skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The car seems to have a bad habit of turning its steering wheel at stop signs before making its turn. This isn't really a problem at stop signs, but would definitely be dangerous if turning left on a green while waiting for oncoming traffic.

The only left on green we get to see in the video is at 15s, but it didn't have to wait for any oncoming traffic. Hopefully it knows to treat those situations differently.
Help What happens when dog owner tries to work out [video]
Here is a processing program to do ASCII art that has depth info, color, and is animated - http://pastebin.com/bz1pKAKQ

The logic is pretty simple to translate to other languages. This doesn't do the boundary or structural stuff as described in the paper but is a reasonable start for someone interested. Personally I don't like that sparse looking style of ascii art.
Yes, the article states that "Apollo 11 ran her software", which I consider to be a false statement; and many other articles explicitly give her credit for designing or writing the Apollo software. I think writers make that mistake in good faith, since they don't know the timeline of development. And it's not so much that she "relied on the real key people" - she was not a major figure of the development phase of the Apollo software, and certainly did not lead it; Richard Battin and Dan Lickly led the development, and the latter handed the leadership of the software effort over to her as he left the project - but this was after the development itself was over.

I am not at all trying to minimize her accomplishments, which included being responsible for the software work, such as release, integration, and debugging during most of the actual flights. However, a lot of people, basically just because of lack of knowledge, give her credit for leading the development or writing of the software as well, which is incorrect.
Yet another reason to do away with DST
What programming language(s) do you typically use for your critical code?
Use composition. Extract the logic out of your custom element into another class (ie.: Progress). That can parent any compatible presentational custom element (i.e.: ProgressText, ProgressBar)
Moving from monoliths to Lambda functions
I think he was just clarifying a point about the notation.

Given that each f is a function, mapping each member of its domain to one member of its range, and that for each member of the range, there is a member of the domain that the given function maps to it, and that the domain and range are the same size, then there can be no member of the domain not mapped to some member of the range, and each member of the domain must be mapped to a distinct member of the range (or else there would not be enough members of the domain to cover all the members of the range), so, with the domain and range being the same set, each of the given functions is a permutation of the domain, and collectively they must be all of them.

This is a verbose version of the argument for this being the set the author says it is. Arguably, it would be easier to read if I had used x for 'member of the domain', y for 'member of the range' and f for 'the given function'.
Yes, i mean what happens more often- if sign is not fully removed, but bent by collision or turned sideways by hooligans or something. Human would recognize that. Car will not.
As a mathematician, I understood Lamport's notation, but that doesn't mean it's good notation.

For that audience, why do you even need it? Just say "the set of all permutations of N elements" or "the symmetric group S_N" if you're nasty.
We should rephrase the question as "why don't computer scientists learn traditional math symbols?"

Try writing traditional equations with your keyboard. Try posting your answer online. Modern computer science breaks down these symbols into plain english.
I did math in the wrong order. I first was "exposed to it" as an engineer undergrad - didn't care at all (just wanted to code) and barely passed eng. math.

After working for two years, went back and did undergrad physics courses (including math for phys) and started to "get it".

Then went on to a PhD in general relativity - which is a LOT of math. I went back to software and most of it leaked away.

I am now trying to get it back (20 years later) - as I resurrect a Maple package for GR, grtensor, which I co-wrote as part of my PhD. Curved space is a beautiful thing.

Penrose's recent book reminded me of his wonderful "The Road to Reality: - which is a great tour of math leading into physics.
This is hilarious to me. I have always found notation used outside of math hideous.

Compare any math notation to the notation used in operational semantics or proving things about type environments.

Compare any math notation to the logic notation used in philosophy.

Hideous, all hideous, I say!
Ha. The equivalent of "why" on matlab, I guess.
> IMO these are the true reasons perl lost its popularity while ruby and python remain lively

As a perl cum python developer, no. It's that I had to spend time reverse engineering the code I wrote last week, because of the hundreds of obscure symbols I cleverly used to reduce thirty lines of clear code to five lines of compact code.

