skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This was described in depth in a recent Nova program called "The Nuclear Option"[1][2]. In it they referenced multiple other more safe methods than the most common type of reactors in use today which use technology designed decades ago. Sodium based reactors were new to me entirely and appear much more safe than existing designs, also capable of using depleted uranium.

Note: I'm not a nuke supporter just a curious guy.

[1]: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/tech/the-nuclear-option.html
[2]: http://www.pbs.org/video/2365930275/
Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Pakistan, Philippines, Somalia, Syria, Yemen

Source: http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2014/sep/25/...
that approach comes with its own problems regarding privacy.
So if we're at only 3x the cost for SSD, how many years until HDD cost parity is reached? 5 years? This seems like a sensible guess to me.
I noticed that in long walks in the city my fingers swell up, so it's definitely the blood circulation. Maybe my thin fingers make it worse.
I'm genuinely curious, how do you go about executing this? Not everyone will consent, so how do you selectively apply those services? In the winter, I pay for snow plows and salting the roads, but my neighbor doesn't, so...?

I am really having a difficult time seeing how to actually make this happen.
Really? You think he doesn't understand why traffic cameras are put in place?
It actually pains me to say this in this case but, let's take arguments on their own merits. (Though I think it does not hurt to be aware of that stuff he wrote.)
As someone who only knows English, and is learning Mandarin / Traditional Chinese. I agree that Zhuyin is easier than Pinyin.
>The key problem with your assertion is that at the time insurance is purchased, nobody knows who will be the victim or whether there will be a victim. Purchasers of insurance would rather spend a little bit of money just in case a bad outcome occurs, so they don't bear the full brunt of that bad outcome. Those who don't end up with a bad outcome don't get their money back, which is why the system works.

You say that my comment was profoundly misguided, but your comment right here is just a rephrasing of mine Someone with risk spends a little bit of money to help absolve themselves of that risk. If a bad outcome occurs and they fall victim to that risk, they don't bear the full brunt of that bad outcome because money is shifted from people who didn't fall victim to that risk.

Regarding you point about probability based pricing of insurance, we have collectively decided that we don't want health insurance to function that way. If it did, it would lead to the preexisting condition problem in which a person cannot afford insurance because they have a condition that requires expensive care. We instead subsidize their policy with a price increase on everyone else's policy.
Check out Gilbert Strang's Linear Algebra course[0]. Material is of superior quality.

[0] https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-06sc-linear-algeb...
I'm probably biased, but Solaris' role-based access control system has been very successful among its particular customer base:

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/821-1456/rbac-1.ht...

It wasn't necessary to throw away POSIX history or concerns either.
You should be thinking more about the freedom of consumers to buy goods in a robust and competitive marketplace than you should about the freedom of tycoons to vertically integrate in said marketplace.
10 years is "that long", now?
You're comparing fighting a traffic ticket to the rights of same-sex marriages?

If an author has a stance on removing the rights of someone just because of their sexual preferences - you're right, I'm calling them out on it. I am in no way blocking their right to their own opinion, but adding my own.

For this author, the two subjects are very much entwined and related.
The general term for integrating these mitigating factors into roadway design is "traffic calming".
> am I rite

Not really.
After reading the article, it seems like cities could make the problem go away if they changed it from a hybrid criminal-civil matter to a purely civil case. Make it an infraction more like a parking ticket and I think it would be constitutional, wouldn't it?
And they could cut on distribution costs (less power lines)
it's just the /apply url that does the windows check. the rest of the site can be viewed from any os.
This is very exciting. But somehow sad to me at the same time. I don't wanna explain my feeling.
When a 0day hits, you first assess the impact, define your solution and start to work.

FTA

"Fixed packages have been prepared and shipped for RHEL as well as Fedora and Centos."

So updates were made, tested and made available. Our customers typically implement these security related updates very fast.

with that out of the way, the article explains how SELinux can mitigate this and similar issues.

