skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Belly vs. non-belly fat is something to do with hormones and cytokines that isn't really understood yet (probably also related to why some people develop metabolic syndrome at relatively normal weight/fat levels), so until that mystery is resolved "get rid of belly fat" is synonymous with "get rid of fat". Steroids notwithstanding, the only specific thing I've heard of to fight muscle catabolism under a calorie deficit is to maintain a strength training regimen while having a significant intake of branched chain amino acids [1], and I don't know how reliable that approach actually is.

[1] https://examine.com/supplements/Branched+Chain+Amino+Acids/
The Apache 2.0 provides a patent grant, and the whole reason they were looking for a new license was to add a patent grant. So if Apple wants to sue anyone who uses LLVM for patent infringement, why are they spending so much money on lawyers to figure out how to switch to a license with a patent grant?
Counter-Intelligence (as in, foreign governments running operations on U.S. soil) is the jurisdiction of the of the FBI.

CIA might catch wind of things, but it's the FBI that investigates. They work together, but separation is clear.
A Peek at the Secret English Farm Where Amazon Tests Its Drones
I thought they opened it up but maybe I am mistaken. I vaguely recall something about other browsers being slower than the built in one, maybe that was fixed?
This is not correct at all.

Some surplus protein is converted to sugars (glyconeogenesis), from there it has a good shot at being converted into triglycerides and stored as fat.

If it was as simple as raw physical storage, bodybuilding would be dominated by eating-contest winners.
The existing patent agreements seem to make the current license not comparable BSD but instead comparable to an awkward or even apparently extreme Apache 2.0, so isn't this about in practice removing restrictions, not adding restrictions? (This thought process is backed up by their stated reasoning and the kinds of contributors that are supposedly complaining.)
http://www.mintpressnews.com/MyMPN/the-myth-of-bitter-lake-w...

the more accepted narrative - https://www.e-education.psu.edu/egee120/node/241
Let's try this, instead: can you name some important fundamental theoretical work in cryptography that isn't defined by attacks? Obviously, that's a subjective judgement. Whatever you name though, we can just look and see how much of it is defined by attacker capabilities.
>> Post Vietnam, in the eighties, almost half of US were veterans.

Source? A quick Google search shows roughly 3.4MM deployed soldiers in Vietnam and another 4-5MM non-theater personnel.

[1] http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004615.html

[2] http://fivethirtyeight.com/datalab/what-percentage-of-americ...
Is dual license a possibility?
Not really. Due to diffraction, the wavelength you need to resolve an axon (let alone the much more challenging dendritic projections) is on the order of a micron, which is near infrared. Unfortunately, our skulls are opaque in this wavelength. You could possibly do X-rays, but the consensus is that blasting your head with the amount of ionizing radiation you'd need is a Bad Idea™.

There's possibly some room for a clever super resolution technique, but I haven't seen anything about it (it's also not my field).
But a boycott is supposed to help the cause, no? All you're doing is preventing a lot of people from using your code from fear that you'll sue them - some of which who might end up using an alternative from a company that holds and supports patents.
I think you missed the most important contribution of 9front: theo(1). it's like fortune(1), but with quotes from deraadt :)
So, moving from fiat crypto to gold standard crypto?

I love how everything eventually comes full circle.
Do bullet detectors exist? For this big of area?

Also black ops would never do the same trick twice :)
Line Following Robot with Video
> I've seen some studies that say the number of reps you do doesn't matter.

For hypertrophy, past a minimal amount of stress, it increasingly seems that it doesn't matter[0].

For strength it matters.

[0] http://strengtheory.com/hypertrophy-range-fact-fiction/
You mean DJB, Zimmerman, and others fighting the governments to change the status quo encryption policy followed by deployment of higher-quality stuff than average proprietary in FreeBSD and Linux that got widely adopted by most of the Internet? Nobody has ever showed me evidence that Theo or OpenBSD had any impact on the security of the Internet as a whole. Maybe on specific users of OpenBSD or the developers' higher-quality software. Not the big picture, though.

