skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
tl;dr: Quite rare but non-zero instances of vomiting, respiratory distress, or coma, in some cases requiring intubation (which, if you've never had that done, is a pretty annoying intervention, and can cause airway injury), or mechanical ventilation.

From the full report:

"Accidental ingestion of cannabis by young children can result in respiratory failure and coma, as noted by several case reports (Amirav et al., 2011; Appelboam and Oades, 2006; Carstairs et al., 2011), and the consumption of cannabis edibles has been identified as a contributing factor in the accidental death of at least one adolescent (Hancock- Allen et al., 2015)."
...
"among all calls to U.S. poison centers in involving single-substance exposures to cannabis, death was the outcome in two cases in 2012, no cases in 2013, and one case in 2014 (Mowry et al., 2013, 2014, 2015), although the reports do not indicate whether cannabis exposure was a contributing factor in these outcomes. Cannabis was not found to be the main cause of death in any of the fatal intoxications among drug addicts submitted for medico-legal autopsy and toxicological analysis in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, or Sweden in either 2007 or 2012 (Simonsen et al., 2011, 2015)."
...
"In a study on unintentional pediatric cannabis exposure, Wang et al. (2016) described a case where hospital staff members were unable to resuscitate an unresponsive 11-month-old child who presented with tachycardia and metabolic acidosis and who tested positive for THC in a urine drug screen. The authors noted that any relationship between cannabis exposure and the patient’s symptoms or outcome was unclear. Although presented here for discussion, these case reports did not inform the committee’s conclusions on the association between cannabis use and overdose death.

By comparison with the minimal literature on cannabis-related overdose death in adults or children, several studies reported on potentially serious symptoms associated with cannabis exposure in pediatric populations. Le Garrec et al. (2014) reported that, over a 3.5-year period,
seven children aged 11–33 months were admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit in Paris with accidental cannabis poisoning. All of the children had central nervous system symptoms, including drowsiness and coma, and three were intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation for less than 24 hours. Between 2010 and 2013, an Arizona poison control center received 49 calls related to unintentional medical marijuana ingestions among children aged 7 and younger (Lovecchio and Heise, 2015). Among the 39 records with complete information, the most commonly reported symptoms were lethargy (48 percent of cases), an inability to walk (53 percent), coma (10 percent), and vomiting (21 percent)."
I always set my location some way to the south west to make f.lux dim later. Sweden in winter may get dark at 3 pm, but that doesn't mean I am going to bed.
The article is unclear. Walt Cunningham's test was on the 26th, but the fire was the next day: the 27th.
Aren't students with wealthy families literally attending school thanks to the contributions of others? I say this as someone fortunate enough to have parents who saved their whole life to pay my tuition - I understand I am fortunate for that, I didn't literally earn that money in any way before attending school and performing well to justify it being spent, and I still can't argue that in any way is the same as literally working for that money. On the other hand I knew classmates who basically worked like slaves for four years at terrible, thankless jobs, struggling to pay rent in an area full of luxury housing targeted at the wealthy, just trying to pay their tuition after loans and aid. This at a school where Greek house membership fees run into the thousands, literally engineering a class divide in the student social life.

I'd say "constantly reminding" someone and their surrounding peers of the fact that they are of lower stature economically is a recipe to divide the student base and breed resentment. You would be less likely to feel resentment standing in a separate line from most of your peers, looking at a bunch of students with outfits worth more than a month's rent, singled out for getting "handouts" from your school? Don't grad students typically earn a stipend working a job anyway? I don't see that as any more "living on the largess of others" than going to school on your family's money.
I would say that's false. I would put it up around .5kG/1kG as a kinetic object about 4 meters above your head and dropped.

It would likely kill 50% of the population it was dropped on :-D
Actually it is not.

Well, the HBR studies cited, here, indicate a correlation between a manager who could do their direct report's job and job satisfaction of that direct report.

It does not claim that this is necessary for direct report job satisfaction, only that it makes it more likely.

So, my comment could have been better phrased as:

The reality is that in order to effectively manage, it helps if they understand what the doers are actually doing.

If you cannot have a great manager who will get out of your way

I claim that knowing how to "get out of your way" is a necessary but not sufficient skillset in a "great" manager. Understanding how you do your job will better enable a manager to remove impediments and provide you with the right environment (both physical and technical) and right motivators to help you perform even better.

No one would claim that a football coach should try to handle the ball themselves (as per the manager you described in your last paragraph). But a coach that just stands back and lets the players play is only doing half their job (at best).
From experience, chances are you will never work with any of these people in the future. It is possible but the odds are low. So it's not worth it. Even if you stay until production, leaving for another company will always put you in a bad position with your previous employer/manager/team. If you re-apply in 2 years at the same company, sending direct emails to your previous collegues and boss, you'll be shocked about the answers. That'll make you feel like big loser.

