skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry, when alien abducted me they did something to my brain.

Every time I try to warn others about them all that comes mi munt ot si emaningalss biggerish. well, thanks obama
We don't host any non-binary downloads so: no.
We can make them available on request. Email me.
The stories entrepreneurs tell themselves every day [PART 3]
What you also have to appreciate is that the fee scales you mention are for you investing $10,000 with an active manager. If you're investing billions you won't be paying anything close to that. If you have the world's largest sovereign wealth fund you're operating at a scale even larger than that.
As I've mentioned before: I'm afraid that's a problem for ROS to solve, not Homebrew. We make these options available to you regardless of whether you choose them. Sorry!
does it support privatekeys?
Its not in the interests of the monopolist to put their suppliers out of business.

They can set up non-profit-driven suppliers, but it seems probable that normal for-profit suppliers will flourish.
With Gallium the "outer layer" is compiled whereas with Electron end users can take a look at the scripts (there's some ways to mitigate it, but still, it's not compiled into a binary).

This can be useful if, for example, you want to deploy this as a commercial software and do some checking against piracy...

Which leads to: there's still no licence attached to this cool project ;)
Rewriting the entire project in non-Ruby would require a lot of time and create a lot of bugs for little benefit for most users.
> Finding natural patterns of associations in data is a totally reasonable starting point for finding a causation _when a causation exists_.

So if a causation turns out not to exist then finding natural patterns was an unreasonable starting point? What would have been a reasonable starting point in that circumstance?
Not idiotic, just completely against Apple's interests.
Representation of Non Western World in Process of Creation of Web Standards
We do tell you about it before we start recording any analytics.
my impulse on this forum would be to say: create a pull request; but i felt compelled by the importance to at least make your concern about the light degradation known

i sent an email through the contact link suggesting they note this in the instructions and video

if you have any other helpful knowledge i ask you to share it with this group
We're working on it: https://github.com/Homebrew/brew/issues/620
At least it doesn't seem like the Plan9 fanboy section of the Go adopters would be inclined to use this.
...and that is true.

When was the last time you monitored what parts of your system were truly I/O bound and not just blocked on another task?
I'm turning 30 soon, and my female friends seem to get invitations to look at someones newborn. I sure don't any of that.
Oh, so it's a suggestion, just like cooperative multitasking back in the day.

What could go wrong?
My only beef is when the law comes down hard on language, as per the Italian courts (or minitrue). People arguing about acceptable language (or, essentially, what is ethical and what isn't) is not a bad thing.
> But I can't imagine a lexer would ever be the performance bottleneck in a compiler.

one rather trivial way to observe the effects of avoiding building a source file is to use ccache. ccache avoids the recompilation (even if you do a make clean, or some such), and it is not uncommon to observe speed ups of factor of 5 or so.

however, once you have crossed that barrier, you hit the linking wall. which is where you would end up spending a large portion of time. gold (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold_(linker)) optimizes that i.e. supports incremental linking, but unfortunately, i haven't had any experience in large code-bases where it is being used.
yes... in ~25 years in the business, over ~10 companies.

..and I can tell you that precisely none of them performed a correct analysis of a systems concurrency needs before 'designing' it.

A common artifact of this is far too many tasks.
Which is a mild way that our education is poor since rewarding status over competence.

Would parents sending their kids to Ivy leagues accept a kid from downtown going to public school being given a better recognition as theirs?

We let parents influence education, and let schools bend the «natural» competition in order to satisfy influential parents.

This cannot happen without regulations to tie diploma to a job. Without academy's and authorities. The first winner in the bending of the knowledge competitions all other the world are the kids of teachers.

There is a worldwide corruption without bribe of teachers achieved by a social pressure.

What could be done? Burst the educational bubble?
Probably too late to really contribute, but either way -

I feel like health is a degenerate case of free markets. In any free market, the price is set by the consumers assessing their utility for the goods or services purchased. In cases of pencils, productivity software, energy, raw materials, etc, consumers compare the methods of resolving the need, or at baseline the cost of not addressing the need.

In healthcare, there are lots of situations where the cost is X dollars vs literal death. Of course, death is not an acceptable alternative, so an acceptable X ends up being very, very high for the treatment. Most people would pay their life savings to treat themselves of any life-threatoning ailment.

I honestly believe that free markets setting prices is good for most industries, but I cannot see it working in situations where the benefit categorically supercedes any amount of money.

It seems like we need to either rethink IP law surrounding healthcare, or have a monopsony (single payer or something else) setting prices.

This is a hard thing for me to resolve, as somebody who normally likes a libertarian approach.
Google Brain Resident 2017
It's not hard to come up with a working green thread system, I've done that in a VM I'm developing for fun, but the crucial question is: Does it distribute the fibers over native worker threads?

