skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
So - if you go insane and then insane once more you sound almost normal. Seems like Glenn Beck is the Bursar from the unseen university.

Of course there is the little problem with trying to explain away his sins instead of atoning for them.

You were spearhead, the Scaremonger in Chief of Fox News that frenzied the Tea Party. Admit it and own it.
Afaik,it was later replicated.
I actually think the exact opposite. Obama's actions have clearly ended, or diminished at the least, Pax Americana. He's basically withdrawn completely from the Middle East enabling Russia to fill the vacuum. Obama's abandoned our friends in Easter Europe enabling Russia to fill the void. That's just factual.
Sounds like you need k8s! I went though a similar progression: loving docker -> hating docker -> finding k8s
I coincidentally watched the movie last night. Overall, I recommend it. As a nerd, I felt they were a little bit light on the details of what his work meant. Unfortunately, unlike with computer movies, they couldn't create a tangible mock-up ("this is Unix, I know this...", "I'm hacking a Gibson") so it felt like there was a vacuum in the room every time they stressed how important the contents of his notebooks were but said nothing about what they actually contained. There was also a little bit of preachiness around one character being an atheist and that being a kind of bad thing, so heads up.

For a good after-movie read, someone also did a more detailed write-up of his wife's life, here: http://www.imsc.res.in/~rao/ramanujan/newnow/janaki.pdf
Awesome, thanks for getting back to me; sounds good. I'll try take a look sometime this weekend.
Not talking about something sensitive is a safer route. The risk of saying something bad outweighs the off chance of a reward.
I don't understand the NY Times' focus on future technologies which have little immediate application, over fundamentals they should (IMHO) have mastered ten years ago, such as making video and graphics first-class mediums alongside text.
And what do you think happens if you force those factory jobs back into the US with tariffs and then force companies to pay workers a living wage with benefits?

The companies instead pay big companies and already highly paid engineers to build machines to automate the work. Companies will always do whatever is most efficient, they don't care if they are using humans in Bangladesh or machines in the US.
Show HN: HelpWith, a peer to peer education platform
Why We Created Unidoc with Golang
We've learned enough neuroscience to know that humans make predictable systemic errors in judgement. This is when pursuing their own preferences, not someone else's preferences.

This has real effects that harm other people. Do what you want to yourself. The problem is when you harm others due to your own ignorance or avoidable biases.

None of the big bad movements you mention were genuinely trying to make humans into better thinkers. In fact, they all relied on humans not being such great thinkers.
He received his first briefings months ago and promptly conflates them with public news reports and then lied about what he learned.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/08/trump-didnt-lea...
It's even easier than that:

brew install gource
Ooo this is really neat. Thanks for sharing!
Impossible to know to long-term damage just now...

Think other scandalous scenarios-- Theranos/FIFA/VW-- all of those firms had good, honest, hard working folks who were otherwise blameless.

Generally, it's a good idea to address a possible blemish upfront with a potential employer. Make sure your story is solid. You'll want to have superiors & colleagues who can vouch for your work and character. As time goes on, memories will fade. Switching industries may also be a smart play. Fortunately, development work is in demand across every sector imaginable.
We need single neuron level mapping for any hope of a decent Brain-Computer Interface. Or even for really understanding how the brain works, in order to simulate it or progress in biologically inspired AI.

Neural lace looks promising. But wouldn't be the first to volunteer for one :)

http://www.nature.com/nmeth/journal/v13/n10/full/nmeth.3969....

Sidenote: I feel slightly uneasy about all this stuff.

On one level it is progressing our knowledge, but both the methods of the research (animal testing) and potential implications of deep human+machine symbiosis, combined with CRISPR on animals and humans, feel instinctively bad. It won't stop at curing disease.
Actually, I find the internal mechanics of Rubik's Cube more fascinating than the mechanics of this solver.
That's because nothing is created. A function call is just putting some registers on the stack and jumping somewhere else. Stack growth etc. is typically handled implicitly by the OS (if a write on the stack pagefaults more stack memory is allocated).

