skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Ann Coulter is the defacto Trump advisor on immigration and she can't hide her preference for either only or predominantly white immigration and if that untenable for some reason, just limit it to absolute minimum.

So, it is not just about illegal immigration, this is just a red herring for what it really is at stake here.
I would also like to use Julia more for "throw away" scripts and general automation. Unfortunately, startup time (and sometimes compilation) make this a less fun endeavor than with Python etc.
> What would you expect to happen if the object is modified after being inserted into the dictionary?

This question is sometimes not important: When the mutable object is not mutated.
>You have a indoor plumbing and electricity and always-on internet, correct? You eat three squares a day, right?

So does everyone in America, regardless of race or class.

> Most software developers easily make it into the world's top 5%, if not the top 1%.

I am the only upper middle-class member of my entire extended family. The rest are all lower-middle, blue collar workers - the kind people like you want to kick to the curb with open borders.
I have created Alzheimer Password Manager on the same ideas as this one.

I believe the better idea is to use also user specific salt per browser. In that case, the passwords are more unique, and the threat model changes dramatically.

Current Threat Model:

* No one with an access to the PC with installed extension should be able to authenticate without knowing the correct passphrase.

* The same passphrase used in two different web browsers should produce two different passwords (cryptographic salt will solve this problem).

* If an attacker obtains password for some websites, she should not be able to derive passwords for another websites using that knowledge.

* Attacker should not be able to brute force master passphrase from the salt and knowledge of one password (PBKDF with lots of iterations).

* it provides protection against basic keyloggers (but they can read our salt from the memory / file...)

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/alzheimer-password...

https://github.com/viralpoetry/password-generator
> It takes hours and hours and hours to make a font from an expert designer -- a rare skill set. I do think they generally should be rewarded for good work.

That's pretty much entirely irrelevant. The time anyone takes to put together something is immaterial to the price. The only thing that's relevant is the added value. Putting together a new font has a very marginal added value -- if any -- for end-users such as people using editors or IDEs.

If we're talking about publishing then that's a whole different thing: fonts are a major part of the end design, and they can play a major role in establishing a corporate identity. Playing a part in that does add value, just like incorporating the work of a professional photographer in the corporate image.

But that doesn't mean that any picture taken by anyone suddenly is worth small fortunes, particularly if the photographer wastes too much time taking useless pictures.
It isn't.

The person you replied to was responding to the idea that Twitter is a good source of news.
I don't think it is either. But the post is under the misconception that twitter should be saved because it offers a free speech alternative to the other social media outlets.
Tech Fears the Unknown with a President Trump
I can't speak for others, but I read about two paragraphs of his blog-diarrea and suffered instant hate of the guy. Truly sounds like he has his head firmly up his arse.
There's definitely a load of Stockholm Syndrome in my post, but I really think that Xcode is a pretty decent IDE compared to most other IDE's bar Visual Studio and JetBrains products.

I'm also a big time Storyboard user, which can be a really great tool in expert hands.
Cal Crutchlow No Man Is an Island
I have some experience of this in the UK at least. Here we have feeds from the likes of the press association as well as the official results coming from the electoral commission. However, networks may have their own people at some or all of the counts. These would be local journalists who are attending the counts and will feed news stories back to the studio during the night. They will also get the results from the returning officer and call them in.

In the UK at least we aren't meant to release the results until the returning officer reads them out so waiting for any of the above while showing a live feed of a result would mean we don't have the result to show on screen immediately. For this reason you would likely also have people in the studio watching the live feeds from counts and entering the numbers which would then be double checked against the official feed later. This can be tricky when the result is drowned out by cheering from a crowd of supporters! ie "Labout party, John Candidate 22 thousand... <WOOOOOO - YEAAAH> ...hundred and 1 votes"

The focus for news orgs is getting these results out accurately before their competitors, no one wants to be slow to announce the results.
The Trump campaign has only promised to enforce the existing US law.

However, the tenor of the campaign in the american press and social media has such that the left is convinced that they are going to be sent to robot death camps constructed for people who vote democrat. The right was concerned about the opposite until they won.

For many of the young and educated democrats this is the first time they have lost an election. The hysteria will pass. And then we will see where it all goes
I found in a quick google search: https://tfetimes.com/free-c-books/

Maybe it's something for a DMCA takedown, but it doesnt look like the average pirating website(i surely dont know how they look like, was never on one, i swear!)

EDIT: Please elaborate why that get downvoted. I seriously dont know.
I could understand, if it gets FLAGGED, but... it didn't.
The stages of grief are denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. Since it's 9:37am the morning after I'm guessing many people are at anger moving into bargaining right now. "I'm mad and if I move to Canada it will show everyone and solve my problems". We should be moving into acceptance by the weekend. No need to DDOS this poor site.
May be, just may be, after these elections the USA will pause and think about how we got here in the first place? when the only choices we got left are the "same old crooked politician" vs "egocentric billionaire with bathroom fixtures made of gold".

