugly, and no one wishes to experience them. That is the reason why you sometime have to resist actively with no moral compass to ensure you are the nice guy.

Real life sux. Sometimes we have to dirty our hands to make a brighter future hoping you are not the bad guys and things will turn right.

Welcome to the life of real people that have a pair.
Seeing this as well. The most ironic of my observations was that the most liberal of my friends would support the release of Chelsea Manning, but insisted on prosecuting Snowden.
This is why probation periods exist. Either you value the individual or you don't. You either both agree on a fixed amount or you don't. If the individual says no. He feels undervalued.
The US airline industry has a serious problem with these outages. By my count, 4 major airlines have been hit with system-wide computer-related outages in the last year (southest, jetblue, delta, united).

This article goes into some detail of why it happens: http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/08/technology/delta-airline-com.... It seems like human error and fragile computer systems are the biggest issues.
> Would you rather pay somebody to build the next Lincoln Tunnel or pay for them to write some poetry and start an emo band?

Would you rather pay somebody to build the next Bridge to Nowhere or pay them to start the next Apple?
> a specific example that works the other way: "Americans are child murderers (just look at school shootings) and drug abusers (look at number of jailed for drugs) and some, I assume, are good people. Other countries shouldn't let Americans in if they don't want those problems."

The problem with the example is it is purely qualitative, not quantitative.

Yet, I notice, in comparison to Trumps quote you tacked something on the end:

> Other countries shouldn't let Americans in if they don't want those problems.

Did Trump suggest all Mexican immigration end forever?
Hmm, vacation duration tops out at 31 days and budget at $4000 per person in Los Angeles. This tool discriminates against the idle super rich ;)

Edit to add: I love the design, and I love the idea. Keep adding to it!
> It's actually pretty difficult not to be racist. I'm racist, for example, as are pretty much all other white people in the US...No white person is wholly racist or wholly not racist, it's all shades of gray...

It's incredibly easy to not be racist if you're not racist. I've spent zero effort to continue not being racist this year (same as last year).

I'd say that it's weird that you're singling out white people in the US (which is also amusing, because opposed to what other country?) as racist, but you've already self-reported as a racist. It appears that you're working on this and I wish you the best of luck.

Also, anyone can be racist, not just white people.
DACA: whether ther 1/4 million approved or the 2 million eligble, it is unknown whether they will be targeted for deportation. Undocumented workers: past Republican administrations have engaged in work place raids as an enforcement action on workers themselves, rather than on employers engaging in illegal hiring. Muslims? It's not unreasonable for them to debate in their own mind whether the president is sincere, and if sincere then they have every reason to consider being rounded up. If he was insincere that results in its own trust issue.
Passwords are NOT by definition sensitive, and this is the sort of absolutist nonsense that I'm complaining about. Passwords are only as sensitive as the data they access.
You can't manually implement the `Copy` trait?
Project Manager vs. Product Manager – What Are the Differences and Relations? -
Just for future reference, please don't quote using the four-spaces code block. It can make it difficult to read on mobile, and often requires scrolling from side to side on desktop.

Please, instead, use the `>` (meme arrow). While it does not add markup, it does make it significantly more readable. Thanks.
Curiosity examines possible mud cracks on Mars
Every one that's trying to save the environnement is doing it because we need to.
What's the diff and why?
Reality has strong opinions on things, too.
Remember when the state legislatures in "Conservative" "Republican" states like Texas voted to ban Tesla sales in their state?

Lots of people in Wyoming and Texas vote "conservative" and conservatives are supposed to advocate for the free market.

And those people claim to be "conservative" want capitalism and the free market UNTIL the free market threatens to put their jobs at risk. Maybe they were never really conservative in first place?
There are some tool sheds (or tool library) in Seattle that offer fixing sessions. On mobile but look for west Seattle.
Thanks for sharing that. It was an awesome read!
Of course, there's also the "drop your average blue collar worker into my job and they'd be fired within the week, if not the day"... Not to say I wouldn't be fired within the day at their job, just saying that both kinds of jobs are demanding. (Yes, yes, you could probably train them to do my job, but I could work out to build the strength to do theirs).
Given that the US grid is highly interconnected, would this legislation require Wyoming utilities to avoid using renewable-generated electricity from sources outside Wyoming?

