skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I don't know if they could have reduced costs as agressively in the 60's. The market was then smaller and making things more expensive (as the world population was smaller and productivity was lower than today). I don't know if this matters though. I'm sure soviet russia could have manufactured space tourist busses in stead of all the nukes and launchers they did as they played by a bit different economic rules. That would have been awesome. Instead we got just an opportunity for thousand megadeaths.
Good. Screw MPEG LA for hampering the development of AV codecs and making free software using audio/video a pain in the ass for a decade.
Patients not finishing the prescribed dose is attributed as an important factor in growing resistance of antibiotics. Though this is anecdonal, I've seen multiple instances of people not wanting to "over-eat" medicine (notwithstanding what doctor told them).

The self-medication trait is quite prevalent, atleast in developing countries, where people think doctors just shove extra medicine down their throat to make money so they self-adjust the dose and stop eating the moment they feel better. Then to make things worse, they never throw the remaining "good" medicine away and self-administer that the next time things get bad. When this remaining "good" medicine doesn't work, they go to doctor again and repeat the cycle.
The income tax depends on throwing those who refuse to hand over a share of the currency they receive in private trade in prison, where they are kept in a small enclosure, and where they often develop mental illness and suffer from physical and sexual assault. It not only blatantly violates one's right to their own property, it necessitates the violation of privacy rights in order to enforce. It is a grotesque violation of human rights and should be abolished.
She describes sex as only happening in infatuation romance. She redefines sexy to something non-sexual. She details laying in bed together and being alone together in a way that most people would call boring (playing a phone game).
No human society in the history of human society has claimed this, because it's ridiculously stupid.
If you want to claim this, okay.
Great, parents can't consent for their children.
Since the document you don't consent to is the only thing that makes it illegal for me to murder you, ..., it's now okay to go out and murder every child, because they haven't explicitly consented.

Instead, of course, we discover that parents in fact, sanely consent for children until those children are capable of consenting or not consenting for themselves.

We also discover the concept of implied consent, whereby people using the benefits of a contract have also consented to the burdens.
At the current burn rate, they will be bankrupt long before the widespread deployment of autonomous cars is a reality. Even if that takes only a decade, good luck finding the funding to keep covering the losses.
پکیج تور تایلند ویژه هتل های سامویی ورود ۲۹ ژانویه ۲۰۱۷
Yeah, I agree. It's not the technology that's awesomest but the economy model it facilitates.
Personally, I've stopped watching video directly on YouTube.

Instead, I installed mpv [0], and since it embeds youtube-dl [1] you can play any video with the native UI by running:

mpv "youtube_url"

[0] https://mpv.io/

[1] https://rg3.github.io/youtube-dl/
You can't just claim my consent. I don't consent by inaction, I don't consent because I was born here. I don't consent because my parents consented for me.

No. There is no consent.
So because GIMP doesn't solve ALL of its problems it deserves nothing? I find this unreasonable. So it's not perfect - no software is - but it's very, very useful, and still deserves support from those who utilize and appreciate it.

btw: I do love Krita, and I'm not saying they deserve any less support in favor of GIMP, but Krita is a lousy choice for certain image-editing routines where GIMP excels. Krita much more tailored towards artists, and I'd rather it stay that way.
Sort of. The Shuttle was reusable only in the loosest sense:

- Most of the launch tankage was discarded after each flight

- Boosters were basically rebuilt after each flight

- Cost per pound to LEO wasn't remotely competitive with 60s vintage expendable systems like Soyuz

SpaceX has a new, simpler and much better design. Even when flown fully expendable, the F9 is highly cost competitive. With the first stage landing, most of the launch tankage and 9/10 engines can be reused.

SpaceX is poised to dramatically reduce the cost of going to space for the first time since the advent of spaceflight.
Modern zoos are orders of magnitude nicer to animals than historic zoos were and far nicer than circuses could ever be. The Asheville zoo, which I visited regularly while growing up, gives the elephants 37 acres.
Here's a test; find a six year old, get the six year old to look for stuff on the web. See how confused they are when the search box jumps to the url bar. See how they react to the clickbait and ads that get in the way of every interaction that they have. See how they struggle with dozens of peoples ideas about page layouts and responsiveness.

Now, you will say : kids are good at using tech, look they are on x,y & z. They know how to do things I don't! But the thing is that they are using services learned one at a time - not access to the library of babel that we all hoped for !

I agree with your post up to the end. The Very happy to stay uninformed too is like "the soviet people love communism". User don't know what is out there that they could get. Especially users don't know what it is that could be made and put out there. This is because tech people don't actually give a toss about HCI and information retrieval, just selling ads and raising rounds of funding.

