skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They still contain information, though. They say when you're talking on Signal. Matched with someone else's messages at about the right frequency to indicate a conversation, they give a pretty decent idea of who you're talking to.
Looks like it searches the filenames, I am referring to file contents. Does it support that?
Principles by Ray Dalio
They actually are proper arrays in C++ [1], although, as usual, they decay to pointers faster than an unstable particle.

[1]: https://godbolt.org/g/ZWISCu
The decentralized approach removes a hard binding between the app provider and the user. When you post to Twitter, you add content to their site. When you post using the P2P web, you add content to a site you own. You retain ownership of the content; the content URL remains independent of any service; and the content remains local. You can move a P2P site to a new frontend application, and you can switch to a different aggregator for a global view. For that matter, you can skip the aggregator service, and use the pure P2P arch, and even crawl locally.

It's quite a bit more than "mak[ing] the client be your web server." It's about independent publishing.
I use Rust for web 1 year already and I can say it's awesome. Try.
> Pick one

Maybe I'm spoiled with who I've been working with, but even when you do something for free, you still try to do a good job while you're at it.

For instance, if you're a landscaper, and you're doing a yard for a neighbor for a favor, you still break out the edger to to the extra mile on what you're doing.
When is a Tor exit not an exit
Show HN: PyPI server for serving Python packages out of GitHub
Hear hear. Down with silos.

I just hope matrix ends up working better than xmpp.
Lua isn't missed, read the article again. it is just that it just that Lua appears in exactly 0% of the job offers on indeed.com.
Hence "some access".

A king 1000 years ago would have no conception of what a shower is. They would take baths, but even then, that'd be a seasonal/yearly thing.
The tools which are meant for employee concerns send the message ( email trigger ) to HR department.
Dalio is the founder of Bridgewater.

Dalio is worth ~$16 bn.

Principles is an educative read, even if you don't agree with much or all of it.
Concerning the HURD support: Is there an image with GNU Hurd instead of the Linux kernel?
The founder of FedEx once saved the company by taking its last $5,000 and turning it into $32,000 by gambling in Las Vegas.
Several prominent open sources are written primarily in C++. TensorFlow is a good example.
In particular, I remember it was the description of Hal's father effectively ending his tennis career on the court that made it impossible for me _not_ to finish--around p170 or 180.
It seems like that case is missing a piece. Where is the final analysis showing the results of choosing to race or not? Are there separate instructor notes somewhere?
> However, ? for Option is a bit controversial

Because people wouldn't expect it to return due to behaviour of existing languages yet that's what it does in Rust?
"Right-wing governments had no interest in educating the workers or investing in anything other than the landowners' exports."

Gee, no bias there.
Use "try" or "?" if possible, pattern matching otherwise.
"Essentially, we're going to fail. It happens. Might as well get it out of the way.
Secondly, failure averse cultures don't actually prevent failures, and they have a tendency to squash innovation."

That's a very interesting philosophy ... I wonder how that idea, in general, relates to clusters ?

I've seen organizations pour lots of time and resources and brain power into chasing nines on their uptime and they all have outages. And those outages are particularly painful due to the complexity that had to be added - complexity that sometimes grows non-linear in relation to the "nines gained".

I've always leaned towards building dumb things that failed simply. They're going to fail anyway ...
I've been looking at it with some puzzlement too. It's almost like one of those experiments where they work psych tricks on the subjects.

Except it's on a whole rather sizable country. People who consume mainstream media have been worked into nervous wrecks with no plausible reason.
This is from 2013 so in terms of recovery years it is a bit dated...

But the first three questions all posit that unemployment was rising, and that reemployment was not occurring which is(and was) belied by this graph -https://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS14000000
In fact, Dalio himself just a couple years ago contacted Bridgewater's clients to tell them the firm fucked up, had miscalculated things and was over-exposed to duration risk (basically meaning they owned too many bonds, as you say). The studying of this risk from bonds and how to "mitigate" it is ongoing at Bridgewater. Kinda hard to recommend a portfolio from a guy who admits it is broken and is still trying to fix it.

I've seen chollida1 comments in other finance-related threads and I think he knows his stuff. On this one though I agree with you, that portfolio has some serious issues and I would not feel comfortable recommending it to the average person as is.

