skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes I do get it, and you're perfectly illustrating my point. That's precisely the kind of defensiveness, glib brushing off of feedback, denial of the obvious, cultivated ignorance, redirection and projection that I'm talking about.

It's not just your use of the word "GIMP" that offends people, it's also the lengths you will go to deny it's offensive and instead lay the blame on your users and supporters themselves, for being narrow minded and easily offended. And also your Machiavellian approach of redefining the meaning of a word to be all about your own project and nothing else, then calling on your users and evangelists to do the Sisyphean task of re-educating the public, commercial and educational institutions that the well known historical dictionary and pop-culture definitions of "gimp" no longer apply. I'm not making this stuff up:

"Basically our approach is to redefine what "Gimp" means. ... If it is a problem in your local area (some areas in the US typically) that is unfortunate, but we need to rely on your powers to explain that we're helping in getting rid of the derogatory interpretation of the term "Gimp"." -Simon Budig, GIMP developer, April 11 2015, http://www.gimpusers.com/forums/gimp-developer/17151-gimp-in...

Year after year, many people give you feedback explaining why it's a problem. Time and again, you deny it, happily marginalize and ignore them, and try to turn it around by accusing those people -- YOUR USERS AND SUPPORTERS -- of being "narrow minded", which insults them and drives them away:

"I seriously doubt that the name is effectively keeping GIMP from being used. And I am all happy to ignore the very few people who are so narrow-minded as to having a problem with the name." -Sven Neumann, GIMP developer, December 12 2004, http://www.mail-archive.com/gimp-developer%40lists.xcf.berke...

I am trying to make the world a better place, by giving you honest feedback like you requested, with numerous citations and quotes of your leaders and users, and asking you to please consider not using such an offensive term, and not accusing your own users of being narrow minded and easily offended, because not only is it sabotaging the potential success of your own project in particular, but it's also an embarrassment to the open source community in general:

"Is there any thought on salvaging the marketing effort and renaming this product so that it can be taken seriously by people and institutions? Also, a big barrier to entry adopting Linux for people is a solid graphic manipulator. The bad branding is causing many people in my art communities around Austin to avoid Linux in general." -Sam Bagot, GIMP user and supporter, April 8 2015, http://www.gimpusers.com/forums/gimp-developer/17151-gimp-in...
> They're not exactly known for jumping onto new things...

Trying out new web technologies that are experimental doesn't count?
Here is video of the automatic breaking feature triggering at night during light rain: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9X-5fKzmy38

The name is good for technical people, not so much for lay people who don't know that autopilots are more like cruse controls than something that completely flies the plane (they have been getting better though). The 40% reduction in air-bag activation seems to indicate the name is good enough while its probably not optimal.
Could someone expand how an email service over Tor helps when the messages you sent to others still go through SMTP protocol (even with TLS) and is stored/relayed in/to unprotected severs?
Yes, and the Babel REPL/CLI can do that transpilation.
> cucked

Can we not do that?
I agree with akytt, though I think there's a more general truth in play that hasn't been noted. Ongoing poverty perpetuates itself, which is why none of the short-term programs in the US have had lasting impact. We succeed, and find a way to uplift a cohort of people from poverty, but we don't address the root cause which would reduce the rate at which people enter into poverty. And so, a similar size group slides in to fill the uplifted cohort's place. When economic circumstances are favorable, fewer people are in poverty. Other times, more. Creating permanent economic booms would be great, but we don't know how to do it long-term.

What we do know how to do is to ensure that youths have the opportunity to learn, grow, and become self-aware before they enter the high-risk period of their adult lives. In the US, the focus is on access to academic education. We don't really address personal growth and self-awareness, except in using punishments to force youths to adhere to rules and conform to a certain degree.

Trill-i-am (GP) argues that perpetual poverty will engender escapism, resulting in drug use and reducing or neutralizing any productive effects of such a system in the US. Akytt (P) notes that the system is adjusted to fit the circumstances when implemented. I propose that on a longer time scale this program may result in a reduction of poverty because individual adults will be more likely to do something productive with their emotional energy and free time. The program puts kids in a situation where they can freely make self-directed choices that can improve themselves or uplift a team.

I have two questions.
I would like to know what the average TV/[non-self-directed streaming] time is for kids in the US and Iceland.
I would like to know what happens to local (adult and child both) poverty rates as well as adult drug use rates in sustained program cities and in comparable non-program cities over time.
Richard Wiseman wrote a book on the subject of changing your luck: http://amzn.to/2jDN04M

Shorter overview: http://www.richardwiseman.com/resources/The_Luck_Factor.pdf
'When a soldier is in combat, they must trust their fellow soldiers with their life.'

They, a placeholder for a set of undefined size. May be of size Null-Set or zero through infinitely large.
That doesn't seem too surprising. E.g. for Tornado, you have tornaduv, a C replacement for the core ioloop running everything.

