skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Miranda is only implicated when you're taken into custody, which didn't happen here. It doesn't protect you from incriminating yourself in a voluntary conversation with the police, which is what happened here.

The purpose of Miranda, and the Fifth Amendment generally, is not to keep guilty defendants from incriminating themselves. It is to keep the State from using its coercive power to extract unreliable confessions from the accused. When an accused incriminates himself without the coercive power of the state being invoked, excluding the evidence does not serve the purpose of the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court has given a pretty broad reading to when the coercive power of the state is invoked, but has drawn the line just short of "any interaction with the police."
Fossil looks quite interesting. Thanks for the reference. https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/www/concepts...
"Your bot is broken, fix it so we can talk about our tools."
Opus codec available now in Asterisk
You can use any email client if you have access to the SMTP server; you use git send-email to send patches and your usual client for everything else.
I'm appalled at how many self-described liberals I know who consider themselves to be guardians of civil liberties not bat an eye to these restrictions. The matter of fact is that all the restrictions we put in place with respect to the free movement of peoples -- and the accompanying restrictions around employment, leisure, etc. -- are single-handedly the single biggest breach of human rights in the world. It is absolutely inexcusable that any person should "defend" any policy short of complete and total freedom of movement. I think this is the one thing that I believe in most strongly in all of my life -- I am confident that in the future -- perhaps many, many centuries from now -- we will look at these things with the same eyes with which we look at slavery in the past.
I find that Chris Rock has the best summary of it with his "I'm American" routine: "What, you think you’re better than somebody from France ’cause you came out of a pussy in Detroit?"

Nothing specifically American about it though. Many people in France think they're better than Syrian refugees because they're born from a pussy in Paris.

Full transcript:
http://www.cswap.com/2004/Chris_Rock:_Never_Scared/cap/en/25...
> You kinda deal with individual patches (commits) but not quite as prominently as in Darcs/Pijul.

Darcs patches and git commits are markedly different. A git commit is a snapshot. A Darcs patch is a set of changes (that is, the difference between two snapshot). Any similarity necessarily comes from the ability to recover a snapshot from sets of changes, or deduce a set of changes from two snapshots.

As far as I know, subversion only deals with a linear history. Its way of doing branching and merging is necessarily a kludge on top of this: branching and tagging actually perform a copy. Which explains the original difficulties with merging: a mere copy makes it harder to recover the most recent common ancestor required for a 3-way merge.
Just wondering what the ethical difference is between making false papers allowing anonymous travel and making encryption allowing anonymous communication?
Will Trump's Tax Returns Matter on Election Day
> Both of the solutions above are really cumbersome and prevent easy context switching.

Too frequent context switching might actually be perjudicial for your productivity and health, while increasing stress levels. So git not making it trivial might not be a bad thing, in my opinion.
Ads. Seriously. Say what you want about ads but they have helped me gain traction on both my games and my products. Only enough to get the word of mouth moving and after that it usually sorts it out itself.
"Creator" and "sponsor" are very odd words to use to describe that relationship. By this logic the UK is the "creator" and "sponsor" of the IRA.

In a sense it's true; the folks who wanted to violently revolt against the UK government were, in fact, UK citizens. Similarly, the folks who want to topple the house of Saud and impose their own government on Saudi Arabia are mostly Saudi citizens.

But I think it's a stretch to call that relationship "creator" and "sponsor". The UK government, as an organization, is staunchly opposed to the IRA. And similarly for the Saudi government.
Nowadays, travel is much more efficient. Therefore, we have to artificially make it difficult, otherwise large migrations will occur.

Suppose you are on a ship carrying a thousand people. If all people want to go to the left side then there's a big chance the ship will sink. Passengers are free but there must be some limitations to what they can all decide on total.
tl;dr The TypeScript compiler is strict, so it won't let you compile JavaScript that contains what it assumes are mistakes. I love that about TS, and it's one of the main reasons to use it.

The package incompatibility is different, but I've never had trouble using any JS or TS package in TS, so it doesn't seem to be a practical issue.
"College kid" is a common term in US media. In my (European) country, we call them "young" (as in, "Young invents device" or "Two youngs were yesterday found ..."), not children.
> I have yet to see any article that tells us (in believable terms and not just superficially) what "Assad" (meaning more than just the one guy) actually wants.

It's this level of analysis that is completely absent from news sources. In the UK there is a perpetual debate about immigration that cuts across party lines. I'd love to see some attempts at analysis of the various factions and what their motivations stem from. It occasionally gets touched upon but it's usually relegated the extended segments in the late news.

