skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes, just like every other Western European country with a left-wing government worries over it, i.e. not one bit.
Does it still have the mini-toslink optical fiber connection inside the headphone jack? They've had these since 2005. Could be a reason to keep the headphone port.
Hi HN,

I'm one of the engineers working on the project, if you have any questions please ask.
In a twisted sort of way, a person could destroy trust that paying the ransom will actually get your data back. Someone could create ransomware that will never decrypt, even after the ransom is paid. Once the victims know the dishonest ransomware is out there, that may ruin the revenue towards the "honest" ransomware.
> An exception is a goto

Not quite.

> Your conclusion doesn't follow from your premise.

What conclusion?

-----

The difference between a coroutine and a subroutine is that the subroutine cannot select the destination of a return statement: control always "returns" to the caller. Coroutines can choose where the control flow goes after they run. This is exactly what GOTO statements permit.

There is no formal difference between allowing coroutines and allowing goto statements.

(And we all know what goto is considered, don't we?)

Exceptions are not the same: the control is passed to a handler but the raiser/thrower (in general) does not choose the catcher.
Right click the [web] link at the top of the HN page for this submission, and open it in an incognito window. Click the first result in Google.
I wish all websites used links. I'm totally fine with my click event being captured and handled client-side, but please use <a> element with working href, so that I can cmd+click into new tab, copy-paste to friend, etc. Please do not broke the fundamentals of the web for sake of single page apps – you can eat the cake and have the cake!
Arsenal's successes at the turn of the decade were based around a more counter-attacking style than they've employed since the stadium move.

Looks like this season they have taken a leaf out of Leicester's book and gone for the pacy trident of Iwobi, Sanchez and Walcott to launch counters with.
I can tell you that in Europe it surely doesn't look like that.

Companies like Salesforce, Amazon, Google or Facebook and similar are the snowflakes of Fortune 100.

There are plenty of other companies out there, and for the large majority software development is a by product, not their main business.
Closest thing to an off the shelf Linux MBP: https://puri.sm/
https://www.rt.com/news/364768-iceland-pm-resigns-pirates/
This recent round of updates made me consider what I need from a "work" machine. For me, it comes down to three items:

* Can I code on this machine? This means at minimum three tasks: write, deploy and test code. This also connotes a lot of things, including but not limited to access to a non-unobfucated file system.

* Can I view all file formats easily and successfully? This includes formats like XML and json which are not typically meant to be viewed by a human.

* Can I use and move freely between several web browsers? This also connotes a lot of things, including but not limited to access to browser extensions, console, etc.

The answer to all these questions is "Yes" for Mac/Win/Linux and solidly "No" for iOS. Which, is too bad, because I'd love to use something like an iPad Pro for work. But Apple has placed several software based restrictions on iOS which, above and beyond other hardware restrictions (lack of multiple monitors, poor selection of input devices) add up to there being no reasonable way to get "work" done on the platform.

I don't see myself as a power user, either: Apple seems completely stuck in a time where all users needed was access to a decent office suite and the ability to email and print in order to "do work".

That's not an adequate description of "work" any more, but apparently no one has told Apple.
FBI to scour 650k emails on Weiner's laptop; 1000s may be tied to Clinton server
Bill Gates' "passion" was essentially "Dad isn't leaving me his money. I have to make my own."
I've been using it for the last 2/3 years. Started using it because my computer was old, and it was a lot faster than Ubuntu, and much more polished (in my opinion) than XFCE or LFCE, and have used it ever since. Has worked really well. Definitely has one or two persistent bugs, though. There was a really annoying cursor one for a long time, and then one with window focus which Ubuntu also suffered from. It's also annoying not to be able to do updates in place. To be fair, I think they are often upstream issues, Ubuntu also was waiting for that upstream focus fix for a long time. But it does mean they're not yet fulfilling the promise of a completely seamless, polished, Linux distribution.

For the moment, for my use case it's the best distribution, but it's not quite at the stage where I'd want to put it on a relative's computer, and I think given their stated aims that's the litmus test.
> the problem is that time of possession is a decent proxy for better team

Decent, but by no means perfect. In Atletico's La Liga winning season of 2013-2014, they enjoyed exactly 50% possession. The following year they actually had 45%, despite finishing 3rd. Leicester City won the league with 46% possession.