Replacing hot spots with C is a tried and true tactic. I don't see how django would substantially change that equation.
This is the only network protocol used in Best Korea.
For both. There should be standardized icons on USB-C cables denoting what the cable is capable of doing so that people don't fry their devices by using the wrong cable.
If we believed this argument, there would be no need for Certificate Transparency, which understands that CAs can create certs for any domain -- they've got the keys to do it -- but mistrusts their signatures by default and trusts them only to the extent that their signatures (update bundles, in the software analogy) and logged and seen by everyone at the same time.

I think we can do the same thing for software. Why not try?
The webpack 2 docs are ripe for improvement - I've been making minor contributions myself but there's still plenty to do. Checkout WebPack.js.org
Sidehelm: a pipeline to validate, test, and pull CSV data
You'll need a backend of some sort - a database to store the entries, and some kind of server to serve up your initial HTML / css / javascript files. If you're a big javascript person, node.js might be a good choice. There are TONS of options here though, including probably multiple choices each, for every programming language you can name. But some obvious ones, to me, would be Ruby on Rails, or Grails, or maybe Play. For a database, either Postgres or MySQL would be a fine choice.

Once you have chosen a backend, you'll have to decide how much, if any, "server side rendering" you'll want to do, or if you want to make a pure SPA that does everything via ajax calls to the backend.

This might be of use to you:

http://blog.hexican.com/2010/04/building-a-blog-using-7-simp...
> When will it be cleared for use again?

The south has been using it to celebrate their treason and slavery for a while. Only recently have people started to say "maybe don't use that".
>I suspect that when most people talk about inequality, what they mean is, "a few people are doing really good and a lot of people are doing really bad". If you can lessen or remove the "doing really bad" part, whether through UBI or some other means (progressive taxation to fund other programs, whatever your ideology prefers), then statements of inequality start to mean just "a few people are doing really good" and I think there are far fewer people that are bothered by that.

I'd say the problem with inequality is something else entirely than "some people doing really good" vs "lots of people doing really bad".

It's that there are resources in the world, and some people have way more access to them.

This can hold even when all people are out of poverty: of the potential and resources of the world, still some people could take the lion's share to the exclusion of others, regardless of whether everybody has a house and food on their table.

And this inequality (with the true sense of the word, not mere poverty vs richness) is also related to opportunities and squandered potential (as in: yeah, we all have UBI, but this dumb mega-rich person could pay his way to Harvard, whereas some other with much larger potential -- e.g. smarts, inventiveness, etc-- had to settle for some lesser school, and didn't get as far in their career).
Or saying "just because this drug cocktail appears to reduce incidents of heart failure relative to the weaker drug for patients with a specific condition doesn't mean we should scream at regulators to abandon all further attempts at regulation and start selling all potent heart-related drugs under development over the counter"
The mentioned schools are not "Ivy plus".

> 12 “Ivy plus” universities (the Ivy League colleges, Duke, M.I.T., Stanford and the University of Chicago)
Actually, between PyPi and "The Gilectomy", there two serious projects to get rid of it, the latter with core developer support: https://us.pycon.org/2016/schedule/presentation/2101/

I attended this talk, and it was really great. PyPi is pursuing software transactional memory, which is massively difficult to implement. The Gilectomy approach is much more community oriented, and focuses on the transition.

Put a bit differently: it's easy to remove the GIL safely, it just incurs a non-trivial performance penalty and breaks C extensions, so the Gilectomy effort is around a combination of removing or avoiding that penalty if you're not multi-threading, and smoothly transitioning C extensions. After that talk, removing the GIL looks inevitable.
Um thats where i get my free easy games
If you believe a certain profile of people is more accident prone, maybe people that fit this profile will have more advantage when using autopilot?
Made in Space and Axiom Space Joint Agreement for Manufacturing in Low Earth Orbit
>85% of the time I see military servicemembers mentioned, the male pronoun is used. How is that "denying reality"? If anything, it's overexaggerating reality.
Third International Theory
Wealthy motorists drive more recklessly: http://www.pnas.org/content/109/11/4086.short
I've always been interested in having some kind of tangible feedback on each key. Braille might be a decent solution for at the very least a-z keys.

I'm not sure what you want to do for the rest of the keys, shift for example, you want to annotate the shift key with "⠩⠊⠋⠞"? And other keys like alt, ctrl, insert etc?
How we’re bringing real-time countdowns to NYC’s lettered lines
Southerners still cling to the notions of "states rights" and "war of northern aggression" and other bullshit.

it's a traitors flag. They committed treason to try to protect their institution of slavery.
How the Cyber Insurance Market Will Evolve in 2017
It's a social evolution, sexism, racism, and homophobia are all much less accepted now than they were in the past. Eventually we will get rid of these bad and destructive traits of segregation based on nothing more than looks.

