skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I am on mobile, however I will amend with sources. The NYT dileberately held back stories and pushed forward the views if the Clinton campaign. If you accept that wikileaks emails are authentic, you can not accept NYT as legit. Maybe we can assume it was incompetence that their polling numbers (85-15) we wrong, and that is subjective admittedly. I personally feel this too was intentional.

Edit: not to mention, like most media, it cant serve over https because of advertising refferers.

How Their Polling Numbers Changed:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/796209661456347136

How the HRC campaign used media to influence RNC and promote weakest candidates:

https://twitter.com/wikileaks

Op Ed on why Wikileaks isn't whistleblowing:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/05/opinion/what-were-missing-...

here are some screencaps of various media companies front page and politics pages:

http://imgur.com/a/v2huv

I have to find the actual links to the wikileaks NYT stoiry placement emails, but this at least points out the narrative that was being crafted and why I dislike NYT. The fact that they were part of the reason we had Trump v. Cointon is enough for me to drp them. Trump & clinton are terrible people and the media (namely NYT) is the reason this was even possible.
He quotes from the email. Was this not true?

If you do not agree with this statement then please reply to this email with your resignation because you have no place here.
How much of this is backed up by evidence? (Being a little facetious, I suspect very little.)

EDIT: Not to mention; the logic behind possession of CP being illegal is completely defeated by this enforcement strategy. (That's not to say I'll actually defend possession of CP, but I think it's very troubling that law enforcement and the judiciary are this out of sync.)
>one of the most respected news sources

Trump only has 20% chance of winning.

Dow is going to tank a million points on Trump victory.
I am 50+ and this whole safe space movement is really perplexing. No, people should not be subjected to hurtful circumstances, but at the same time, they are a fact of life.

Being a world citizen is a dicey proposition, and my gut reaction is that further insulating ourselves is the wrong way to go. I can't imagine how a military comprised of soldiers who have grown up in this movement can be expected to deal with the events of war.

If a person is truly emotionally wounded and sensitive to common messages from typical life events, they should be afforded therapy so they can cope.
do you understand what a game is? you seem to be dismissing all of these nintendo games based on surface details unrelated to the game itself.

"wii sports is just Miis put into sports settings" what is bad about this? the game itself is very enjoyable and was a worldwide sensation. what was wii sports supposed to be? not every game needs to be an open world adventure starring a bald man who's wife and child were brutally murdered.
At this point, every good Grubhub employee should be looking at outside opportunities - hard to continue working there with such a loose cannon CEO.
400% and 700% are a vast difference.

I'm not comparing Roof Top solar to Coal or Natural Gas yes very clear winner there. I'm comparing it to Hydro-Electric, Nuclear, Tidal, and Wind where it is by far the dirtiest.
Russia’s Major Banks Targeted in IoT-Powered DDoS Attacks
Yeah, this shit happens all the time. How do you people think law enforcement operates against criminal networks? Infiltrate, quietly gather evidence, then prosecute. The "gather evidence" portion often involves allowing people to do incriminating things, especially since, you know, being about to do an illegal thing isn't illegal (usually).
"If you do not agree with this statement then please reply to this email with your resignation because you have no place here"

This is elitist and exactly why we are here today. The country right now needs all of us to be at our best and show inclusiveness.
So sell or rent out one of the houses. Having a large non-income generating asset that you don't make full use of is a luxury the non-rich can't afford.
This is ridiculous. How does one go about deriving something like this? Really impressive.
Because, apparently it is not hate or malice when the left do it.
Show HN: Twitter bot for posting stuff from hackernews,xkcd etc.
There seems to be some evidence to support your assumption. I saw something somewhere that claimed that the frequency of rape has actually fallen over the last 15 years and noted that that correlated with the expanding availability of Internet porn.

That's weak evidence, but at least it doesn't contradict the hypothesis.

Someone should try giving some pedophiles access to a generous supply of computer-generated CP and seeing what happens.
Iterlib, Zero Copy Iteration on Rocksdb
Update, here is a link to the original memo. It does in fact contain this phrase.

http://media.grubhub.com/media/press-releases/press-release-...
By deduplication, do you mean that you want articles on the same subject to be filtered out or do you just want the same article not to be displayed multiple times?
Read the full email (second half of the linked page): http://media.grubhub.com/media/press-releases/press-release-...
Reasonable people can read between the lines.
If the New York Times is not an acceptable source of news then I'm the President-elect.
I read this in my feed and was ... surprised.

There is plenty to disagree with, but it's warning is clear - every site, even with clear free speech and discussion guidelines can devolve and fail to listen to others side

It's written in a clear and cogent form and would be an excellent HN level comment - free speech at some of its best.

tl;dr for a long time the conservative right has held sway and blocked through various means the rights of ideas they did not approve of. Over the past twenty years (Clintonism) has upended that and guess what, the left managed to block the speech of ideas it did not approve. Now the conservative right has gathered enough strength to push back and say "listen to us and don't demean us".

