skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Complication is the actual technical term for Apple Watch home screen widgets. It was adopted from the term in mechanical watches, where it refers to the little windows of information (date, day of week, phase of moon) other than the hour and minute.
> Whether or not they get rid of the correct employees remains to be seen

does that ever happen ?
> It won't stay that way by the time you watch it, it will have been copied multiple times, and it's on 35mm again.

No, it's not on 35mm again. I've watched the 70mm projection of The Hateful Eight. At no intermediary point the film was on 35mm.

The intermediate film stocks and the print stock are very special low-sensitivity stocks (Kodak 2383 has ISO 1.6, Kodak 5302 has ISO 6) that have no discernible grain whatsoever. You can't see the Kodak 2383 grain with a grain focuser. All the grain comes from the original negative. You do lose some spatial resolution with multiple copies, but you don't add grain. I'll note that modern print film like Kodak 2383 can resolve 550 lines per mm, and contact printing has a minimal loss of quality due to imperfect optics. Granted, a showprint will always be better than a release print, but the copying process is much better than you give it credit for.

> noise (like film grain) is always a problem

Not really, dithering is essential for all video processing. Your very clean image is actually full of noise. Without dithering, videos (and movies) would look bad.

> I suspect you are missing what never was. Digital is better on both.

Absolutely nonsense. Kodak 2383 has a D-Max or 4, giving a contrast of 10000:1. Kodak Vision Premier Color has a D-Max of 5.5 giving a contrast of about 310000:1. Yes, not a typo, one-third of a million to one. There is no other technology that can achieve these deep blacks. Digital projection doesn't come any close, the best projectors today, (the ones that you won't find in any run-of-the-mill theatre) can barely do 2000:1.

DCI-P3, the color space used in digital cinema was modeled after print stock gamut, but because of technological limitations, it's not identical. Cyans and yellow has a higher chroma on film. Green on film has a higher chroma at the expense of luminosity. Other colors are pretty much the same.

The only way for digital projection to have a higher gamut is to switch to laser projection AND to retire DCI-P3. You need a green laser to produce more saturated greens.

Digital cameras are capable of recording a larger gamut than film, but unfortunately there is no technology to display these colors outside laser projection, and you need to switch the whole movie industry to a new color space.
Well, automatics are great!
You can bind that to a triple press of the home button in Accessibility, too.
I think people rather told you that regardless what has been happened, this does not have to be in the future.
Well, when I bought it before the 4K was available, but LG is supposed to have a 4K equivalent coming in 21:9 which would have the same vertical of 2,160 pixels (giving 5,040 x 2,160). I'll get that when it comes out because I like ultra-wide versus buying 2 monitors.
Viadeo's CQRS/DDD stack is now opensource
Poor Bragi.
Dear YC, please include real estate as a category. You have many fine companies in this space.
Indeed, but what you're describing is someone acting in good faith, what I was describing is someone acting in bad faith and/or having a few marbles missing.
I have a Pebble Time Steel, and I love it. And I'm amazed at how blinding other smartwatches are.
Ask HN: What's your experience with human errror in cybersecurity?
I'm a student writing a capstone project on how human error contributes to cybersecurity breaches and hacking incidents. It's easy to find news articles and published security surveys [see {0..3}] that generally point to aggregate data, but I'm looking for details from actual IT / security professionals on their actual experiences with breaches.

Have you ever responded to a breach or incident you thought was caused by human error? Was it a problem caused by an end user (phished, spearphished, etc) or by someone else in IT (forgot to apply a patch, ports left open, system misconfigured, etc)? What's something that your organization is doing to meet and reduce these threats?

Answer any questions you'd like, thanks for helping!

[EDIT: Formatting.]

