skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Mercedes also has the CLS and CLA now. LandRover did a model, the FreeLander (LR2 in NA), which was a Ford Escape with a nicer interior and different body panels. The LR2 SUV was built on a mid-size car platform, as many "compact SUVs" today are. They're very much built to American tastes of "some kind of truck thing, definitely not a minivan" while having about the same interior space as a decent sedan / hatch. Because of these tastes, we also don't get many of the hot hatches from Europe, because apparently no one except a few enthusiasts here want a small-ish vehicle with good power, great handling, good fuel economy, and enough room for a mountain bike or two in the boot. Americans want a hatchback with a lift kit, like the GLA45 AMG (since we don't get the lower, better-handling, lighter A45 AMG here) with just as little space, more weight, and much more body roll all for aesthetic reasons. It still has basically no true off-road capability.
There are also some boards, such as the Cubieboard2 and Cubietruck, that have on-board SATA III
No one's looking at this page anymore, but I happened to have the tab open and think it's an interesting question...

StumpWM handles windows a little differently than i3. In Stump, every new window simply piles on top of the existing windows. There's no stacked/tabbed/split layouts to switch from. You switch windows with a fuzzy-matching text-completion thing.

When you want a split, you give a "split" command, either vertical or horizontal. The top-most (ie visible) window goes into the new split, and the next window down the stack becomes visible in the leftover space. Removing a split is another single command. Pulling a different window into a split is another single command.

Almost the only times I want to split windows is where I need to look at something side-by-side really quickly, for whatever reason. In Stump that's one command to split, and another to remove the split.

In i3, it's "create a split container", "move to another window", "move this window into the split container", do what you need to do, then "move this window up/out of the split container", then "move the original window up/out of the split container". I regularly get tangled up in the various containers, and have a hard time getting out of them.

I freely admit I may be doing it wrong, but I haven't yet figured out how to do it right.
It doesn't matter if the US is more or less xenophobic than someone else. It matters that the the US is xenophobic. Just because other countries are indeed racist doesn't make it OK for the US to be.
Or maybe more people would leave their jobs and go to teach? Maybe the local community college would have higher qualified ex industry teachers and it would spread the students around other towns?
Um, no. An ad hominem argument would be if I were attacking 551199's character which I'm not. Instead, 551199 cited D'Souza as a reliable source and I attacked D'Souza's character. See the difference? Good.

I am however, impeaching D'Souza's credibility as a source.
I think that's great, and I agree completely. I added that last sentence because I think at the end of the day your education is what you make of it, regardless of whether you went to school for it or not.
This.

It may take a couple more decades but it really does feel like today's Programmer will become yesteryear's factory worker.

A large chunk of what we're building is rebuilds, or maintenance, or minor upgrades. Every market is saturated. We keep ourselves busy building the same things, solving the same problems over and over, with the latest and greatest "stacks".

Post secondary education is churning out more and more programmers, and the available programming tasks continue to move towards mundane repetition.

I wonder if the new technological revolution you mention will simply be more globalization?

Manufacturing in China will eventually move to "cheaper" countries. Factory workers in today's established manufacturing centers around the world will want a better life for their children, and push them into STEM. We'll lose our jobs overseas. It happened here. It could happen there.

Perhaps it's already happening?
Fair enough, SMA is certainly not awesome for anyone whose kid is dying from it. I should be more measured in the words I choose. "It's a shame that a lab run by a guy who may be an asshole slave driver could negatively impact the perception of SMA research, but if he is in fact playing fast and loose with the facts, it will be better in the long term for him to stop working on SMA, or anything else"
Your default is to attribute something you do not fully understand to racism? To trade folksy expressions, the boy who cried wolf...
I went far enough down the rabbit hole to conclude that the source of the trouble was threading. If that's been fixed, then I'm going to give stump another shot right now.
Thanks for the links. This stands out:

>. The presence of ascorbate induced a 50-75% decrease in minimal inhibitory concentrations of different antibiotics for resistant strains. When ascorbate is added, formerly subinhibitory concentrations of penicillin or tetracycline have an increased inhibitory effect on resistant strains and even induced the death of 25-93% of the initial population. These results suggest that ascorbate can induce the loss of several plasmids of S. aureus, and that the levels of antibiotic resistance are also affected by the presence of this compound.

Vitamin C saved the day again ! This level requires intervenous treatment tho, something considered frindge science at this moment for lame reasons.
It may take way more than 5 minutes.