Give people context and background. Educate them to look behind the surface. Maybe we would then stop obsessing about the precise turn of phrase used by politicians as it has very little relationship to what's actually going on. Then maybe we can start thinking about having a functioning democracy.
You don't have to answer the phone…
The thing is, every editor has its quirks and none are perfect. In the end you should just choose one that is Good Enough™ and stick with it. Bonus points if it's easily extendable so you can tweak it to your (later) needs in that regard.
And Master Password is free software (GPLv3) (http://masterpasswordapp.com/).
>The pledge by the prime minister means the UK will leave the EU by spring 2019, before the next general election, with the prime minister also announcing plans for a “great repeal bill” to incorporate all EU regulations in UK law as soon as Brexit takes effect.

In what way is this not just a giant null-op?
Top 14 Best Survival Games for Android 2016 NEW
Healthcare being paid for by the employer suppresses US salaries, not increases them. The total cost of employment is pretty big, when you add in health insurance, paid holidays, 401k matching, employer side of payroll tax, stock options, real estate costs for office space, admin overhead, etc. But the liability is probably less due to at-will. I don't know how these companies afford it.
SSL Library Mbed TLS / PolarSSL
You should be using a polyfill no matter what; not everybody runs the latest builds. Some people don't even know what a latest build is--even tech people.
I have used Google Compute Engine, and we're quite happy. The I/O especially is quite good.
Why would location matter for the bulk of freelancing?
In his book "Abroad: British Literary Traveling between the Wars" [1] historian Paul Fussell devotes a whole chapter to "The Passport Nuisance":

> As a fixture of the european scene since 1915, the passport now seems so natural that one forgets the shock and scandal it once occasioned. Robert Byron is one who treated his with a due contempt. In the space asking about "Any special peculiarities," he entered "Of Melancholy appearance," and in the square reserved for a photograph of bearer's wife he drew a ludicrous cartoon, "resulting," Anthory Powell recalls, "in the document being withdrawn."

[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/154471.Abroad
Best workplace for creative work like programming is a room for yourself.

The shared office concept was a mistake inspired by assembly lines. Sharing space with coworkers is good in factories because work is often dull and workers can talk to each other.
For creative work, it's nothing but a hindrance.
How many times do you want people to tell you that everybody knows that Kolmogorov complexity (KC) is only defined up to a constant?

This does not affect the results that people use KC for, like the incompressibility of most strings.
80% of current drug applications in China failed to meet analysis requirements
It's really not though. And posting articles that pretend like "git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD" is the best way to view what branch you're working on just makes you look dumber than you do for acting like git is difficult to work with. If people writing blog posts about "how bad the git interface is" and more time instructing newer programmers (the only ones who have any reason to complain about git) on how to correctly use the tools maybe we wouldn't have to hear so much whining about the tool.

Anyone who has been in the field understands that for all it's tradeoffs git is an incredible breath of fresh air from systems like CVS/SVN.
It might be interesting for you to contemplate Schmidthuber's "speed prior".

http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/speedprior.html
This discussion is synonymous with whether countries should even have borders. If borders aren't policed, they may as well not even exist.

It would be great if all people were kind and caring, if there were no corruption, war, terrorism, religious fanaticism, crime or discrepancies in standards of living. But we've seen over and over that the road to hell is paved with good intentions. The problematic migrant situation in Europe is a good example of that.
There's no innate human right to freedom of movement within other societies.

Humans are individuals, individuals form into groups, and those groups when large and cohesive enough form into societies, civilizations, and now nation states. If those groups are to exist as a "group" they require these shared norms, values, culture to remain a viable group. If part of that culture is to exclude outsiders on the area of land on this earth that they control, then who is one individual or many individuals to say that this is invalid?

This presents a lot of opportunity for places like the United States where immigration and freedom of movement is more accepted - so you get more immigration and more growth. But that is something citizens of the US have decided, not external actors.
IRA is irrelevant for this discussion, let's stay on the topic:

At the moment ISIS does promote regime change in Saudi Arabia, so the regime there really don't like them related to that, but the former history is very different.

They also don't complain to ISIS' application of Sharia (punishments, like decapitations and outlawing homosexuals and atheists) as they are anyway prescribed by the same Sharia understanding, in big part common to Saudis and ISIS. They also don't condemn fighting against Shias, as both consider them "unbelievers" who are to be fought and killed.

Assad is also Alawite, also the enemy of both ISIS and Saudis.

Edit: I see you again try to "prove by" (for me false) "analogy with IRA" in your following reply. Please just stay on topic to ISIS. You can't prove anything, at least to me, by avoiding to discuss the relevant facts of the relevant topic.
Do you really know named return value in golang?
Indeed Atom has problems, but it is still the most popular editor in JavaScript community.
I'm using it everyday for almost two years already and I'm happy with it. However that's my personal choice.
Standard Economics Is Wrong. Inequality and Unearned Income Kills the Economy
This!