Here is an article talking about Ray Dalio recognizing this "all weather" portfolio was bad and they needed to make corrections: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-08-14/dalio-pat...
After a year of experiments i realized that machine learning and big data pipelines are inseparable. So at first i was thinking R/Python is the greatest. And it might be until you need to do more that a few isolated models. At that point i reverted to building the pipeline parts with Spring Java + InMemory DataGrids because there is so many options.
The Ethics of Madness, Larry Niven. It sure has a different vibe without the spaceships.
Google Cloud Architect Certification
Which NP tasks? ("Some" NP tasks are already possible in polynomial time)
I don't think "services" == the distribution. How else does that square with the GPL?

http://openjdk.java.net/legal/gplv2+ce.html

Specifically: "You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the rights granted herein."
If NASA had flown 135 Apollo missions they might have lost some. Due to the small sample size, we'll never know for sure whether it was actually safer than the Shuttle or if they just got lucky.
Ok, you have to love the visual pun in this image : https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/tEI5W_27WhDMteZhxakApTm3Gzk... its a self driving truck carrying self driving cars :-)

It got me thinking about moving large fleets of self driving cars by small numbers of individuals without using a truck. And that left me with the vision of people on motorcycles herding cars along the freeway toward their winter grazing grounds in Arizona. :-)
This does somewhat break Signal's security model..
Could this be in any way akin to the shutdown of Lavabit? I know it's not the same type of company, but if there was pressure to put back doors in or any sort of compromise, I would support the action.

If not, then it's a really bad way to shut up shop. OK the source is out there but given the holiday season people might have appreciated a little warning.
The entire argument is that "automation didnt get invented recently so how can it be the cause of a recent phenomenon". This seems pretty weak to me. Maybe automation has finally automated all (or enough) of the jobs that any human can be trained to do with minimal education, so there aren't any jobs for a percentage of the population anymore?

Assuming that people who lose their jobs to automation will find new ones requires every person be able to perform some sort of new job. But with automation doing most physical tasks and now some mental ones, is it so crazy to think that the bar of competency required to do anything worth paying for is being raised?
It's not the end of vim. I highly doubt NeoVim is going to replace it at all.
So, Uber:

Bloomberg says that their Q3 net revenue is 1.7B, with a loss of 800M. That makes their overall profit margin approximately -50%.

To say that this is not a good sign is a significant understatement. Yearly figures would be about $5.5B in revenue, loss of about $3B, so expenditures of $8.5B.

Let's say that $2B in expenditures are essentially waste or research projects with no very immediate prospect of return. That leaves it with a loss of -$1B on revenues of $5.5B.

Any further expenditure cutting is going to result in loss of revenue as well -- it's super hard to see how it could conceivably get to +$1B in net profit. It's also super hard to see how it can really substantially increase its revenues without yet further cutting its margins. There are no large markets left for it to enter, so how does it entice more ridership except by cutting fares?

But even if it did manage to get to $1B or $2B in profit, that's not enough. It's allegedly a $75B company!

Uber stipulates that it shouldn't have to register its cars as self-driving, because they aren't advanced enough to meet the definition. It compares itself to Tesla: automated lane-keeping + adaptive cruise control. If we take Uber at its word, that is not a good sign for it to dig itself out of its terrible revenue situation via being first to market with automated vehicles.

My guess: Uber's investors have realized that when the music stops, there are about half as many chairs as people. They're trying to get it to pull together some kind of IPO so they can dump at least some of their losses on public investors, and Uber is trying to desperately spin along the pixie dust stories until it can get itself into some shape to IPO. That means avoiding California's reporting requirements for driverless cars because only by claiming that they have a viable automated car program do they have some kind of story about how they might eventually make a profit.

The sad thing is that there is almost certainly a very good, modestly-sized company in Uber that plugs along making $100M a year in profit on $1B in revenue as a taxi company. But they can't go back down to that company anymore.
You're absolutely right, and the data doesn't allow to split between api vs core implementation.
R and Python are not your only options. Check out the article for some other languages people are using.

R and Python are probably the two with the most support/community materials around them - lots of tutorials, libraries, guides etc.
Companies in the US essentially can kill somebody "accidentally" and nobody from the company will go to jail in the majority of cases. There has to be some sort of obvious scheme or negligence on the part of the company leadership to result in somebody going to prison for anything more than a trivial amount of time.

So people can complain about regulations, but they are essentially the primary method we have to prevent companies from killing or hurting people accidentally. Yes there are plenty of regulations that are actually not related to human safety that are put there by other companies for the purpose of trying to close the door behind them after they get into a strong position, but for things like cars that are essentially interacting with intersections, crosswalks, bikelanes, rail crossings, stopped cars, etc, having some burden on the company who wants to put machines into these situations run by algorithms being held accountable by way of forcing transparency, that seems pretty damned reasonable to me and many other people. So Uber is being pretty lame in this situation.
Show HN: BladeSearch (re-brand of Google Blade which launched yesterday)
I can do this with aliases in .bash_profile right?
Yes, it seems like a good choice of algorithm. And it seems like the implementation is also decent - they looked at that as well. It's a useful report and kudos to Open Technology Fund for funding it and to Matrix for making it public!

Still, this is only one piece of the overall security of Riot, so I'm still interested in knowing if there's any work going on looking at the bigger picture.
About a week.

