skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Really? I'm quite shocked... Oh. Wait, it's because I keep confusing you with lispm. He would find plan9 lacking, you wouldn't. This makes sense.

bangs head on wall

ACME was cool. It's not quite enough to make me switch from emacs, especially stripped from the plan 9 environment, but it's enough to make me drool with envy, especially over the structured regexes and powerful piping tools.

Well, I know what my summer Elisp project is.

>only thing I mostly disagree with him are some of the design decisions regarding Go.

Frankly, I'm not shocked. Nobody I know that has similar opinions to you likes Go, and I can understand why.

As a Schemer, I can respect minimalism in design: The question is whether Go chose the right ideas to implement/not implement. The jury is still out, but it seems to be leaning toward no.
isnt DRF built into rails basically (never used rails)
Using big external libraries in Firefox add-ons used to be totally prohibited. Jquery used to be prohibited outright. It's an undesirable practice. Add-ons operate at a higher privilege level than web pages. The low-quality webcrap that can be tolerated on a web page has no place in a privileged add-on.
Unless that's a self-driving clown car, it's not a substitute -- it can't have the person density or be protected from having to yield to other traffic like a subway can.
I assume you mean what works for what problem. I think the problem is these are moving so fast that what didn't work yesterday has been coerced into being the best option for, say, image classification today.

Hell, ANN itself was widely the last choice for ML problems until a couple of years back and now it seems like the first choice go-to.
We were easily paying $100/month for AT&T's "family plan." This was about 8 years ago.

We then switched to T-Mobile's pre-paid plans, which start at $40/month. That's for 3 GB of data. If you want 5 GB, it's $50/month, which comes to $600/year.
How much of SF nimby psychology comes from the over leverage this city forces on you? Even with 200k down and a 200k salary an $800k mortgage can turn you fairly conservative I think.
There is a point in life when like it or not, switching roles with our parents is the right thing to do. The hardest part is accepting that this is necessary.
> but instinct tells me they're not up to the task of all-condition driving
From a sensor perspective, what does a human have that are missing in the new Tesla suite?

The sensors cover the whole spectrum of light humans can see, plus a lot more. There is also ultrasonic sonar.

And, of course, all of this is 360 degrees.
That's the issue. People see straight through it when you require an actual passport, so they're trying to turn a driver's license into an internal passport and hope nobody connects the dots.
An alternate medium style guide
Why would we expect a subset of supernovae to have exactly the same peak luminosity no matter where they are and what stars they occur in? Instrument artifact, or previously-unknown outcome of the physical laws of the universe?
I have a question about http://www.django-rest-framework.org/tutorial/2-requests-and...

Is it a good practice to handle all verbs in the function dealing with the particular request as shown in the example?

I think for a real world scenario that would be a mess to read, but for a less experienced developer this could hint that such approach is alright and result in a less readable code base in the future.
Most people don't make clothes. Most people buy clothes that other people make. Therefore, most people don't care that the clothes other people make are (random style out of a hat...) "punk".

I don't think this logic adds up. People care what the house they buy looks like, and some people even care what their house's appearance projects as an expression of their own taste.
> This. I've recently been working with a large project using Node. I find myself constantly thinking about how I'd build it if I were using DRF.

You wouldn't need to think about promises or callbacks at first place, which would make things way easier. That's the main reason I gave up NodeJS for Go when working with APIs. Async programming is noise. CSP is a better paradigm.
Note that in the context of a browser extension an "XSS vulnerability" means "a web page just got to run code with the extension's privileges"....

[Disclaimer: I work for Mozilla.]
And yet no gun camera footage or even pictures...

Funny that...
Is this bad since it can't execute a simple command without a library? Or is it good since the error message was so descriptive?

If the consensus is "bad": I imagine at some point elm made the decision to make things highly modular (something which people usually like) and lazy (another thing people generally like), so why are those things a problem in this case?

Update: Mostly what I'm observing here is that the tweet basically implies that the author(s) of elm should be ashamed of themselves for designing (free) software that is so obviously wrong. Publicly shaming projects like this is dumb. I'm not convinced it's ever accomplished anything other than kicking off big flame wars. He should open or contribute to an issue ticket for the elm project. Otherwise, he should just stop using the software if he doesn't like it.
Analysis of online fraud in the U.S
I'm not sure if this is the same case, but I assume it is: if you're wondering why the researcher doesn't want to share the vuln listen to this talk:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U4e0Remq1WQ

