skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They would only need to show that the software they are asking you to unlock does not have the behaviour you describe; which will be easy in the common case of you using default software. If you are using plausibly deniable software, then they could still compel your peers to surrender their passwords unless everyone involved was using plausibly deniable software.

This would put us back to the pre-dark world where the government had access to all digital records that were not maintained by people with super-human op-sec practices.

Further, even if you do have amazing op-sec, they could still attempt to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the data is an encrypted message through non technical means. For example, if they can show that you accessed the alleged data the week before.

Even if there are some cases where, through technical means, one prevents the government access to the data, the number of such cases is still smaller than the number of cases that would be prevented by default encryption.
Learn the practice of stoicism and remember the point of being angry is to convey displeasure, but if it will not create an action or change then there is no point.

Additionally, the more often you are angry, over time, the less people will pay attention to it, so it basically becomes ineffective - save it for when you need it.
The majority, yes. However some were "interesting".
I think we're in complete agreement here.
Your forum, your rules, but setting it up as principled seems a bit much. A slur requires a specific target, where I made an oblique statement about culture being a cause of less success.

Punk is a culture that glorifies failure, more than one religion exalts poverty, and some value quality of life over material success, still others reject social acceptance by criteria set by their perceived former oppressors, and even others rejected basic education and english literacy in America because it was perceived as destructive to their family hierarchy and cultural identity.

Just because this line of reasoning does not explicitly exclude some bugbears on your team, does not mean that it is advocating a minority interest on mine.

HN keeps within the boundaries of certain values because it is used as the source of record by political players who really, really want our money and political control of the technologies we create. Quite reasonably, HN's owners don't want to provide them ammunition. Imagining YC principals called in front of congress and being asked to defend the most extreme statements published on HN or submit to regulation sounds almost plausible.

However, by tolerating heterodox views, does this forum perpetuate them? Or, does suppressing heterodox views reduce their spread? In both cases, probably not. In fact, I would argue that a decade of suppressing them resulted in the extreme over correction that was your election result.

I would take sound reasoning over cherry picked data any day of the week. You are welcome to call me a racist, apostate, a whateverphobe, or out of bounds of the overton window, as that is the convention these days, but given the quality of these epithets, I am not convinced anyone at HN is qualified to make determinations of my civility.
Awesome project. While going over it to figure out how it worked, I looked up the 'cl' package and noticed that it has been deprecated in favor of cl-lib. [1] Also, what license (if any) does this fall under?

[1] https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/CommonLispForEmacs
Remo Recover 4.0 Keygen Crack and Serial Key Full Download
That is certainly reassuring in this case. But this is a reminder that either our voting system is secure from tampering or we are pretending that our elections are honest and that the people in office are who we voted for.

I think most people here would have a difficult time saying our voting system is secure from tampering.
Well we know there are different kinds in the animal kingdom.

The octopus brain developed completely independently from our brain for instance. The octopus does not learn socially, is able to function independently from birth, and learns everything it does in a few years, as its lifespan is short.

So there must be some major differences due to very different origin and learning styles.
Right, the idea is you build and distribute a system, such as Signal, built around this concept.

You haven't addressed the civil liberties angle though: should the government be able to make this software illegal? If not, crypto people can design such a system.

Existing warrant processes already get you to the system that you describe, so I don't know why the House would talk about it as some future innovation and change needed, if their goal wasn't to make the system I describe less permitted.
Is the amount of energy per burst based on the assumption that it's radiating in a sphere versus being directional?
I have the 3 and I love it. I can't compare it to a real flagship (like Galaxy or Pixel) but for $300 I got a really great phone that people always comment on.
> Always the headline is Watson and Crick. Not Franklin with some minor assistance from ...

Oddly, Wilkins is always left out too. That trio won the Nobel.

Maybe Watson and Crick were just better at selling themselves.
Are you saying Russia didn't have a measurable impact on the election and Trump becoming president?
This might just be a neutron star as said in the last line. But the moment we realise that we are not special, we start to believe the possibility of another life form elsewhere.
Has it ever crossed your mind that given the global nature of certain things such as climate change, rational actors in the sovereign nation states would then conclude it is indeed in their best interests to cooperate internationally on such issues while still maintaining their sovereignty?

I see this trite argument brought up far too often, that national borders are so medieval... and don't make sense anymore.

I'm having a hard time resisting the urge to curse here, and I say that because I want to convey how strongly I feel this line of thinking is foolish, naive, and a complete misunderstanding of the history of governmental structures throughout the modern history of the world and their impact on the progression of human rights and other advances.

The American Revolution was and is a unique revolution throughout the ages, one which established a unique government based on natural rights. I in no way agree that such a structure, with rule of law based on those principles, is in any way, shape, or form, "short-sighted" or "nonsensical". As a matter of fact, if you were an American politician, the statement you have just made would qualify you for removal from office and imprisonment and/or a fine, under 5 U.S. Code § 7311.

