skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Okay, I guess

>we'd be even happier if we could coordinate non-driving

was more central to what you were getting at. I've never really thought of the presence of other drivers as a primary or even ancillary reason to also drive. Far more important are things like the weather, duration of the trip, physical exertion, cargo capacity, do I want to be sweaty and tired when I get there, is there a locker room with a shower, etc. In Milwaukee, Chicago, and Berkeley I've always felt like the separation of pedestrians and bikes from cars was pretty good.

There are places where it's dangerous to bike in the Milwaukee and Chicago metros, but they were also the kind of places you'd never visit unless you lived in them, and I didn't.

It sounds like LA could solve your problem with better sidewalks and bike lanes at much lower net cost to everyone else.

I guess people in LA are being coerced to drive, but plenty of other places facilitate driving, cycling, and walking safely at the same time.

The more interesting tension (to me) is between density and parking, where my basic argument is that parking inhibits density but is also inclusive of a much larger land area (and therefore people paying lower rents), while dense areas without parking are great for their residents but coercive to the people who can't or don't want to pay the rents in them.
Never write shell scripts again
MITM introduces significant delays, yet another single point of failure, adds significant risk of leakage. Current DPI are passive, so they have no such problems.
$3000 is enough to get you two gaming pcs along with a rift.
I have a UAP-AC-Pro and a second UAP-AC as an extender, and they're great. But I ordered an AmpliFi HD anyway because it will probably be easier to maintain and I'm interested in the mesh networking. I'm hoping it lives up to expectations.
Milton Friedman made a similar point about the advantages of a complex tax code for those in power.

A complex tax code favors those that will contribute to politicians in order to gain a special benefit or avoid a specific harm. Paraphrased obviously. Here's the original lecture: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TruCIPy79w8
Design with FontForge
I imagine the novelty wears off pretty fast, but the wow factor for first time users is pretty awesome. I would say just taking it to work/friends and sharing that experience makes it more worthwhile and also aids the VR cause! :)
I don't know about that - very little software is written in C these days. Even parts of the Windows and Mac kernels are written in at least C++ and Microsoft had an entire OS written in C# internally. Meanwhile the games industry has been C++ since forever (which still isn't great but better than C) and most business and web software is written in GCd languages.

BTW the kernel is full of reference counts.
Why make the assumption that he is mentally ill? As I see it it is just a reference to the very popular conspiracy (theories?) that several of Hillarys problematic staff and opponents has died under wierd circumstances, like shot in the back of the head during a robbery with nothing stolen from the victim, shotgun suicides, guccifer hung in his cell in Russia and much more.

Furthermore Hillary has suggested that Julian Assange should be dronestriked: http://www.snopes.com/julian-assange-drone-strike/
Some kind of introduction on what it actually does and what problem it solves would be nice, it's not entirely clear when just reading the README in your repository.

It seems like it's keeping an ssh connection open in the background, and `esh` allows you to interact with the remotely connected machine without actually opening an interactive session, correct? Could you also maybe explain a bit how you do this, or do you just want us to browse the source code? :)

Oh, you should really add a LICENSE to your project as well.
https://help.github.com/articles/open-source-licensing/
This is true for before-modern-sanitation European cities, not really valid for today

Unless you're dealing with something very contagious, in which case the city density is the least of your problems (people still get together in schools, offices, etc)
I use monboob (http://weboob.org/applications/monboob) on my little VPS to fetch rss feeds and send them to me by email. This way I don't need an extra application, and it is automatically synchronized on all my devices, thanks to yet another decade-old standard: IMAP

(I do need to set some filters on my Gmail so they don't appear in the INBOX, though)
Why did the NEED the first one in such a way that disappeared it? Apple is just Apple; too much money to make complete sense. They were getting raked over the coals for their shite cloud services. How acquiring and sequestering RethinkDB was a necessity in correcting that situation is anybody's guess...
This is the sort of thing that needs to live in a bigger company that wants a quality database product to round out its product offering.
For air navigation, there is the exception of Russia (and ex URSS countries) where metric system was the norm. Each time I have encountered meteorology software, they were using m.s-1. It was a big source of confusion.
What Google need to do next is to finally get out from under Qualcomm. They're a big part of the reason why older hardware can't be supported by newer versions of Android.
Parens Notation
This is part of the problem though. Everyone's experience is different. You are on stock, not everyone is. Android market is fragmented whereas with Apple you and your Mom and neighbor are all on the same iOS. Its not hype its real. You showing off your stock android running smooth as butter doesn't help convince someone running a phone preloaded with bloatware and a different UI.

