skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
We tested their engine back in 2013, it had an offset and a timer for the coolant temperature. So if you waited long enough between the test cycles the timer would run out and the actual coolant would be relayed to the ECU which would then run a different calibration. Its a joke but diesels unless they have major after-treatment systems just cant run that clean - as they become hotter (read: more efficient) they produce more NOx.
More than just a trend, a lot of these came from the same photo shoot.

https://www.dreamstime.com/photos-images/top-view-office-des...
TBH, I might have used something else entirely, but I had a Roku hooked to my TV which I've been completely happy with for the other channels it provides, and so Emby won out for me because it also has a Roku channel.
No.

First, like CT you want an ecosystem of logs.

Second, you have caching and in-band exchanges as means to mitigate some of that.
That's a completely orthogonal issue. I'm curious how you even came up with that post considering the thread context.
i don't understand all these time tracking apps to the seconds/minutes. as a consultant/freelancer don't you value your time and skills more than on the minute at the desk working? how do you incorporate thinking about problems when your taking a shower or sleeping or the many other times you are not at your computer or desk without a timer and thinking. i find these can be some of the most valuable times there are for solving tough problems.

ever since i started charging day rates, life has been so much easier. i set a minimum of 1/2 a day increments. 10x easier to manage, and it stops the client from looking at you as a cost center that they are loosing hourly on. it also stops the micromanagement of your time. estimating work is hard enough, tagging hourly on stuff makes it even harder. a day then can be as many hours are you like it to be. weather you end up working 12 hours or 4 is up to you and how well you get the work done. if the client is willing the pay the day rate for the problems you are fixing, the hourly time you spend no longer matters.
Why wouldn't storing energy by dragging a train uphill work? It's basically the same as pumped hydro storage, and that's being used right now.
Exactly. I imagine people are moving towards Apple more than they ever have. Though the author neglects to provide any actual data proving either way and rather assumes all share their narrow view based on headlines. Apple doesn't update Mac hardware and software for developers in the way have in the past, but developers are small subset of customers so make of course sense they should be focusing on their main massive customer base. Developers assume MBP to mean meant for only Pro users, but imagine (Without data), that even most Pro customers are not developers/creatives, and rather normal consumers who want the best or bigger screens. As a developer and designer, I would love if Apple were to focus more on our needs, but more importantly, I want them to do what's best for their business so that will be able to continue to produce solid products as no other option comes close to what the Apple Ecosphere can offer currently in my opinion, Linux and Google included. But we all have our own needs some for those that don't like Apple's direction, like the author, glad they are finding other options they find more suitable.
Very interesting, down right thought provoking really if the study holds, much like Godel's incompleteness theorem, in a sense.
Top 40 Software Programming Books
I read the "us" to mean something ranging from "readers of this blog" to "elite tech/science people". Wherever it lands between those two, his assumption that serious academic or ideological interest in theology among that audience is in the minority (and declining over time) seems fair.
They could easily heavily penalize any website delivering over 1mb of html + css + js, and have a bonus for being under 500/100/50kb total as part of their pagerank.

That would be a huge driver... if nobody with over 1mb of html+css+js would be in the top 5 results, period.
In the case of SHA-3 it's particularly ironic that the desire to avoid a monoculture in designs led to a monoculture in designers.

(The authors of AES had one of the few submissions that was very different from AES and this was a large factor in it getting picked)
> The supervised elections were by US, UN or similar groups, not by Palestinian government.

How exactly does such supervision help? I.e. let's say someone votes (under supervision) today against, and then, killed tomorrow for being in opposition. You get the idea. Supervision has zero value when fascists control everything.

Estimating by Egypt situation, around half of the population supports fascist groups, and half is against. Hamas is a projection of Egyptian fascists, so the picture can be similar.
Unfortunately we do run into these types of "robustness issues" in our experiments. They're rare enough that they don't really change many of the performance metrics of the system, but they are quite embarrassing. It is currently a bit of a mystery as to why they go so wrong, better diagnostic tools are sorely needed. Informally, these mistakes similar to the more well-known mis-classification of noise issues in cnn's for vision.
And then they'll send out their slave raiding parties to compel people to work for them.
Did she go on to say all was well in the scientific community?

Judith herself obviously has quite a backbone and seems to be able to take this environment on, the more important point is: is there some truth to what she says? Is there in fact a lack of complete honesty in the scientific community, are some people "strongly encouraged" to not say certain things whether not it has a solid grounding in science?
That's like saying you decided to stop trusting doctors about cancers, because you saw a TV reporter talking about chemotherapy and it was clear he didn't know anything about cancer.

