skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
http://jsfiddle.net/ancpedz4/1/

Click the word clicker, you will see what happens.
That sounds like a maps problem, not caused by IP databases.
Why would that leak key material? Knowing that you matched a few characters of the hash (based on earlier exit and quicker response time) doesn't tell you that some of the password characters match -- a partially-matching password shouldn't have an relationship to a fully-matching one, right?
The Baby Boomer era is past. What you describe of your father's experience no longer really exists. If that's the only person you know, then your impressions of the career possibilities of a PhD are seriously out of date.

In your father's era, many blue collar workers could also "start a family, purchase property, and start building personal wealth" with their jobs, including straight out of high school.

For that matter, the programmers of the 1960s and 1970s also had little problem getting a solid job.

Nowadays with a PhD in chemistry you often end up doing a postdoc or two for several years. As two data points, https://sankirnam.wordpress.com/category/chemistry-jobs-2/ :

> I didn’t do a postdoc because I wanted to get an industry job, but now it appears that a postdoc is necessary – and this is information that I only found out after graduating.

That in turn points to http://justlikecooking.blogspot.com/2016/05/postdoc-required... , which points out job ads for industry which require post-doc experience.

An organic chemist now likely will be in the early 30s before being able to do the things your father did immediately after graduating. And without having to deal with issues like http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj... or http://www.nature.com/naturejobs/science/articles/10.1038/nj... . Yes, postdocs often have roommates: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=postdoc+roommate&t=ffsb&ia=web .

You end with "Is this not somewhat like college". Absolutely, I agree. My point is that what you describe is much more like the college experience than it is the PhD experience.

Or like a journeyman, who also, at least traditionally, does not 'put down roots'.
Here is another person who belongs to something else category - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMA0Cv5Q2Mo

Eskil Ronningsbakken - http://www.eskilbalance.com/
Someone close by should go there and stick a sign in the ground reading "This is not the location you're looking for".
Interestingly "gioza" and "gyoza" as factors come out with opposite signs. I guess that provides a heuristic confidence interval for the weights.
Very interesting littlw study. The results seem to make sense, and I'm impressed that his model can learn what causes his weight swings given the low resolution delta-weight data he collects.

The author uses vowpal-wabbit to train his regression model. Anybody know what learning algorithm it uses (eg random forest?) Here's the link: https://github.com/JohnLangford/vowpal_wabbit/wiki
"Some of the most interesting and deadly aspects of the enemies were bugs caused by improperly terminated boundary conditions in the algorithms. Often these bugs produced behavior far more interesting and psychotic then anything I conceived of."
-Eugene Jarvis on Robotron 2084
That firewood isn't far off the mark. There really is a market for premium firewood. I remember seeing two types on sale at a local gas station: Normal firewood bundled with a few turns of plastic wrap, and "guaranteed spider free" firewood sealed inside bags for double the price.

Fyi, don't trust bought firewood. Most of it isn't properly dry and can clog up stoves. Buy and stack it yourself for a season.
I visited last year. There's still large quantities of standing dead trees, and it seems like the other vegetation never quite recovered.

The danger signs were quite spooky.
All cars should come with the equivalent of an "airplane mode" switch--easily accessible to the owner--that disables all RF emissions and receptions. Since car companies are certainly not going to provide the switch voluntarily, it's probably going to require regulations to make it happen.
I mean it was just a small bug, the date selector widget should have been showing departure date only.
Mailvelope Key Server
But let's say you get the pay incentive after you go through a class on deescalation. Make it a 4hr online class :)

Now, the debate can center on training again. But, this time with a focus on deescalation vs how to aim for center of body mass.

