skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
That number sounds a bit large to me (2500€ per capita is a lot!). Do you have some more information? Can't find any mention of such a programme. https://www.bmbf.de/de/der-haushalt-des-bundesministeriums-f...
A Very Simple Genetic Algorithm Written in Swift 3
http://carlosmariscal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/logical...
The two biggest thorns in my side with go have been rectified in go 1.8

Multiple result sets
Sorting slices
But the punch line to my statement was:

"Then we win the election because you missed the point."

As in, ignore the message at your own peril, we don't have to care because we are content now.

But in the Muslim's case, the implications for us ignoring their message are more profiling, xenophobia, etc. Which is why I would argue they need to look internally to resolve the issues inside their communities.
There's a lot of truth to this. There's something in the culture about excluding poor whites from being accepted as an oppressed class. (Literature should soon come out on this.) They're called names. This inconsistency is ruthlessly exploited by the right wing.

The Clinton future was bleak for the working class (not just whites), let's admit it. She ran as the least worst, expecting that'd be enough. While Trump's climate change denial alone is enough to make him more dangerous, and he will probably ruin the white working class way more, there's a reason Clinton lost.

[Edit: not that I agree with everything this person says. White and male supremacy are obviously huge elements. Poor black women are far less privileged than poor white men. But one should listen & understand.]
If the argument is "don't DIY" then the software is kinda broken. The whole purpose of a software project is to have users... use it. If you're going the way of outsourcing why stop at using ECS, just pay someone to run your software business and focus on... idk, marketing?
Yes, you have to rebuild your image to deploy a new version.
But are you really changing code in production on the fly? This seems dangerous.

Also something that can technically be done with Docker, just it's really not a good idea (and that has nothing to do with Docker).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veil_of_ignorance
Does Qt have something like React?
I am also a former small town Midwesterner. In the 90s, A gay couple moved in a house on the same block where I lived. Even though my parents told me to stay away (like they did with all people we didn't know, even in our "demo"), I don't think it mattered much because we eventually started mowing their lawn. In a mid-size elementary school, I remember a chinese and a black (maybe mixed) family. Another mixed family moved in next door around 2002 (black part was Jamaican). I didn't have a problem with any of them, and neither did anyone else that I knew. By the time I left for college, there were plenty of Mexicans.

My dad worked in a prison, which meant he spent his day around thieves, drug addicts, gangsters, murderers, sexual predators, and the like. He gave fear of those kinds of people to the family, and suspected everyone of being one.
author here;
Didn't know it was supported by Qt, I will put it on my TODO list ;)

edit: can't comment any further currently, I will try to answer everything once I'm unblocked.
For a broader view: https://ballotpedia.org/2016_presidential_candidates_on_LGBT...

Trump himself has gone both directions on some of these issues, so it's hard to understand what his personal position really is, but he's made more statements -- particularly recently -- that indicate opposition to federal protections for LGBT. (I'm choosing my words carefully - he's indicated that he wants to defer many of these issues to the states, when pressed on it.)

It's likely that Trump is - from a personal perspective - one of the more LGBT-friendly republicans, outside of the Log Cabin Republicans crew.

Viewed through the lens of whom he selected as his running mate, the Trump Team (as opposed to Trump himself) is rightly viewed as threatening for both marriage equality and transgender rights. Pence has a very consistent history of voting both against protection for LGBT, as well as actively supporting discriminatory policies such as "don't ask, don't tell" and proactive definitions of marriage as between one man and one woman.
I've recently started using python a lot more, it was a natural progression when I moved from using a windows dev machine to a mac book. One day I needed to do something quick, and python was the quickest way to do it. I typed python into my terminal, saw 2.7, and built from that. I had no incentive to look into upgrading, I had everything I needed to accomplish what I wanted. My good experience then has grown to the point where it's probably the second most common tool in my toolbag, but it's still an "I need to do xyz, and I don't care how it looks I just want to see if this will work". So I still stick with the defaults. I only think about using the latest greatest tools if I think the code I'm writing has long term potential.
The amnesia in this article and many of the comments here is stupefying. Have we all forgotten the things DJT said and did throughout his campaign:

- Called Mexican immigrants rapists and murderers;

- Mocked the physically disabled;

- Used his ownership of a beauty pageant to look at naked women dressing;

- Made threats of political violence;

- Demonstrated a contempt for science;

- Put forth conspiracy theories regarding the President, HRC and climate change;

- The racist (yes, racist) comments he made regarding Judge Curiel;

And this isn't even the half of it. Let's also not forget the behavior of those who showed up at his rallies spewing hatred, racism and xenophobia. That actually happened.

Does the press have issues? Undoubtedly. But to write off the last 18 months and Tuesday's election as "smugness" is to have lost the plot.
I think you miss the point - liberals hate Trump voters.