I launched DesignerJobs (https://www.designerjobs.co) about three weeks ago: posted on HN a friday afternoon and got like 5 upvotes. I thought that was going to be it but someone picked it up on ProductHunt the next day and it ended up ranking #4 on there all weekend. I got plenty of traffic from there, realized I wasn't collecting emails (oops) or had links to social media (duh) and rushed to deploy the features. Got my first customer on Monday! From there, I contacted a lot of companies with open positions for designers and eventually added more sales, one after another. So far things are going pretty well, I've added features, companies and I'm trying to maintain growth.

The biggest challenge for me was/is marketing. I'm finding it's actually pretty easy to code and design anything, but marketing/reaching out/selling whatever you have is what truly separates having a website from having a business.
Having been in environments that still needed to support JRE6 and be secure, the support contract from Oracle is actually not horribly priced and is actively fixing CVE's that are not available to the public.
And looking at embedded OSes, L4, sandboxing in Apple, Google and Microsoft OSes, the future direction is quite clear.
No, Le Corbusier and all that.
also your prompt with "Name's MacBook Pro" is way too long. Shorter that thing!
Gaza Sky Geeks is the haven of gaza's most creative, resilient entrepreneurs and what it gives and offers slams the door in the face of adversities that life in Gaza brings in these promising people's way on a daily basis and opens instead many other doors for opportunities and abilities. Your support serves a noble cause!
See also: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=GIB
A security expert found a 0-Day flaw in NETGEAR WNR2000 Routers
Simplicity. It's just Vim, but with less suck.

Spacemacs is a huge complex mass of software on top of another. I could not digest it.

But, if you're already happy and productive with Spacemacs, it's unlikely you'll gain too much with Neovim.
My impression was that wasm doesn't provide GC. Since Scala needs GC, Rust seems better positioned to have a first mover advantage.
No, but what about locate, grep and find?

Locate is the fastest, find is the slowest and grep is the most complex but also the most versatile one of these since you can use regexes.

It's the shell and you can use anything you want.
Does Signal support reproducible builds, at least? Real question, I don't know.
The product you linked is called 'Teleport Pro' which allows you to do website mirroring for offline browsing.

The link that has been originally posted is a CLI based tool which has nothing to do with website mirroring.
memory safety isn't the only advantage.

0 cost abstractions do matter a bit. In general abstractions let you do high level programming in lower level languages.

The type system matters a lot.

I used to do a lot of scripting. One thing I really missed was having a good static type system. These days I miss ADT enums in all languages.

Scripting is already moving in the direction of being more type safe (typescript, python type annotations), which is awesome, but I'd love to use something like Rust in that sphere.
As a former ClusterHQ employee who had been with the company longer than our CEO, I should be able to shed some light on this. The plan was to raise round A funding two years ago (which we did) and then raise round B funding now before becoming profitable 2 to 3 years from now. Venture capitalists have become far more risk adverse. We all thought that round B funding would happen, but it fell apart at the last minute and instead of announcing round B funding, Mark announced a shutdown.
Contra the article, the rich in Silicon Valley very much know those poorer people exist. They're the maids, cooks, landscapers, restaurant workers, car detailers, construction crews, etc. They're not invisible. They exist, just not - to their clients or customers - as people. Replace them with robots, and the millionaires will only notice a difference in cost or service levels. The idea that somebody's livelihood just went poof is of no consequence to them.
The article addresses that explicitly. Some questions in the "Anti-FAQ" are:

"Maybe we've finally reached the point where there's no work left to be done, or where all the jobs that people can easily be retrained into can be even more easily automated."

"What if what's changed is that we're out of new jobs to create? What if we've already got enough hot dog buns, for every kind of hot dog bun there is in the labor market, and now AI is automating away the last jobs and the last of the demand for labor?"

"How about timescales longer than ten years? There was one class of laborers permanently unemployed by the automobile revolution, namely horses. There are a lot fewer horses nowadays because there is literally nothing left for horses to do that machines can't do better; horses' marginal labor productivity dropped below their cost of living. Could that happen to humans too, if AI advanced far enough that it could do all the labor?"

and then there are responses to each of these.

Do you think the responses are unsatisfying, and if so, could you explain why in some more detail?
Damn I really like those glitchy visuals.
Errr, wait what?

Firstly, to say there's no debt, monetary or otherwise, to someone who believed in your company enough to hand over their own money (or money in their control) to back you is just pure arrogance.

Secondly, there absolutely is debt. When a company goes into administration the assets are sold to pay out those who hold equity in the company. They're literally owed debt.

EDIT: To clarify for those responding saying that equity does not constitute debt...

Creditors and investors are different, absolutely. It is also correct that investors are typically paid last during administration (although investors may form agreements to come before other investors). Nonetheless, during administration, the administrator determines how much money the investors are "owed", which is literally the definition of debt.
From the article:

"For both sides to work together effectively, each has to recognize the challenges of the other."

