skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Offer loans between particular serious
Contact : beatricepfam@gmail.com

I represent private investors willing to invest funds
important in all of the countries economically
stable and whose national regulations do not oppose the

foreign investment.
We are interested in any beneficial activity in the private sector .
We are looking for a business opportunity profitable .
We are therefore available to finance any private company
that will meet our criteria whose main goals are:
1/ The search for profit common.
2/ The investment of our funds in activities in safe and cost-effective.
The person interested in our investment project will need to send us
of information concerning its activities, its professional experience, its
proposals and other information if necessary in view of a possible
collaboration. If our proposals seem interesting, please contact us so
to receive more information.

PERSONAL LOAN : 10.000 € to 950.000 €

FINANCING - INVESTMENT : 1.000.000 € to 200,000,000 €

INTEREST RATE FIXED : 2% to 15 %

DURATION OF REPAYMENT : 2 to 50 years

Please send us your request to our email address : beatricepfam@gmail.com
Searching for hidden truths: a conversion tale
Every current system, and the last several Nintendo systems, have had physical media and digital purchase options. That the system accepts physical media tells us nothing.
Kick Off 2 also make it really easy to score chipped shots, which we really don't see a lot of in most leagues.
True. Although I actually did enjoy Peanuts as a child, it's very much from an adult perspective. Calvin and Hobbes is definitely the other side of that coin: childhood from a child's perspective.
Well according to SpaceX it was an anomaly ;)
Verizon seems to think it's a better investment to spend money on ads saying their network is good, than actually spending money on making the network good.
I think it's dependent on what the data is. We still haven't seen the JFK files... I'm guessing they were smart enough to only keep physical copies of that.
Direct link to the YouTube video. It doesn't load with uBlock Origin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5uik5fgIaI
Sure, ideally, I would like to see Tesla open up its self-driving systems to new inputs and modifications, and just disclaim all liability for the consequences. I think it would promote more innovation and novel uses for the software.

However, Tesla is aware that they (and others developing automobile autonomy systems) are under scrutiny, and that, in the eyes of the public, the media, and regulators, they simply cannot divest themselves of liability. This is especially true because of the hazardous nature of cars and the novelty of the technology. They've already been publically embarrassed by having one of their cars hacked into. I do not think they have any appetite for opening up a novel flagship product to unapproved mucking-about, and I cannot honestly blame them. They are covering their asses.
Your numbers are off... according to Amazon's durability notes, if you have 400 billion objects then Amazon would expect to lose less than 40 per year, not 40,000. And for that level of storage, you're paying Amazon something like a quarter million dollars per year to do storage for you.

My point is that there is no point in taking that kind of durability guarantee into account, because there are much bigger threats to data storage. It's kind of like saying that driving by car is very safe if you don't get into an accident--while technically true, it's not a very useful fact.
Meh. While email hacks are obviously different than "whistleblowing" nobody would be batting an eye if somebody had hacked a trove of Mafia (or other organized crime) emails and released them publicly.

The reality is that sometimes hacking is in the public interest and sometimes it's not, but figuring out when is not easy or black and white.

One aspect to these discussions that I find sort of befuddling is the idea that somehow those involved in "making the news" (so to speak) shouldn't have to think about what they're saying or how they're saying it unless they're "on the record," that we should expect their public face to be a mask hiding any insight into the private face behind it, and that somehow they ought to be magically protected from the potential publicizing of recordings, hacks, or eavesdropping.

Clearly the public at large is somewhat jaded and cynical, but there's still a very obvious desire to have "honest" and "open" candidates who make their goals, intentions, and ideologies clear. Of course the public theoretically wants to know how the sausage is made.

That the candidates can't recognize this and can't or won't operate as though the public might be watching without crying foul seems to me a bigger farce than pretending that one's own words are a conspiracy... but what do I know?

I guess the idea that one ought to maintain some level restraint and conviviality both publicly and privately is dated and quaint.
I want to be optimistic, I really do.

Winter is here, however, I'm looking forward to roads covered with snow, slush, ice, and animals. I'm looking forward to winds in excess of 30mph driving snow across the highway, limiting visibility to a hundred feet or so. I'm looking forward to inexperienced folks driving on ice and snow and being a good 20mph below the rest of the traffic.