This would seem to require that Wyoming's utilities isolate the state's grid to prevent using "eligible resources", according to the bill.
There really does need to be a better way to style inputs. It's all over the place now. Hell, just making `type=search` look the same across browsers isn't as straight forward as it should be.
Why would you think a tax on personal income is the only way to do that?
By and large, the industry is embracing open source (BSD, MIT, Apache licenses), but not FSF-style free software (GPL).
I have a comfy lounge chair in my living room. It's very different than sitting in a desk, so it's a good ritual for 'play time' coding. I'll crank the music a bit louder, have tea or whiskey in the evening, and try to work on things that are interesting and don't have a deadline (usually open source work, though not always).

This seems to be enough of a change of pace that it's relaxing. Now, sometimes it just doesn't work. The nights I'm feeling particularly burned out or not in the mood I'll just work out and then watch netflix.
He reminds me of one of those story characters that gets distracted whenever he passes by a mirror. "Am I handsome? I am. Do you think I'm handsome???"
Code a React website on your Android smartphone
World Map Shows What a Hyperloop Future May Look Like
> SGI's old campus

Only now do I recognize the blue towers at the GooglePlex as resembling those purple SGI computers.
sigh

Yet again, I initially receive nothing but downvotes for providing a full response with various counterpoints, links etc, yet no comebacks or refutations...
How about the South China Morning Post, whom Snowden also provided with classified information? Does that also merely call into question merely whom he went to, not what he did?
95% of the bulk of the document is endless tariff elimination tables. I hope you'll forgive me that I glossed over them. If you're concerned about the ISDS mechanism the relevant parts are in Chapter 9, with some exceptions listed in Chapter 29.

Regarding the tobacco exclusions, it seems punitive to me, they were definitely being bad actors under previous ISDS mechanisms. You're right, though, the public health interest carveouts in the TPP's ISDS implementation (based on a recent Canadian BIT) would provide sufficient tools to allow unfettered regulation without needing to ban them wholesale. These carveouts were not present in the BIT in the PM vs Australia case, for example.

So why were tobacco bad actors? In the Australian case, they launched a suit claiming that by enforcing plain packaging Australia was in essence, appropriating their brand, packaging and associated goodwill. You may think they shouldn't win this argument, I may think they shouldn't win this argument, but regardless, they deserved to have their case heard fairly. They of course lost with costs.

The problem was that PM also quite likely believed that they wouldn't win, and was instead using the process to delay plain packaging legislation in other countries such as Ireland who were waiting on the case results. This would be a clear cut case of abuse, and participating in poor faith.

As per what would prevent other companies from attempting the same thing? Fear that the same thing would happen to them. Because of likely abuse of the ISDS system, tobacco would now have no international recourse whatsoever if governments flat out nationalize their factories.
I can see that. It would be rather disastrous. I wonder if that because more military officials seem to be Republican might give them an edge in strategic thinking? They have a majority of the electorate and yet still lose from time to time, mostly when the Republicans give them just enough rope to hang themselves with a few years prior.
Why is this ironic? I could see why this might be labeled a double standard. Not trying to be pedantic here, just trying to understand your point of view.
That's when you do a throat culture. It used to be common 30 years ago. It's simple, accurate, non invasive, and basically risk free.
As an example of what happens when this is attempted, I give you the Mistubishi GTO (AKA 3000 GT overseas, and also Dodge Stealth in USA) [1] According to someone's dogged research it seems that 130K units were sold during its existence [2]. According to an annoyed woman's opinion I heard on the street, "Eeewww it looks like a Ferrari". I know that the cheapest Stealth version sold for under $20K in 1991. The Wikipedia article mentions the various competitors, several of which have strong followings to this day, and of which at least one has been semi-revived. I of course did own one of the cheapest models of the Stealth. I personally consider the most engaging alternative to be the ca-1991 300Z, which was too expensive for me, but still I think a middle-class car.

I think the current middle-class gearhead car is either a full-on Q-ship (it's fast but you can't tell by looking), or a sports sedan like BMW 3xx or Audi A4. Whether that is because no more hatchback coupes are sold or because customers decided to give up hatchback coupes I do not know.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitsubishi_GTO

[2] http://www.suthnr.com/garage/3s-production.html
DACA and the undocumented: that's a legitimate fear. Muslin Americans and Muslins here legally: that's legitimate but I'm confident our institutions are strong enough to prevent something that blatantly unconstitutional from happening.
And for anyone interested in the topic, the article is already out of date, as entrepreneurial parole is currently blocked due to a regulatory freeze: http://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/white-house-orders-imm...
Again, the arguer was+is 551199 and I'm not attacking him. However, he did trot out the odious Dinesh D'Souza and I felt it necessary to put that cretin into his proper context. So I'm not attacking the arguer; I'm attacking his alternate facts.
Wow. That's a huge straw man if ever I've seen one.

I will entertain you, however:

We aren't talking about anyone's "life purpose", whatever the hell that means.

