skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I have the same features form ycmd. ycmd actually works with atom as well and also supports go.

Pushing all "IDE" features into editor-agnostic daemon is a good path for the future. ycmd is taking this spot.
The bar nights that worked are proof it's possible to get to that place. The last paragraph was the punch line, though. That's an awesome plan as I think it's something that can be improved with practice and learning but nobody starts running with a marathon.
Two things I notice...

First: before the surgeries, they have facial features that would be common in Russia but would stand out in a crowd of western europeans. It is a bit sad if this part contributes to the comment that they look weird. I think it does.

Second: at some point they start to seem obsessed with some twisted idea of looking youthful and in deep denial of their age. For example, the same faces with shorter, grayer hair would look better.
I am fascinated as how people are sharing "strategies" here... like "how to cope with people" or considering that social interactions are "transactions" and "investment".

A little empathy anyone? Like being genuinely interested in the people around you? Like having fun by listening to new stuff...

I see a lot of depressed people around there :(
> Unfortunately, this seems to be the fundamental nature of communications networks - the story isn't much different for postal mail, fax, email, usenet, facebook. Success seems to kill the network in the end.

Actually, for a variety of reasons I think postal mail is going to be around for a long, long time, which is interesting since it predated the telephone. It could very well morph into "pick up from your local mail depot" for some people though.
Study Explains Why We Arrest Moms for Putting Kids in Nearly Non-Existent Danger
Diversity in and of itself is not inherently good. That is a fact
I agree, yes, I think we are obligated to be nice to strangers in public. Fuck those people who bring their bad energy into a coffee shop.
That's definitely true. The trucks are loaded in the early AM, so the drivers can hit the road ASAP. Does make me wonder what surveillance systems are in place in the warehouse and loading areas? Or if that would even make a difference? I have no idea, never worked in a warehouse.
Grace Hopper and Hyman Rickover might be the two greatest minds the Navy ever produced.
I think it likely that if we see a significant amount of automation in delivery, the last mile will eventually see it too.

Right now, my neighborhood has grouped mailboxes[1], and anything more than a semi-flat package will not fix. Small boxes that don't fit are delivered to the shared larger compartment, which is locked, and the key is then left in your mailbox. When you use the key, it does not come out of the shared compartment, so in retrieving your delivery the key is automatically returned. I don't see why this system can't be scaled up somewhat. Automated delivery to a shared compartment which can be designed to accommodate such a scenario would be significantly easier. Want direct to home delivery by a person? I'm sure the delivery companies can accommodate you with a special type of delivery[2]. Theft might be a problem, but since these are generally in neighborhoods next to houses, and setting up a camera would be simple (and undoubtedly pay for itself in some circumstances when people contend they did not get a package), I think it wouldn't be too much of a problem.

1: https://www.mailboxworks.com/images/af-12doorcbu-lrg.jpg

2: In truth, it would probably start with the automated to shared compartment delivery being a new option that's slightly cheaper. Eventually it would probably become the norm since it's cheaper.
> I'll take the open source microservices model with a good dev team any day of the week.

Whether it's monolith or whatnot, what you really want is the "good dev team" part.
Podcast.__init__: Episode 76 – PsychoPy with Jonathan Peirce
> Personally I think the "truth" lies in between. Bigger services that cover key functional areas.

This. What the GP was talking about is something like nano-services. Who really writes a whole service stack for every function?

In addition to functional areas, I also like a service when a single job needs to get done. For example, read message from queue, do some processing, put result somewhere. The beauty of the service here is I can write it once, test it, deploy and it just works. I don't have to worry about it randomly getting broken from code changes in a larger monolith.
If you have to run them all together to get useful, testable functionality, then all you (they) have done is written a -badly designed- monolith (an overly complex, distributed one). Not a bunch of microservices.
Same here. I moved abroad and everyone here uses whatsapp. Voice recordings are extremely common and popular.

