skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It was actually 50 minutes. Here is what I could turn up:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=599161
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=5991...

I remember it was patched and out by debian right around Christmas; quite the present. This bug made me feel very helpless. I recall there being more information around the circumstances of its discovery on the Xen mailing list.
How do you manage the legalities, work visas etc. Many countries are quite strict about entering the country depending on whether you are entering for work or pleasure purposes.
Webpack option suggested for Rails 5.1
Hackers Stole $31M from Central Bank of Russia
تور لحظه آخری کیش ورود ۱۵ آذر – تور کیش پاییز ۹۵
There are still a lot of MUDs out there, which I'd consider to be multi-player extensions of games like Zork. Some still draw 500+ paying accounts logged in at peak times, and have characters that are 25+ years old, like Gemstone IV (play.net/gs4).

I tend to explain it as "World of Warcraft without graphics", but "rapid-paced AD&D" is a fair approximation, too. The medium gives the people running the show a lot of flexibility in how they guide collaborative stories - no need to wait on art assets!
Facebook does not want to lose revenue from advertisers that submit fake news articles.

I saw the BS News extension it checks each link for citing known fake news sites in their article.

It is not practical as I keep seeing new fake news sites popping up from nowhere. Just register a domain, install Wordpress, write some articles and then pay for advertising on Facebook.

Fake news sites got Trump elected by saying false things like the Pope supports him. It is serious when people only use Facebook as their only news site and read and believe without checking the facts first.

If I were to make a fake news site detector I'd have it search Snopes and Politifact and others to see if it has been already reported as false.

Basically the way it ends up is a new way to censor the news using AI.

Suppose instead of a black list of sites they use a white list of trusted sites? Then block any new sites until they can verify them as trusted?
Anyone here used jsawk that could compare and contrast to jq?
The admin UI was really good and they started to strip features away from it one by one and now it is disabled. It even could do simple graphs and was very useful for debugging.
We have a Makerbot Replicator 1 in our Makerspace and it actually works well and is very useful. But we modified it quite a bit (mainly with an enclosed and heated print volume and also a more sturdy build platform). A lot of the quality of a 3D-print comes from the software and Makerbot actually did a good job there.

I also don't think the parts are too weak. Certainly, machined aluminium or lasercut MDF is more robust, but for a lot of things I find that 3D printed ABS or PLA is plenty strong enough ;)

I very much agree on the usefulness of laser cutters! Unfortunately they are too big for our space :(
OAR is not REST
Supply and demand aren't disconnected from productivity.
Do you mean unusable in an environment where you are not a privileged user? Like locked down work/corp environments?
I think that we hackers tend to focus on tech-oriented looks at why things succeed or fail. I propose another idea: that we need education of 3D modeling in schools, at a basic level, in order to encourage more people to understand the possibilities.

In middle school we'd learn various things about art, art history, art techniques, and while they weren't comprehensive, they provided a basic level of appreciation for art. As an example, if I hadn't learned about techniques like shading or perspective drawing, I would've thought that they were impossible for a layman like me to attempt.

For most people (and by "most people" I mean anecdotally most people I know), 3d modeling and 3d printing seems to be at this unapproachable level of complexity. If we can show kids the simpler side of 3d modeling, there would be a much greater consumer interest in 3d printing.
I think this is an strong idea, and I don't see any issues with the proposed implementation using google analytics.

Certainly it seems more practical than any of the proposed alternatives suggested here. (Eg, micropayments. Come on, that's not even plausible...)
The tooling is easy - but where do you get remote gigs that pay well?
Apple looks to build manufacturing unit in India
Amazing tool. Thanks!
Oh, well in that case I'll get reading! Thanks so much :)
Texas still does fingerprints at the DMV. I'm amazed how many texans have no clue until they renew.
At this point? Save up for a new one, pay a hundred times its cost to a lawyer to maybe have it back, or start a revolution and overthrow the government.
5 Crazy Lemon Kitchen Gadgets That You NEED to SEE
I'm the owner of the project, would love to hear any critique or ideas, thanks
"When people tell you something is wrong, they are most often right. When they tell you how to fix it, they are always wrong"
~ Neil Gaiman
So I think programming will eventually become a tool used by everyone rather than something for only for programmers and other tech-savvy individuals. It'll be something that everyone uses the same way basic arithmetic is a tool that everyone uses these days. These days programming is reserved for the few because in order to program you have to learn a language with very specific grammar and the level of abstraction is still quite low. The underlying operations being expressed by current languages are not themselves intuitively hard to understand but the average person is prevented from doing so because of the language barrier. The level of abstraction that the average programmer is working with is moving continuously higher. In the past there was a time when the average programmer was working at the level of assembly language but today the average programmer is working at much higher levels of abstraction. There are obvious disadvantages to current visual programming systems as you've described but it may be the case that we just haven't developed the right abstractions and interfaces that work best for visual programming.
Skills give humans the edge over automation
Samsung Galaxy S8 vs. Samsung Galaxy S7
In my opinion the magnitude of these problems is massively increased by locked down environments where playing with something has time costs for multiple people. The time for someone to play on their machine vs the time fire b that someone to work with an administrator to request, create and test.
The same reasons that make a midsize city more attractive than a cornfield also make a large city more attractive than a midsize city.