Shoe on other foot as it were.

Unfortunately no one wins if one side is winning.
A Quantum Leap for the Web [Mozilla]
Right, it's important that no one else would be able to know how you voted.

Perhaps the election commission would also have a paper receipt with a different unique key.

Then both your receipt and the county's receipt would be necessary to locate your vote on the blockchain. Then vote verification could be restricted to the same level of privacy as when voting takes place.
I don't have a problem with safe spaces. To me, they're like office break rooms. Sometimes you just need a minute to disengage. But, if you're spending your whole day in there, I'm going to question why you show up to work in the first place.
It depends on how "lifetime" is defined. This article makes that difficult.
If we could use the concept of space elevators and instead floated solar "panels" in the sky we could achieve two things, unimpeded surface area for installation and second a sunshield to cool things off a bit and forestall climatologically induced planetary change.
"hold different opinions from oneself" is subjectively tolerance/intolerance. This table exploits word games, because the first column is "in/tolerant to hearing the opions of", and the second is "holds opinions I believe to be exclusive to a special sub-community of society".

You cannot correctly come to a decision about the latter, without listening, which requires the former.
> What about the big fusion reactor in the Sky? Shouldn't we go all in on solar?

Perhaps we should not go "all on" anything. Solar is available now, it's getting cheaper by the day, and it's very easy to install and use. But it's intermittent, requires storage, it's not portable except at low levels, and energy density is not that great.

Fusion is obviously not available now. But when figured out, it would have all the strengths of classic nuclear energy without most of its weaknesses.

We should keep deploying solar as fast as possible, while aggressively pushing for fusion research.
Not that I'm expecting a response, but I'm curious; were you going to assert that it is impossible to be bigoted about a white male?
Back up and running smoothly. Sorry for the delay!
I believe that's what a living will is for. Should make sure you have one of those as well.
We've been taking suggestions on the GitHub Issues page. One of the biggest things folks are asking for is an OPML import.
In the same vein, I suggested discussing who we voted for the US Elections and why (I also mention SJW's bullying speakers off of campuses)- and my Ask HN was flagged (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12932905).

I figured it would be timely and on-topic as a result: "On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity." - https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

I figured it might help us see things from each other's point of view, and thus gratifying of intellectual curiousity. Perhaps I was mistaken.
Nobody is hiding from "scary ideas". They're hiding from the fact that other people flat out believe that they shouldn't exist.
Yow. And that article, with a wild guess for the figure, is 2 days old. Just did a search, and the LA Times says the official figure is now 4,362,087 and may change (http://www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essentia...)
"this statement" = "As we all try to understand what this vote means to us, I want to affirm to anyone on our team that is scared or feels personally exposed, that I and everyone else here at Grubhub will fight for your dignity and your right to make a better life for yourself and your family here in the United States."

Basically, if you don't feel like you can be part of the "everyone here at Gruhub [who] will fight for your dignity and your right to make a better life... in the United States," you don't belong. Nothing about the act of supporting Trump, per se.
This is very much in line with my thinking.

Making of child porn with real children is one of the most horrific crimes in the world. Fighting that by criminalizing other steps in the creation/consumption chain makes sense.

On the other hard, child porn in which no real children were involved is a free speech issue, and I'm on the side that favors permitting it.

There's also a third group of issues -- child porn is used as an excuse for general internet surveillance, which then is used to also benefit anti-terrorism, law enforcement, and anti-piracy. That's why copyright lobbyists refer to (concern about) child porn as being a godsend for their industry.
It's not emulation, it's cross-compilation which has existed basically forever. You don't have to target the same instruction set as the one you're compiling on.
So, if the schools and universities are turning out large numbers of people unable to cope without their "safe spaces" how long before society as a whole starts to atrophy when these precious snowflakes start taking their place in positions of authority or management?
Grubhub has lost my business today because of this.
I am no trump supporter, but their coverage was borderline dangerous. In the best case, wildly incompetent. Worst: bought & paid for propaganda.

Hint: the receipts are in podesta & abedin's seized emails
That's true only of the most popular OSS projects but the infrastructure described in the OP is much more general about that. I strongly recommend actually reading the full paper, it talks about the difficulty in funding these projects because of it's highly distributed nature.
I agree that the NYTimes should no longer be viewed as a neutral source; that doesn't mean that articles cannot be taken for what they are, often intellectual interesting and well-researched.

Refusing to read articles from left or right leaning sources on principle is ironically the point of this article.
When the Left is in charge, they become bullies: Intolerant of any opposing viewpoint.