The problem is not just the presentation of statistics, it's the assumption that if you do the same things title winning teams do, you will enjoy the same success. It may well have been that hoofing down the field worked for some teams (it did for Leicester), but that is no guarantee of success if you don't happen to have a fast center forward and a holding midfielder who runs like crazy. On the other hand, Spain won Euro 2012 without a proper center forward (Torres won the golden boot with only 3 goals, but don't let that fool you, Spain's goals were widely spread out and Torres scored one in the final long after the game was won) by playing possession football.
I don't think "easy" is the way to describe that endeavour. Ever tried a hackintosh?
Maybe your employer can purchase the appropriate cable for you, so you aren't burdened with another dongle.

http://www.apple.com/shop/product/MK0X2AM/A/usb-c-to-lightni...
You are right... In my defense, it is not only "funner" to say the same thing differently, but sometimes drives the point home "more better."
I still use a Makefile for R markdown, but that's largely because I don't use only R for any analysis. There's normally some amount of calculation or pre-processing that happens before I flip into R. Makefiles are particularly good at describing the relationships between datafiles when you mix different tools.
I explained very clearly why the circumstances surrounding the expeditions pushed the Europeans to be more greedy than their Chinese counterparts. The fact is that the Europeans pillaged the New World and the Chinese didn't. I believe mainly economic considerations led this to be the case. I don't know what your explanation is.
> especially in a city, which usually have hundreds or thousands of them (Manhattan alone has eleven, for example)

That's really quite a way from "hundreds or thousands".
LSD and Quantum Measurements: Can you see Schrödinger’s cat on acid?
That's just hilariously twisted.
Romans, like most societies, were very protective of their social order, and ignored or suppressed most inventions that might threaten it.
Not arguing, just curious. What type of work are you in?
Онлайн работа можно зарабатывать 100$ в дин
Unfortunately software can not remedy an essentially hardware issue no matter the laws and tax/vat requirements for purchase.

> In this case technology makes law pointless

Spanish keyboards usually have 1 extra key so they are typically 105 keys; in Japan they are 109 keys. From my experiences in Spain, if you are buying as a company (even if you purchase it at Carrefour or El Corte Inglais) you will pay a small premium for those non-local keyboards.
> But your individual case isn't going to affect their behavior.

It isn't going to affect them much. But as anybody who runs a business knows, the difference between loss and profit generally hinges on a number of sensitive factors. Note, for example, that drug dealing pays so poorly that many drug dealers live with their moms:

http://articles.latimes.com/2005/apr/24/opinion/oe-dubner24

Refusing to pay on your own doesn't help other people much, but it still helps.
That rumor is silly nonsense. The Navy continues to operate small vessels, and commanding one doesn't impact promotability (unless the skipper runs his boat aground or something). The Sea Shadow was always intended as a one-off experiment. Some of the technology was successfully used in later designs for larger ships. Lockheed has been a major Navy defense contractor for decades.
I used A/UX. For real, because at the time we had VAXen and Suns, and it was a good way to make use of the 68030 Macs we had (I think it never ran on the IIfx, which had a 68040)

I have no delusions about Apple culture. But apparently you're forgetting that Apple heavily marketed OSX's association with UNIX after the merge with NeXT, and that it made a lot of noise about how the Mac would be the best UNIX workstation ever.

I lived through those years and saw the same presentations you mentioned - some on VHS tapes that were shipped to us after the events. There was no toying about OSX as a workstation, it was even on the sales pitch guides.
This comment contains a policy suggestion. I want it to become law in the United States and elsewhere.

I can't quite use the word "literally" but I almost can so I'll do so anyway: if you pay a ransom, you are literally paying for your party to attack someone else. And you are actually literally (not metaphorically) funding their next attack.

Paying a ransom should be a criminal act that is twenty times worse than asking for one. It should be illegal for the exact same reason that possession of stolen goods is illegal.

On a microeconomic level it might make sense for you personally to buy stolen goods off the street: the existence of the laws making you a criminal if you do no longer makes this true.
Presenting at Grace Hopper 2016
The thing about Python is that unlike most other languages, you don't have to deal with that complexity. You can still write Python 2.7 style code, no problem.

This approach to async, though, is just a language feature that's becoming mainstream right now. C# has it, ES7 has it, C++ has a working paper on it etc. Python actually had the benefit of watching how things work out elsewhere before implementing it all.
That's a good point: typing [1] may be fine background noise for some; speaker-phone conversations, giggles, farts, and expletives for others. Being conscientious by considering and adjusting one's volume level when typing, speaking, farting, or swearing will help us survive our open-plan dark age as we await the facility-clerics' re-discovery of ancient door and wall technologies.

[1] https://soundcloud.com/shanemcretro/ibm-model-m-five
Nope, you're right. I've conflated the two.
I remember that section from decades ago, mostly because of Feynman writing:
“When you take a lump of sugar and crush it with a pair of pliers in the dark, you can see a bluish flash. Some other crystals do that too. Nobody knows why. The phenomenon is called "triboluminescence.'".