Anyway, it's probably a bad idea: I haven't thought about it much. But, I do think we need to start thinking about carrots instead of just sticks.
Watch out for Survivor Bias. Ask how people aimed to FI and failed, too.
Seems to be a slightly modified Stochastic Gradient Descent to handle the data typically seen with this sort of analysis. https://github.com/JohnLangford/vowpal_wabbit/wiki/Learning-...
I don't have a long history of steady exercise, but I think I am making progress. Two of the obstacles were:

(1) Tedium. For my heart, I thought I had to run. For the other muscles, I thought I really should be doing 30 different exercises, split across three days, every week. Otherwise my body would become imbalanced from training some muscles and missing others. Some people enjoy this sort of thing. But for me it is mindnumbingly boring, and on top of that, physically uncomfortable. Boredom is one thing, and pain is one thing, but this kind of thing is boring and painful at the same time.

(2) Threshold. Once in a blue moon, I would feel motivated to exercise that much, but most days of the week, I didn't. Those days, I might have been willing to go for a short walk or do one or two exercises. But I thought, such a small amount of exercise isn't much better than nothing at all. Plus I'll have to shower. If instead I spend the next 30 minutes working, running some errand, or even just unwinding, that will make a difference. Therefore I will do one of those things instead of lightly exercising.

So the two things that are maybe helping me overcome those obstacles are:

(1) Exercise programs like the StrongLifts 5x5 (which is not 25 different exercises). It is "the Squat, Bench Press, Deadlift, Overhead Press and Barbell Row. You do three of these exercises each workout, three times a week, for about 45 minutes per workout. You Squat every workout, three times a week" (http://stronglifts.com/5x5/). I haven't dived fully into the program, but the prospect of a few "compound exercises" is enticing, especially if they each develop several muscles at a time, so that with just these I will work out my whole body. This is a time-tested program, recommended by many people, and invented by the guy who trained Arnold Swarzenegger.

(2) Finding out that walking is good enough. Even the gym rats say that the best way to lose weight is walking, especially before breakfast. Okay, I sort of enjoy walking (sometimes). So if I feel like walking, I will! I have, and it is sort of addicting. Unlike running, which makes me never want to do it again (the same goes for all other intense activities that certain people consider fun, like swimming, HIT, surfing, rock-climbing, soccer, football, and so on.)
I agree with you. I think POs without technical ability have problems communicating with developers and understanding what's possible/feasible etc.
Maybe there's a correlation between weight gain and spelling ability? /s
I would guess that the natural diamonds' prices have fallen as the synthetics increasingly set a price floor. They have such large stockpiles of diamonds and they have to bring in revenue, they can't simply pretend the synthetics don't exist on the market and price accordingly. Or to put it another way: for such perfect substitutes and commodities, the prices should be near-identical, and so it is wrong to try to imply that consumers haven't saved a ton of money because the prices are similar; you need a time-series of prices.
Strangely enough, I live in the Willow Creek neighborhood you selected. For me, living on the opposite side, it would be just over a two mile walk. And for the most part, it's a very pleasant walk through a park-like development of mature trees, creeks, playgrounds, a school, etc. The last section is not too bad either with cross-walks, lights, etc. And the Google map is a bit out of date. There's a new condo development just a block or so away from the station. But for me, it's a moot-point as my commute is in the opposite direction...
Yes, I use saffron to cook paella, a spanish dish. Saffron is quite valuable, so it should make a good cash crop!
Hacker Reveals Personal Information for Almost 200 Democrats
If I ever get a time machine, I know what I'm taking back to fund my travels...
USDCHF: Weakens with Caution
How did people fight off lions before there was sugar and pasta?
Safety devices would negate the exceptional risk he's undertaking, and make it not so remarkable. That's why "walking a tightrope without a net" is remarkable. As to the sinking ferries situation, yeah those should be safer, but no one on a ferry is proud of risking their life on their daily commute.
Some more analysis:

https://twitter.com/pwnallthethings/status/76422342907567309...
Sign me up for the expedition.
I'm neither a lawyer nor an accountant. But I can smell that something is off. I don't wish to appear discriminatory, so I won't ask which country your foreign investors are from. But you need to do your research into them and similar investors. Just saying.

If your counsel can't tell you, then they are not very well informed. Haven't you read about the Panama Papers? That is just one of many tax havens. But it is more than just tax management. Using off-shore companies is used for all sorts of "frowned upon" activities.