As George Carlin would say: "This is the best we got folks. These are the best people the country got to offer! So.. ENJOY the circus!!"
Or maybe people shunned you because you are an inconsiderate, spoiled, full of himself narcissist? You seem to think that those women who have been promoted shouldn't have simply because they were women. Maybe they were better than you. Ever thought of that?

> We need a return of solidarity

So you are voting for a party who's main concept is spewing hatred against minorities?

> But if people could get enough solidarity to help me get my life fixed

Why the fuck should leftists, right-wingers, socialists, or nazis sort your life out? You are a grown man. Sort it yourself.
I've never been to either, but I was under the impression that in both Australia and NZ, there were lots of critters willing to bite/sting you without notice.

I know that a lot of countries on earth have nasty little things lurking around, but is it really that much more dangerous in Australia than in NZ then?
They weren't - Clinton won a comfortable majority of primary voters. Bernie voters simply overstate how much support he had among the Democratic base.
You're right.

This hatred is about Muslims, immigrants, deportation forces, bad trade deals, "stop-and-frisk" and rights reductions, and anti-liberalism.

Change Muslims for Jews, and well...
Bravo. Full disclosure, I voted for HRC. However, I've been saying this to my liberal friends for the entire election cycle. The message from of all of my liberal Facebook friends has been some derivative of:

"Hear me out. We know Hillary isn't the best candidate, but you have to vote for Trump. If you don't you're a racist misogynist. Also, if you vote for a third party candidate, you are basically voting for Donald Trump."

There are so many things wrong with that message, that I won't go into it, but the last bit about a third party vote == a vote for Trump is dismissive, condescending, wrong, and rude. The assumption is that the third party voters are reasonable people who would otherwise vote Democrat but for the fact that they have a few misgivings about HRC.

However that is a very poor assumption.

Not once did I hear any of those same people listen to anybody, Trump supporter, third party voter, no voter. They shouted over everyone else and smugly and overconfidently assumed everyone was listening to them.

I am as shocked as anyone Trump won, but I had been telling my liberal friends for months that people just don't like HRC. I have my reasons for why I think that's true and it has nothing to do with emails or Bill Clinton's past indiscretions. Her primary run against Obama in '08 is proof positive of this, and in many ways this general election is a near repeat of that process.

She and her supporters were overly confident, refused to believe that they weren't connecting with mainstream America, and then got blindsided when the votes were counted.

I truly hope that the democratic party learns something from this, but from what I've seen on my Facebook feed this morning it certainly doesn't feel like it's going in that direction.
I'm seriously considering switching citizenship now - I've lived in Norway long enough that I can, although I'm not sure how long the process will take or cost.
Explore the Human Genome with the SciPy Stack
This is absolutely horrifying. To know that there are so many rural, angry white men who are so driven by hatred. There are just no words. This is a huge win for racism, misogyny and hate. I just don't know how this disgusting country is going to survive.
I'm not dismissing it.

Where I am people have a centuries past idea that our neighbouring regions are our enemy, we're so different, look hire different it cultures are. Having traveled more widely than is the norm here (an area of the UK) it seems very similar and the supposed differences in culture look like similarities.

It's like people tell me my kids are very similar in appearance, to me they seem very different. The differences in human culture in some areas are like "well they a clog dance wearing bells but we do it with ribbons, see how different we are".

We seem often to look for the differences and use them as a way to "other" people, that is to separate from them. I think we should be guarded towards that, particularly when the differences are things politicians have decided for us to emphasise and express.

I'll bet there are many similarities between people either side of USA borders. However, as you say you are then looking at long-term indigenous populations compared to more recent immigrants (European settlers). The cultural aspects influenced by conquistadors and those from French and British culture will bear some similarity, I'd expect.
Trump and is running mate Pence want to appeal Roe vs Wade, I wouldn't exactly call that "wishy-washy" on abortion.
Given the rest of his political standing it's pretty clear that putting women's rights back a few decades is definitely on his agenda.
Trump, in my estimation, hacked his way into the White House. He recognized key vulnerabilities in the way the media handles politics and exploited them for all they're worth, putting his meagre resources where they counted, and ignoring everything else. This allowed him to remain the underdog right up until he won the election.

These vulnerabilities are going to be fixed in the next four years. There's just too much at stake for it to be otherwise.
There is no such thing as a civil war in Ukraine.
The best thing I can suggest is regular, invisible backups. Ensure that it's very difficult for them to avoid doing the backups, and make sure that what ever holds the backups is a battle-hardened.