Reading that, I thought "could it be lasing?". A laser is two parallel mirrors around a medium with electrons in an excited state.
Squeezing a crystal will produce electrical energy by piezoelectricity. Crushing a crystal will produce parallel planes, at least momentarily. So the preconditions for lasing exist.

This is still an open question today. Lasing of crystals under pressure may have been observed in some exotic materials.[1] But it doesn't seem to be the main light-emission mechanism in triboluminescence.

[1] http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApPhL..81..460R
TouchBar killed the tactile ESC key. People using vim or BootCamp and/or Linux, Windows, VMware, or Photoshop are in for a more difficult ride. So instead of having access to ESC/Func keys, we can type emoji or use Apple Pay.

The hardware on all Macs are updated on a very infrequent basis as mentioned in the article. GPUs sold with machines today are often the same as ones sold years ago.

Apple killed their external monitor option.
"Only"? You need locks in exactly the same scenarios as you do when you use multiple threads.
Virtual method dispatch is also a goto (worse yet, it's a computed goto!).
That's a convincing argument.
American Dream
Any plans on releasing a version that is not tied to the apple ecosystem? ("super/windows" vs "option", "command" vs "alt") Why are those not configurable, as well?

Are "fn" and "control" swappable?
It did, it just took a hundred years to kick off, by all reasonable comparisons, China is in the middle of its part of the industrial revolution and there are signs that its about to slide out of it into the next phase of development.

If you consider that the "real" Industrial Revolution took about 60-80 years to run through in the West, and the West was starting pretty much from scratch, and if we pick a date of some sort, say 1976 (end of the Cultural Revolution), China has been at it for about 40 years. In 20 years (about the same length of time as the West's) it looks like huge parts of China will have been elevated to standards of living that probably exceeded those in the West when we came out of our own Industrial Revolution and will be entering into the next major developmental stage.

If anything a better and more interesting argument is how China was able to reproduce the Industrial Revolution in modern times as a model for economic growth.
Hi,

What kind of key mechanism do you use? It looks more like a apple keyboard than other keyboards, will it have the same very short travel?
> And we all know what goto is considered, don't we?

A very powerful and occasionally useful tool that's often misused, and misunderstood because of the aforementioned misuse?
As far as I can see the files that were originally under MIT still have their original copyright statements intact, as comments above illustrate. Which files are you alleging have had their credits removed from?
I love them both as well. Edit: read the prequel first, imo.
Microsoft, I'm sure, also threw a lot of R&D money at things. I just think the money under Jobs's Apple was directed more wisely.
Distribute your critical piece of infrastructure, blacklist IP addresses, etc.
I would argue that a 'lead' would work with the juniors and need to code to help them whereas a 'manager' would not need to code.

The role name may vary between company, but I believe we can agree that there are different roles to fill.
I think we will see Apple runing macOS on their own ARM chips long before we see them opening up for whitebox installs.
I have a sprinkler system with similar qualities.
I don't know Calculate Linux, but this indicates that they use the git://-protocol:
http://www.calculate-linux.ru/blogs/en/320/show

That is just as insecure as rsync. You need to use https in order to protect data. (Appart from that it seems calculate linux doesn't even have a webpage over https...)
I think that it's true that you have to be passionate about what you do. You have to trick yourself into feeling passion for something lucrative that probably wouldn't interest you if you had a trust fund. You can turn anything into a game, and when the reward is cold, hard cash it can become pretty engaging. Just my perspective.
Cranes
The Sims Social: a love letter from a computer virus (2011)
The coroutine can only choose to jump into a routine designed for that purpose, not an arbitrary line of code. It's almost a goto in a similar way to exceptions being almost a goto.
Effect segregation (a more appropriate term than “purity”) is a matter of using types, and has nothing to do with functional vs. OOP.
Now I need a decent terminal (iTerm2-like quality) and a sane set of shortcuts (like a shortcut for "Copy" that doesn't stop processes in terminal) and I'd be all set...
Here is one thing we get very wrong. Programming is a communication tool to describe communication systems. If you were to design a tool to design/build communication systems, it wouldn't look like what we program with.
They were so protective of their social order that they kept killing each others...
I suggest reading Adam Smiths wealth of nations from 1760s. It is rather ironic that such an old book actually describes these things very well. Adam Smith accurately predicted that South American would develop poorly compared to North America.

What is good about Smith's description is that he includes the factors mentioned here as well as a number of others which together give a very good explanation for why the industrial revolution had to happen in Europe and England in particular.

1) As mentioned the fragmentation of Europe gave competition of ideas, and avoided the intellectual stagnation of the great arab and eastern empires.