We are talking about having the state (and for a quick reminder, that means citizens producing value, not a magical entity that pulls money with value out of hat) fund people with no desire to create value. Not just people going through a rough time, not people unable to give back, but people who will take, yet willingly not give back. They're free to do live their lives as they see fit within the law, but no one can expect for the rest of society to fund their chosen lifestyle.

If you feel like they deserve income, you can gather like-minded people and open a charity that does just that.

EDIT: Those chiming in with a downvote, I'd appreciate if you explain where I'm so wrong.
"The logical interpretation"? There's not much logical about using the word "always" and expecting everyone understand "currently" was actually meant, when no caveat like "modern" was included.

This gets my goat more on the grounds of using sweeping absolute statements, than any care for the reputation of Republicans, current or pre-1960.
Do we really need site navigation?
Sex bias in breast milk
"I never understood why there's so much focus on the "x years experience in y" in the industry. A solid developer should be able to become fluent in any language and technology within a month or two."

I don't think any developer can become fluent at a new language in 1-2 months. I have seen so much terrible code over the years the compiles and appears to run just fine but with massive performance issues, poor design, unreadable, security issues, memory leaks, etc. etc.

I see learning the syntax of a language to be something like 0-5% of the effort of mastering a language, knowing how to properly use a language really does take years. Although I agree that # of years of experience is not a perfect metric.
The Scion brand was discontinued last year.
You already posted that link, and objections were raised.

> So, the effects of our decisions end up with racist results, yet we aren't racists?

It seems like you use a different definition of the word "racist" to me. What exactly is a "racist result"?

Likewise, you use a different definition of the word "statistics" to me also. Even you don't think it's a great example.
> I, for one, opted to renew my startcom certificate for another 3 years instead.

Wait really? When did you do this? I thought all certs signed by their root after sometime in October or November are all considered invalid due to their shenanigans with WoSign. Not so?

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12787029
> all anyone can talk about lately is politics

Good! It would have been great if this more active participation in the political process started a long time ago, but better late than never.

> The overwhelming response has been not caring

One of the reasons for this is that the focus is usually on the surveillance itself. Humans are bad a risk assessment, and most of the time common fallacy that "I have nothing to hide" is approximately correct. Like smoking, the average person is unlikely to be affected by surveillance in the short term. The accumulation of risk over time is never seen first hand.

I suggest that the important understanding that is needed to evaluate the risks of surveillance is that data never goes away. It's easy to be indifferent when you understand surveillance as an isolated event. Instead, the focus should be on growing databases that allow anyone with access to reconstruct entire lives. Practical demonstrations (like Google's map of already-collected location data) are even better.

> will embrace the expansion of the surveillance state

This is what happens when we allow problematic behavior to become normalized. Unfortunately, the too many of the people that did understand surveillance technology decided to say "I don't see any current risk" and chose convenience and features at the expense of future security.
There are two types of to-do lists
Flu is actually a systemic infection, not s respiratory infection. It's not very treatable, except symptomatically, anyway. If the Spanish flu came back today, we'd have almost as hard a time dealing with it now as we did then.
While it may be true that some Republicans were motivated by economic concerns, I highly doubt all; and, I believe there were noted abolitionists that helped to form the party.
> However, a counter argument is that many of the people that UBI may benefit the most might have jobs that they loathe.

That's not really a counterargument. Suppose you have a job you hate and suddenly you have a UBI. Quit immediately and go find a job you love -- even if the pay is crap, add the UBI to it and it's as good what you had before. Meanwhile the horrible degrading McJob nobody actually wants can either be replaced by a machine or will have to have sufficiently better pay or working conditions to get anyone to do it.
There are a couple more necessary requirements for surveillance not to be a problem: A guarantee that the government will stay good (and not for example turn on minorities) and competency to keep accumulated safe from malicious parties come to mind.
> Lots of ways of life about to go away...

If you're a coal miner and coal mining has been in your family for generations it's going to be a bit sad when that comes to an end, but you know what?

Good. The last thing we need to do is send people down deep into the earth to dig up coal so we can burn it in power plants and fuck up the air so badly that some people actually die from it. China's learning this lesson, and it's about time that America committed to the same. Shut them all down. Stop blowing up mountains to chase after chunks of coal.

Lots of ways of life are about to go away, but this is not new. Think of how many people were involved in the horse business. How many people had to deal with lepers. How many people were put out of work by steam shovels. How many were displaced by factories.

Things change. This is good, because if we don't change everyone's way of life is about to go away when the climate change gets so bad that most of the continental US is uninhabitable, under water, or both.