skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The author was intentionally writing around the fact that these "undocumented immigrants" are illegal. When someone purposefully obfuscates an issue, I'll call a spade, a spade, and say the writing is pure ignorance.
At Faraday, we're also been running Docker in production for over a year, and we're very happy with how well things have been working.

As nzoschke recommends, we rely heavily on ECS, RDS and other managed services. We are very careful about using exotic new Docker features until somebody else has successfully used them in production. We use DNS, load balancers and regular networking for discovering containers and communicating between them.

And it all basically just works. The worst problem we've encountered is that twice a year, we deploy a new version of ecs-agent to our staging cluster and need to revert it because of issues.

For us, the biggest challenge has been setting up a good local workflow for developing Docker apps with multiple services and multiple underlying git repositories. The docker-compose tool is great but it doesn't go far enough and doesn't provide enough structure. We've open sourced some our internal Docker dev tools here http://blog.faraday.io/announcing-cage-develop-and-deploy-co... but we think there's a lot more which could happen to make it easy to develop complicated apps.
well, you did say that he wants to control what you can say by opening up libel laws
Reagan did: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Reagan#Early_political_...

And then he became governor of California before becoming president.
Only if you design your tests that way. Tests are just software. If a change to one part of a software system requires massive changes to another part of that same system; then the system is poorly designed. Indeed, that may be the very definition of poor design.

So if a change to your production code causes large changes to your test code, then one, or the other, or both are poorly designed. You have neglected the design. You have allowed couplings to proliferate.
Should successes and failures of space robots curb ambition of a Mars mission?
That video is what most of us were thinking, yes, but I now see that there were people who called it, they just couldn't say it loudly or repeatedly enough to be taken seriously because they would be shouted down and ostracized, exactly as happened in the video. The parent just said it. Scott Adams was working his persuasion theory (ok, he is one who wasn't afraid to say it loudly or repeatedly). There were others in quiet little corners of the internet who believed that Trump supporters existed en masse but had retreated into the woodwork and would come out to prove the polls wrong.
In defense of hunting and fishing, sportsmen and their outfitters tend to be the strongest proponents of environmental protection. This distinction does somewhat favor fishing over hunting, but hunting does serve as an important backstop against explosive population growth in the absence of apex predators.

- http://fishpondusa.com/about/corporate-responsibility

- http://wamu.org/news/11/05/23/deer_overpopulation_yields_dis...
I understand the ban on child porn is justified via the interstate commerce clause:

Federal jurisdiction is implicated if the child pornography offense occurred in interstate or foreign commerce. This includes, for example, using the U.S. Mails or common carriers to transport child pornography across state or international borders. Additionally, federal jurisdiction almost always applies when the Internet is used to commit a child pornography violation. Even if the child pornography image itself did not traveled across state or international borders, federal law may be implicated if the materials, such as the computer used to download the image or the CD Rom used to store the image, originated or previously traveled in interstate or foreign commerce.

https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-fede...

Theoretically, would a general citizen be exempt from the ban if he manufactured his own CD-ROMs, and his own CPUs in-state?

It might be illegal for them to operate the sites for extended periods of time. It doesn't seem illegal for them to deploy malware as part of an investigation. I'm looking at (f) here:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030

So the worst that could happen is that the evidence gets thrown out. If they weren't going to otherwise be able to nab the person, the worst that could happen is they lose the case.
Intellectual property shouldn't exist because it grants a monopoly on ideas which is a violation of property rights. It's an unnatural monopoly.
GoPro Karma Recall and Return Information
But you are checking different facts.

The original fact being checked was:

> never in the history of history have people fought against discrimination, corruption, and oppression by saying "but they might have a point too"
The only AV I have love for is MBAM, not the real-time protection but the plain old system scan.
Two minor points:

Trump got more votes than Romney: http://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/did-trump-actua... and http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/442086/donald-trumps-vo...

Clinton represents the status quo for corruption, as evidenced by the continuing questionable practices of the Clinton Foundation, and people who have been upset with the way politics work correctly and directly linked her with that behavior.
Alpakka: Akka Streams Connectors
Once you get old enough your doctor can't really say no.
Trump's strategy worked brilliantly on social media. Here's the strategy in a nutshell:

1) Say something outrageous that news orgs will grab for a quick, clickbait story that will generate tons of ad revenue.

2) Let outraged people share via social media.