Social engineering is a broad problem right now, and all you can really do is be prepared to pick up the pieces after the fact.
I believe the parent was referring to iTerm's native understanding of tmux windows which is certainly not supported in all terminal emulators.
Trump never won it, Hilary lost it and responsible for it
Well, clearly the country can benefit from American talent.
Hey there, I've got some experience in Deep Learning. I'd be interested in it. You can email me at admin at ingemini.com
When CNN puts up a lower third scroll of Twitter commentary, do you think all those people are tech enthusiasts and media wonks?

You might not know people personally, but certainly you're aware of Twitter's role in the Arab Spring. And you've heard of Black Twitter, right?
I have built my own drone, for racing, but also for toying with soldering, electronics and repairability, but I also follow the commercial offerings. Most of my friends are getting a DJI Mavic, even though they already own GoPro cameras for their quadcopters.

A Karma will cost you, if you already own a suitable GoPro, $800. If you don’t already have a GoPro that fits the Karma, you can get the Karma bundled with either a Hero5 Session for $1,000 or a Hero5 Black for $1,100.

That includes the drone, the stabilisation gimbal rig, the remote, and the padded backpack.

In comparison a DJI Mavic Pro is $999.

They were beaten by DJI that launched a week after them, and people are more interested in the Mavic, that combined with them not having shipped a whole lot of them (they are even canceling orders now because of this issue) is why you see such low sale figures.
As a fan of decentralized, distributed, and federated messaging protocols (such as but not limited to gnu social), I do agree that the name is not ideal for non-techies...But i guess it could be worse...bad examples off the top of my head:

* Gnu Comrade-gram

* Gnu IMeer (like rocketeer, but also not coincidentally sounds like "I am here")

* Gnu FreeMess (as in "free messaging"...no not free in beer, but free as in liberty, because it allows for...doh, nevermind!)

* Gnu LibPost

* Gnu SocMe (short for social media)

I'm sure there could be even worse names with more time. :-)
I'd like to offer a more optimistic view.

The true advantages of democracy are things that are rarely talked about and which people are mostly unaware. In my opinion, they are:

1. The availability of non-violent ways to push for change and seek redress.

2. A way to reliably and peacefully transition from one leader to another.

These are big problems with non-democratic governments. If people don't feel like they have a chance to change the system from within, they'll eventually resort to violence. If there isn't a widely agreed upon way to choose the next leader and transition power to them, then there will be succession struggles.

In a healthy democracy, people are encouraged to seek change politically, and the people accept the outcome whatever it may be.

As Scott Alexander put it in his Anti-Reactionary FAQ: "If you remember nothing else about the superiority of democracies to other forms of government, remember the fact that in three years, we will have a change of leadership and almost no one is stocking up on canned goods to prepare for the inevitable civil war."

Note that these advantages do not depend on making good choices. They only require the availability of choices, and widespread acceptance of the outcomes. Obviously, making good choices would be really nice, but they aren't the best feature of the system.

This is actually what troubles me most about Trump. Bad policies and terrible morals are one thing, but he directly attacked the very notion of democracy itself. All the talk of the election being rigged and perhaps not accepting the results is setting up his followers to reject the entire system, not just his opponents. And I find myself sincerely wondering if he'd willingly leave office in 2021 if he loses the next time around, or in 2025 if he wins.
6 TOP FAT-BURNING PLANT FOODS
Now that religious social issues like gay marriage and abortion have been essentially settled, we have been in the beginning of a trend where left-wing politics begins to align with religion. We are already seeing with people using religious arguments for things like social programs and environmentalism. FFS the Pope said people should vote for Hillary.
>You still pay US income taxes while an expat as long as you have your citizenship.

Misleading.

You are compelled to file taxes in the US. It's quite unlikely that an American living abroad must actually pauy tax on foreign-earned income.

https://www.irs.gov/individuals/international-taxpayers/fore...
How Trump Reshaped the Election Map
> support but not among groups known to show up to actually vote

The same people that helped Trump just win the White House: Poor, mostly white, mostly working class, mostly men.
slight nitpick: acceptance speech
Yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12899886
I"m glad we didn't elect a corrupt politician. Trump's a gamble, but it's a better choice.

#SilentMajority made their minds clear today.
Well that is working out horribly so far. Fusion 8.5.x is unusable on 10.12 due to a bug that causes an immediate crash when grabbing input control. I as well as many others reported the bug long ago but they have been unable to fix it. No surprise - the outsourced team is probably still scratching their heads trying to figure out what's what.
Rent is about the only thing in Norway that's cheaper, though. (And it's far more expensive in Oslo than most of the US, no?)

