skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Wrong that's all you need. In fact according to Peter Lynch you have a better chance of alpha as you dont have to deal with all the bs a PM at a big fund has too.
From what I've seen, many of these locations can be accessed without ever actually entering the property. The name, description, and photos are user-generated, and no more illegal than what Google Maps provides. Some locations are unique (airports come to mind), but most of the IP risk seems completely frivolous to me.
Extending the list,

9) New technology can be very expensive. For example, a colleague's father purchased a DVD player in 1998 that cost $3,000 in today's dollar.

10) New technology often has bugs. After Microsoft releases updates, I always wait a few days to see if there are any reports of problems before updating Windows (I run Windows 7 so I can still do that).
A sufficient difference in quantity becomes a difference in quality. Some of these concerns are merely amusing now, but could conceivably become real problems at scale.

I'm hedging, because I think this is likely to be a fluke event and be a non-issue for a long time. Even if AR games become big, this is probably the first and last time we're all playing the exact same one. Plus over time this sort of thin connectivity to the real world may be seen as a fluke; AR may require much stronger computer vision and real-world understanding to take off in a non-fluke way.

Pokemon Go reminds me a lot of the GPS unit my father had 20 years ago, where all it knew about was cities. I'm not even sure why he bought it, the most interesting thing you could do is zoom out in the Chicago area and roughly see Lake Michigan. Prior to GPS units being hooked up to road databases and able to give directions, they were not that useful. Similarly, for all the flash and pizzaz Pokemon Go may superficially seem to have, all it really has is your coordinates.

This doesn't make it "bad" but it's not clear to me this is going to be a new genre. It may just be one cool fad game, with the "real" stuff still to come in what could even be another 10 years.
It's so amazing, it was probably made with secret alien technology!
Depending on the state, a lot of employer-side expenses are capped above a certain salary, most developers are well above that cap... so 25% less for you, doesn't mean 25% less for the employer.
Why Apple went into music with the iPod? Well... The rest is history.
I graduated in the mid-90s. I remember using lisp and ML in multiple classes. We also used Prolog although that's not a FP language but it is certainly non-traditional.
Pee bootloader runs on the gpu, so that doesnt matter much. Current bootloader can bootstrap ARM in 64bit mode, as is evidenced by freebsd port and https://www.raspberrypi.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=72&t=1379... (all but the gpu works)
Dan Abramov on NPM dependencies
I remember this passage!!! But I remember it in Italian (that's my mother tongue). So weird to be able to recognize it in English.
Disagree. I've found over the years that I pick up new programming languages rapidly. I attribute this to already having a broad base of experience in different paradigms and techniques such that at this point everything is just a variation on something I've worked with before.
This++ ... I know it's hard, but would love for anything beyond a 15-minute stand up be limited to one day a week for developers.
You can complain, but for most of us, emacs means either:

A) A family of editors

B) Editor MACroS, a collection of TECO extensions written by various members of the MIT AI lab, and maintained by RMS.

C) GNU Emacs, a powerful text editor that was based on EMACS that is written in a combination of C and its own dialect of Lisp.

In this case, it's obvious that they mean B or C, or both. RMS isn't quite crazy enough to seriously claim he wrote every Emacs. Yet. ;)

In short, it's obvious what they meant, stop being such a pedant.
"Struggling to find a quality provider who allows emailing prospects"

Do you perhaps mean spam?
Would an alien race discover things at the same ORDER we did?

For most things, I do think the answer is a huge yes. Electronics before photonics is a serious candidate for universal order. We got biochemical computers first, but we don't get an easy way to improve them, again looks probably that this is universal.

About binary, yes, that's a theoretical best. If we stop using it some day, it will be only because our physical computers somehow suck at encoding them, or shine a lot on another specific basis.

Registers and memory, I have no idea.
The New Research from Northeastern University
The question didn't even mention safety; maybe FP people are tying their own hands by insisting on safety features that users don't value. And if you're comparing N-way parallel FP code against serial C, maybe 500% overhead still leaves room for FP to win.
Google has a fair amount of clojure, or at least they did at one point of time, although it was inherited from an acquisition.
And how am I supposed to learn all of that? ;).

Maybe there's a reason Smalltalk never caught on...
I suspect, from my own anecdata, it's because a great many of us in the field have had gut issues. A lot of us lead lifestyles that aren't necessarily the greatest (although I feel overall that old adage is changing for the better rapidly) and have a deep interest in fixing the problem. Plus, knowing how things work, biological, electrical, whatever.. it all fits the hacker ethos
Obviously can't speak to everywhere, but the statutes around here (right to work) specifically allow for an initial probationary period.

