skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think that the feelings are probably almost the same, but they are caused by different stimuli.

I would describe a feeling when you read and understand beautiful mathematical proofs as bliss or relief (when it was hard before everything unfolds). Dopamine kick? It is just that most people don't get satisfaction from such things.
Ah, I see what you mean. I can't really speak to that from my own experience, which was that of a gay man married to a woman who set great store in the idea that she had turned him straight. (She had not, of course. She merely found him too young to have realized that what one's body says at any given time need not be taken as the final word on anything, and went to a great deal of effort to deny him that realization.)

Perhaps a place to start might be: What would we say of a man who only cares to keep his wife away from other men?
Something for me to fix. I will sort this issue out over the next few days.
News to me, despite that I think Dawkins is soft on religion. :-)

Which Christians -- and where -- are calling for the blood of their enemy because of Christianity?

How many are killed? Google tells me it was eight people in total regarding abortion clinics in the US. Over decades.

(Edit: I can tell you that the main Swedish church refuses to criticise the people oppressing, murdering and expelling Christians from Gaza and Egypt. They criticize Israel literally thousands of times more. This seems to be more because they were pirated by left wing extremists than by nazi influence.)
"In the long run, we're all dead" -- JM Keynes

These are buildings we're talking about. A city can get stuck with the wrong size units for a very long time. There's a reason things like the Parker-Morris space standards were developed, and they recommended 30m^2 for single occupancy dwellings in the UK in 1961.

The 220ft^2 apartments are 20.5m^2, not very large at all. The really tiny ones have communal shared cooking areas, which have the potential to be a social problem.

I think people are terrified of some kind of Stand on Zanzibar future where they're economically constrained into smaller and smaller spaces, and this is one way to push back.
Personally I'd never deploy a single model at the very least, when I am given the budgets for full redundancy, but ideally I'd prefer different suppliers too. I've lost too much sleep fixing problems where someone stupidly thought it was "simpler" to deal with the same everywhere. Until the same problem took down every router at once, or the same manufacturing defect caused their drives to start failing at a high rate at nearly the same time...

So it's not just attackers, but being susceptible to the same thing triggering the same bug by accident at the same time, or manufacturing defects across a whole batch or model, or affecting a part that's used all over the place.
As a European in south America, I have noticed that no one from the US says "America" when asked where they are from, they will say the state mostly or the US.

Latin Americans will use America/Americas interchanagebly

Europeans aremost likely to refer to the US as "america" one
I would say that the problem is the overprotective treatment women have lately but maybe that's a naive thought of mine (since I can't be fully in the position of a woman).
Across processes perhaps? But hash(a) == hash(a) and hash(b) == hash(b) so a dictionary that with a and b inserted will yield the same order every time.

d1 = dict()
d1['a'] = 1
d1['b'] = 1
print(d1.keys())

d2 = dict()
d2['a'] = 1
d2['b'] = 1
print(d2.keys())
git to me is a work of art. There is a lot of complexity underneath but the end user sees something that is simple, fast and easy to use. It scales depending on user needs and It's easy to reason about.

This is a feat of engineering, to take something complex and make it easy for anyone to undestand and use. It shows real expertise and deep understanding of the area.

In many ways it's a shining example against the 'culture of complexity' that we increasingly find ourselves in. Here rather than simplying the objective is to be to make thing as complex as possible, usually in pursuit of extremely niche use cases or because either the expertise or the interest to simplify is not there. If git was designed in this culture it would be fragile, full of buzz words, poorly documented and prone to failure, and something only a few self appointed experts could reason about and use properly.
Crickets?

Nice to see novel thinking carried through to example approaches.
This is what people get wrong about introverts. They assume that introverts are simply people who are bad with people.

In a group, I'm usually loud and gregarious. And it's not even an act.

Yet, I don't need social interaction to feel good. Usually, one meeting a month with friends fulfills all my social needs.
self releasing license
More generally, violence at large is declining (although perception of it keeps on increasing, possibly because of easier information sharing, or possibly because of a growing intolerance about it)

https://youtu.be/sjT4HlNJNgI
It's not at all clear that only individuals would go for the cheaper alternative.