It's absurd for people to be required to do CAPTCHAs just for read access to a page.

The experience of having to repeatedly perform CAPTCHAs the whole time is a real barrier.
How the hell are you supposed to behave?

Police officers have the informal authority to make your life miserable (detaining for 24hrs without cause, selective enforcement, the ability to lie both to you and the court and be taken at their word, etc). No lawyer is going to advise talking to the police, but there's clearly an element of selection bias in that. In cases that don't wind up requiring a lawyer, cooperation with the person who has this power over you is almost certainly to your benefit. The real question is how to draw the line, and all the lawyerly "never say a word to the police ever unless you're invoking the 5th" really doesn't help.
Nothing new here. Watch this, for examples, https://twitter.com/MrTonyMan/status/766660512566435840/phot...
I'm surprised no one has mentioned the book "The Talent Code" by Daniel Coyle.[1] I play several stringed instruments and applying the concepts in that book has made a huge difference in my rate of progress. He talks a lot about Ericsson's work, and is firmly in the camp that believes that improvement can always be achieved through practice, when the practice is done properly.

[1] http://thetalentcode.com/
yea but you need a login and have to pay for p2p. syncthing does the same but free and without a login.
With default settings Windows 10 even shares the password automatically with contacts in Skype, Outlook or Facebook...
This is not at all anything that has been put into practice. Merely a report on some thoughts and ideas.
I checked wiktionary before posting and did not see that. Where do you see that? https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/democratize

EDIT: Ah, ok, it's under "https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/democratic". But I'm still not seeing 1915 there.

EDIT2: Ok it was hidden under an expandable.
+1 for masterpassword. I always loved the concept of brain vaults. One thing about masterpassword is that I don't trust the clients and I can't inspect what's being logged when I fire up the app. The iOS app is closed source and proprietary and although the idea is great, the clients are not to be trusted. Get yourself a copy of the Javascript client, and place it in a secure VM so you have full oversight of what the code is doing. And don't let the application talk to the internet...
Future regulations will be made independently, so I'd think of it more like a git branch.
Who is the target audience for your product? Where do they hang out? Who are the influencers in their communities? Talk to your target users and get feedback. If the product is a really great product/market fit then you don't need to network to get users. You need to make sure your product is solving a need for someone and then find ways to let them know about it.
Done and online http://www.freelancelist.in/ .
Thanks, you guys! :)
That's a pretty 'average' phone for a comeback.
> There's no innate human right to freedom of movement within other societies

No human rights are innate though, they're all man made.
Does this also support shared folders for teams?
> What does it say when resolving these problems the easiest thing is to just reclone the remote repo?

It says the git works really well because the CLI offers a simple way to "undo" any mistakes you've made. The real reason people struggle with git, and I've seen this in many other programs/places is that they rely on discoverability and just randomly try commands until they work.

Git's simplicity is it's downfall. You don't see people wrapping Angular2 in other frameworks to deal with the warts.

There's a reason people are told to look at man pages all the time, the command line is not the place to play "discoverability". There's already plenty of suggestions and help features built into the tool.

> It's crap experience, and all I want to do is code.

- every engineer when first experiencing version control
I support freedom of movement, but I also understand people's worries about unmanageable burdens placed on support systems for a nation's people. Of course, if there were no support systems this would be a moot point, and is one of the few counterarguments to, say, increased public healthcare or pensions, that made sense.

HN has a lot of proponents of universal basic income. Say a small country, maybe Iceland with only a few hundred thousand people, introduces a basic income of $1000 per month. For many people around the world that is an incredibly huge sum. How do you handle the millions that are likely to arrive to enjoy those benefits? Do you:

* Tell them they can come and live there but not claim it, effectively making them second class citizens?

* Bankrupt your government providing this benefit to people who are not initially contributing lots of taxes?

* Restrict entry to people who are probably going to be a net gain for your government's coffers?

Not to mention that when you see a large, _sudden_ influx of people with substantially different language and culture it can be a severe shock to the original inhabitants. I am ardently in favour of helping refugees but I can understand the challenges that occur when newcomers with different cultural norms become a significant part of a place's population. (Aside - it's kind of ridiculous that the US is squabbling about taking maybe ten thousand refugees from a place that they destabilized while Germany takes over a million)
Of course you should be polite. It's possible to speak and say nothing up until you need to say "I see you have some important questions. Let's arrange a time when my lawyer can be present."
Why you might not need Emacs for Clojure development
> There's no innate human right to freedom of movement within other societies.

Sure there is, at least if you acknowledge the notion of human rights in the first place. (There's no "innate human right" to not be tortured.)