And I am 100% sure that we coordinated the update and changes with Docker because that's how Open Source works.
Is it time to upend the idea that land is private property?
I don't care if Jesus, the director of security in heaven said that.

I'm going to take a look at both arguments and decide for myself. No need to name drop.
> How much does maintenance cost (replacing drives etc.)?

The maintenance on enterprise storage is generally a percentage of purchase price. So it's actually cheaper.

>How much do you pay to keep those HDDs powered per TB per year?

4.5 watts idle/8 watts max for a spinning drive vs. 4.5 watts idle/11 watts max for a large capacity SSD (15TB Samsung). The power consumption thing was a much better story comparing 3.5" 15k RPM drives. 7200 RPM drives it's basically a wash unless you're talking about relatively small capacity SSDs.

>How does the low IOPS of those drives affect your workload?

That's really the crux of the issue. SPINNING drives are not dead. FAST spinning drives are dead. 10k/15k drives are going to see the end of their useful life in the modern datacenter far faster than anyone predicted 2 years ago. Outside of legacy systems I would expect sales of 10k RPM drives to fall off a cliff if not completely disappear before the end of 2020.
I meant my opinion wasn't humble, not yours.
I didn't say that the Constitution was unambiguous, but that it is unambiguously the final law.
That's a bit harder to type.
Help a confused european: do you guys not have a car registration system, wherein when you sell a car the buyer has to go and register himself as the new owner before he gets registration plates and can drive the car?

How could the city not know who the owner of the car is?

Over here photo tickets follow a simple rule: if it's your car, it's your responsibility to know who's driving it. When you get a ticket, you either name the driver, or you pay it yourself. But I haven't heard of anyone getting a ticket for someone else's car.
CURATION JOBS Not LIKELY TO BE COMPUTERIZED
I haven't any numbers and I wasn't asserting anything about the quantity that exists.
Mammon_'s Tales to his Grandson: Linux on the Half-ELF
With LeBron 14 Release, Nike Is Bypassing the Shoe Store
Cool. If anyone else has ideas here, get in touch.
This is at the TCP/http layer not app logic. Your machine and the servers you're connected to don't have the right settings for dialup.

Turn up retries on TCP. Increase timeouts on the servers. Etc...
Same place you got your free iOS device.
What is so hard about getting this, I really don't understand??

Wife takes car in the evening to do some shopping. She comes back, daughter takes the car to see some friends. They both drove on the same road.
Month later, you get a letter saying that your car has been photographed doing 5mph over the limit on that day. The photo has a time stamp, but there's really no way to tell who was driving at that time, it could have been either your daughter or your wife.

What do you do?
Do you pay the fine, knowing fully well that it wasn't you driving? Or do you tell your wife or daughter to take the points? At the same time, you are aware that naming the wrong person is actually a criminal offence, and since you are not 100% certain who was driving, how can you name anyone??

Why shouldn't you demand more evidence from the police? Why shouldn't you tell the police that you simply don't know and have no way of knowing who was using the car at the time? How can the police ticket anybody in this case, since they don't know who was driving?

I really, really fail to see why is it so hard to understand this. Actually, I bet this happens all the time, but people prefer to just pay the fine and be done with it, instead of fighting for their rights.
I don't see it. What part of Windows makes it hard to learn the languages you offer? MySQL, JS, PHP
In California at least - the speed limit cannot be different (more than some statistical measure) of the real world speed people actually drive on the road. Theres a process for requesting a survey of actual vehicle speed for a street. If the measures speeds differ in a statistically significant way from the posted speed limit, the posted speed limit has to be changed.
How to explain HTML/CSS/SVG to your friends?
I suppose I'm not arguing from the perspective of fairness, but moreso about incentives + experience. If we applied the author's argument against other fields and languages, e.g. machine learning and python, then the cpython maintainers would be right in including TensorFlow in the python stdlib (or whichever competitor dethrones in and sticks around for long enough).