We also already have cheaper alternatives in e.g. studio apartments, and we currently have families living in those.

I don't see how building downwards will solve these problems in a decent way going forward--it seems that it could only continually reduce peoples' living conditions.
The DPRK can be thought of as rational in that they follow reason and logic, it may not be the same reason and logic that other world leaders and states follow but that doesn't mean that it isn't there and isn't possible for Western strategists to try and factor that in.
Banks make up dozens and dozens of these indices for marketing purposes. The idea is that when a client trades with a broker, the broker provides "free" research to the client as a sweetener. That research mostly consists of dodgy trade ideas based on their proprietary "sentiment index" or whatever.

The research tends to be low quality in general. I'd guess that the researchers are treated as a cost center rather than a source of business.
Mongolia: Land of Lost Opportunity
What is the algorithm behind this?
Does it attempts to find 2 similar pages of the same website and generate markdown from the diff of their DOM trees?
Why would NK do that?
Charge twice the price of what flats were a few years ago, advertise it in China first, and ignore the new owners leaving it empty. That's the worst case that's been seen in a few places.
I love these :D A little bit childish, yes, but why so serious? :)

One can use these, for example, as an easter egg or to add some emotion to the selected item. Sparingly, of course. Surprise people when they are bored of all those forms :)

I think you should keep a list of all the sites using these, so that people can get inspired.
NY Police Car Crime Chase
The Iraq war was not really one in the true sense. It was just one country beating down on a smaller nation.

If they had the means to fight back like the Vietnamese did, it would have been a whole different ball game.
If someone is price-sensitive to the point of wanting $1 headphones, why would they pay for a premium phone like the iPhone? His thesis doesn't make sense. And you get lightning headphones in the box.
I would say that it is time to seriously consider a conventional first strike.

NK has its estimated 10000 conventional artillery pieces in range of Seoul - they will pound it to rubble the old-fashioned way. You can (theoretically) intercept a single ballistic missile, but there is no defence against a mass artillery bombardment.
1.5k log lines is how many bytes? Would've been helpful if you sticked with the same unit.
What's not rational about it? The chances of an externally forced regime change in DPRK just went down by a lot, which is exactly what the regime wanted.

Sure they will say some aggressive things from time to time, but it's entirely rational for them to remind everyone that they have these nukes and are willing to use them.
China tends to think extremely long term, both in then past and future.

For example: one of the most criticized of China behavior, that is the occupation of many parts of mongolian and related lands, is a way to prevent another Khan starting another Yuan dynasty.

Similarly China had many wars with Korea, and don't trust them (neither do the Japanese, thus why they don't move a finger to get rid of North Korea either, nevermind blatant racism in Japan, like the fact that nonasians can expect to get citizenship after about 20 years trying, while many second and third generation Koreans still aren't allowed to be citizens)
I too thought the same. That's why pcwalton's comment confused me.
>North Korea's government is simply... unstable, in both senses of the word.

Not so sure.

Never had a problem with North Korea here in Europe. Of course we're far away, but other governments also far away have indeed dropped nuclear bombs (and at Japan which you're concerned about), and have started wars all over the planet, including meddling in Korean affairs, and sponsoring some dictatorships around the world.

Heck, a far away government once ruled both Koreas as a colony they called Indochina, and another one gathered European citizens to go fight against Koreans in the fifties...

So not so sure why countries that actually did that shit should have the moral high ground or be considered less dangerous UN-wise than countries that merely want to protect their actual borders and haven't harmed anybody yet.
The Real Reason the Wells Fargo Scandal Should Scare You
Sorry, that wasn't clear.