I don't know what the right answer is but Apple has one phone and one OS, android has many phones and many looks to their OS. This could be part of why there will never be an iPhone killer aside from Apple themselves.
The declarator looks complex because of differences in the precedence and associativity between the asterisk, `[]` and `()` operators. The point is that the language uses a set of the same operators with the same precedence and associativity both in declarations and in normal expressions.

In my view, a "user-oriented" declaration of an array of pointers would look like `pointer[10] of int`, and not `int *arr[10]`.
> who have proven willing to throw down real money to buy hardware to play specific games

It remains to be seen how many of these will buy a VR headset. Peripherals have always been a very marginal aspect even on dedicated gaming hardware. If there's an actual killer application (i.e. a must have game) I could see myself buying into it, but as long as the VR "games" are either glorified demos or badly converted regular games that are worse than their non-VR counterpart, I won't spend a cent on it.
> took forever to adopt EMV in the US and other idiocies

Totally agree with your comment, but I'll go a little bit on a tangent here.

I am an European, all my cards have always had a chip, I have not even seen a card without a chip until I visited the United States. All this reluctance to adopt chips seems so ridiculous to me.

But then I spent more time in the United States and with magnetic stripe cards, and boy do I love the better experience.

Let's see, in the US I can swipe a card at any moment of the transaction, and this physical act takes less than a second.

With chip, in most European countries not only I have to wait for the cashier to scan everything, but I also have to wait for the cashier to press a magic button that says "card payment"; only then does the POS become active.

Then I have to plug the card in, different POS terminals require the card to be put in different orientations, wait 3 seconds for the terminal to do whatever, insert PIN, wait another 5-30 seconds until the transaction runs, and then get my card back.

Or let's look at NFC. I still have to wait for the cashier to scan everything and push the magic button, I have to press the card 3 seconds on the POS until the NFC chip is read. Since there's no feedback, I have no idea if I keep the card in the right place until it beeps. After that, it still takes the same 5-20 seconds until it's done. The only advantage of NFC is that I don't have to plug my card in the terminal, but since the progress feedback is worse, I am not sure how that is any improvement at all.

The user experience is so much worse. Why wouldn't I want a magstripe-only card? Yes, it's (vastly) more insecure, but I am not liable for fraud. I don't have anything to lose.
I wouldn't call it 'production'. I'm prototyping experimental number systems for high-performance computing and my supervisor has been doing it in mathematica to date, which is so glacial it's unacceptable. Took hours to do a calculation that julia can do in seconds.
How to create an MVP(Minimum Viable Product) that can get your startup funded?
But the bank follows the regulations that tell it to give me all my money back, if there's some fraud. I don't have any money to lose if the bank does not implement security properly. Only the bank has to lose.
Bagel, pretzel show twists of Nobel Prize-winning work in physics
>> However, that's exactly how the non-western major world civilisations are called. Barbarians, mysticals and unscientific etc are the words used to describe them.

"Barbarian" though is a Greek word, used by Greeks to describe anyone speaking a language that wasn't the Greek language. I'm guessing the article either ignores this or uses "barbarian" as a translation of a similar term used in the Far Eastern world, and which I don't know. I'm pretty sure there must have been one.
While K&R is a nice book, it's really not sufficient to become productive with C. IIRC it doesn't cover things like make, valgrind and libraries. There's a book 21st Century C which does the job of addressing that.
>implementation-defined

In theory that's important, in practice you rely on implementation-defined behavior and put it behind a layer of macros. It's not perfect but it works - low level capabilities are not the problem in C.

Lack of high level abstractions make scaling it up and maintaining a PITA.
>If they adopted the Windows on PC device driver model, it would be so great for users...

I seriously doubt it. I just changed my broadband provider at home. Our Macs, mobile devices and WDTV connected to the new wifi router immediately, but it took 2 hours to get the Windows laptop to connect to the internet. It found the wifi network fine, but no internet. This has happened before. Googling found dozens of hits for this issue, all with different solutions that worked for different people and each time it's happened to me on the same laptop different solutions have worked, such as: Delete the device in device manager and then scan for new hardware; ipconfig /renew; fiddling with Advanced driver settings.

This time I fixed it by reverting from the Microsoft driver to the vendor provided driver. The last thing we need on our phones is hardware, drivers and OS developed by different companies that don't talk to each other and don't do proper whole-system integration testing on all builds and upgrades.
The problem isn't generation, but consumption. If you're consuming feeds, Atom is significantly better than RSS because it's better specified.
Supporting the future of Wikidata
Ugh, that's the last thing I want to see. I didn't start diving into Rust until very recently for two reasons: 1) the instability of the language and 2) the terrible, juvenile hatred for C and C++ that seems to almost be a pre-requisite for participation in the ecosystem. Rust until recently was an anti-C hipster's wet dream ("upstart"-y, not really yet ready for wide-spread use, and a convenient goto for folks wanting to have a bit of trendy "bash C (or C++)" fun.

