skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> When you build a product do you really think house best can I help my customer

This might be a surprise but yes I do! I worked for a tech company which survived and did well for 20+ some years and the reason is because they thought and cared what the customer wanted and always put them first, even at the detriment of yearly revenue.

It turns out we didn't need sales people, MBAs or much marketing either, customers were marking for us.

I am bit saddened that you think this is "this is extremely naive".
It's not clear there would have been a long term to hold it for, their financials weren't exactly pretty, and given how heavily dependent they were on debt raises, a rising interest rate environment would have been tough on them...
Donald Trump 2016 President of the United States – Animated Explanation
Stereotypes of Autism
China enforces age and game time limit on MMOs (2007)
well are you going to suggest a better solution?
Captain401 (YC S15) is hiring engineers to help more businesses offer a 401(k)
This is more or less correct - authentic, local experiences have always been top of mind. It was sort of an accident that in the process we also stumbled onto "stay somewhere cheap" with a better reputation system than CouchSurfer, et al.

Another way of thinking about this is to understand that Airbnb doesn't think of itself as an accommodations company, and hasn't for years. It thinks of itself as a travel company, and this has significant implications for its overall strategy.
With BeeCanvas, Collect and share your ideas visually
It sure is a problem but this showing right after the election with Facebook, Google and all these media outlets started talking about "Fake News" all of the sudden is a not a coincidence, there is an implication there and my point is that is largely made up and somewhat dishonest.
Generalised egg drop problem
And that affects the outcome of an election, how?

Sure, it's a bias that you ought to measure and factor in into your projections and your campaigning, but to say that the fake news item swung the vote in one or either direction is to completely miss the point.
Drupal Core – Moderately Critical – Multiple Vulnerabilities – SA-CORE-2016-005
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12984668
last.fm brought me to MusicBrainz. In 2007. ;)
> why do you use the maximize / minimize buttons?

To maximize and minimize windows?

> If you're just trying to see a different app, wouldn't alt+tab do the same thing?

Can you alt+tab with a mouse?

> why do you need to see a running list of everything that's open in your face at all times?

A taskbar at the edge of the screen is "in your face"? What if the panel auto-hides?

> it seems to me like the only time you should need this information is when you're switching apps.

And by hiding that information, you add an extra step to the process. The one-step "click on taskbar button" becomes the two-step "activate the window list, click on window button".

> i3 doesn't show you all of the running applications at once either, but no one ever complains about that.

That's because people who use i3 don't want that feature. People who do don't use it.

GNOME used to have it, but threw it away--along with many other features.

Why is it so hard to understand that not everyone uses their computer the same way you do?
It's not a new app - this is built into the existing Airbnb app. It'll also be available on web.
are you spamming us?
That "shakeup" was a vote to regress things to how they were in the past. It was a vote to rollback changes, not go in a new direction. It was a fundamental part of the campaign slogan: "again".

I'm not sure if you noticed, but both houses went Republican, and the Republicans who have been controlling congress for the past 6 years have been stonewalling and blocking everything. The people who were voted in? They actually aren't up for change.

edit: The Republicans in particular are not going to change the current system, and Trump, even if he wanted to, can't do it without a 2/3rds majority for the constitutional change. The Republicans don't want to change the current system, because it's their force multiplier - they are overrepresented because they've been able to more successfully bend the current system via gerrymandering and similar. They also will have serious trouble fiddling with the constitution, because in order to get where they are, they've made a lot of shouty people very religiose about the original document - changing their 'holy bible of politics' will be a very difficult sell.

Trump will change the rhetoric coming out of the oval office, sure, but he's not going to substantially change how government functions.
Kruhft – '// my kingdom for a macro' – ambient industrial music – (2016)
Jackson Release 2.8.5
That would be an interesting compiler project.
But look at Europe. Europe thought it could ignore Africa and the Middle East but guess what, when there's a large difference things tend to find a way of equalizing themselves.

So my rational argument, I hope, is that one can't leave international disparity for long durations any more than they can leave internal disparity (or instead of it). It will catch up with you. This is a small planet. So when someone asks what's in it for me I think we have some answers for them. And we should also do better for them regardless. North Korea pursues an isolationist pose, how well is that working for the people there? How many American jobs are created because the companies they work for can trade globally? If anything the US is a prime example of how you can prosper while being more open.

EDIT: + cheaper goods do help everyone. As to high house prices that's a different story, don't blame globalism for that one.
The overall stewards and interests behind Kubernetes have a greater interest in making it simple to use and administer.