I see though, you may be from Spain. I really do get tired of being lectured on the dangers of nationalism by members of "constitutional" monarchies... really an anecdotal point but I find it's true often enough to make a point of it. Such governments have classically been opposed to nationalism for completely different reasons, ones I find more truthful even today than the proclaimed "we need to solve global issues" cliches. Such reasons usually being that if they allowed sovereignty of nation-states it undermines their global power positions!

"The world needs more corporation"

What an appropos freudian slip, for if we were to remove the nation-state from the world stage, more (mega-supranational-)corporation is exactly what we would get.

Now, one point of agreement. Yes, I am not disputing that the world needs more cooperation on international issues, but to then turn around and use those issues to advocate overthrowing the idea of sovereignty is a logically fallacious reasoning, is callous and naive, and I can only imagine such touting comes from the ivory tower of intellectuals, academics and other insulated peoples who haven't experienced the stark reality of this world when the sovereignty of nation states is violated.

In short, those who call for an end of nationalism fail to understand the proper and right role of sovereignty in the apllication of the rule of law, and in the ability for the people to affect their government.

So tell me, what would you propose to replace the nation-state with once you toppled it down?
CALL GIRL ESCORT ATHENS KIRA – escorts| athens escorts |call girls
> If you're a salaried employee, the company will almost always demand more time than you want to provide.... Don't expect them to value your time in any meaningful sense. Protect it for yourself in the most graceful and diplomatic way possible.

This is so extremely important, right from the get go. If, in your first months of employment you work 60 hour weeks, you have set the expectation that will continue.

If, on the other hand, you push back to what is reasonable, that's the expectation that has been set, and will continue into the future.
And it actually comes from perl, which used to announce their next big release on christmas. but it never came, and they claimed they never said which christmas, just one eventually.
This is how the language works. Go doesn't have any sort of deep copying mechanism for channels to use, so if you want to send a buffer on the channel, it's on you to not reuse its slice.
Of course the majority were mundane. The majority of Chapo Guzman's private communications would be mundane too. The contents of the DNC emails suggest nothing about the contents of the RNC emails, though I have no doubt that republicans are equally crooked.
His? Could be hers..
Clinton did win the popular vote by a large margin, although that's not really germane to the grandparent comment. I think the point he was trying to make is that Assange/wikileaks lost a lot of credibility during the recent U.S. election cycle by being blatantly partisan. They dressed up their DNC email leaks in bombshell controversy, but ultimately there was no great revelation - nobody was arrested, no investigations were began, etc. Of course, the damage was done by the timing and the subsequent response of the conservative media machine.

I think for a lot of moderates like myself, wikileaks has clearly hooked its wagon to the anti-NATO, anti-EU, pro-Russia, nationalist movement that elected Donald Trump. How can I trust anything they leak when they have an agenda that involves vilifying democrats and electing pro-Russia republicans?
Who even mentioned Clinton?

It's weird how a lot of conversations about the strong evidence that Russia influenced the US election are refuted with "yeah, but Clinton" as if that even starts to justify the situation.

The last year has very clearly done away with the idea that Wikileaks is a non-partisan body that only pursues truth. Maybe Assange has finally gone stir-crazy in that embassy, but he's actively ruining the good name he created.
There seems to be some dispute regarding the truthfulness of such reports.

https://www.reddit.com/r/WhereIsAssange/comments/5k2zkc/juli...
"he would stand in front of management and say "no, fuck that, that's useless". He was quite successful and could "get away" with this behaviour, though I suspect it was this very behaviour which had something to do with his success."

Your manager gets what Merlin Mann could not, the most important tasks are the ones you need to do ^right now^, to completion.

It's interesting that Bethlehem Steel is mentioned. Charles R. Schwab, the Bethlehem Steel boss, someone who Thomas Edison described as a ^hustler^, engaged Ivy Ledbetter Lee to improve productivity at Bethlehem for managers. [1] What is not mentioned is the fact Lee was a business owner of an early PR company and approached Bethlehem for business. His hack to Bethlehem management, set aside 15 minutes at the end of a day and specify six tasks you need done tomorrow;

* Prioritise them, one to six;

* Do each task, in order, till finished;

* Work your arse off;

* Left-over tasks are added to tomorrows list;

* Repeat;

I coin this, JIT task task management [3] and that simple behaviour your manager shows reflects this simple idea. I Merlin Mann totally misses this fact. [4] I was so impressed with Lees idea I wrote an article and some software to explore this idea.