Long story short - in business you always move forward.
> CI, TDD, DVCS

Are any of these concepts particularly difficult to understand for a seasoned developer?

I have a really hard time imagining that a C and SVN expert couldn't learn how to use git "well enough" in an afternoon, and effectively within a few days, for example.

In particular, the freaking author of git is an 80's C programmer and SVN expert...
Why mobile app developers may soon be looking for a new job
Keeping an Eye on Your Stack with CloudWatch Events
Flip a coin 4 times, all 4 times the coin lands on heads.

You: "Statistics is bullshit."
Since I started using rem for font sizes I just can't go back to px, I find rem so much better for responsive websites and would recommend it to anyone who did not try it yet.
Ask HN: Why not stop learning and start doing?
How big is your list of things you know you should do, and aren't doing? What's the use of making that list of things you regret not doing longer? You need motivation not education. Discipline is even better than motivation, but it's harder to do. I made a video on my youtube about this.

It makes you wonder why schools are so full of whats, and so empty of whys. Everyone that loves to learn new things is already motivated by curiosity. If you want interested students, you need interesting reasons to care about the subject.

If you find a strong enough why, you will find a way!
Uh, right, people could use one for shopping, one for banking, one for work, etc... but they'd like them all to be in the same window so they can switch between them as tabs... (It's funny when you realize that the old ProfileManager predates tabs.)

Which is where we arrive today with Mozilla's work on "container tabs". The code and UX evolve, too.

I'm not sure what your complaint here is, mverwijs? That Mozilla should test Firefox starting up with the ProfileManager again? Like I said, I think "container tabs" might be a good way to do this in a way that mainstream users might pick up and this will be interesting to watch.

(I guess one trick that might be interesting if there was a way to easily "graduate" from I know/love "container tabs" to "oh, the next thing I can try is profiles to do more complicated things", but I think the answer is that profiles will adapt more to work with "container tabs" UX than "container tabs" UX will adapt to the old profiles UX. Given "incognito" tabs in other browsers can be seen as a specialization of a "container tab"/"profile tab", I suspect mixing profile tabs in a single browser window is a UX that is here to stay.)
Any mature development manager would understand turnover is normal. They would also try and convince you to stay until the launch.

If I were you, I'd just tell some convenient white lie that gives you a good out without burning bridges.

Your top priority should always be you, not the company nor your co-workers. Do what's best for you.
Are you sure they aren't intended for data processing? I've never heard that claim before, and the Go documentation seems to have a lot of examples of using channels in that way. (https://blog.golang.org/pipelines, for example; or https://tour.golang.org/concurrency/2).
You should have, then you could have made a self congratulatory blog post about it and posted it to hacker news!
Weird, vaadin made a compat layer for polymer/angular and it works well. I would expect vuejs would also work reasonably well with proper compat. shim, there is one for vue 1.x.
I'd say technically no, but what is these days?
As a back-end developer who recently made a trip up to frontend worlds I would recommend vue.

Big advantage of vue, that you can just include vue, some component library (like the above, or vue-mdl in my case) and start building stuff. You don't need learn 5 new transpilers and build tools to get the simplest thing done like described in https://hackernoon.com/how-it-feels-to-learn-javascript-in-2... .
This should be a zero trust relationship by design. Instead we are forced to trust the untrustworthy.

Blaming convenient phantoms is sidestepping the problem.
How forza football sends 1.3M notifications in 16 seconds with Elixir/Cassandra
The point I'm making is, Defender is no better than these AV companies as it fails detection tests just as much as they do, if not more.

romanovcode implied that because AV tests are frequently sponsored by AV companies, that would somehow negate Defender's consistently poor results (which would make no sense, as it has poor results pretty much universally across different tests).
As desirable as it is, it's important to realize that a right to one's own wealth cannot be absolute. Since a right to one's own wealth does not say anything about a right to obtain wealth - that is the role of equal chances, equality in front of the law an other fairness principles encoded in modern societies -, it is for itself perfectly consistent with a society that has Gini index 1. That means that only 1 person owns all resources and everyone else owns nothing.

Such a society would be not be just and nobody wants to live in it. The general idea to prevent this kind of barbarism is that additional fairness criteria are needed that ensure that everybody can live in dignity, and only if your wealth does not violate these principles should you have a right to it. Fair resource distribution principally conflicts with the right to one's own property and unfortunately out of the box also with the Pareto efficiency of transfers.
Natural resources that are scarce can be justifiably taxed, but the argument the parent comment paraphrased is not a Georgist one of taxing only land and other natural resources. It is claiming that no form of property rights are legitimate, and that all enforcement of property rights is a violation others' rights.
You underestimate how deep this goes with the actual public.