I just wish slack added the same feature, so I can drop a recording into a channel, instead of typing a wall of text.
A friend of mine shipped books to me via usps, once, one physics book was replaced by a bible. Very odd.
I wasn't implying anything, just sharing my experience. He's doing valuable work. I can definitely get him a higher rate now that he has a year of experience. Not sure I can double it. I'll try!
I watch my son, who behaves a lot like I did/do. 1. His inner imagination and dialog is often much richer than what most people have to offer. Sorry, hearing people talk about the weather gets boring quickly. 2. that inner imagination and dialog don't shut off just because people are around. You can ignore it for a while, but it gets "noisy" after a while, like a caged animal trying to get out. 3. Those quiet times alone are there to maintain sanity and balance. Give the inner dialog time to work out its thought, process the new information, figure out what you should have said instead of what you did.

My son and I are actually deeply empathetic actually, when people describe injuries I feel it with them, feelings of loss hit me hard as well. But keep all the noise in my head at bay while maintaining conversation for long periods is tiring.
I would like to propose a new variant on an old maxim: Premature microservice-izing is the root of all evil.

I've worked with an app that had been factored into half a dozen microservices. Each of these needed two EC2 instances for redundancy. They weren't using docker or any other container infrastructure and were treating EC2 instances as pets instead of cattle, which meant that a LOT of effort was spent maintaining the dozen or so instances. Each of these instances was running at < 1% load average! So in this case the microservice architecture was also costing a significant amount of money.

My takeaway: don't build an app from scratch using microservices, especially if all you're splitting apart is web handling which is almost never going to be where your application spends a significant amount of time. Instead, build apps in the straightforward monolithic way, and only split things out into microservices when there is a very clear reason that has been identified from performance monitoring or some other metric gathering.
In that paper it sounds like the algorithm is finding true relationships that the author doesn't like. What's the problem with the algorithm?
I've only heard of one example of the cardinal directions being used as a main orientation reference in day-to-day language: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/29/magazine/29language-t.html...

I never read the research about this but examples are http://anthroweb.ucsd.edu/~jhaviland/Publications/ETHOSw.Dia... and http://pubman.mpdl.mpg.de/pubman/item/escidoc:66622:3/compon... (very interesting stuff!).

Edit: I would highly recommend reading the 2nd paper (which includes some practical experiments testing how Guugu Yithimirr speakers thought about and remembered spatial positions and orientations). It's astonishing.
> Just because you don't like a licenses obligations does not make the license cancerous.

Considering that I often hear GPL (and other copyleft licenses) described by its proponents as a virus, I don't think the disease metaphor is out of the question. The whole idea is that to maintain license compatibility in derivative works you need to propagate the license.

I don't feel strongly about copyleft, though I generally don't use it for my own works.
That's becoming more common but is not universal yet. Phones often still are subsidized, even when the buyer is still paying something for the phone.
+1 for the effort, but no.
There was alternatives to Internet Explorer when Microsoft got hit with the monopoly lawsuit...
Microservices are useful when there's inherent isolation between the data used by each service. If they talk to totally different databases, and you don't have to do atomic updates across service boundaries, why not?

Our DARPA Grand Challenge vehicle in 2005 was all microservices. There were tasks for each sensor, a location task which integrated AHRS, GPS, and map data into "where are we now", a steering task, and a planning task which took in the sensor data, built a local point cloud map, and issued steering commands. There was also an emergency stop task monitoring the radar and able to stop the vehicle if it detected an incipient collision, independent of the mapping systems. The non-hardware tasks could be run separately, or in a simulator, and we could tap in at a boundary and log.

This was all QNX, hard real time. This part of the system worked quite well.

