skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You are correct. It seems like they don't plan to use them intentionally to carry nukes. They could perhaps be fitted with one and possibly wire it into the self-destruct mechanism, but that would take a lot of work, I'd think.

They do carry a bomb, though- it's not meant for combat, but could be abused for such to make the entire plane a bomb carrying device, if it were taken over:

"Granted it is removable, but they also carry, as it was described to me, a 2000 lb class (or maybe more reasonably it was 500#, but the 2k figure seems to stick out in my memory for some reason) HE warhead in the spine for range control/destruction purposes if anything goes awry. Long story short, it would take a lot more money and a lot more testing to ever make them combat capable."

http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=27741
Interview with WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
yes I've heard about other people in your case. I probably shouldn't have overstated that point. Do you eat enough fat? It's easy not to eat enough I find.
Google is paying manufacturers to use Google search as the default search engine and to exclude other search engines. The EU sees Google's dominant position in mobile OSs being used to bundle their search engine.

It's hard to deny that there's a stinking parallel to Microsoft paying PC manufacturers to bundle IE and exclude other browsers, which resulted in the famous anti-trust suit.
A license change certainly shouldn't happen lightly, or without consulting the community. In this case, it looks like an extensively considered decision with substantial community feedback.

And patent lawsuits hurt, so as reasons to change licenses go, that seems like a pretty good one.
Not necessarily talks by professors, but scientific papers published in respectable journals or on NCBI.
At competitive levels the physiques of bodybuilders and powerlifters are VERY different.
The problem with selling for consumers is simple: it's hard to achieve credibility. On the one hand, anti-virus software , that we all bought, sucked. So we don't have much trust in security vendors.

On the other, after hearing about the crazy stuff hackers do, like stuxnet or the more trivial daily privacy news, make people think the task is impossible. And even what's possible - it's hard to quantify benefits.

Combine that with network effects , the marketing power of free apps and default apps, and the complexity of it all - it's natural that most users don't the time/money to spend on this.
I don't know what else to say other than it's well-done and extremely cool. A+++, would click again. Man, not a square or cubic inch of that module went to waste.

That said, the page does frequently reload "due to a problem" on my iPad Air 2. Haven't tried on a non-mobile device yet.
What provision of the MIT License allows it? By default it is prevented in a copyrighted work. I don't think the sublicense clause covers it.
An under that they're all iOS
Does 'sublicensing' imply a change in the license terms? I wouldn't think so, but IANAL.
If the officer doesn't get knocked out, there is a loaded gun on the table under the control of a uniformed thug. For some reason, that scares me a lot more.
I'm not suggesting that it's perfect. I'm just suggesting that from a legal point of view, the current license grants enough permissions that they don't have to have unanimous agreement from every copyright holder; the scenario painted in the linked email couldn't happen as written.

(They may still want unanimous agreement, either to have more code under the new license or to confirm community consensus.)
In Los Angeles I see so many cops driving black mustang cars, a predator style car. As if they enjoy their predator status and want to express and enforce their masculinity on the community. Every time I see a cop car it makes me nervous just by the sight of it.

I think its time we give them Pink colored bug beetle cars. That will remind them they are here to protect the community, not be a hero in an action movie.
Apple comes with Google Search as the default, and several other options. So it's a moot point.
$ sudo apt update

$ sudo apt upgrade

That's a lot less than 100 characters.

I haven't experienced any upgrade that has broken my system.

At worst, once or twice I shut down while upgrading (poweroff bypasses any protection I guess) and so I needed to do "sudo dpkg --configure -a" to fix an application.
> Not necessarily talks by professors, but scientific papers published in respectable journals or on NCBI

well the professor in the talk has published dozens of papers so it's a good way to start. I'm not going to provide you with a literature review sorry :)
Credit card is probably a reasonable lookup most of the time. When (most) people open a tab, they'll have to hand one over briefly.