Within the first few months of employment (or less/longer, as set out in a contract), the employee can be easily fired. They want similar reasons to a normal firing (underperforming, inappropriate behaviour, etc) but the information I can find says that the bar is set much lower and they're more just worried about you "acting in good faith".

I've rarely (if ever) seen it used. Usually people want to take the time to try and develop the employee, but they end up shooting themselves in the foot. If you hire someone that's not working out you can let them go pretty quickly. Once their probation is up you're stuck with them. So fire fast, don't dick around.
30 seconds on google:
http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/692601/NATO-military-chi...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-15/nato-says-it-might-...

And look who gets blamed for the DNC leak:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-07-25/fbi-launches-probe-...
> Let’s take the example of a restaurant that advertises itself as a “Poké Stop” and utilizes a game image in connection with the stylized “Poké Stop” mark in its store window. That is arguably an instance of both copyright and trademark infringement.

It seems crazy to me that a developer can put a pokestop(or w/e) inside of a store with no notification or permission from the property owner, but the property owner can't put up a sign indicating that a pokestop has been created inside of their store without getting a license. If that's really how the law works we've already reached the dystopian future.
>Expansion of the military.

Trump is for a reduction in military spending. Reduce spending by buying only the best weapons and equipment while
shutting down useless projects. Also, he will stop letting lobbyists force the military to buy useless expensive equipment that they don't need. Under Trump, the military will finally be free to buy only the equipment it need.

>Favoring eminent domain.

He's not going to pass any new laws. Hillary is not going to pass any new laws concerning this either.

>Iranian

Iran should not have access to nuclear weapons. Your liberties will be meaningless if your country is destroyed by nukes that ISIS stole from Iran.

>Federal trade

Trump will renegotiate trade deals and make the country rich and wealthy again. Why would any libertarians want a poor broken country? Your liberties are meaningless if you're dying on the street of hunger.

>Border walls

Barbarians are ransacking your cities. Trump just wants to stop it.

>Gay marriage left to the states

As it should. In this way, you will have the liberty and freedom to move to a state that agrees with your view. It should NOT be one single national rule that everyone MUST conform to. People should have the freedom of choice to follow it or not. And the only way you can have that is to have some states legalize it, while some don't.

>I don't know what brand of libertarianism you are familiar with.

The kind that says the government should provide a safe place for people to live lives the way they want while NOT meddling in their personal affairs, like which bathroom they can and can not use. People have always been able to use the bathroom responsibly. You don't suddenly need the government to help you use the bathroom now.
> I mean each day 100's of Phd's...

Yes, but then... "Finance novice beats hedge fund pros, winning $100k in Quantopian trading contest"

https://pando.com/2015/03/05/finance-novice-beats-hedge-fund...

Thousands of brilliant people are out there undiscovered and I think quantopian does a great job leveling the playing field.
Time Management at Khan Academy
Generative linguistics is pretty isolated these days... chugging along but using a set of methodologies and premises that are pretty far removed from the rest of academia. Generative linguistics generally had trouble in two key areas 1) first language acquisition (where increasingly ornate innate machinery is needed to explain how kids arrive at the 'right' grammar) and 2) language processing, where the structural representations were never great at predicting processing difficulty, nor implementable in a machine. Consequently, these two fields have long been in psychology (and the reason I'm a psych graduate student, of all things!), and draw heavily on statistics cognitive science, NLP and in the latter case, information theory.

Chomsky is brilliant, no doubt, and critically showed the world how much latent structure there is in language. However, he is IMHO pretty wrong in thinking that this latent structure can't be learned (e.g. inferring a probabilistic context-free grammar).

One thing to be said for generative linguistics is that a whole lot of super-interesting phenomena have only been characterized within specific generative frameworks--language documentation and psycholinguistic research can only progress with a formal system in which language can be rigorously characterized. So one of the huge projects in the future will be translating the 50+ years of research into the formalisms in the modern computer science / statistical NLP / Bayesian cognitive science / learning-centric developmental psychology stack.
Until you can run an IPv6 service without dual-stack, it's not in the present in the same way you're talking about. We are still very much in the transition period. Yes, it's positive to see IPv6 growth, but the fact remains that any new service today must provide both IPv4 and IPv6 end-points and that is likely to continue for years.
Plugless Power: the world's first wireless EV charging system
> The actionable data for traditional food (even that which is selectively bred) is that the majority of the population is fine with it.