Synchronization was unusual, in that the sensor data all came in at different times depending on the sensor. So we timestamped everything at the millisecond level, and interpolated between sensor frames to get values for all sensors at the same instant. The overall update rate for planning was 100ms, rather slow by modern standards.
A nonrandomized cohort and a randomized study of local control of large hepatoca
LOL. I've setup a situation for tomorrow where I absolutely can't bail because of how I set it up. I could have done it another way but chose to take on some responsibility regarding an event. I can't bail without being a total asshole. Otherwise, I high chance I would not go.
When I saw this question, I went to find a link so that I could recommend Patrick Healy's reading. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it now available for free on the internet.

It's quite rushed and somewhat flat at parts. Some of the abridged recordings I've listened to do more justice to the excerpts they've chosen. But it's a heroic effort none the less. For me, it made the full Wake accessible and alive in a way that made me really enjoy spending time with it.
Transaction fees are really a function of transaction size in bytes not per transaction. Adding an additional input address increases transaction size by 180 bytes. The output address and other common overhead is around 44 bytes. The current minimum cost of block space is 0.0000001 BTC per byte if you are willing to wait several hours for your transaction to confirm. At that rate adding an additional input will cost you 0.0000180 so anything less than that is not worth moving under current conditions. To be confirmed in a timely fashion you need to pay a per byte fee of about 5x so in reality amounts under 0.00009 are currently not worth spending.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/1195/how-to-calcu...

https://bitcoinfees.21.co/#delay
These are shitty glasses that are already being billed as <$150.

This is not even remotely "Versace" - it can't possibly be.

Imagine pimply-faced teen nerds wearing these.

They will not even attempt to go for a "luxury" / "high-end" feel. Snapchat is not even remotely Apple.

Relax for a moment and come out of your fantasy.
Really incredibly high rank for a woman in the military.

I only recently learned Grace Hopper was in the Navy. It is nice to see this decision.
It can still be useful to do a polynomial regression on log-log data that doesn't quite obey a power law.
We have a good understanding of the error profiles of most ML algorithms. We can put tight bounds on the difference between predictions and validation data. If ML algorithms make mistakes, it's usually due to noise or low-quality data, not the algorithm itself.

There is no reason an ML algorithm would be biased against a "protected class". It doesn't know what those are. It's possible that the algorithm will uncover a truth that you don't like, like that there as differences in risk profiles across race or gender, but that doesn't mean the algorithm is incorrectly biased. It just means that reality is at odds with how you might want it to be.
Between tcpdump and Wireshark, my network analysis needs as a sysadmin are covered.

When I used Solaris, I used "snoop" which is now open source through illumos.
I don't know but people do it all the time when receiving large quantities of narcotics or merchandise paid for with stolen credit cards. You write "return to sender" on the parcel and leave it unopened by your front door. Sounds like a bad urban legend akin to "if you ask an undercover cop whether they're a cop, they have to tell you" but plenty of people still do it.
Underwater ejection from fighter aircraft [1965, YouTube]
LOL. And i turn into a pumpkin (read: blithering idiot) at 10:00 pm at the latest if it's evening. It's just social exhaustion.
It's kinda cool how different sites develop different dialects and tones. HN's conversational tone is probably the least fun/humorous I've ever encountered on a website, which is (obviously) good in some instances and bad in others.

What would it take to shift a website's tone? What factors, both technical/website-related and people-related, determine how the tone comes across? Food for thought.
Great way to put it. The very definition of a microservice is that it does ONE thing independently of others. The number of dependencies should be kept as low and to as few points as possible.
Perhaps the investment cost is less.
The phone-sized early termination fees put the lie to it being any sort of subsidy.

(for "subsidy" to be a reasonable description of the flow of funds, the phone company would probably have to be losing money on the most expensive phones; of course they aren't. They provide the phone up front with a minimal payment, but they have structured the monthly fees to more than cover their costs for doing this.)
Given that set of criteria, I wonder how many good projects there actually are out "in the wold".

I would suspect that a small percentage of all projects undertaken are good, according to these criteria. Yet I can't help but think that, while these good projects might engender an enjoyable experience for all involved in its' development, that it wouldn't necessarily lead to a successful product in the marketplace.