[0] - https://securityintelligence.com/the-role-of-human-error-in-successful-security-attacks/

[1] - https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/risk-management/pages/human-error-top-cause-data-breaches.aspx

[2] - https://www-01.ibm.com/common/ssi/cgi-bin/ssialias?htmlfid=SEW03073USEN

[3] - https://hbr.org/2015/09/cybersecuritys-human-factor-lessons-from-the-pentagon
Exactly. AFAIK Amazon is the only company that has a profitable public cloud atm. Dell/EMC are mostly B2B companies and setting up and managing private clouds is the next gold mine.
Add to that: never get separated so that you always have two earbuds! I see these quickly becoming an annoyance when you can find one earbud but for the life of you can't locate the other.
After studying this issue, and learning a lot more about learning and optimization, I've come to the conclusion that the best solution [1] is probably explicit racial/sexual/other special interest group quotas.

Specifically, we should train a classifier on non-Asian minorities. We should train a different classifier on everyone else. Then we should fill our quotas from the non-Asian minority pool and draw from the primary pool for the rest of the students.

As this blog post describes, no matter what you do you'll reduce accuracy. But every other fairness method I've seen reduces accuracy both across special interest groups and also within them. Quotas at least give you the best non-Asian minorities and also the best white/Asian students.

Quotas also have the benefit of being simple and transparent - any average Joe can figure out exactly what "fair" means, and it's also pretty transparent that some groups won't perform as well as others and why. In contrast, most of the more complex solutions obscure this fact.

[1] Here "best" is within the framework of requiring a corporatist spoils system. I don't actually favor such a system, but I'm taking the existence of such a spoils system as given.
>Moving around just a bit on a regular basis is enough to cause failure after a few months.

This is shocking. The only power adapter that every started to have fraying was one that went into a tight backup situation that I biked with every day for three years, plugged in and out of several times a day. There was a ton of wear on that cable, every few months I'd clean it off because of the abuse it took. And it still lasted three years.

Also, which proprietary cables are you talking about? Charging cables are the only proprietary connector on a Mac and this is an industry-wide phenomenon, not an Apple phenomenon. It's an odd juxtaposition of an extremely unusual cord experience along with an unusual opinion on proprietary cords.
Diving depth - ish.

That 50m is static pressure. Don't expect to actually dive to 50m and have your Apple Watch survive.

The reality of "50m waterproof" is that if you swim with it (pools, maybe a few meters below the surface), most of the time it'll be OK.
People keep saying this everywhere in the thread, but it doesn't reflect my lived experience at all.

I remember being a kid of about 7 and noticing that a friend was doing some "supplemental" exercises in a workbook. I looked over his shoulder and immediately saw that he was doing them all wrong. The one question I remember showed a racetrack and asked which car would finish first -- the obvious answer was that the car with the inside track would finish first. I hadn't ever heard the phrase "inside track", I could just see, spatially, that the inside track was the shortest, because it was the smallest circle, etc.

This ability to just see patterns and connections immediately (or more quickly than others) multiplied by every single new concept or piece of data you see in your life sums up to a net advantage.

If you're somebody who just "got" the limit definition of a derivative the first time you saw it, can you appreciate that there are people who won't get it immediately, and won't see as many of the ramifications as you do? Can you appreciate that there are people who can see much more complex mathematical structures that would leave your head scratching, and "get" them just as quickly?

To say that:
> Problem solving ability and comprehension levels will only take one so far if they can't bring themselves to bury their head in a book, or sit in front of a piano, or shoot hoops, for the time necessary to master said subject.

is just not that useful, I'm afraid. If everybody reads the same books and takes the same courses, the more intelligent will more through the material faster and learn it better. The world is not fair and there are not mysterious forces equalizing everyone's performance.
I bought an LG G Watch when they first launched 2+ years ago and used it for a year every day. I tried the Moto 360 (great looks, awful battery), and LG Urbane, and now I think I have come full circle. I'm using a Pebble Time daily, and waiting for my Pebble Time 2 to arrive.