It isn't quite there yet but things are improving on that front all the time and will be significantly better for newbies in a few more versions. In other words, it is getting there, don't worry about it.
I'd like more non webapp/CRUD people. Biotech, hardware, energy...whatever you can muster really :)
Did you have a any experience?
Did you have a any experience http://expresspharmacyrxt.com/index.php/shop-store/smart-drugs/armodafinil-150-detail/?
Yes, legitimate news outlets do this with actual reporting to back it up.
I'm totally done with Wikileaks. Just look at their Twitter feed for five minutes and it's not hard to see that they've been heavily biased against one side of the political spectrum in the United States. Not only this, their tweets have at times been erratic, peddling things ranging from outrageous conspiracy theories:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794450623404113920?lang...

to anti-semitism:

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2016/07/25/what_wikil...

I'm all for anti-secrecy organizations that hold powerful figures accountable, but Wikileaks appears to have lost their way. My own little conspiracy theory is that they've been coerced somehow into doing the bidding of the Russian government.
Good to hear.

BTW, it turns out there's a registry of volunteer drone pilots for doing SAR (search-and-rescue) called SWARM, whose website is this:

http://sardrones.org/

I don't know how helpful this would be for the current situation, given that the California pilots seem not to be at all close by (at least the cities I recognize), though perhaps the list is worth a look:

http://sardrones.org/search-and-rescue-drones/sar-drones-wor...

(There's also a guide for volunteer pilots on procedures that might be helpful:

http://sardrones.org/swarm-standard-operating-procedure-sop/ )
"None of that is illegal but it doesn't mean it deserves a free open forum."

Why not? If we silence them on few webpages, you think they simply will disappear? Trump as a president should be the wakeup call for everyone that forced, artificial politeness and political correctness won't make problems disappear.
Why You Can’t Search for a Job from a Remote Location
Ironically, Metallica's new album is out tomorrow. (not pointing fingers or anything, just thought I'd point that out.)
I suppose there might be two problems with free news: insufficient funding and strings-attached funding. I'm not sure that free news is worse than news for a fee in these respects.

I get my news from ad-funded, donor-funded and tax-funded sources. None of these is perfect, but is news provided to readers/listeners/viewers for an access-fee better, or does it tell people what they want to hear?

It's also worth considering the respected print publications that get revenue both directly from readers and from advertising. My understanding is that they typically get more revenue from advertising, so are they really better than free news? All the ad-free news I know of is also free-of-charge.
That sounds great, but I never see clients who actually understand what they need.
and if airbnb discover that you are doing this they can see that you are violating the terms of service and stop listing your place.
I'd hardly call white nationalism fringe, it's self evidently been here a long time although in the daily discourse it's been ignored, or wished it wasn't as overt as it is. Well, this election showed otherwise.

But that is not the only factor. There are probably a dozen stewing issues and Trump managed to ride the coat tails of quite a few of them, not least of which is some people who didn't want Trump president couldn't be bothered to show up and vote. There's a roughly 8 million voter gap between 2012 and 2016.
> Did you even read the article?

Yes I did. Did you read my comment? There is a reason we are all of the sudden talking about Fake News and just a few days almost nobody thought about the phrase. It has little to do with elections in India.
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-sp-500-index-is-not-you...
> Not exactly. They just like chicken feet. Cultural palate.

ish.

Depends. Also true of tripe (dim sum example, usually also black bean and/or chili). Trust the taste buds. A good restaurant shouldn't serve something that's not good. So take anything off the cart, or menu. If it doesn't taste good, the restaurant isn't doing something right.

Disclaimer: I eat anything that is cooked with love and/or care, and other stuff too.
Get to Know Amir Najam Expertise and Blogs
>Back in the USA, what percentage of Trump voters do you imagine hold passports? Sure, correlation is different from causation, but still...

About the same percentage as Hillary supporters? In my experience holding a passport is more correlated with income than any particular political leaning. What they do is likely a lot different (e.g. religious mission vs French wine binge), but there is nothing particularly Democrat/Republican about a passport.
Automated Pro-Trump Bots Overwhelmed Pro-Clinton Messages
I find the recumbent bicycle is the steadiest way to do reading and cardio at the same time.
I think this is different from other company in the sense that they dont own Kubernetes.

It is unlike, for example, Influxdata that they own InfluxDB and dont integrate clustering capability into open source edition.
Ten Key Ideas: Opening the Door to the Economic Way of Thinking
I keep wondering when major torrent trackers like this are going to start using things like zeronet.
How does this compare to VistA? (Well, one obvious example is this appears to be written in Python, whereas Vista is largely written in MUMPS; this I think uses PostgreSQL whereas VistA uses the MUMPS embedded database.)
This isn't the "wrong candidate" who has "wrong" policy views like Ted Cruz or Pat Buchanan. This is a candidate who doesn't really have the basic self-control to stop Tweeting when he knows it's hurting him. That's new. Alexander Hamilton didn't think it could happen, although we've greatly damaged the system that he and his peers created to prevent it from happening (primary elections, ballot measures, bound electors, etc). It's worth trying to figure out why, because it will only take between one and a few such commanders-in-chief for the story to get its final chapter.
Look at his paper "Understanding Brute Force".