Each log line (in JSON) is roughly 1.5kB.
I think he means 4 to 6 million log lines with 1.5 kB each.
I don't know, I'm 27 but for a lot of major decisions in my life, "what would mom and dad say about this" has been a factor.
My worry is that median violence is down but in exchange for a small chance of destroying civilization each year. An average decline in war plus a (say) 1% chance of a global nuclear exchange per year is not a good situation in the long run, but would look great up until you hit that 1%.
Can slack-fill law drive sustainability in packaging?
I'm not single. I'm a woman, even. And I have the exact same theory as he does. I expect to be able to be friends with whomever the hell I like, and my husband has the same. I don't have to spend time around his friends if I don't want to, and the same for him.

I have a good enough relationship that we can both express distrust for the friend, but that isn't something binding or obligatory to follow. If I find myself jealous, that is a problem I need to overcome and not take out on him and I expect him to do the same. I don't have reasons not to trust him, and if one doesn't trust their spouse, perhaps they should address that issue.

I'd not enter into a long-term relationship thinking this wasn't the case, honestly.
The internet consists of a lot more than business forms. I would be frustrated if I saw bouncing radio boxes when applying for a passport, but if I was playing a game or using a demo for a non-critical service, then I'd quite like them.

If a designer mis-uses them... well that's the designer's fault. People mis-use hammers, but it makes no sense to blame the hammer.

Some people do like to see 'useless crap' on some websites, and their opinions are just as valid as yours.
Perhaps humans, on average, are willing to accept a roughly constant level of perceived global suffering, and that the increasing ease of media documenting suffering is making it increasingly hard for governments to justify inflicting suffering on other countries?
Actually the reason I posted source was not because I wanted collaboration but due to fears that it was somehow phoning home with your valuable source code. I wanted resolve this issue by allowing anyone to vet the source code before rolling it out.

It's not about wanting to appear open and deceive anyone as its not an open source project. I'm open to change this in the future though if circumstances change.
Programmers might not be mathematicians or computer scientists, but they should be professionals

What? No. Many programmers out there are just working on fun projects in their spare time. I'm sure there exist some aerospace engineers doing that, but it's not many. I don't see why your average bedroom open source programmer should be treated like an aerospace engineer.
Thanks for pointing that out. I'll try it.

I'll find out what "computer-algebra guided optimizations" are I'm sure ;)
Despite what the mainstream news likes to report, there's a microscopic probability that the DPRK would attempt to use a nuke offensively.

I would like to believe that, but I'm not so sure I do. There have been plenty of people in history who have advocated a nuclear first strike: MacArthur and 'Che' Guevara being two examples. I don't feel that Kim Jong Un or the North Korean government are particularly rational.
The quoted statement should be interpreted in the context of the study. Specifically, in the context that "species’ current ranges are not always delineated by geography".

The genetic isolation of Native Americans was clearly a result of a geography.
This is not a bad idea in spirit. However, one seldom mentioned fact is that anti-Han sentiment runs very deep in both Koreas.

Transforming North Korea into a true vassal state of China may be the solution, but there will need to be a serious governmental transition in North Korea first.
There are also credible reports of genocide. That'd be reason enough don't you think?
Will they just trash their code? It is hardly going to be an asset for them and probably is unmaintained for the last couple of years.

It would be great to see them opening the code to the community.
Do you have a link to info about why it's faster? My initial reaction was that the extra indirection would slow it down, but of course that's based on nothing but general knowledge and two seconds' thought.
VAMP 0.9.0 – Very Awesome Microservices Platform
What benefit do you gain from doing all the trimming work?
Also obligatory to mention NN Taleb's rebuttal of this thesis, and the back and forth between them that followed.
Have you tried GitKraken? https://www.gitkraken.com/

Seems like there's a glut of these apps of late—not that I'm complaining! :-)
If the owner is here: with javascript disabled the code is unreadable.
What about the artillery that the DPRK has trained on Seoul? A conventional strike means the complete destruction of a city of 10m.

On top of that, where does a conventional strike leave China? Any intervention that isn't Chinese led will necessarily renew PRC support for Kim.
Samsung brings JavaScript to the internet of things
There’s no stopping the UK sharing economy
> They cannot be allowed to have a permanent nuclear deterrent.

Why not?