Python and Ruby both have to deal with references (though much more indirectly via the concept of mutable objects), as well as arguments coming in as parameter lists (and dicts).
And before that, Ponyo was supposed to be his last film. He retires on a regular basis.
TLDR: mice exposed to very high levels of stimulation early in life, grew up to treat that level of stimulation as baseline later in life. Study posits that brains wired like that would deal well with high stimulation environments that would overwhelm regular subjects - but be under stimulated and restless in "regular" situations.

Very interesting finding for sure - especially since the mice weren't even playing games etc. They were just exposed to high levels of audiovisual stimuli. Makes you wonder if actually interacting and problem solving, instead of just being bombarded with stimuli, would have a different effect...
when did snopes turn into some kind of political fact-checking website ? Isn't snopes literally two guys running this site from their bedroom? Not biased at all.

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/28/snopes-caught-lying-about-...
Nice try but humans aren't mice
I did not invested the time to search for that version and I doubt it exists.
> Oh, to be sure! All gay men are narcissistic to some degree, and Milo I think more than most.

That's quite a bold statement. Can you elaborate more on this or provide some evidence (honest question, I'm not trying to get into an argument)?
Tons of legacy code. I'm in academia and in some research areas Matlab is so deeply entrenched that it will take decades for Python or Julia to replace it. Not sure though whether all this code runs under Octave.
> As a sarcastic quip, what's so complicated about saying f[x]=y?

IMO that line was the worst offender by far. Just use f(x), especially when you're giving an oral presentation to people who aren't familiar with the context in which the brackets are standards (TLA). Just because your formal system uses brackets for function application don't mean you need to obfuscate your slides.
Bad news can be a lot of things just like fake news. Generally stuff like character assignations pieces, extremely partisan stories that have an agenda could be considered bad news.

So basically most of the news at this point is bad news. And thats why all the polls show that only around twenty percent of the people still trust the mainstream media.

Its corporate mainstream media that is part of the problem and some of the worst offenders. I see this as another attempt at blame shifting and an attempt to paint alternative media as a whole with a 'fake news' stigma.
DeepLearningKit: Open source framework for Apple platforms using Swift
Software foundations: https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/sf/current/index.html

VST: http://vst.cs.princeton.edu/

Dafny: http://rise4fun.com/Dafny/tutorial

You are probably not going to get to the point of being able to tell your coworkers "yes, this is formally verified" unless you are working in a specific domain where you have few/no libraries and very clearly stated and well trusted assumptions about the external environment (hardware, etc).
Thanks for asking. For me, the issue is not the quality of clients and work. I tend to keep my prices high which seems to filter many junk jobs. I'm also lucky in a sense that many jobs find me and not the other way around. I suppose what burns me out is the instability in income. I try to mix it up as much as possible with fixed cost and hourly jobs but most good thing eventually come to an end. Some days I'm lucky and good projects find me and we come to a mutual agreement quickly but occasionally I have a time gap in my daily schedule that needs to be filled. I'm not a developer or I'd work on a side project to fill my time. I typically spend any extra time on making a new, more thorough portfolio but then I'm reminded that the clock isn't running and I can't bill myself. Is anyone in the same shoes or have some advice?
Good article though I would disagree about AWS Reserved Instances. Though they are way more complicated, they can give 40%+ discount and in many use cases you can run quite a lot of them.
Ditto, plus, what doesn't 'rewire your brain for better and worse'?
You didn't ask me, but I use the same tools in my work. If a scientist tells you they're using "Python," there's a good chance they're referring to this stack, possibly without knowing what's under the hood.

I'm a scientist working at a private company that makes measurement equipment, and I use Python for practically everything now: Modeling, data analysis, and even talking to hardware. Our engineers have been kind enough to provide Python friendly interfaces to our hardware, so I can write things like test scripts that are used in product development and sometimes in manufacturing. I write similar scripts when I'm prototyping hardware myself.

