skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I've left. I've left every time, and I've got a resume full of shit jobs I left after a year because they were shit, and I'm not sure what to do at this point to get the kind of position where this isn't how things are, where the sky is blue and up isn't down.

If there's part of the industry that's not like this, I haven't seen it and none of the people I've worked with have seen it, and I don't know it. At this point my wife has all but begged me to give up and settle for steady money with no purpose, my therapist is telling me to consider going back to school and pull a career change. I'm the only person I know in real life where there's any expectation that software makes sense and I question myself, wondering if pragmatic engineering in software is just a fantasy perpetuated by strangers on the internet.
OECD median income per country: http://www.oecd.org/social/income-distribution-database.htm

The US poverty line household income is $22,541, this is more than the median income in Poland, and not that far from the median household income in developed countries like Belgium.
What you describe only solves the problem of wealthy parents providing an advantage when the tutoring and/or computer system is perfect with respect to what is available otherwise. At any point where it could be improved wealthy families will be able to take advantage of that improvement for their children. This is a natural consequence of how we value our young and their future.

What you describe would be good to reduce the advantage of wealth on outcome, but it's also papering over how hard the problem is. The real problem is getting from here to there. It's akin to saying "well, just eliminate racism." Sure, that's a good idea, nobody should object to that. But it's not like we'll wake up a year from now and say "problem solved!". As a simple example of this, we probably can't make good computer tutors for kids without somewhat good AI. That's not exactly an easy problem to solve.
I believe it's for statistical purposes(if it's anything like death codes here in Aus).

If there is an uptick in dolphin strikes, the Government(or some environmental management group) may do something about the dolphin problem.
For starters, there is the core that acts like a heatsink. Then there is also the smaller profile. I don't know if you've seen the previous Mac Pros, but they were huge.

Also your argument does not add up! Are you saying it is not great because the components are off the shelf? Going by that logic, all the modern cars have the same IC engine. The Mac Pro clearly has more capable hardware, why is that not enough? why does it have to be a magic chip?
also, was going to ask if you actually knew an example of an app calling an external api and then I happily found a walkthrough on your blog :) http://javaeeeee.blogspot.com/
Electrochemical Nano Diffusion Invented by Highschooler Now a Company
The journalists decided what to publish, not Snowden. It seems there isn't any case that resulted from that. The US would until now try to get Greenwald if they thought they had a case against him.
Stop reading libertarian / right wing / whatever propaganda, open your eyes to the real world. I've lived on both sides of the Atlantic. Being poor in America is a lot worse than being poor in Europe. Dress up your statistics all you like, the fact is America is a trap for anyone below middle class.

That's not saying there are rivers of milk and honey flowing in the EU either. But over there, at least you still have access to decent health care even if you're at the rock bottom, and at least your kids could get decent education so they achieve escape velocity.

But here? Once you're below a certain level, society just throws you on the dung heap. Leaves you to your own proverbial "bootstraps", however stupid that meme may sound when you see how things could be handled differently in a civilized world.
I feel like the burden falls on the accuser
Did TLP just completely stop after being outed or is there something still happening with a book?
IIRC some of his other videos show how you can duplicate and move objects around in-game.
Well, on a phishing page the user could still type in the username and password before clicking submit. Only after submitting the username and password do authentication layers require the user to interact with their mobile device (which is usually how it works). Some users might forget that they are supposed to 2FA (say, on their first few days at the job).

What if the password input would only be shown after the user typed in their username, pressed submit and confirmed that they were trying to log in using their mobile device?

* Input username

* Press submit

* Interact with mobile device for 2FA

* Input password

* Press submit
https://urbit.org/ - deep and exciting one

This article [1] is a good start even though it's 6 years old. It's not vaporware anymore, I haven't checked it in a while, but it seems to be actively developed.

If you feel that you've learned enough programming languages that you have a problem finding anything new this may give you some dopamine.

1. http://moronlab.blogspot.com/2010/01/urbit-functional-progra...
It's not "fully subjective" by any sensible definition. Yes humans are the measurement device, and humans differ and are unreliable, but given a sufficient number of samples you arrive at more accurate numbers.

Nobody's going to give a paprika the same rating as a Carolina Reaper. You might have some give two very strong peppers the same rating, but then you might just need more people to test it.

In any case, the practical utility of the scale is mostly to get an idea of how spicy something is, it doesn't really matter much if something is 700K or 600K, it's enough to know that it's around 2x as strong as a Habanero.
I understand the frustration.