While name collisions happen, within a segment this specific, it's probably rare. If you were trying to do it across all Walmart stores, it would be a constant problem.
The whole reason that this license change is coming up is that some people in the project (and I assume Apple as well) want to provide some level of protection from patent infringement cases for the users of LLVM. The ability to sublicense doesn't help here because the patent clause in the Apache 2.0 license would only apply to the patents owned by you, the one who is doing the sub-licensing. They want these protections to apply to the patents of any of the authors of LLVM, which of course cannot be done without their consent.
Maybe Bezos (owner of WaPo and Blue Origins) is trying to stir it up? /tinfoil
Gears of War 4 Trailer, Prologue, Release Date Xbox One S
(Use $14.5B)
Why we don't need a 'Netflix for Education'
Apple isn't forcing OEMs to include their bundled software.

This reads very much like the EU vs. MS for the exact same reasons.
The only risk being that you could get similar results quicker and with less effort.

Anyway I'm with you! Enjoy the ride, and don't let fitness suck the life out of you.
Absolutely. Air squats before real squats get blood flowing into the muscle, you "rehearse" the move a few times to remind yourself of the form, etc. That's what reduces the possibility of injury.

If you think about it from an evolutionary perspective, a warmup to increase performance makes no sense - you wouldn't have time to stretch first if you were about to be eaten by a hungry mammoth - the body would want to jump straight to peak power and if you get injured it's better than being dead...
Justin Kan is good at Snapchat: Startups I didn't know about
It's never fine to relicense works of others, unless you have a CLA giving you that explicit right.
"Additional restrictions" can be funny. You may recall the FSF's position that the app store EULA placed "additional restrictions" on the GPL, a position that was and remains controversial.

In this case, it is a little harder to understand OpenBSD's interpretation of additional restrictions because they haven't listed their objections in any centralized place, but from reading around, they seem to believe:

* "You must cause any modified files to carry prominent notices stating that You changed the files" is an additional restriction
* "any Contribution intentionally submitted for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and conditions of this License" is an additional restriction
* The sheer length and complexity of the Apache license suggests to them there are other additional restrictions buried in there somewhere
Are there any peer reviewed (or not) evidence that the keto diet provides additional weight losses beyond that which can be explained by calorie deficiencies?
Shotspotter.com
what was the second one you mentioned?
I'm saying that I don't see a legal obstacle to Microsoft doing that. There are other potential obstacles, such as reputation damage.

So far, open source projects act like copyright either requires unanimous agreement among the copyright owners to make changes, or each contributor has copyright only in their specific contribution (so, in practice, you need unanimous agreement). That's simply wrong for joint works, and joint works are defined as works meant to be combined together to make one work (the alternative being a collective work, where the parts are simply combined into a collection, does follow the "each contributor has copyright in just their contribution" model).

Copyright law is based on certain assumptions, like "if the co-authors get into an argument, it will be about how to divvy up royalties, and there will be a contract involved." Another is "co-authors work together at the same time, and know each other." Those assumptions are wrong for open source projects.
> Yes, they don't have the same market share

That's the answer, full stop. Like it or not, the rules are different for you when you have the majority of market share, and this has been true in both the EU and the US despite their different approaches to antitrust regulation.
To write it in pure SQL would ensure the single query you're looking for and be less to type:

update records
set a = b + 30
where type = 'X'
You're right of course; except for one minor nit, the crack you hear is the sound of the bullet. The sound you hear from the rifle is a thump sound. Indeed most infantry soldiers are trained to estimate distance to a shooter by the delay between the crack sound above your head and the thump that follows; 3 seconds is approximately 1km or 1100 yards.
All companies who ship Samba in products use GPLv3. There are a lot of companies shipping Samba (one went out with a successful IPO this week). Thus your FUD is disproved.
All these arbitrary fines handed out without trials looks a lot like taxation by fiat to this cynic.
Look, no. That code is totally solid, trust us a little will you?
> Painting the situation as "corporate contributer-wannabes" and "IANAL but let's do it anyway" is loaded language that seems intended to bring up negative tropes.