Unfortunately that time is not now.
Wow, such a shocker!
Who would think that a company would integrate their services into each other?
Congrats to the founders, early employees and to the VCs!

Condolences to the rest of the employees as well as customers.
No, i just took education as one possible factor that might be different between Tesla and Camry or Hummer drivers. Tesla Owners have a specific selection bias, its just hard to describe what that bias actually is, so i just took a stab in a direction to get the discussion going.
Thus, point #4 in the article. Did you read it?
DieHappy launches private social media app to make plans and privately share pics
Make plans through an easy to use date polling feature, group message and upload photos into one place and share privately. Includes a timeline of all of your life moments, option for photo books, etc.
You should really read the report. It's comparing Tesla TACC to Tesla TACC+Autosteer. Aka the safety increase when going from Level1 to Level2. It doesn't have anything to do with being safer than human drivers.
Not sure about Tesla's, but many others are completely disabled or say specifically not to use them in poor weather conditions.

You have to look at what they're using for this, it's cameras with computer vision and radar. Radar has reflection problems like all hell at ground level and computer vision using cameras is generally piss poor (hence why you see videos of the Tesla hitting reflective objects).

It's a miracle that they can do this well using it IMO, even without adverse weather.
I believe, the distinction that orclev mentioned was that in Rust, you specifically have to be aware when something is allocated to the stack or heap, but in Go, you don't have to since the compiler deals with it. Obviously Go allocates to both stack and heap, it's just that the user doesn't need to know which.
There is zero chance I'd stay awake behind the wheel of a level 2 or 3 vehicle.
> It's a demonstration of how powerful a good propaganda campaign can be. 80 years later and still swastikas=bad.

Yes, 60 million dead is powerful propaganda.
It would be one thing if schools in all parts of the country were held to the same standards with regards to segregation. I bring it simply because the article mentioned the landmark ruling to segregate them all while ignoring the one fact not mentioned, it applied only to select states and mostly Southern states. Segregation has been alive and well in the North and even Malcolm X called them out on it.

The number of highly segregated schools still exists and even the constant hammering of acceptance and "quotas" reinforces the that like people NEED to stay together. So why wouldn't voluntary systems like Facebook merely play that out? Groups are stronger than individuals and the easiest group identification is one that can be seen.

Recent political groups are an example of a media telling us its not only okay to segregate but that some groups must (think #BLM)
You could use OpenShift of Redhat or a similar product.

But the simplest idea is to host your own Web server on your own computer. Install a Bitnami Lamp server and observe how it works, before making any modifications. You will access your local Web server with any browser at http://localhost

Bitnami lamp is a cool product:
https://bitnami.com/stack/lamp
Views from the 6 weeks in hell I spent rewriting bumpers in react
Though this is really just giving people the opportunity to down vote me twice, I feel the need to expand on this:

The war on self-determination, and promotion of the notion that you're not really responsible for your lot in life is an ongoing narrative. Basically the introduction are always the sanest arguments: There's a history of racism / sexism that people are still struggling to overcome. The benefits of having a safe society with infrastructure. Of course the implications they then allude to are that if you question the wisdom or effectiveness of any particular conclusion or prescribed policy they advocate for, then you are racists and hate public roads (this should sound awfully familiar to any libertarians). Also the hypocrisy of saying that others are just ignorant of all the hidden things that helped them succeed, while also ignoring things like single-motherhood and having large numbers of children as being obvious causes for failure (both for the parent(s) and children) is particularly glaring.

What it comes down to is basically not wanting those who succeed to feel like they are in any way superior to others, by giving all credit to institutions that the modern neo-marxists (who now call themselves progressives) support (such as public school systems), while also not wanting those who fail to feel like they are in any way inferior to others, by giving all credit to institutions that they dislike (like law enforcement). Also the benefits of institutions they dislike are also completely ignored (family, religious communities, etc...)

Make no mistake, this is a lie meant to justify stripping you of your individual freedom by asserting that you are not in fact an individual capable of any sort of self-direction, but a predictable causal robot of the society in which you live. The continuing inability of the social sciences to make reliable testable claims is merely in an inconvenience to their demographics as destiny mentality. That such an ideology, which attempts to shackle you to easily sorted "identities" bills itself as transcending these barriers, is some sick form of double think that is now spread as gospel by public educators (the priestly caste in this faith that refuses to admit that it is one).

I urge those of you who are have children, and are concerned for their well-being to make sure you expose your children to the insanity of this philosophy in the same way that you would seek to vaccinate them from the virus of religious BS. Because make no mistake, if you don't tell them about it with the appropriate criticism and skepticism, others will do it for you, but in an attempt to sway your child to giving up their self-determination to a nanny-state, and embracing a perverse view of justice called "social justice" where the individual reaping what they sow is of no consequence, and all that matters are peoples not people.
I've filled out multiple hundreds of pages of visa and immigration forms, and I have never had to tell them what religion I am. Barring the use of country of origin or other specious proxies for religion, the feds still have no idea what religion I am.