Both items have diminished considerably lately, though, and that's something I can appreciate.
Top Pricing Strategies for Online Retailers
You're implying that Samsung and Sony aren't well known for not giving updates.
It's a reference to Justin_K's earlier statement "a Knot is standard for navigation world wide because the unit is standardized on earth's size".

If that justifies knot then it also justifies kilometers, because it too was originally standardized on the earth's size.

Neither are exactly the size as originally defined.

A modern knot is 1852 meters. One minute of latitude is "about 1,855.325 m on the WGS 84 ellipsoid" says https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nautical_mile. The difference is 0.16%.

A quarter of the Earth is:

1855.325m * 60 seconds/degree * 360 degrees/circle /4 = 10018755.0
= ~10018 km.

The difference is 0.19%.
For one, it depends where you come from. If you earn in the neighborhood of $25M a year it's likely you will find jail less comfortable than your home.

Secondly, breaking the law or even challenging NFLs carries a personal risk of going to jail, while silently complying carries almost zero personal risk, and a small risk of damaging the company's reputation if/when someone finds out. If you're not very strongly principled, the choice is really easy to make.
> Take this example: A regulation says that all incoming traffic into a banking sector company must be scanned for potential vulnerabilities and exploits, and allows for "compensating controls". If the incoming traffic is unable to be decrypted at TLS1.3, it will simply be decrypted at the boarder of the business and routed internally unencrypted.

Sorry, I don't get it. All encrypted traffic is typically decrypted by the recipient. There's no need to add transport-level vulnerabilities to facilitate virus/exploit checks.
It seems roughly equivalent to a fairly recent iPhone. I see nothing like being officially water resistant like the iPhone 7, and seemingly no now widely lauded portrait mode thanks to dual cameras and its depth perception. The iPhone 7 also seems to use an (in normal use) more powerful CPU.

So maybe it's more like a premium priced iPhone 6s or so. Outside of Apple's ecosystem. How in the world would that be a "real threat"? The 32 GB Pixel is expected to land at $650, the (now finally) 32 GB iPhone 6s will cost you $550. It'll cost you $100 more and it'll make you lose your ecosystem!

It looks like a method for Google to stop the drain to Apple through an alluring Apple design at best, not something that will do much in the other direction.

As an iPhone user, this doesn't interest me in the slightest, other than an "academical" interest where it's interesting to see Google finally seeing the light. Now let's see if Google will introduce a certification program so people can look at a label in the specs of any Android phone and know that the smartphone will not be loaded with crap. Let the OEM's be still free to do it, but let people have an easier time to vote with their money.
Indeed, orthogonal. I think it's a denied attempt to connect cross-purposes. I.e. design for security with practicalities of implementation in a broader context.

I notice some posts argue that we should aim for a pareto-optimum and accommodate the banks, but really this should require a broad representation for the rest of the subjects of TLS 1.3 to work out exactly what the pareto would look like. Given that they are 15 drafts in, it seems to me that there has been ample opportunity.
I hope that RethinkDB (the company) gets acquired. I think the main hurdle for them is that their product is open source.

Unfortunately a lot of large old-school software companies believe that there is no IP (no sense of ownership) when it comes to open source - This is not true however. Open source companies still 'own' the code repos, the documentation website, the team, the chat boards, the domain names, the package manager registries, Docker registries, etc... What is more valuable; the source code or everything else?
Best Global Brands 2016
8BIT ROCKSTARS Is Looking for Drupal Developer
Right. And at the end of the day, skilled attackers can either: a) not care if you decrypt their traffic as they're already in your network and it's too late by the time you're reviewing the incident or b) take a copy of your checklist and say, "well here's something they'll probably never figure out"

A little out of the checkbox thinking goes a long way for attackers. It could for enterprises too if they could overcome their inertia.
8BIT ROCKSTARS Is Looking for Magento Developer
other people like to be able to go places on their own timetable. No one likes having to spend an hour to take a fifteen minute drive.
How Retailers Harness the Power of Retail Data Analytics
Best place to learn about proc IMHO... And possibly linux header files..
Usually Big Banking has a sufficient amount of employees that there can be a group that is very interested in the latest developments and a completely different group that only wants to check off boxes on a compliance sheet and change as little as possible "to avoid risk".
Microsoft Band out of fitness race this year, may not return
>The Rust team has a very high commitment to stability, and does way more to maintain stability than any other language/compiler I know of (by testing new versions and potentially-breaking-changes against the entire ecosystem)

Yes, but my experience is that they don't seem to manage generating the kind of trust needed to get my peers to give it a serious go. It's a purely social and subjective problem.