References

[1] James Clear, "The Ivy Lee Method" ~ http://jamesclear.com/ivy-lee

[2] "Zero Tasks: Maximum Six. Add new tasks to leftovers. Prioritise. Kill one task at a time. Repeat.", http://seldomlogical.com/2016/NOV/19/zero-tasks/

[3] A month ago: "
To-Do Lists Are Not the Answer to Getting Things Done" ~ https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12999565#13002833

[4] Merlin Mann, "Inbox Zero" (July 23, 2007) ~ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9UjeTMb3Yk
Yes you're right that (( )) isn't POSIX but $(( )) is -- I was lazy and borrowed it from the example. The one change I made was to change brace expansion {1..100} to $(seq 100) because the former isn't in POSIX, but yeah the whole thing wasn't POSIX anyway.

But it doesn't really detract from the point -- if shell has arithmetic and bitwise operators built in, it's not a stretch for it to have set operations built in.
The possibility of another life form does not make us any less special. Each of us exists as a single individual; the same goes for each of them. I welcome and cherish any life forms that may yet exist.
It's kind of weird how this comes from a "scientist" instead of a philosopher. I read the article and it's basically saying this scientist guy came up with the definitive "definition" of the mind so other scientists can have a common ground to build upon.

While I understand where this is coming from, I still don't understand why a "scientist" is advertising this concept as something novel. Also I can't believe a scientist--who should know better--is trying to define this.

This debate has existed throughout human history and you could even arguably say the entire history of philosophy is to figure out the answer to this problem.

I also visited the author's book page on Amazon https://www.amazon.com/Mind-Journey-Heart-Being-Human/dp/039... (of which this article is an advertorial), and just look at that cover art. This is not a "scientist" material. Really reminds me of some Eckhart Tolle stuff.
That's how we have it :-) Albeit with a call to action in the footer of the message to sign up. If you, don't though it will continue to work
hey folks, if this is not ok i'll remove my reply. I just want to post this article I wrote on the subject a few months ago:

https://medium.com/for-for-thought-for-rainy-days/life-cause...

If anyone finds the time and mood to go over it I'd appreciate a discussion :)
I'm assuming you are asking what license cl-lib falls under.

From the top of cl-lib.el in Emacs 25.1:

;;; cl-lib.el --- Common Lisp extensions for Emacs -*- lexical-binding: t -*-

;; Copyright (C) 1993, 2001-2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

;; Author: Dave Gillespie <daveg@synaptics.com>
;; Version: 1.0
;; Keywords: extensions

;; This file is part of GNU Emacs.

;; GNU Emacs is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
;; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
;; the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
;; (at your option) any later version.

;; GNU Emacs is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
;; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
;; GNU General Public License for more details.

;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
;; along with GNU Emacs. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
True.. språk is how I meant it, but I couldn't register as that on HN. å evolved from aa..
No apps for android or iOS. For right now it's just a browser extension
> revealing a password that you know isn't exactly forced confession

Revealing a password reveals that you knew the password. It's admitting to having access to the device.

There is also the obvious problem when you don't know the password. It's manifestly unreasonable to punish someone for not doing something they can't actually do.

But if not knowing is unconditionally a valid excuse then this is all a just hair splitting exercise to determine how defendants will phrase the refusal. And if it's only conditionally a valid excuse then you're back to forcing someone to testify as to why they don't know the password (e.g. admitting "that's not my phone").
This itself presupposes that life is special, instead of just one possibility among a myriad. English is unique to earth, not because English is special, but because it's not special.
At the very least (npm, conda) multiple independent environments, allowing conflicting versions of a library to exist simultaneously in different environments.

One should never, ever bypass the operating system's software management subsystem, because then, one needs a hack like Docker, since the OS will have no notion of the software installed, and a system specifically invented and designed for managing said software won't be able to manage it. I could author a book on just how bad of an idea using a packaging system proprietary to some language or application is. By utilizing a packaging system outside of the operating system's packaging, anyone doing so undermines operational repeatability (see capability maturity model level 2 and higher).

allowing conflicting versions of a library to exist simultaneously in different environments.

That's another very bad thing: it's a workaround for lack of thinking about backwards compatibility, and designing a single library with multiple versions of the API, and, and, and... I happen to work on an application which utilizes 300 such environments, and it's a nightmare.

Finally, by using a packaging system proprietary to a language, anyone doing so is now forcing everyone else who wants to use said software to wrestle with multiple packaging systems; and if every developer thought that way, the end consumer would have to wrestle with all of them. I don't think I need to point out just how irresponsible, not to mention inconsiderate that is towards users. Users of the application, not developers should come first, and only then everything else. In this day and age of automated builds, it is trivial to set up automatic generation of operating system packages for various systems. Trivial, and developers must take responsibility for that, instead of putting the onus on the consumer of the software.
I agree. The fact that high school students are struggling with epsilon-delta notation of limits is not because they lack historical context. It is just far beyond what most people can grasp.