That doesn't sit well with me, at least. I'd want the top ML developers looking at TensorFlow, and the best language implementers doing the same for cpython, not the latter trying desperately to improve code they have no expertise in. From that perspective, what matters is community: is there a knowledgable community supporting codebase 'x', where x could be the stdlib or some third party library. Some other commenters in this thread proposed better library curation/discovery tools in place of a formal commitment of long term support by the core team, which seems ideal! Using such an approach, you rely on the language for the core-language bits, and on third parties for the third-party bits, which seems on the surface to be healthier than arbitrarily choosing the only constant group (core language devs) as your supporters of everything.
That would have been pretty useful during my college years. Most of the classes were on a IBM 370. I still have my assembly book and the assembly banana book. XEDIT was an interesting editor.

It was an interesting era since pretty much everyone trudged over to the computer lab to use the terminals to do their assignments. It does generate a bit of community in groups of people going through their degree at the same time.

It would have been interesting if IBM had got Motorola to second source the chip and used it instead of the 8088. Would have been a very different PC era.
There are tons of studies on this. Here's a good starting point, if you're interested. http://inequality.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/PathwaysW...
Chance the Rapper's Grammy Worth Marketing Plan
Possible I'm missing it, put seems like if you are going to build a phone the first step would be to state what governements and networks would support it.

For example, appears that in the US that even if the phone would have worked with AT&T in the past, that as the end of 2016, that is no longer the case:

https://www.att.com/esupport/article.html#!/wireless/KM10848...
Seems somewhat naive in that you can only pardon those who have been convicted. More of a statement of how the common US American public understands how the US government works.
they think people browse to their /apply page from a webserver?
A lot of this seems driven by IT departments cut to the bone or outsourced for minimum bid offshore.

In either case, enterprise IT doesn't have the benefit of spending time fiddling that used to exist.
Why not simply state that when posting? Bad style IMHO.
Metrowerks/Code Warrior had an x86 compiler in the late 90s. CodeWarrior was the BeOS PPC compiler and it was also used for the x86 R3 release (1998). For R4, they switched to GCC 2.9 (and from PE to ELF) because it generated better code (perhaps there were financial and other considerations as well).

Be paid Cygnus for the gcc port, shortly before red hat bought up Cygnus.
Tutorial about SQLInjection
Here’s the available specs on the Nintendo Switch hardware
http://i1.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/062/735/b6e...
I think I understand your confusion. I also spent time as an ex-pat in China. This is a bad sentence from the article:

"Before Pinyin was developed, 85% of Chinese people could not read, now almost all can."

In reads like the development of Pinyin is what led to this big change in the % of Chinese people who can now read. That is not correct and very misleading.

Pinyin was not the catalyst nor the major reason for changes in literacy levels. Rather it was new education policy and development of the new Simplified Chinese Characters (Newer Chinese characters with fewer line strokes in them - makes reading and writing much much more simple - it is still used today and is the official character language in China).

Pinyin was and is a huge deal. For foreigners learning Chinese and more importantly later on when it was chosen to be utilized as the input method when technology developed that required putting the Chinese language into computers and mobile phones.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Chinese_characters
Can you please take some time here to explain why their post was incorrect, with a brief technical explanation of why SELinux enforcement failed to stop the attack that exploits the particular vulnerability?

I realize you're busy, but it would be much more helpful than a curt statement that simply claims they are wrong.
Dude. Just. Go. Try. It.
> For example, if you get hurt by a red light runner, you should get paid by all the accident free red light tickets.

This is referenced in the article, but if there is an accident-free red light running incident, then there are no plaintiffs with standing to claim injury ergo there are no tickets issued (as there would be no one to issue them) ergo there would be no revenues.

The idea that you can make a facial wrong into something just by putting the ill-gotten gains to better use than they currently are is undoubtedly somewhat more noble an act than what is currently done, but still ignoble as it is predicated on ignobility.

