skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Not that I know of. I mostly pieced the process together from disparate sources. Let me try to give you a brain-dump:

First, a point of note: one funny thing is that the VSphere ecosystem assumes, is that the ops people deploying VSphere use Windows. So the tooling around VSphere—even the unofficial community tooling—are Windows programs.

Besides the server computer I was setting up, I only have a MBP (with no Boot Camp partition), so, "step zero": I installed VMWare Fusion, and downloaded a Windows evaluation guest image from Microsoft.

The rest of this assumes you have Windows:

1. Install http://www.v-front.de/p/esxi-customizer-ps.html, and use it to generate an ESXi ISO customized for your machine. (Add network-card and storage drivers, essentially.)

The generated ISO doesn't "burn" onto a USB correctly using regular tools for some reason. The recommended Windows tool is called Rufus. I couldn't use that from a VM without a lot of hassle, but it turns out the ISO is essentially an ISO9660 export of what was a FAT filesystem, including UEFI boot files. So:

2. Extract the ISO onto a FAT-formatted USB stick. Plug it into the new machine, and pick the UEFI file in your BIOS boot manager. The installation proceeds a lot like an ncurses Linux install (e.g. Ubuntu Server.)

3. Once the machine is running, it shows a URL you can reach its web client interface at. For managing the hypervisor, this is mostly fine. (You can also enable SSH from this web console, and then SSH into the hypervisor.) For setting up new VMs, however, I found the [free] VSphere Client (https://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?langu...) a lot more powerful. Install that if you like. Again, though, it's Windows-only.

4. Create a macOS VM in VMWare Fusion. (It assists you in doing this; it just requires that you have a recovery partition on your Mac.)

5. Find the menu option in VMWare Fusion to "Connect to an ESXi server"; specify the IP the server console provides, and the admin user/password you provided during installation.

6. Go to the VM library window, right-click the macOS VM, and one of the options should be "Upload to an ESXi server". You can then pick one of your connected servers.

---

One thing VMWare wants you to do, that you shouldn't do (for a home lab, at least), is to install their Platform Management Controller, "VSphere VCenter." (You might be tempted, because that's the only way to get their modern [horribly-janky] web-app interface that exposes all the VM configuration options like the Windows client does.) The VCenter VM appliance is ridiculously bulky: it takes ~16GB of RAM and two dedicated vCPUs just to run it. It's designed to consume one whole ESXi host node of a VSphere cluster, not to assist in the maintenance of a single-node ESXi setup.
I dislike the idea of using 'origin' for my own remote name.

I keep 'origin' as the canonical remote and my local master branch tracks origin/master. I use people's usernames for their remotes (including for my own).

If I'm pushing a feature branch to my own remote:

git push -u myusername mybranchname

If I need to checkout someone's PR, it's:

git remote add theirusername git@github.com:theirusername/repo.git
git fetch theirusername
git checkout -t theirusername/repo

I've seen people at work who are new to git/Github struggle a lot with the 'origin'/'upstream' differentiation recently, especially when they're learning branching, and they don't seem to have any problems once I switch them over to using 'origin' + usernames.
for ints, just use the 32-bit value

I assume that this should be value modulo m, where m is actual size of the backing array.

for strings, xor the bytes a word at a time.

Well, for strings the same, that is, final output modulo m.
Thank you for the encouraging words!! { ˃̵̑ᴥ˂̵̑}b
What an apropos quote! Never seen that one before, good to know it now.
For me computing peaked in the late 1990s. NT4 and Word Perfect 7, surfing the internet on a 256 Kbps SDSL modem.
How to structure your MobX app for the real world
> discriminating against innocent third parties is going to help

I'm not following you on that, would you explain more.
> this tool should not have dependencies on corporate infrastructure like Google’s (basically any partner in PRISM)

Free yourself from the bonds of corporate infrastructure by installing this tool on your Google Android or Apple iPhone device (Microsoft Windows desktop version coming soon).
When did computing become separate from math and other sciences and why? I always think it's integral to math.
Well, too bad openRC was not chosen when Debian picked an init system. I really wished they would chose openRC instead, but no. It has an /etc/rc.conf just like BSD's rc.subr. Devuan wasn't working the last time I tried to install it, maybe that will change in a while. The prospect of a Debian fork with openRC (even if it's optional) sounds pretty nice.
As you've probably noticed in the other replies here, opinions vary widely :).

These kinds of things are also part of why I switched to OS X in 2003-ish, so I understand the hesitation.

In my experience, Linux is perfectly fine nowadays for these things. I've been traveling a bit recently (and so have been using a lot more random WiFi access points, tethering with my phone, and relying on battery for power), and everything's pretty much just worked for me.