Heuristic searches for muslims definitely exist - but they aren't as simple as you make them out to be.
Commodore 64 is more likely
It's a nice program and I can see it being both helpful and harmful. From my perspective, as a teacher of mathematics at a community college, students are unwilling to engage in thought about a problem. If they can't see the solution in a few minutes then they want to look at a complete solution. Mostly they are not willing to struggle through a problem.

I vacillate on whether, with the advent of computer algebra systems, it is necessary for students to master algebraic manipulations. I started to think that conceptual questions are better.

For instance, give me an example of an equation with no solution. Explain how a baseball player can have the highest batting average the first half of a season and in the second half of a season but not have the highest overall average. Draw the graph of a function defined on [0, 1] but has not maximum or minimum.

Students can't do those types of problems either. They are very frustrating problems for students because it requires you to really think about what the words mean and to think of extreme situations. So I've reverted back to the traditional style of teaching math. Manipulation of symbols.
How to Rock a Side Project When You Have No Free Time
Varying insurance rates based on age and gender seem to indicate that, yes, demographics play a role in driving responsibility.

A Tesla is not a cheap car. I kind of suspect the average Tesla driver is more responsible than the average driver. It may be the case that the average Tesla driver is very well off, and treat the cars as expensive toys though, so it's tough to say without numbers. If i had to bet right now, i'd bet on the more responsible side though.
They have a very strong web team. In fact, they are contributors to things like D3 and other big JS libraries.
Makes sense, but its still interesting how the result would change when applied to the general population. Would VW Beetle drivers have the same reduction?
Google’s Sergey Brin ‘Surprised’ by Speed of AI Advancements
As a teacher I would kill for something like this, even if it's entirely paper-based instead of digitized.

As you said, creating something like this is incredibly time intensive. There is a reason lots of free and paid teaching resources are basically worksheets, a textbook, and an answer key for "documentation." Anything more complicated is so much work.

Even if you knew exactly what you wanted to do and how you wanted to implement it, you still have "beta test" it with students, determine the space of possible errors and misconceptions[1], make corrections, etc.

I've thought about creating something like this for science, but I "only" teach the same lesson 4-5 times a day. Anything I learn, any corrections I want to make have to wait until next year when I teach that lesson again. Then if those changes don't work or I realize I need to take different changes, I have to wait another year to make them. Not exactly rapid iteration.

[1]Not quite as easy as you might think. Students usually can't explain their misunderstanding very well or at all and you probably understand the material too well and it's hard to understand how to solve the problem any way but the correct way.
I just bought one recently.

Worth it. Heated seat alone... so good.
I am assuming lastpass have the logos on their domain. if the request goes to google.com then its fine as long as the referer isn't sent.
"I remember the furore when Intel introduced a unique CPU identifier in the Pentium 3. Now they have a microprocessor and OS running as a computer subsystem on every Intel server and laptop which is able to do pretty much what it likes with your system and people don't bat an eyelid."

20 years ago most people would have sued anyone revealing to the world what they and their kids are happily telling on Facebook today. Give them some more years and they will pray to have a SWAT team guarding their bedroom when they're sleeping.
Well I try my hand at stand-up comedy on the weekends, even got a few chuckles a few times, so no worries there :P
I'm clarifying what I'm 99.99% certain OP meant by his argument.
Does this include DOD? I suspect DOD is probably already doing this, but just wonder if they fall under the umbrella.
By definition, a UBI must be insufficient to finance a middle-class lifestyle. It provides an income floor.

The most important effect of UBI on the poor is that it gets rid of the welfare trap. Even the poorest paid part-time job will increase your income. At the same time you can walk away from a shit job without becoming destitute.
Also a good point. Low margin doesn't have to mean unsuccessful. But it's taken 20 years for Amazon to get where it is. Uber's valuation seems pretty premature. Amazon lost money for years because it was building infrastructure. Uber is losing money because it is subsidizing its sales. Amazon may have been low margin, but I don't know that they ever took investor money and gave it directly to customers in the form of price subsidies.
It's like Russian Roulette with your code. Maybe something will break, maybe you'll get off easy!
I think it is reasonable to assume that Tesla TACC is not less safe than Tesla non-TACC, therefore the conclusion is also relevant to comparisons between Tesla level 0 (entirely human-driven, no assist) vs. Tesla level 2.
Thank you for your reply. That does help out some.

I hope you appreciate the joy of customers demanding to give you money, and what it means to your business. :)
For those of you who are ML experts - what do you think?