My experience with let's encrypt so far:

- the name of their tool was changed form "letsencrypt" to "certbot", breaking my cronjob

- for daemons that try to access the cert/key as non-privileged users, additional fiddling with permissions is necessary, which may even be overwritten on cert update if done incorrectly

- when the certs are renewed, daemons need to reload them. This means that ideally, you need to detect when a renewal actually happens (as opposed to an attempt), keep an up-to-date list of all daemons that use the certs and possibly completely restart them, dropping all existing connections (some daemons just don't support a live reload)

I'm not saying these problems are unsolvable, but may take way more than 5 minutes and I, for one, opted to renew my startcom certificate for another 3 years instead.
I don't see why you (or w3schools) would object to a warning being shown on that page. It's put forward as an example, it shouldn't be treated as real and something requiring security, so showing a generic warning confirming it's not secure is perfectly harmless and even expected
"Regulations aren't grounds for an ISDS suit, unless they're implemented discriminatorily."

If a company believes they can sue, and convince a judge ... well, they'll sue.

I get that it's nuanced, but it's a problem, is my point.
If there is a larger supply of well-qualified people who want to teach, the wages for teaching will go further down (supply and demand). I have a little doubt that this is an intended consequence.
>Or like "did you know your house COULD have been ransacked today, but it didn't happen!!"
>Now all my users are going to hear that my site is insecure, when nothing at all changed.

I'm not sure you should be allowed to drive a webserver.
I haven't listened to this episode yet, but it's worth noting that Milton Friedman was advocating for this very position in the 1960s. Here's the relevant clip from Free to Choose:

https://youtu.be/82SG_EpCsVs?t=1524

And a 1968 clip from an interview with William Buckley Jr.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xtpgkX588nM
Well sure, it would be much harder, and even more anti-free market to ban private individuals from setting up their own renewable energy sources on their own property. That would be telling people what they can or can't do on private property, which is a whole other legal ball of wax than telling regulated utilities what they can or can't do.

But utilities would be forbidden from maintaining solar and wind farms to provide energy to their customers. Your interpretation is correct, but it doesn't change any of the things that are bad or anti-free-market about this. I can see how someone might misinterpret the headline, but that requires an almost intentional misreading, regarding a fine point that doesn't impact anything that people are concerned about here.
Link to orginal, more complete article: http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/AC/Foxconn-considers-7bn-US-...

>"In the future they may be paying some $500 more for [U.S.] products, but those do not necessarily work better than a $300 phone," he said, after urging U.S. authorities to provide concessions on land and electricity to facilitate Foxconn's manufacturing operations.

>Despite such U.S. investment, China remains a key market and the primary manufacturing base for Apple and Foxconn, and neither company is leaving anytime soon.

>"Yes, we will continue to add to our investments in China," Gou told reporters. "China is the world's biggest market, and why should we turn down the biggest market?"

>Meanwhile, although Apple's sales in the greater China region declined 30% year-on-year through the end of the September quarter, chief executive Tim Cook remained optimistic about the Chinese market.

This is another piece in the puzzle. For Apple, defending North American market is essential. Starting manufacturing in US might be admitting that it has lost Chinese and Asian markets.

Is China the biggest market as Gou told? For many consumer products and electronics China is the biggest or becoming the biggest market. Surprisingly many products are released first China only.

http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/14/news/economy/china-middle-cl...

>China's middle class is now the biggest in the world, and growing much faster than America's, according to research by Credit Suisse. There are 109 million Chinese with wealth of between $50,000 and $500,000.
Ah finally the disk usage breakdown. As someone who pays for Gitlab hoisting this is a huge deal. We see our usage number climb until the instance becomes unresponsive and no way to find where the growth is. Thank you!
> is excellent because it allows you to increase the housing stock without reducing nominal housing prices and causing existing homeowners to go underwater on their mortgages

So is inflation, and the real estate markets are usually the first to adjust.

Your view of housing is this commodity that's in low supply only because we don't have enough manpower to build more. In reality anyone with a knack for cheap housing can become a proud homeowner in Detroit, Baltimore, rural parts of Mississippi or Kansas relatively on the cheap. Kansas will even throw in some free land grants, so a homeowner and a landowner, living the dream.

People don't want just any cheap housing. They want proximity to their work, in a good school district for their kids, with quick access to transportation, cool restaurants and coffee shops within walking distance. The supply of those will still be constrained.
..based on political views you find odious, rather than directly attacking what you think is right or wrong about the particular (unrelated) statement in question. That is an ad hominem argument.
This is not as bad as it sounds. In fact the answer is in the article:
> Wyoming already generates more electricity than it consumes.
> The state already has wind farms, and a 3,000-megawatt installation is under construction in Carbon County.

People will still build wind farms, they'll just export the electricity. This is no different from Germany going "nuclear free" (they still import energy from nuclear plants in France and the Czech Republic). California is a leader in green energy, of which quite a bit comes from hydro of which CA has almost none...but Washington does. Etc etc.