This is part of the reason behind the election result.
2FA with a hardware token (U2F, Universal Second Factor) is the safest method. It has built in phishing protection, and sites can't track the token (no unique ID). It's really nice and I use it a lot but carrying around a token on your key ring makes it a hard sell for the general public.
Yeah, I was a bit shocked to see Python, PHP, and Ruby not on the list. At first I noticed PHP was missing and I thought... oh no, another PHP hater... then I noticed Ruby is too. I look forward to seeing the update.
Brain scan better than polygraph in spotting lies
> those are the ones that any sane person would be against

That's the kind of elitism that put Trump into power.

That aside, I'm glad to see that some leftists are starting to come around to the idea that through trying to fight bigotry, they themselves have become the bigots. I'm not saying Donald Trump is right when it comes to issues of nationalism and immigration, but very intelligent and well meaning people exists on both sides of that debate. I'm afraid that if we don't start a dialog soon, Trump will seem like a walk in the park compared to what extremist movement will come up next.
This statement being "I want to affirm to anyone on our team that is scared or feels personally exposed, that I and everyone else here at Grubhub will fight for your dignity and your right to make a better life for yourself and your family here in the United States"

I wonder what happens if somebody tells him "I voted for Trump, and now I'm scared and feel personally exposed".

I don't know how to view this. Clearly Matt wants to protect his employees from bigotry to not make them feel scared. But now the Trump supporters may feel scared. In this company, are they turning from a perceived oppressed minority into an actual one?

It's all very paradox-head-explosiony, and there aren't good answers.
Will Trump's Victory Be Silicon Valley's Wake-Up Call?
The space umbrella concept.

We may have to do it eventually, seeing as climate science is drowning under a flood of irrationality and lies.
You realize that these places are supposed to be breaks where people don't have to deal with others constantly saying they shouldn't exist, right? That's what the LGBTQ spaces are for, that's what the POC spaces are for, and that's what the immigrant spaces are for.
If they predict a 20% chance of rain, and it does rain, that doesn't show dishonesty.

The second point needs a citation.
That needs to start with Trump as he picks rabidly anti-gay Ken Blackwell to his transition team.

http://m.dailykos.com/stories/1596184
I agree with you but the issue at hand is can a doctor determine with 100% certainty you won't experience a conscious thought again? I'm not convinced they can. (This is also an issue with euthanasia)
You know you got some seriously good thought when your karma starts to swing like that. The opposite is, all of my posts with more than 30 points are stupidly obvious stuff that nobody would miss, but were slightly funny on the context.
If that's what you want, I recommend tt-rss: https://tt-rss.org/gitlab/fox/tt-rss/wikis/home

It may be a bit overkill to run on your PC, but I don't know of a better program for that. I also sync it to my tablet every day for offline reading.
What Matt Maloney (Grubhub CEO) said was:

"I want to affirm to anyone on our team that is scared or feels personally exposed, that I and everyone else here at Grubhub will fight for your dignity and your right to make a better life for yourself and your family here in the United States. If you do not agree with this statement then please reply to this email with your resignation because you have no place here."

That's not an statement against supporting Donald Trump, that's a demand for the protection of human dignity and opportunity. Perhaps the author assumes that there are no Trump supporters who support dignity and opportunity for all, an absolutely false generalization.
The statement which he was asking people to agree with being:

"to anyone on our team that is scared or feels personally exposed, I and everyone else here at Grubhub will fight for your dignity and your right to make a better life for yourself and your family here in the United States"

That seems pretty inclusive to me. I have no idea in what way it is 'elitist'.
That's a good way of looking at it. A couple interesting twists are that all the players move simultaneously and the combat is completely deterministic.
What if that belief is that you're fine being an LGBTQ person, and the "challenge" is from people who believe that you shouldn't exist or have the same rights as others?
"Most Americans now say they know the media have exaggerated Trump’s rhetoric and flaws (though I’m not defending him here)"... huh?
the problem is when you try to make the entire university campus a "safe space"
Clearly, this email was a terrible idea. People have a right to their own politics without it affecting their career.

That being said, the statement sounds terrible when summarised like this. The email was (to my eyes) clearly intended as a message of support to those who felt threatened by Trump's policies.

By pairing it with Trump's politics specifically, it is turned into a threat to those who support Trump. Whether the author did this intentionally is pretty irrelevant, he's going to end up threatening those people just as he tried to defend others against being threatened. While he technically didn't say explicitly what the title claims, it's clearly implied (intentionally or not).

If instead, the email had decried actual issues that will (in my opinion) come from the Trump presidency, then that would have been reasonable.

This is, as always, the hard question of how far we have to tolerate intolerance. Generally we draw the line at a call to action, and supporting a candidate definitely doesn't cross that line.
I'm genuinely stumped. If they've fixed this, that's fantastic because I have absolutely shipped code with this bug to a production environment.
Possibly they are useful if your goal is to raise computer-savvy children, however. I never would have learned as much about computers if my school hadn't had ridiculous filtering and blocking software on their networks.

