skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Wait, did you make a typo, and it was 30 seconds for the CPU run time, not 30 minutes? If so, then yes, that's more realistic.
As Sleep Improves, So Does an Injured Brain
> Foundation's link takes me to a page where I have a bunch of options, and a bit "build a custom generated version".

Their navigation is fuck all. Bootstraps is easy.

Bootstrap:

- Here's how you get started

- Here's the components and how to use them

- If you want a custom build, go here

Foundation:

- Getting started? "Sites Docs" which is in a menu under their "Docs"
menu

- Components? Included in the same menu under "Sites Docs" on the same page as getting started. The components are in the right hand menu.

- Custom build? Located in the "Resources" menu under "Develop"

Not at all intuitive. I still remember being frustrated at how I had to fumble around their site trying to find stuff.

> Bootstrap's takes me to a screen with 3 options, but also - and this is key - CDN links. Right there. I can paste a few lines in my HTML template and start working.

This has been available for Foundation for a few years already:

https://www.foundationcdn.com/

> I don't need to install node/npm/etc.

This is a biggie. I've been doing a lot more static site development and the JS frameworks now to create a decent website can been a huge PIA. There are a ton of them out there now - they're having the same issue JS frameworks are having, people are being fatigued by the amount of choices out there.

Compare that to MVC4 or 5 where I can get a Bootstrap template setup with views and controllers and create multiple templates in a matter of minutes, it's insane.
If you have a decision process of some kind you can get more value out of it if you can link it to a utility function in which the "tool" tries to maximize the value it creates.

It's tough enough to get value out of A.I. that this trick should not be left on the table. Thus Tool A.I.s need to be Agent A.I.s to maximize their potential.
Tracking HelloFresh's Growth
I force-enabled multi-process FF a while ago and haven't had any issues. In the 49.x series there were one or two tab crashes, but I can't think of any recently. All of my extensions have worked just fine too.
Does firefox run each tab in its own process yet? Or live inside a sandbox? I switched from firefox + noscript to chrome after accepting that firefox's security (even with noscript enabled) was just so far behind that of chrome.
That's our eventual plan! I haven't ordered one yet since all of them have reviews about cats being able to open them up plus I have to figure out how to transition to a dry food diet again. Mine will paw at the sealed container of bonito flakes we use as treats... I'm 110% counting on needing to harden a feeder.
Finally! Every other major framework needs to jump on this bandwagon and stop supporting IE9 and then the users will realize they are outdated...at least I would hope so. Every aspect of Frontend development adds a ton of extra hours when building around IE9's quirks. I had the same idea as Bootstrap building my own Flexbox based CSS framework Useful.ly
relevant here: http://www.pnas.org/content/111/20/7168.full
This is roughly what 'scheduler activations' and 'kernel scheduled entities' did. Except rather than just being in response to page faults, it was any interaction with the kernel that would block.
Riot is a good alternative to IRC, Slack and other team/community chat systems.

It's not an option for the international 1 on 1 most Skype users are used to. The closest option seems to be Wire, but I've yet to try it.
Typical consumer VR hardware isn't close to accurate enough for this. These sort of systems have been done though, as have 3D ultrasound via sweeping. Works quite well for some applications (e.g. Trans-esophageal)
It would be great to see a sample project implementing the architecture described here. I agree with the criticisms of MVC and how it scales. I believe you can make the same critiques of MVP. Speaking as an android developer, it would be great to have some simpler (minimum lifecycle hooks), more flexible (shared element transitions), and bug-free (avoid unexpected asynchronous calls) navigation components. Fragments and Activity offer neither of these.

Where I am lost is how Uber makes the jump from MVP to Router, View Controller, Presenter, Builder, Component, Interactor. An example use case with code would be interesting to look at.
'Google moving away from Java in favor of Dart and Go because they couldn't get legal control of the Java language.' I have no solid evidence but from legal battles with Oracle and Google's focus on wanting to control their entire stack it might have some merit.
"by far the worst line of reasoning I've ever encountered" is a tad rude. If you disagree with something feel free to explain why (which you did), but saying it's by far the worst reasoning ever on HN isn't really constructive.