I'm open to specific examples if you have them of widespread changes in INFOSEC or massive adoption of better tech due to Theo de Raadt.

EDIT: I'm aware of many good apps they've made. To clarify, my comment is addressing this broad claim:

"The 'net is secure in no small part to his efforts and that of the rest of the OpenBSD team."

OpenSSH might get credit due to massive use. Good example. Past that, what else does most of the net on client side (mainly Windows & Mac) or server-side (mainly Win, FreeBSD, and Linux) depend on from OpenBSD developers?
I thought Apple was being fined by EU for a huge sum (just another reason).
Can you please release "fat loss" program for free and inversely, charge for info on getting bigger? I mean, how would one notice an actual growth behind his varying fat levels?
Re: "non-event"

This could be a big step in the direction of displacing the US dollar as a global reserve currency, replacing it with the SDR. Maybe it is a non-event because the effects won't be instantaneous, but they very well might be game changers.

I am not an economist, nor could one easily convince me that the petrodollar and the artificially increased global demand for US dollars that result from it are insignificant. We will likely be seeing this change, soon. This all relates and touches on what seems to me, critical components of the world economy. Maybe a non-event - for a little while.
Digix is another interesting blockchain/gold project being built on Ethereum:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWbgMoJVIzk&feature=share
I’m just curious, what standards did they violate other than circumventing SHA-1 deprecation?
We got heard by the powers to be at MongoDB and are now working with them to resolve the issue.

I'm with @clevertap
> Automatic judgment of law is terrifying. Consider that from the perspective of people that don't have your level of privilege. Minority groups regularly have to fight democratically created prejudices, and human judgment - judges, juries, etc - that has the option to not apply the law is an important safety mechanism.

In other words, are you saying the system might be prejudiced?

But even so, as long as it's less prejudiced than humans (notoriously bad), it'll be better.
You should include your actual lifting experience rather than irrelevant stuff like startup founder and engineer.

By the end of the first page my impression is that you started lifting for 90 days and decided to nerd out and write a guide (which is probably not true, but I'm also not motivated to continue reading to find out).

Tell me your stats and the timeframe you achieved them in. Can't really approach this topic abstractly and theoretically like engineering.
I think you're thinking of the fact that WKWebView allows you to use the JIT, whereas UIWebView didn't allow for that.

There are still various ways in which third-party browsers are penalized, such as links from other applications being hardwired to open in Safari.
I'd guess it's the other way round. I see a lot of fiction which is ripped from the headlines. People are endlessly creatively crazy and ripping off real life is a lot easier than making stuff up.
No, you've got German public broadcasting totally wrong. NDR is not related to the government in any way. It's not even funded by taxes but they have their own agency for that in order to not meddle with political influence.

They could share the data if they want with the governments but the government has no say and no way to get the data with any legal means.
Does this company have any 'official' relation to Paxos, the consensus protocol? This sounds like an incredibly unfortunate and potentially misleading name.

Addendum: I'm by no means an expert on this subject, but are't all those fintech startups that dabble in 'permissioned block chains' and 'distributed ledgers' without incorporating bitcoin's proof of work / public p2p nature effectively just selling rebranded distributed databases? In that light the name Paxos would be even more comical.
I'm all for antitrust regulators being more active to spur competition, but this is an odd one. Microsoft certainly pays OEMs to configure Bing, Google & Yahoo have paid Mozilla to use their search engine. Yahoo pays for crapware to install their toolbar, often paying malware authors, and yet it's Android that gets them in a frenzy.

Google clearly has platform power here, but targeting the payments is such an odd one to me. I can't believe phone manufacturers will be happy about this either since competing search engines probably won't pay them as much in light of this.
Anecdotally true or verifiably true?
This definitely should be caught by any reasonable testing regimen for a database but the underlying issue appears (upon casual inspection of the architecture) to be something different.