You need to be aware that the IRS requires significant amounts of documentation etc - which could affect you as founders and shareholders. Other government agencies are also very interested in such off-shore arrangements.

As good as HN is for feedback. You really need competent attorneys and accountants to advise you.
Dibs!

(I'm sorry, I couldn't help it.)
In that case, let's save some bandwidth and just synthesize the facial expressions. Mostly, it would be work/concentration, with occasional glances of affection towards the "viewer." Of course, we'd probably get this slightly wrong, fall into the uncanny valley, and everyone would be left with the subconscious impression that everyone else hates them, and furthermore is actually an alien doppelganger posing as a an actual human. (Or that everyone else is a grievously defective human who needs to be shunned/euthanized for the good of the species.)
How to Quit Your Multitasking Addiction
Two Ways You’re Probably Sabotaging Your Goals Without Realizing It
So, is Heaven real?
These are some of my best friends and fellow veterans. We couldn't be prouder of what they are doing. They are part of YC's fellowship as well if that wasn't already known.

What you all here might be interested in that isn't discussed is how they are opening up and transforming logistics and supply chain into previously closed markets. That is the huge opportunity here that few have the skills or background to properly navigate. These are still hard to win supply lines, but there are openings there.

Congrats Kim and Emily!
Relevant info: the lawsuit of craigslist vs padmapper and 3taps: "3taps claimed that Craigslist was a public website, so anyone, including 3Taps always had authorization. The court disagreed with this..." (Wikipedia)
I lost my motivation to exercise a few years ago. My body type is "skinny/decent" without exercise and I can generally eat whatever I want with little consequences. That said, I don't really eat a lot. I only eat when I'm hungry. I would say I'm of average fitness currently.

I used to be in amazing shape, 6pack, big muscles, big chest, perfect legs, etc. My goal was motivated to get the most attention I possibly could and to show my body off. I achieved it, and got a lot of attention. My life revolved around going to the gym every day, having a personal trainer, drinking tons of protein shakes, eating "healthy", and reading muscle/workout blogs. At night I would go out to the club and dance, usually with my shirt off, and on the weekends I went to circuit parties.

I hung out with only pretty people, and used my body at work to get what I wanted. I had plenty of one night stands, and enjoyed flirting with people and making others jealous. I reveled in my own beauty and self-confidence.

At some point, it all just got really boring. I realized that the attention I was getting was because of my body, and not because of "me". Sex became a routine, there was no longer a thrill of trying to land someone hot when you've already had hot so many times. I felt like a machine. In the end, I was no longer willing to sacrifice hours of my life each day in a gym for my own vanity and for that of others. I realized the club/circuit scene is actually for losers (albeit pretty ones). And most important I realized that getting in shape and looking pretty isn't that hard if you just go to the gym, and it certainly doesn't make you unique.

I would like to come back to a healthy balance, because I did enjoy working out. I just fear if I go back to it, it will take over my life again and ruin the introverted time I now spend reading, on my side projects, etc.
This macs are unsupported by latest macOs
I don't think it's a spoiler to say that this is a major plot point in "The Three Body Problem" by Liu Cixin.
Losing weight means that your muscles (and also your bones) need to carry less weight, so while technically you're not getting more fit, the fitness you have becomes more effective. So losing excess fat is definitely one of the most important steps towards becoming fit.

If anything, I would question how healthy ketosis is, long term... But I'm pretty sure it's way healthier than any processed-food diet typical in the west...
The entire content of renormalization is summarized as this, given a calculation, you make it match the interaction at some energy. Assuming that the fix is essentially choosing the "scale" of quantities (say, voltage of the electric field, or how strongly electrons tug on other electrons) you are calculating, you fix that scale by making sure that after including it in your theory now, that your result matches the measured interaction at your chosen energy scale exactly. That is renormalization.