3) Benefit as some of the people seeing the content will not disagree and will take the candidacy seriously.

4) Win.

It doesn't matter what Facebook does with its trending section, the real value of Trump's strategy came with the way it exploits the basic sharing / newsfeed mechanism's intended behavior. Even today, many Trump opposers think that they were helping by posting their outrage at every rude comment Trump said.
Because of this sentiment, western nations are going to be leaps and bounds behind China and other nations when it comes to technologies /treatments derived from CRISPR.

When George Church and ithers called for a moratorium on CRISPR based research, Chinese scientists said suit yourself and cintinued doing research on it. When the day comes that wr can cinduct research like this with simulations and can spare beasts unnecessary pain, im all for it.

I find it more peculiar that people will treat a dog or other subhuman creature better then they will homeless person.
I was responding to someone claiming that a majority voted for Trump, which is a falsifiable statement. My response was to use the quickest, factual statement to counter it (Clinton had the largest block of the popular vote, therefore Trump must be under 50%). Perhaps I should have responded with the actual percentages (which showed they were both under the 50% mark), but there's no need to read into my writing statements that I did not make.
Ignoring availability & mirroring (and all other cloud enabled features) for conversation's sake:

Can't the above be orchestrated via docker-compose?

(I've been using docker with docker-compose for my side projects but not been using it excessively in customer facing production)
An NPR politics podcast had mentioned that Trump always responds to the last statement from the other side, even if it's irrelevant to the rest of the statement. Clinton leveraged that during the debates.

I can imagine foreign diplomats quickly catching onto this and using it to their advantage in discussions.
This is absolutely fantastic and its a great step in the right direction but we are still years if not decades away from being able to circumvent spinal lesions in humans.

One of the major problems with human spinal lesions is the loss of control of the trunk of the body (ie the core). Humans have dozens of muscle groups that control balance and posture through minute movements. Without fine grain control over these muscles balance is going to be extremely difficult.
The problem then boils down to what's an acceptable percentage, no?

I mean, 99% is off limits, but what about 98%? 95%? where's the cut off?

I don't think gene commonality is a useful metric for this. Not really sure what would it be though, and I agree that it seems creepy to do experiments on an animal that looks a lot more like you than a worm or a rat.

But I also think it's appalling the way we treat our food sources and would love for this to improve, regardless of whether they look like me or not, and regardless of the amount of genes we have in common. Just out of basic respect for life (I also don't like cutting trees and plants just because).

Unfortunately I still like meat and bacon and other cow products, and while I try to eat less red meat, it's very hard to do.
This isn't a personal attack, but I think your choice of language shows just how pervasive that thinking was.

Very nearly half of the electorate believed in a Trump presidency enough to mark him down at the ballot box. Those people aren't "no one". Simply looking at the Trump presidency as a lack of voter turnout because people were in their own personal bubble fails to give those people and their ideas any credence.

If we are going to have a real conversation about diverse ideas in this country, it needs to include all of them, not just whatever happens to be popular at the moment. Maybe some ideas turn out to be irreconcilable, but we should at least try to understand them and recognize that they exist.
Except that the Trump administration is who will be doing that additional profiling and exhibiting xenophobia.

That makes Trump's administration racist and makes the people who voted for Trump seem to appear racist. Though, as we've agreed, most of them aren't.
Did he get any assault convictions? If I said I'd like to kill my boss would you call the SWAT team on me?
This was very likely inspired by http://www.trudeaumetre.ca, which so far has done a great job watchdogging the Canadian government.
I've been running Docker in production for half this time and got pretty much to the same conclusion. ECS has its issues, but is still much more manageable than anything else (on AWS). And if started today, would've definitely used Convox (iirc, at the time you didn't support private subnets).

I never liked Cloudwatch Logs and recently switched it for an ELK stack (hosted by logit.io).
The Economist had a very compelling graphic for how the polling went wrong [0]. Essentially, results were within the margin of error, but the errors (positive and negative) in a given state were strongly correlated with the percent of the white electorate with no college education.

538 made the compelling (and in the end, sadly accurate) statistical point that modeling errors in polls are very likely to be correlated across states, not independent like a lottery.

Nate Silver's reputation went up again for me in this election.