Why? In order for both sides to work together effectively, the business (non-profit) has to anticipate and fulfill the need of the consumers (donors).

They're basically saying that not only aren't the donors giving enough, they need to be educated into changing their reasons and motivations for giving.
> cancel the insurance and get your money back if possible.

Not an option.

>no leverage with HR,

This process almost feels like an organized scam and well thought of.

Generally the company is very vocal about the "process orientation" and "well defined policies".

But, in this case, it took quite an effort to take them out of denial mode, and now that they are out of denial mode, they just do not respond.
Just wanted to update you guys that I took everyone's good advice, and changed the name of this project from GoogleBlade.com to BladeSearch.com.

I'm sorry for any confusion I may have caused in making you think it was a service of Google's. I viewed it as a tribute to one of my favorite services of theirs (custom search engines) and let that cloud my legal perspective.

Anyway, I didn't hear from Google, but also didn't want them to have to engage their legal team, so I went ahead and rebranded today.

Lesson learned, and thanks again everyone for the great feedback yesterday.
Congress claims Snowden has been in contact with Russian intelligence
Google’s Secret Strategy for Self-Driving Vehicle Research
> These kinds of irrational responses in response to a Clinton win would have been openly mocked and criticized by the same media that celebrates them on the left.

Yes because Clinton is a responsible, experienced politician.

Your comment only makes sense if one believes that there is no difference between Trump and Clinton, which truly is irrational. That is, to hold that belief, one must ignore a gigantic mountain of objectively verifiable evidence to the contrary.

If you think this is a partisan thing, you're wrong. I know a lot of life-long Republicans who are upset at Trump's victory, and fearful for what it means for the nation.
Yeah, it's a bad name. Don't think I could get my parents or colleagues to use it.
More because Option is not really intended to handle errors while Result and ? are.
> (as there is no difference between a totalitarian government from an all-owning all-contracting corporation), even though they're easily tricked into condoning them.

Law works because everyone concent and choose to follow it. If you have such single non-violent corporation then there is nothing stops from people to just walk away.
Well the theory is that those new larger markets to enter will be in adjacent industries involving movement of nonhuman goods.
Yes. It's a perfect storm of coincidences, basically. It's a combination of timing + a tiny feature.

Let's take a step back. Macros 1.1 is RFC 1681: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/1681-macr...

See the section saying "The initial implementation of librustc_macro is proposed to be incredibly bare bones:" it really is very, very small. So it landed, and while there was some questions that came up, people migrated to it, and it works well.

22 days ago, it was to be reviewed: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35900#issuecomment-...

However, two things happened: one, the Mozilla all-hands in Hawaii, which shook things up, but secondly, that meant a lot of people, including one of the reviewers, took PTO around that time, to actually see some of the islands. That includes someone who was on the reviewers list. So in general, "oh hey this is waiting on one person who forgot to check a box but isn't reachable now" is awkward.

Luckily, in this case, we know that it was just forgetting to check the box; Felix did not have any objections that we were aware of. So we decided to sign off for him, and put it into FCP. This happened so that FCP technically passed the deadline for 1.15, but given how important it is to ship, we're planning on nominating it for a backport, and don't anticipate complaints.

So: tiny feature, code wise. Big win for being stable. Procedural mishap involving awkward scheduling. All these things played into it. Make sense?
I guess indeed doesn't represent how many people write ML code in large companies like FB, Google, MSFT, IBM.
I think another good metrics would be number of LoC in ML projects on github.
FWIW, Array.prototype.some() would probably be more idiomatic here.
Humor suitable only for the intellectually elite
I honestly believe that the HN community is good largely because the website is so terrible. The buggy and unappealing UX turns off most low effort users.
I love JS (pretty unpopular opinion here on HN) and I love Rust also and I'm not convinced using Rust on front-end tasks would have any benefits. Yet, I strongly disagree with you on this point :

> Rust is a low level systems programming language, it's very suboptimal for high level front end code from productivity standpoint

Rust's type system is wonderful, and it's a real productivity boost. Fortunately people at Facebook developed an equivalent for JavaScript [1] because living without it would be really hard for me now.
Furthermore, Rust offers a lot of syntactic sugar that makes it feel like a really high level language (compared to C, Go or even JavaScript pre-ES6 for instance).

>it's advantages (mem safety with 0 cost abstractions) don't really matter in frontend

It's indeed one of Rust selling point (especially for people coming from a C background) but it's not the only one. My favorite being the data-race free parallelism. I don't know the current status of multi threading in wasm, but being able to take advantage of all the cores of mobile devices could really help front-end frameworks.

[1]: http://flowtype.org, it's not inspired by Rust but inspired by OCaml, which also inspired Rust.