I think at one point in time, the Freedoom project was moving in the direction of cloning the Doom assets closely enough that it'd suffice as a replacement for the original iwads, and as such would've made a setup like you described possible (without committing copyright infringement). People argued that the iwads are easy enough to get now, and somewhat recently, the freedoom project seemed to take on a new direction, which is less about making close clones of the original assets and more about being a game on its own right with its own theme and roster of enemies and all that. It's a bit weird, especially considering that they're still maintaining the vanilla gameplay elements unchanged, as if it were still built for the original purpose, yet the assets won't look good with pwads. Needless to say, I'm not super happy about this new direction.

There are launchers that supposedly make it easier to run pwads though. I don't have the background knowledge to recommend one though; source ports are available to me through my package manager.
But phishers can praxy the 3rd party site to you. And this isn't hard to do. It might help w/ your relatives, but for anything even mildly targeted you can certainly rent a couple t2.nano to pull this off...
Banks Challenge Venmo with New Payments Network Dubbed Zelle
great tip, thanks!
My favorite: W61.62 Struck by duck
If this is not a problem for you then good for you : )

For some of us it is a constant struggle.

My biggest contributors for this specific thing (weekend procrastination) are probably:

* fear of investing a lot of time without being able to finish (I get interrupted all the time outside of work). This might sound stupid, but it is really draining me to the point where when I was younger and not married I'd go to bed shortly after work, wake up and go to the office in the middle of the night just to get something I wanted to do done.

* fear of failure, coupled with perfectionism, leading to hesitation while I wait or even more dangerous, search for the perfect solution. I worked my way towards "sloppiness", telling myself it is only a draft, I can always get back to it later etc. Helpful resources: "Cult of Done" http://www.manifestoproject.it/bre-pettis-and-kio-stark/ as well as "The Now habit" by Neil Fiore.

Now for anyone who doesn't struggle: there is nothing here (unless you want to be a good boss that happens to magically make people like us output more good stuff in shorter time while enjoying work).
I've more than a few friends who didn't use gloves when they were handling hot peppers. Then they rubbed their eyes, or worse, have to go pee and handled their junk. Just imagine the burn you had all day on your fingers being in your eyes or other sensitive parts of your body.

The gloves are a safety precaution and should be used every time - just in case.
Isn't it basically a ripof of dollar shave club?
We've banned this account for posting only inflammatory political comments.
">> Bernie laid out how he was going to pay for it.

> And his plans were widely panned as requiring completely impossible GDP growth and otherwise severely lacking in details."

What details are you aware of regarding the funding plans Bernie had for free college tuition and free-at-the-point-of-use healthcare?
>> "Collective code ownership may be the most pernicious thing to happen to code since the advent of Javascript."

Great quote. I've seen some great code quickly turn to spaghetti under the guise of Collective Code Ownership.
I use flask for a personal project of mine, but instead of Mithril for the frontend, I use http://riotjs.com/. I find it much more readable for someone who has been working with HTML/CSS for quite some time.
Haha, I was also thinking about the Swinging Door while reading these comments. I haven't even had the courage to try their XXX burger yet, the "basic" habanero burger is already enough for me. If you ever go back, try getting an ice cream sandwich after your burger, works much better than water :)
I don't think I'd call what Google does 2-factor authentication. Unless I'm missing some option to change this behavior, it's still 1-factor, but what changes when you enable it is which factor is the fundamentally required one. With it disabled, you have one factor, the password; anyone who gets it can log on. With it enabled, the password is no longer the single factor, but it is also no longer a required factor at all, because the password-reset mechanism goes through the same phone number used for the 2fa SMS pushes. So now the phone (or more specifically, ability to receive SMSs to the saved number) becomes the single factor. To be actual 2fa, someone in possession of only one of the two factors shouldn't be able to override the other factor.

There are obvious reasons Google does it this way, and it is probably a net increase in security, because a phone as a single factor is less often compromised than a password as a single factor. But I don't like calling that particular arrangement 2fa.
> Affluent parents pass high IQ and conscientiousness

I'll have to go with 'citation needed'.
I was shadowbanned on twitter for posting links to peer reviewed medical papers on the negative health effects of obesity with some 'fat acceptance' tags like #HAES. I assumed it was done by algorithm after obese people reported it
Analyzing 2016's Tech IPO Market with IPO Expert Barrett Daniels
And you actually pointed out why those two things are different.