The gadget appeal has worn off but I still enjoy the functional benefits which (to me) Pebble has hit the sweet spot. A vibe motor you can feel, 8-10 days of battery life, a screen that's good under all conditions (especially sunshine), water proof, tactile buttons to interact with it, great voice translation, not too bulky, etc. Sure it's not as fancy but it just does the critical things I want it to do. The Time 2 fixes a couple desires (heart rate and larger screen) and that should be about it. I think I've found the smart watch I am going to enjoy living with.

Edit: have to add that GPS would be nice too but I am willing to not have it for the battery life.
Seems that "serverless" just means AWS Lambda is involved.

For example, http://apex.run/.
I find this string pattern terrible as well. As the application grows, there are lots of reducers with lots of strings, and it gets really confusing. It feels like this is inherited from Flux (https://facebook.github.io/flux/), Facebook's initial solution to handling state.

On the other hand, you have all the state logic on reducers... If actions were to dispatch state-modifying functions, it wouldn't take long for the code to become really confusing.
Possibly a change in construction. My old, 2011 60W 13" MBP charger is working like a change. My wife's 2014 85W 15" MBP charger is frayed at both ends. I've tried to bandage it up with ResQ tape and even that is starting to breakdown.

The feeling in the cords is quite different; while mine is quite flexible, hers feels really stiff. I believe whatever change that was made, possibly BPA-free, it has reduced the wearability of their cables.
If these work as well as they say they will I'm pretty excited about them. Making the case a battery pack was a pretty cool solution to the limitations on battery size such a small device has. I was worried about damage if they fall out but after thinking about it the only time my EarPods fall out is when my arm catches the wire so I guess they should be fine.
I hope this article could share some data.

because the other day, I read an article about a guy who didn't write a single word and made lots of money via amazon self-publishing.

all he did was researching the hottest on amazon, and hired someone to write book on that topic.

the topic was about some kind of healthy diet.
Because <another communications channel> is the channel that every user already has set up with the user they want to chat with. It varies for every person, so why not let them use what is most convenient for them?

Nothing's stopping anybody from writing a walled garden site that provides a nice ui for messaging contacts you stored in an address book on top of that.
This works. We did this for developer on-call rotations (which was also a development opportunity for rising engineers). We also did this when I ran Ops.

It's not perfectly fair in the micro sense, but it's fair enough to not trip most people's frustration meter and it's very easy to administer.
I would vote for a politician that talked about this issue.
Although... Being able to do what your told is fairly necessary for a productive life.

Don't do drugs, brush your teeth, get a good education, exercise regularly, shower regularly, spend less than you make, eat healthy. Do as your told.
Considering the shortish battery life and the fact the case is a battery pack I suspect most people will always have the case with them and always put them into the case when not using them. That might limit this problem.
Wireless headphones also:

- never get tangled with themselves, my arms, legs, feet, shoes, equipment etc at my desk or running or working out or taking a dump or anywhere else

- let me listen to my music anywhere in my apartment without caring where my phone is

- never bring my phone crashing to the floor when I get up without accounting for the cable

Lots of pros and cons either way.
> Apple ~~officially~~ courageously scraps headphone jack

They are very brave.

I don't like this. Maybe I should treat it like ripping off a bandaid and just switch and be done with it.

Until you know, they scrap lightning in a few years. Then I can get another dongle or new headphones or whatever.
This is getting circular. I'm fully aware of the purpose of these certificates. The discussion was "did Mozilla make the right decision in excusing a CA that essentially decided to create an extra root CA". The result was a rogue google certificate in the wild. I guess browsers don't care that it was only intended for proxying employee traffic, after all.

I certainly think that in the circumstances, no, they did not. The Mozilla CA policy isn't some legally binding document. They are free to change it and still death-penalty whoever was ultimately responsible for these rogue certificates.
The only place these IoT things should be is on the shelves if companies are stupid enough to produce them. :(

I try to explain it always if I have change. Our houses should not leak information. This is very dangerous for the society as a whole.
Yeah. If there's one well-established option that works well, why would I convert? As it stands, there are up to 3 well-established options, depending on your domain: Slack, XMPP, and IRC.
http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/135377-watch-complications-w...