Kind of hard to study for the AP CS test when Bess is blocking the Sun JavaDocs because "hacking"...
AlphaReign – A Private Torrent Search Engine
>world citizen

Unsure if I understood you right, but being a world citizen requires a thick skin. It involves, by definition, dealing with other cultures' nasty bits without complaining.
Difference between "necessary" and "sufficient".

"hold(s) different opinions from oneself" isn't the only characteristic of Nazis, they have other attributes which do justify not tolerating them.

But yes, if it wasn't those attributes, you could still "tolerate" them, in the sense of allowing their opinions to be heard. You don't have to agree. You can even explicitly argue with them.
You are right, but the manufacturing workers see hypocrisy. We have lots of tarrifs in the form of licensing and visa requirements for doctors and lawyers and software engineers. We also have tarrifs on poor people / welfare with visa requirements (except Mexico in practice). Either remove visa requirements on high skill labor, or add tarrifs for external goods. Let usa join European Union if you are not ready to have a global Union.
Conversely, what if this "beating heart corpse" is the one whose organs you or a loved one needs to survive?
This is the same stupid shit as the election. My point is that there is apparent proof of dubious tactics in the wikileaks disclosures, their failure to call te election polling close, and the immeadiate dismissal of the comey announcement.

You can disagree with this evidence, but telling me "you feel" im wrong isnt intellectual.
Not your will. You need a advance medical directive also known as a living will. Wills are for after death.
Replace "style" with "pattern" and "written" with "logically grouped together and written" and you've nailed it.

Very impressive interpretation and summarization of what I wrote!
My guess: Facebook. I talked to them. I flew out. I spent the entire day on their campus and ate a really nice lunch. I wasted my time with them. They were excited to hire me for about $45k/yr less than I was already making.

But don't worry, they'll make it up with about $10k/yr of stock grants which you don't get until you've worked there 4 years.

I picked another lesser-known company and am making - no shit - about $70k/yr more than Facebook was offering. With stock grants that also might be worth about $50k after 4 years, though admittedly, the stocks are a much bigger gamble in this case.
Loneliness and access to other residents (be it minority or not) are related but not the same. If you are cloystered inside your city apartment, it will still be hard to avoid people that you must interact with on a daily basis to support yourself. This fundamental level of cooperation creates opportunities for respect to be formed.
So you bring the machines back but that won't create the levels of unskilled employment from the past, manufacturers employee a fraction of the people they used to.
It's sad that this is old news now. But I'm sure the people who started these universities are still rolling in their graves. These free-thinkers celebrated civil discourse, and built universities to foster the marketplace of ideas. As iron sharpens iron, so one person sharpens another.
For as vocal as the never Trump people were, there was also a quieter never Clinton feeling across many groups.
I read the full post, thanks for writing it. It is very clear, but I do have a couple of questions:

1. In Step (2), Bidirectional RNN: what are you making the forward/backward passes over? How do the tokens get turned into a "matrix" ? What is the dimensionality of this matrix?

2. Step 3 is a bit unclear. Where do Parikh et. al. get their 2 matrices from?

It would be nice to bring in some concreteness: talk about sentences, documents, etc. and how they map into this scheme.

Thanks!
OP et al assert a particular motivation of a general population, which is hardly not generalizing.
If you're experiencing any sort of pain, do not attempt to power through it. It's your body trying to tell you something's wrong. Step away from the keyboard and get some rest.
> Upon regaining composure after reading the email today, I tried to short the stock. Too late. It had already dropped by over 4% — $120 million of shareholder value already incinerated.

> Didn’t he see the firestorm coming? Like I said from my experience, Matt has been a good steward of shareholder money. How could he do something this stupid? I don’t think Matt would have knowingly risked the damage done for political principle.

It's a weird world in which it's unthinkable that you might be willing to risk shareholder value for political principle.
I do not think anyone outside the top 1% could even follow the directions to download and use tor. You are vastly overestimating the compute power of the average person.
> HN being full of sociopaths is well known

citation needed.
They aren't mutually exclusive though.
It depends what 'this statement' is, surely.

For many, many values of 'this', that is totally reasonable. There are ideas that I and my company hold to be sacred, that anyone wanting to challenge needs to find another job.

Accepting intolerance isn't a mark of tolerance.
As a software engineer who knows very little about government security and voting security, can someone explain why you can't just build it like a regular web app (with very good security measures -- the usual HTTPS, database encryption, proper firewall rules to servers, etc.), and have the user enter their voter ID and social security and submit their vote via a web form?

From reading this article, it would seem that it satisfies the first 4 points, just not the 5th. Is that the main reason to have to use the blockchain, to prevent tampering from the inside?
I was blocked. Felt a lot like a paywall to me.