Past that, your idea has pragmatic challenges. If the funds are placed into a trust or insurance policy, then they are not being used to fund the police and court systems that generate those funds, so the system cannot perpetuate itself without significantly raising the cost of the tickets to cover both the insurance policy funds and the regular maintenance fees, which makes a ticket expensive enough to be worth hiring an attorney to fight, meaning fewer fees collected, meaning fees would need be raised again to cover the cost of avoidance.
"specialist pain management clinics" isn't a treatment.
I guess more than just saying "this is bunkum" - I'm talking about examining the evidence and analytical techniques on both sides and engaging in debate rather than shutting the other side down, etc. Just citing stuff is a superficial level of debate, but for non-experts like us maybe that's all we can muster. In that case, we have to acknowledge that.
I def. take a critical eye to authors that have themselves taken a racist and/or homophobic stance (to name just two issues), and will defend that without question or apology. Make up your own opinions, but first get an idea on who you're trying to defend. This person's writing doesn't exist in a vacuum, and it's no a secret what his agenda is. I agree he has the right to express it, and I have the right to counter his writing, by showing what else they're writing about.
Absolutely - multiple halfassed re-implementations of the same thing found in most languages std lib is a huge reason why the language is bad (remember the left pad fiasco ?), but the semantics of the language make it fundamentally flawed without breaking backcompat. JS ecosystem is actually quite bad when it comes to functionality - but they do have 10 versions of same thing for stuff they do have and each of those works only in specific scenario it was written in but nobody bothers to extend it and writes their own instead when they need to solve something similar because reading other's people JS is a nightmare.

If anything the kind of breadth JS ecosystem has shows just how hard to maintain other people code is.
Prior article:
"Can a biologist fix a radio?"

http://www.cell.com/cancer-cell/abstract/S1535-6108(02)00133...

TL;DR: electronics are designed modularly, for easy analysis by end-users (mainly for repair). Biology is ... not designed so much as evolved, and evolves in a way that is not easily comprehended by human brains.
well I'm on a Mac. I have no idea how to get past weird window specific errors. And our code when it runs in production will run in linux. so... if all serious developers in the industry use Mac/linux, why even mess with windows? I don't see the + I only see -
Then what I suggested bears no resemblance to a literacy test. You wouldn't need to "pass" the test, just simply take it in order to encourage you to consider the issues and how the candidates align with your views.

But I agree with the other commenter, selecting the questions in a fair way would be challenging.
That's... such a good idea.
For other Californians selling or donating cars, a crucial step is to complete a "Notice of Transfer and Release of Liability" form. details at:

https://www.dmv.ca.gov/portal/dmv/detail/vr/vr_info#BM2520

but the key language is:

> Protect Your Liability. Complete a Notice of Transfer and Release of Liability. The seller is responsible for reporting the change of ownership to DMV within 5 days from the date of sale. After DMV updates the information from the Notice of Transfer and Release of Liability, you will be cleared from future liability on the vehicle. The purchaser is responsible for reporting the change of ownership to DMV within 10 days from the date of purchase.

Being liable for a traffic ticket is one thing, but imagine being thought liable for a hit and run collision.
One of the reasons I like OpenBSD. Linux has a habit of taking well established things and replacing them with incompatible things (firewalld, systemd for example).

I have enough to do, I don't need to throw away years of acquired experience every few releases. It's one thing if the replacements are clearly better, but for me they just seem to be new, different ways to do the same things.
The purpose of a bootcamp is to take an inexperienced or new developer and get them job ready. This is possible with web dev, as theres a large market for it and its sufficiently "shallow" enough to be usefully productive in a few months.