People can barely handle these roads (a two day snow storm last week put dozens of cars and semis in the ditch); I'm not sure how a Tesla will handle them. What will it look for when there are no lines on the road to be seen? How will it know the difference between slush, powdered snow, and plowed snow (which is only slightly less hard than a concrete barrier)?

I'm sure the answer is currently "don't allow automatic driving", but these kinds of conditions can reign over half the year in the mid-west; what value is a self driving car which can't half the time?
Didn't realize destructible was a solo project. Great work!
Private accounts of private citizens are viewed by the government on a daily basis. Why should I care about anyone who works for the government's privacy? This is a board that argues extremely frequently that privacy is dead and/or completely impractical in the modern age - a statement that's apparently fine to make about social media or adtech companies and their products, but upsetting when it comes to the government? We've been marching down this road for a long time now.
+1. Also, uniregistry as well.
Strange - in my state, recording a conversation without notifying the other party is a felony.
Why? You'll earn the same money as with Uber.

No I won't. It's simple economics that I won't.

Assuming a future where I can choose to rent my car's free time to a ride sharing app. You just told me that I'd be able to make just as much money locked into a single customer as I would if different customers had to compete to rent my car's free time.

And yes blah blah blah I could buy a different type of car. But market forces don't break this sort of monsopoly until "what app can I rent my car's time to" is the TOP purchase differentiator to a very sizable portion of auto buyers.
The Wii U dev program for Unity and HTML5 wasn't that hard to join even before they fully opened it up.

The native program has been what major publishers use though, and that one is harder to get into (It was known as Warioworld)
Or we could just repeal all the various laws advantaging the Republican and Democratic Parties over third-parties, open up local, state, and federal elections to real competition, and then let the surviving parties function as private organizations that nobody is forced to vote for.

My objection is that when I walk into the voting booth this November, I will be forced to vote for a Democrat. I mean this literally: most offices on my ballot will not be contested, not even by a Republican. The most competitive races will have a Republican versus a Democrat, but most actual races will just have a Democrat. The actual decision-making for most officials who run my life was decided in the Democratic Primaries. I voted in those too, but most of those weren't contested either.

This happens because if you're a Republican or Democrat, your party declares your candidacy and boom, you're on the ballot. If you're not, you need a signature drive to run for town dog-catcher.

I'm just saying that I want more than one choice for every election up and down the ballot, and I want the available choices determined by public support for the movement, party, or candidate, rather than by legal privileging of particular private organizations.
The implication behind this article is that any sort of unrest would be completely Donald Trump's fault. But what people seem to forget is that Donald Trump has a reason for waiting to cede the presidency. Gore lost the election even though he got the popular vote. There were massive irregularities in the Democratic primaries, and the media has been biased and partisan, mostly in favor of Hillary Clinton, since the beginning.

I understand why some people are afraid of his hesitance. I hope they at least understand the reason he's doing so.
> But saying "Okay, but we're not responsible for damages" will not fly with regulators, legislators, public opinion or the integrity of their brand.

Why not? It flies just fine now with physical goods. If someone hand-builds their own bicycle wheel, and installs it on their bicycle, and then the wheel breaks and they crash... no one is blaming the bike manufacturer. No one is saying "that bike company should have welded the safer wheels on and issued a license prohibiting wheel alterations."

Everyone gets that the customer took the liability in their own hands once they started using their own hands to modify the product. It's the classic trade-off of freedom vs. security.

This ability to allocate liability to the customer is part of what we DO need for software, IMO. Right now there is a popular perception that software cannot be modified or interacted with by anyone but the company who wrote it. I don't think that has to be true forever though.
> The latency to the screen is fixed with no jitter. The human mind can adapt.

In addition, latency is cumulative and after a certain threshold becomes extremely annoying. Adding network delays to the already-present latency elsewhere in the system just makes you more likely to hit that threshold.
What about updates? Are manufactures obligated to provide: security patches? mainline updates? feature additions? source and build ability for self/after-market changes?

Warranties on physical goods have a long history (in the US) of being void if the owner makes certain changes. Should that apply to software?

(great comment btw)
You are making my point. It makes no sense to call a sandwich cheaper than a condo when you are evaluating what to buy when looking for a place to live. That is what I was pointing out.

Testing and linting does different things. Of course a sandwich is cheaper than a condo, but what does that have to do with what we are talking about?