I write some stand-alone Python programs, when it becomes convenient to provide a GUI (via Tkinter). I also use Jupyter quite a lot for data analysis and exploratory work. Often, I use a stand-alone Python program to generate data, and a Jupyter notebook (with inline Matplotlib graphs) to analyze it.

At another level of abstraction, I now use Jupyter as my lab notebook. Just last week, I completed a fairly extensive study that included development of a prototype, automated testing, and data analysis. When I was satisfied with my results, rather than writing a separate report, I simply added explanatory text to the Jupyter notebook, with some cell phone pictures for documentation. And then I scheduled a meeting to present my results. My presentation was a slideshow that was served up from the same Jupyter notebook using the nbconvert utility.

Even though my work will never be revealed to the public, I have embraced the idea that "real science is open and reproducible," and am pushing towards an ideal state where a single file folder contains everything needed to reproduce my work, including hardware design, source code, experimental data, and so forth. I'm also learning to use git, so that this stuff can all be revision controlled.

If someone asks me for help getting started with Python, I suggest that they should get Anaconda, or an alternative that I prefer called WinPython.
The Fictional Brand Is Dying and Advertising Needs to Let It
Decrease data use on windows phone
What has to kill the alt-right is sunlight: drag their ideas into public and point out how those are wrong. With a boot, if necessary.

So for instance, no, race is not a biologically meaningful signifier.
All of the kids playing it went back to school and moved onto other games.
Is there any way of downloading all the pictures without having to resort to using scrapers? Took a quick look and couldn't find anything
What's so hard about Greek letters? There's only 24 of them.
The equipment is available in the current S-Class and the most current E-Class, when we talk about the sensors and the actuators. It is different with actual ECU who does the computing stuff.

BTW I doubt that the Tesla is ASIL D complient in this sense. AFAIK their is no ASIL D implemented component right now. Everybody avoids that. But this is required to be fail safe.
Good point. If you switch jobs, chances are good you will be paid more in your new position and your replacement will be paid more than you were.
Hanging from a bar, is actually the start of your path to doing a pullup. Next you jump up, and slowly lower yourself, over and over. Pretty soon you will be doing your first real pull-up.
Note that #14 is simply a version of this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words Besides being cute in making it #14, I suspect he felt it needs to be explicitly stated since its inverse is an explicit goal of our enemies. Although Vox Day himself isn't "white", and I'll note as a matter of taxonomy divides the Alt Right into the Alt West and Alt White, the latter a very small subset.

The general answer to the apparent contradiction is generally found in the other points and implied in #15: complete separation, e.g. #11 "The Alt Right understands that diversity + proximity = war." No proximity, no war of that sort e.g. embedded in those laws you refer to, and therefore no problems with #14 of those sorts.

Also, I should make clear this is Vox Day's first cut of a statement of what the Alt Right is, but he thinks it's solid enough to get it translated into quite a few languages now. But the Alt Right is still seriously inchoate.
I don't see how this could possibly work even a little bit without Javascript. What would you fall back to? A static hunk of HTML? That could only work in the very specific case of a custom control that happens to have exactly the same utility on the page as an existing HTML element. And even then, you'd need to add a templating language, so you could express how to render that HTML chunk with a certain value or text. This templating language would not be Javascript, since you're trying to avoid that. So we add a new templating language to HTML for the benefit of rendering content for people who turn off Javascript?
What part of React "state management" do you find indispensable?
But why he decided to use f[x] instead of just the very common f x?
> and often the lives of the innocent who trusted them as well.

This is the most crucial part. Maybe you, personally, are OK with modifying your plane and you accept the possibility that your tinkering may cause the plane to crash. But unless you're flying in the middle of Siberia, there are others.