Whoa, never heard "complication" used like that before. New words. Neat.
kinda unrelated, if I want to start an online business similar to this one to charge oversea users, how can I implement the payment system?

what payment system would be available globally?
If you have a DevOps team you are doing it wrong.
Pokémon Go coming to Apple Watch, phone still required to catch 'em all
If I have a business making $100M per day using "ancient tech" that costs me, say, $100M per year, I might be interested in switching to the Lambdarific Supracloud, but my interest level will depend a lot more on the risk of failure than on any price difference.
So in 3d that becomes 3(2)/2 = 3. Quaternions have 4 parts. That's what has always made it hard for me to understand.
Super Mario Runs His Way onto the iPhone
Show HN: Free JupyterLab Hosting
A ROBUST VPN SERVICE IS THE ONLY ROAD TO ZION
Being a privacy minded individual is the first thing you should consider in the ever growing digital age.

Having a robust VPN to encrypt your personal data is nowadays, the only way to Zion.

And as we’re not looking to exhaust the “hide everything I do” reasoning; we mainly believe that a VPN is not paramount to activity that borders on illegal, but the very symbol of our right to the privacy acumen. My IP.io stands for data security and flexibility in the professional VPN understanding.

Adding an extra hop to the route between your PC and sites like Facebook, your data location can be easily camouflaged.

REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD START USING A VPN APP. NOW:
•	PROTECTS YOUR DATA
•	REMOTE ACCESS
•	IP CAMOUFLAGE
•	BYPASSING FILTERS AND GEORESTRICTIONS
•	SHARING FILES

REASONS WHY YOU SHOULD NOT GET A FREE VPN:
•	IT AIN’T A FREE LUNCH
A VPN service implies having servers in various countries. The maintenance or renting costs can amount a few figures, depending on volume.
•	SELLING USERS BANDWIDTH
“When the product is free. You are the product”-
•	INTERNET USE DATA COLLECTION
•	ADS
•	NOT MUCH SECURITY

In the FREE vs. PAID matter, its is important to understand that most legit businesses will offer 7 days of free trial, but a free connection on a indefinite period of time is sure to get its profit elsewhere; in ways that can harm your security and defeat the whole purpose of having a VPN in the first place.

We suggest you do yourself a favor and invest a good 5 bucks for a reliable VPN like the dedicated VPN you can get from My IP.io or from another reliable provider.

DEDICATED IPs

The providers that do offer a dedicated IP will charge the service as add on and will not always be that transparent about prices.
At My IP.io you can get your own static IP address for as little as $5/ month.
https://www.myip.io/#products
What I Didn't Understand as a Junior Programmer
New business idea, sell a lightning male to mini jack male cable allowing a lot of high end headphones to simply convert by replacing their cables.
There's something to be said for making something you're proud of, even if the higher quality doesn't translate to more profit.
Title link should be changed to that page. That seeed site is shady. They started the price $10 above the asking price to give the illusion you'll save money if enough people buy it. BS and gimmickry.
even compared to 3PAR or even NetApp they're crazy expensive
The only feature I was waiting for is still missing: SIM card.
It means you're not managing a server OS. You're not even building a container. You're defining a function (as in, "fn foo(a, b): return a+b") which is called in somebody else's environment, and they have complete control over how your function is run - you're not dealing with autoscaling or whatever yourself.
Doesn't Comcast do deep packet inspection? it throttles certain protocols/services (torrents is one example)
They actually did it. Those crazy bastards actually did it.
> when you can just have real functions doing setState() updates on the relevant component

Using Redux, all or almost all of your state is stored in a global repository (the "store").

Those strings should probably be constants instead, especially for IDE auto-complete purpose, but you are never generating those manually.

Instead, your components would call "action creators", who are properly named functions, which in turn will dispatch one or several actions to the store.