Contrary to eg. an interpreter where a stack frame would usually be a real, dedicated object that is allocated when a frame is needed.
Tim O'Reilly – Media in the Age of Algorithms
How can you take yourselves seriously?

A large daily dose of craven "speaks comfortable untruths for power" mainstream media, who have been owned by the military-industrial complex for decades. The morons at CIA didn't see it coming, that Americans would question the lies of network news, or else they would have attempted to strangle this internet thing in its cradle. They've adapted somewhat, e.g. the "good work" done at Facebook this cycle or the constant fear-mongering about Russia, China, North Korea, ISIS, etc. They just couldn't get their bloodthirsty old gal over the line, though.

The conspiracy theorist in me would like to be a fly on the wall in Pence's personal security briefings. If they hear what they like from him, he'll be our President in short order. Wasn't he a big incarceration fan?
Yeah, it works reasonably well, but you have to manually set filters and keywords, which is a drag.
If voters cared about lies, they would have strongly rejected Trump. They just wanted lies that appealed to them.
I second this recommendation. I think Claire has a very strong performance as Elizabeth.
Perhaps someone should start such a site? I fear if you let that kind of discussion on HN without any curation, it will just become like every other site that allows full scale political discussion. Pretty much a fire hose.

You might be right in that there isn't a good place to discuss it, but I don't think HN is the the solution for it.
Looking at the picture, I love "Mustache: 0" haha
With essential features such as centralised login (LDAP, AD, etc) as proprietary plugins.
Anyone know if Twitter is acting on users calling for the assassination of president elect Trump? Twitter seems to be pretty aggressive at inferring violations of their policies when someone squabbles with an SJW favored party. Trump is prolific Twitter user with a lot of followers ... are they just supposed to look the other way and ignore all the public death threats?
I think bringing robust world simulation down to the level that teenagers can effectively explore and create/invent - without tangible constraints - will be important.

Bret Victor discussed his conception of this when he wrote about 'Seeing Spaces': http://s3.amazonaws.com/worrydream.com/SeeingSpaces/SeeingSp...
Gas turbines don't need to burn anything to work--any sufficiently high temperature source of heat can be used. Fusion can be the source of that heat.
It doesn't. I'm conflating two different things that make sense in my context, but that I don't have time to explain.
McConnell has opposed pretty much every reasonable element of Trump's campaign platform to "drain the swamp". On term limits, McConnell simply said, "We have term limits; they're called elections." And, was emphatic that Republican leadership would not be doing anything on that front. Interestingly, the last time term limits were a campaign promise was when Republicans swept the house back in 1994 with the "Contract with America", which included a Constitutional amendment to impose term limits on the house and senate...it turns out term limits are only attractive when you're not soundly in the majority.

So, yeah, we're looking at four years of obstructing their own candidate on anything good or reasonable that an "outsider" might want to do. While pushing aggressively forward (or backward, as the case may be) on all the same stuff they've been outraged at Obama for over the past eight years.
> For that matter, you can even use ZFS for the container FS, which has been in use in production scenarios for quite some time... performance may not be great with ZFS here but integrity will be

It's not a very good fit for a production database if "performance may not be great"?

> (not that I'm advocating for writing directly to the container FS... not at all, really).

> There is nothing about Docker and statelessness.

You just recommended against storing state in the container FS on the previous line. What kind of state are you advocating a container should keep (that is different from what is captured the docker file and any separate data volumes)?

> Storage is hard whether you are in a container or not. Process isolation does not affect this.

But abstraction does. Normally for a database, you'd have a mirrored set of ssds, lots of ram, spread over a couple of physical nodes. Maybe with a loadbalancer thrown in.

Or maybe you'd run your nodes as a vm, with iscsi or some other nas/das. I can't recall seeing reasonable advice on how to set up such a production system with docker (but I haven't looked all that hard!).