The people in the house you may crash in, the people in the other plane you may have just clipped in the runway, the SAR crew that may drown trying to rescue you after your corrupted GPS database diverted the plane to open ocean in stormy IFR conditions. Please everyone, think of their lives even if you're open to risk yours.
Any tips on how to do this (for those of us not educated in monitoring traffic)?

I'm writing personal home automation stuff and will be wiring up a handful of IoT SmartPlugs.

With all this IoT stuff i'm starting to wonder if buying a 2nd router to isolate the IoT, or perhaps a "really good" router with features designed for monitoring IoT.

Regardless, this is a problem i won't be able to ignore. So any advice is appreciated :)
"At the end of the story Nokia entrusted the project “to the community”, which was equivalent to abandoning it. [...] I am happy with a bleeding edge, open source, but much more limited ZTE Open phone running the Firefox OS."

History repeating. I loved Firefox OS, now Windows Mobile and I think Microsoft is not far away from releasing it "to the community". I don't want to live in a world without choice.
AI, Robotics and weird fun to break them before it’s too late
That's all very nice in theory but, in the actual real world, if you do a lot of unpredictable braking or other unexpected behaviors, you will basically get hit all the time even if those accidents aren't technically your fault.
Hint, try to interact with them
Custom Elements don't specify how they render at all - they're only about creating instance of specific HTMLElement subclasses during browser operations like parsing, document.creatElement(), cloneNode(), etc., and firing "reactions" like connectedCallback() and attributeChangedCallback(). Once created, Custom Elements can really do anything to the document, there's not built-in concept of templating.

Generally though, Custom Elements are going to create a shadow root and render some DOM into it. It's all just code, so an element subclass can use a template library, and can do things like you want, like decouple its template from its implementation.

Here's a sketch of an element that would use a template as determined by a 'template' attribute.

class MyElement extends HTMLElement {
constructor() {
super();
this.attachShadow({mode: 'open'});
}

render() {
this.template.render(this.shadowRoot);
}

attributeChangedCallback(name, oldValue, newValue) {
if (name === 'template') {
this.template = templateLib.lookup(newValue);
this.render();
}
}
}

And you'd use it like this:

<my-element template="progress-bar"><my-element>
Lagrange CDN
Getting tired of the "rewired brain" metaphor.
Actually, you can buy the car too. I have been driven in a S-class about 3 years ago that had the same capabilties the Tesla here has.
> Compare any math notation to the logic notation used in philosophy.

Aren't they the same? I assume that by "logic notation used in philosophy" you mean the kind that's used by Carnap, Kripke, etc.
I find the map solution simpler than the for loop as there is no loop variable.
I know, it's frustrating as hell. But if we're to build a better future for all of us on both sides of the political abyss, it has to start with someone reaching out. We have to be the ones to do that now. No one else seems to want to. And nothing is more important to our future as a country. It feels right now like division and divisiveness are everywhere. It is incumbent upon us not to exacerbate those problems, but do everything in our power to reduce them. And our power to do that is now greater than it was. This is the role which events have given us the opportunity to play. History will judge our actions in that light.

Don't let the bastards grind you down.
Manhattan DA Wants Apple to Remove iPhone Encryption
As someone currently majoring in mathamatics, I can honestly say this is the first time I have seen ":" used in this way. The "standard" way I would expect to see that would be for the first ":" to be replaced with a "|", and the second one to be replaced with a "," (or omitted entirely). The third ":" does not look out of place, although I would probably omit it, or right it as "st".

EDIT: for clarity, I would right the set as:

"{f : [1..N ⟶ 1..N] | ∀ y ∈ 1..N , ∃ x ∈ 1..N st f[x]=y}"

The ":" in this case indicates that f has the indicated type.