Roughly at 41:30 he explains why he doesn't want to disclose the vuln. The tl;dr is he thinks the sandbox is broken beyond repair and whatever fix they come up he can create another bypass for the sandbox. But he doesn't want to do this all the time and he needs his vuln as a poc to show to customers if they abuse the sandbox.
curious on the naming, because it means "book" in my language, is this intentional?
Why we raised our SaaS prices
I am a longtime amateur player, and a youth club coach of about 15 years, having assistant coached a US National Youth Futsal champion team. (I also played pickup after work with PG in Cambridge Back In The Day - I wonder if he still plays?) I would be cautious, however, in generalizing the article's first major point (the game as a simulation) from elite players to garden-variety players. Elite players must, of necessity, maintain and adhere to a perhaps game-specific strategy during the organized chaos of a match. I find, as a coach (vs player), without the distraction of a tired body, tired mind, and somebody trying to kick me, that it is much easier to keep this strategy at the forefront of my mind. My skills are also not so good that they require little conscious thought. So I think an elite player (as I am not) may, in fact, benefit by acting as a coach in these games. The second major point is about data influencing the real game. This is undoubtedly true. Soccer is a very mathematical, probabilistic game at heart, and there are many readily available resources for the technically inclined soccer enthusiast. I would recommen

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-numbers-game-chris-ander...

to start. I also have a small number of articles I found interesting on my G+ soccer page

https://plus.google.com/u/0/101713908985994656356
Kodak Ektra
The point about Ms. Richards' posts is that, even she who thinks dick jokes at work are a fireable offense, has made them "at home." You and she are both right (perhaps to different degrees, in my mind) that doing it at the water cooler or a professional conference are inappropriate. Unlike you though, she seems to feel that doing it "at home" (or on her personal Twitter) is OK. You seem to think it would be perfectly acceptable if one day enough people get huffy about that post and she gets fired or otherwise extralegally punished because of it.

We shouldn't conflate government vs. personal liberal behavior. No, the government shouldn't force companies to hire/retain people who have offensive political opinions. But yes, the public and the people in the companies should be more liberal and tolerant of employees who made offensive political statements 3 years ago, in a non-professional context. The only reason it could have any sort of effect on his ability to do that job, is because people might be determined to punish him and would apply leverage like the threat of boycotts against Twitter. Which, yeah, is their right, but does it really solve anything?

I agree her tweets and this ex-Twitter guy's are different in offense-levels, but when you're satisfying the online mobs or PR advisors, our individual opinions don't matter much.

> As if this would be the straw that breaks the camels back and gets people SO riled up over the inequities in our society is laughable. Poor high tech worker! So oppressed.

The same process that would dig up years-old political posts made by privileged white guys, will dig up the evidence of a secret sexual orientation or gender identity, class/ethnic differences, religion, etc. Your "awful history of mistreating one group or another" will continue as long as we tolerate and encourage this sort of prying into people's lives and punishing them for what we found. No "group" can be mistreated if we collectively refused to allow the would-be bullies to categorize people, right?

It shouldn't matter how sympathetic or not we are with today's victim, or whether the type of persecution they're receiving is less severe than what happened in the past. We should always be striving for more equality and less persecution of any kind, right?
Failure to understand the relativity of value is perhaps the primary logical fallacy I see every day. There was an article on this site recently about someone doing their part to "promote equality" by helping someone receive an "elite education" (who otherwise couldn't have had one). Yet isn't the concept of an elite education - by definition - something that can only exist when some people are denied the opportunity to have one?

In reality, patting oneself on the back for helping one person to succeed is exactly equivalent to hoping another person fails. The human instinct for hierarchy is deep and generally unacknowledged.
It's that fine line between "nobody really knows what they're doing" versus "doing anything is almost certainly better than doing nothing."
Well, prostitution is physically sexual. So it's more like someone who gets addicted to camgirls. However those situations are mutually honest transactions. In this case she's being deceived and lacks the strength of character or mental stability to fully realize that or cope with it. I do agree that she's probably starved for affection.

Frankly, an escort or camgirl habit could be cheaper.
You've said this in two places on this submission, but I challenge you on the claim that "99% of the population" doesn't care what their house looks like.

I think a lot of people do care.
Strongly disagree. DRF can be used in a model centric way, has much easier to read source and drastically better documentation. The community is much more developed as well.
Hah, true...
Shouldn't the expression be more like

P(probes) = 1 - P(no probes)
= 1 - (1 - (P(civ launches one probe)*P(probe reaches Earth)))**Nciv

You can then simply argue that P(probe reaches Earth) is small, because you don't believe that Bracewell-von Neumann probes are effective.
It's a bit more than opinion, it's the Cosmological Principle:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmological_principle