That seems like a pretty fallacious argument, unless your end goal for food is merely that "the population is fine with it." Human history is full of death and disease due to malnutrition. It's not exactly a solved problem, and "the way it's always been" is almost certainly not the best we can achieve.
These 10 cities have the most Pokemon Go-obsessed people
And that state is a completely made up mathematical artifact.

The wavefunction is not measurable, but its absolute value squared is. This does not mean it's not "real". I understand what you mean, but you need to provide us with another better answer that supports all observations before saying it's "completely made up".

And yes, the Schrödinger equation predicts exactly how a state evolves, even after a measurement. It does not tell you what the outcome of a measurement is - you give it the outcome, and it gives you the time evolution.

There is a problem, and it lies in what happens during measurement - or what is the exact nature of measurement. But given any state, the SE tells you how it evolves.
> I think it's clear from your first comment which of us feels superior. Smugness seems to pass as argument in this debate.

Not sure what you're referring to here but I did not use the word superior or make any references to superiority in any of my replies, but I think it's ironic that you accuse me of using smugness as an argument when you only responded to the first sentence of my reply (to tell me I'm smug) instead of the paragraph describing the argument.

> I was clearly distinguishing between those who hold that position because they think there are no significant differences and those who would maintain that position if uncomfortable differences were discovered.

What I'm telling you is that "those who hold that position because they think there are no significant differences" is a strawman. Once again, everyone except self-identified racists (they do exist) claim that all people should be treated equally and it is fallacious for you to claim a monopoly on this position because you believe it to be an inevitable truth that some races are genetically predisposed to stupidity.
Read on: said entity also has to have demonstrable evidence of business ties to APEC countries.

https://www.border.gov.au/Busi/Trav/APEC
I enjoyed this quote:

"Business models can’t change," he says. Once a business learns how to make money one way, it’s almost impossible to shift gears. Still, there is one slender reed of hope: "While businesses can't change, corporations can."
Because monocultures have been around for over a century, opposing them is irrational? That doesn't make sense. If your goal is to increase biodiversity, it would (at least on the surface of it) seem entirely rational to boycott GMO products. Would you care to elaborate why this is not the case?
Champions League: Έξι χρόνια μετά για ΠΑΟΚ
Dota 2 isn't going anywhere. The current tournament has an $18+ million prize pool (and rising) - meaning Valve was paid about $72 million in compendium sales.

This is for a tournament that runs every year and is growing in popularity and size.
A prion can change the shape of other proteins, but can't make proteins.
Edit: This turned out to be a mini memoir, please skip if irrelevant to you

This is veering off-topic so apologies. I tried to match my experience with the feelings described by the author in the article, but yes, you're right, depression can be much more than that. Now I say can because I visualise depression as a spiral, not necessarily consistent throughout, but definitely like a bottomless well. The feeling of being a "pressure cooker" is a level of depression, but I'm tempted to say that it's not the worst. The worst, and the most dangerous, I felt was self-transparency, where I lost all sense of what makes "me" and the world feels like a ghost and passes straight through. It was much more than numbness, it was emptiness that felt more white than black, yet I remember tears that won't stop welling, of shaking and shivering and lots of switching offs, usually to actual sleep. This was different to melancholy though, this was really the point when you don't consider but believe that you're absolutely and weightlessly nothing - and consequently there is no difference in physical life and death. There's no more anger nor confusion, just whispers of what's the point. I know that all this sounds poetic (and I haven't covered all that precedes this point such as guilt/imposter/self-ripping) but damn it wasn't beautiful. Suicide might be an idea my mind fiercely puts a gate around, but the desire for death creeps in anyway: there were a few incidents when my foot slowed down when crossing the road, when I walked alone at midnight ... no it wasn't nice.

I'm glad no harm came to me. It turned out that the worst was actually the beginning of my recovery; I managed to hold on for a little longer (thank you to my few friends and family) and gradually the world trickled in. I became fascinated by the sky though it hurt my eyes, but it had so many colours with clouds of different shapes, and a depth that showed that there is much much more beyond. Then the sounds came in. And looking at small children, I realised that I had become one too because we spoke the same language. It was very strange, but that was when I first felt happy! And proud and glad that I had hold on after all.

Falling into the spiral is like your world collapsing into a pile of cards. But let it collapse, and be patient: you will have the chance to rebuild, except with a cleaner slate and more thought for the now and the future. Just need to hold on for a little longer, and sleep, lots of sleep.
This is a very valid point. But what stops both parties to agree on 40h weeks during onboarding phase and then shift to the reduced work time?
Anyone have a link to a non-gated version of the original?
Do you have any other use cases? That is a pretty specific one that I don't think most people are likely to run into.
For a balance to the optimsim of this piece (it's not clear whether or not Juma's book is similarly technotopian, and his publishing history[1] suggests some temperence) is Michael and Joyce Heusemann's Techo-Fix, which looks at some of the negative implications of technology, central of which is the law of unintended consequences -- it's simply impossible for all the implications of a technology to be known in advance.