Still, grandstanding does send a message and this one is a stupid one.
It's probably a price point issue. The latest Odroids have Exynos SoCs with the latest feature set and a price to match. Anything lower market is not going to have the chip IP, internal data bus, and high-speed transceiver IP to support these interfaces because the markets the SoCs were originally aimed at (cellphones, set-top boxes, IoT junk) don't need them.
As it turns out I do the exact same thing with both Reddit and Youtube. I don't click on links/videos, they both just get saved for later. This process takes maybe 10 minutes tops. When I have critical mass (every few days) I'll look back through what I've saved and read/watch maybe 1/3 of it, deleting most of the rest since I know I won't get to it or it isn't interesting any longer.

I think that the layout of these types of websites makes it hard to prioritize; we just instinctually click on the first interesting thing.
I'm in an A/B test group where all pages are marked either green 'Secure' or red 'Not Secure', password or not.

I like it.
I dunno, combining the do statement, the <- assignment operator that I learned from R, and the forM_ monad, I think I could write some good Fortran.

Haskell also appears to have a very interesting form of goto:

https://wiki.haskell.org/Compose#Using_Cont

With Haskell's advanced type system, could we recreate implicit int/real typing, and perhaps even EQUIVALENCE?
If the US retaliated the UK would truly have a "hard Brexit".
It's not really profiteering. Expanding capacity costs money. That's where the money is going.

And what you're getting at is one of the reasons that a UBI is better than vouchers.

Suppose you create a $5000 education voucher and there was previously a school with a tuition of $4000. That is now over; they might as well charge $5000. And if there is a higher quality school charging $10,000 and people whine that the voucher doesn't cover it and have the value of the voucher increased, now every school will charge $10,000, because that is the only way to get the whole voucher and there is no reason not to.

But suppose you replace that with $10,000/year in cash like a UBI. Can all schools now raise tuition to the entire amount? Obviously not, because all else equal people will still prefer the $7500/year school so they can spend the remaining $2500 on whatever they want.
Minimizing entropy: the recycling conundrum
So if some global thermonuclear war started and the US communications were wiped out, the UK would be effectively left defenceless on the nuclear front?
Although if it got to that stage, I guess it wouldn't matter much.
> How, then, can an intelligent person trust a government?

Because that's just the better option. Somebody is always going to gather a lot of power with a big organization.

The choice you get is between an organization whose purpose is to serve the masses (democratic goverment) and organizations whose purpose is to serve very elites (corporations, organized crime).

Regarding your specific point regarding killing people: I think you are oversimplifying here. With the opium wars and the subsequent flooding of china with opium, British trading companies probably already firmly hold the record for killing people on a large scale. For more recent examples, I would point towards the commercial part of the US Industrial-Military complex.

But yes, the government is then frequently instrumentalized to do the actual killing. I would assume this to become harder the stronger and more democratic a government is.
One anecdote here: Both my daughter and son are on the spectrum (high-level autistic, or aspberger). Daughter was born when I was 29 and wife was 34, son three years later (so perhaps a little older than average). Neither was especially premature (both about 5-6 days early from memory) and very smooth pregnancies.

Son was diagnosed at age seven, daughter at age fifteen. Generally it can be harder to pick up with girls. They tend to be better mimics and it can present much more subtly. I really wish we had figured it out sooner with our daughter – she is had a lot of issues with anxiety and school refusal for the last few years, and I wonder if had had the necessary information earlier like we did with our son, how much of a difference it would have made. (Although both are autistic, they present so differently it was not obvious.)

So I reiterate johnnyg’s exhortation to seek a diagnosis and early treatment if you suspect there may be autism at play. There’s a steep learning curve to getting your head around it and figuring out how to best help yourself and/or your loved ones, but you read hacker news, so you’re up for the challenge. Find (or start) a local community support group – it’s a hell of a lot easier than trying to hack it alone.
" Nowadays anyone with enough money to bother can make themselves a 'drone submarine' to track the nuclear subs out of Scotland and to wherever they hide in the ocean depths."

This is not true.

If it were, they'd have been made a long time ago and would be commonplace.
Then another countdown until normal input fields over HTTP are marked as insecure by Chrome.
As an International (not American) citizen who has lived in various countries and travelled extensively, I've made it a point to avoid the US.

Don't get me wrong, the country is absolutely amazing, people are friendly, scenery is outstanding (and this is coming from someone born in NZ). But yeah, border controls are just utterly awful.

I think my first introduction was transiting from Canada to UK via the US in 1999. A very friendly goodbye from the Canadian immigration, then a short walk to probably the most unwelcoming customs I've ever had the displeasure of enduring. But I'll admit, they've been consistent over the past 18 years.

Now that a visa is required even for transit, I've basically just given up and now fly exclusively via Asia. Bonus is, it doesn't get any friendlier than flying Singapore Airlines - and the stopover destinations are awesome.