Last time i checked, I couldn't find any suggestions for high-performance, well-tested container storage?
> numerous examples of assault and discrimination

Yes there is no denying it that it happens. But its not a "rape culture" and is not as common as people make it out to be.

A rape accusation will utterly destroy someones life. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mattress_Performance_(Carry_Th...

But yes there are the terrible instances that occur: https://www.buzzfeed.com/katiejmbaker/heres-the-powerful-let...

> to the fact that if a couple wants to have a child the woman is the one who is forced to take a career hit

This is non-partisan, and is not a social justice issue, its a public policy issue. Both Clinton and Trump have plans: http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/comparing-donald-trump-hillar...

> I don't buy the retort that a woman should choose whether she wants to pursue a career in corporate law or to have a child, that consideration never enters the picture for a man.

How do you change it though? This is simply a discussion for the couple to have.

> You may consider yourself an egalitarian but you can't be blind to the wider state of things. Have you considered that you may have a similar blindspot for other types of discrimination?

I am aware of it yes. I read a lot - but it comes across as overly-sensitive and I believe sensitivities are learned not innate. And a lot of people just want to pick a fight because they are angry.

The third-wave in your face blogging feminism is the wrong approach. It feels more like a way to gain power and influence than to actually make things better. It just drives discrimination underground.
There are two kinds of stability:

1) A big strong guy, stronger than anyone else, fucks with anyone who tries to change anything

2) lots of strong people stop anyone who gets too destructive

I don't think 1 is remotely sustainable. 2 might be doable.

> In October 2013, the incarceration rate of the United States of America was the highest in the world, at 716 per 100,000 of the national population. While the United States represents about 4.4 percent of the world's population, it houses around 22 percent of the world's prisoners.[1]

> How can you take yourselves seriously?

Totally agreed.

If the US had low crime rates, great quality of life, and was seen as universally fair and just - well then 1 might work. But when it's so unjust, unfair, and unbalanced at home, while we spend billions abroad... it stops making sense.
Note that Wittgenstein thought that you could not use language to get between language and the world, and never accepted Godel's results. It's possible he never understood them, perhaps due to the cognitive dissonance.

I enjoy Wittgenstein, but I think Godel is a far more important figure.
...you mean Twitter?
Today, for the first time in my life, I own no publicly traded stocks
It's so good to see bootcamps investing in talents. I'll definitely share this!
I still get the same annoying layout with that link.
From the screenshot he himself provided [1], it looks like he was confronted about making people at YC feel unsafe, and responded by saying they "shouldn't be on the internet".

Contrarian views are one thing. Addressing the people who fund your company like a belligerent troll is another.

You're entitled to free speech, you're not entitled to a captive ear to hear it.

[1] http://i.imgur.com/ReFx2Mr.png
Wow, i feel better now. She didn't lose, Trump won. Do you belong to a generation where everyone is a winner?

The person who runs our country depends on those votes. It's really important that people are not forgotten. If Trump makes even a little progress with jobs, he'll be a two term president.
How do you determine which system of morality prevails in this particular case? Your intuition might tell you that deontology is the dominant mode here, but my intuition tells me the opposite.
Better off reading JJ Luna's How to Be Invisible plus espionage non-fiction about Cold War fieldcraft. Then just stop using electronics when you really want privacy. Also, if you do crypto, make it look like HTTPS or something normal to be lost in the crowds over WiFi proxies. Signal and Tor screams "Look at me!"