Comments here mention many of the false-starts in technology -- concepts which were overhyped, or which proved disasterous. Powerful new substances have long been used in medicine: herbs, minerals and elements (notably mercury), coal, coal tar, and petroleum, electricity, magnetism, and radiation. Some successfully. Many not.

There are ideas long hyped which have failed to materialise, particularly individual air transports, jet packs, and flying cars. But also more vialble concepts such as personal submersibles. Yes, they exist. No, they're not commonplace.

And there are entire societies and cultures which have emerged based on the principle of being late adopters of the technology curve, probably most notably to Americans, the Amish.

I disagree with Juma's assertion that technology progresses at an accelerating rate. There are technologies (fire, the wheel, automobiles, airplanes, railroads (and in particular railroad brakes)) which show a distinct development curve: slow emergence, accelerating takeoff, inflection point, stable (perhaps slowly improving) higher bound. Trains today use a brake developed in the 1880s. Automobile and aircraft patent issues reached a peak in the 1920s, and in the case of automobiles, actually fell afterward. Information technology is among the odd men out, though for reasons an ontology of technological mechanisms might help illustrate[2], but even it shows pronounced limits.

Google have recently announced an application of their AI technology in managing power within datacenters.[3] The multi-millionfold increase in computing power from 1970 to today has resulted in ... the ability to shave 15% off electrical consumption. Given a Moore's Law[4] doubling of compute capabilities and efficiencies every 18-24 months, that's roughly 3 months of increased chip effiency gains, and a one-time benefit. The Jevons Paradox also suggests it won't result in actual reductions in energy use, but an increase.

________________________________

Notes:

1. https://www.worldcat.org/search?q=au%3AJuma%2C+Calestou&qt=r...

2. See: https://ello.co/dredmorbius/post/klsjjjzzl9plqxz-ms8nww Paired with information technology, I'd include cities, transport and communications networks, and trade networks.

3. http://www.csmonitor.com/Technology/2016/0721/Google-goes-gr...

4. Or Wright's Law, see J. Doyne Farmer.
It doesn't make the Politicians Fallacy anymore valid.
> So I don't know what is missing from supplying the "builders" market.

It's an extremely small selection, compared to what it was in the early 90's (that I remember - and I remember older folks complaining about how far it had gone down hill even then).

There just is no store I can wander around these days (or series of stores) where I can visualize exactly what I need to build some project. For example I needed recently to put some electronics in a waterproof outdoor box, and cable it up nice with proper waterproof conduit.

For someone who has done that sort of thing 500 times for work, you know exactly what to order and what everything is called and how it will fit. For someone who never has I really miss just being able to go to a hobby/electronics store and actually see the components I'd need to put something together - usually modifying my plans in the process as I see what is available I never knew existed before.

This makes "making things" really hard for the beginner and removes a ton of spontaneous "lets just figure it out and get it done" type of projects - at least for me. There is no store to run back to to swap out that $1.50 component I bought the wrong part number of. Minutes/hours of latency to days at best.
I feel like people who make claims like the above are a bit divorced from reality. What would have usurped it as the reigning theory of syntax? OT Syntax? Maybe some sort of extension of DM (itself a spawn of generative ideas)...? Functionalist approaches are still a thing, but I don't think they're any more in vogue than they were 20 years ago.

NLP/Comp Ling is another story entirely, of course, as are semantics, pragmatics, experimental ling, phono pursuits, etc. But for hard syntactic theory I don't think the generative ling is going anywhere.
It's interesting to speculate about what a 'fast follower' model looks like with cars. Cars have been around a long time. You propose that Tesla has sort of v2.0'ed cars with their fast, attractive, semi-autonomous, electric thing. That could be.

But a fast follower model doesn't admit for autonomous cars; nobody is doing anything like that yet. And we are all sort of imagining like the self driving Apple car "carved from a solid billet of aluminium" (cue Jony Ives), I think.

Apple seems to have the market lead in UI/UX, Product Design, Supply Chain and some forms of Silicon. I guess that could all add up to a greenfield effort at just a car, but better.

I think it's more likely that this is a turning point in Apple's strategy, and that they see the need to make some big bets, like Google. In any event, I'm super curious about what will come out in 2020, or whatever.
You have a link to a good guide for beginners on designing and efficiently implementing type checkers?