What I'm getting at is I wonder good project, while nice to work on, leads to a good product. I am guessing most products probably didn't arise out of a good project, so from a business standpoint, how much is it worth to worry about attaining all these aspects.
Source? I've lived in CA for over 12 years, and most of the homeless I talked to were out of state (a lot of NV and AZ).

How is this claim "malicious"?
Exactly. A related issue: the console in most cars disables many functions while in motion, such as the ability to dial a phone number or change settings. That prevents the passenger from doing so as well.
Certainly, but your user@host will be leaked to the staff of Github / Gitlab and to anyone that compromises your account. The unfortunate thing about anonymity is that a small mistake can be costly. It depends what your threat model is, though.
From what I've noticed, when people refer to 'the' blockchain, they usually mean the Bitcoin blockchain.
Yeah, probably important you go, then.

I personally bailed on my previously-determined weekend plans because I'm still recovering from a cold, and 36 hours of techno would dramatically set back my recovery.

I was hoping for social plans tomorrow and I received an invitation to the beach, so I'm looking forward to that. Gotta get my friendship hours in while it's the weekend, because other than a yet-unplanned date, I've got nothing every day after work next week.
I know what you're saying, but if I do get free time again it will be to play the QFG series again! I'm very letdown with contemporary gaming and felt the best titles came out in the late 80s till the 90s came to a close.

The arcade focused stuff that came before was good and impressive (who as a child was NOT impressed standing in awe in front of Rampage circa 1986) but wasn't exactly deep. And the stuff today is almost entirely rehashes of formulas created in the late 80s or 90s.
It's why I've given up on "high end" gaming rigs and now use a Skull Canyon NUC (and a Wii U, Nintendo still has the touch).
That's indeed what I remember as well, but in at least one of the sequels it made sense to transition to a fighter to gain the paladin powers on top of the rest. Playing for maximum freedom was actually incredibly constraining in certain ways; I vaguely recall that you get forced by class into a specific endgame for Trial By Fire.

I have to mention to anyone who stumbles across this comment that there have been remakes. The QfG1 remake in 1992 was okayish, but I personally preferred the 16-color version in all its limited glory. But the QfG2 remake in 2011 was worthy of multiple replays just like the original was:

http://www.agdinteractive.com/games/qfg2/homepage/homepage.h...

QfG3 is still playable via DOSBox if you can get a copy of the software. I want to play QfG4 again and I unfortunately have never played QfG5 as it landed when I was broke... but I did get a copy of the soundtrack via some filesharing network at the time, and Chance Thomas's work on that soundtrack was absolutely gorgeous.
Just the title of this article is painting a broad picture. Why is it always a binary choice to be introverted or extroverted? Or introverted or just rude?

One thing I have noticed in tech in the past 10 years is that there are more and more people drawn into it who are more extroverted than introverted. This may partially be explained by the increasing appeal of being a geek in today's popular culture/zeitgeist. Being a geek decades ago was not cool. Now, it is almost sort of accepted to be a geek, to the point where some people will try to seem geekier than they really are. Honestly, I don't give a damn about "Doctor Who".

For me, if you really want to "control the conversation" like another commenter said, you don't have to do that. Just take the lead. It is not about being an introvert or extrovert. Be someone who invites people out to do something or asks people if they want to be introduced (and then introduces them - yes, it is not so binary as this can't be an e-introduction v. personal face-to-face introduction). Be more active, less passive.

As I've ranted before, introverts are not always introverts. As Susan Cain talks about in her somewhat-too-popular book called "Introverts", the brilliant Professor Lewin (before he was rightly discredited and tarnished by his sexual harassment problems) proclaimed himself a performer and an introvert. There is no black or white. Everyone has fifty shades of extroversion and introversion in them.