Truth is, though, you wont be participating with most people online if you have very strong INFOSEC and OPSEC. The baseline is just way too low with insecurity and surveillance everywhere.
Retraining to do what?
> the value of the stability the U.S. provides throughout the world now.

https://chomsky.info/fateful02/

> We have to understand “stability” to mean maintenance of specific forms of domination and control, and easy access to resources and profits. And the phrase “fundamentalist religious zealotry,” as noted, is a code word for a particular form of “radical nationalism” that threatens “stability.”
Crap, I had an axe to grind, and didn't read your comment properly. Sorry.
As a big fan of the Zelda series and a graphics geek, this was a very interesting read!
Yes it is. The C++ ABI defines how any permitted inheritance hierarchy is mapped into a surjective, ordered set of vtables. Also, calls into methods of other classes in the hierarchy offset the this pointer accordingly.

It feels counterintuitive that these two mechanisms are sufficient; but they are.
FACT CHECK: Donald Trump's First 100 Days Action Plan
Interesting that you use hterm to power this. Does that mean you start a WebView. Or do you somehow have a virtual dom of sorts that renders to Obj-c view (a la react-native)?
I don't mean to be rude, but you are not coming off as a reasonable, empathetic commenter.
Requiring insurance companies to cover pre-existing conditions...

I always believed that once you accept this as a required outcome, you initiate a dependency chain that ends in single-payer government health care. There's just no way around it.
Question for those down voting him. Are you down voting because you don't think voting suppression was been going on for the last few years, or because you don't think it made a difference in this election and so it is not relevant to this thread?
Twitter has been extremely heavy on censorship this year. Dozens of high-profile users banned, hundreds 'shadow-banned', and unbelievable levels of hashtag manipulation. Twitter is not in favor of free speech, on top of being a terrible business.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12934247
Did Clinton really incite racial divide? Throwing Muslims and Latinos under the bus?

While I give credit that Trump may indeed be well intentioned but the main difference between him and Clinton is that Trump does not understand his words have consequences. Clinton knew to attack Trump the persona and not attack an ethnic group.
Best find a Target you can walk to without being on camera.
I can assure you that Trump and his supporters are not the racist, xenophobes that the media has told you.

Journey over to https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/. We have great people. You will not find xenophobia or racism there.
We elected republicans, so they give no shits about living wages.

If we made my t-shirts here, they'd cost $6 instead of $4.50, but the line workers would be making and spending money here instead of collecting disability and doing nothing. Supporting businesses doing equipment sales and repair would reappear. Wholesalers would open warehouses, etc.

The losers would be the middlemen brokering the skimming. I remember buying a pair of shoes in the 90s from a company that closed its factory in Maine. The next year the same shoe, made in some guangdong factory cost 20% more. I'd rather make a living for my neighbor than a fortune for some middleman.
Computer+Keyboard+Shortcut+Keys
Here's the big problem: You're not wrong in that automation is mostly good. But most people who are cheering for automation, or even for overseas cost savings, are not interested in what happens next to those who lose their jobs because of it. And we need to come up with a variety of solutions for that, because there are many different types of people who are losing these jobs. People who are younger are more likely able to be retrained to do something else, but someone who is 50 and nearing retirement is going to need a different approach. Not only will it be harder for them to be retrained, it will be much harder for them to get a job after that retraining.
Frankly, I think it's more likely that Trump will want to require people assimilate and become Americans then get a temporary visa.
Yea I've noticed that as well. There are also minor issues with file needing to be used for it to work requiring developers to use their entire app every deploy.

I was going to start developing my future projects (opensource and private) with this idea in mind so I don't have to worry about trying to make it work.
Interesting. You sold me on picking up a copy of BOTNS just now. Looking forward to reading it. Sounds like a fascinating story, regardless of any connection to contemporary political events one way or the other.
given the effort and energy needed go run a multi year campaign, i highly doubt it. look at his videos of him talking about the possibility of running decades ago. he has always had the passion hidden for many years.
That's why we have Constitution so that even allegedly neo-authoritarian presidents must follow its letter, if only the overreaching intelligence agencies respected it too. But no, they have their own secret interpretations of laws, secret courts, secret policies, and so on.
You take the AR tour, and then go and see the property.

It's like looking at the specs sheet of a car, before going for a test drive.
Essential in non-personal setups where paying just reasonable to me.
Agree. Well in this case we know which ones they picked.