Don't be evil.
There is literally nothing a woman can write that dudes on Hacker News won't figure out a way to criticize.
I agree I know very little about electricity and current, voltage, amps, all that stuff. I don't really grok it. But code I get. Why are you replying to an old thread of mine here?
The ocean is really, really, really, really big. Also, "radiation" isn't a substance that can be mixed into things like a poison (with the sort of exception of neutron radiation).
How the son of Ireland's richest man lost his job leading India's TATA
The yoga classes helping prisoners in South Africa
You can complain of course, for anything you think is a violation of whatever.
You can vote to change it.
As long as the consensus decision making process exists, is being followed, and you are still taking advantage of the benefits of the contract, you don't have a complaint that you didn't consent to the contract.
You even have a way out.

You seem to have a very very very strange view of what collective consent is.
You seem to think it is "individual consent of literally every member of the collective", instead it is "output of collective decision making process".
You may want that decision making process to be "every member of collective says yes", but that's just one form of collective consent, and at least here, not the one agreed to.

and again, you have your chance to ratify or not ratify the agreements your forebearers have made. If you choose to ratify and adopt, you've consented. If you choose to leave, great, you haven't. You can't have it both ways. You can't claim "i don't subscribe to the agreed collective decision making process but i want the benefits the collective have agreed to".
When I use diceware I use random.org for the dice rolls. They claim true randomness generated from atmospheric noise.
> As someone from mainland China and learned pinyin in grade 1 of primary school, which happened in early 90s, in Beijing, I use pinyin daily, for inputting Chinese into electronic devices.

Do you think learning Pinyin first threw off your early pronunciation of English?

If people learned their languages in unique phonetic characters, would they be more likely to focus on learning the new sounds of other languages?
No. It's not okay, because the children did not consent to be murdered.

Can a parent consent for the child to have sex? Of course not. A parent can't sign their child's life into debt.

Parents can not consent for their children, especially when that consent entails being conscripted into military service, taxed, and being put in prison for possessing a plant.
There's a delight in arguing with someone who understands the commonly accepted positions and can speak to the subtleties and errors in them.

This is the opposite: you seem utterly incapable of understanding basic, well-known positions, and you imagine I am delusional (lizards? really?) when your comprehension fails you.

The state as a concept is not the same as a normal person, obviously. It is subject to different rules.

Something is made just because the governing system that the people have agreed to says it is just. That's the theory that our system of government operates under. You don't have to like that, but you're ignorant if you just say it's false without going and doing some learning.

I am also wondering if you know what a 'law' is and how it differs from 'the text of the constitution'.
If you're claiming there's context to the beating of the elephants in the video, I find that hard to believe.

If you're claiming it's staged, pretty sure Ringling would have had a field day with that.

A conversation is pretty much done when a side doesn't have anything reasonable to say and resorts to ad hominem attacks.
Deploy Rails (production) on your own server
Now you are just asserting things randomly that are false becuase you can't come up with a good argument
Sorry!
This is just "i don't agree with the collective's decision making process, and don't want to have to abide by it, or have to remove myself from it".

Again, the document you refuse to consent to is literally the only thing granting you the benefit of being here.
> You seem to have a very very very strange view of what collective consent is

Collective consent is not a form of true consent. 51% of people in a room cannot decide what the other 49% have to do. That is tyranny, and it's ridiculous to think that the government even has the consent of the majority for half of the shit they do.
It's debatable whether introducing humans into wild animal habitats causes less harm than introducing wild animals into human habitats. Certainly better for the individual animals, but I'd imagine that having a bunch of jeeps running around on safari in the middle of virgin wilderness has all sorts of negative effects on the ecosystem.
That's fine, but when you get the concepts of 'government' and 'social contract' involved, you have be willing to revise that assessment.

You don't get to both 'give away a freedom to the government via the social contract in exchange for protection of your other freedoms' and then also say "hey, it's immoral to not have this freedom; Give it back!". It's one or the other.
It's a relatively common occurrence in New Zealand as well. I often say good morning, thank you and/or cheers to bus drivers.

Ditto for taxi and uber drivers.

I've worked in the customer service side of things before and I liked receiving a thank you with a smile, regardless of how jaded I eventually became.
Not really a fair comparison...
I wrote the tutorial I would like to read. More compartmentalized approach than most that are out there, identifying component and looking at how they work together.

Rails version 5.0 with PostgreSQL running on Nginx with Phusion Passenger.
Except until a couple of sites leak their plaintext passwords, and the attacker can start piecing information together. Bob@foomail.com's PW on Yahoo.com was ZuBrDfPgPg, and on Patreon.com SkBrOxPdGqPgLu. Any chance his PW for Therapy.com might be OxDfGqPdBrSkZu?