> And 256-bit ECDHE has 128 bits of security.

Can you give that a meaningful definition? I suspect you mean that it takes ~2^128 operations to break a single target ECDHE exchange. If so, that is both true and completely irrelevant to anything I said.

The key point here is that it does not take anywhere near 2^128 operations before you can decrypt a single AES-128 block out of a large corpus of captured ciphertexts. For that type of attack, 128 bit ciphers offer vastly less security than ECDHE on a 256-bit field.
Constructive feedback: this sentence should really be worked into the first line of text: "It covers the functionality of Electronic Medical Record (EMR), Hospital Management, and Health Information System (HIS)."

As of now, one has to scroll/read for a bit before learning what the project actually does.
ISP and mobile phone company 'Three' has 6 million customer database records compromised same day as this story. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-38022309

You probably won't have to wait long.

Although it won't actually reveal search content, only that they went to Google.com (and maybe that their browser tried to preload content from the top search result domains?)
Oh, for fuck's sake, stop being so goddamned literal. Do you also tell people off for calling children "kids", because "kid means young goat"?

If you 'stop' corruption, it doesn't mean you 100% eliminate corruption. A journalist can 'stop people in the street' to talk to them, but that doesn't mean that they stand still rather that walk-and-talk. If a parent is able to 'stop' a kid sleeping badly, it doesn't mean their kid never again sleeps badly, just that the incidence is considerably reduced. Even a traffic 'stop' sign doesn't completely stop people all the time. 'Stop', when applied to human behaviour, is not the fucking same as corking a bloody wine bottle.
Stack Overflow Enterprise
I'm super surprised there isn't a big chart front and centre on that site! or.. really anywhere on that site.

Nice site though, don't get me wrong
I'd love to have a team you accepted on the podcast right after they got accepted and at various stages of the process (at the very least sometime before demo day and shortly after). Basically get a view into the expectations and what helped them most etc.
The term "biased" should be discarded, people just use it to mean "publishes things I don't agree with".
Those have been shutdown as of the end of 2015.
The point is not that they're more common. Anyone that has wanted a fast car in the last 60 years could either buy or build one. Even a regular old car is plenty enough to kill yourself and plenty of other people if you're reckless enough. Besides that, it's much easier to create a stupidly dangerous car through sheer neglect of tires/brakes than to actually buy one that way.

Your argument is comparable to banning sharp knives because someone started selling them cheaper than butter knives. Both types have always been sufficiently available and dangerous that making one more common than the other isn't going to change anything
Honestly, why would a malicious actor not do this? Automate the e-mail creation, the sign-up, hook your script up to the post forms and you've got an instant larger-than-life megaphone. Hell, I bet you could even train a RNN to make passably realistic short-length responses to people that decide to engage your posts.
One way to get upload credit was to get the users who exploited the ambient genre by automatically downloading every ambient album to download fabricated paulstretch albums.
Why not? I wonder if you could construct a polar orbit that followed the daylight around the earth. Add higher concentrations of satellites to the orbits that correspond to the higher traffic hours of the day.
True, but I've seen enough of it now that open source politics should almost be a field to major in. :)

It's never blatant, it's always calls for seemingly good things like extra pluggable points to make sure we don't favor particular solutions. Then it's making sure that any decision is brought to a huge vote by a giant committee that spends weeks arguing about if it's something they should even decide on, etc.

Ultimately there are ways to do immense damage to open source communities with small well placed "concerns" that seed doubt. Usually it's a mailing list post (or github issue) with some grand question like "Is X something Kubernetes should really be doing?" followed by bullet points outlining other unrelated issues that "we should be focusing on" and to "leave X up to other tools because the solutions are a matter of taste and therefore there is no right solution."
This story reads more like 'fake news' won the election narrative peddling more then new insight into the bot situation. There has been plenty of research on the avalanche of bots spewing tweets, comment and stories for years now that 'sway peoples opinions'. Not just political but in every other domain also.

Why is this now, after the election a big important story thats popping up all over the media.
Apache Maven Site Plugin 3.6 Released
> What do you all think about the practice of pushing changes to an open pull request based on code review feedback?

For branches / commit sets? Totally fine.

For individual commits being rewritten (e.g. because you're using perforce and not on a separate branch)? I tend to push back on anything non-trivial or that will make the diff look dirty - e.g. no running mass autoformatting passes on refactored code, even if the rest of the file desperately needs it, and it's guaranteed not to break anything. Keep that in a separate followup commit. Some minor typo fixes - sure, those are fine.

Key phrases - when accepting feedback: "Sure, but can I save that for a followup commit?" - and when giving feedback: "Looks good - can you rename/fix/tweak X in a followup commit?" I'll generally note "Still TODO" in the actual commit when I do this.