We understand Star Wars is space wizards. New-agers do not understand that their beliefs are mostly bogus.
Thanks but I think HN crowd will actually love the details if you in position to share some.
Why are you so confident that the IQ test is measuring "intelligence"?

The causes of wealth, scholastic performance, etc. are quite important for policy. Therefore we should hold a higher burden of proof for causal inference on those topics than, say, the communication mechanisms of ants.

It's not that folks are sweeping differences under the rug. It's that they're saying the differences might not be the things you're saying they are.
> I guess you could argue hell alters the layout.

I like that. Hell is Earth with less OSHA regulations. ;)
Zero-Knowledge Encryption for MySQL
A Map of DBpedia 2016-04
Actually IIRC the law was changed so tenants only have to make sure the walls have a neutral appearance (i.e. usually white woodchip wallpaper) when moving out, so they're pretty much free to decorate the place as they want as long as they don't outright demolish or damage the walls.

There used to be a requirement for tenants to renovate the apartment (i.e. thorough cleaning, new wallpaper and white paint) before moving out but that requirement has been reduced to "besenrein" (literally "broom clean", i.e. no rubbish or dirt). Damage to windows and existing fittings etc is deducted from the deposit but tenants have the right to a formal inspection with a signed report to avoid dubious claims.

The "Kautionskonto" (the special bank account) is widespread but not universal. However there are also co-operatives that invest your deposit and actually pass on the interest to you when you move out (these apartments are rare though).

Some specifics on pets: fish and caged pets (e.g. rodents) are generally allowed within normal quantities. Cats require approval but disapproval is practically impossible unless there are very good reasons. Dogs always require approval and disapproval is more likely. Many contracts explicitly allow specific pets (including dogs). If another tenant was given permission for a dog, it's hard or impossible to make a case for forbidding a similar dog. "Kampfhunde" (attack dogs) may be more problematic.
We should also be questioning why someone that can barely pay the rent decides to have another kid (or even a kid at all).

This statement is rife with all kinds of shitty assumptions. Until Obamacare came along, it was common for health insurance in the US to not cover birth control -- yet it often covered Viagra. So, a guy who is too old to get it up anymore is entitled to sexual pleasure, but a young woman servicing a man is going to vindictively be made to pay, both literally and figuratively.

Second, a woman can be raped and end up pregnant. Rapists aren't exactly known for using protection and one rape case was determined to be not rape because the victim managed to convince her assailant to use a condom to protect her from disease. The courts determined this somehow proved consent on her part.

Third, it's quite difficult to get an abortion in the US. There are a lot of barriers to getting an abortion. So if you get raped and wind up pregnant, good luck ending it -- even though rape is supposed to be one the exceptions that allows you to get an abortion.

Fourth, there are religious faiths that tell women they are going to hell if a) they don't willingly oblige their husband for sex or b) they use any sort of birth control whatsoever.

I could probably go on, but I am a desperately poor woman who needs to try to get some work done so I can keep eating this month, in spite of having been one of the top three students of my graduating high school class and having had both my kids legitimately within the bonds of matrimony and generally having done every goddamn thing "right" that I can possibly do, but it is still FUCK YOU Michele, because, hey, women don't need no stinkin justice or respect. And before you ask: I have been celibate for more than 11 years at this point.

Wow, do assumptions of the sort you are making piss me off. It is a great way to guarantee that the world will continue to remain in the toilet, no matter how hard people work or how virtuous they are.
Definitely an inspiration! Also Squatty Potty is a favorite.
Sahi hai ye1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number
sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks customer service phone number@@quickbooks customer service number

sahi hai ye!!!1800/385-5790 quickbooks
The 3% is the percentage of people who are homosexual, not the people that support them, but I see your point.

In this discussion I'm not taking sides, just noting that the court needs to decide quasi-moral questions. Our interpretation of the Constitution depends on our current beliefs (and might even lead to an interpretation that the original founders would have rejected). The constitution clearly says that we have a right of free speech. However, as far as I am aware, it does not state that we have a) a right to marry, b) a right to do homosexual acts, or c) a right for homosexuals to marry. In fact, I believe B and C were illegal for large periods of time (anti-sodomy laws). I suggest that the Founders probably would not have seen homosexual marriage as a right. Due to changing morals, however, the Supreme Court now views it as a right. Were the laws constitutional before but not now? Were they always unconstitutional, but nobody challenged them? As a thought experiment, if societal morals changes to believe that homosexuality is actively harmful to society, would anti-sodomy laws be constitutional? The process of interpretation of rights necessarily involves our current beliefs.
Advice to Ignore: Follow Your Passion
I personally agree with you but this is how they attempt to address that point on their website:

> The token shows the location in such a way that a future civilization will be able to interpret its correct meaning. This will require a technical and scientific understanding which is comparable to our own. This is the guarantee that the archive is suitably protected from premature access. Only a civilization which fulfils these requirements will be able to find the archive as well as being able to process, decipher and comprehend its content. The depiction on the token: Two intersecting lines span a map of Europe.
Please don't complain about downvotes. Keep the discussion centered around the content of the article.
I guess I was being optimistic.