As long as I am commenting on my sense of "standard" notation, I should also note that the "[1..N ⟶ 1..N]" notation also seems weird (as in, I have never seen it before). I would expect it to be written as [1..N] ⟶ [1..N]. Perhaps replacing [1..N] with Z_n for the appropriate audience; however the speaker seems to be aware that this is a strange notation, as he commented about it in the beginning.

In this particular case, I would probably also omit the entire predicate in favor of writing "onto" above "⟶", which I can do because the particular property being described is common enough to have a name; however this would defeat the point of showing the notion. Once I have entirely omitted the predicate like this, I would probably omit naming f entirely, giving the notation {[1..N] ⟶ [1..N]} (again, with "onto" written above the arrow).

Actually, depending on audience, in this particular case I would replace the entire set with either "The symmetric group of order n", "The symmetric group S_n", or just "S_n".

The f[x] notation looks a bit weird out of context, but does come up when the distinction between a function and a function application is important (often times f(x) is used as a convention to remind the reader that f is a function)
TLDR; Click-baity post with an embedded click-baity Infographic. This one => https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/1*BDJfg5ExzCcmIOOYf6...
Driver Easy Pro 5.1.4 License Key Incl Crack Download
the 10th bookmarked palette, and not the worst.
The article says "without relying on a JS framework.", which is different than not requiring JS. It does not work when Javascript is disabled.
Yeah, well that steep learning curve everyone is complaining about for blender is about an hour. After that, you'll probably be doing rigged animation.

In my opinion, people associate cost with value. Something that's free MUST be worse than something that costs thousands of dollars.
Trump and Hillary were not the only candidates on the ballot.
there's a lot of genetic variation in HIV due to natural selection. in the process of replicating they make many different strains -- mostly very similar to one another.

here is an HIV sequence database https://www.hiv.lanl.gov/content/index https://hivdb.stanford.edu/page/who-resistance-list/

if you take medicine, get off them and try to get back on your medicine, you may find your medicine no longer works.

that being said I don't quite know what "neutralize" means in this context, but the NIH seems to feel this result has wide applicability.
The issue is really about capitalism.

A video where a car manages to stop because a drunk falls into your lane will make the stock soar.

A video where a car hits an old lady who jumps in front of your car will make the stock crash.

There are people on either side who want this technology to succeed or fail (not self-driving, i mean electric cars)
Polymer just makes it easier to create Custom Elements. It mostly adds templating and data binding, which aren't built-in concepts in the Web Components specs. Every Polymer element is a custom elements, and they can freely mix with other custom elements.

Custom Elements and Shadow DOM being implemented native in Safari means that Polymer is just much smaller and faster on Safari.
So what in perl made it conductive to that kind of coding? I never worked with perl much but back then I got the impression perl being line-nose or whatever was more legend than reality. Perl's not a different paradigm like APL.

And by references I meant exactly that perl is not pass by reference, unlike just about any other scripting language. R is the only other popular one I can think of that's not. There's shell too but it doesn't count.
It's probably time to go back and rewatch Noam Chomsky's video "The Myth of the Liberal Media". I believe it was from 10 years or so ago. His premise is there is no liberal (or even conservative) media, just a large corporate media.
See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12993634

If this is true, it would take several years, maybe until the next elections.
Most algorithms can handle slightly turned signs. However signs that are gone could be dangerous.
This seems almost exactly like all of React. These components do have state, just like a React component. If you're talking about how the state is changed, then now you're not talking about React. You're talking about redux, flex, etc. You may very well want something like that here too, but that's not because this isn't like React, it's because it is like React.
If it's more generally accepted that single-parenthood can cause problems for children, that general knowledge in itself might make couples more cautious about having children, or be more wary of separating if things don't work out.

Emphasis on might! I'm not saying there's an easy solution; I'm not even 100% sure that I agree with the assumptions.

What I do feel is that it's not a good idea to avoid discussing things because they're uncomfortable. At least not as much as we often seem to be doing. To some extent we have to be able to discuss sensitive things if we want to evolve/develop/progress as humanity.