In your component:

actions.changeLocation(someLocation)

In your action creator:

changeLocation(location) {
dispatch({
type: CONSTANTS.CHANGE_LOCATION,
payload: { location },
});
}
> The tracking stock, DVMT, that EMC owners were given has traded pretty well since it was released, it's slightly up, so atleast people who want out of the new entity have an easy avenue.

It's trading at a 35% discount from VMW, which is pretty steep.
Indeed, as society we can make certain behaviour unlawful regardless of technical possibilities. We can imprison and isolate people from the society who act against such laws. We just have to make our minds clear what these laws should be.

My only concern is that non state level organized actors can get large advantage over the society using these laws.
I feel Apple Watch will be a school book example of Christensen's disruptive tech for traditional sport watch makers like Garmin, Suunto, Polar et al. It's not yet good enough for tracking serious training (prosumer use), but it's steadily eating the lower end of the market and in a few years it would be better than anything the old gang can make.
IMHO. The problem with on-call rotation is that people just try to push the problems until it is someone else's turn. No one is looking at the root causes. No one is making changes on the systems to avoid problems in the future. No one is building operational support in the applications (mentioned by Johnny555 in another comment).
PhD stands for Piled Higher & Deeper. Is a path of learning more and more about less and less.

(of course that isn't necessarily true, but I find it amusing)
> The DBMS doesn't interpret relations at all. It performs relational operations on them; humans interpret them (often using other software as a tool to present an interpretation.)

A database schema is a multisorted axiomatic system (each base relation is its own sort), of which the database's state is a model (in the logician's sense: a concrete interpretation of a theory). Unlike the interpretation in your head, whose only justification is your personal wishes, the DBMS' interpretation is backed by a concrete formal system: the language in which your database schema is expressed.

> In the constructed language of a particular library or database, that the instances of a Customer class or members of a Customer relation are representations of customers is part of the semantics of that language, even if it isn't part of the semantics of the host language.

This is only true if you can actually prove that your database or program's “Customers” actually behave like customers in your problem domain.
> Do you have an alternative fair and equitable way of allocating that scarce resource?

Yes. Not allocating it. What you call trying to "allocate" consumer's attention is, from the point of view of a consumer, people purposefully attempting to distract you from living your life in order to extract money from you. In all other contexts of life we would call such people "assholes". Classifieds have the benefit of consumers paying attention only when they want to pay attention.

Time is the most precious thing we have in life. Attempts to take it away from other people should be treated more seriously, IMO. It's never just one marketer - they're competing for attention just as they would compete for classified space.
Out of curiosity, have you written any software for it? I'm considering getting one, and the SDK looks attractive.
Pokémon Go Plus Coming to Apple Watch
Price just revealed, $159. Seems about $100 high to me.
Warp: convert and analyze data sets at light speed on Mac (just open sourced)
iPhone 7
I'm not sure what you expect from Mozilla. It would be nice if there was a way to instantaneously kill a CA and ensure all of its issued certificates continued to work, so that a big chunk of the Internet wouldn't suddenly break. If that capability existed, Mozilla or Google could nuke CAs left or right without even checking the Basic Requirements. But it doesn't, and so the process for handling CA inclusion is done by the book.

In this case, the book said "I guess proxy MITM CA=YES certificates are fine, as long as you're careful".
In particular, a potential patient might want to know MRSA case rates when selecting hospitals or other medical treatment facilities.
This is "giving away" as in "Loss Leader."

If a customer uses a bank's database to do their pricing, they tend be much more likely to do their trading with that firm. This is why firms like to have their models become the market standard. (Example: "Lehman Live" was used to price Mortgage Backed Securities. Unfortunately that didn't end well)
>> "- Are protected from falls by the cord"

The wire also tends to be the CAUSE of the fall. Earphones never just 'fall out' of my ear randomly.
Cough. I work there. :-)
I don't doubt that there's a wide range in people's aptitudes for various subjects. However, when it comes to the study cited, it seems there's no control sample so you can't tell what part of the outcome is really because these people are special and what is because some study identified them as special when they were children and they've gotten special opportunities ever since.