skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I know the article focused on 2D, but it's worth mentioning www.vtk.org for 3D. C++ native, with excellent Python bindings.
Hebrew has "A-dom" for red, and "Bordo" (pronounced how a kid would misread a transliteration of Bordeaux, as in the red wines) for dark red.

We also have "Ka-chol" ("ch" pronounced like "phlegm" in "Achmad the Dead Terrorist") for blue and "Tche-let" for light blue, which are words you learn in kindergarten and use every day (you say "sky is Tche-let", never "sky is Ka-chol". When have you last heard someone describe a mid-day summer sky in English as anything but "blue"?)

Sure, we also have artist words for a thousand variations of blue: turquoise, aqua, aquamarine, etc'. In fact, just like in English, we use the French terms as is. But nobody learns them in kindergarten.
None of those are the same as the russian color, but more importantly, those aren't considered basic color terms[0]

Basic color terms need to be:

- monolexemic ("green", but not "light green" or "forest green"),

- high-frequency, and

- agreed upon by speakers of that language.[7]

All of those words you listed aren't high frequency.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_term#Basic_color_terms
source on the source being russian hackers? besides from msm echochamber?
There are really damaging things -- although nothing surprising and that's why I think nobody is talking about it. E.g. in one email HRC talks about how Qatar is funding ISIS, and in the next they're giving Bill Clinton a $1m check for his birthday. The wallstreet stuff would've definitely tilted the balance to Bernie Sanders in the primaries. Finally, the level of involvement with the press is far more than I could've ever imagined (the NYT is sending the HRC campaigns drafts of stories for approval before they come out, and promise complete support).

I found this site which summarizes the finding (tweeted by a Trump supporter): http://www.vaskal.ca/podestafiles
It's not dirty to merely express yourself, but it still might have unintended consequences.

If you lose, and they turn out just to be a TV personality that is ineffectual politically it will hurt your credibility.

And, if you win, maybe the republican party falls apart, and four years later you are up against a real hard-right party, like is seen in some European countries.

I am personally far more worried about what will rise from the Alt-Right's ashes when he loses, than what will come to pass in the strange future in which he wins.
I don't believe I made any outrageous claims. I literally linked to a CNN article (which is usually considered middle to slightly left leaning) regarding a top clinton donor being appointed to a security committee.

I definitely don't think you should disregard others opinions just because,

"There are also people who believe Obama created Hurricane Matthew to suppress turnout without, using his network of wind farms."

That has no weight, and is just a deflection.
Reporting for future record: This post was flagged less than ten minutes after being posted, without any comments.
The Ultimate Guide to Get Knowledge Graph for Your Brands/Names/Blogs
If your HTML is cacheable: You just need to set your HTTP header's appropriately.

You can also invest in a CDN. Now we have a React.js SSR with 0ms server response time! :)
Clinton emails: 'Quid pro quo' bid to bury Benghazi message
Thorium based reactors, anyone?
I ran a Macbook Pro for a while and found Homebrew to be a really poor imitation. I had a lot of issues with it (broken packages, manual intervention required, etc...), things didn't seem as up to date as I'd expect, and the range of packages was poor. It was also only usable for a small subset of the software I'd want.
I've been there for a while. I only trust a few people who thanklessly go through materials and study issues in detail. If I want to verify further I can only then trust primary sources and direct evidence.

For a long time now, all forms of traditional media have had a bent. It's just gotten very monied and politicized as of late.
I think it's exceptionally rude to call the hard work and research that goes into all of these kinds of things "no action".

Feel free to ignore the stories until it reaches whatever point interests you, but don't downplay the work others do to get you there.
What Apple does well is integrating hardware and software.

I recently drove a car with lane following and adaptive curse control and it kind of sucked. Lane following needed great road conditions so it failed miserably. But, while adaptive cruse control was nice in heavy traffic, it was also clearly tacked on. The acceleration and deceleration was felt jerky.