That's my problem with most scheme implementations, they are great for single-threaded concurrency but require nasty hacks like Racket's 'places' for using all available CPU cores. The only fast multicore scheme I'm aware of is Chez, which has other problems, though.

Does Guile do better than Racket with that respect?
The best form of insurance is self insurance, if you have some money on the side. Instead of paying someone to insure the risk (and get rich on top of the rent), I allocate a reasonable amount (5 figures) and put it on the side, and take the risk on myself.
Do you mean the monopsonist? I am not sure that I would define the governments who provide drugs to their citizens as monopsonists or monopolists outside of being monopoly suppliers to their own subjects.

I agree that the 'internationals' who control domestic drug consumption have little incentive to set up their own drug production systems, but if my supposition is correct, they need the US to keep paying higher prices for the same drugs.
Funding open source scientific software is a huge part of what the NIH does!

Unfortunately there isn't a requirement that the code developed under grants is released as open source, but there is a lot of movement to make it so. Furthermore, researchers have strong incentives to provide reusable software implementations of their research. (I know many people say the incentives run against this, but it is now clear that useful software gets more citations and scientists forget so at their own risk!)

I don't have a recent budget handy, but at least 10% of research funding is going to various forms of software development. I am happy to be shown wrong but 10% seems like a low estimate as literally all analysis is mediated by software. It's not like people crack out slide rules when they get a data set from a sequencer or mass spec. They go to GitHub and download some obscure domain-specific open source analysis package. Point being: a tiny administrative change could ensure that we direct $3B a year to open source scientific software in biomedicine! And further, it nearly looks this way already.
Remarkably well. Because there's no macros or templates and not a lot of type inference in languages like Java and C#, it is very easy to look up the type name of an identifier.

Then, because in e.g. Java the fully qualified name of a type is forced to have a direct relationship to the directory structure¹, the IDE can just look up the .class file in which the type was defined. If the .class file doesn't exist or is outdated, the IDE recompiles but it only needs to do this once and then it can cache it. This .class file itself is a small file of JVM bytecode that allows very fast lookup of all its methods and attributes and whatnot.

This means that it's not a search at all - it's only a lookup (look up name of identifier, determine file location, look up definition), and project size hardly matters.

I often wonder whether they realized how easy they were making things for IDE builders when the Java team invented this stuff 20 years ago. If not, it's a pretty lucky hit and it works great. .NET, even with the benefit of Java-hindsight, didn't do this as well. Assemblies are nice but they make lookup and recompilation a bit more messy.

¹) nitpickers will complain about .jar files and the classpath, but you can look up once which types are in which directory or .jar, cache that, and you're done.
It just seems like if we had of kept the money and re-invested it... like Norway did... that we would have been much better off in the long run.
You're taking 'getting paid' too literally. All those FDA administrators and employees need to justify their fat budget by keeping themselves busier and busier. They're being paid by the taxpayer not the pharmaceutical industry.
> “A beta release of the Play store is available to users now on the Acer R11 and Asus Flip (and coming soon to Pixel 2015) and can be enabled from the Settings page,”

Not really ...
1) And maybe a massage once in a while, am I right?

2) My only gripe is that it can block the UI.

3) Not experienced.

4) Would be nice, but not a deal-breaker.

5) That's how scrollbars work on macos. You can change it with "overlay_scroll_bars": "disabled". Minimap can also be disabled via View > Hide Minimap.

6) No idea.

7) Who is stopping you?
Vishing fraud ring boss whose gang stole £113 M from UK firms is jailed
Some debt is also a good thing for a country to operate - it's populace, especially their pension schemes, will want to buy government bonds.
"However, neither Mallick et al. nor Malaspinas et al. exclude the possibility of multiple out-of-Africa dispersals." (from the commentary).

How is that one wave?
Can you really follow a technical discussion without visual aid?
This is called “price inelasticity”. When you have to choose between probable death and, well, not dying, you are willing to pay almost any price.
I've copy/pasted the code of your reverse polish evaluator in python in this interactive blog post: http://blog.klipse.tech/python/2016/09/22/python-reverse-pol...
No. He would say that the stealing is the initiation of force so use of force in retaliation is justified.
Can I volunteer to coach my son's little league team and then after the fact argue that I should get paid?
A high-performance RPC framework from Baidu
Minority Report’s Predictions Became Reality
How big are the Qt binaries?
Gallium is also the codename for the userspace graphics driver portion of Mesa.
"I then built a simple Python webserver to spin the wheels of the robot based on keyboard commands that made for a nifty remote control car."

So, not autonomous it would seem. With that and an arm, though, you could eventually get it to play fetch...
Funny this doesn't come up more often when discussing St, as it is about the same price and an old name.

How is it to use?
Just as worrying are the non-lethal ailments where people are forced to choose between X and "not-dying" and a substantial number of people will underestimate the effect that struggling on sick has on them and choose that over going hungry.