All they're saying is that in terms of popularity, having lower barriers to entry helps.
This, more than any advocacy from CLers, has shown me why I might prefer CL over Scheme.
You could enable it for quite a while already, but currently the content processes are still using a process pool of 1.
How is the hardware deliberately crippled, though? You keep saying things like that as if they're objective facts. The new Macbooks can run exactly the same software and hardware as the old ones. The only difference is that you may need an adapter unless you have newer devices that can use USB-C. There's no way you could say that any of these are a downgrade from their predecessors when they have faster processors, more storage space, and better displays than any of the old machines. Again, you're bemoaning something that is entirely your decision. You expect the one of the biggest computer manufacturers in the world to cater to your specific workflow rather than verifying that your workflow is adaptable and extensible. That seems backwards to me and your lament seems completely misplaced.
There's a difference between speed and correctness. If you promise something in the spec (e.g. unreachable control flow not mattering), in practice, that promise should be upheld. If it's upheld with a 32x slowdown (e.g. warp divergence), then so be it, but the code should still run correctly according to the spec.
Thanks for sharing.

Sound like a total dick. Glad this wasn't a bar in Florida where you can conceal carry. Dude comes to some establishment and threatens employees and owner with criminal prosecution and filing criminal charges, then when they want to return the phone to the police, he would rather have it returned to them...

What a dick.
World cannot be inspected in any meaningful way in this paradigm so it is fully deterministic because the differences aren't important.

> So the (a, World) result isnt fully deterministic from World. Even if you make each IO operation atomic, a chain of IO is still impure because the final (a, World) result depends on mutations introduced during execution.

It is fully deterministic from World but you cannot possibly describe a World so you can't supply it nor replicate it.

> So Haskell is "pure" when it comes to IO, but not in the way anyone except overly pedantic people mean the term.

You can't create a World so it is pedantic in that fashion but you are able to think of the functions as pure otherwise making integration easier.

A simple example is that IO happens in the correct order in Haskell because of the evaluation order not due to some external construct ensuring that lazy doesn't bite you.
moral in the story is, go big and stay free (helps if you can hide behind mega corporation walls.)
> we lose the nuances that are communicated ... But think of all the kinds of discrimination

That reminds me communist utopia: lets make all people equal ... by making everyone poor.
So part of the idea isn't just putting in raw effort, it is about trying alternate methods and strategies. Figuring out why the goals weren't reached, and determining multiple different strategies for achieving those goals. If they just put more effort into the same failing strategy, it just doesn't work.

Do the same thing a different way, in essence.
Also relevant:

https://0xax.gitbooks.io/linux-insides/content/Cgroups/cgrou...
Flexbox excels for UI and CSS grid will work nice for layouts and some UI structure too. Together they are a powerhouse: this article explains it well https://rachelandrew.co.uk/archives/2016/03/30/should-i-use-...
Every professional is able to distinguish a Stradivarius from a modern instrument. Even a non-professional violinist could tell the difference between a Strad and a Strad copy. The best Strad copy [0] is a recently made violin in Canada for about $27k. That may sound expensive, but I personally know several people with instruments more expensive than that.

You may be referring to the question "which is the older instrument". (Which was asked in exactly one reputable study.) To which I say: why does it matter? Again, that's like asking "what is the older piece of art" when showing people the Mona Lisa. Is it interesting that, according to that one study, professional musicians are bad at guessing the age of their instruments? Kinda, I guess.

If you do want to trumpet that poll though, go ahead - be my guest. But you should know that a big reason why Strads are so valuable is (drum roll)... that they don't show their age.