Theo de Raadt said neither phrase.
Police work is much less dangerous than many civilian jobs, yet the police are paid to assume risk.
I think the balance is off, and society as a whole is suffering, because civilians who generally are nonviolent are much less capable of taking on that risk than the tainted police officers who are paid to do so.
Beat big brother. But certainly didn't beat crime.
> The other side of what? That SpaceX isn't a newcomer competing with monopolists?

Okay they are a newcomer, but I don't know that ULA is the only other player out there. The article sure sounds like it, but it seems a bit odd that nobody else ever develops anything space-related for the US government.

And you forget the second part of my question where I ask for the other side of the story. According to the article, SpaceX had to sue to be accredited, which is weird if there is a normal accreditation process so I am assuming ULA (or someone else?) was causing trouble. Telling the story from only SpaceX's side is always incomplete, now matter how right they might be.
Ultimately this type of behavior erodes all trust in law enforcement in the communities where this kind of policing is practiced. A vicious cycle is amplified whereby residents learn to put little trust in police and in turn police decide to use more and more force, believing those (untrusting) residents would use violence against them.

As a side note, why don't police approach dangerous criminals the way radiological workers approach "hot" material. I'm not sure how "danger" should be enumerated but I'd imagine it decreases with the square of the distance. Unless there are other bystanders nearby who might be hurt, closing the distance to suspects seems to be one of the more dangerous things an officer could do. Seems like containing someone and letting them cool off is safer for both parties.
Might be technically a fallacy, but:

- General problem-solving is a skill, guy seems to have it and it does apply to fitness research

- His success in various fields undoubtedly require perseverance, which also is a relevant trait.
Elon heard something: https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/774153847371501569

Although I also think sabotage such a weak theory.
Well to cite an actual IP attorney [0], yes. A sublicense means that you (the licensee / sublicensor) grant somebody else (the sublicensee) the right to use the software, and you can do it under any terms you are permitted by the grant of sublicense.

The MIT/NCSA do place some restrictions on sublicenses ("subject to the following conditions") but I don't see any reason why the Apache license would present a problem as the choice of sublicense.

I am not a lawyer, I am not your lawyer, this is not legal advice.

[0] http://danashultz.com/blog/2010/10/19/what-is-a-sublicense-a...
Hmmm, after Australis changed the UI, e10s has begun to enlarge the memory footprint, XUL was ditched for Chrome extensions, and support for encrypted media extensions was added, I didn't think Firefox had much left that it could do to become more like Chrome, but I guess Mozilla is going to keep surprising us.
It's a bit disingenuous that the guide states that it's free, but then the second half of it is paid only, and that while there are a lot of citations, especially in the second part of the guide, the author isn't really in a place to explain to someone how to gain muscle except for some personal experience (1 year of research, and some time weight lifting) and instead must make an appeal on the basis of accomplishments, which basically just makes this like "another blogger's personal journey to weightlifting and so can you", albeit with some scientific research to back it up.

The thing I would worry about the most is that the guide is made to seem better than others because it has some cited studies, but who's to say that those studies are statistically valid (which is somewhat hard to come by in the field of nutrition and fitness) or that the author didn't pick certain articles to back certain points and pick others to back others?
Stay tuned: https://github.com/openimages/dataset/issues/3
> It's projecting the intent of the tool makers (and merchants) onto the tools themselves (screwdriver is for unscrewing screws, vegetable knives is for cutting vegetables) like if they were unbreakable laws of physics.