As a rule, larger population center enables more and better cultural options, more and better education options, more and better industries and choice of jobs - There's a zillion of things that aren't feasible in a 100k city simply due to lack of scale.
Thunderbird: Mozilla looking to drop support (2015)
Looks great, like a visually pleasing version of Prograph.

I remember my arms starting to ache after a few days of using the mouse constantly when working with Prograph. So some keyboard shortcuts would be recommended.

http://www.andescotia.com/examples/
Ahhh, you know riot is bad performance wise?

I am sure riot's performance is not bad many real world apps. but the devs would certainly prefer the faster one so they won't run into problems later.
Taiwan called Trump to congratulate him on winning the election? This is ground for war, unlike that one time Obama sold military weapons to Taiwan.
Depends on your perspective, and what you consider problems.

If it's about not housing enough people in the major cities, then yes, it can probably solve that. Providing some quality level of housing for every pricing point ... well sure. That can be done by deregulating. We all know we will NOT like quite a few of those quality levels though, and some will be bad enough to make actual victims. For health reasons, for preventable accidents reasons, for crime safety reasons ...

If you're talking about doing that while maintaining current standards of housing and standards of traffic, crowdedness of the streets, etc - of course not. Can't be done, of course.

Housing everyone at a decent standard, lower than now, but decent ... well regulation (ie. shifting regulation from local to federal) can do that.

I think that that is by far the best option. Shifting permitting from local level to at least state, better yet, federal level.

The best option would be to provide distributed jobs again, of course. But that can't happen because, well it's complicated [1].

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lYJI0cokQ5k
Have you tried the new cli and Linux compatibility in Windows 10?
but you are allowed... one of the big myths is that there was a universal policy. in fact the policy applied to only city dwellers in big congested cities. villagers and ethnic minorities did not have the restriction. the policy applied to like only 30pc of households
Except Sketchup can't handle exotic shapes like the "circle".
Stephen Hawking: This is the most dangerous time for our planet
Dragonball. They sometimes charge up one attack over several episodes.
Computer security is Dead
Tried using in production, failed really badly performance-wise (granted, it wasn't a good fit - cardinality was high). Replaced with PostgreSQL and I'm seeing 2+ orders of magnitude improvement on c4.large vs r4.8xlarge before..
I still frequently end up crawling back to OpenScad. It is often quicker than the rather click business of setting up constraints. Just don't ask me to make a rounded corner in it.
Because Javascript doesn't have macros.
The original blog didn't blog about what was wrong with C or C++. It blogged about other languages blindly picking up design decisions from C even though they don't really have a reason to.

And Rust has been consistently delivering software with performance on par with or faster than C counter parts. http://blog.burntsushi.net/ripgrep/ is a recent example. Servo is a more long term one.
Cdist 4.4.0 has been released
CSIR NET Coaching: Study Online
> C spread like wildfire in the 80's,

Maybe on US, I only got my first contact with C in 1992, via Turbo C 2.0.

Before that already had used multiple languages and was using Turbo Pascal 6.0 by the time I learned C.

Then again, I hardly knew anyone with access to UNIX, my first contact being Xenix in 1994.

This type of experience was quite common in Portugal, who had money to buy expensive UNIX workstations....

Also the fact of being proprietary, well I usually paid for my tools, before FOSS started to be a thing.

And on the same place where they had Turbo C 2.0, they also just got Turbo C++ 1.0.

So there was a tool that had the type system that allowed me to bend C to be more like Turbo Pascal, provided I cared to use the said type system improvements.

Which lead to me never using C++ as an improved C compiler, rather taking advantage of C++ type system to ensure my arrays and strings were properly bound checked, and IO was done safely.

Oh and taking part on C++'s side on the whole C vs C++ USENET debates, since 1994. Or type safety in systems programming vs C.

So these HN and Reddit discussions regarding the C's unsuitability to write safe software, are hardly anything new to me.
That's disappointing, I was hoping for a robust defense of your stance and I don't believe I didn't treat you with dignity but I'm sorry if there was a misstep on my part.

p.s. I'm a big fan of Google, they helped me to quit being an employee for good, but I appreciate the advice :)
This is one thing that Stratasys totally missed out on. They are heavily reliant on support material and other consumables, which is great for making arbitrary shapes but not for cheap production.
How did the Supreme Court reason that? It seems to be a violation of Amendment 7.
Golang isn't a bad option...but neither is (modern) PHP, Python, or Ruby. (Or .net, JVM, nodejs...) Each has some specific advantages, and that absolutely includes PHP.