And if your feeling is that anyone who voted for Trump is worthy only of contempt, then you truly missed the point.

Many are willing to see a failure of empathy in others but not in themselves.
It was a brilliant play by Peter Thiel - it was gamble of 50:50 (I believe he started supporting him only at the Republican Convention).. There would be backlash by technology community, and when you have lot of money and networking available to you; there is no one in the technology community that will stop doing business with you.. Kudos to the HN crowd about the Freedom of Speech, sometimes - I guess you need to be extremist in either being Left Wing or Right Wing..
Taking a guess here: Maybe all the people who are concerned about performance have moved to PyPy?
It is not wise to even implement a lot of logic in the JS part of QML, as the JS interpreter there is quite a bit more primitive than something like V8. Your performance will suffer if you attempt to write anything too complicated in JS inside QML.
Good item, including most especially citing the single person who turned this part of Snopes into a sad joke, and linked it to her clear expressions of Left/Democratic political biases.

This really hasn't been a good year for Establishment Authorities, has it?
> Why don't we have a debate on illegal immigration?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but while you personally may want to have a debate about illegal immigration, the person who you support to represent you (Trump) does not want to debate. He just wants to make a sweeping change without anyone in his path.
looks to me they have maybe changed their stance? See commits.
https://github.com/getsentry/sentry/tree/master/src/sentry/m...
>> Data written in the container is persisted to disk

Even if you don't mount any folder from the disk onto the container? Are you sure? Then everything I know about containers is just wrong.
As far as I remember, if your local virtual environment is Python 3 Ansible doesn't work (might not even install).
That video was posted back in March, during the Republican primaries. I have no idea why you think it's related to the protests this week.
Not defending Microsoft's behaviour with Windows 10, but I'm guessing that an app that replaces parts of windows' shell is not exactly using public Windows API to do so. It's often using hacks and workarounds instead.
There's no backward compatibility here because there wasn't any compatibility to begin with. The same thing is happening on MacOS when applications use undocumented private APIs and for some reason Apple decides to take them away.

Unless the updates really uninstalled the application instead of just breaking it, and that's really (another) bad decision from Microsoft.
As a whole, sure, but real incomes have still been flat for the last 15 years so. The average American worker can feel that his or her standard of living is no longer increasing:

http://www.multpl.com/us-average-real-income
Show HN: Detect secret leaks in any Android app
Amazon also has some undeveloped land that they have turned over to an organization that runs homeless shelters to provide housing for the years in between when the land is developed.

But yes. Amazon is a terrible place to work and we are all just too dumb to quit. Oh, and we all hate homeless people, I guess.
For an early glimpse of this fusion powered future upopia, check out the power of present day fusion power. New generation is coming online at 2.5 cents US per kWh. Compare that to retail electric rates of 15 cents / kWh in parts of the US. Incredible!

And this new fusion power is completely clean and emission free, and what's more, generates no nuclear waste whatsoever! Worst case accident: oops, Fred dropped a solar panel on his toe.
Prove that assumption, please.
These start menu replacements hook into the OS shell on a low level, keeping the old incompatible version installed would (and has, in older versions of Win10) cause the user to _have no task bar, start menu or anything whatsoever_ because the start menu replacement crashes and burns, taking Explorer with it.

See also a similar comment[0] I wrote a while back about the policy to uninstall incompatible software.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12416422
Indeed, the research is a bit unfair. Its not difficult to understand old signals and they reuse it to generate motor effects.
Of course, specific projects might not be covered, but I've seen a lot of people go "ok, just to be safe I'll use 2.7 in case down the road I get to need anything that's Py2 specific".

In your case you know exactly what your needs are, and that they're unsupported in Python 3, but I'm sure that many of those 70% Py2 projects could run just as well in Py3.
I can't think of a better, more appropriate Cohen cover: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGRfJ6-qkr4
Even if she were, what relevance does that have to whether Trum p is "an advocate for the gays"?
It may have been that at first, but you are also implying that there is a left to which that opinion applies. Where is that coming from?

edit: you answered below
You are lying to yourself. I think that you don't even realize that you are doing it it. I guess this explains how somebody can vote for Trump. And if Trump screws up the country you will again lie to yourself as to why you are not responsible. Why your vote for Trump did not matter. And then you will blame everybody else.
They are all pluses, but most of those didn't exist till the last couple years. So effectively the first 6 or so years of Python 3 existing had much less incentive.

I think the flip around - ~30% adoption of a newest version at 1-2 years in - especially one that breaks backwards compatibility isn't bad.

I've started numerous python projects at work over the last year all on 2.7. I think we just started the last one. We're finally ready to jump to 3.
Clinton won the popular vote. I mean short of winning, what else qualifies? I don't subscribe to the idea that the party in an election who received over half the vote is somehow falling apart at the seams.