2) Coast line and river relative to landmass is crucial. You thin land e.g. given more relative coastline than circular. Hence America, Africa and China are poor fits. You also want many rivers criss crossing and not just a few going one direction. WHY? Because before railroads, transport by water will be crucial. Massive amounts of specialization is needed for industrialization. That requires being able to ship products out to as many people as possible cheaply. You can only achieve that with lots of easily available water transport combined with high population density. There is no country fitting that description that Britain in the 1700s. No country had as high population density and high density of rivers and coastline relative to landmass as them.

In fact the country starting a sort of earlier industrial revolution was the Netherlands which had a similar advantage. Due to being under the sea level, digging canals was very easy. So they could dig a lot of them and transport goods cheaply. The Netherlands had nothing else of important resources, they just had high population density combined with an extensive canal network. That made the Netherlands the richest country in the world per capita in the 1600s.

3) Institutions. Adam Smith compares these extensively between the North and South of America. The Portuguese and Spanish possessions had very unfavorable institutions and social structures for economic development. Unlike North America they let a few elites take all the land. It ended up like a sort of feudal system were people worked at the local castle and village for their "lord". In contrast North America was divided into lots of small patches of land with competing farmers selling their products in a free market. North America inherited British rule of law, rather than rule of men, so businessmen in North America could feel safe lending money or investing in ventures with more powerful individuals. In the south you could never know if you'd get your money back from some well connected individual, because written laws mattered little, but connections was everything.

In short I think the receipt for industrialization is many small competing states, lots of rivers and coastline with dense population combined with strong institutions. By strong institutions one might instead say that rule of law is observed combined with some form of democratic or power sharing traditions.
yes, thank you!
Read something about Spanish Inquisition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Legend_of_the_Spanish_In...
I bought a 2015 MBP back in January, so I'm all set for a few years at least. Whether OSX goes down the pan even more, I don't know.

Moving to Linux seems like a romantic idea, but I can forsee there being a number of problems that would make it unfeasible for me

1. I use 1Password, no Linux client

2. Spotify client is no longer being developed for Linux

3. YouNeedABudget software is not Linux compatible - I have 2+ years of financial transactions in there...

4. Google Drive, no (official) Linux client

5. I have a number of Alfred workflows, and enjoy using Alfred in general.

Yes, there are a number of open source alternatives, but I've built up enough inertia on OSX it's going to be very difficult for me to switch.

There are things about OSX that couldn't care less about like iTunes, Apple Maps etc, but overall it's not so bad
Do you want to invest your time worrying about types or actually programming? My issue with building these type-theoretic monstrosities is that now you suddenly have to tackle two problems instead of just one.

Just like the underlying machine code is hidden in modern languages, types should be totally abstracted away when programming in a high level language.
So? Observing from the outside would require local observations, which increasingly is tracked (ALPR, CCTV). With a network attack the knowledge can be gained (in bulk!) with a lot less risk. Monitoring many lights (even those not visible from the street) in hundreds of houses without the risk of creating a local data trail is very different than driving by a few houses and observing for yourself.

However, that's just one way an insecure device could be abused that uses the data we know is available. I'm sure there are subtle and clever ways to abuse these devices that are still unknown.
Agreed on all counts, though if you are coding, reading XML and JSON, and switching between multiple web browsers, you are the creme de le creme "power user", no?
It was so unexpected. I was talking with her on the phone just last Monday about how my interview had gone. I'm away at school most of the year so I haven't been here much. It's hard being home and seeing all these things about my mom. She had pictures of my brother and I hung everywhere, she cared so much about everyone.

I'm sorry to hear about your loss. I'm going to try to be closer to the rest of my family. Thank you for talking.
Thank you! I'll search through the subreddit, but I'm hesitant to cross-post as I don't have a reddit account any more.

With regard to locomotion, that's an interesting variable. I should have described his relevant accessibility issues. The only relevant problems are corrective lenses and some limitation with locomotion, but far less than his age would suggest. He can walk, move, bend, and lift everyday objects without a problem, but athletic or rapid movements are out.
This is probably the #1 reason why I still want to use mac OS every day. Emacs-style editing shortcuts and not having to press Ctrl-Shift-C to copy when I'm in my terminal window (alternatively, not having to remember to press Ctrl-Shift-C to copy but only when I'm in my terminal window).
The industrial revolution did happen in Japan though... and without any of the key factors explained in the article.
Good point. I should have said that asyncio allows patterns that use fewer shared resources.

Actually... I take that back. Asyncio is solving a different problem than the locking of shared resources.
Yes, I believe as well there should be an assessible solution and that should be the standard. However in this case there is none, since weirdly enough git is sitting on the throne. You can try to establish other tools like mercurial in some projects, but you may end up getting harsh resistance by exactly the people you try to serve with that option.