So what do think she should have done better? Did she not lie convincingly enough, and Trump was a better liar?
> Especially considering the U.S. as de facto self-appointed global police, is doing a terrible job of looking after it's own citizens with regard to education, healthcare, the war on drugs, shooting black men, mass shootings, etc etc etc.

Those things aren't really related, except as far as american attitudes go.

For example, a massive amount of money is spent on health care.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12934247
Not the best message to young people: that puts people on either "the good, progressive side" or the "bad, conservative side". This is what creates the divisive, no-compromise society we see today. In addition, for some folks, it will seem like someone is telling them how to think.

The world is often more mixed than you'd think. For example, it's not like Trump supporters all absolutely reject progressive ideals. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-voters-climate-cha...
Happy Newsblur subscriber here. I've never missed anything in a feed (other than the HTTP/HTTPS errors that my browser gives me)
Another signal that can't be caught is SIGSTOP
While globalism just took a big slap in the face, i dont think it's even reversible [it's too big to fail]. Trump may soften some edges, shake it up a bit, but I don't expect fundamental changes. Remember that populist leaders generally don't hold on to positions.
Gary Sinise for seretary of Veterans Affairs.
I'd be interested to know if it was the same people speaking on both occasions though, because it is entirely possible that different sentiments being expressed was a result of different people expressing sentiment, rather than the same people changing their sentiment.

In other words, the same people who disliked TPP before could dislike it today, but not be commenting in the threads talking about Trump's opposition to it and new people who didn't comment on it before could be expressing their opinion formed by recent events (or even harbored from before).

I definitely think an in depth study on internet group think would be interesting, I just think that examining closer to see who composes the group and how it's thinking is an important aspect of that study.
Depends on your threat model, really.
shameless plug: have a look at https://claudiajs.com - I wrote lots of tutorials and example projects for common use cases of API GW+Lambda
This was on the front page but now not on the first six pages. Was it flagged off?
The article seem to be referring to the problem of manipulating a physical Rubik's cube. In that case, the bottleneck is the mechanical interaction, not the computation of the necessary steps, right? The real achievement here is the speed of robotic manipulation?

It's kind of misleading to phrase it as the chip solving it, when the focus is on the actuators.
Her losing the Rust Belt to Trump will probably be seen as one of the biggest election campaign blunders.

I don't see making the case for her "experience" and "qualification" anymore. With all the resources, media, donations, etc she should have had this election in the pocket.
I wish I could tell you that it won't affect you, but it will. At several companies I worked for I, as a hiring manager, wouldn't even get to see your resume or application if the suspect company was a recent (< 5 years) employer, you'd be filtered out by software, recruiting and H/R.

If there's an active criminal investigation involving the company, you'll be suspect, fairly or not.

If you're looking to leave, I'd recommend finding direct connections in candidate companies who could "sponsor" you through their H/R filtering systems, just so you get a chance to get an interview without the bias of whatever's going on at your current company.
Which users were banned for expression of opinions? I initially wrote "high profile", following your comment, but I don't actually care. High profile or not, that would make me worry.

I know Milo was banned based on the accusations that he'd orchestrated harassment of Leslie Jones, but I haven't heard of anyone being banned simply for expressing a political position.

As far as hashtag manipulation goes, I'm not sure what you mean. If you just mean they don't put some hashtags on trending, that may or may not be a bad approach to promoting healthy debate, but it's not a free speech issue.
We have gevent, tornado, twisted, pyuv.
I helped design a large scale JS execution engine. We used Babel to rewrite code with loops that could be interrupted by our system. Eg. `for(...){mycode();}` would be recompiled to `for(...){if(!running()){halt();}mycode();}`. The technical reason is that tight loops wouldn't respond to SIGINT, if I recall correctly. So while it doesn't stop infinite loops, it can control the program. I wasn't involved in productionizing it.