My father has been in the GOP base his whole life. The refrain when I challenged his views on science was: "those scientists are all liberals. Why should I believe anything they have to say?"

He encouraged me to study sciences anyway because it offered a better life than his. Now, of course, he explicitly regrets providing me that education, because he sees me as "brainwashed."
I hope that you and they are correct, of course. While reading through the information the NY organization had sent, it just appeared that they were less certain than that.

I am very excited. What was strange is that in order to accept the trees, you had to agree to an entire set of restrictions. You can not sell any nuts was one; another was you must cut down the tree if you ever sell your property, I suppose there is an exception if the new owner also signs onto to the agreement. Seemed a little awkward, but still worth it.
Corel Draw X5 Keygen and Serial Number Full Version Download
Why is voting disabled on the parent comment? Is it just me who has that or is it disabled for everyone?
Here's another overused word: passion.
Are you very young (< 35)? If so, then I recommend talking to older people around you and hearing about their life experiences. I've found that the "fear of missing out" as a youth is assuaged when talking to folks whose most amazing life experiences occurred when they were easily twice my current age (puts a lot of things in perspective).

Also try this experiment: on one occasion, actively pursue an opportunity "overheard with friends" - when that activity is complete, recount the entire experience and decide if there was truly something you could have lived without. On another occasion, actively turn down such an opportunity and pursue something in the meantime. If you can do this once, do it again, and you'll start to learn to balance the pursuit of such opportunities and likewise a restraint. As motivation: If you don't turn down an opportunity then you are missing out on this experiment!
Rothschild Family Wealth Is 5 Times That of World's Top 8Baires Combined
I've been most successful in getting reviews and feedback only when triggering a cta at the appropriate time and to the appropriate user. For example, figure out what a valued user means to your b2c product, is it someone who has done x over a specific period of times or logins.

Once you determine that, try showing those users a modal that says something like, are you enjoying "my product", with yes and no answers. If no, ask if they would like to provide feedback so you can make their experience better. If yes, ask if they could rate your app.

I've found that by using this method you, a) show the cta to users that matter, b) get feedback from frustrated users, and c) get positive ratings from people who have expressed a positive intent.

GL
I've been most successful in getting reviews and feedback only when triggering a cta at the appropriate time and to the appropriate user. For example, figure out what a valued user means to your b2c product, is it someone who has done x over a specific period of times or logins.

Once you determine that, try showing those users modal that says something like, are you enjoying "my product", with yes and no answers. If no, ask if they would like to provide feedback so you can make their experience better. If yes, ask if they could rate your app.

I've found that by using this method you, a) show the cta to users that matter, b) get feedback from frustrated users, and c) get positive ratings from people who have expressed a positive intent.

GL
> Heavy use for enough time will get you in a mist of passivity and poor memory. Every experienced weed smoker would have told you so much, a few years ago. Now there's a resistance to concede even that.

depends on what you're counting as "heavy use" and "enough time". also depends on whether or not you still smoke, and how much, and how often.

I don't disagree that there are some values for those parameters that do lead to "passivity and poor memory". we just don't really have a clear view on what the range of effects is across different values for those parameters, and how much variability there is within individuals. heavy use for one person might only be moderate use for another.

the resistance to conceding those obvious points is really just based on ambiguity. yeah, every experienced smoker is familiar with the cannabis haze. the questions are really more about the specifics than the generals.
"We're special underwear for atheists."

Love it
Should rich kids make an effort to help poor kids feel welcome, yes. However, the net feelings of everybody at Harvard should be excitement for the probably awesome future that they have after college and focus on getting the education that will make that more likely.
Less than a gram of swarf or other miscellaneous small sharp metal bits will do you in, so yeah.
I'm always amazed with these stories.

Here in France, and probably lot of places in Europe, a 3-months notice period is required after informing your employer of your resignation. During this period, you finish the things you started, they find your substitute, you train your substitute, they write all the legal papers properly, you prepare for your next job and so on.

3 months can be long but the working conditions become super cool (e.g. 10-4 instead of 9-5).

The same conditions apply if your employer fires you (which is relatively rare, unless you commit serious misconduct). You stay 1 or 2 more months in the company after being informed, so you can find another job before leaving.

(Note: during the first months in the company, you are in a trial period so these rules don't apply. You leave when you want and they fire you when they want.)
There's even a word for it, "humblebrag."
He did say that there's a 2008 Pew study that shows 14% of voters are non-citizens, which is a lie.
Ask HN: How would you quantify the level of stress at work?
Are you stressed at work? How would you quantify the level of stress from %0 to %100?