And I'm not sure what you mean by "dishonest", because I think the mainstream media's position is roughly "If we don't cut out fossil fuel we'll be in deep shit pretty soon (say, before 2100, probably sooner)", and it is a statement I think >90% of climate scientists would agree on.

(Actually, I think many would argue we're in deep shit now. E.g., massive reef death in Australia.)
The author here, with a quick note: This NPM package is ideal for pre-loaders with dynamically loaded content, lazy-loaded images, etc.
> With Rust you say 42.

This is, strictly speaking, not true. Rust is an "everything[1] is an expression language", and so if you have some sort of block, it will evaluate to its last expression.

But if you want to do an early return, you must write it, or if you don't like the default Rust style, you can write it.

This is consistent with other languages, just not C.

1: not literally everything, but most things.
The Go ssh library works fine over unix sockets, and you can easily customise auth, so it is pretty easy to make quick custom clients and servers with it.
If you can provide hard evidence that support your perception, I'd be interested in looking at it.
Jenkins is pretty good, by which I mean that it's ancient software and deals in XML and is hateful, but there's nothing better I've found. If your needs are:

* self-hosted

* cross-platform (Mac, Win, Linux)

* tasks run on an agent and get communicated back to the leader

* plugins for managing an AWS fleet or running tasks inside Docker

.. then I think there's nothing else that has the full featureset. GitLab CI seems close. I liked the look of drone.io a lot, but requiring Docker for tasks means that I can't test on Windows machines.
Because the system is asynchronous, you have to have a persistence server somewhere -- think email, not P2P. Since everything needs that server to work anyway, it's doing double-duty as a relay server. Each endpoint pubs/subs, and the mutual server handles the rest. So for example, when I was monitoring my home server from my flight over the holidays, all traffic was passing through hgx.hypergolix.com.

But it's specifically designed to use as many relay servers as you'd like, at the same time. So if you're worried about uptime, you can run your own servers. You do that like this:

hypergolix config --addhost HOSTNAME PORT TLS

So, when I'm at home, my laptop will get updates over my LAN home server, in addition to hgx.hypergolix.com. Not only is this more reliable, it also reduces the receiver latency (sending latency is unaffected, because it's still pushing upstream to both servers).

LAN discovery (of both services and actual users) is planned but not currently supported; there are a whole host of P2P operations that Hypergolix is very well-suited for, but that haven't yet been implemented due to time constraints.
To answer my own question, without the Digital Service, I would estimate that:

* Existing agencies would struggle to assemble a talented, motivated critical mass of software developers. Why? Attracting these kinds of developers requires cultural shifts and 'economies of people' (to riff on the term 'economies of scale'.) It also requires a concerted effort on hiring and knowing how to slot skilled technologists in government pay scales. Not all (few?) agencies have figured out to make this happen.

* Existing agencies would likely continue to procure work as before; e.g. through a maze of procurement and perhaps through some (limited, if any) internal development resources.

I would welcome a continuation of this line of thinking from those who have worked closely with and/or observed the USDS.
Toronto’s mayor tries to improve transport
End-To-End, Continuous Spark ML and Tensorflow AI Data Pipelines
If you go by number of sold copies astrology is still going strong. Doesn't mean it's good.
OP here.

I'm glad you shared that article! I didn't know about the Test Pyramid concept. I'll share this with my team.

You're right, a part of the issue was that we had too many acceptance tests.
Great comment Chuck! Just wanted to add, as someone who is an avid armchair debt/creditor law junkie, that private student loans can not garnish/attach to social security, but federal loans can.

That's a very important distinction, because in a lot of states, social security and other government support benefits are verboten from garnishment. The only two federal garnishments against social security that can occur are for federal taxes, and federal student loans.
Four load testing mistakes developers love to make
[disclosure: GT CS alum]

>Andrew Ng's Coursera class on Machine Learning was the pedagogical highlight of my time at GT, and I did it on my own initiative (and it's free).

This is something I wanted to highlight from your post. I don't think this is surprising, nor do I think it is reasonable to state that a course (or a degree program) is poor quality because it didn't meet the standards of Ng's ML course. That is an exceedingly high bar.

Its something I noticed, because I am a recent grad, so while I was in my mid-level courses, and had recently taken Tech's intro CS course, I was able to watch (Harvard's) CS50 and other courses. But on the other hand, I've seen some very bad online courses. The successful and large online courses are successful and large specifically because they are head and shoulders better than the rest. And there are a lot of decent online courses, so to measure against what are some of the absolute best online courses is to measure against courses that have more resources, more planning, and more feedback than most.

(as an aside, they also have more incentive to be good, but that's a bit tangential to the point that they also have more opportunity to be good).