My company's development team is just about 50/50 Linux/Mac now, and I haven't seen any real difference between the two sides with issues for WiFi. In fact, I've probably seen more difficulty on the Mac side recently: I feel like the last few versions of OS X have had the habit of randomly dropping WiFi connections sometimes. One of my friends has an MBP that will drop a connection & refuse to reconnect until restarted (or at least he hasn't yet found a solution that doesn't involve restarting).

It's possible a lot of the issues people report might be down to hardware/distribution choices: not all hardware support is equal, and not all Linux distributions are equal. FWIW I use Arch Linux on a ThinkPad.

That all might sounds a little "works on my machine", but I'm not trying to say that the contrary stories of people having a terrible time aren't valid concerns. What I am saying is that many Linux users have perfectly stable & pleasant experiences, and many Mac/Windows users don't have stable/pleasant experiences, so ultimately YMMV regardless of what setup you choose.
Lumion Pro 7 Crack with License Key 2017 Free Download
It's more general than internet humor.

In general, people in community A talking about disparate community B in the language of community A will find it funny.

For example, programmers at a baseball game talking about baseball in terms of programming, like calling one team emacs and the other vi or one Linux and the other Windows, and then following where it goes.
Of these, 1: Chose the project you want to contribute to (and 1.5: Choose the issue to work on) and 9: Follow up are the hard ones. Both are primarily social problems.

For 1, it's mostly about knowing yourself. What projects interest you, and where can you contribute?

For 9, it's convincing the owners that your contribution is a net positive. Start with 2: Check out how to contribute, and proactively reach out so your pull request doesn't come out of the blue.

Oh, and be willing to put your ego aside -- it can be tough to defend your work, particularly if you're a new (and thus haven't built up trust) contributor. It gets easier, both as the project learns to trust you and as you learn the work within their practices.
Pond: Forward secure, asynchronous messaging for the discerning
> it’s stateless, so you can fully evaluate your position based on the state of the board at a given turn.

That's not always true: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ko_fight
While I'm sure it's well-intended, it does have a couple of fatal flaws.

* Lack of full forward secrecy means logged network logs can be decrypted in the future if an endpoint key is ever compromised.

* e2e encryption is optional, due to legacy SIP support. This is extremely dangerous as it will no doubt lead to false sense of security, with users assuming they're safe just because Ring is the program they're talking through.

Due to these two I cannot actually recommend it to anyone.

Note that Tox got these two right, and is a pretty active project which gets commits semi-daily, regardless of the nonsense about it being dead that some party seems to be spreading.
Encapsulation in object oriented programming is a term we use to describe joining of conceptual topics. A class generally models a conceptual topic, the data and methods on the class allow a clean interface to operations from that topic.

This extends the idea that 'the existence of a public method acts a documentation for what you can do with a object`. The existence of private methods and data are only to the benefit of the developer of the class.

Python's standards for encapsulation are a little different, because you cannot hide methods and data the same way you would with other languages. This is made apparent with public interfaces to private methods like in .__iter__(self): methods.
Sure, most won't right. But clearly in this thread some people are willing to do that and I'm not convinced that there is a large burden/cost to signal to allow this.

The problem for me is that my contact list of Signal users is quite small (1 or 2 people) and everyone else isn't using it. I don't see the reason to allow Signal access to that list of people "Just in case" they decide to. It's incredibly unlikely bordering on near impossible.

This isn't the golden bullet of reasons that it should be this way, but the fact that in design Signal has made the choice to force access to contacts to me, says one of two things.

1. We haven't thought about cases outside of our own experience and expressly reject those as being outside of the market we're interested in. "You're not the user we're looking for."

2. There is value/commoditisation in that contact list that signal is interested in and this is the price to play in their system.

The problem is that either of these two options run pretty counter to the idea of secure privacy focused messaging client designed to be seperate from the user.

People's value of privacy is nuanced enough that making broad scoped decisions like this can run afoul of their expectations. Considering that Signal is aiming itself at the privacy conscious (Over-conscious in a lot of instances I'm sure), it's very weird that they would forgo this obvious affordance of information.
Keeps my consulting going ;-)

In all seriousness I've taught postdocs who were willing to learn everything from Python to C++/MPI to assembler. The key is just to be intellectually curious and enjoy solving problems. R is very often the thin end of the wedge -- its learning curve is more like a wall, but once you've survived that, most programming language quirks seem like NBD. And lord knows the real physical world is far quirkier still.

R is ugly as shit (ok not as bad as Perl, and it is lispy enough not to be infuriating) but it gives you an enormous arsenal of tools. It's not like R is unique in this way, any decent programming language enables this, it's just that R and CRAN seem to have a working implementation of most anything an analyst is likely to need; if you need speed you call out to C++ or FORTRAN, it's not beautiful but it gets things done. So more of your time can be spent in the pursuit of understanding, to poke and prod, visualize your results, solve problems and (sometimes) discover things no one else has seen.