Take the average of a typical week at work.
That may be, but in many states (probably any place urban or suburban), you still have to worry about getting arrested if you let your kid walk to school or play outside by himself.
Absolutely.

I'm going to sound very self-centered and certainly not humble but when I was enrolled in mandatory education I was doing so under Tony Blair's Labour government. This government was elected under premises such as nationalisation and additionally "Education, Education, Education"[0]. As such no child was allowed to fail school.

This had the opposite affect in my primary school, instead of segregating the children who had difficulties learning or even the opposite- elevating children who were learning well; instead the entire class would slow to a crawl when it came time to do some form of verification that we're actually learning.

In many cases 'tests' would stop any possibility of new content being added to the class for months.

I was bored out of my mind and I'm sure I wasn't the only one. School is an absolute torturous prison when there's no stimulation of any kind; and they also wonder why you seek fulfillment by acting out.

Conversely, before my time there were English Grammar schools which were done away with, those output the most well educated people and were free for the public too. They just had very strict requirements for entry and you could be expelled for not keeping up. A stark contrast to the kids in my class who were unwilling or unable to allow the class to move forward as a unit.

Gah. I hated my childhood and I absolutely hated formal education because of this.

[0] https://youtu.be/kz2ENxjJxFw
Which in a more literal sense means you have amorous feelings toward the thing you're passionate about.
Additionally, he only owns it as long as he can pay whatever property taxes are levied upon it.
A more appropriate word would be "honored".
A lot of todays best practices and workflows...

Why does my boss have to know anything about that? The technical lead or senior developer(s) for each project should be the ones making decisions about those sorts of implementation details.
Perhaps these days people are less likely to be living and working in rubbish dumps.

What are your thoughts on these graphs?

https://twitter.com/Sheril_/status/821356927158484992?s=09
Well, perhaps that means the right solution is not to complain about the language but to switch to Ruby (or Crystal) instead.. :P
Yup you've nailed it, the nuances in a language are vast. Tone,culture, popular media, common jokes add up to a ridiculous combination of possible meanings.
Oh come on! The number of people on the list is greater than the number of years any of those people have been alive. Doesn't that amuse you?
Coincidentally, both are now extinct.
Sure, Facebook's decline is very widely documented and well studied, I've been tracking it for some time here are a few links that are easily digestible:

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jan/22/facebook-...

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/facebook-dying-michael-spence...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3628903/Have-...

http://www.dakinassociates.com/facebook-dying-slow-death/

https://www.similarweb.com/blog/social-media-usage

http://www.business2community.com/facebook/6-studies-show-fa...

http://marketingland.com/facebook-organic-reach-drop-steepen...

http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2016/04/...

http://etfdailynews.com/2016/07/25/potential-facebook-bombsh...

http://www.cnbc.com/2016/10/13/snapchat-is-king-among-teens-...

http://www.smh.com.au/business/media-and-marketing/facebook-...

https://inewsjournal.com/social-media-may-losing-popularity-...

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/30603/20150203/faceook-los...

http://venturebeat.com/2015/02/27/facebooks-active-users-are...

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/facebook-is-losing-its-gri...

http://www.business.com/social-media-marketing/facebooks-use...

http://www.intadvertising.com/blog/2016/5/16/is-facebook-los...

http://www.gamenguide.com/articles/56737/20161019/facebook-l...

http://www.adweek.com/socialtimes/how-much-longer-will-faceb...

http://www.valuewalk.com/2015/02/facebook-losing-popularity-...

https://www.cnet.com/news/why-teens-are-tiring-of-facebook/

http://fortune.com/2016/04/07/facebook-sharing-decline/

http://au.pcmag.com/internet-products/4605/news/study-facebo... (note: 2014)

http://www.econotimes.com/Wayup-Instagrams-Popularity-Will-O... (note: 2015)

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/148829/20160409/decline-in...

http://www.zdnet.com/article/unfollowing-social-media-youre-...

http://www.theverge.com/2016/4/7/11387604/facebook-personal-...

http://growingsocialmedia.com/facebook-decline/
There's probably some CAP theorem of management
Applying Machine Learning to Debt Collection
It seems like MBA schools recognize this to some extent - my brother got an MBA with a focus on software project management. They even had to learn to do some coding and worked on a couple software projects as a team in order to apply what they were learning.
Capitalism and private property are not the same thing. Capitalism is Karl Marx's definition of an economic system where the means of production are private property.

Private property is a more broad concept that means of production. You can put some goods out of market by law (a dam, roads, airports) so society will work better, but that isn't the same as preventing individuals from having their own private wealth.

Private property is based on the concept of rule of law. If the State can arbitrarily disposses you of goods you earned through fair trade, you are not really free.