You type in "Machine Learning" on coursera and you get over 1000 results (not all of which are relevant, but assuming even 10% are), its little wonder that one or two are going to be better than the even the best courses that you'll take during a bachelors or masters, because Coursera offers more Machine Learning courses than most people will take in their Bachelors or Masters.

Combine that with these courses coming prefiltered (you've heard of the Stanford Course, but what about "Applied Text Mining in Python" from UMichigan, which for all I know might be great, but it doesn't come with the hundreds of recommendations that the Ng course does, so I don't know that it will be great) and you have a really great recipe for a bias against the in person courses.
There's a big difference between "a best selling book", and "the most widely distributed and best-selling book in the world."

And I was not addressing whether people think that studying the Bible advances technology/science, but whether people think that studying theology is "crazy" or a "waste of time".
Uh.. they've already _bought_ the car. What percentage of people will return a car due to a little lag when adjusting radio stations?

e-commerce findings from a major retailer are, alas, not applicable to every domain
LinkedIn got a new look(2017)
How Liskov Substitution Principle Can Save Your Classes
What are the implications of this?

Get a /service account key/ and download the generated JSON file.

The service account key is used to verify client OAuth tokens.

/from here:/ https://console.developers.google.com/apis/credentials
True, but that's aside the point. React, along with others, exists to solve an architecture problem that regular HTML/CSS/JS is notorious for.
You're right, compiler writers wouldn't want to be responsible for system security in the same way that OS kernel authors are now, and commercial closed-source software doesn't fit well with the scheme I describe.

If Mill can drop the cost of context switches down to the point where they're indistinguishable from function calls, then that's pretty awesome and it would presumably work well with the software we have now, which is a strong point in its favor. (I haven't seen any Mill talks about security/memory protection, so I don't know what the implementation details are.)

I'm just trying to make the point that reducing the cost of context switches isn't the only solution, and that we could eliminate context switches altogether by making different tradeoffs. I think both approaches are promising and will appeal to different audiences.
What happens when another 1999 happens with three straight years of 20-30% declines? Or a 2008 where there's a nearly 40% decline? It takes several years of double digit gains to recover from these declines, and both of those happened within a decade (and we are not even a decade out from 2008).

Point is, investing v. paying off debt is not a simple matter of average expected growth compared to interest paid on loans. Investments often lose large portions of their value in the short-term while paying off debt is always a guaranteed return. So, for short loans (<15 years), it's probably not wise to use average expected return, instead use a wide range of +15%pa and -30%pa.

I'd argue the fact that you've beaten the average expected yearly return for so long suggests that a correction is imminent and paying off debt has a better expected return than investing. This goes doubly because so many people have forgotten the lessons taught by past recessions and believe that 10%+ annual returns are the norm.
Oh crap, sorry it was down; got it back up and running. Try it out!
I concur, but I'd rephrase it like so: It's not just against the law, it is morally wrong.
Ivan, Thank you very much for this comment. I have been struggling to communicate similar problems related to scale in the biological sciences. The methodology needed to discover something new is far too "specialized" for the techniques used by the "majors" to be economically viable. I have been pushing for a specification based approach and your account here is the perfect articulation in support of it. I was lucky enough to spot the Mill talks when they first appeared and have been following along from the sidelines. I will keep cheering and look forward to more progress. Best of luck to you and the whole Mill team!
Maana | Belevue, WA | Full-time | Data Science, Senior Software Engineer | https://www.maana.io

Maana has pioneered new knowledge-centric technology that accelerates knowledge discovery to increase profitability.

We are big fans of functional programming and build our application in Scala, Haskel and cpp.

http://app.jobvite.com/m?3wv6niwh
Rising morbidity and mortality in midlife among white non-Hisp Americans
Why are you using ℅ ("care of") instead of % ("percent")?
I think you miss my point/question.

Have we ever looked the discussion from a different perspective?

This is fact: Atlassian tend to leave the acquired product alone.

This is question: These products that Atlassian left alone, why are they not growing according to (_yours_ assumed) potential? Have we ever asked that perhaps the people behind Hipchat maxed out their potential? Or perhaps the drive is not there anymore?

What I'm asking is this: Did Atlassian do something destructive after they acquire the company? or perhaps the acquired company just simply can't live up to their potential (for any reasons except Atlassian pushing their management to the acquired company).
So what's the take-away? Make many high risk bets in hoping one will pay off?