People can generally drive really smoothly in traffic so why suffer a machines erratic behavior when you need to focus in case it fails. Sure, do the same thing but better seems obvious but iPhone was more a response to poor completion than a truly innovative product.
Couldn't you reinforce aluminum with glass-fiber too (or carbon-fiber)?
The headline should've been "it takes 150ms to do server-side rendering with React," not, "hey everyone I can put something in Redis." I would _not_ take this person's advice. There's most likely something else really wrong with their code.

Also.... 20ms with caching the pages in Redis? That sounds really, really slow. There's definitely something else going on.
The iPhone changed humanity

It seems a but off-topic, but I have to say it. I have a problem with this.

I know iPhone's changed the industry.

But seriously, it was only a phone. A few years ahead of its time.

You know what did change humanity?

Internet.

Cell Phones.

Not iPhones..
Is this age of fear really any different than the previous?
If you're not that crazy, you can build a fusion reactor, although the design necessarily requires more energy than it puts out. Teens have built these for science fair projects.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusor
Oh the delicious irony. Let's carry out a purge based on political opinions... in the name of diversity!
> Even on Fox News they are not able to mention anything that is at the level of Trump tapes.

The Trump tapes? You mean that one 11-year-old video that shows him talking very crudely about sexual escapades?

Sure, that's reprehensible. Is it worse than what past presidents have done while in office? If not, why is it a problem now?

Why is one candidate's personal sex life a bigger problem than collusion with the media during the campaign and using a cabinet-level position to enrich oneself? That is, why is his sex life a bigger problem than her corruption exhibited while in public office, as well as her criminal mishandling of classified material, which directly harmed U.S. interests abroad, when many have been jailed for less (including since Comey's press conference)?

> PS: As far as voting is concerned, I'm still in information collection mode and don't support any candidate at this point.

That's nice. A suggestion: if you really care about who wins, look less at the candidates and more the platforms of them and their parties. The media makes it appear that this election is a contest between two people--but it's actually a contest between two competing worldviews which are vastly different from one another. You could swap any other Democrat for her and any Republican for him (though any actual Republican would differ much more from Trump than any other Democrat would differ from Clinton), and the underlying issues would be the same. The individual candidates are virtually a facade, a distraction from the real issues at stake.
Occams Razor says that they've only received credible leaks about the HRC campaign.

Seems to me like anyone with credible evidence against Trump can sell it to the highest bidding mainstream media org and be sure it will get national attention. Why would a Trump leaker need wikileaks?
Kidney beans have far more potassium (1406 mg per 100g) than bananas (358 mg per 100g). Potatoes (421 mg), sunflower seeds (645 mg), kale (421 mg) and spinach (558 mg) all also have more potassium than bananas. Bananas are not that high in potassium relative to all other foods; they are merely high relative to other fruits. (But even in fruits, avocados and figs both have more potassium than bananas.)

As the Wikipedia article on Bananas[1] states: "Although bananas are commonly thought to supply exceptional potassium content,[86] their actual potassium content is relatively low per typical food serving at only 8% of the Daily Value (right table). A compilation of potassium content in common foods consumed in the United States shows that raw bananas rank 1,611th, supplying 358 mg of potassium per 100 g".

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banana
At the point where you're able to cache the exact HTML you're returning to the client, it's more efficient to do that in front of your node server than behind it. A cache hit can avoid your application completely, which is a real boon for performance and scalability. You can run your own caching http proxy, like varnish, or use a CDN like Fastly.
And I'm sure, were his sources to give him a cache of (ostensibly) damaging documents about Trump, he'd drip-drip it out along with teasers and editorialized (and falsely contextualized) snippets, too.

Of course, that's not what's going to happen, because Wikileaks is in effect if not design a propaganda organ of the Russian Federation.
675 comments and no one actually knows what we're talking about.