Stop this divide and conquer. Just be yourself. If you don't feel like going outside for three days, just do it. If you feel like social interaction is binge liking your entire facebook feed, go for it.

If to you, you feel it is a net loss to go out to certain social outings, then you have a choice. It can be a net loss, if you are stuck in your head the entire time and thinking 'what do they think about me, what do they think about me' the entire time like a skipping CD. It is all in your head. We all make stories about the world to provide 'evidence' that the world is like X. However, it seems to be, through talking with my extrovert friends, that they don't even have that beat poetry selfish mantra in their head - they just talk to people and find out what that other person is like. Talk to that cute girl or cute guy or 'they'.
Disclaimer: No suggestion anyone I'm responding to does any of this...

Weed sometimes helps, sometimes hurts, but usually hurts. The weed isn't helpful even if just meeting a couple friends for a beer who know I'm stoned. They aren't stoned so we're in a different space and it's harder to connect, leading to me getting left behind in the conversation. Not intellectually but more emotionally as in why less eye contact with me? I asked about it and sure enough, the answer was what I expected. And these are people who do do it occasionally so even for them they'd rather deal with me not high.

Alcohol usually hurts. The ceremony of having a couple drinks with friends is the drinking together so it's not helpful to be halfway there already. And if it's non-drinking event, see above, same kind of problem. I find too much alcohol to be uncomfortable so I rarely go that route to prepare but I can see how it could seem appealing for people who like it more than I do.
I've used https://microworkers.com/ before (many years ago) and seems to do the job quite well.
Am I on the spectrum, or does this...

> At first, saying “no” to fund-raisers and coffees brought with it a keen, almost illicit pleasure. What freedom! I started slipping out of meetings and school assemblies at the first possible moment instead of staying to chat. On one delicious occasion, I sat in my car and read a book while my children attended a family-oriented athletic function.

seem like perfectly reasonable behavior? I couldn't care less if someone I knew did this. I had no idea saying no to coffee was rude.

Presumably, if you break one of these rules, e.g. by saying no to some big gathering, you'll be offending someone. This would seem to suggest that there are people out there industriously keeping track of who fails to show up to gatherings and holding it against them. Really? Here, at the end of a century that saw the perfection of human flight, two world wars, and ongoing efforts to make us a multiplanetary species?

If not dragging myself out to spend several hours making small talk is rude, can I just be rude?
It's only two letters different, and "cyber building" seems far less plausible of a term today than "cyber bullying", so that's easy to explain - the "mental autocomplete" did the same thing for me too.
Keynesianism is in the midst of its death throes.
This is why I get all my packages shipped to work. Since it's a business, they're guaranteed to get delivered and signed for.
What's wrong with doing pure research as a Startup?

Because there is no reliable way to fund it. Said another way, the time horizon for repayment is too long and too risky for traditional, non-corporate, non-public investing.

Lets assume you have a breakthrough with research, now you have to make a product to sell. Which means you need to likely build a new market, or even in the best case of an existing market change the team composition to fund product development.

Those are all risks that Banks and Venture Money (except in very rare cases) aren't willing to take.
2 Awasome Ideas Can Help Your Life
Everything You Ought to Know About App Cloud Mobile
I attempted S+F but there was a girl imvolved. Neither worked out.
Absolutely it works that way. Nobody has a formula for coming up with jokes, they usually try different ones until people laugh. Guess and check. Exactly like taking SHA-256 hashes based on the Merkle tree until the hash, taken as a number, is less than or equal to the target.
Introversion/extroversion are a scale. There are varying levels of introversion and social anxiety.
We will look back at the late 20th century/early 21st century and facepalm about all the horrific stuff we've done in the name of 'psychology', 'education' and 'safety'.

I feel like there has never been a more vile and aggressive attack on common sense than these days, in the sense of a regression, rather than a progression of common sense which one would expect with a growing body of science.
Have you tried advocating to change it? I know it's difficular particularly in "enterprisey" environments but sometimes someone will listen...