Pundits do this every time there is an election but in reality it's the swing of the pendulum. The parties and peoples feelings towards them evolve over time and power changes hands between the two parties. Does that mean you need to go cry in a corner and question your reality each time your party loses an election? No it does not.
In some ways it's natural to _reduce_ human experience to its commodified representation (Can't we have Hacker News without the $foo??). But the truth is that there is no boundary between human experience. Your economic, social, and spiritual lives are, in actuality, indistinct.
"However, in terms of objectivity, they are miles ahead of the "unfiltered news" on social media."

There isn't actually a contradiction between the news media being miles ahead of "unfiltered news", and the fact that unfiltered news can show the biases of the media. In a social media age, if the filtered news can have its errors exposed easily, then trust will still decrease in it even if it is, hypothetically, 90% accurate.

Which is probably a great deal more accurate than it actually is, because the "filtered media" has been operating in a space where "nobody" (to a first approximation anyhow) could independently check it for decades and has gotten very used to its ability to filter things unopposed. We don't even have to hypothesize anything about hubris necessarily; it has simply been used to this being the reality in the same way that, say, the Federal government has become used to being the dominant governmental authority. It isn't necessarily "wrong", it just is. This position has left the media unable to deal with any sort of challenge to its authority... even the very confused, chaotic, challenge offered by current social media. They have never needed to develop an "immune system" to that sort of thing, though that's not a perfect metaphor.

It's hard to even judge how right the old media was, because you're measuring a yardstick against itself. How do you know the old media back in the 1990s was that good in the first place? Where are you getting the information you'd use to check that claim? How do you know that the filtered media didn't have things "start[] from a tidbit of information and then twists it to fit whatever narrative they are trying to promote"? It's not exactly hard to find instances of things that look like that in the past; to come up with a non-political example, "moral panics" are not a new phenomenon. D&D had a pretty good one off of a pretty small "tidbit".

A new media ecosystem will arise eventually. Probably some of the old media will manage to up their game enough to compete again. But it's never going to be monolithic again until social media is somehow entirely destroyed. And the social media is going to get better. Diversity is coming to the news industry whether it likes it or not.
Grubhub app faces hate reviews in reaction to his email
I cant help to feel sad for the monkey. I'm not sure this is the way research should be done. Why not try this on a smaller scale animal first before doing it on a monkey?

Also you don"t need to cut the spinal cord todo data analysis.
Can't test now, but around a few tens of milliseconds for about:blank
"The experiments are more of a progression than a sudden breakthrough: they are based on a decade of work in rats, Courtine says, and the monkeys reacted in very similar ways."
'Just breaking it' in the case of these shell enhancers would result in the user having no user interface whatsoever after the upgrade.

Windows' upgrade process could in theory disable the shell extension, but that would be even worse than uninstalling the program given how programs on Windows do not take kindly to being 'half-installed' (case in point: uninstallers that break when some application files are removed).

This is what backwards compatibility leads to, and there is no way all parties can win in this scenario.
I'm not all up on your electoral system but isn't that the whole point of having an electoral college rather than just doing it by simple majority?
The author details here what he did to debug the windows spi driver:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108331#c51
Why should they have laws against dangerous driving? If someone runs into someone else, that's an issue between the two of them that should be resolved with pistols at dawn, the way that gentlemen used to do it.

/s
So where’s the world headed now?
Recruitment giant PageGroup hacked, Capgemini dev server blamed for info leak
Re: libel laws, europe has much much stricter libel laws than US, i don't think they are controlling what we say.
It wouldn't justify Trump doing it, but I'm curious if you supported blackballing Al Gore after he contested the 2000 election with a lawsuit. I've heard a lot of people complain about the Supreme Court, but rarely complain about Al Gore himself for contesting.
Resubmission: Using GRAKN.AI, Python and Pandas to query and model movie data
> Their story began in Missouri where they found a gorgeous barn that needed a second chance. They dismantled the barn and brought it to NYC and rebuilt in in their loft in SoHo.

Huh?
> We need more technologies that just work and can be used SUSTAINABLY in any random place and at any scale

Well that doesn't sound like fusion. At all.
Deportation is the natural result of illegal immigration. You're acting like they didn't know they were committing a crime.

There are proper channels for immigration. If you want to move to a certain country and your first choice is to break their laws; how can you expect to be entitled to anything over there?
>I was just repeating the comment, you'd have to ask the author.

But you are repeating and justifying this comment up and down the thread.
Roman numerals use implied addition and subtraction, not multiplication.

MM may signify million in some contexts, but not in Roman numerals.
"For more than a decade, neuroscientist Grégoire Courtine has been flying every few months from his lab at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne to another lab in Beijing, China, where he conducts research on monkeys with the aim of treating spinal-cord injuries.