As for the claim that you can't have unit tests for everything: What do you mean? No, you can't test all branches or combinations in a system, but you can have a 100% test coverage (aka. hitting each line at least once).
Building a chat bot using Chatfuel and APi.Ai
We live halfway between this world and the next. If you don't own it, then justify paying full price?
Is it just me or the console mechanism looks fragile ?
If you keep pulling and putting the side remotes, it looks like it might break in the future.

Also, it will be quite the challenge for nintendo to gain momentum with the handheld part of the console. Everyone plays on phones and tablets these days, so i don't see much incentive on that part.

They should've stalled pokemon go and launched it with the new console.

That would create a massive demand for the new console.
Now is your chance to show what other you evidence you have and dispute his snarky fanboy comment.
It's the focus that I'm talking about: LMP is an increasingly rare feature in games, save indies (which usually don't have online MP), and a few genres (Fighting Games, Rhythm Games). For example, AFAIK the new Halos don't have LMP. I know several other shooters have dropped it.
Let's be honest, no one has ever had to farm for Rupees in Zelda :)
> Meh. While email hacks are obviously different than "whistleblowing" nobody would be batting an eye if somebody had hacked a trove of Mafia (or other organized crime) emails and released them publicly.

...but the Mafia are a priori criminals, while politicians are not (except in a sophomoric "all politicians are liars" kind of way).

What crime did Powell commit to have his everyday privacies exposed to the world?
Tesla has a history of aggressive behavior, so I don't think it's as clear cut as you make it out. Witness the guy who plugged into his ethernet port, found references to the Model 3, only to have Tesla remote in, downgrade his vehicle firmware to one that didn't have more references, so he couldn't discover more information, then disable his ethernet port completely, and send him a letter about his "unauthorized use of the car".

That wasn't protecting themselves from litigation. That's saying "this car is ours, you just get to use it, and we control how".

Just like you cannot get a service manual for Tesla vehicles. Except in MA, where it's required by law. Where you have to make an appointment, go into their office, and view the manual on-site, and can't take it with you. I believe you also have to pay a fee to do so, or at least did.
For what it's worth, I don't think you should have merged these stories. This is about the video, which was released a full day later. Curious to hear people's take on the video without wading through the old comments. You also now have people who wont notice that there's something new to discuss.
Already done in Ocaml for projects willing to use something other than OpenSSL:

https://github.com/mirleft/ocaml-tls

It's performance was within 80% or so of regular TLS with Ocaml's safety and easier verification. Quite a few components were purely functional, too. I've seen SML embedded in LISP's and PreScheme compiled to efficient C or ASM. So, that means a static LISP could handle it piggybacking on C compilers. Ivory embeds a subset of C in Haskell to keep things easy to analyze and automatically safe. Parts of a SSL library could use it.

http://ivorylang.org/ivory-introduction.html

So, Haskell, LISP, and ML are already capable of replacing our SSL libraries if people choose. One is already done in Ocaml. COGENT, if people apply it to this, will take it further by having an easier-to-verify implementation in functional language with certified compilation to C or assembly.
> But saying "Okay, but we're not responsible for damages" will not fly with regulators, legislators, public opinion or the integrity of their brand.

Why not? It's how everything else works. If you buy a house and then install your own electrical wiring which causes your house to burn down, you have no claim against the construction company and nobody blames them for it because it was your fault, not theirs.

This recent attitude of "people won't understand, therefore corporations have to be paternalistic" is patronizing and factually incorrect. People do actually understand. The worst outcome is that technology-ignorant bureaucrats require companies to clamp down on modding. But having companies do that to begin with is no improvement.

The basis of this seems to be the conceit that manufacturers can actually control their products after they've been sold. It can be true for a time, in the sense that it takes people that long to figure out how to break back into the things they own, but it happens. If you can jailbreak an iPhone then you can jailbreak your car.

