skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Everyone else charges indirectly. Inclusion is free, you "only" need to go through someone like webtrust who will charge you $100k+ for an audit.
Mobileye cancels Tesla contract
That's an arbitrary, abstract shape. Combined with a near-universal colour association of red for stop/end/abort. It doesn't need an origin.

If stop signs showed the picture of the brake lever from a Ford Model T, you'd have a point.
2018 Cadillac SRX Redesign and Price Range
with respect to "Difficulty upgrading to newer releases":

pg_upgade has a --link option which uses hard links in the new cluster to reference files from the old cluster. This can be a very fast way to do upgrades even for large databases (most of the data between major versions will look the same; perhaps only some mucking with system catalogs is required in the new cluster). Furthermore, you can use rsync with --hard-links to very quickly upgrade your standby instances (creating hard links on the remote server rather than transferring the full data).

that is all referenced in the current documentation:
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/pgupgrade.htm...
Sounds more like you don't use computers the way you used to. I use my computer for software development and music creation. Both experiences are orders of magnitude better on OS X then on Windows 10. On the rare chances I get to play games, I play on Win 10.
Lol guys just buy a gear360, light weight and fits in the palm of your hand. Been using it for months, $350-$400 on Amazon works great!
>Well, what I witnessed may have been outliers, but once you hear a person you care for begging to "please, just make it stop" every time she was able to actually articulate some words instead of screaming in pain... that leaves a mark.

You seem to conflate chronic pain with "living in total agony", like some terminal patient.

People here are not talking about that. Maybe do some reading about what "chronic pain" means medically? It's not just a single thing like the one you described.
> This is true of Windows, any web app that you use, and more and more of any hardware that you buy (Nest, Tesla, etc.).

But not, notably, of Linux.
> For over 5 Apple laptops of various kinds, I've never seen that, with heavy programming/VM use, or DAW and NLE use. A little warmer yes. Ouch, my hands hurt? No. Does that really happen, and can we have some actual temperature measurements, or is it just that some people are too sensitive?

Yes it does happen. I have had two macbook pros, two macbook airs. It happened to every single one of them when it was time for their death. Maybe you've been switching your macbooks before something like that happened. It's not like I get a serious burn but it sure is very irritating and even hurts if I keep it there for too long.

> Those are probably the worst examples to cite, as the original iPhone and iPad were mighty fine. It's mostly with 1st generations of Mac redesigns that things sometimes get bad for some production runs (faults found in new materials/suppliers/designs etc).

I bought the first iPad, and it was super heavy. They came out with a lighter iPad soon after. In my opinion the best timing to buy any Apple product is their second iteration. The second version is always significantly better than the first one and then the perceived variance is not as severe afterwards.

> Compared to which company that is? Because I mostly see either PR projects (like Google glass) or failed semi-copies (Surface capped to 1M unit sales etc).

I'm comparing it to Apple itself. Comparing to other companies has no meaning. Just because other companies are not being innovative doesn't make Apple an innovative company, has nothing to do with each other.
Dropwizard is basically a subset of Spring. Spring can do a REST API just as easily, but also does everything else. I've used both, Dropwizard is great but there's no use case I'd select it over Spring.
Maybe... I'll have to see if I've actually still got them.
> What? How is it okay for safe-place.home to be trusted when an attacker can spoof the DNS resolution upstream (like ISPs already routinely do to point you to ads)?

I guess I was unclear, my point was that I think some TLD should be dedicated for home networks, with ICANN and especially browsers recognizing that.

ISP spoofing wouldn't be an issue because if you used these TLDs then legitimate requests would never reach that far anyway. If not, well, you wouldn't be visiting such domains anyway and there would be nothing to spoof.

> If you curl 192.168.80.1 (assuming that's not within your subnet), your router will happily shoot some packets at your ISP.

But that's not an issue, because if it's not on your subnet then you wouldn't be visiting it in the first place. Any snooping ISP could just as easily make you visit some other address instead that actually did have a TLS certificate, as they could make you visit that. In the worst case, you could make the browser check your subnet mask. But since the contents on those IPs will be unique from local network to local network anyway, I really don't see the point in bothering.
The "formal" specification is the goal, but the starting point is a rather informal specification. So it is an iterative process where you discover a bug and then have to figure out whether the bug is in the implementation or the interpretation of the presentation (i.e. the test).
Freemarker. Why doesn't every template language have macros?
>The jump from QBasic to Quick Basic and understanding .EXEs, compilation etc was the turning point for me in understanding programming, debugging and operating systems.