The commute is exhausting — on occasion he has even flown to Beijing, done experiments, and returned the same night. But it is worth it, says Courtine, because working with monkeys in China is less burdened by regulation than it is in Europe and the United States"

I personally know researchers who have to take similar measures to be able to do their research.

When we are happy as a society to slaughter billions of animals every year for food (usually keeping them in appalling conditions beforehand) I don't understand how we can justify the restrictions we put on scientists.
I would put it the other way around: that we're all very bad at separating truth from fiction. That's what's terrifying to me. How many people are genuinely bothered by how hard it is to find truth? How many people even think it is hard?

Every caste has a different way of dealing with this uncertainty, but I'd say very few cultures systematically accept that they have no idea what's true and what is not. Every group has a different heuristic that they consider "good enough." Some groups appeal to morality (although each group has different moral guidelines). Some groups appeal to simplicity or aesthetics. Analytically oriented people tend to use probability as their crutch, telling themselves that any truth they deem "unlikely" would be a waste of time to investigate.

When any of these groups is wrong, they vehemently maintain that their heuristic is appropriate and sound. They made the right decision based on what they knew, they tell themselves. The process is infallible, even if the result is unfortunate.

Because the uncertainty of truth terrifies me, I try to keep an open mind. I would hope that this open mind affords me a better "truth ratio," but that's impossible to measure. Every single day I'm disheartened by how hard it is to find actual truth. Even something as simple as checking the sources on a news article can be so difficult (or impossible) that there's no practical way to judge its reasonableness. The more viewpoints you hear, the more you realize that it's impossible to discriminate between them with any sort of actual accuracy; you just rely on heuristics once again. "Oh, this girl stated her argument much more coherently than that guy, so I'm inclined to believe her." Now your heuristic is rhetoric, which may or may not have anything to do with truth. When you try to do your own research, you're swayed by the quantity of arguments or the coherency of the sources or how they match up with what you already think you know. You just make guess upon guess upon guess.

At the end of the line you have academic studies, but no individual is an expert in more than a couple things, so no individual is qualified to vet/interpret/understand the vast majority of the academic literature on the subject. We just make a guess, or we appeal to probability again (i.e. "it seems to me like more academics are saying this, so that's the most likely truth. I'm going to assume anything else is wrong").

I'm not trying to downplay the importance of science or academics here; it's the best we have. But those who are "waking up" to reality after this election—if they follow the thread far enough—are destined to come to an uncomfortable conclusion: there's a limit to how "right" you can ever be.
Would your definition of professional liars include Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama?
My mistake, I was searching for an independent video quickly and linked the wrong one. Thanks for pointing that out.

This is the incident from yesterday that I heard about and was searching for video of:

> Heads roll in the streets of Los Angeles as a large Donald Trump effigy was set on fire by protesters the day after he was elected president.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/11/10/donald-trump-e...
I'm upvoting because I agree that, in my experience, you get no more than what you pay for in relation to anti-virus.

Those free AVs and ones bundled by mega ISPs? Prepare to pay in computer resources, and even then your protection is probably only mostly adequate.

The only true anti-virus is awareness and user education. Risky behavior and unwise reactions to suspicious emails are the two infection vectors that secure software can't stop.
Some seem hard to track:

> Global warming is real, but it's not man-made.

And quite some are bound to be broken:

> The wealthy should pay more.

> Cut taxes for the wealthy big time.
"As an aside, for anyone interested in helping reverse engineer things:
It's possible to get Windows to dump everything it sends on what it calls SPB - basically SPI & I2C. Open the Event Viewer and enable View -> Show Analytic and Debug Logs. Then head to Application and Services Logs -> Microsoft -> Windows -> SPB-ClassExtension. Right click on Analytic and enable it - all events will be logged. Disable it when done, and look for the 1023 events, and view the details tab - they'll give you the full buffer contents. Other events will let you know things like the direction of the transfer, etc."
It's my perception part of Thiel's motivation was to stop Gawker from outing closet homosexuals.

And the freedom of speech you so vigorously protect was to reveal details of a B-List celebrities sexual activities. Where is the moral courage on that?

Yes Freedom of Speech is paramount among our rights, but it's not inviolately absolute. The Gawker guys were scum but that's not why they lost their lawsuit. They lost their lawsuit because a jury felt their actions lacked news value and were a violation of privacy.
Docker way is structuring your apps in "one service per container" — Docker is designed around this. Even the simplest applications require multiple containers (one for front-end, one for back-end, one for the database etc) — even without clustering or high-availability, which complicate things even more.

When you have multiple containers, it is imperative that they are managed as a group, with clearly defined dependencies. This is why Docker requires an orchestration tool. And when the number of your production nodes is greater than one, Docker on its own becomes inadequate for that.