There's room for debate but it generally seems to match our observations. There's no a priori reason to believe that Earth is special in the universe since all the rest of our solar system / galaxy seem to be unremarkable.
NOAA takes 'huge step' forward in predicting solar storm impacts on Earth
this sounds about right. I advice to open a trust fund so changing hands is just question of setting up a new president
I guess extension's privileges means more privileges than a regular web page has (accessing file system for example?), if so then it's even more dramatic.
Bodyport (YC S15) is hiring a senior back-end engineer
I haven’t paid much attention to LibreSSL since the project started but I recently downloaded the source code for OpenSSH and was very impressed with how clean and readable the code for ssh-keygen is. After seeing that, I’d have a more confidence in the OpenBSD team; they already have a great reputation for security but looking at their actual output impressed me more. (Maybe, some day I’ll explore free Unix-like operating systems other than GNU/Linux.)
It's after my son's nickname. In my language it doesn't mean anything in particular.
I didn't pay for his React series, but the free Redux series - while useful - I felt wouldn't have been worth paying for. Then again, I already knew React/Flux, so perhaps I wasn't really his target audience.
https://www.datingring.com/pricing

comes close. Supposed to be very good service and were featured on the Startup Podcast. It feels similar to TrunkClub but instead of outsourcing shopping for clothes one can outsource swiping right or looking at online profiles.
Agreed and this is why React has been given a pass I think, because it's only for display purposes.
I'm afraid I don't see your point. You asked:

> how do you believe someone loves you and is going to marry you without seeing them?

How does one believe that? Well, they choose to. It might very well be irrational, it might be outlandish, yet they still choose to believe it.
People choose to believe all sorts of outlandish things all the time. Sometimes they were right after all, sometimes not. Given that this instance perfectly fits established patterns of scams I think it's a perfectly fair assumption that this is a scam until proven otherwise.
I agree, I find doing this with DRF very easy and had the opposite with TastyPie doing stuff I did not want or need. Having some ORM integration is nice; there are a number of situations where it's easy to use your ORM safely and get stuff done very quickly (eg. basic CRUD stuff for instance)
I think access to source code is a key enabler. Even if it was limited in some ways, that would be a good start.

Imagine if Consumer Reports could access the code and do a code review when testing a car. We know from lawsuits that Toyota software is absolutely horrible, for instance. I'd think that insurance companies and consumers would benefit from knowing that up front.

Or imagine if repair shops could get certified for access to the software to modify it. Mod shops already do this on the sly--they're just hoping to fly under the law. Maybe they have to carry a bond, like home contractors.

On an Android device or Chromebook there is a user-adjustable setting that permits root powers. If there was a liability standard about this capability, then maybe more companies would feel comfortable offering it.

The ideal would be full source access to everything, but I think there probably will have to be some intermediate steps or limits, as a means of compromise.
Presumably it is the upcoming remaster, which is Xbox One & PS4.
It's hard to buy third party titles when the only third party titles are games that came out years ago and that you already own on other platforms... It's also hard to buy first party titles when there are so few, and so few new IP at that (Splatoon, what else?). (I went into a Gamestop for the first time in a while a few weeks ago, was kind of surprised at how limited the Wii U selection still is at the end of its life.) What Nintendo needs is a set of "second party" devs like they had in the N64 era. But that's expensive.
It cuts the list shorter, but still not quite second place: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_cities_b...
Serverless – Automate AMI Creation / Deletion Using AWS Lambda
It might be slightly good to at least mention that AMD and Intel both worked on this at about the same time.
I may make this edit next time I push an update for something else.

I welcome pedantic critiques because, well..I too am pedantic.

:D
For managing side effects, redux-saga[0] is god-send if you are using redux.

[0]: https://github.com/yelouafi/redux-saga
It's just another factor. Some people are just more predisposed to depression. However I imagine that it's possible for everyone to get depression with the right circumstances.
Cheap imitations are old as time. You ever watch antiques roadshow? Every episode there's at least one knockoff. And even those can be 100+ years old and still worth money.a knockoff just means people like the design.
You know what they (physicists and astronomers) say...Its never Aliens.
That's ridiculous. My 2+ year old Mercedes self drives on the freeway quite nicely. They do require I keep my hands on the wheel, but other than that, it's doing the driving.

Other manufacturers aren't simply responding to Elan.
I have a 1928 craftsman bungalow. Not especially good quality. The architectural style has experienced a revival of sorts now. The build quality of 1920s bungalows varied a lot, just like it does for houses now.
Beignet: OpenCL for Intel's on Chip GPU's
The Test Mode is supposed to have an '*' before the number and after the number.
While this is probably true, I think this argument is used to defend things that could totally be handled without any (or with very minimal) javascript. Turbolinks or Pjax will get you most of the way toward the interactivity people are used to with single page JS apps. Of course there are interactions that necessitate more Javascript. In my experience, those cases are the exception, not the rule.
Naive question: How does Elm manage to bootstrap a complex thing like a REPL without using basic functions like '+'?
Don't extensions have their own DOM (like they have in Chrome)? Why would anyone run Angular on a browser page? It would probably conflict with existing application.

It looks like Firefox extension architecture has design problems.