> My org has not established a consistent policy around this and often people will push changes after some reviewers have already approved the request, which I find concerning.

Policy process and tools should all generally treat modified commits as unreviewed or partially reviewed, and modified branches as partially reviewed (assuming the earlier changelists/commits were not rewritten.) The additional changes haven't been reviewed.

If your policy doesn't require reviews for e.g. minor typo fixes, whitespace fixes, etc. - then as long as e.g. all the meaty commits have been reviewed, the pull request is still reviewed enough to commit. A quick "Still look good?" "Yep +1" is all that's necessary if your policy is tighter. Sometimes people will encourage you to not even wait for that - "yeah, go ahead and just commit once you've fixed these X minor issues."

Of course, your policy on that may not be established yet either - I do like it being slightly lax here, and to some degree I see what I can get away with, and it seems to work out OK ;). A tech lead's guideline to our team was simply "if I track a bug down to a changelist and find out it wasn't reviewed I'm going to be cross", leaving it up to your personal judgement how much you wanted to annoy him ;). I'm fairly up front about what I don't bother getting reviewed - this may be enforced by requiring such changelists to be marked, or they may send out email warnings - so I can trust in my coworkers (including e.g. my tech lead) to give me feedback if they'd rather I didn't take it quite so far.

> On the other hand, it is nice to see review comments being addressed in the same branch/PR. Thoughts?

In the same branch/patchset/bundle of commits? Sure. No problem. Encouraged, even, assuming it doesn't break your workflow too much. Unless they're getting unwieldy - but that's an orthogonal issue to the specific act of pushing changes. I get irritated when people throw monster refactoring patchsets at me, even if they do them perfectly and I end up having no changes to suggest. Even worse is when it's one commit. I always give a gentle nudge/reminder to break things up and submit in chunks if at all possible when it happens.
Broadcast the net has a very strict 1 week seeding policy on every download though which makes having a dedicated seedbox almost a requirement. Having been flush with what.cdupload after stocking up years ago on big freeleech files, I kinda preferred the ratio model but can definitely see how it could be restricting for new users.
It may be hard to prove if the employ soft ways of influence, the traditional craft of intelligence agencies: extortion, bribery, forged threats from the opposing side etc.
No, I get it. For whatever controversy, there's a "the" rational argument, you know what that one rational argument is, and all these dummies aren't interested in learning what that is. Kind of evangelical if you think about it.

So on what basis are emotion and rationality being separated here? Common sense?
Dr.Web Antivirus for Android, Windows, Mac and Linux License Key
> In some cases, they are only hurting nature, in others, they are literally jeopardizing their own safety.

I find that phrasing odd. The former is much more serious than the latter. Feeding wildlife, for example, is an excellent way to ensure negative interactions with humans in the future. By disobeying posted rules, these people are putting others' lives in danger in addition to damaging the animals.
Use Fastmail for your mail, contacts, calendars. A proper company with proper support.
Ultimate PowerShell Prompt Customization and Git Setup Guide
5 Tips for Writing DSC Resources in PowerShell 5
Show HN: JSON Generator
Instagram iPa 9.6 Free Download for iPhone and iPad
I never said I have a solution I just know that the current situation is not good either.
TIL about DKIM signatures. Thanks!
Note that this is just some people who helped start the project when they were at Google, and both of them have since left. Kubernetes is managed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation, and a very large number of companies are involved in managing the project's direction with an open governance model. There are diverse enough interests already that there isn't really any risk of one company's interests driving the project off course in a way that's harmful for the larger Kubernetes community.
You are blaming red state governance for a program that dates back to at least 1966, 36 years before Georgia broke a 130 years streak of consecutive Democrat governors. The article doesn't say that the program has changed, but that poultry companies started supplying bad data. You are jumping to the conclusion that this was affected by outsourcing, tax cuts, or replacing civil servants with political appointees, none of which is stated in the article.
It is going to be owned by the people who pay to produce it. I don't really understand the argument in favor of doing it any other way.
These experiences mirror my own in an uncanny way (recently made team lead, 3-4 devs, just started code reviews) and found all of this information extremely useful. I would add that discussing how much mileage can be estimated on the current stack is important as well. Good code can still be dangerous if someone in the team knows or feels they are only going to get 3 months out of it before dependencies will change and will need to update it again. I've found discussing sustainability from time to time helps to figure out who is checking in their code just to make it to the next day and who has an eye towards creating a low maintenance product. Life pressures can cause the best devs to live one day at a time they just need the proper forum to express it to the whole team. Sometimes it just simply gets forgotten or lost in the shuffle- the fact that library or API "X" will no longer be available.
An IoT device is not going to have a satellite hookup. The things are about the size of a pizza.
Same here! No demo, no chart in docs, ...
JDK 9 and JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw b144 are available on java.net