As a lapsed physicist (now developing software for electrical engineering) I am often bemused by this sort of thing. But after some thought I concluded that it is to some extent an artefact of education. In my own field I often see people generate over complicated solutions for the same reasons. It seems to me that the physicist's way of working is best: assume that everything is an instance of the same type until proven otherwise, resist the temptation to create new entities and explanations, generalise. But my colleagues with engineering degrees have exactly the opposite behaviour: treat every object and situation as special.
This is not wrong, but it's also not any more right than stronglifts.
Anecdotically you'll find lots of testimonies (including mine) arguing that it's much easier to control hunger on keto. I don't have food craving since I started and I get to eat as much as I want. So it's a lot easier to not overeat. Scientifically it's well known that eating carbs (especially fast acting carbs like sugar) triggers storage of fat.
I tried Cyanogenmod for a while and wasn't pleased with the situation of Android in general, notably the arrangements with Google Play. I used Fdroid for a bit (which I appreciated), but soon ended up abandoning Android altogether, for a bundle of reasons.

Here's one of the most relevant perspectives on Google's Android I've read, titled Google's Iron Grip on Android: http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/10/googles-iron-grip-on-...
It hangs for me in Chrome and works in Safari on MacOs Sierra. It uses all my CPU hand is initially very unresponsive. But after loading clicking the steps (play icon) works well. Cool to see all the control panels and subsystems.
Unfortunately I'm as clueless on this as you - I'm mostly going on the papers that my professor suggests (cs165 and cs265 at harvard, the syllabus is public). Though VLDB and cidrdb seems like two conferences that seem to publish the most famous papers. Eventually you start learning the names of the authors, etc.
The value/type of the stolen property is normally what starts to make it a felony if it exceeds a states maximum for being a misdemeanor. If the value is around 50k then it is a felony and jail time should be served for the crimes committed. Normally a misdemeanor tops out at $250-$500, after that it starts getting into different levels of felony, normally 1st being the lowest and increasing in minimum probation or sentencing, fines, etc. that have to be paid as the level increases.

Talk with your attorney on Monday to get the ball rolling. Hopefully you will be able to have your attorney prosecute the guy, but while your at it be sure to file charges after talking with your attorney with the local police and FBI.
Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12489055 (18 days ago, 210 comments)
Court says Obama's internet transition can go forward
Right. I'll help you figure out that you are the one who is wrong.

Millions of people run Ubuntu and can NOT upgrade it at all.

The cause: After a few kernel updates, the /boot partition gets full. Then all future updates simply fail because of disk full. (the updater never clean the old stuff).

The issue is well known and well documented. For instances, read these two questions which are over 100k views each:

https://askubuntu.com/questions/171209/my-boot-partition-hit...

https://askubuntu.com/questions/298487/not-enough-free-disk-...

And here the magic one liner command you need to fix it:

sudo apt-get purge $(dpkg -l linux-{image,headers}-"[0-9]*" | awk '/ii/{print $2}' | grep -ve "$(uname -r | sed -r 's/-[a-z]+//')")
Um, I'm curious now at what stage anyone would think security analysis would ever become obsolete.
That's not a boycott. That's a capitulation.
What makes you think of all the things ignoring the licenses (citation needed) is the one that made github flourish?
OpenBSD's been around for a long time, it would be unwise to dismiss these concerns, especially considering they've demonstrated this has happened before.

LLVM/clang was recently imported into OpenBSD and is being brought into shape to potentially replace GCC, having OpenBSD developers eyes on a codebase has also historically been a good thing.. I think a future without their input will be bleak.
> SpaceX IS the newcomer and underdog

Woah, sorry. I never said they weren't.

> which was created in 2006

That sounds rather new to me, considering that space tech has been around since what, the 60s? If someone told me SpaceX was originally started in 2006 I'd be only slightly surprised, but I'd figure it just took years to attract expertise and set the whole thing up before we start hearing about it.