Without governments, there is no impedance to freedom of movement. This isn't merely theoretical: as governments have become stronger and their reach extended across the globe, the ability to move freely has correspondingly decreased.
Since unknown ciphersuites seem to be much better handled (i.e. are ignored), I wonder if keeping the header version at 1.2 while extending the ciphersuites with more that indicate 1.3-like behaviour would be better for backwards compatibility. For example,

TLS 1.3 will sign all messages before server authentication, even though it makes Transcript Collision Attacks somewhat easier to mount.

...there could be a ciphersuite which tells the server to do this.
I don't see any improvement over git. Just another set of commands you'll need to learn from scratch. Some ideas seem not very good, like committing all changed files by default. If you find git commands too verbose - try 'tig' - the ncurses git client, it saves a lot of time and efforts being simple and straightforward at the same time.
I was referring to the fact that in git you can cherry-pick a commit as the similar mechanism.
Then this company - Sceptive is kinda Deceptive. It says on their web page: "Or clone Open Source implementation from Github"
It's simplicity and ubiquity are the only reason we keep seeing absurd programs like Gitless put forth. Imagine if someone came out with someone that "fixed the warts of QT" that was just a wrapper around QT. It's a joke.

It's coffeescript vs javascript all over again and we saw how that played out.

Don't like how git works? contribute. Don't make some stupid command line utility that just adds another entire layer of abstraction on top because people don't want to take an hour to read about git internals.
I am. I just have one simple rule - respect when somebody is trying to focus to do their job. I give it to all, but I also expect it too.
Several things:

(1) Your real market is the people/companies seeking to hire freelancers. You need to focus the site on that. Once you start having jobs listed, the freelancers will come. Otherwise, as a freelancer there is no real reason to join unless you offering some other benefit.
(2) It's fine if you only want to have freelancers from Mumbai or Bangalore, but if you want listings you need to open that up to more than just those to locations.
(3) Change the Title of the page "No bullshit Listings for Freelancers" really doesn't sound professional and if you are targeting people/companies seeking to hire, may be a turn-off.
(4) Create a landing page that tells what and why. I understand you want "simple" but at the same time you need to explain what/why/how.
And it hits the most important point of: Gitless tries to do away with the staging area, thus completely misunderstands Git.
Thanks for your points, hoping you or someone else can answer a few questions.

How did you find the jump from inhouse to doing your own consulting? Is it just a case of getting experience in delivering? i.e. more likely to have success after some junior manager experience inhouse?

I had a really good GM in my last job who taught me a fair bit about how the business works - after moving on I've felt that void in other roles where senior managers are much less transparent. I want to streamline into business function ownership - have you got any advice on how to get to this stage or does this just come with general experience and following management track up?
I would advise against ads if you're just starting and don't even know if you have a real product on your hands nor how to run ads. That's an easy way to waste a lot of money very fast.
The problematic migrant situation in Europe is a good example of that.

Is it? Are illegal immigrants more likely to cause problems that both natives and legal immigrants? From what I can tell, at least the attacks that make the news have all been perpetrated by people born and raised in Europe.

EDIT: http://www.dw.com/en/report-refugees-have-not-increased-crim...
Such a shame trojan horse Elop tanked the company by partnering with Microsoft, I'd have loved to see more of their Linux based phones, I've still got a Nokia N9 which has to be my favourite handset so far.

I hope Ubuntu for phones can gain at least some traction.
Indeed. I would be fine with "open borders" as long as every subsidy and welfare program is eliminated. It is unfair for people to have free stuff from the local government just because they happen to have been born there.
This isn't very compelling. I recommend solving different problems. (I hope I'm not harsh, I'm just trying to be honest)
In a word, islamazation.

In a last minute move Obama, a Muslim, has taken the first step, perhaps the only step, in handing over a level of censorship power to other Muslims, like saudi arabia.

The Internet is about to become disproportionately friendly to Muslims, positive about Islam and very hostile to those who would criticize it. They can use the domain power to gain other Internet powers, like censorship of site content.

It will have a chilling effect on anti Islam speech and be a Hayday for Muslim propaganda and hate and terror speech like ISIS web sites,which will no longer be taken down.

Other last minute surprises are Obama giving Iran over a billion dollars in cash and removing the freeze on their bank accounts. As you know he also tried to block the 9/11 victims ability to sue terrorist sponsoring nations.
Would you be ok if every local government was required to provide welfare programs and subsidies to their population? Seems "fair".
One of the few sane posts here that is considering the realities of "the borderless world".

There are reasons why countries all over the world have immigration policies. Each country is interested in immigration that serves its interests, and the leaders are well aware of the negative consequences of unrestricted immigration.

The experiments with this like the Schengen Area might not survive the consequences in the coming future.

Most people here seem to blinded by some liberal pipe-dream.