I've travelled some of the US (not enough) and I absolutely love the country. But yeah, the overzealous security is definitely a turn-off.
Being able to practice what one preaches is a useful heuristic on how authentically one holds that position.
Taiwanese companies such as Foxconn with extensive operations on the mainland may be particularly vulnerable if the Trump government insists on making the one China policy a bargaining chip in trade negotiations. We’ll see how it all plays out, but the worst case would obviously impact Apple and a few other US tech companies.
Basically, if a corporation can say/do things, and then claim it's just their expression and so protected under the First Amendment, shouldn't individuals be able to do the same?

In general, not necessarily in finance; but surely there are fields where certified professionals are liable when something goes wrong based on their advice or decisions (say, accounting or civil engineering).
similarly, x.509 is supported in a variant[0] of OpenSSH. For certain kinds of devices, this may be preferable.

[0]http://roumenpetrov.info/secsh/
As a Puerto Rican, this comment resonates with me. Puerto Rico's shipping industry is closed from competition due to a 1920 law called the Jones Act. It only allows American shipping companies, with American-made ships, to ship goods to and from Puerto Rico. This significantly inflates prices of products sold in Puerto Rico. The Jones Act has created a corrupt duopoly which has been found guilty of price collusion a handful of times [1]. Republicans keep insisting on a closed market in the name of protecting the US shipping industry (which has old, inefficient ships and has little incentive to improve services and competitiveness). I can't stand the free market BS anymore - in the end, politicians will do whatever the $$$ says.

[1] http://www.hawaiifreepress.com/ArticlesMain/tabid/56/ID/1133...
And by manufacturing essential parts exclusively in US where costs are higher, Apple would turn it's back to Chinese and Asian markets, essentially cutting it's growth potential.
Every one was a temp/contract worker
+1 to wolfgke. With BI costs for such mundane work would increase as less people would be inclined to do it. As a result more of such work still remaining in the states would move overseas to the countries with no basic income. That leads to a whole bunch of negative consequences.
> Capitalism is going away, no matter what, once we have massive unemployment due to automation. You think people are just going to accept starvation?

Let's for the sake of the argument assume this is true. But if people really believe this - why don't they stop producing kids (and advocate other people to do so, too)? I find it really crueling to produce children that will have such a useless and crueling life.
In this case it's the people with less money doing the complaining, if I read that correctly. The rural conservatives who are subsidized by taxes on urban areas complain that they are the ones who are getting screwed. That's red states vs. blue states in a nutshell, so it wouldn't be surprising to see the same pattern on a smaller scale between NYC and upstate NY.
The original article is much more informative. Note is has multiple pages.

http://asia.nikkei.com/Business/AC/Foxconn-considers-7bn-US-...
yeah back when heart bleed first came out it took a week and eventually after giving up getting through their call center to find someone who could understand what heart bleed was, i ended up tweeting their vulnerable domain at them. Some reporter spotted the tweet and forwarded it to someone they knew at Telstra.
If i remember correctly it was their Juniper VPN.
Show HN: A travel tool to discover destinations based on your budget
I feel like I sleep better when I'm backpacking. Even though I sleep less comfortable without my own bed, and I might even wake up during the night, I feel much more refreshed in the morning (5:30am). Of-course I sleep before 9pm and am exercising during the day. But just the fact that I have nothing to worry about or think about helps a lot.
Not a Chrome user, but this is a great feature, and is at least moving things in the right direction. Really they should go farther though. The UI treatment is almost un-noticable, even if they went with the "red triangle" version. How about a red-background interstitial page or a modal with a clear "Get Me Out Of Here" and "I Know What I'm Doing" choice for the user?

And for all those "small businesses" that are going to get affected by this? It's hard to muster up much sympathy at this point. It's 2017, and you're still horsing around with vanilla http?
Europe has similar regulation of fleet-wide efficiency.

http://www.unep.org/transport/gfei/autotool/case_studies/eur...

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jul/07/eu-state...
Both of those indicate an increase in price though, which may dampen demand.
I've experimented with lamps and candles for better sleep. It seems devices and television give me sleeping problems more than anything else, even using flux etc.

One really positive change I made in the past is to put my phone in another room for overnight charging. Having
devices next to the bed isn't the best idea for sleep or relationships :)
That very well may happen, and many retirees on Social Security do return to teaching, many consider it a way to "give back".

Considering the Social Security program has been around since 1935, it's probably safe to say that existence of such people for 80+ years did not lead to a decline in college costs.
when did hard work suddenly become "privilege"
What about actually solving the problem instead of tricking the user into believing their data is encrypted while being transferred to you?
If me and my colleagues were better educated and less stressed on average, we would introduce fewer bugs into the system and we would waste less time debugging issues that should never have existed in the first place. I guess I believe that education has a really good ROI.
..which is still a poor proxy for correctness or incorrectness.
Central Europe, unlike central America, does not have Trump as its champion.