[0] - http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21710024-how-mid...
I do not like LinkedIn. And I don't like Russia's approach to Internet governance. So I appreciate every punch dealt in this conflict. Can't be cheering though when I know that projects which I do like get the same treatment.
The utter pointlessness of the Python 3 changes pretty much killed the language for me. print-as-function helped pretty much nobody, and I'm seriously starting to think i18n is a mistake.

What date does 1/2-3 mean?

I've had raids cancelled when we agreed on 19:45, but showed up an hour late because he didn't realize that nobody plans raids in GMT.

Är det inte störande när folk börjar prata ett främmande språk mitt i sin post? Å it ens Google Translate hjälp nä dialekt kom i bildn. And as a non-native English speaker, I'd also much rather have the original English version of whatever you're doing, than the half-baked translation that's missing tons of features that are always "coming soon".

No, Unicode-as-default didn't cause this, but the switch shows a switch in culture towards making i18n easy.
I was under the impression Ubuntu is re-shipping the upstream debian python2x and 3x packages. Are your maintainers packaging 2x from scratch? If so...why?
But Trump didn't actually address it. He acknowledged the problem but didn't provide any tangible solution other than "I'm going to bring your jobs back" which is never going to happen. As you said, rural manufacturing was a buble.
Prices are climbing because they're harder to get now but yes on point 2.
Heh, you've got a point, but simple brand recognition, or even making me aware of a product could be sufficient (I don't exactly buy into The Hidden Persuaders thesis, read about half of it back in the '70s and ... wasn't persuaded ^_^).

How many "X company is shutting down" HN items have you seen where you've never heard of the company in the first place?
Stop kicking yourself. Stop kicking yourself. Stop kicking yourself...
Thank you for sharing your view.
This headline could be retitled: "Silicon Valley calls upon Facebook to use more aggressive censorship"
If Amazon didn't already have such a long-standing terrible reputation about how it treats its employees (both warehouse and corporate), its business partners, (Hachette) etc. it wouldn't be the default reaction. Amazon's actions have consequences.
I always thought he and Leonard Nimoy were merging visually as they aged.

Here he looks like...some random but famous actor whose name escapes me:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Q8IlTmpaTiQ/Vnq3CrkSOnI/AAAAAAAAxY...
Of course not - the election should be cancelled, the votes should be thrown into a garbage can and it should just be you who picks the best candidate.
I will partially excuse the protestors for that because in any big protest you will always draw people looking for an opportunity to just do something bad. However, with people like Joe Stump advocating violence I cannot believe all of the violence isn't random bad actors.
TLDR: There isn't an actual plan to make Ruby 3x faster, it's just a bullshit number Matz made up to be cute. Instead there will be some marginal improvements here and there, as per usual.

Some vague references to the idea of building a JIT are discussed. Rubinius already does this, but they apparently long ago decided that Rubinius doesn't exist, so I guess that's off the table.
We've been through this several times. HN will settle down.
So how can you explain the rationale?
http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/11/10/501...

Of Brigade's verified voters, 40 percent of registered Democrats pledged to vote for Trump.

I guess we can argue about wording or say the data is wrong, but this is what NPR said this morning.
I use that style, from time to time, because I like it. ;-)
Do you think we'll reach a point where computers end up in this vetoed manner?

I see it has happened with iOS, despite widespread popularity (yes I have an iPad for reading), and I see GateKeeper etc. on Mac and warnings about unsigned apps on Windows 10 but it hasn't quite got to the "you can't run what you want" stage yet.

It is almost like they (Apple and Microsoft) are trying to outdo each other in locking down machines (arguably sensible for some users). I wonder where it will stop.
I think this article is mixing up three different things which is counterproductive when you're trying to convince people. Just go to the point (not the pointS).

1. Defender is not the best AV out there from a strict efficiency perspective (IMHO, Defender is good enough for most people and is quiet enough & bloat less enough compared to a lot of the competition).

2. Killing the competition in the specific AV domain is bad for security (IMHO, perfectly valid point).

3. MS is globally trying to kill any competition by abusing its dominating position (IMHO, another perfectly valid point).

2 & 3, while absolutely true, are shadowed by 1 which is a very questionnabe point.

Too bad.
Meh. Apple is a tyrant and they're worse than Microsoft has ever been. Furthermore, Apple sucks for business computing.

There's a reason that every business on the planet runs Windows and that the Mac only has a piddly ~7% market share.

The difference between Microsoft and Apple is that Microsoft usually corrects their big mistakes while Apple defends theirs to the death. That's why (among many, many other issues) Mac users were forced to buy one-button mice for 15 years and that's why they could only resize a window by the lower right corner until around 2007. LOL!