Which means that we have a choice. The first option is to accept the inevitable and support it. Expect people to make changes and take responsibility for their own changes, and facilitate that. The second is to try to lock everything down, so that the people making modifications have no access to documentation and have to be running out of date software because the old version with the jailbreak vulnerability is the same old version with the anti-lock brake glitch, which makes it much more likely that people will die. What does that do for your brand?
No, this is pretty much all new. But there are plenty of places in the tooling besides the project file where you would list off the target frameworks (e.g. nuget). I assume they're all a semi-colon separated list thus making this consistent across everything.
works fine for me, no subscription, did you hit the free limit?
It's sort of like startups. 90% of potential world-shaking innovations fail but pretty much everything that changed the world looked risky at one time. It's important to be sensitive to both sides of the coin.
US working people, too! Just fewer of us per capita, because a lot of cities' public transit infrastructure isn't what it might be.
> Software modification has a lot of visibility, especially since Teslas log everything

What I mean by visibility is that you can't fudge it, that reality is plainly visible to all actors.

Income is not visible directly (although what one's house looks like for example is visible and is a good indication of income). If you meet a well-dressed guy in a Starbucks, you have no idea whether he's crippled with debt or whether he has so much money he doesn't know what to do with. And that's true regardless of the fact that income is regulated by the government, that banks keep records and all that.

Software is NOT visible in that sense: whether your microwave is running code that will make it explode when you type in 9999 or not, is not something that can be known by everyone but the first person who has access to the device, let alone the public who couldn't understand how to compare two hashes anyway.

As far as any third party is concerned, Tesla could just be faking logs and no one would know. Actually, you may not see it still, so imagine that say, GM, suddenly releases an autonomous car and it crashes. Do you trust them when they tell you that the logs say the driver was at fault?
I totally agree with the Geary line, although I'd prefer an alternative line: one that goes all the way from downtown to ocean beach under Golden Gate Park, with stops at the major museums and other tourist attractions in the park. From the middle of the park, you can reach both Irving/Judah (major Sunset street) and Geary (although Geary is a hike from the center of the park).
mobileye doesnt use lidar on Teslas, it was always one low resolution camera, barely enough for lane following.
Depends if its a civilian that say news international or a jounalists wants to "monster"
The same thing happened to me and opening the link in incognito mode allowed me to read it. I think I've used my quota of free articles for the month though.
Jason Ratliff New “Super Shadow” Art Series
Which is it, that you "don't mind", or that you "support" it?

If you support it, why? Otherwise, your comment adds no more substance than me saying "I'm against this." and offering no further explanation.
See also: http://hnnotify.leknarf.net
TravelBank: Smarter Expenses with Budgets
i will take it over he current state because it makes walking, cycling, and bus transit safer. it will be interesting to find out by what magnitude.
Weird. Was the thread title edited? "Switch – New Video Game System [video]." I'm pretty sure everyone knows who Nintendo is and it's more descriptive to say that in the title.
Legal: might be an idea that may violate terms and conditions of the sort of services it targets.

Business: without substantial cash reserves require to play market maker, it will probably be hard to create a liquid market where buyers have a good chance of obtaining the service the want and sellers have a good chance of finding a willing buyer.

Prototype: I'd rather see something without a few more months of polish today, than sign up for a for an announcement. Or I'd prefer a link to the alpha over providing an email.

Good luck.
It is collected directly by the BBC.
The thing about their plan though, if you read the post entirely, is that this new car with the new sensor comes with almost all features disabled.

The reality is, with machine learning, you need a lot of data, and yes, you can send a few of your own cars with employees inside like Google, but that's slow. Instead, Tesla is using their existing brand and user base to collect orders of magnitude more data, and this way, they will be able to validate their models much faster.

Again, the thing with data and algorithms is that you can test and retest them. When you have all the data, you can see the info at time X, and also have access to the data at time X+1, so you can check if your algorithm made the right choice. Furthermore, you can actually take tricky situations and replay them thousands of time while tweaking your algorithm to do better.

So yes, while getting it right is very important, I believe their approach of collecting as much data as possible is the best way of getting there
You're assuming a future with one app; Tesla. There are, and will continue to be, more apps, hence competition.

And we'v not covered that the dynamics are different. With Tesla you're not paying for fuel. Or for human time. You literally earn money while you do something else. This means that, over time, Uber and Lyft would be saturated by Teslas because it's a race to the bottom in terms of profit.
Level 5 is unachievable and unnecessary. There will always be some small number of locales that confound the system. But if you can't use autonomy a few times per year, who cares?

When we get to level 4 the game is over, it's just an adoption curve at that point.
I most excited by the prospect that this supports local WLAN multiplayer. At least that's what it looks like in the video.