Most people design storage engines without a true I/O scheduler (WiredTiger appears to be such a case), mostly because it requires a huge amount of expert code work that doesn't payoff for narrow use cases. The caveat is that it is difficult-to-impossible to design a storage engine that has very high performance and is well behaved under diverse workloads without a proper I/O scheduler.

The side of "generalized good behavior" or "very high performance" tradeoff a storage engine falls on depends on the original goals of the developer and there are many such storage engines that explicitly optimize for excellent behavior under diverse loads over performance (PostgreSQL is such an example). In the case of WiredTiger, it was marketed as "very high performance" but is now being used under increasingly diverse workloads that exposes this tradeoff. Without making changes that saddle performance, behavioral edge cases are largely unavoidable; you can move them around but not completely eliminate them.

This remains, in my opinion, the most important difference between open and closed source storage engines in practice. In closed source, most of your high-performance storage engines implement true I/O schedulers, usually by the same few specialists that float around between companies.
In fairness, the FBI are political actors. They'd be the last people I'd call if I suspected I was being screwed by Boeing and Lockheed, of all people.
how is that relevant?
Did you read the article?

"EU antitrust regulators plan to order Alphabet's (GOOGL.O) Google to stop paying financial incentives to smartphone makers to pre-install Google Search exclusively on their devices and warned the company of a large fine, an EU document showed."
IMHO, a lot of time spent studying proper form by watching YouTube videos (Scott Hermann, BuffDudes, Layne Norton, ...) will help you a lot more. A lot of this is mental; it's you figuring things out. I don't think PTs are good teachers. But I've learned a lot from watching these guys over and over again.

All that and learn to love the squat. Paused ATG. Squats make everything better.
> Bluetooth USB dongle

I admittedly don't use Bluetooth and every time I've tried it's been a horrible experience.

> USB wifi module.

Mine works fine, no driver download.

> Logitech webcam.

Mine works fine, no driver download.

> Focusrite audio interface.

I don't have one.

> HP printer (actually this one required firmware on Linux too, so that's a draw).

I haven't used a printer in probably 10 years.

> XBox 360 controller (required a driver on Windows 8.1. Maybe that's changed in the last few months with windows 10).

Nope. Not on 8.1. Not on 10. There may be an optional driver for it (may be-- I've never seen it), but it's certainly not required. This one I can firmly say you're wrong about. (Unless you have like a Chinese knock-off Xbox 360 controller-- the brand-name ones work.)

I had a great experience the other day when I plugged in my ancient CanoScan LiDE 200 scanner I bought back in the Windows 2000 days, and it worked flawlessly in Windows 10, no drivers or software needed.
A number of issues can be found here[1]. Among other things, they allowed domain validation on unprivileged ports and issued certificates for "parent" domains when subscribers were able to validate control of a subdomain (i.e. you could get a certificate for github.com by controlling user.github.com).

[1]: https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:WoSign_Issues
Why is that being considered anti-competitive here ?

It seems like they are participating in a competitive marketplace by offering to pay and being awarded the coveted spot as an equal participant rather than using their position as the upstream to force their way in.

Certainly they have a valuable product and deep pockets making them better able to compete here, but it doesn't seem to exclude anyone from competing on the same field.
If you're going to go conspiratorial, I'd say that the payload may be the key here.
Don't get me started on p values now, but just think about this:

"Eight young men (age 20-30 years), six young women (age 20-30 years), nine older men (age 65-75 years), and ten older women (age 65-75 years).

The results indicate that neither age nor gender affects muscle volume response to whole-body ST."

"Six women and 6 men trained the elbow flexors 3 days per week for 20 wks, one arm performing in each session 3-5 sets of 10 maximal concentric actions on an accommodating resistance device, the other arm 3-5 sets of 8-12 coupled eccentric/concentric actions on a weight training device."

"One hundred eighty-one previously inactive healthy Caucasian (N = 117) and African American (N = 54) men (N = 82) and women (N = 99), aged 50–85 yr,<...>

Training-induced increases in absolute MV were significantly greater (P < 0.001) in men than in women, though both sex groups increased MV significantly with ST (P < 0.001), and the relative (%) increases were similar. "

So, if we are to believe the first two, that were, BTW conducted on miniscule samples, and concentrated on only one exercise of a small muscle, we should expect the same muscle gain in 20 year old men as in 70 year old ladies!