If you do this, you find that you need to choose a scale that "absorbs" the infinities of your calculations (yes, an "infinite" scale). But, the stuff that is not absorbed is a function of energy, and this actually agrees very well with experiment beyond the scale you normalized to.
I didn't choose the term "unlock" randomly... I know that they can unlock most locks without leaving any evidence behind (maybe even all locks)... which is why I asked this question.
I Drove a Crazy Rare Imported TVR Tuscan, and It's Insane
Not all of them, for instance, he on-sight free soloed Fiesta de los Biceps (5.11d) [1]

[1]: http://www.dpmclimbing.com/articles/view/alex-honnold-onsigh...
Not that hard to estimate. Lucara mines ~90k carats per quarter (http://www.lucaradiamond.com/i/pdf/CP-Q12016.pdf), or 360k carats per year. They recovered the OP stone in question after 5 months, and it was not that unprecedented as a sale by them of the Constellation 813-carat stone is also mentioned. So 1 every 6 months or 2 per year is entirely possible at this point. But we'll go with 1 1k stone per year, or 1 per every 360k carats mined. Global diamond output is somewhere on the order of 137 million carats per year (http://www.mining.com/web/despite-de-beers-and-rios-efforts-...). If all mining has a similar rate but they are crushing the big ones, then that suggests that 137000 / 360 = 380 stones are being destroyed each year currently.

Production has risen steeply over history (http://www.gia.edu/cs/Satellite?blobcol=gfile&blobheader=app...) but "The total global production from antiquity to 2005 is estimated to be 4.5 billion carats". So for an all-time estimate, 11*360 + 4500000 / 360 = 16460.

This seems improbably high: surely at least some of those 16k giant stones would've survived? So maybe Lucera's current mine got lucky, or it's unique in providing lots of giant stones. ("It has an enviable share of the world’s heavyweight diamonds. Of the 52 biggest diamonds discovered in the past three centuries, 10 have come from Lucara in the past three years. With modifications under way at the mill, Lucara will soon be able to recover diamonds up to 3,000 carats, and next year, up to 5,000 carats—as big as a softball.") Still, I would personally stay the hell away from giant diamonds as any kind of investment or prestige trophy.
So disallow the direct operator but allow equality to be deduced indirectly by usage of > < >= <= ?
My problem with this method is that my body does not burn the food in the same way. And, it doesn't burn every food in a way similar to every other food.

I get that it's the best scientists could think of 100+ years ago. But putting averaged numbers derived from this absurd method on labels as if they are how my (!!) body works, and deriving all kinds of "food science" conclusions and recommendations from it is imo willful ignorance in the name of convenience.
I've watched many free soloists that make me nervous, but I don't get nervous watching Honnold. He is so amazingly solid, so methodical, so smooth.
I really like your reading because I went to a time period when everything I read was so misleading even words from doctors. That's the time when I tried very hard to improve my health (I gained about 30 lbs since the time I came to this country 15 years ago). To do that, I ate less fat, avoid carbs, getting a lot of exercises (1-3hrs a day, at least 5 days a week), eating oatmeal, even taking statins. And all one failed after another. I went through a lot of things mentioned here. And finally I decided to forget about everything doctors and researchers said. I look at my parents diet and how I was raised and started slowly from there. My health then got improved much better. I'm glad that you wrote something here for everybody to read. But there's one point I would like to add to the recipe:
improve mental state by listening to the body (meditation, yoga, brisk walking are good methods), eat only when the body feels hungry and stop eating when it feels full, eat the food that it feels good after eating (you will develop your own list).
I lost about 10lbs and I don't gain/lose any weight for the last 3 years.
In our culture, maybe.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lobolo
It's astonishing (and really awesome) that they were able to extract such a strong signal from daily weight swings! This makes me a lot more optimistic about the possibilities of quantified-self-type stuff.

Three things I'm really curious about:

- How significant are the estimates of lifestyle factors? Do you have p-values? If you bootstrap resample, how much do the rankings change at the extremes?

- How much cognitive overhead did it impose to collect the data for this? Did you put a lot of effort into designing the tags beforehand or making sure you weighed yourself at a consistent time?