If someone DOESN'T like those last two things, what the hell are they doing in academia anyways? Choose another line of work and make a lot more money :-)
"Otherwise, we’ll be in danger of ending up in an neo-90s Internet, with walled gardens and pay walls all over the place. You already see this trend happening in journalism."

The internet will never be less walled, more free, and more federated than it was in the 90's. With such a poor understanding of the internet and its history, even if he did make a compelling argument (he doesn't), it'd be hard to take seriously.
College graduate is a broad classification. There are graduates who would be a huge benefit to any country but there are some who would not be.
It is very clear before they get to UK there is not a right to stay past graduation.
If you'd like to avoid switching to the browser in your development workflow, I recommend checking out Git-Repo [0] that was posted to HN a little while ago [1].

Git-Repo basically tries to put as many steps of the contribution workflow in terminal as possible, by using the API of the git hosting services. It currently supports GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket.

[0]: https://github.com/guyzmo/git-repo

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12677870
Nothing is stopping anyone from running their own servers, changing the username scheme, and implementing the voice signaling. Moxie doesn't complain about such usage. But that's more work than simply complaining and telling OWS what they should do.

As far as usernames go, that would require the signaling key to be remembered by the user. That doesn't work well in practice. As far as contact sync goes, has anyone submitted a patch for the android client to add an advanced option to disable that? On IOS access to the address book is user controlled at runtime. destinations will be validated by the server at compose time. Regarding federation, let's see some code. It's ridiculous to demand the small team that is OWS solve every single problem.
what matters in the end is being right. When opnions have to turn into action, knowing what is the right thing to do (knowing what technology to use, for example), and a careful balance of tradeoffs is always the sign of good leadership. This may include taking very strong stands on various things.

I've found people have tendencies to delude themselves in certain ways, however. Either being too positive or negative. The former is less harmful than the latter, but both are miscalibrations of judgement.
hmm, horses for courses. I thought popular thinking had moved on from the perl philosophy of "there's more than one way to do it" to "let's reduce complexity and errors by just having one way to do it". While having a CLI and GUI might be good for two different UIs what's the point of having two ways to do the same thing?

The windows X is more of a backwards compatibility thing I imagine, because it makes no sense to have an invisible menu in the top left corner.
Don't listen to the haters. This is extremely valuable. Especially in E-commerce.

Like when you have an ever expanding product line and new categories are being added all the time. Ever wondered why Amazon uses web views all over ?

Many E-commerce companies would love to be able to do extensive A/B testing or add analytics on the fly but are crippled by the App store and the limitations of native apps. Some have even built versions of this themselves.

What we need is an Android port of this and then this will be some hot shit. I am willing to help on the iOS side in any way I can.
A Quick Fix for SQL Server Error 15023
I use it in interviews. That is about it.
Fascinating, TIL–thanks!
And it doesn't have to be - the side effects are to be weighted against the benefits.
I use github for cover letters and have branches for tailored companies, with the company name as the branch name.

I have only one acting copy of my resume. I do not change it per company.
How+to+Crimp+a+RJ45+Networking+Cable
Sadly it is no marketing shit. There is quite an uproar amongst backers, because Indigogo can't refund them... I'm not sayin' people aren't retarded, it was pretty clear that this BioRing stuff can't work. It was totally science-fiction.
Not at all! Just expressing that we keep showing off reinventions of the wheel.
Will the drivers be paid less?

I was under the impression that the prices are already quite aggressive.
Meanwhile it enjoys real multi-core, and has much better IDE support, access to 3D accelerated GUIs and high quality DB drivers and proper Windows supports.
We replaced our old CRM (Peoplesoft) with Salesforce.com. Management did some surveys of users about how they liked it, the average score went from 2 (terrible) to 4 (good).

Some of this was because our Peoplesoft was slow, buggy and downright painful to use.
As pointed out, there are a few 'low cost' options; biochar, plants, algae, etc but they are still extremely expensive since the opportunity cost is essentially 0.

The ability to fix nitrogen from the air and convert it into liquid or solid form on an industrial scale was one of the most important breakthroughs in human history. We can do the same with CO2 but it's cheaper to dig it out if the ground and there is a lot less of it in the air. N makes up 78% of air by volume. CO2 is only 0.04%. You need to handle a lot more air to get the equivalent amount of carbon as you do nitrogen.
Hi, author here. Yes, my point with that sentence was that the average (non-technical) user (to which Signal is marketed btw), is not going to check signatures. Google has root on the phone, the user is using their app store to install the Signal app that comes up in the store, and basically Google has full control over this, and the user would be none the wiser.