I wonder why those old ladies do not feature that much at bodybuilding competitions or Olympic games...

The third, which has larger sample, actually says that there is the difference between males and females, which is in accordance with what we can see at every sports event.
I used to be a gym nerd too. My current approach: Screw common advice. Find what works for __you__. Take hints from algorithm design. Start small. Limit yourself to use variables you can influence, observe and measure. Come up with a system that embraces failure, try to make it anti-fragile. Experiment and enjoy the ride.

I'm personally quite chaotic and hate planning. Some weeks I hit the gym five days, some seven, some none. As such my training routine involves an auto regulating method which adjusts volume as needed. Periodisation (or lack thereof) is done with a simple recursive algorithm.

3/4 goes for nutrition as well. Screw counting macros, calories and weighing myself. If I like what I see on the mirror, great. If I feel that I'm getting flabby, I drop a PSMF day here and there until I look better.
Did they actually pay them or simply give them the OS for free in exchange?
Why You Should Always Have a Contract – Even for Small Jobs
Yeah, I don't disagree, but that isn't my point.
Do not be dissuaded by the downvotes -- as usual around here, they signify that your comment was genuinely funny.
If you read to the end, you need to spam 15 friends on FB to see the last page, or pay $8. I'm not in the market for such a guide right now, just curious to see what the deal was - and it's not reasonable IMHO for a guy who has been doing this for 3 months and is reproducing advice found for free elsewhere, to charge anything...

I mean check this out: http://www.precisionnutrition.com/cost-of-getting-lean-infog...

Or read t-nation.com
> Bloggers select small sized, underpowered studies to support their 'bro science' theories

There's simply no money for large, high-powered studies. We have to rely on what observations are actually possible.

However the quality of studies, especially in terms of study design, is steadily improving.

> it's hard to differentiate what information applies to natural bodybuilding

Actually, a lot of the worst studies are done with novice trainees. All we've learnt from those is that pretty much any stimulus works on someone who hasn't trained before.

Studies involving subjects using anabolic and androgenic steroids typically control for that.
> Third, it doesn't compile to C which makes porting to other platforms difficult.

Not compiling to C is a feature. It insulates us from the undefined behavior of C (signed overflow never results in UB in Rust, for example) and allows us to actually get proper debug info.
Do you think it might be because this has nothing to do with apps or installed browsers?
I have much experience with keto. For loosing fat it can be a tool in the arsenal but it is not everytime goto tool that it better than anything in every situation that some people try to make it is. As for the mental clariness, my experience is that I constantly have some kind of mental fatigue on keto, sometimes so much (after training) that I am funny to speak with (bugging out to much). That persists even after 1-2months on ketosis, cyclic or not, does not matter.
Both of the licenses used in LLVM contain the following clause:

> Permission is hereby granted... to deal with the Software without restriction, including... the rights to... sublicense

The effect of this clause is that all LLVM contributors have already consented to a chance in license, whether that change is done by you, me, Debian, or the Pope.

The only question is whether the LLVM organization wishes to exercise this authority itself. It's clear that the majority of the key contributors are in favor of it, so it seems like a foregone conclusion at this point.
Most protests are made of a mix of people. Many do so peacefully, including those whose actions might be illegal, as in cases of civil disobedience.

Some are angry, and express their anger through violence.

Some feel that despite a lifetime of struggle and anger, peaceful means don't seem to be working.

Some feel the only way to change the system is to tear it down and start over again. It's easy to do a web search and find people saying things like http://www.amerika.org/social-reality/the-revolution-has-fai... :

> Do your part — get out there and help tear [liberalism] down. If it’s part of this social fabric, destroy it. Debunk it. Subvert it. Vandalize it. Overthrow it.

For some, there is power in destruction, when there is powerlessness otherwise.