[0] The instrument in question is a 1993 copy of the Booth Strad.
You must entertain your cat(s). I find it best to do so consciously for fear of what the cat will deem entertaining otherwise.
Some cats do much better when they have other animals or cat friends to socialize with. It depends on a number of factors, and much like human, not every cat is the same.

The amount of desired human attention sought from cats in our household has has decreased as the number of cats in the has increased. That's not to say they don't still want our attention, or that we don't give it to them. Having friends to keep busy seems to make the days go by easier.
I had a 3D ultrasound done at this place - http://www.firstviewultrasound.com - not long ago. I guess expensive means different things to different people, but I wound up with a CD full of a few dozen images and some movies for somewhere in the neighborhood of $100, which I thought it was a pretty good deal.
Yes, but with kids, you can at least have the hope that they'll eventually learn to know better. With cats... not so much.
I have a feeling open source projects flourish in spite of their distributed contributors.

Text chat is a poor replacement to in-person conversation as it is occasionally async and a lot of meaning is lost. Video conference is better, but is less spontaneous and makes it harder to pull someone else into the conversation. Above all, text and video eliminate serendipity - I won't overhear the the conversation my colleagues are having about a pain-point I solved 2 days ago. I don't think channels on slack can ever replace this for me - following a text discussion takes my full attention, unlike people talking within earshot.
That explains why my dog doesn't understand me when I tell her not to eat the furniture, or rocks. I should just tell her, "don't take in any more rocks!"
Lady Gaga – Million Reasons
MacOS Sierra 12.12.2 – OCR Text Removed with Preview and Scanned PDFs?
And if you want so, the about:config key to fiddle with is called "dom.ipc.processCount" and currently defaults to 1, with plans to raise this soon, as described by the article.

EDIT also, to come back to DanBlake's question about whether Firefox now "run[s] each tab in its own process yet": no it doesn't; the architecture that was chosen is a process pool, available to all tabs. I won't elaborate much as you can find blogposts where Mozilla engineers detail why this design; IIRC it boils down to: it fulfills the security/performance objectives, and avoids a bit of overhead caused by the one-process-per-tab approach.
No, your cellphone for example probably has open source code.

A common restriction is to release the source code when distributing the software. But, that's not really an issue with medical devices as there is a physical device not just software involved.
I don't know where you live, but the stress of commuting alone has led me to want to get out of the business. Companies have got to smarten up! There's no earthly reason why dedicated knowledge workers need to be on some cube farm or stupid newsroom office every day. It sucks.
The feeder only contains room for a day's worth of food, it doesn't have a "hopper" and isn't designed for unattended use. It's (unhacked) purpose is mostly for multiple pet households to prevent food theft or enforcing special diets.
Personally I think the most cringe worthy thing about optimizely is that they no longer have up front pricing.

With frameworks that go far beyond AB testing for most backends why would you lock into something like optimizely:

https://github.com/github/scientist
Move over Cas9, CRISPR-Cas3 might hold the key to solving the antibiotics crisis
Seems like Foundation is moving fast toward the future, maybe this will help your decision: http://zurb.com/article/1460/foundation-for-sites-6-3-a-litt...
As an Indian growing up in the 90's, I went thru' the perhaps unique situation during the growth of the Web, where hyperlinks were targeted for breadth but the existing connection speed enforced the decision on you whether you'd stay with the article (ie: depth) versus whether you'd explore (ie: breadth). Honestly, it was a pretty hard decision and while I think this is a good effort to question something fundamental to the Web and how we interact with it, I'm not sure this well intentioned proposal would really work in the absence of a physical limitation by bandwidth.
If you want to learn about linux container internals, I can recommend just trying to implement one yourself in some random language for fun. I wrote a basic runtime in python that can run docker images:

https://github.com/kragniz/omochabako

Quick demo: https://asciinema.org/a/77296?speed=2&autoplay=1
You're the only one. Commuting SUCKS!
I do not remember any office where I would be sweating. It's always cold in the office for me.
I've been using Rust to process fairly large amounts of streaming financial data. I am using Protocol Buffers (and evaluating Cap'n Proto) for network serialization and Kafka for buffering/queuing, and overall the library support is quite good.