That said, loved Norway when I visited
A whole coalition of groups with different reasons for not voting for Clinton.

I'm just pushing back against the "unprecedented Trump blowout" narrative. So far he's got less popular votes than the loser of the last presidential election (Romney got 60,933,504 votes. Trumps at 59,088,517 with 98% of precincts reporting. He probably won't pick up another 1.8 million votes).

A different argument is that Trump attracted new people to the polls. I'd be more inclined to believe that many of those people are sick of establishment politics and their tactics. But I don't think they are actually a majority of Trump's support.
There is no valid immigration 'debate' its just ignorant assholes blaming other people for their personal troubles. STFU and get add value to the world for once
I am not saying it is easy, only that it is the easiest when compared to e.g. manufacturing or services. You can't exactly outsource a dentist or barber to India and outsourcing manufacturing is a hugely expensive and complicated task, with a ton of logistics involved.

Compared to that moving software development to another country is much simpler. It is difficult to get it right, but it is simpler to move things like specifications and code than containers of raw materials and goods.
Different uses of baking soda for your beauty
> By talking about real issues that nobody else even dares to touch.

Please enumerate them in a coherent fashion.
Seems like an extremely saturated market.
Not having a girlfriend, not being able to pull girls, not being to have sex, ... are all reasons that in my opinion are the root of terrorism.

If these kids would get sex, they would bomb themselves.

Now someone bring that up as an explanation to vote FN. This aligns with my theory.
Florida's Latino population is unusual (relative to the rest of the country) because of all the people who settled there after fleeing Cuba. It's typical for them to vote and identify heavily Republican based on issues around US-Cuba relations (Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz are both of Cuban ancestry, for example).
That's actually more than here in France :(
You don't sound like a normal person.
At https://democracyclub.org.uk/, for the UK, we ran live election results for our open data feeds on our YourNextMP project. That was basically just someone sitting in front of the TV putting in results as they came in :)
Karma's a bitch
My main worry is that he'll start a disastrous war in a fit of pique. He already said he'd start a war with Iran if they made rude gestures at our sailors. If that's what he says when he's trying to win votes, what will he do once he's secure in office?

Clinton is more interventionist than I'd like, but at least her proposed interventions have some sort of thought and reasoning behind them, even if I may not agree with them.
The folks over at anonymous were bombarding the site according to some of the shadier 4chan boards.
When you say that to your own supporters what you're saying is "I know that some of you don't have as much education as you may have wanted. You're welcome here, and will be listened to."

Instead of that, the Democrats ran on "stupid people are mad because they are poor. We smart, enlightened people should make them shut up, and show them that this isn't their country anymore." i.e. "We will herd the poorly educated."
If this actually happened, people in the interior wouldn't be able to afford the food they were selling.
America: Grab life by the pussy
...and being racist has become okay on hacker news.
An AI that correctly predicted the last 3 elections says Trump will win
You haven't said anything about how different you are. you just keep repeating words, expecting it to mean something to people. Use examples
"What sort of organizing principle would the world have then?"

I don't know if this is what is likely to happen, but I've been pondering this: The Westphalian order for the world, which we currently live under, involves drawing borders for countries, and then basically insisting that the governments within those borders must have some sort of unity, regardless of what those borders are, do, or come from.

Do you have a group of people that are geographically localized but have borders going right through the middle of them, like the Kurds? Then they are not a country, not countrymen, and regardless of their affiliations they are subject to their country's policies for dealing with each other. The split of East and West Germany was an extreme case of this, where a national border was drawn, and you had families cut in half.

Do you have bunches of people that basically loathe each other with the fire of a thousand suns, but there's a border drawn around them on the world map? Then they live together, until the most pathological cases like Yugoslavia finally just blow apart.

And where did these borders come from? Did some bureaucrats in Europe in the 1700s or 1800s draw some conveniently straight lines in Africa? You're a country now in the 21st century, regardless of how anyone local feels about that. Pretty much anywhere in the world you see a straight line border you see something very artificial that took no account of conditions on the ground.

In the 1990s, the cyber utopians thought that technology would lead to more decentralization. With improved technology, you don't need industrial-era practices to deal with cities and counties and states and countries. You can have very sophisticated government and government services now at much smaller polities; even the small local cities take online payments now, for instance, and have online billing.

Perhaps the future looks like the Westphalian system cracking up, and polities being more willing to secede, easily join together in arrangements of convenience as needed, and easily break apart again as their interests diverge. There are certainly a lot of practical issues involved in that transition, but as diversity increases all around the world, there's increasingly a lot of practical issues involved in forcibly jamming people together because of borders drawn 200+ years ago. It wouldn't solve war; that's not on the table. But it might just prevent World War III.