There's also a reason that Windows is orders of magnitude more secure than "the Mac OS" - it gets attacked way more often.

- http://www.ibtimes.com/nope-apple-computers-arent-more-secur...
Sad day. The year of the great dead continues.
> Is it fair to acknowledge that the feelings expressed in the articles you reference are valid feelings and feel true to the people who share them?

Yep!

These sensitivities are learned though. And being overly sensitive is bad for social cohesion.

A certain discipline needs to be enforced to allow society function.

The right is about tough love. The left is about coddling.

This is entirely 100% debatable though. This is the debate that should be happening IMHO. What are the side-effects if no one has to feel a bad feeling or ever be offended.

> Edit: Is it fair to acknowledge that the people of the United States have a history of discriminating against minorities?

Absolutely. But not for a long time.

We had a black president. A female can extremely close to becoming the president. Etc. Etc.

To argue that the system is against you because of your race is a hard argument to swallow now.
I live in Switzerland, which has strict policies on naturalization. My wife is a scientist (postdoc mathematician), so we have to travel a lot between countries — in Europe, mobility is a significant part of academic culture. Each time (4 times, in fact). Each time, our "uninterrupted time spent in Switzerland" counter was reset.
You've only convinced me that you don't really understand what people mean when they say "check your privilege."
>I can't imagine any of my friends saying that kind of thing

These comments always make me chuckle. You live in a squeaky clean world that I've personally never experienced and I'm not really sure where you go do find it. I mean, hell, browse around on any popular image sharing site for 5 minutes and you'll see worse comments in any thread with a vaguely attractive female.

If you've ever been in a men's bathroom, you've overheard these types of obnoxious conversations. But collectively, America loves to gasp and shout about how utterly shocking it is that people would talk in such a manner! Outrageous! "Well, I never!"
This is actually tough to do, I'll see if I can find a comprehensive list of the emails. I was following the leaks as they came out and so many of them referenced Bernie that the narrative in the Clinton campaign became clear. I'll reply with what I find for you.
No, but his financial and verbal support for Trump before the election colors his participation in the administration.
I would say the worst that could happen is the FBI is knowingly distributing child pornography, providing access to illegal materials and re-victimizing minors.
And an election should decide who should be the one to allocate those resources with the people's best interest in mind. That's literally what happened.
I'm a web dev since the beginning. Of all the frameworks I've worked with, Knockout has the most utility for the least obtrusiveness.
I would assume it's because monkeys are more intelligent than the animals we tend to eat; cows, chickens, sheep & pigs.

Also, intentionally paralysing a creature, leaving it to live in that condition, and then performing experimental surgery/procedures on it is significantly different than slaughtering it.

Whilst I appreciate the scientists mean well, and I do understand how this could benefit humanity; this sort of research still seems unethical to me, and at the very least makes me feel sick.

As a software developer and reverse engineer, this feels like hacking anyway. It's not particularly scientific just to "capture and replay" data without much understanding of how it works.
The size of docker images ended up being the reason we aren't using it. Transfering them took forever, and so if we had an emergency update to make, we'd have to go outside our normal routines, which is brutal.

I'm sure we'll end up finding another way that's similar (provides the same benefits for us) but without such crazy image sizes.
The figure I've seen cited for rhesus monkeys 93%, with cows around 80%. But why are you so concerned about genetic similarity? Isn't the more important question how sentient and capable of suffering they are? If we discovered alien beings with human-like intelligence and sentience that didn't share our DNA, would you prefer experimenting on those?
No, entrapment is when law enforcement induces you to commit an offense you wouldn't otherwise do.

If you use a cp site of your own free will without encouragement from law enforcement, then it's not entrapment just because the site was operated by law enforcement.
The Fallacy of ReUse (2009)
The real cognitive dissonance is testing on them or slaughtering them for food vs. pampering them and trying to save endangered species, etc. The testing is often worse since it may involve torture and/or mutilation.
Why not?

Did everything that was interesting in 2001 suddenly become uninteresting?
You're right, the names are badly choosen.

In every function the same is happening, streams are created/wired up with other streams.

The differentiation here seems to be, that the Model function just wires up streams for the data, the View function just wires up streams for the display and the Intent function just wires up streams for the interactions.
Highway to Hitler [pdf]