And I don't like the presentation. One could think that Angular is vulnerable which is not true. The vulnerability appears when it is used in a wrong way in a browser extension.
Flying without ID is pretty hard, and driving without it (if you're the driver) is illegal in most states.
No, Tesla doesn't want to do automatic driving now. They want to hype it now. The software isn't ready yet. In their announcement, they say that the new hardware will, right now, support fewer automatic driving features than the current hardware.

Low-cost LIDAR is a problem that can be solved with money and a customer ready to buy a lot of units. So far, no car company has said "we'll take a million units a year at $100 if they meet these specs." It's lack of demand, not lack of technology. It's a risk for the LIDAR maker. There are automotive radars available better than those currently on cars, but they don't have a volume buyer yet.
If they can nail you for a felony w/ parallel construction, and you've legitimately acted in a wrongful way, I'd be fine with that.
Your internal open positions need not match your external open positions.

We all get that you really are saying "salary is dependent upon experience". The argument made above is simply that each of those ranges ought to be called out explicitly.
How prescient pre-Snowden (2013).
I must have missed the part where Trump promised to round all of the "screaming SJW types" and assorted left-wing strawmen up into camps, or whatever this "smackdown" you're looking forward to is.

I can't believe people are supporting Trump for no other reason than a desire to see him rustle some jimmies.
> And now apparently even paying $100,000 will not be enough to give full ownership rights to a car.

I think that's a good thing because it allows Tesla to receive an income that is closer to the value they have created.

The value of a Blu-ray disc bought to watch at home is about $15. The value of a Blu-ray disc bought to play in a movie theatre is much higher. It's great that the movie studio can place restrictions on how you use the Blu-ray because it means the studio receives an income closer to the total value they have created. If there were no such restrictions the movie industry would be smaller and would make fewer movies.

The value of an autonomous Tesla car bought for private use is about $60,000. The value of an autonomous Tesla car bought for ride-sharing is much higher. It's great that Tesla can place restrictions on how you use the car because it means they receive an income closer to the total value they have created. If there were no such restrictions the car industry would be smaller and would make fewer autonomous cars.

If you feel it's wrong to place restrictions on the use of a Blu-ray, what is the benefit that outweighs having a smaller movie industry and fewer movies available to consumers?

If you feel it's OK to place restrictions on the use of a Blu-ray but not on an autonomous Tesla, what's the difference?
I was thinking before the blog post confirmed the Tegra (and I had already known of the Tegra rumors from months ago) that by March 2017 it ought to be possible to stick one and maybe two GTX 1080s in that form factor... There's already a laptop that crammed two of them inside. That would make for a killer powerhouse. Of course it's modern Nintendo, they don't care about technical capability...
Because those are terrible ideas when applied to the core functionality of an application.
You can find same kind of "vulnerability" in jQuery:

$(element).html(user input);

This will evaluate scripts in "user input". Does this mean jQuery is vulnerable? No, it just means you are doing something wrong with it.

UPD: I was wrong, jQuery inserts a script tag into DOM instead of directly calling eval() so the code above is not equivalent to eval and is another type of vulnerability.
I think you're looking for an objective truth that just doesn't exist. People change their minds. People have different opinions on things from one day to the next, based on what they just read. People will publicly say "the right thing" while privately having reservations about it - and that's ok.

Now if they go round saying the exact opposite in private, and condemn their own public remarks, then there's a problem. But that's mostly not the case.
There’s no need for a framework since you can do:

values = User.objects.all().values('id', 'username')

results = json.dumps(values)

…or use the builtin JSON serializer. You can also use Paginator to paginate the results.
> US citizens are routinely tried abroad, as well.

Unless treaties give jurisdiction to laughable U.S. military courts, which is often the case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cavalese_cable_car_disaster_(1...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1995_Okinawa_rape_incident
Last time I checked, in Rails there's no Controller class that has all the built-in functionality of a DRF ViewSet. For example, you still have to perform the DB queries for every action yourself, rather than just define a queryset and serializer for the entire class and let the framework handle the rest (no pun intended).
Ends justify the means is not a wise axiom to base a surveillance system on.
> existing sensor suite was proven to be a total joke in actual use

The existing sensor suite was is sufficient for the existing driving assist functions. The existing suite was never expected to be sufficient to provide the predicted, future levels of autodrive.

What do human sensors cover? Primarily our eyes. Have we had sensors that provide about the same dynamic range as our human vision?

I am NOT a part of this field, so please excuse my presumption.

I believe that most/all(?) current/previous 'automated control' systems used sensors that were lower resolution than our eyes, but that also provided some indication of range data.

Do our eyes provide distance data? I think that data is calculated with quite a bit of accuracy in our brains.

Again, I'm not part of this field, so this is just speculation.

In theory, given a fast enough computer and advanced enough algorithm, given nothing but visual input streams no more advanced than are available with existing optics, could a car autopilot not be just as good a driver as a human?