That's hilarious. I remember I was pissed off: why certain files do stuff and are games and all. How do they do that!

So I created a new .TXT file and changed its extension to .COM and tried to execute it. Then to .EXE.

It didn't work. I don't know what I expected back then, for it to magically do something cool I suppose.

The executables came when I got Visual BASIC for DOS. Wow! You could also make forms with buttons!

It was in on a CD that had a bunch of software on it that came with .NFO files I'd read and wonder "what was that BBS stuff they were talking about. They seem to get together and have fun with computers". They were crews who crack stuff.
That's really not that good. It's a nearly completely isolated and the terminal app is extremely lacking compared to both linux and iTerm2. Also in my short time using it a BUNCH of standard packages, like spacemacs for example, didn't work at all correctly or couldn't be installed.
> They seem to intentionally sabotage the wire that connects the harddrive to the board on macbook pros in order to force you to upgrade.

You mean to prevent you from changing it? Recent MacBooks don't have SATA (instead opting for SSD chips straight on the board with NVMe), but I had one of the last models with a magnetic drive option and I put in a standard SATA SSD with no problem.
Wholeheartedly agree.

I want Windows 10s graphics performance, Linux' kernel/CLI tools/open source mindset and OS X' graphical applications/UI design/integration with my my other devices.

Currently using OS X, but the hardware situation is frustrating (has always been, but currently at it's worst since ~10 years), the software quality is declining and Apple's ongoing direction towards iOS doesn't fit me.

Using Linux on my PC is frustrating, the graphics situation is terrible. All I want is 60 fps vsync'd performance, fluid scrolling, no choppiness when moving or resizing windows. Also, there is still a lack of many important applications (Adobe, MS Office). The whole Gtk vs. Qt situation also aggravates this.

Windows, for me, as a developer, is a total disaster, not only does it differ totally from my usual UNIX environment with it's completely different way of handling files and directories, but I also dislike the software: font rendering is terrible (in my eyes), the switch to UWP is terrible, as is the platform (UWP) itself, to me, the lack of choice is even worse than on OS X. But Windows seems to be the only OS at the moment to run without major problems on hardware of my choice with good graphics performance.

I really wished Linux would get it's graphics stack straight. I know it's not the individual developer's fault (and most certainly, the NVIDIA/AMD didn't help much in the past), but the current situation is still somewhat subpar. Still, the choices at the moment all frustrate me, so I stick to what I have.
> There are valid reasons that long established companies such as Google, Twitter, Facebook and countless others chose MySQL as their primary data store.

I think you're misrepresenting things here. While all do use MySQL for some specific tasks, it's clear that all also have many other central datastores which are not MySQL. In Google's case this is a gross overstatement.
Homepage: http://dune.scs.stanford.edu/

If it will be maintained and language VMs integrate it as optional dependency for the speedup/security features then maybe it will deliver what azul's sortof-failed Managed Runtime Initiative[0] promised.

[0] https://lwn.net/Articles/392307/
As soon as an IPv4 address becomes expensive and IPv6 is not, all of that will change.
> revelations in the emails that party officials had privately rooted

This does little justice to what actually is said in those emails

I mean I don't get why they talk about him timing it to hurt her, he literally said that the next emails he releases will contain “enough evidence” for the Department of Justice to indict Hillary Clinton. [0]

I guess it gets the most media attention now, albeit limited from mainstream publications. I find it annoying that the most coverage from mainstream American publications have been about the leaks and not the content.
More people have opinions on whether the Russians were the source for Wikileaks than about the content of the emails.

[0]: http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-06-12/assange-on-peston-...
This is correct. Some emergency brakes uses a screw mechanism to activate the brake cylinder piston to push on the pads. Same stopping mechanism as if you push on the brake pedal.

Others (usually less expensive cars) have a set of drum brakes inside the disk brake that act as emergency brakes.

