skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is another example of a recurring theme where the profit motive is failing to incentivize pharma companies to create products that can have an immediate impact on saving lives or improving health outcomes. I'm no socialist, but this seems to be a real (albeit very specific) failure of capitalism. Does anyone know of a government agency that is chartered to solve these kinds of problems?
> It's sad because we should be supportive of bold companies making difficult plays

It's not wrong to ask questions in general, although you can avoid a negative tone.

This is a special case though. They make mistakes here and people will die. Asking questions and pointing out every issue is, at some point, necessary.
I would be careful to extrapolate their capabilities from that. Nobody is going to talk about the edge cases that they don't handle, but they will talk about the ones they do. It is a pretty safe assumption that anything they can't demonstrate publicly is something they can't currently handle. In other words, if they didn't show the car driving in the snow, it's pretty safe to assume it can't.

And even for the examples they did show, it would be more interesting to know the rate at which they handle them successfully. So sure, they handled the guy with the reflective vest and a huge ass sign directing traffic that one time...will they do it the next time? Will they handle the case where the construction crews aren't doing everything the way they should?
And, in fact, 127.0.53.53 already has a special use (try `dig @8.8.8.8 -ta drive` and `dig @8.8.8.8 -tmx drive`)
Why would you make that a separate service when e.g. one query on a PostGIS table can do that?
My biggest problem with keto was issues with getting enough potassium. There's no easy way to supplement it in the US, unless you get a prescription for supplements. I tried using No Salt, but I hate the taste. Lite Salt was tolerable, but I'd end up exceeding my recommended amount of daily sodium.
>Everything that isn't repairing the root cause damage of aging is going to be a much less effective way of going about things if the goal is to avoid cardiovascular events of that nature.

Tons of heart attacks before the age of 60 can be avoided simply by better diet and more exercise.

Given that, it doesn't matter if not ALL are.

Especially if the alternative is hoping for some unicorn anti-aging discovery.

>But still incremental, and to really solve the problem you have to repair the damage. Nothing else is going to do the job.

Yeah, we're still are going to age and die in the end. But the job here is not immortality, is not going down from a heart attack before that...
Confirmed that the file sizes you list are also what's shown in Safari dev tools.
What you said about cancer risk or long term safety of the whole class of those diets. Especially anything related to mortality and morbidity endpoints.

Cholesterol numbers are nowhere near the end of story, they're just markers.
Rat and mice studies are useless for this purpose.

Please correct me if I am wrong. Preferably with published larger studies. In humans.
Nice. Those specs would make a great mobile DAW.
Thanks! Yes, the current site was mostly developed around SEO reasons.
I agree that google lacks direction and purpose, but I don't believe that this is anything new. Evident it products like Wave and Dodgeball, google has a history of simply trying things out and seeing if it sticks. However, while this is annoying to us as consumers, it does seem to work in that it allows them to occasionally release useful products that, otherwise, would never have seen the light of day.
I would say that in a face to face conversation, but I'm not scared of the magic words you can't say on television.
The World Passes 400 PPM Threshold. Permanently
Listen to What the Market Is Telling You (When Your Analysis Goes Wrong)
By definition most work is routine.

And yes, for phd-level (or almost) research work into new territories, one person teams are best.
Sure, but China has also (allegedly) been responsible for many other breaches unrelated to the Google incident.
> Why?

People talk about interpreted languages being slow sometimes, now your program is divided over 1700 separate servers and instead of keeping variables in memory you have to serialize and send them over the network all the time.
The trick IMO is to have high density of lots of different kinds of jokes.
Counterpoint: most underhanded C successes look like incompetence instead of malice, but still look "wrong"
pyronite didn't criticize the simpsons for it and as you say, an individual show should not be criticized for this.

It is fair to say though, that there are more movies that fail the bechdel test¹ than there should be. If you compare it to the reverse of the bechdel test you can see there is a bias so large, it can't be founded in the preference of movie viewers alone.

I believe very much that everyone falls prey to biases, stereotypes or even outside factors like a possible gender imbalance in voice acting. I would not criticize anyone for this, because if you fall prey to something it is never ill intend. I do however also believe that these biases are harmful to society at large and in many cases could be easily avoided by more awareness of content creators.

I'm not against stereotypes, they are even valuable to get a story across, but you should be aware of how you are utilizing them.

¹ https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Bechdel_test
Yep, Game Boy was a different medium. And Nintendo's artists didn't just take the Mario graphics assets from the NES and plop them on a Game Boy; that would have looked like shit for a number of reasons. Yet that is what people do when they take the 8-bit-era Mario sprite and render it with giant squares.

Graphics assets are no more a picture than a recording of an artist's brush strokes are. They can only be interpreted in the context of a medium, be it CRT scanlines vs. LCD squares or oil-on-canvas vs. ink-on-papyrus.
> 2) The robot helps you drive, you start to zone out, and plow into, let's just say as a random example, a truck crossing your lane of traffic.

This is my concern. How many days of sitting around for 12 hours not doing anything (because the computer is pretty good) does it take before the truckers who are supposed to be alert and ready to take over are completely zoned out. I would probably last about an hour.