skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The only company this has worked with for me is Apple tech support. I had a duff hard drive. They told me "Well we see you've already tried the things I would have suggested to get you booting again, so let's just arrange for it to be serviced".

I try every time with Amazon and while their tech support is excellent (usually they'll bend over backwards to make you happy), sometimes it feels like you're speaking to a five year old. I've had situations where they just don't get it, or they couldn't modify an order (I ordered something Prime, accidentally clicked express and wanted to change it back to free delivery: this was apparently impossible for them). In the end I just said yes to them, cancelled the order myself and redid it the way I wanted.
I propose the following system for commenting on news sites:

-comment period open for 3 days after publication
-comments are not published until the end of the comment period, then all published at once
-you can submit 1 comment per article only

After the comments are published, then a voting/ranking system is enabled for automatic sorting, but nothing is deleted except for spam

This eliminates any back and forth arguments. It would function like an online letters to the editor.
I just flash the firmware for my users. then there's nothing but a quick bootup, and no "scary warning". take a trip to johnlewis.ie to download the tiny firmware updater. you might surprise yourself on how well you do.

If you use linux in an IT environment, you are likely maintaining your own package list and configurations anyway. spending 4 minutes untarring an entire distribution to a chromebook post-firmware-flash is pretty painless. Spending 15 minutes installing GalliumOS is brain-dead simple, should you not have the sysadmin skills.

Chromebooks are a very good idea if you want a cheap computer that can run a full desktop stack. They can even run Windows, should you enjoy dark patterns in your operating system choice.
"And also, don't forget that to use Curl products or execute Curl applications over the internet, it’s necessary to acquire and agree to a Curl license."

I haven't forgotten. I was excited to see a full-stack solution get invented that about anyone could use. Then they wanted to lock it up commercially. That killed all hope of it spreading. (sighs)

These days I'm more into pushing Opa given it brings ML-style robustness to the full-stack concept. Was good to see your project, though, as I'm all for experimentation in this space. :)

http://opalang.org/
It helps to first ask what problem the semantic web is trying to solve. It most business cases, it solves more problems for 3rd parties consuming your markup than it does for your own business.

Because most of the time, you already have your data in a structured format of some kind. So if you need to share data between your own systems, you use the underlying data, not the presentation layer. And your end users see the UI created by your markup, so they don't really care either. Semantic markup really helps other people ingest your data... so unless you intend for your data to be shared, it infrequently makes a ton of business sense to invest effort into making things semantic.

That being said, if you DO intend to share your data, and want it exposed and usable, then it does make sense to work at it. But in the grand scheme of things... where does most web content fall?
Kill Rock Stars President Explains Radio and Spotify's 'Crappy' Rate
Don't they use Disqus? Is that really a very big expense?
BPI Nite-burn 30 cápsulas comprar suplementos
NPR gets about 90% of its funding from members, grants, foundations, etc. If you have ever listened to NPR, you know how frequently they solicit donations during funding drives.

Only about 5% of individual NPR station funding comes from federal resources, and around 10% of CPB funding.

http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/dont_forget_the_facts_abo...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPR#Funding
> the Facebook requirement with its real-name policy could go some ways to curtailing that kind of dialogue.

This was the theory was for a while, but empirical evidence has refuted it. People are just are bad or worse when posting under their real names, and it's not just an anecdotal feeling anymore: https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160729/23305535110/study...
Who is the victim of the crime? You are blaming the victim for behavior of other people. If it wasn't obvious from my two city examples, quite a lot of Walmarts don't have this problem.
Litmus and Microsoft Partner to Make Email Better
The irony is that your comment is directly below this (equally useless) one:

>I wonder how many comments said something about "Obama" or "left-wing"
"Yes, you can create websites and applications without JavaScript. Everything that is possible in JavaScript can be done on the server side."

Is this article a joke ? Dude, can you show me some animations done server-side, mouse interaction, etc.
The problem of analysis like this is all of the things you leave out that many other people consider valuable.