All I'm asking is for the other side of the story. ULA is being painted as evil here and no matter how true every word from SpaceX's side is, I would always like to read ULA's comments on the matter.
I was just trying to get rid of play music and play newsstand yesterday. Most of the stuff they include is wasted space. It's particularly frustrating since I'm always running out of internal storage and most apps are difficult to put on the SD card.
When I was there I was taken into the VAB with a group. The SRBs for the next Shuttle launch were there. Nobody else was in there. "Security" consisted of a guy asking if I had any lighters or matches.
"europe and China both likely reject China's market economy status"

Did you even read what you posted? The above does not make any sense and you repeated it here without any correction anyway.

Googling or not you don't seem to realize that China is not currently recognized as a market economy by both Europe and US per China's WTO accession agreement. That particular clause is going to sunset this year. After the sunset if Europe and US follow the WTO rules they will no longer be able to use "substitute country" in determining fair prices in anti-dumping investigations. This is a positive for China. Even if Europe and US refuse to change it is still just status quo, or in your words, "non-event".

The other commenter's critique on your hyperinflation claim is entirely valid. Calling him incorrect without giving your "correct" definition does not make it so.

Also self-plagiarism is a thing. Sure this is only an internet forum but unless you are hell bent on propaganda please refrain from copying yourself verbatim without at least making a reference to your previous posts so people don't waste time repeatedly refuting your identical claims.
Nobody would debate that the A-10 is a beast. If you are going to be raked with ground fire it's where you want to be. But we have to look at the entire mission profile. The A-10 is slow, making it more susceptible to shoulder-fired missiles, causing it to have to fly higher on the way to and from the mission. Higher means greater exposure to radar-directed weapons, not the A-10's strong game. Or it can fly lower, reducing its range and requiring airfields closer to the fight, airfields which are more difficult to protect. Flying low also reduces tanker options. There are a hundred factors. The evaluation of weapon systems really does require a committee.
Apple has a market share of 100% of the iOS platform.
The numbers from recent Gallup poll [1] for attending church at least monthly: Texas 62%, California 47%. I would guess that Austin is considerably below the statewide number (as would be say San Jose or San Fransisco).

[1] http://www.gallup.com/poll/181601/frequent-church-attendance...
Gillmor Gang Live 10.01.16
ahlatimer gave you the southern perspective, and for the Canadian side, my experience says that a store will take your foreign currency at (approximately) the exchange rate, but you'll get local currency as change. As you get further from the border, a vendor will still take your funny money, but "at par": my $20 U. S. buys me $20 Canadian in goods. Which currently means I, a holder of U. S. currency, get screwed by 28%. That's the penalty for not finding a Canadian ATM or using a credit card.

On the U. S. side, it would appear, according to signs at the cash registers, that many U. S. vendors work in a similar manner. The registers signs disappear within tens of miles of the border.
I think it will be very interesting how the major broadcasters/content producers do with Nielsen Total Audience Measurement going live. Remember all these media execs make the live or die calls off those media ratings and ad sales. For over a decade Nielsen has been discounting online viewership. Yes they were covering DVR, but it felt half assed. A lot of people blamed Jericho getting cut because they questioned nielsens numbers.
It's true that gains can be had quickly. I've seen athletes go from Charles on the left, to bodybuilder on the right, in a 3-6 month timeframe. These are athletes who would get drug tested, so I'm pretty sure it's all natural.

Although I think it's yet to be proven Julian can make you look like Charles though. Achieving gains is a bit different than building a well rounded athletic body - the kind that is recognizable and aesthetically pleasing.

My physique was like Charles' but I got it from playing sports over years, not from doing isolated exercises in the gym. It's easy to spot who got big in the gym, as certain muscles are overemphasized.

So it's quite easy to be healthy and strong. Just pick an activity you like, and eat well. IMO, gym work should be on top of that, to get you competitive in the sport you choose. It's not a complete development unless you really know what you are doing and are extremely disciplined. That is, doing things the hard way.
What finally scared me off MS Windows were the forced updates and the blatant spyware.

I still run a MS OS from time to time: Windows 7, for some legacy software, well confined in a virtual box.

Linux is an alternative the days, both for individuals and companies.