Previously I was using JVM languages for this purpose, but grew weary of the resource footprint, and especially the unpredictable GC pauses. I am aware of the Azul JVM which removes GC pauses and of various Java techniques to avoid GC altogether, but switching to Rust provided a GC-less model from the ground-up, a powerful type system, and familiar functional programming facilities at no cost.
Oh wow. Now that's embarrassing. My bad for stirring things up with that
Both of those topics are discussed in the blog post, btw.
Ford Mustang GT 5.0 vs. Chevrolet Camaro SS – Acceleration and Exhaust Sound
New Whitehouse Report – Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and the Economy
>Voice + screen sharing is about as efficient as a face-to-face conversation.

Not even close. It's doable, but not as efficient.
False. The official wrappers support C++ from OpenCL 1.0 on. Maybe this isn't obvious because the C++ bindings were introduced later, but they're backwards compatible and you can set the target API level. (And of course you use 1.2 if you need to support lagging vendors such as NVIDIA)

I have no idea about the other languages but surely other bindings must exist?
Because the feeder holds a single meal and is designed for access control (multiple pets) and not really automatic/timed feeding. A feeder with a sort of food hopper isn't too useful to me since I alternate dry/wet food for breakfast/dinner. A lockout timer would be though!
Never read "smallcultfollowing" before.

The "implicitly copyable" problem is amusing. That was dealt with by Wirth in Modula 1 with the rule "if the programmer can't tell, it's up to the compiler". Thus, non-writable objects could be passed either by reference or by copy, depending on object size. This was up to the compiler. The usual rule was that anything up to 2 words in size was copied. Since the called function couldn't change the value, it didn't matter.

This avoids philosophical gyrations. You want a rule that says you can copy ints and floats, for performance reasons. Trying to reach that via type theory makes it harder. It's an optimization.
Hi thanks for the feedback, do not hesitate to open issues to request new services and allow me to easily track them ;)
That would just move jobs/companies to cheaper areas.
Eh, that "$5 in Africa" pill is often also "$10 in Canada or the EU." Oversight/certification costs money but that's only a small part of the explanation for why pharmaceuticals sometimes have far higher retail prices in the USA than in other developed countries.
> What languages is it largely meant to replace/improve on.

I think it's great for any problem area where you'd instinctively reach for C. System utilities, bare metal development, etc. Stuff where you care about the precise layout of memory but would prefer that a simple but non-obvious mistake didn't end up as a high-profile CVE.

> What languages is it largely meant to replace/improve on.

C. It has C's straightforward machine model in mind, like C its memory behaviours are entirely predictable, it's entirely explicit about error handling (no hidden paths of errors exiting functions as in C++).

It improves on C by adding strict checking to make managing memory safely and avoiding race conditions tractable problems.
I talk to my mentor and to my business coach.
THE DEFINITIVE WEB MARKETING GUIDE
For me, I think it's not so much NIH syndrome but resentment at pricing among analytics products that seems calibrated to extract as much value from the customer as possible, which they can do because there is so little direct competition and because the ROI is usually still positive.

It's a perfectly rational pricing strategy, of course, but it can sometimes feel like one of those economics experiments: "A colleague receives 100 dollars and is asked to split it between him and yourself. If you disagree with the split, neither of you gets anything. Your colleague proposes to give you 10 dollars and keep 90 himself. Do you choose to accept the 10 dollars, or would you prefer both of you get nothing?"

Also, your examples are about ancillary utilities, but let's say you're a data scientist and you decide to build your own A/B testing system instead of using one of the existing services out there. If you add up all the dev time and maintenance time the homegrown system will probably be way more expensive, but on the other hand building it might teach you a bunch of intangible skills that make you a better experimenter and that could be worth the expense if the company expects employees to stick around for a while.