Your reasoning and posture is precisely why the North Koreans are justified in seeking nuclear weapons. They have a right to it.
Everyday Leadership
Textile fiber waste helps improve the sustainability of materials
Most models of phone experience reports of the occasional battery fire. Its just at a rate perhaps an order of magnitude less than the GN7. I suspect the fact that Samsung itself issued a recall is probably the main reason the FAA felt they needed to issue some kind of statement.
A very old Celeron desktop that works fine for anything else I do and any other website.
Ironically C++ often goes in the other direction: splitting up files causes all of them to rebuilt as soon as you touch a header, but combining them into a huge file gives you a huge speedup in compilation.
True for me too. Also when there is a part you already know or partly know, you can go even faster.
Actually it's nothing to do with collaboration. The source is fair source because I want you to be able to check that there are no phone home methods sending me your source code.

The GPL portion is there to ensure that if someone does use this and I loose interest or die at a specified time they can continue to use it as they see fit.

I'm not trying to deceive anyone through these decisions.
Probability of nuclear war before nuclear weapons were invented: 0

Probability of nuclear war after nuclear weapons were invented: > 0

No matter what you say, fact remains that by simply developing nuclear weapons, we've dramatically increased the chances of a nuclear war in the future.
Nice, you can't model a worm, but you can model a galaxy.
I prefer changing landscapes over wasting landscapes, Fukushima-style. There are always tradeoffs, but some are better than the others.
International Startups Will Soon Draw More Venture Capital Than U.S. Ones
I'm curious, what would you say the % of sites you visit is where they're still useful without JS?
For his own website I'm only getting:

[Source](http://fuckyeahmarkdown.com/ "Permalink to Fuck Yeah Markdown")

# Fuck Yeah Markdown
I would agree that normally governments make geopolitical decisions in a rational ways. But due to governments being emergent systems you have rare events in which individual incentives can line up to make irrational decisions happen. Look at what happened with the Brexit vote for example.
The only way to lose work with git is either to (a) not commit it or (b) run a garbage collection.
Sure there is: Conventional artillery is slow. It'll pound Seoul into rubble given time but if they actually tried it, after the first 30 minutes, one of the superpowers would glass them.

Edit: Hmm. You lot make some good points about just how many 'small' hits they could pull off, assuming that each gun emplacement has ammo etc. so I did a bit more research. Seoul Capital Area has an area of ~11,000 kilometers square[0]. Assume a generous affected blast area of roughly a hectare per shell (we're talking about shelling a population center here so you don't have to level every building to have a serious impact) and that's 1.1 million shells (if they're firing with uniform distribution, which they won't be) to seriously damage the city. Assuming a normal distribution where they all aim haphazardly for the CBD and let fly, it's even worse, call it 500k shells at a guess.

10k emplacements, if they have 50 shells each, will deliver this in (as per post below) 8.3 minutes. So yeah, even if it can't "pound Seoul into rubble" it would be a highly undesirable outcome for the South Korean people.

I take it back. Conventional artillery isn't slow if you have enough of it.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seoul_Capital_Area
See his video linked above. It's really good and its clear the guy is bright.
The CIA just invested in a hot startup that makes sense of big data
Getting to know elementary: An interview with elementary OS UX Architect
Yes across processes. You don't want to change (reseed) the hash function after the dictionary is created. (At least then you need to rehash everything.)

Seeded hashing was introduced to python 3.2.3: https://docs.python.org/3.3/using/cmdline.html#cmdoption-R

$ python3 --version
Python 3.5.2

$ python3 -c "print(hash('a'))"
6106879154137036349
$ python3 -c "print(hash('a'))"
9160572615033669802

$ python3 -c "print(set('abcdef'))"
{'d', 'f', 'e', 'b', 'c', 'a'}
$ python3 -c "print(set('abcdef'))"
{'e', 'f', 'd', 'a', 'b', 'c'}

Note that there is no guarantee that this ordering is uniformly random. (Though it probably is.)
More like "failed too much to be allowed to fail completely"

NK is such a failed state that we keep on propping up its failed regime because no one knows what to do with its 25M citizens
Usually yes - but it depends. Anything programming related I rarely like as a lecture and completely agree with you, unlike it's general concepts and then it depends, see below. I'm an avid reader, so historically I always favored reading and only the last few years did I get a more nuanced opinion with exposure to new subjects and lecturers.