Newton is an exception as well. While his biographers down-play his failures, he is also credited (at least in High School Physics) with things that were the work of dozens or even hundreds of scientists - or giants you might say.
GenAsm for the factorial function (conAsm in a different reply, above):
define external function @fact w (in w) locals($3, %9, &0, ^6) {

label $0:

%1 = sub(%0, 1) ^0;

%2 = gtrsb(%1, 1) ^1;

br(%2, $1, $2);

label $1 dominators($0) predecessors($0, $1): // loop=$1 header

%3 = phi(w, %5, $1, %0, $0);

%4 = phi(w, %6, $1, %1, $0);

%5 = mul(%3, %4) ^2;

%6 = sub(%4, 1) ^3;

%7 = gtrsb(%6, 1) ^4;

br(%7, $1, $2);

label $2 dominators($0) predecessors($0, $1):

%8 = phi(w, %0, $0, %5, $1);

retn(%8) ^5;

};

Higher-end Mill models have more and bigger things to encode, and so a given program will occupy more bytes than it will on a lower-end member. Thus a belt reference on a Gold is 6 bits, but only 3 on a Tin.
Honda isn't a tire or windshield company either, it does not prevent them from ordering high quality tires or windshields...
if you truly want to understand the mind of who say they have any believes, read le noir et le rouge from stendhal. (might have the color in the wrong order).

but that novel pretty much describe all my theological friends. as much as they cry in denial.
Question: Why do you not then just switch off the AMP support and stick with responsive pages? It sounds like you just generated an A/B test with some pretty easy-to-interpret results.
Yeah, I literally laughed when I saw this. I worked at Goldman Ball Sachs for a little while. Tell you what, you will get discriminated by management if you don't have ivy on your resume. I have had a md talking straight to my face that he thinks I am lucky to get this job because the people around me all graduated with a phd from Havard, Princeton and Yale. I don't even give a shit.
Interesting discussion, although I disagree with the conclusion.

I don't think betting the house on a single event is "insane". Businesses make these all-in bets all the time and we're fine with it. Every Hollywood blockbuster is also a billion dollar all-in bet, but nobody bats an eye at that either. Individuals bet a huge percentage of their net worth when they buy a house. Yet when a person invests a large amount of their net worth in a single stock it's suddenly irresponsible? Hogwash.

The way we perceive risk in society is extraordinarily polarized. Some moderately risky behavior is considered normal, and other moderately risky behavior is deemed "insane". I don't think there is any rhyme or reason to it; just a matter of arbitrary cultural norms.
How is that a spiritual question? More skeptical.
You don't have to use JSX if you're a purist - but why? JSX is just an easier way to write React components.
I am just trying to say that if someone uses the tax break to pay off a portion of debt or to pay for bills and not have to get a payday loan, it doesn't have the same immediate effect as if they go and buy a dishwasher. Yes, they end up paying less interest on their debt over long run, which gives them more money to spend (or save). But these gains are realized in there being less interest in the monthly debt payments, and I think in this case the gains are more likely to be saved rather than pooled to make a large purchase.
schwarrrtz is right on. But also, you have to consider that the new, conforming cars are very likely to be replacing cars that were much more harmful in terms of pollution.

You can argue about the balance of increased energy and materials consumption of a new car vs continued operation of a more polluting older car, but given the march of time, the older car's replacement is inevitable. So then it's a question of WHICH new car is going to replace the shitty old one-- is it going to be an (a) efficient, compliant vehicle, (b) a gas-guzzler and pollutant emitter, or (c) a car that pretends to be compliant but is a horrible emitter.

The outrage comes when people think they're replacing their crappy old car with (a) but end up with (c).
Flickr – A Year Without a Byte
It's certainly not one because almost no one I know, even the highly educated, form opinions mostly on "assessing facts".

#2 is closer to it, but it's not completely clear what you mean so I can't say whether I agree or not.

Take for instance:

"Men are an oppressed group: True or False"

To me, that seems to be the question you are asking (pardon me if I'm wrong or putting words in your mouth). To me, that question is worse than useless.
what changed exactly? sry if it might be obvious but the profile page seems to be the same as ever
> There is a return statement; it just can't return anything

What? Return works exactly like it does in C, it's just not required as much.

> warning: unnecessary parentheses around `if` condition

I'm confused about how reducing the amount of required syntax is "gratuitous syntax."
Now that I know that not all of what you've written is meant to be taken seriously, I really have no idea what point you're trying to get across, aside from some vague pro-Israel, anti-Palestine thing. My mistake for responding to a message ending in ":-)" in the first place.
http://openmeetings.apache.org (isn’t fixed to this release either, but still a better link)
that's called a static site :-P
I agree that latency and detail of feedback is an enormous problem with this sort of partially-guided coursework. However, it's a generalized problem with higher education, not specific to GT, in that when implemented effectively it's one of the most valuable education experiences but difficult to scale, because it demands time-consuming supervision.

This is especially true of term project courses, where the final portion of the project to which you devote the most time and creativity is also the part for which you're likely to receive the least feedback.
These comments are proof we've been in a bull market far too long
But that's pretty much true of all the curves of that vintage, right?