Such attack is more attractive and more effective the more people use this specific method.
Sad thing is 20% of antibiotic use is for people, 80% is for farmed animals[1], which sure doesn't help.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antibiotic_use_in_livestock#Un...
Just as an exercise, do you think you can write down my counterargument? It's not hard to see what I'll probably say.

edit: here, I'll help you. For part (a) of this question, list four different meanings of the word 'law', and give an example of each.
For part (b), describe what the word 'just' means when applied to each definition from part (a). (Hint: they are all different.)
Oh, it does? Cool. I didn't think that you could use a widget from one mode in another.
For some negative context on Coinbase, take a look at http://reddit.com/r/coinbase.

It looks like, despite the shiny front and claims, they are still not a solid, trustworthy company, even though they play with a lot of others' money. In particular, the mechanics of their transactions are not obvious (e.g. long wait times), and their customer service is subpar, making some customers feel scammed, with no recourse.
Am glad. There are a subset of desktop users who will happily forsake following the latest s/w versions for rock solid stability, which Debian stable comes closer to than most other distros. At the end of the day, when you use your system as a tool to get (non-s/w dev related) work done, you want stability, and only the latest versions of a very few select packages. I DON'T want the latest kernel or libs because once I install a distro I stick to it for 2-4 years and by that time I upgrade lock, stock and barrel to new hardware. In the meantime I want those 2-4 years to be as crash-free as possible.

Keep up the good work Debain!
No. The document doesn't grant me the right to life. It doesn't grant me the right to own property. Everyone has natural rights. These are described in the declaration of independence and other documents.

You don't have the right to take anything from me just because there's another person in the room. The state doesn't get special moral or justice exemptions just because it's a special type of group.
That's a sub form of democracy called Majoritarianism.

lots of decision making needs higher standards, often watered down later

Conviction for Murder 12 unanimous peers - watered down to 11 of 12 in some places

Constitutional changes - 2/3 majority required in many jurisdictions

As a side note this is why the Brexit result was so devastating, the brexit side won by only a little however the support for being governed by the EU was only 48% .... this needed to be 66% or more for EU rule to be truly accepted
If only tmux loaded my environment and not purify it by design
Content is King and the BBC have plenty of it. All they need to do is allow people to access it via a simple subscription service?
The problem with this comparison is that image hosting services have a really low social and political impact. Ride sharing on the other hand... can't really be a giant Ponzi scheme.
Totally agree with you. So happy to find people like you here. I think of course taxation is indeed theft and indeed most of it is used to commit mass murder overseas to people that are absolutely no thread, in fact they become a thread of they get bombs on their heads, weddings bombed. They become radicalized, I would to if I would live there.

Its not only war, its all kinds of stuff where taxes are wasted on. Sadly the brainwashed people come up with their excuses with BS like "access to society" like society is some kind of concept you have to pay a HUGE entrance fee for to then let corrupt people decide over your life and use it to fight against you (NSA, CIA, FBI).

I am disappointed that true annonymous currencies like DASH, Shadow ... are not taking over bitcoin. I think cryptos should in fact be used to avoid taxes. But of cousrse a big millionaire CEO of a exchange is "Fighting the good fight". Babbeling about he wants the same thing as the IRS that people pay and of course he is all about complacence, what a surprise.

Also I like to quote someone from Reddit about this: "and at a stroke proves the "EU-US Privacy Shield" is worth less than the paper it was written on."
Sorry, I meant Machine Learning. You're right.
Of course not. The point is to see if you have any idea what the words you're using mean.
> "Here, the governed chose to enact a constitution that allowed the government to take taxes"

No. A bunch of politicians composed of lawyers and privileged elites from the various states chose to enact a constitution did.

> "If the governed wish to not be taxed, they have a way to do that too! Pass a constitutional amendment."

If someone rejects the government's claim on their self and rejects the government's legitimacy, then no, they have no obligation to utilize the government's system of law making.
Let’s build a standard library (std) free of C code / dependencies for Linux
I agree with omission of "what she did for her husband". But aside from that, as my ten years are coming up, with two kids, I found the article spot on.

Life is a mess. Find someone that is willing to handle the mess with you.

I believe that people reading this article /before/ getting married and having kids, and agreeing with each other that they see the world in likewise fashion, will end up staying together in a solid and constructive relationship. Having the " traditional" view of romance that Hollywood portrays is more likely to end up in divorce.
>you don't have a complaint that you didn't consent to the contract.

But you didn't consent to the contract. Choosing to stay in a country is not contenting to following any human-rights violating law the majority happens to pass. By your logic, any law implemented through the democratic process cannot be a human rights violation, as long as the citizens had an option to leave the country, since all citizens "consented to the contract" by choosing to stay in the country.

>You seem to have a very very very strange view of what collective consent is.