For example, a complete calculation for you might look like:

Driving the quickest 4 door sedan ever made: $0

Driving the safest car on the road: $0

Driving a super peaceful and quiet car: $0

Driving a car without a jerky transmission: $0

Having a ton of cargo space: $0

Reducing emissions: $0

Fitting 7 people in a car (5 adults + 2 kids): $0

Not supporting the oil industry: $0

Not ever having to stop at gas stations: $0

Supporting a company driving innovation in battery storage and automobiles: $0

----

TOTAL value of driving a Tesla vs. Camry: $0

For me, for all of the above numbers, make the numbers large enough where the Tesla is cheaper than the Camry.
I'm sorry, but respectfully, you've provided neither forest nor trees. I'm not an academic researcher either, but I feel as if I'm one of the few people on this thread that has heard of a varroa mite, or knows apis mellifera's actual role in the North American ecosystem. All I did was look stuff up. Can't everyone else do the same thing?

The 2006 date cited for CCD isn't the government acknowledging CCD. It's the first published reports of CCD in commercial colonies. It's not a giant conspiracy.

It's also worth knowing that overwintering losses stabilized after 2006, and commercial populations hit record numbers afterwards.

Clearly, there are bee stressors other than "colony collapse disorder". But beepocolypse advocates use the term "CCD" as a cudgel in any discussion about stressors or population losses. No, can't do that.

I don't need perfect data. Any data will do.
They are not, and they shouldn't be.

The argument I was against was that LinkedIn should bear the cost of scrapers, and if they can't they must change their monetisation strategy to something that can.
Your web hoster should integrate a way to automatically get certificates. Many already do. If they don't offer that you may want to consider using another webhoster.
That's not how it works. The desire for children to not be there is so you can concentrate and do your job. Children being children is going to be distracting to everyone, and cause a drain on everyone else's productivity. Not to mention that having small children around would likely cause a number of people to search for alternative employment.

EDIT: This is in response to the idea that one has to respect parents wanting to have their children at their desks. I'm fairly certain the photos in the article are stock photos, and I'm fully in favor of having a separate day care facility.
Yeah, this is why the "You won’t need many" line is where I stopped reading. Developers who say "most of your LIs are gonna be indented" and "most of your elements will need a top/bottom margin" or "your font sizes will all be relative to the font size of the container" aren't building even slightly complicated UIs...but that doesn't stop them from passing around these "just write CSS, dummy" posts once every few months.

If you write CSS for your personal blog and want to mass-apply styles to save time, go for it, but I think the majority of people who write CSS as a part of their daily work will find that this attitude creates more headaches than time savings.
Twitter does not allow for conversations in the same page of the article, which is part of the appeal. (And Twitter's recent changes make it hard to track conversations even on the website)
Plus, in a meta argument, NPR itself only serves a small slice of the overall US audience -- should it be shut down too?
Yes but he would be shutdown instantly if he used "Amazon" in the url
While true, this also gets into the ethical, moral and legal obligation a company has when for all practical purposes they have a monopoly on a market segment.

This type of action is what got MS is legal trouble in the EU and US in the 90's
Were NPR engaging in "mass censorship" before they introduced online comments in 2008? They are just returning to the status quo of the rest of their 38 year history. You are still free to comment on their stories in alternative venues, exactly as you are doing here.
Partially funded by gov according to their own stats[1]. 11% from the corporation for public broadcasting, and another 5% from local governments.

And on a side note, the trend away from open forums in the name of "civility" bothers me on a pretty deep level, but I don't see the connection between that and 16% of their funds.

http://www.npr.org/about-npr/178660742/public-radio-finances
for bid : 1DVm58QvyRksyRtzHvbo6UyEt4fZYMWXFQ
Which is, of course, precisely their business plan.
Nvidia  – significant increases in parental benefits for employees
Maybe. You'd need to understand the universe before you can answer in the affirmative.
Wait, what? This is Hacker News, where bringing your seven mangy dogs to the office is practically required. I know they get in the way of the ping-pong sometimes, and gnaw on the cables for the PS4, but you can just feed them some snacks from the jerky dispenser if they bug you too much.
It is important to note that the front page says "works without JavaScript", but the rules say no libraries. Vanilla JS would appear to be OK.
In all fairness, NPR's reporting is of exceedingly high-quality, by journalistic standards.