The healthcare system in the U.S. means that I consider the United States of America a second-world / not-fully-developed country: it doesn't belong in the first-world alongside those countries which look after their sick.
For starters, if you'd want to eyeball a particular location in e.g. a 100mb data file that's not plain text but common text-ish formats such as xml or json, then you'd want prettyprint/reindent and syntax highlight; and using search/replace regex interactively gives much better immediate feedback about results (i.e. if this is what you wanted) than doing the same with grep/sed.
I have my license in LICENSE.md, LICENSE.rst, etc. and they are picked up correctly. For example, https://github.com/susam/uncap and https://github.com/susam/ice.
Based on 541 interviews of Spanish people living in Barcelona, a study is able to classify 7bn human beings into 4 very distinct categories, and guess what, most of them fall in the 'bastards' category.
How can take healthcare
Not as of yet. But you can use the Windows Credential Manager to store your passwords.
Okay, and do ordinary people have/see extended medical aid kits? What is that by the way? A first-aid kit? Is it in cars, at home, at workplaces or where?
IMAX CEO Teases Future of Virtual Reality Multiplexes
Regl is a new functional abstraction for wegbl
The demo is already unlimited. People wo want to free-load (or can't afford a license) can already now user it for free.

I know there are many people who will obey the license, but would not donate. If you dual license it (commerical and GPL), they'd just accept the GPL "deal". So it still makes sense to not have a GPL option business wise.

But what about, instead of open source, they make it "source open" or "source available"? Here is the source, you may not use it unless I die. Or you may use it, but not sell it. Or you must contribute changes back if you release a changed version...

They have no big trade secrets in the source. They already rely on the fact that customers obey licenses that they materially don't have to. So I believe they have nothing to lose by making the source available.
No claim was made about the motivation for the creation of Sunday trading laws.
> Gotta give it a shot. Maybe we won't cure all the disease. Perhaps we eliminate 85%.

85% looks wildly optimistic too. And "giving it a shot" is not exactly new idea somebody needs to be convinced in - people are giving it a shot since the idea of medicine was born, which was probably before recorded history started. If the money they use for research bring fruit - excellent, but I'm not sure money is what limits us (and that 3bn is going to fix that if it were the problem), and certainly arbitrary date and bombastic goals is not what was missing from medical research field before.
Content modification vs. metadata modification I believe.
Me too. Started with some GUI editors like Text Mate and Gedit; came to ST3 (bought a license); tried Atom; got convinced to VIM and use Emacs with evil now.
While I don't believe it's hard to see that perspective and be cognizant of it, I don't quite agree with that sentiment. Categorization itself has an immense level of usability. E.g. building steps to simulate a real human with AI. Even if like the below poster says, the spectrum may be more continuous than discrete, it is perhaps much faster to try to advance in a particular field with categorization than solely relying on unsupervised learning.
You can add decision making under uncertainty and information asymmetry to the list of reasons why free markets in health care fail.
Slightly off-topic, but I stumbled across this fascinating documentary about the massive challenges of laying the first submarine transatlantic cable (1858) a few days ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_ErFUv8HYs
This is great news!

I had a Yahoo account back in the days and can't for my life remember the password I used.
By default Tor Browser runs noscript.
I think the problems are known to many in the field. Getting to the solution for it may be trickier.
>Open source doesn't necessarily imply zero cost.

While it's true you can charge for your OSS product, all OSS licenses allow the recipient to distribute the source code (and the built binaries) at no cost. So, OSS does imply free, even if it doesn't mandate it.
Free software doesn't imply gratuity (and neither does open source)
> A big difference is that Go doesn't force you to write asynchronous code for I/O operations, JS engines like nodejs do and it's a pain in the ass.

Node also has a full set of 'normal' synchronous I/O operations (although they were added later after the async stuff).
JavaScript Community Is Madness
Central Europe’s opinion is falling (as yet) on deaf ears
ctime is when the inode or file changes in terms of stat, ownership, etc. mtime is when the contents of the file is changed.
Or once with the wrong settings or too long of an exposure. Or the operators get the scattering effects wrong...
> Everything is made from smaller components. Understand each of those components better and you'll understand the entire system better.

This. No matter how specialised you are (or want to be) always strive to have at least a basic understanding of the full stack and everything else that your work touches through a couple of levels of indirection (including the wetware such as, in commercial contexts, having a good understanding of your client's business even if you aren't even close to being client-facing) because it will help you produce much more useful/optimal output and can be a lot more helpful when your colleagues/compatriots/partners/what-ever his a technical problem. Heck, at the logical extreme a little cross discipline understanding could even lead you to discovering a better method of doing X that strips out the need for Y altogether, revolutionising how we do Z.