On the other hand, when I took "Medical Neuroscience" [0], a pretty heavy course with 16 hrs/week ~25 hours (or was it 35?) lectures total (the 1st edition of that course - I have not checked if they made any changes to the edition online now, Coursera switched to a different course format), at least for the duration of the course I ignored the textbook [1] even though I had it. The lecturer was mesmerizing, I just started the videos and listened for hours - and actually learned. The fact that most of the time you do want to take that textbook (even for this exact same subject) is that it's exceedingly rare to find such a specimen of a teacher.

Similarly with basic physiology lectures, even though they were done cheaply and he has stopped making new ones Aaron Mullally's lectures are of the same kind, I could just listen and listen and learn stuff. I tried many different ones, all of them prepared more "professionally" (I don't like that word because the dirtiest and cheapest solution can still be more professional than the one with the best packaging, but you know what I mean, I hope).

Math, physics, chemistry, biology: It depends (so the same), I found lectures - I guess that actually means I found lecturers - that at least for me are better than learning the same from a book. Another example where given the choice between book and lecture I would take the lecture any time: [3] (and that is 100% because of the person giving the lecture).

[0] https://www.coursera.org/learn/medical-neuroscience

[1] http://www.sinauer.com/neuroscience-621.html

[2] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC0JRvRB-VkJ3yeSEdXpe9ew

[3] https://www.edx.org/course/introduction-biology-secret-life-...
Suppose you want to make something like an XML generator helper function:

def start(tag_, **kwargs):
write("<" + escape(tag_))
if kwargs:
for k, v in kwargs.item():
write(" " + escape(k) + "=" + quote_escape(v))
write(">")

(Apply hand-wavying to get the correct code.) This might be called as:

start("abc", x="1.0", y="2.0")

but generate the output

<abc y="2.0" x="1.0">

when you want it to be:

<abc x="1.0" y="2.0">

The output order depends on the Python hash implementation, which (in modern Pythons) is randomly selected during startup. For an API which preserves order, you must currently either pass in the pairs in iterable order, like:

start("abc", (("x", "1.0"), ("y", "2.0")))

or switch the API to pass in a dictionary-like object instead of kwargs, then switch to an OrderedDict (which must also be initialized with pairs in iterable order).

In 3.6, there's no need for that -- kwargs will preserve the keyword parameter order.
Amateur blog SnR gets particularly bad for a while after apple presentations.
It's possible but the scammer specifically asks the author to delete the message before his mother reads it, so it seems unlikely.
Looks like it runs the page through a readability algorithm. From there, it probably has a pretty straight 1:1 html to markdown mapping.
I had a similar idea years ago and the name I came up with was "Eventually Open".

It wasn't a case of abandoning code more gracefully per se, but simply that after a set period of time, code would be relicensed as open, regardless of the state of the business. So you might have a timeline like:

* Today: release version 1.0.

* 6 months into the future: release version 2.0.

* 12 months into the future: version 1.0 becomes GPL.

* 18 months into the future: version 2.0 becomes GPL.

* 24 months into the future: version 1.0 becomes MIT.

* 30 months into the future: version 2.0 becomes MIT.

And so on. The latest version would be proprietary but source-included, and previous versions get relicensed as soon as they age out.

The other alternative is to have the same mechanism, but with a donations system to speed up the relicensing. If your codebase is worth 30k to you, then if people chip in 30k, it gets relicensed immediately. If people chip in 15k it gets relicensed earlier than it would normally.

It's not a good alternative to open-source, but it's preferable to completely proprietary as it makes it possible for abandonware to be picked up and maintained by third parties, and it offers an alternative mechanism for funding development of code that will eventually be open.