The subjects you mentioned have much smaller, specialized job markets and take longer to learn.
Key rotation, user experience, and crypto reporting
huh? we think people goto our /apply page all the time from browsers. those browsers send a field called user-agent that contains information about what operating system that browser is running on.
My bad, pushed a fix to use \x01.
Opera Neon – a concept browser
RFC 7159 is sort of sloppy, saying "JSON texts that are encoded in UTF-8 are interoperable in the sense that they will be read successfully by the maximum number of implementations" while allowing UTF-16 and UTF-32 and not actually requiring UTF-8 be supported. ECMA 404 doesn't address the issue.
Bullseye landing of Stage 1! This is always so inspiring to watch live
Not remotely true. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/20...
Our project was mainly an operational effort rather than a technological one. We weren't to build any of the "core vr" technology, but to build an app upon the existing.

Taking a VR tour of a place is relatively easy. Taking a VR tour of every place is absolutely hard.
Heh, I signed on just in time to see the landing. Smoothly done once again!
No, there were not, and it was disclosed to related vendors some weeks earlier. Some people seem to thing "0 day" is a l33t term for "vulnerability" it seems.
Thanks for the support, it's strange that more people don't openly acknowledge that the medical system isn't a free market.
It might well be true, but the details of the VICE story (one email from Snowden asking a question about whether a training programme was correct in asserting that executive orders were equivalent to acts of congress, and a belatedly acknowledged meeting with a compliance trainer which the compliance trainer says consisted of Snowden complaining about "trick questions" ) don't really back up the clickbaity headline...

(my clickbaity headline would be "NSA appears to lack competence at searching its own email")
‘I knew that a battlefield of suffering was in my eyes': Frida Kahlo
> put safety related ticket revenue 100 percent into an insurance policy

That's a great idea. But that means taking that revenue from fines out of the government's general fund. Or it means engaging in a shadow-booking shell game where the fine revenue goes both to (a) showing the government's general fund books are balanced and (b) is somehow earmarked for making restitution to victims.

Your suggestion requires long-term honest bookkeeping from a government. I believe that makes it infeasible, sorry to say.
NB: Title edited for space.
thanks. Did you watch it?
My point about "inside the community" was solely to say that it's not as bad as he makes it out to be. You usually get recommendations and help picking one within minutes of posting on a Rust forum. (Or by googling it). Survivorship bias is irrelevant here.

This is not an ideal situation to be in, but it is better than he makes it out to be. And of course, we're already working on fixing it.
"learning to code"

I didn't know specific OSes were required to learn to code.

"am I rite?"

No. Clearly you need a source and I have a feeling you're not going to find one.

Your childish tone may prove to gain you favor with other myopic people, but you sound like the people I wouldn't want as a teammate, don't worry, you'll get some interested people, but they'll be just like you, but maybe you won't notice.
We live in exciting times!
Technically "p" in English does not default to the aspirated (pot) or unaspirated variety (hop). English speakers don't distinguish different word meanings when just those sounds by themselves are different, so they're considered homophones. Perhaps you knew that already and I just misread your comment, but thought it may be helpful info if not.
To understand the impact of Pinyin, all you have to do is take a look at the alternative input sources for Chinese on your computer or phone.

On my Mac it's under Settings -> Keyboard -> Input Sources. Add a new input source for Select Chinese (Simplified) and take a look at the alternatives:

- Stroke, which uses only symbol characters and numbers to "write" words. Good luck with that!

- Trackpad handwriting. You "write" the characters on your trackpad and it recognizes them. Works pretty well if you already know how to write the characters. But it's much, much slower in my opinion. Plus, you need to memorize how to write thousands of characters and how the characters connect to how the words sound, which there is no systematic mapping for.

- Wubi Xing, which I'm unfamiliar with but seems radical based. Just look at the keyboard - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wubi_method

- Pinyin, which uses your regular English keyboard. With a little training, you can sound out Chinese words and immediately type them with autocorrect-like functionality that works amazingly well. I can type Chinese almost as fast as English this way.

In short, Pinyin has made it possible for Chinese people to operate efficiently in the modern world we live in.