Of course don't go overboard unless you are truly a genius... Trying to keep up with everything in detail is a sure-fire route to mental burn-out!
Show HN: Changing and throttling http traffic with ARP poisoning
> How much of the cost savings for universal health care is a result of saying no to procedures?

My personal opinion is that we should absolutely say no to a lot of scenarios when it comes to single payer. That and we should absolutely stop providing care in the worst cases if there is a strong likelihood that the patient will not make it out alive. We spend way too much in the last six months of a patient's life holding on to every last bit of hope grasping to keep their heart beating. I've heard doctors express frustration about this as well.

> In other words, in an American military spending blackout, the game would change and everyone else would be spending a whole lot more. We couldn't simply reduce our defense spending to something comparable without significant consequences.

Consequences for us too. We have to keep spending to maintain the status quo.

I mean I get that there are certain common goal costs that we contribute perhaps a little more than our tab but it isn't nice to point it out like this. At the end of the day, we aren't spending on our military prowess to be charitable. I'm not an expert so it is likely that some cost saving would be possible. I'd welcome efforts to do that.

With medicine, I think a single payer should be able to negotiate with manufacturers and suppliers to keep costs low.

We have to rethink end of life care for humans. I'm very willing to sign a medical release form that says pull the plugs if my treatment will cost over $10M regardless of who pays for it.

But that's a different topic. This current issue with epippen is a simple issue of rent seeking. There is no way anyone could side with the company of this one. I hope that the spotlight means their efforts will fail.

Are you suggesting we spend more than we can get away with hoping the slimeball companies will reinvest their profits into R&D?
The choice in a free market is not between one specific product and non-consumption, it is between that product and all alternatives (including non-consumption). If the choice was always between one specific product and non-consumption, bottled water would be very expensive (since water is second only to oxygen in necessity for survival). If there are no good alternatives, we should first ask why that is, before confiscating property or rights from that supplier or provider. I would contend that the healthcare industry has been poorly (over-) regulated, and that government interventions have limited supply of critical goods and services, thus increasing prices and decreasing quality.
If you're scared about being told "no", don't be - you're more than welcome to purchase additional private insurance in a single-payer system to cover whatever you want. It's not a particularly uncommon job perk in the UK.

Our single-payer system covers a pile of things that low-end insurance often doesn't in the US as it is, so most people are happy with it.
Hasn't it been accepted as pretty much fact that Europa has a huge ocean for a while now?
Shouldn't Japan be a great market? People get familiarized with the PS VR and they have a thriving arcade culture.
Korean Air, Boeing to jointly develop unmanned armed choppers
Only because supply has been fixed - and not by unavoidable factors.

In this case, it appears that supply has been artificially fixed by IP laws (which is obviously morally questionable situation in the health sector).
I agree that medical research is broken in many ways. A steady stream of 'outsiders' set out to shake it up, from hedge fund billionaires that discover their kid has an incurable disease to google's calico grabbing some of the most renown industry leadership. I continue to pray for rain, but the advances from such initiatives have been incremental if any, rather than revolutionary. I would say the most impactful model to date has been the Howard Hughes Medical Institure, is focused on fundamental science discovery---where the bulk of the uncertainty lies in drug development.
I am glad to hear of MZ/PC generosity and focus on helping others. Some might take the same money and build the worlds ugliest sailboat, or endow a business school and it would be their right.
All that said, from a biotech start up biotech perspective, $3B a ton of cash. From a Pharma R&D budget, it's significant but it just ain't that much. How they will use it will matter if we are to remember this in 15 years (which is only 1-2 product life cycles for biopharma currently.)
What are you 'sharing' exactly? When did this word get redefined by corporations to mean charging a fee for a service?
Reposting from Reddit, always great to have both community feedback on it.

When I use arp poisoning and redirect the traffic I get a huge downgrade in bandwidth (200kb/s->20kb/s), do you think it's because of the packets loss % or something else can cause that ?
Tried Atom for Mac right now. Opening a tiny (10k rows) csv file took multiple seconds, opening a larger (100k rows) csv put out a warning about potentially taking a lot of time and in a second simply crashed before loading it.
Coderoulette – Pair Programming game for developers
I was a heavy Flikr user for quite a long time; until the new laws were pushed (in the UK at least) to allow the likes of google to declare 'untraceable' images as fair game for their own business needs.

It's now too easy for corporation to rip off the work of photographers, so I removed the content I had online, and will only post the odd photo to my G+ these days. Not the 'stream' of stuff I used to do with Flikr back then.
Their statements contradict the docs without explanation and are not internally consistent. It sounds more like engineers scapegoating a tool than a well thought out critique.
> at one point there were only 5 women/females from which we all come from. this can be traced in all of our DNA.

Mitochondrial DNA, not nuclear DNA. There may have been more ultimate female ancestors at the bottleneck, but only that number have had their mitochondrial DNA propagated.
The Morning Paper on Operability