PHP right now is in an interesting space: It's very stable, it has an enormous ecosystem, it has some extremely strong frameworks and tooling, the syntax has stopped being egregiously bad, it's starting to get quite fast, and the PHP request/response model is very attractive for some purposes, and avoids an entire class of bugs which crops up with, eg, nodejs.

If you're doing something where PHP is appropriate (which is a lot of stuff), and you're familiar with it, you're going to be extremely productive. Switching to golang (especially if not familiar with it) is like deciding that instead of going to the supermarket and buying a loaf of bread, you're going to buy a farm and figure out how to grow wheat. You have the ability to end up with a better product, but there's no promise you will, and it'll be a lot more work.

> Apparently the client has some server side operations which are particular heavy and mentioned that php/python/ruby are just too slow

Of course if the client requires you to use golang, then sure, use golang. But it makes me wonder about the design the client is imagining. If your web server is trying to do very intensive calculations as part of the request/response cycle, you're probably doing something very, very wrong. But if you're not doing that, why does your need to do intensive calculation impact your choice of frontend? What's stopping them from having a lightweight frontend which queues up jobs in a task queue, and then have workers written in golang or C or whatever? And then maybe a websocket server to feed results back to the browser as they arrive? Where did they get the idea that a project needed a single language for every feature?
isn't this documentation a bit dated?

AFAIK as of Win10 hard and soft links exist, and also junctions, which are a third, similar but different concept.
First of all, this is for statistics based papers, not just "technical papers". The "R" in the URL and also in the language itself shows that focus. So if you have to first download R (and RStudio) you may not be the target audience.

The benefit of RMarkdown publications is that they contain the code to reproduce every single step in the argument - as far as it is based on data.

Examples from me, made for a course on Coursera some time ago (so especially in the 2nd example the focus wasn't on the result, effort for data cleaning was deliberately kept to a minimum):

- https://rpubs.com/Noseshine/74191

- https://rpubs.com/Noseshine/79343

Every single line of code necessary to produce the graphs and tables and summary statistics is in there. If you get the source RMarkdown file you can run it yourself. The graphics and tables are not images created somewhere else!

Usually you will have the code in an appendix at the very end, but every single thing in the document based on data is calculated using code somewhere in the document itself.

The main target for these kinds of publications are statistics-heavy papers. Usually you just read the conclusions of the authors and some summary statistics but you don't have access a) to the data they used and b) to the methods they used on the data. RMarkdown documents provide b) and (hopefully) an embedded link to a) (in the form of source code that when executed downloads it into your R environment).

The background story is that not infrequently you find studies (in all kinds of statistics-heavy fields from medicine to psychology) where the summary conclusions are based on faulty premises, faulty data collection/selection, faulty statistical methods. If all you have is a LaTeX or Word or whatever (passive) summary document you cannot find any of those problems unless you keep bugging the authors for a copy of their data and their code used to analyse it, which is a lot of work and was too often altogether unsuccessful. So there is a push in science to get people and organizations to publish more than just the summary.

Another advantage: You can produce interactive (online) versions, for example showing a graph where you can change parameters interactively, but show a few static example graphs in the static document version.

As for just the format:

The reason to compete with LaTeX has been given right here on HN a few times when LaTeX was discussed: It is far more difficult and has plenty of bugs and difficulties. A long time ago I wrote my thesis in it and had no major issues, but I don't know why I would want to write anything in it now. Things like RMarkdown are much less flexible - and orders of magnitude easier, both to write and to debug.

As for the competition with Word, text-based formats have the advantage to be easily "processable" using other tools.
That seems to be their uncommunicated plan - to attract users to open source version and then remove features to offer just with enterprise product. They have done it with clustering support where after attracting people with promises they then removed it from open source version. Grafana as a replacement? It really does different things.
Yeah that's why I take advantage of the student discount that taking a class at the local technical college offers and get full solid works for $170/year.
When stating that nobody wants to touch browsers with a ten foot pole, I meant that nobody wants to contribute to browser development unless they are paid very very well.
It stayed at v5.1 (with some v5.2 features that don't break 5.1 code) because Mike Pall disagreed with some v5.2 features: swapping `setfenv` for `_ENV`, and some details of the bundled bitlib.