I admit that the comment you're replying to is flippant, but NPR does check its facts quite well.
Our daycare in New York City which provides care for kids from 4 months old to kindergarten age, requires parents to bring their own food in.
I'm assuming you think I'm a homeowner, then?
No? That would be absurdly stupid for Reddit in terms of engagement.
In 2012 federal funding accounted for 10.9% of revenue for Public Radio.

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NPR#Funding

Alternate sources:

1. http://www.cjr.org/behind_the_news/dont_forget_the_facts_abo... It contains some handy pie charts for both Public Radio stations and NPR.

[2] http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/13/taxpayers-provide... An analyst claims that 25% of NPR's funding is from taxpayer sources. This claim is disputed by NPR's public relations spokesperson.
THIS is the new "new" Microsoft.
It's hardly bait. I'm interested to know what he considers to be "good journalism" as well, if not NPR.
We have so many tax benefits for corporations that offer employee services (health care, child care, retirement savings) -- why should these tax benefits be tied to employment and not be universal? Why is childcare offered by an employer to an employee deductible, but, not when the employee purchase it directly? Why does a 401k have such a higher pre-tax maximum compared to a personal IRA? Why isn't personally purchased health insurance deductible?
So something like a multi-niche thing?

Where each niche gets it own page, with posts and comments?

Might catch on. We can those pages subreddits...
> Specifically, when prompted with a Windows 10 update, if the
> user chose to decline it by hitting the ‘X’ in the upper right
> hand corner, Microsoft interpreted that as consent to download
> Windows 10.

So what? I clicked that X multiple times and it didn't _install_. It may have _downloaded_, I'm not sure, but did not install.
Your comment is strictly speaking, a generic and useless meta-complaint.

Is the OP correct or are they not? If we want to have a discussion, let's start there.
In my ideal situation, if I write a function, it's immediately usable wherever I want. As long as it's fast, reliable, scalable, inexpensive and all that jazz, I don't want to think about support infrastructure. Doing the infrastructure yourself has no benefit if it's done right - it's not the end goal.

So server-less is closest to that ideal. Containers are better than VMs because they are faster and lighter weight. So much so, that people develop new ways of working that would be cumbersome with VMs.
Given that the column notes that only 0.6% of visitors comment, but that the costs can run to twice what is budgeted, they seem to explicitly and transparently acting on that you mistakenly claim are being hidden by "bogus" arguments.

I suppose the charitable assumption would be that the parent is a subtle meta comment, designed to call into question the notion that discussion is valuable.
I am not a security expert, but it doesn't seem that hard to figure out how this is being done. Lots of money to an insider/spy/human that has access to the places one would like to install said malware. Most of these stories seem to involve good, old fashioned social engineering. Albeit, social engineering with with lots of money or another kind of leverage.

Or... maybe I am naive. I just tend to look at this stuff with how can we get this done the easiest way??? Human emotions are much easier to target than silicon.
I agree, this is an unsolved problem for the web.

Unfortunately at least 90% of internet comments are trolling, vitriolic, ignorant, generally useless, poorly written, unhelpful, add nothing to the topic, and basically serve as web pollution.
I'd love to know too. If I had to guess it's something new.

They also have the newish API gateway service fronting Lambda.

It wouldn't make much sense giving users their own EC2/HAProxy thing for these more dynamic load balancing services.
I appreciate what Let's Encrypt is doing, and have even donated, but internally at our org (as a DevOps), I cannot sell certs that expire every 90 days; $300/year for a wildcard cert is a small price to pay for 1 year expirations.
Yeah. I stayed home from work a few weeks ago to take care of our six month old, as her daycare was closed. I told work that I would be OOO, but would work if possible.