Still others are opportunists. They see a protest and decide to profit from it, or simply vandalize and loot for the lulz.

Unless there is a powerful internal leader, as there was with MLK, it can be hard to figure out who is who during a protest. It can be all too easy to look at the worst and attribute their actions to the whole.

Which you appear to have done.
Both. For the former you can start with success stories on the keto subreddit. For the latter there is decades of research on the subject. You can start with this talk: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tC_qBC1EEvw
What provision of the MIT license prevents it? My understanding is that MIT -> GPL is legal as long as the required notice is kept for MIT compliance, since MIT is a subset of GPL.
How you can tell someone is lying to you / full of crap rule #10233:

They sell you something as a pre-requisite to the thing that needs to be done.

These priorities are seriously out of whack. If you simply ate healthy (in a caloric excess) and did a basic strength training program at a gym (5x5 or Starting Strength), you would get superior results to citrulline malate and hand gripper exercises. Check out these pyramids[1][2] to understand how to prioritize your nutrition and exercise.

[1] http://muscleandstrengthpyramids.com/wp-content/uploads/2015...

[2] http://www.kinetix.bz/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/TrainingPyr...

Notice for nutrition, supplements are the smallest part, whereas calories (energy balance) are the most important. Funny how this article focuses on the least important part.

Or for training, notice that the most important section is specificity - if you're training for strength and size, you need to train the exercises that maximize the strength and size of as many muscles as possible. So therefore would you choose big movements that work lots of muscles with lots of weight to build lots of muscle simultaneously (i.e. squat, deadlift) or small movements that work few muscles and therefore influence a small amount of mass (i.e. hand gripping and crushing strength).

You don't need to pay for anything to get in shape (other than a gym membership). I'm a competitive powerlifter who graduated high school at 6'1" 140 lbs and I routinely walk around over 200 lbs now at 30, without ever having to pay for hand grippers or someone's workout plans to make it work.
Hard to be a great athlete without protein AND carbs.
$14.5 billion tax bill, not exactly a fine.

(Also, I want to write $14.5G like I would $14.5M or $14.5k, but I don't think it would be understood very well)
This is a strawman, as it has nothing to do with the performance issues I brought up against your words. Though I admit I didn't know if pepper stuff was closed-source, my intuition was that it were open source if not why Mozilla would consider using it, but I was apparently wrong on that.

Still, though, that does not mean a JS pdf reader and more importantly a JS flash player are the way to go. That if you don't want to cater only to those who can afford high-end devices, which Mozilla seemingly is not doing, seen with the target market of Firefox OS and with their motto:

> Hi. We’re Mozilla, the proudly non-profit champions of the Internet, helping to keep it healthy, open and accessible to all. [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US]
The substance of the doc is good but it gets very repetitive and almost propaganda-esque toward the end
I think you need to be blunter with what you are trying to say. Are you talking about the differences between recourse and non-recourse mortgages and the state law concerning them?
Would really like to hear the sound he refers too. Also to see it graphed on a decibel chart. Anyone know if it's posted somewhere? Will go and look and EDIT, but I doubt I'll find it.

EDIT: here I googled that for myself: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=maRTEzlSBLk
Something like a .50 BMG round has a large report and the flight time is just under 2 seconds at a mile, so anything recording audio in the neighborhood would pick up the distinct crack of a rifle prior to the pad explosion. Some of the noise can be suppressed with a big enough suppression device but the sonic boom is unavoidable. Subsonic ammo is simply not workable at these ranges; that's called 'artillery' and it doesn't have sufficient precision to ensure hitting the rocket.

You can listen to the explosion here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6isMuPfxcI

I hear birds chirping. No rifles.

update: yes, I know Elon mentioned the 'quieter bang' sound and it could well be related, but it doesn't sound anything like the crack of a rifle round.
There's a lot of snake oil in this space. Nobody has conclusively developed any kind of myostatin inhibition in humans.

There's basically a Nobel prize for anyone who does because it's the holy grail for muscle-wasting diseases. So the research is fiercely intensive.