- It looks like the predicted delta from going from a "nosleep" day to a "sleep" days is about 1.4 pounds (sleep coef minus nosleep coef). That seems fishy, or at least like it will stop working fairly soon because you can't actually lose 1.4 pounds/day sustainably. Is it possible there's something weird going on with the data or those variables don't have the obvious meanings?
How do I install that to Tampermonkey? Is it available on https://greasyfork.org/?
The Good e-Reader runs arbitrary Android apps and has a 13" display, if that meets your needs.

https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/13-3-inch-android-e-reade...
I thought your comment was implying this statistic wasn't really a big deal when you average it over the whole population. I was trying to argue that a simple average is misleading, and it is a big deal.

If "in expectation" is a well-defined statistical term or something and I misunderstood, my bad.
really thought provoking material here
From what I remember of the course, it was itself mostly "porting" code (well, formulas) from the textbook to Octave/Matlab.
How Does the Shift to GitHub Impact Project Collaboration?
Thanks that was pretty interesting! Seems like a good way to do lots of things (don't think about it too much just start and figure it out as you go).
Here's a video that touches on Honnold's prep for his ascent of El Sendoro Luminoso. Given that it's likely the most difficult ropeless climb in history (and on limestone, which is far more prone to breaking holds than Yosemite granite), he wasn't exactly super meticulous:

https://youtu.be/Phl82D57P58

At lower grades he has been known to just go for it.
Thank you. I have the old one and am not experiencing stuck modifiers so I'll hold off.
From my data, it's mostly 25 to 35. So they leave after graduating college and presumably come back after 35 to settle. That might change though as it's only been a decade that people have been doing this (and only a few years on massive scale).
Generate Weekly Reports from Your Git Commits
C is still useful to know, its not nice and clean and modern like Rust but C11 has some new useful modern parts. When I was a kid you had to be in the know to know about open source, I didn't have the benefit of seeing lots of other people's code and looking at projects back then, wish I did this ia a great environment for learning with all the free online resources compared to the late 80s BBS era.
Complete and total lack of motivation here.

The main problem for me is that my only motivation for working out would be to gain muscle for the purpose of looking more attractive to the opposite sex. I'm married and my wife is happy and during a two-year stint in my 20s when I actually took it seriously (personal trainer and everything), I ended up getting almost no visible results (gained strength but I need only enough to tap keys). For whatever reason, I struggle to gain weight the same way people struggle to lose it (though, admittedly, it's a lot easier to have my problem). I've been underweight since High School with the warning given to me by my friends/family that "it'll catch up with me when I'm 'x'" (where "x" is an age I've passed already, and y, and z). I get yearly physicals and have my cholesterol levels (and others) checked. They're all where they should be (or better). I've had a lot of other things checked, too -- always happens when I get a new doctor and he starts inquiring about my diet -- which, we'll just say, includes a 40-oz chocolate milk shake[0] most nights and goes downhill from there.

Having "bigger muscles", which wouldn't serve much of a purpose for me, isn't nearly enough motivation and I don't particularly enjoy working out. And having no other reason means I have zero motivation.

[0] I know the precise size of the milkshake because that's the size of the cup. I joke that I own one of those health-nut blenders with the pretty "running girl" on the front drinking a likely-tasteless smoothy. I bought it because I hated cleaning the big blender every night and fill it with things that would warrant a different looking person on the box.

Edit: 64 oz didn't seem right so I looked at the container, it was 40 oz.
This matches my experience of weight loss using high fat diet. I started it after hearing Sarah Hallberg's Tedx talk. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=da1vvigy5tQ&feature=youtu.be
For a vegetarian, starting and continuing the high fat low carb diet is difficult. Are there any resources for more vegetarian recipes for high fat low carb food?

The article was very impressive. I liked the graphs and presentation.
These are direct solutions to the exercises. I took the class some time ago and also did it in python.
They got carbs from fruits, starchy root vegetables and whole grains. Ketosis isn't some magic thing that all our ancestors did all the time.
Do these pages make money by reposting content from other people and sites or do they just like getting likes?