>Just because multiple implementations of Rust don't exist (there are a couple but nothing 100% feature complete iirc) doesn't mean that the community doesn't understand the need for it.

As i said, it SEEMS to be so. That means that it is a subjective impression my colleagues and me get. It is the job of the community to generate trust, not the (potential) user's.

>Alternate implementations are hard to write and take time.

Yes, see my P.S. Time will tell if it's worth it to compiler vendors. C made it easy for them right from the start.

>Note that most languages have gone for years without getting a proper spec or alternate implementations. This is an advantage C has over Rust, agreed. It's usually not a dealbreaker, though.

Not a dealbreaker for whom? In the infrastructure and big machine business you will see C, some C++ and Ada. All standardized.

If the Rust community wants to offer an alternative for C, C++ and Ada, AND want Rust to succeed as an alternative, they need to understand that trust (in the toolchain) is generated in different ways in different industries.
Just order your favourite phone from outside the US. We have all of them unlocked for sale at any major retailer across the pond.
Reuters – Yahoo allowed US government to secretly scanning customer emails
آفر تور تایلند در هتل های بانکوک ورود ۲۸ اکتبر ۲۰۱۶
The only people who think that javascript and the javascript "ecosystem" is anything other than an utter disaster seem to be those who've never used anything else.
The original message does make dubious claims, but a little later in the thread, the real issue becomes clear.

from https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/1n1tQSGKMBJKsmuCe-...

"With TLS 1.2 we can ask the end user to take a Wireshark trace and then decrypt it with the RSA private key. With TLS 1.3 we will have to rely on the SSLKEYLOGFILE feature in Firefox and Chrome, so we want it to be available. Unfortunately, Microsoft does not allow this functionality, which is a problem in a TLS 1.3 only environment."

As I understand their argument, if you control the server (and hence private key and cipher suite) you can store the traffic without MITM and later decrypt it if needed. With forward secrecy, that isn't possible.
I don't claim to be knowledgable in all of the Android devices, but I don't believe there's an Android device with an equivalent to the Taptic Engine and 3D touch.
Well, having to wear a safety belt is also an inferior experience but we do it for safety

True, swiping is faster (but you have to scribble something on a paper or an e-screen where the end result usually resembles nothing like your signature) :)

I can agree with the criticism there but the tradeoff doesn't bother me (too much)
The guy is basically complaining that they have to change all their infra over to MITM versus just decrypting traffic with private keys.

He is right, it will be expensive. And he has a right to complain. Should the working group ignore him? It's a tough call. You risk forking standards when you start to do that.
> the TLDR is that the judge said the customers will never know their email is being read so how can you claim that a privacy violation has occurred?

Really? A judge really said that? So if I place a camera in my neighbors' bathroom, and they never find out about it, everything's okay? Does it work with other crimes? If I steal millions from a company, but they never figure it out because their accounting department is sub-par, then I'm fine??
You're assuming that IT staff in the banking industry is competent and that they have a good budget to work with, but a lot of evidence suggests that often neither of that is the case.
I agree with the message of the article.

It can be daunting to start out. I think the problem is not following the fad and do your own research into what solves your problem.

I felt the same way when I started. So I documented every step I took and I can say with confidence I am comfortable in the JavaScript universe.

If you are interested in how I learned it you can follow me here:

https://www.codemy.net/channels/react-foundation
Panda Antivirus Pro 2015 Activation Code Crack Free Download
That would imply that you have significant inflation in USD which is not the case.
Old man strength: is dad really stronger?
<not necessarily my views, but a lens to view the argument from:>

However regulation isn't static. Infact, TLS1.3 is likely to live on longer than any given set of government or industry regulations.

If old regulations have a dependency on TLS1.2, then they'll be stuck on that until they "upgrade"
Cathy O’Neil on Weapons of Math Destruction
> The Rust team has a very high commitment to stability, and does way more to maintain stability than any other language/compiler I know of (by testing new versions and potentially-breaking-changes against the entire ecosystem)

I'm all for this but I really don't see how Rust's stability can hold a candle to the international standards committees that govern C and C++ (not to mention the investment from the big tech companies in developing and implementing these standards)
Why has this been marked dupe? What is it a dupe of - I don't see any other story on the front page about this?
A back button would make no sense to me. There are situations in apps when you can't "go back" -- wait, do you mean some physical back button?! Otherwise, there's the "Return to..." feature, the fact that the back button in most iOS apps is always the top left button of the navigation bar, and there's always the left edge swipe. If you can't figure out how to go back in an app, then it's the app's fault, not the phone's. "I have to learn every single screen of every single app" -- come on, bro, that's a bit much.

As for the store, well, the App Store actually has standards and minimums for apps and reviews. I would think a google search for "best qrcode app ios" would yield better results than your strange method, but, hey, to each his own.