Of course, us more technical inclined people could then check the signature, or compare the apk with one built from the official sources, to see the difference and complain about it.

But between those things is a time frame where this is possible.
That's a good point, i didn't think of that! Do we know how fast the tetraneutrons were moving in this experiment? If so, we can work out the degree of time dilation, and how far it would have got.
I think the concern here is that the maintainer could subsequently merge a malicious PR knowing who was using the library from GitHub. That wouldn't be an issue if that group was hosting a version themselves (before the maintainer might find out who was using it).
It can compile to native via NGEN and Mono, for .NET Native it is WIP.
Weblogic was bad in 2007. It's a crime against humanity now.
And it is just this 5-6 year groups that has been studied here -- nothing about older children.
A Java Queue interface implementation that stores directly to SqliteDb
I've read The Washington Post articles carefully multiple times and they never say the rapes didn't happen. They say things like "Key elements of Rolling Stone’s U-Va. gang rape allegations in doubt". They point out inconsistencies in her story. But they never come to the conclusion you did: that there was no rape and the story was entirely fabricated.

In fact the editor says the opposite:

“We told her we wouldn’t name her, in large part because we thought she was a sex-assault victim at that time and we don’t name victims of sexual assault without their permission,” said Mike Semel, The Post’s Metro editor. “That agreement for anonymity needs to be considered until we are absolutely certain that there was no assault at all.”

In the OP for this thread, the WaPo only says "aspects of Jackie’s account were not true". I have yet to see a single piece of evidence presented by anyone that no rape occurred.

As for the jury verdict this week, they only ruled that Rolling Stone knowingly omitted facts that would've painted the administration in a better light. They did not rule on the facts of the rape at all.

You are doing the same thing the Rolling Stone writers did: presenting something as fact when the evidence is contradictory.
Exactly, one of the problems of democracy is that it can make the wrong decision. And there's no accountability.
You don't need application servers. They just being bloat. Their ship has sailed.
Thank you! Please follow the project and join the Slack channel if you can :)
No, I'm actually pretty sure assangedom comes as a package, you don't get to cherry-pick whom you oppose.
I use and love Tox as it got some key fundamentals right.

First, they have full forward secrecy. This is notably unlike Ring, which does not.

Secondly, all communications are end to end encrypted and endpoint-verified, as there's no "legacy SIP support" (eg: SIP) or such nonsense and the DHT addresses your contacts gave you are actual ec25519 public keys.
What different serialization format? I thought serialization == string.
CSIS has been intercepting domestic traffic (full packet, at their discretion) without needing any kind of warrant since before 9/11.
> In essence it's where rather than a capitalist system of a small minority directing the production based off the market

False premise. This is simply not true in any way, shape, or form. The bottom 90% of people have drastically more control over production than the top 10%. That's why the single richest company in the world, Apple, is a consumer products company.

> it's the workers directing the production

There's a very obvious conflict of interest there, because the workers aren't the only ones who have things that need to be produced. "You know, Ivan, making bread is really tedious; let's go back to making AK-47s instead." This is why if you go on Ebay and type "soviet surplus", you can still buy crates of Mosin Nagants and Nixie Tubes to this very day.

Planned economies are terrible at producing what needs to be produced, and excellent at overproducing things that don't. Whether you think market economies are impersonal or not, they are undoubtedly extremely efficient at meeting people's needs; no more, no less. Deviating from optimum production levels costs companies money.
IQ has always been a difficult thing for me. I was born into a 3-sigma family to 4-sigma parents. And, on average, we all have lived below average lives.

My parents can barely manage their lives, and I'm the only child (of 4) who was able to finish college. So, I always find the fascination with IQ to be odd.

At 3rd grade, my siblings and I were separated from the rest of the kids and given the gifted label. (Someone once explained that 'gifted' was a cold war program to beat the soviets - idk). We were then given special treatment: small classes, lots of logic puzzles, access to technology and science, lots of field trips etc.

By the end of high school, approximately 25% of my class had already dropped out. But, for some odd reason (probably because obedience - i.e. 'conscientiousness') I succeeded.

Over all of those years, I came to realize that there were kids with high IQ who were smart but even more who were very stupid. Even of the smart ones, many of them seemed to completely lack creativity, intuition, or lateral thinking. And, many were also stricken with major behavioral and learning disabilities.

I realize that there are correlations with IQ to 'success'. But, the IQ club, for me, was really a circle jerk. And, I don't believe that they're somehow more re 'fit'. So, this analysis seems spot on.

Edit: oops, if I had actually read the link, instead of just the headline, I would have seen that it's not 'spot on'. Sorry :-)