Not possible. Kids require a lot of attention, and a lot of care. Maybe when she's older, and can entertain herself, but there is zero chance of me getting work done if I'm also taking care of her, and maybe a 10% chance if other peoples' kids running around.
Thank you for feedback.
* You are right interface provide too much. My aim is not only provide deals. I mostly use it myself for books search. For technical books I always search for English books which are published in recent years (2 years) I saved my search parameters so I don't enter again again these. Sometimes I want to sort products by most reviews but this sort is absent in most departments.
* Hidden keywords are not much fancy I agree. Sometimes I use it to find more results like wrote a nonsense word with minus "-dgeygdeuydgede" Amazon gives more results.
* It against of Amazon terms of service.
We don't need to be able to comment on EVERYTHING. Unless you actively plan to use the comments for something, I think most sites should just remove them.

It's fine to give people a outlet, a place for them to let their voice be heard. It often just misused and not a core feature for most sites. Even Youtube barely need comments.

What I believe we need is a revival of the forum sites. Give people place beyond Reddit and Facebook to debate. More 4chan and less Disqus.
In no way and by no stretch of the imagination.
This is actually a very good point. There was an article a few months ago about Twitter bots influencing the Brexit vote (can't find it atm...)
Perhaps we can use CloudFront to do hostname routing.
Which articles are you reading? I have yet to see a single article where that has happened.
There aren't any "universal" benchmark since each motherboard will implement those features differently, different chipset, differently bandwidth allocated to it (USB 3.1 supports from 1 to 8 or 16 PCIE lanes IIRC) even things like the length of the traces can affect the performance.

So you'll have to check for benchmarks for individual motherboards by make and model, not all reviews cover USB 3.1 or NVME since many of the reviewers don't even understand that those features can behave substantially differently so googling AM3+ USB 3.1 testing or something would be your best option some reviews do include those tests for example:
https://nl.hardware.info/reviews/6106/5/msi-990fxa-gaming-am...

Overall considerably lower performance and that's against older intel motherboards that do not have native USB 3.1 support either, mostly because of PCIE 3.0 support and substantially better PCIE latency over both the PCH PCIE bridge and the native CPU PCIE lanes.

Based on the numbers from this benchmark I can tell you that the USB 3.1 10gig performance on newer motherboards is considerably better than that, just by comparing my X99 (which is also tested in the aforementioned benchmark) to my high end Z170 motherboards with the same storage peripherals.
Overall I'm getting slightly better speeds on my X99 setup than they had (probably slightly faster storage) but the Z170 offers anywhere between 20 to 30% better performance depending on the benchmark with the same SSD based external storage.
This comment makes you sound like a very biased MS fan. Saying this is ok bwcause some mobile OS providers do similar things is absurd. This is an entirely separate class of device and should be treated as such. Apple absolutely collects nowhere near this much data on their desktop OS, so that is also misleading.
If continuing to use your current hosting provider is important to you, I suggest you ask them to integrate Let's Encrypt on their end. (That could include just letting you get Let's Encrypt certs through cPanel; it doesn't necessarily have to mean a lot of coding for them.) We've been talking to a number of providers of various shapes and sizes who are doing this or planning to do it. It's the best option for hosting environments where the customer doesn't have administrative access.
I hope so too. I've had to work next to a fussy baby in a office, and it is the pits. I've even taken a baby and did some walking to try to get the kid to nap. We were a child care program so I guess it did come with the territory sometimes, much like being called by a head teacher to go to a site and act as a substitute when it seemed liked the plague had arrived. I'm pretty sure none of that would fly in a normal office setting.
Sure, compare it to some flashy Bentley sedan and pet yourself on the back!

The truth is Tesla is still just a toy for the rich.