So long civilization.
A good amount of this is flat-out bad advice.
That's what I'm asking. IPv6 feels like a regressiin over NATv4 because it can leak which internal device made a request. Is there a standard way to randomize addresses that works with ofd-the-shelf router firmware. Also, are link-local IPv6 leaking MAC addresses?
it's not fair to either side to generalize like that. Also, we're all Liberals in the US, just different flavors of it.
"opportunity hoarding"

>That includes everything from legacy college admissions to unpaid internships that

>let affluent parents rig the game a little more in their children's favor.

Why does the author imply something sinister with economic division? I want my kid to succeed, so I fight for his chance to succeed. I have high end skills to offer, first in line to learn from me? My children.

This isn't deliberate exclusion of everyone unprivileged, it's hyper-inclusion of only the ones I love the most.
> You might not garden w/ no equitable return on house value (or at least not build a large gardening setup)

The return is the experience and joy of gardening, which occurs whether I own or rent.

> landlords feel the same way in reverse (no benefit to them to do anything beyond the minimum once it's inhabited)

I'm willing to pay more in rent for a higher quality residence. A well maintained garden (or the tools to make one) would certainly count towards quality.

> Except you may be more nomadic. Also you missed the GP's use of the word "stakeholder" of which you are considerably less of if you don't own land in the community

Even if I live in a place for a single week, I don't want to live in a shithole for that week. My experience living in a neighborhood makes me a stakeholder, even if I don't own land there.
Thereby perpetuating the culture that ignored the issue, and providing no downside to the individuals that ignored it.
> The vast majority of operating companies formed in the US, and I suspect most countries, are small businesses (shops, restaurants etc)

My understanding is most of these are retail (think mom-and-pop shops), construction, and professional services (think solo-practicing doctors, lawyers, accountants, etc).

The fact that I can join Google instead of incorporating Muzz's Software Consulting Services should be a good thing, not a bad thing.
A 1% error in approximating a second by a heartbeat will cause an approx 4hz error in the frequency.

Here's a chart of the distribution of heartrates found in random middle-aged people measured over 24hours: https://d1ieb9vw5zjdt6.cloudfront.net/content/europace/7/2/1...

Source: http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/content/7/2/104
> I don't think some people realize the value of a hard day's night.

What do you mean by a hard day's night? AFAIK this expression was invented by the Beatles for their eponymous song and means something like "a rough day". But that doesn't really make sense in the context of your comment so I'm wondering if there's some usage that I (and a quick googling) am unaware of.
I recently saw a link, that I unfortunately can't find, where someone senior affiliated with Defcon or black hat nearly got phished. He was rushing packing in the midst of a flurry of amazon shipments to travel to some conference and got a very well timed phishing email asking him to confirm some sort of shipment details for amazon. He fortunately noticed it was the wrong product, but I seem to remember had started typing his info already.

If someone like that can get nearly fooled, there's little hope for the rest of us or our families.

It's time to give up preventing phishing and start working on amelioration.

ps -- if anybody knows the story I'm talking about, I'd love the link.
Shouldn't Google easily be able to mitigate a login from Africa (or just a different country or even a never-before-used IP)?
had one and returned it. They don't provide much value beyond real-time notifications & a fancy pedometer.
Dropping out of high school isn't "doing everything wrong" and finishing college is pretty far from "doing everything right" so this seems to be a little bit of editorial journalism.

From the paper: "Children who go on to achieve a college degree, irrespective of their parents’ income, are more likely to make it to the top income quintile [...] Bottom-income children without a diploma have a 54% probability of remaining on the bottom rung as adults."

So really what it says is that you have a much better shot in life being educated regardless of who you are. But if you don't like to stay in school, you'd better be rich, because there are some chances you will end up being rich anyway. If you are poor and don't stay in school, you are very likely just live your life miserably.
STORM Wave – The First Electric Touring Motorcycle