What does "cut" mean? Why can't he just use a hotspot?
That's not what they said at all. The example of red wine vs a bright red robe is a very valid one. You might become more specific when tasked with artistically describing the colour of a wine, but off the cuff you'd probably just use the word "red" for wine, blood (oxygenated or not), ink and sunsets in a way that wouldn't work in Hungarian.
Check who owns Twitter.
Clintons say they are running as a team. You can't take the good without the bad.

You say women that have settled in court or accused of Clinton of sexual assault should not be believed. BUT Trumps alleged should be believed. Hillary stated all rape victims have a right to be believed.

In your mind should we or should we not believe women saying they have been raped?
Any of these light blue?

http://www.sherwin-williams.com/homeowners/color/find-and-ex...
Fuji is one of the few companies out there that is very good at building lenses and does not offer a full-frame camera. I'm a big fan of smaller-than-full-frame sensors for a bunch of reasons I won't go into here, but I still love shooting with really good glass. This leaves out Nikon, Canon, Sony, etc because they put their best glass on full-frame only. Hopefully Fuji doesn't abandon APS-C in favor of their new medium-format system!
Trump's tone is abrasive, but do you remember the time he sucker punched someone he was yelling at instead of continuing to debate? Me neither. Despite what we want to infer from his personality, you don't get to his level by being out of control or incredibly impulsive. Besides, he's already started sabre rattling, but the threats are usually for the US to stop doing X, rather than to start doing Y. It creates a whole new set of incentives, and that's really the only way to change the world situation.
I managed to stack learning vim with normal on-boarding related slack by picking it up on my first day at my first coding job. IMO, one of the top ten decisions I've made in my life.
That's entirely not what I said.

People who say "You should trust what I say, because I said it. And not trust them, because I said it." holds little credence with me, regardless of who says it (activist, government, individual) - it's an appeal to authority or sympathy.

How much persecution are these people facing, these WikiLeaks activists, day to day?
So, say my political opinion is that people of a certain race shouldn't be allowed in this country, or something like that. In that scenario, my opinions favor a less diverse world, and calling me out publicly and making sure my ideas don't go mainstream would improve diversity.

So what do you find so ironic?
do you entertain the idea that he might not
The danger is that some customers don't buy at all.

Either because by the time March rolls around, they're already thinking about the newer phone due in October, or because the mere existence of the Edition (even if they can't afford it) makes the "cheaper" phone less appealing.

It's also hard to see how Apple could get terrific margins on a product that would sell at (say) 4x the price but at 1/20th the volume. They'd probably do just as well if their enthusiasts keep buying a top-end $1,000 SKU of the "regular" phone annually.
This makes me wonder how many people are using AJAX as an excuse for slow response times. If >500 ms isn't acceptable for a full page load then it shouldn't be acceptable for an AJAX REST call either. A page showing a spinner instead of content isn't any more useful to the user than a blank page.
Video game voice actors to strike on October 21st
Wikileaks was leaking stuff I agreed with.

Now it isn't.

Wikileaks is bad.
Did you know Obama is going to overturn the constitution and run for a third term?
I was a big fan of TrueCrypt before its still very explained end.

Glad we finally have a security audit of this fork. True/VeraCrypt has been essential in defending the rights and freedoms of many people. Hope this project continues.
Just to highlight the presence of mistaken information below (which others have already corrected further down in the thread):

Traditional public key cryptography is based on modular exponentiation and related number theoretic operations. Next-generation public key cryptography is based on elliptic curve operations. Both of these are highly vulnerable to quantum computers. The attempt to get people to adopt ECC will not protect well against quantum computers, which is one interpretation of why NSA is now recommending against putting resources into that transition.

There are other ideas for how to do public key cryptography that would (edit: seemingly, thanks n4r9) not be vulnerable to attacks from quantum computers. These techniques are called "post-quantum", and they're quite distinct from the elliptic curve techniques. A nice benefit of elliptic curve algorithms is that they normally have very small keys, compared to earlier schemes like RSA and Diffie-Hellman, while a disadvantage of post-quantum approaches is that they generally have extremely large keys. But that might become necessary for security, unfortunately.
It's worth noting that many prestigious genuine conferences do not reimburse speakers and charge them for a full price ticket as well.

For example, all the ACM conferences.

I actually like this - everyone contributes to the costs, and speakers are just attendees like everyone else.

I've seen people get extremely irate when they see this, saying it's a scam, but at many conferences speakers are just normal attendees like anyone else.
You may be happier subscribing to a feed of shipped products on Dell's website, rather than, say, sciencebulletin.org.
Any valid experiment would assume a prior p-value of 1 (otherwise, what are you hypothesizing?).

A null hypothesis does not have a probability. It is either the case, or it isn't.

Edit (response to your comment below) [speech restricted at the moment]:

"If you can't dispute it, you won't."

Edit2 (response to your comment/edit below):

It's just a fact. Same as the other simple facts I have stated that remain completely undisputed.

Why would you hypothesize an experiment where you already biased yourself (I assume p = 0.01? what?) on the outcome?

If your hypothesis is that you will observe no differences, then you have implicitly assigned a prior of 1. Any experimental design will be reducible to this fundamental comparison.

The p-value of an ongoing experiment is a measurement of the reproducibility of the [measurement of the predicted observations of the] hypothesis (many hypotheses are not true though; in those cases the p-values are not valid reproducibility measurements).

Edit3:

>Your misunderstanding in a nutshell is demonstrated by "if you can't dispute it, you won't", which you seem to think means "if you won't dispute it, you can't", in clear violation of Bayes's rule.

I think that that is your misunderstanding.
I'm not sure how that conflates with anything I wrote?

Also, while sedition is illegal in the US, seditious speech is not (there is clearly a gray area there).
I love my ceramic Mi5 Pro! Feels awesome and I can't imagine something else after using it. Sadly even Xiaomi probably won't build a ceramic phone again because of the manufacturing hassle.
Yeah. This one got flagged too. The censorship is strong these days.
He's saying that women tend not to vote libertarian, not that they shouldn't be allowed to vote.

Why misrepresent this (as so many have in this page) when we can all follow the link and read for ourselves?

More context:
" The 1920s were the last decade in American history during which one could be genuinely optimistic about politics. Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women — two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians — have rendered the notion of “capitalist democracy” into an oxymoron.

In the face of these realities, one would despair if one limited one’s horizon to the world of politics. I do not despair because I no longer believe that politics encompasses all possible futures of our world. In our time, the great task for libertarians is to find an escape from politics in all its forms — from the totalitarian and fundamentalist catastrophes to the unthinking demos that guides so-called “social democracy.”

So, he literally says he doesn't despair this.
The article you linked to does not make the claim you did. Why is your spin more credible than the claim that Clinton is a sulfurous demon who is motivated only by a hatred of Christianity?

But, again! This is an unproductive political argument. If you support Trump, your support for Wikileaks is entirely coherent. I'm not here to argue that people shouldn't support Trump (I hope those arguments are self-evident). I'm here to point out that people who oppose Trump should recognize the role Wikileaks is playing.
Mandatory XKCD link here

https://blog.xkcd.com/2010/05/03/color-survey-results/

This isn't just a comic - Randall Munroe ran a color naming survey on internet users. Native language was not collected. I assume native English speakers were over-represented but not universal.

Interestingly there was a slight gender difference in naming among respondents (see the second table). Is that perceptual or a cultural gender-specific difference in how often men or women talk about color?
What this article should have linked to: https://github.com/walmartlabs/react-ssr-optimization

> After peeling through the React codebase we discovered React’s mountComponent function. This is where the HTML markup is generated for a component. We knew that if we could intercept React's instantiateReactComponent module by using a require() hook we could avoid the need to fork React and inject our optimization. We keep a Least-Recently-Used (LRU) cache that stores the markup of rendered components (replacing the data-reactid appropriately).

> We also implemented an enhancement that will templatize the cached rendered markup to allow for more dynamic props. Dynamic props are replaced with template delimiters (i.e. ${ prop_name }) during the react component rendering cycle. The template is them compiled, cached, executed and the markup is handed back to React. For subsequent requests the component's render(..) call is short-circuited with an execution of the cached compiled template.
I've been working on this side project for the last 3 months, mostly nights and weekends. I've just implemented the latest bits for this initial MVP, including a new brand identity.

Would love to hear your thoughts. Particularly:

- Can you understand what is the project about in less than 10 seconds?

- Is the message clear enough about what a "Transparent Startup" is?

- Do you like the new Logo? What about the UI design and UX?
If you are using a Mac I recommend this little known gem: Graphic Converter. It supports hundreds of image formats. First used it on System 7, such a long time ago! It has of course been ported to MacOS X / OS X / macOS.

https://www.lemkesoft.de/en/products/graphicconverter/
So go teach CS :-)
Are your statement not a tad bit prejudiced?
How is Elm a Javascript flavor? it's not surprising that it gets a bad rap from a stateofjs flavors survey.
Elm is very much a competing language and ecosystem, it happens to be much better. I am certain I will still be interested in elm two years from now, the productivity gain is there to stay.
Why dismiss wikileaks?
I think this is too strong a statement. To have "no other dependencies" you would have to statically link in (1) the operating system (including device drivers) and (2) the hardware model, to be absolutely sure. Only virtual machines (possibly including Java VM) can give you such guarantee.
You're literally proving the grandparent comment's point- the best you can come up with is a baseless accusation.
Apple has invested hundreds of millions of dollars in their car project which they just cut back on significantly, so I'm not sure I buy the argument here that they're not wiling to try something new and risky because it's expensive. Just because their R&D failures aren't very publicly visible doesn't mean they don't exist.

I'm also not sure in what way they continue to regress. Back when Jobs was alive, the only Apple product I liked enough to buy was a MacBook Pro. I greatly preferred Android phones back at that time; the early iPads weren't that great; the original MacBook Air was incredibly expensive for the hardware you got; I could never even take the old colorful iMacs seriously.

Now with Cook at the helm, in addition to the MacBook I also have an iPhone 7 Plus, Apple Watch, Apple TV (4th gen.), I subscribe to Apple Music, I use and love a 5K iMac at work, and I'll probably be getting the new MBP whenever it's finally available. To me, Apple's product line is far stronger than it's ever been before.
Is that an issue again? It definitely used to be with wifi cards and graphics cards, but back when I was running a laptop (3 years ago), that had all been sorted. I would buy a laptop and use it without any special effort.
The 2016 Election
Keyword Planner Alternative: Keyword Hub
Of our material nature. We all have a spiritual nature as well, but mostly don't venture to discover it. It adds a very special dimension to an otherwise life with a "meh" appearance.

Basically, we are not alone. We can connect with our spiritual guides, get help, etc.
ARTFINDER:+Careless+Lee+Clement+-+Lee+Clement+CarelessAcrylic+on+Canvas©+Le
would things go better if the US severed diplomatic relations with countries like Saudi Arabia? Running a country is hard.
It is interesting how these releases were timed to start right after Bernie Sanders conceded.
Wait, so because a political opponent identified him (and 2 others) as the weakest and most unpalatable candidates, that means media outlets were "instructed" to prop him up?
Massively off topic but I hate the BBC's recent penchant for using the main event as backdrop for a piece to camera. Do other countries have to put up with this ridiculous trend?
>“We do have some information about the Republican campaign,” Mr. Assange said on Fox News. “I mean, from a point of view of an investigative journalist organization like WikiLeaks, the problem with the Trump campaign is it’s actually hard for us to publish much more controversial material than what comes out of Donald Trump’s mouth every second of the day.”

>http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/08/26/assange-trumps-ever...