Terms like "collective consent" are double-speak, and mean exactly the opposite of what they imply. Other terms that fall in this category include "social justice", which blatantly violates justice, and "social contract", which is in no way a contract.
Very cool! One of these days I'll get out there for a launch. Did you come down just to watch it? Must have been need to be with all those other people.
Pinyin still requires curious apostrophes to distinguish between xian and xi'an, for example. I think a hyphen would have been the better choice.
The disconnect between productive contribution and legal, protected status is precisely what is abused by the people in power to extract cheap labor. Cheaper then it should be if these employers were forced to pay minimum wage, follow labor laws and couldn't threaten their workers with taxpayer-funded deportation if they got out of line.

You're targeting the wrong end of the equation.
Same for äöü. Dev hates foreigners obviously
Storm Clouds Gathering did a recent post on his fight with resistant infection:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dy85bNje-Wo

No where near as bad as this woman obviously, as antibiotics did work on his infection.
You can replace the words "a woman" with "someone" in your sentence and it's still true. The amount of frontpage articles without negative comments is probably zero. And it's not all misogyny, a lot of people just can't appreciate the differences between other peoples way of thinking and theirs.
Idris and Coq which have more advanced type systems allowing you to create proofs for you software. There are not many languages that allow this.

And Shen which has a Turing complete type system meaning it is very flexible but type checking may never halt in certain conditions. I do not know of another language with these properties.

Haxe allows you to target absolutely anything and if you miss some exotic it is trivial to allow generation for it. It is also quite mature language with a macro system. Again, maybe MonkeyX compares somewhat but has far less backends and making a backend is not so straightforward.

K and Q and their parent APL which allow you to write the most terse code you will ever see (some make a sport of it).

Forth you can implement in a few hours on any platform and yet is a very powerful language which makes it easy, once you get used to it, to write terse but easy to understand code. This one I would say is, compared to other languages including Lisp, easier to implement naively while still keeping solid perf. There are also lists of minimal instruction Forths which show you how powerful and easy the basic constructs are and how rapidly you can make a toy language.
I already use 1Password with min 20 characters, unless the site has a length limit ><

I was more curious about extending the characters past alpha numeric / special characters, to include Chinese characters as well. That would open up the number of characters required to brute force and probably result in relying on a collision. Until technology catches up.
Can someone flag this comment? I don't have the option.

I had written a proper response but the level of ignorance and apparent hatred displayed in your comment makes me doubt you would have read it.
That's not how it works. If you request h264, there is no 4K option because there's no 4K h264 encoded version* .

Edit: As SG- pointed out, I also cannot read and Youtube is processing 4K h264, but not offering it on the main site. So it's puzzling why they're doing this. Bandwidth is a possibility, but you'd think it'd be consistently applied.

* You can test this using Chrome + h264ify. Which I use because the battery life when watching VP9 is truly horrific, and I don't care how much Google saves on bandwidth by pulling this stunt.
Can you provide any evidence that husbands think that the author's notion that "slogging through the slop of survival together" is romantic?

If she believes it; that's fine. But it's a fairy tale and dangerous to the health of marriages.
gregjor, sir, I ask you, if you had 100's of people applying to your school and you could filter it by a simple regex to remove all the non-serious students from the list so you could pay attention to the serious students wouldn't you use that filter? I'm not saying I won't help people on windows machines. I'm saying their 1st assignment in our school would be to install linux on that pc.
Simple question. No need for profanity. Just seeking further clarification.
That these, probably the most useful Readline functions by far, are not bound to any keys by default is crazy. To me it makes more sense to bind them to M-p and M-n though.
A social contract is not a real contract. In fact, it is in some aspects exactly the opposite of a contract. The term is extremely misleading, and basically invented for propaganda purposes.

A group of people calling themselves the government and creating ideological constructs like "social contract" are still committing a human rights violation when they throw someone in prison for refusing to hand over a share of the currency they receive in private trade.
Consent doesn't happen at anything but unanimous consent in a group. If you decide to vote, the decision to vote must be unanimous. There needs to be a consent on every individual level in order for consent to occur in the collective level. Otherwise a room of wolves can eat the sheep.
Here's one data point: There are about 150 academic AI researchers in in an area of 1.4 square kilometre radius in downtown Montreal.
Right, it effects everyone except the person who donates. The thing i'm arguing against is the idea that the donors are being exploited.
not that.
say my webservers run centos or rh. my desktops are mostly windows. i remote to my webservers, dev or staging or production, to do stuff. and actually they don't have desktops installed.
none of my machines can visit that /apply page then.
if someone runs windows on their desktop and uses vagrant to launch their dev/test instance it'd probably be headless too. windows desktops have ms office and can play direct x games.
unless u want to force people to choose between a linux desktop and not applying. thats ok too.