Having said that, personally I still prefer to just pay for something. But I'm not at all stunned when other people do decide to roll their own tools.
Riak TS 1.5 Release Notes
>The author was giving two meals a day and often got home late in the evenings.

"An automated feeder would save me one chore per day, and I wouldn’t have to worry about getting home late in the evenings."

You seem to have ignored "save me one chore per day" which is what my original comment was in response too. Occasional late meal is not a big deal at all, you don't need to go about inventing ridiculous machines for that.
Isn't this exactly what the article explains and clarifies?
I don't love the conclusion, a single Fibonacci benchmark is fairly light evidence to blanket state Crystal is as fast as C. It's also fairly toothless on comparison of other languages.
I'm not a lawyer, nor do I speak for my employer, but yeah: you should strongly consider changing the name and branding. I like the idea and the sentiment behind it, but I think it could be done just as easily without using Google's IP.
Chef is the wrong tool for the job use sccm even if you still want to use chef as a front end have the sccm agents installed and use it.

This is a tooling issue, dont expect to use a tool that was hacked together for all intents a purposes rather than a native solution and get good results.
True.

That's why there are often component libraries that duplicate the JS driven logic of Bootstrap compoents, like reactstrap and react-bootstrap.

Those often remain incomplete though.
Works in PostgreSQL 9.6.1

postgres> SELECT extract(epoch from to_timestamp('2037-11-13 10:20:19', 'YYYY-MM-DD hh24:mi:ss'));
date_part
------------
2141720419
(1 row)

postgres> SELECT extract(epoch from to_timestamp('2039-11-13 10:20:19', 'YYYY-MM-DD hh24:mi:ss'));
date_part
------------
2204792419
(1 row)
I know it sounds cruel and I didn't feel quite right doing it but this is why I walk around my cats like they're not there. After a couple close calls where I almost fell it seemed like it was worth a shot. I do slow down a bit so I carry/push them rather than kick when they're actually underfoot though. It only took a couple bonks to the nose and a time or two of being carried by my foot a few inches into the air to teach them not to do it anymore. And if you're concerned about affection they still rub against me when I'm standing still or sitting.
If you're wondering what kind of traffic #25 on the front page brings in:

https://twitter.com/GoogleBlade/status/811681152046141441

About 1,000 uniques so far, 20 signups.
As I told the robotics people at Stanford who were talking about something similar on the moon in the 1980s, "how soon can you do it in Arizona?" The machines sent to Mars so far are very small and wimpy. Because they're semi-teleoperated, and have very limited solar power, they're really slow. If you want to do any high-power activity on Mars, you'll probably have to send a nuclear reactor.
I'd like to think that my government team is trying to approach this the right way.

I work on a small team of about 12 within 18F (part of the General Services Administration). We are creating cloud.gov, a Platform as a Service (think Heroku, Google App Engine, IBM Bluemix) for the Federal Government. The key is to remove the government compliance burden from federal government development teams while also making modern technology accessible and understandable.

We come from private sector for a two year civil service. We are super lean and all of our work is open source (github.com/18F).

Note that cloud.gov is only seeking certification for FISMA Moderate impact level, so a lot of DoD systems (such as anything classified) cannot be hosted on our PaaS.
Cats have also been known to resort to terrorism, viz., climbing onto high shelves and systematically knocking fragile items to the floor until their demands are met.
That is a good deal! A couple of years ago it was $500 but radiologists here are notoriously overpaid racketeers.
It would be really nice if the addons/extensions page showed which addons were listed as compatible and which weren't. I might thus make a decision to disable/delete an addon or two that were blocking me from using multiprocess firefox. As it is, I have no idea if my firefox is using multiprocess at all. All I know is that I use a lot of addons and I'm probably not, then, using multiprocess.
Current GPUs are not SIMD. They are classic examples of MIMD (multiple instruction multiple data), with multiple concurrent processing units. SIMD is common in vector processing units, but GPUs do more than that at this point.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIMD