skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
An interesting analogy to this is Stalin and the film Ivan the Terrible. Stalin commissioned the film because he admired Tsar Ivan, and thought of himself in his mold. His version of Ivan was a great man who was surrounded by corrupt boyars intending to sell out Russia, and only he has the strength to unite the country against them. Ivan is loved by the common people, but hated by the sophisticated, "europeanized" nobility, who are traitors.

Stalin loved Part I, but was unhappy with Part II, since it didn't fit his myth of Ivan. He banned the film and nearly had the director, Sergei Eisenstein executed.
Map your brain with Deep Learning
I suppose you didn't have to, but most people did. They had catered lunches 3x / week, so that was already establishing a time for lunch.
> Even when behavior is mostly learned rather than hard-coded, the ability to learn itself must be hard-coded. Such code occupies hundreds of megabytes of data. Consider the first generation of software for self-driving cars. NVIDIA’s deep-learning drivers for self driving cars utilize “27 million connections and 250 thousand parameters.”5 Good programmers try to restrict their functions to no more than 6 parameters when writing code. Thus, a driving system with learning ability depends on over 40,000 programmatic functions.

Obviously the author has completely misunderstood what is meant by "parameters" in this context. The parameters here are those of a neural network and thus they are a result of, not a precondition for the learning process. Instead, he should strictly use the implementation of the neural network for comparison, whose uncompressed human-readable size is probably going to be almost small enough to fill into his size constraints.

And that is assuming there is not a sufficiently good algorithm for learning animal behaviors that is much simpler than CNNs.
It's Not Impostor Syndrome If You Really Do Suck
MIT tool takes 3D printing beyond prototyping
> I would answer in ways I wanted to be viewed, not how I actually act.

Do you know if it was an official MBTI test or something else? In keeping with the "no wrong personality" mantra, I found the test questions to be fairly neutral. By that I mean neither option would be perceived as socially unacceptable, just different personal preferences.
Caution and scepticism are important. However, you imply that teaching and science are bad. That way lies creationism and magical thinking via truthy plausibilist hokum to end up teaching them to be conspiracy theorists
I did look up recent findings and they were meager. I followed your advice and looked up "Complex Traint Analysis." It is also quite meager. Were you able to find something close to 10mb? If you did, link please. I would expect that that category of genes would get a technical term alongside with "regulatory" and "encoding" genes the moment enough of them surfaced.
Ok, so you get a call from Apple that tells you to write a blog post and they will restore your account. You submit the draft blog post. Then, a respected Apple SVP comes out and calls you a criminal and Apple doesn't reply to the draft. What do you do?
Xe+tải+Hyundai+1+tấn,+1,25+tấn+nâng+tải+2,4+tấn
Customer support, personal intelligence assistants, virtual "friends", game characters, toys (software and "real" ones) are all things that come to mind first.

Also, possibly medical applications? Eliza (the first known chatbot) was built to simulate a Rogerian psychologist and was quite convincing for its time (1960s)...

What else would you use it for?
I used to work at the Sun offices. Back then, everyone actually got an office. I shared mine as an intern for a while, which I actually kind of preferred, since we were both pretty quiet and good at recognizing when we needed to focus vs talk. I was hired on, he went back to school, so I had a private office after that, which was the norm.

That was the last time I ever had a private office. Funny, it was my must entry level position, right out of school, where I had a private office. Unfortunately the industry trended away from it over time.

Sun did manage open offices well back then, though. There were a number of "drop in" centers that were essentially large open offices. However, Sun ran them carefully. There was a "quiet room" of workstations with no phones, and a general room where people made noise. Occasionally, it would fill up, and someone from sales or another field would figure it was ok to have cell conversations as long as he or she did it in a muted voice. The only thing that saved that room was the office manager, who pretty much had no tolerance for it. If she saw people doing this (and she checked pretty regularly), she'd explain very firmly that the couldn't do it. She didn't care who they were, either, the chain of command really had her back on this.

Unfortunately, open offices rarely work this way. They tend to just chuck everyone into a big room. I don't like earplugs or headphones as a solution, because I don't like it when people can see my back and my screen and I'm unaware that they're standing behind me.

Ultimately, I'd prefer to let the market solve this one. If employees prefer not to work in open offices, or in high tech in general, they can and should choose to work at other companies and/or in other fields. This is, yet again, why I am so opposed to work visas that allow employers to decide what immigrants are allowed to study, what field they're allowed to pursue as a profession, what they are allowed to work on, what work conditions they are allowed to work in, and where they are allowed to live, as a condition of living in the United States. Honestly, I think that if you just gave the workforce basic choice, a lot of this would get sorted out on its own - it's propped up by a system that gives employers monumental power over a large portion of their workforce (if you risk getting deported if you quit your job or try to change fields, you aren't free, and this is reflected in our working conditions).
your first and fifth points are an oxymoron. Obviously nobody wants their dishwasher, washing machine, fridge, microwave, to put up messages, "is it okay to update now?" - can you imagine dozens of devices in people's homes doing that?

so your first point, automatically updates, implies your fifth point, administered by vendor, should be "yes". (Not "no", as you've put it.)

Further, I would like you to think more broadly about infrastructure. I think every person's home should have a local network called "shitty backdoored and malicious IoT crap". The question is how to administer that network, what its topology should be, how these devices should be able to receive information from the Internet, and in general what their capabilities should be and the way in which they should be firewalled off.

Having these devices on users' home wifi via their home router (the status quo) is obviously wrong and insufficient. I'm afraid your checklist is also, therefore, wrong and insufficient.

so, think harder at the architectural level, please. the existence of IoT stuff is obviously good. (as in, obviously there can be a benefit to devices being able to be connected - in the abstract, not based on today's very flawed infrastructural and architectural choices) the infrastructure we have for it today is obviously insufficient. I don't have a comprehensive solution in mind or anything but it is worth giving serious attention to by people who have spent years on the subject.

today, they are failing. It's not that people are ignoring their advice: they just don't have any. They've thrown up their hands and given lists like yours, which are not a comprehensive solution and are not even internally consistent. They need to think outside the box and propose completely new infrastructure.

there needs to be different infrastructure in place, not an SOP for the current infrastructure. we need better security baked into the topology and architecture of how the devices are connected.
Crafting a Hero Slider with SliderPro.js
Samsung – our business is exploding! This is a minor brand disaster but as others have said, consumers have short memories.

Look at Toyota's unintended acceleration issues as a good example. Has it really impacted them many months on?
Ahem, no. The NSA should spend their time protecting systems and strengthening encryption instead of this nonsense. Yes, yes, coding breaking is their mandate. I have a new mission.
It's not the first one addressing these problems.

Nix and ied (which borrowed from Nix) got these problems pretty much solved.

I don't understand what spoke against these approaches?

I mean okay, nix has its own language, which is probably a turnoff for JS devs, but ied?
Why do you not allow google to index discussion threads?

Sometimes I can remember the comments on an article, but not the article itself. Unfortunately I can't search google using comment text, because Reddit doesn't allow google to index its comments.
The first case is always legitimate.
I agree with a lot of this.

I don't disagree with the fact that it's not necessarily super effective because the distributions of personalities of people are not bimodal, as would be ideal for this simplistic sort of classification. It's also unlikely to be supremely effective at clustering in that way because the design of the metric wasn't really data driven in any systemic way. It's not even like someone used principal component analysis to really establish that the four classifiers are reasonably orthogonal. It's probably not super obvious/trivial to find human language-friendly orthogonal aspects of personality that are each bimodal, but I imagine the surveys could be improved informed by better data science.

It's certainly a compression algorithm, as are all classification based metrics based on answers to multiple questions, and I'm not arguing it's the most effective one around. However I think before making claims like it has no "external validity" the degree to which it might have it should actually be tested with reasonable methodology and I'm offering something that can absolutely be tested scientifically. There's nothing impossible about having some people take the test and having others who know them try to classify them without the results and see how well the two coincide. It's also possible to evaluate the degree to which people can decompress the data. You can set it up where people have equal time spent with two people of each MBTI and see how well they can guess their answers to the original survey questions with additional knowledge of the MBTI as opposed to without it. It won't establish an upperbound for how useful an MBTI is but it will help gauge a lower bound and I'm pretty confident the lower bound will be higher than that of a zodiac.

I imagine we can design a better classification, probably with even the same survey questions, but just because a metric wasn't well-designed doesn't mean the information it provides is meaningless.
It's also very overpriced. I just moved into a new apartment and I am paying 9€/sqm cold in a very central location. This is very cheap. 11-14€ is more realistic, but even with utilities included you would never have to pay 24€/sqm.
If you look at ruby there is "gem" that you could equal to "npm". On top of that there is "bundler" that is you could equal to "yarn".

It is the same pattern.
> Biology is one of the last fields of science adopting the tech revolution by switching from analog to digital analysis.

Barricelli was running experiments about digital organisms back in the early 50's right before the identification of the structure of DNA. Quite literally sharing time with atomic/hydrogen bomb calculations. I find it a bit tough to press onwards when sweeping statements like the above are made as a build up to the argument.
I think you might misunderstand just how love is stronger than anger and hate. Love is reinforced by interaction with all types of others. Anger and hate can be socially reinforced but usually at most tribally against another group. It has a more limited virality because eventually it hits a limit.

Feelings are heavily interpreted. Some people find sexual stimulation painful, not just physically, but emotionally. In the end, all feelings exist as an interpretation inside the mind, and we know for sure that we can reinforce them through conditioning and other methods so that the full stack of causes which might initially cause a feeling aren't necessary to recreate it. Just a scent or a memory can be enough to evoke the full force of an emotion.

Violence isn't enjoyable for everyone, even simulated in movies or games. For a lot of people, putting it inside a safe context is a way to address something terrible and cope with the realities of violence, what causes it, and even find some common ground to empathize with the people who choose violence in real life.

Love is stronger than violence because we've seen the benefits and chosen to make it stronger. It's infinitely reinforcable and non-destructive. A system built around love can survive better than a system built on hate. As thinking beings, we don't just reactively respond to emotion. We build reinforcement systems into family, friends, culture, work, play and more, and all of these systems feed back into our behavior. Feeling good is just the beginning.
The most hilarious example of this I've seen is a forbes article where they managed to dig up a picture of Warren Buffet with a psychopath-like expression on his face for some type of investigation a subsidiary company he invested in was under.
WordPress the app is inherently unsecure in many ways. A full overview would be lengthy, but an obvious example is the general architectural reliance on self-modifying code, which requires write access to executable files on your server (this can be disabled with some difficulty, but this makes updates difficult and completely breaks many popular plugins. Doing so is not encouraged or really properly supported by WP devs). This isn't the only problem, but it's a large enough one, and most importantly, it's by design.

Auth code might look OKish (haven't looked closely recently), but any general vulnerability in any part of the app as a whole or in any 3rd-party plugins potentially opens you up to data breaches.
you don't need RStudio. It can be run in R console even.
Compressorhead homepage: https://compressorhead.rocks/
This is a huge leap forward for the JavaScript community—probably more than many people will realize right away.

I loved Bundler's deterministic builds but chafed against the Ruby limitation of only having a single version of a dependency at once. npm solved this problem elegantly, but still struggles with non-determinism. I had resigned myself to thinking that maybe these were just fundamental tradeoffs in package management that could never be resolved.

Then I had the opportunity to use Cargo, the package manager for Rust. It synthesized what, in my mind, are the best features of npm and Bundler into a single package manager, with terrific speed to boot.

Yarn looks like it will be Cargo for JavaScript. After Cargo improved on many of the great ideas of npm, those ideas are returning to help improve the JavaScript ecosystem. Cross-pollination at its best.

This also highlights a shrewd move on the part of npm: a clear decoupling between the npm registry and client, with a well-defined protocol between the two. The strength of Node is in the staggering size of its ecosystem; how those bits end up on disk is an implementation detail. This smart separation allows for this kind of experimentation on the client side, without causing the ecosystem fragmentation that happens when a new package manager requires a new registry.

I'm also happy to see that a significant amount of work has already gone into the governance model. Despite the largest contributors being Facebook employees, it looks like they've really outdone themselves making sure this is a community-run project. A BSD license, no PATENTS file, and an Ember/Rust RFC process[1]; this has all the hallmarks of a community open source project. That's critical for open infrastructure projects like this, and they've nailed it.

[1]: https://github.com/yarnpkg/rfcs

I'm very much looking forward to using Yarn in my own projects because it looks like it solves a lot of real problems I encounter every day. Thanks for all the hard work!
Lots of comments here mention the use of MBTI in the workplace. This is such a bad idea! As someone who has taken the test many times over the years, I have a lot of problems with the system in general, especially when applied to the workplace. That's not to say that the idea of personality types is invalid, but I have often seen them misapplied (and overapplied) in practice.

In my experience, Gallup's Strengthsfinder system is much better suited to workplace environments. It's backed by solid research, and I really like its core philosophy: everyone has natural strengths, and building off those strengths will lead to better outcomes than trying to compensate for personal weaknesses. As long as companies understand that it isn't a litmus test for suitability -- teams should have a diversity of strengths or they will have blind spots -- it can actually be a great tool for understanding management and team dynamics.

For personal development, I prefer the Enneagram system. I've found each type's "levels of development" to be incredibly helpful in pinpointing my own type, and overall I have a much better "fit" with my type than in MBTI. As opposed to Strengthsfinder, the Enneagram system is mainly useful for identifying patterns in behavior and understanding motivations. Not such a great business tool, except perhaps at the executive level.
Does the presence of dark matter and dark energy imply other 'dark' properties. Consider 'dark' intelligence - I think our presidential candidates qualify as vast repositories of this - you can't observe any intelligent speech but you know there must have been some - otherwise how could they get to where they are today?
Fair, and good response. I was kind of just venting about my general dislike for Go there….

I do think Go has a decent niche for backend services similar to Erlang but with a much easier learning curve (and more available talent). Sounds like you're actually using the right tool for the right job.
Am I correct in understanding Yarn works similar to Ruby's bundler?
so, where are the packages stored? how is this more secure than npm? how does this solve the leftpad problem?
No one knows what happened between the phone call and Apple's press release. So we can't make judgment on that.

That said, I was amazed how that guy from Apple was being so patient with this guy being so immature. The Apple guy was trying his best to sort this out, but for every word he said, this Dash guy would keep complaining. This phone call could have ended in 30 seconds but took over 7 minutes because all this guy did was complain (which I think he did for the purpose of making this recording), and I don't even know what you would get from complaining that way when the other person was trying to help you. I would have been pissed if I was that Apple guy.
At least speaking for myself, the npm package ecosystem is critical and I wouldn't want to do anything to undermine the integrity of the npm registry.
Just a quick flashback to President George Bush circa January 2004 [1]:

Our second goal is to develop and test a new spacecraft, the crew exploration vehicle, by 2008, and to conduct the first manned mission no later than 2014.

[1]http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/54868main_bush_trans.pdf
> In the midwest, I am 90% sure that the reason roads break apart is the freeze and thaw cycles in winter.

On the other hand, the passenger lanes on freeways (where long-haul trucks generally cruise) sure wear out faster. I think it's more that freeze/thaw and snow plows exacerbate and accelerate ongoing wear and tear.
TumbleBit: An Untrusted Bitcoin-Compatible Anonymous Payment Hub
Unfortunately I did not purchase through a marketplace, back then I think they were less of a standard.

Thanks for your opinion! I will consider "shaming" him if he keeps ignoring me for another 2 weeks and report him to paypal.
This is a really odd claim.

A Venus settlement requires flying cities. I have a hard time imagining how anyone thinks that's easier than a greenhouse on Mars.

Wiki says:

> Furthermore, water, in any form, is almost entirely absent from Venus. The atmosphere is devoid of molecular oxygen and is primarily carbon dioxide. In addition, the visible clouds are composed of corrosive sulfuric acid and sulfur dioxide vapor.
Humans are the apex predator for the entire globe. Or at least one of the very small number of apex predators. There are a few others that are preyed on by nothing else, including Hippos. As far as I know nobody hunts Hippos for their meat or other products. They're just too damn scary.

Some other predators have reciprocal predator/prey relationships with other predators. Like lions and hyenas that will eat each other if given the chance but generally prefer less dangerous meals.
(Thought experiment) I think its easier to frame what that legal structure should be if we agree on what Profit actually means. If I define profit as: Provide goods and / or services people want in a sustainable fashion -- does that impact the story? E.g. if its not profitable (generally), is it sustainable? (I think no). But the converse is clearly not true as profits can be sought at the expense of something less obvious (say, environment).
Hmm. I'd like to understand this, but I have questions. I've imagined that we could do a lot more science with a human and some basic instruments than we could with a billion dollar Rover sent every ten years. I mean, just to sample a rock probably takes a week. A geologist on site could do that in an hour.

Historically, when we can do something much faster we tend to do things with that we didn't do when it was very slow. For example when it took months to cross the country, it was a once in a lifetime thing for some and most never did it. Now we do it all the time, and generations of West Coast students have seen the Smithsonian.

I think that there will be more value in sending humans to Mars than just hubris. I think we will learn a lot more about our cosmic origins, about the value of life and our healthy planet, and about ourselves as a species and culture. In fact, I think sending man to Mars is a key factor in getting us to appreciate this planet and the destruction we're causing here. I don't think Musk's end goal is to leave Earth, but to save it by making us value it again. Perhaps, on this scale, for the first time.

To me, that's a lot more than just hubris. What do you think of all that?
That is on 11.0. AFAIK it wasn't in prior releases.
I used to run a few miles a day, almost every day for about a year. During that time I had runners high exactly 1 time. It was truly amazing - I felt like I could run forever. Had no muscle pain, no shortness of breath, it was like running on air.
I only stopped because I was at the end of the run, and normally I would have collapsed, but I could have kept going that day no problem. I have never been able to repeat it.

I wonder if I would have eventually died like a horse if I kept going? ;)
I would think long and hard about the following questions:

What are your expectations?

What is the minimum possible that could be done to meet your expectations?

What deficiencies currently exist that are blocking you?

Once you have this written down, only then should you approach the other party. Remember YOU think it is "messy" "lacks docs", however others may think it is fine. You will not win any friends by demanding someone does more work that they don't consider to be worthwhile.

If you have no leverage, then you are asking for a favor.

Be nice, be friendly and courteous. Try to see the other person's viewpoint.

Good luck in your negotiation.
They could just rebrand. Here in Japan, Korean companies are unpopular so they're just branded "Galaxy" with no "Samsung" to be seen.