He also criticized 128 bits interpreter values mandated by the support of 64 bits integer in v5.3. These take twice as much cache space and damage performance.
What type of printers was he using?
Can you explain? High demand causes employees to be more productive?
What's the point of 3D printing a bad gun in a country where in some states you can go to Walmart and buy a nice gun there, for a fraction of a cost? And it's not like you could 3D print ammo.
Can anyone verify the claims on their production setup? I'm always a bit weary of these announcements. It's easier to get big numbers like that on benchmarks than in real usage scenarios, has usually been my experience.
No. The solution is to setup a Ministry of Truth like what Facebook is trying to do. People are too stupid and must be protected from reading #FakeNews because they can not think for themselves. Let the corporations and the government think for them.
Those who do understand it, just use it and ignore everyone else.
I agree, but this is achievable in other languages in the same way it is for Python - simply output something interesting via a package or library. First practical we have students drawing shapes in Java and crudely animating them.
It's not just "fake news" in the sense of stories that are made up from "whole cloth" so to speak... we have an equally large problem with "fake news" which is nominally real, but has been spun, distorted and tweaked so as to promote on agenda or another. Mix "fake" news and "fake" news together and the whole mix is just one big fester cesspool of malfeasance.

It really makes it hard to know what to believe. I mean, if you read a post from the "Denver Tribune" you know that's fake, since there is no such outlet. But if you read something on CNN or MSNBC, why would you believe it when you know about the various shady schemes going on where journalists and politicians conspire with each other behind the scenes, etc? Or if a paper reports "numbers" (jobs data, climate data, etc.) from the government, why believe those number are real?

The more you think about it, the harder it is to take anything at face value. In the end, it takes a lot of work, that most people probably aren't willing to do, to try and filter this stuff out. I mean, you can read/watch/listen to news from multiple sources, and look for the commonalities, or analyze news with an eye for known existing biases, etc. Or if you're equipped to do so, you can do you own statistical analysis on the numbers your given and see if they make sense. But realistically, how many people are going to expend all that effort?
Why should Facebook be responsible? Do we really need to "protect" people by preventing them from reading tabloid magazines?
That was one thing the PHP community got right with the upgrade to PHP7: they made sure the major frameworks and libraries worked well from the start - and worked "better" in the new version (in this case they got a free performance boost).
It is different: Cellphone, especially smartphone nowadays, has extended reach.

When your phone is taken away after they forced you enter SU level password, you have no control of it, they do.

Whoever took it inside the room, they can:

>Browser your email, check who you contacted since you have you email box: Why you bought this on amazon? Why you bought that from Ebay? For what reason you purchase two pressure cookers from and nails from Walmart at the same time?

>Check your contacts: Who is Mr.X? When was the last time you talk to Mr. Y? What was in the conversation?

>Check what you have posted on facebook/Twitter. You supported Aaron Swartz? You are in the protest called The Day we Fight Back? What was the protest about? Who you are with?

>You may have home security Cam APP installed: Who sitting in the sofa? How many rooms do you have? Is this your wife? What is her social security number? What is her first name? On the day of Feb 21, 2013, who are the two male visited your home? What's their name and what's the purpose of the visit? How long they stayed in your house? What car they are diving? What is the plate number?

>Copy all your photos for further investation.

>Install Spyware, Copy your RSA key stored in your phone.
Show me a piece of software by "Software manufacturers" without a bug and I'll show you a piece of software with not enough users.

Aka: https://www.google.com/search?q=linux+uptime+bug
But without semver you'd need to do this manual work even more often! Semver makes you do less manual labor, because you know that PATCH and MINOR don't require your attention. You don't know such a thing in many other versioning schemes.

Would it be better to eliminate even more manual labor? Yes, of course. But then is semver bad because it reduces manual labor?
What is the truck factor of GitHub projects?
The UK, at a red brick (that's the British Ivy League).

The basic cost of living (rent/council tax/water bills/food prices) has been gradually inflating while the cost of labour increased at a far more modest rate. This has been true for a long time. I think because it is a creeping thing it is harder to spot when the new normal began.

Anecdotal but several degree holders I knew in college (mostly accountants!) continue with prostitution afterwards as well because it is otherwise difficult to make ends meet.

The explanation I'm partial to is that the price of energy has stalled progress for most people in western society. When you look back to 1973 it is really quite dramatic but we are now used to high prices and the various accommodations made as side affects.

I know most people my age see 2008 as a break point, but the rot has been going on for much longer than that.
The article is saying Makerbot's market (consumer 3D printing) has stagnated, not enterprise.
Point of view from Europe: doesn't matter that Coffee sue wasn't about millions just thousands, the main issue is that she won. That is what we laugh about. You can act as brainless and won money. If you order hot coffee you can pay your own bill when you spill it on you. So thanks to her and only her Gourleys got limited money.
And you can only do that if your last 5 years of taxes are properly filed.
Je joue à Metal Slug X
I agree though. The Django (and Python) community in my experience has been good at actually debating issues on their merit, and trying to keep own feelings/opinions with no facts to back them up out of it. Of course this doesn't always work and there's always going to be some comments that don't follow those principles, especially with more controversial topics.