Most of my school mates had zero understanding of the mathematics we learned. They memorised how to compute the distance between a point and a sphere, a line and a sphere, a plane and a sphere, and then they'd solve one of these problems for the exam, get a good grade, and forget everything immediately afterwards. At no point have they understood what a scalar product is and why they are using it.

If you'd really want to improve mathematics education, you should focus a lot more on the basics, and teach advanced subjects only to the handful of students that are interested in them.
To be honest, we'd just rather have more bugs knocked out before we share. We take pride in our code just like most people
Because I read the docs but I didn't understand it so I wasn't sure, but had confidence that I was right based on the other points.
I've had great success with the Pomodoro technique. It really increased my focus and decreased stress. I plan my day out in time blocks, then I focus one item at a time.

The timer isn't a deadline. It just notifies you of when the 20 minutes is up. I don't even look at the timer when I'm working.
Now That’s What I Call Script-Assisted-Classified Pattern Recognized Music
7124 Tuxedo Street in Detroit, Saving father's house brings new hope
How to hack your book list and your startup
Open Access Rewards Passionate Curiosity: 2016 in Review
This is really really spot on. I am definitely a maker, and as my company grows, I really believe we need to stock up on the mender-types. So critical to have those skills and those personalities as part of an org.
MacBook Battery Time Remaining
Technically I also used my real name as my account name... just the md5 of my name :)
You're describing one of the four classic Bartle Types: https://repignite.com/2014/07/richard-bartle-player-types/
Oh no, I meant raytracer.el. Would it fall under the GPL by default? (Does running raytracer.el within GNU Emacs count as extending it?)
No great revelation? The expectation of political favors in exchange for money is pretty huge. Selling Russia Uranium while accusing them of working for the other side. Citibank supplying Obamas entire cabinet.

I don't know what you think is a non issue if those are partisan to you.

Furthermore, why would you not trust a truthful source because of political motivation? That reeks of cognitive dissonance.
Possibly the worst article I've read about mind-body dilemma.
Windows for Submarines (2008)
>for (int i =0;i<len;i++){ if(lines[i] == "a"){ i+=2; } }

This algorithm can, without modification, be done in a functional language. For example, consider the following Haskell:

import Control.Monad.Loops
import Control.Monad

for_ :: (Monad m) => m () -> m Bool -> m () -> m ()
for_ init guard step body =
init >>
whileM_ guard (body >> step)

loop :: [string] -> State Int ()
loop lines = for_ (put 0) (get (<(length lines))) (modify (+1)) (when (get >>= \i -> (lines!!i == "a")) (modify (+2)))

I did not use do notation to avoid accusations of cheating; and am defining for_ here because Haskell's standard library for loop only iterates through data-structures (like the for loop of many imperative languages). I will also admit that the Haskell version is ugly due to its verbosity (because, even though it is possible, it is not how you are supposed to do things in Haskell).

EDIT: Made for_ generic and added type signature for loop.

If you want multiple "variables" in this approach, you can define a datatype to store them:

data S = S { i :: Int ... }

In this case, we can access i by replacing "get" with "gets i" in the above example ( "i" being an accessor function that Haskell automatically defines when we create a datatype with a field called "i"). You can imagine the generated value "i" being a more complicated datatype that can be both a getter and setter, in which case we can define "puts i" to be the analog of "gets i" and "put".

I think I have seen this approach done in Haskell but cannot remember what it is called.
Please elaborate with sources - those are big claims!
News article - http://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a19061/brit...
The interesting thing to me about the FP vs OO discussion that your link highlights very well is that one of the major benefits of FP languages is the expressive type systems that, at least the oo languages I've seen completely lack.

I'm not sure why no mainstream OO language addresses this.
He already did a lot of damage to his name when he screwed over his friends and supporters who put up his bail by fleeing to the Ecuadorian embassy.
I prefer it when people come to ask me in person. So much more efficient. A 5 minute conversation can sometimes replace days of back and forth emails.
If we're talking K2 I think it doesn't matter. Either power requirement outstrips anything otherwise naturally occurring.
If anyone has a clue why this was downvoted, please clue me in. It was on topic and indicating missing information.

Edit: I really don't care how much I get downvoted, I'm going to highlight its uselessness until someone cares to justify it.
CRAVE – Delicious homemade food at your doorstep
- Facebook account is like herpes, it stays with you for life.

- No, Facebook is worse.

- How?

- Herpes goes away when you die.
It's a parallel, not a comparison.
In respect of the greeks, this is one cheap souvenir that can actually provide timeless merriment. I have a few made of burnt clay that are souvenirs from decades ago and still there are new people who can delightfully be educated on the principles of these wonderfull devices.
Good. You're learning.