"They erected a firewall because of centuries of Western imperialism and foreign bullying."

The enormity of your tiermondist, ultra-leftist claim is mind boggling.

How could possibly a censorship tool change history?

"As foreigner you might be fine with "free-trade" that allows you to freely sell opium"

Equating contemporary free trade with selling opium is truly mind boggling.

"or take over cities on sovererign land"

Are you high by any chance?

" or to have foreign social networking companies plaster agenda driven poitical propoganda to people in your country (I'm talking about the facebook India snafu)"

Someone who can't spell gives lessons in political "propoganda", right.

"but they do have to think about national interest, and not foreign interest."

Wait, I thought this gigantic censorship tool was about rewriting history, not about some fuzzy "national interest". You keep changing the rationale.

"It's also not exactly a fair playground if foreign multinationals with decades of established dominance, experience, R&D, and human capital from the developed world compete against Chinese companies which most would be upstarts or recent companies, and with human capital from less developed sources."

Only an ultraleftist would translate international trade in such terms. Congratulations, you won the "tiermondist of the year" award!

"When none of the country has drinkable tap water, their people have a lot of things on their plate."

Wait, didn't this ecological disaster happen under Mao, when China was ABSOLUTELY cut off from the world? Wouldn't your drinkable water argument structurally undermine your ever-shifting rationale of China being cut off from the world?

"They don't need foreign competition."

So it's not about rewriting history, national interest, or drinking water. It's all about being anti-competitive. The neverending goal of ultraleftists.

"It'd be like sending a fully armed US marine squad to duke it out with squad of high schoolers and blaming China for being unfair for erecting a wall around the high schoolers while they grow and train."

So you're against China's foreign investment in REALLY underdeveloped Africa, right?

"Protectionism is a valid strategy to help boost domestic economic development"

This idea was debunked 50 years ago; only ultraleftists keep singing the silly song of economic protectionism as development tool.

" it's fairly arrogant and imperialistic to assert that we as fully developed foreigners"

Wait, you mean China should allow foreign investment if it comes from less-developed sources? Be clear :-)

"we as fully developed foreigners have any right to exploit markets in less developed areas."

So in your ultraleftist view international trade and foreign investment are nothing but "exploiting markets". Mind boggling.

Comrade, I understand your brain is fixated on ultraleft politics. However, just because you have such bizarre thoughts doesn't mean you're supposed to spew your bizarre ideas into the unsuspecting public.

Let's put it this way: when someone has common flu he/she is still allowed to use public streets, but this doesn't mean they are allowed (or expected) to voluntarily sneeze into people's faces.