I cant wait to see how model 3 turns out and if Tesla indeed will be able to deliver reliable (key word) "lower" priced cars.
Do you feel like the firewall is more about control of information and censorship or protectionism on the Internet?
Does anybody dislikes git ?
For me, I'm tracking Firefox esr anyway, so I don't get hit with incompatibility that often.
Or maybe use a smaller stroller so you're not ramming everyone with it?
Right. The only thing that looks particularly different (compared with the typical HPC node intended for workhorse vectorized code) about KNL on paper is the memory system, and possibly integrated interconnect. Given the usual library support, I don't see why there should be significant re-writing to be done, any more than for other AVX transitions (unless you're developing BLAS etc.).
It's not trying to do string editing at all.

It's operating on JSON de-serialized to maps and lists. String editing isn't a valid operation on the data model they specify. You can replace a string value with another.

Section 3.3 outlines the allowed operations, which basically allows you to obtain an iterator, move it, insert, delete and retrieve keys and values.

You could certainly model string editing in it, by putting each character into it as a separate value, but then as you point out it'd probably not do very well because it doesn't contain heuristics to model intent of text editing, but to model changes to a JSON object hierarchy while avoiding loss of data.

You could use this algorithm combined with one intended for string-editing to improve on it for values where partial edits of the values matters, certainly.
I think that incentive idea is great, and is a smart move to build a community, particularly when you're trying to draw subject matter experts. I like how some of the Ask<X> reddits do it, by flagging people with verified advanced degrees. People think that news sites are afraid of conflicting opinions, but in my experience that's nonsense, it just has to be well thought out and not "DEATH TO <ISRAEL/ARABS/SUNNI/TURKS/AMERICA>", which is the vast majority.

It still doesn't solve the problem that for someone to _find_ those great comments, they have to _read_ them, and stop them from getting buried.

I'll err on the side of caution with revealing employee counts, but in my experience many of the FP/Atlantic/Mother Jones/Weekly Standard/Pick your midrange site are running on a single digit to low double-digit number of web production staff, many of whom are also trying to make a writing, article layout, or fact-checking quota. The suggestion that these magazines can either get those staffers to moderate tens of thousands of comments per day, or quadruple their web staff just to improve the comments ignores the business reality.

User moderation in the normal HN/Reddit way doesn't work well on news sites, it's too easy to game or brigade, and news sites can't or won't give add unpaid moderators to be gatekeepers.

That's what's hard; creating comments is scalable, filtering them is not. Leaving them unfiltered doesn't work either.
This is why counter-suits against police departments are worthwhile; once you have a counterclaim, likely for more money than they seized, they'll be willing to settle.

During this time of pending marijuana legalization in Canada, my company has seen great success with federal suits against police departments. If one takes a cue from the scientology lawyers (file motions to get their lawyers removed for prejudicing the police's case with their bias, etc), you can drag the lawsuit out for two to three years, at which point the police will be unable to convert/sell the seized property, and will be practically begging you to take the stuff back.
Well it doesn't work very well on my phone. By the time I zoom enough to be able to read the text, its usually going way past the right hand side.
A great resource.
does netplwiz not work on windows 10?
A good read also would be Let My People Go Surfing[0], which explains a little bit more of the philosophy of the company and decisions like this, as well as why they decided to try to run their business in a sustainable way. The founder of the company really didn't have a goal to dominate the market he was in, he just wanted to sell some items to fund what he really enjoyed doing.

It would be a good read for this crowd.

[0] http://www.patagonia.com/let-my-people-go-surfing.html
Are you referring to general trade barriers (in which I can agree help nascent industries and even the country in the long term) or the firewall that blocks many foreign sites?

On the latter point, I'd be surprised if it is ROI positive for the country. One would expect it would cut off significant communication with the outside world, resulting in duplicate work needing to be done (can't find that open source package on github as github is blocked? that sucks). The censorship regime additionally introduces self-policing costs to Chinese firms.