If you have rear drum brakes, it's the same as my first example. The emergency brake activates the normal braking system.
Not sure why would that be a problem.
Win 10 can run ELF binaries now. That doesn't make it an integrated *nix like system (sadly!).
I think that Tesla's tech is not an advantage. What they do have however is thousands of vehicles driving around every day collecting training data. They may have the largest collection of real-world training data for self-driving learning on the planet.
> I really wonder why people seem to like Finder over Windows Explorer.

I work on both daily as well. I can give some commentary on that. Coming from Windows, I initially hated Finder, but I prefer it now. The controls scheme is more consistent to me, and things I liked about the Windows setup was purely because I used Windows first.

* Navigating the folder structure:
OSX: Cmd+down to drill down. Cmd+up to move up a directory. Cmd+down to open a file.
Windows: Enter to move down. Alt+up to move up a directory. Enter to open the file.

* Renaming a folder or file
OSX: Enter. Hands can remain on the home key for immediate typing of new name.
Windows: F2. F2? Why? Hand has to fly off home position. And it's such a random key. I'm sure there's a historical reason, but from an end user's perspective, why that F key vs any other F key?

* Open file dialog (I believe each OS uses their file manager to power it)
OSX: Not in the right directory, but have an instance of Finder open that is? Just drag in the target directory into the dialog, and it will smartly switch to that folder.
Windows: If you try that, it freaks out. Navigate manually.
As an engineer, I try to imagine what the risk analysis for the Tesla cars look like for the Autopilot functionality.

Multiple warnings would seem to me to be insufficient to reduce the hazard presented by the Autopilot functionality; indeed, there are any number of videos of Tesla drivers using the vehicle contra to the warnings. As one specific example, consider that the Tesla Autopilot cautions the driver to maintain hands on the wheel[0], yet does not enforce this requirement[1] despite having the capability to do so[2]. There's also a problem with Musk viz. marketing: he's the very public face of the company, and he is frequently overly optimistic in describing the car's capabilities by blurring the line between current and future capabilities, e.g., implying that holding the wheel isn't critical with a wink-wink, nudge-nudge[3].

Tesla's PLM certainly has some sort of mechanism to continuously examine the risk analysis for the car, yet the Autopilot functionality doesn't seem to have been significantly updated to incorporate the changing risk profile. To add on all of this, why does Autopilot allow one to speed? Why can one enable Autopilot on a road such as the exemplar if it is contrary to the instructions and the car is capable of knowing the difference? What does the risk analysis say on the topic of the feature name "Autopilot" being misunderstood by the public? &c. &c.

I do wonder about the engineering processes at Tesla. I admittedly don't work in automotive, but I do work in a regulated industry, and Tesla's apparent engineering process makes me very uneasy. Risk analyses that I have done took into account that the user may not have read the instructions for use, and I struggle to understand how Tesla could not do the same.

[0] "Drivers must keep their hands on the steering wheel." https://www.tesla.com/presskit/autopilot

[1] "We drove for 10 miles without the message appearing." http://www.teslarati.com/what-happens-ignore-tesla-autopilot...

[2] It's not clear that they have a capacitance sensor as on properly-equipped Mercedes, but Teslas allegedly can detect minute torques applied to the steering wheel as happens when the wheel is held. I recall reading this about the Teslas, but can't find a citation at the moment.

[3] “It works almost to the point where you can take your hands off,” Musk laughs, “but we won’t say that. Almost.” http://www.wired.com/2015/10/tesla-self-driving-over-air-upd... also, "But by April, he told a conference that Autopilot was "almost twice as good as a person," even in its first version." and from the same, "Musk himself has retweeted news reports showing drivers using Autopilot with no hands on the wheel." http://www.autonews.com/article/20160705/OEM06/160709956/tes...
Methinks you misunderstand the programming experience of FP. A nice property of 'equational reasoning' is that, as a universal property of code, I don't have to think about it. It just becomes a law of code - conservation of meaning. Abstraction, splicing, refactoring, and reuse happens easily and fluidly because I don't need to think about whether those actions are safe or correct. It isn't about hand-wavy abstract worlds at all, but rather concrete manipulation of source code. Concrete examples are also very common and useful with pure FP, e.g. use of REPLs is common.

A pure `World→World` effects model is NOT a practical equivalent to introducing side-effects. Unlike with side-effects, it's trivial to constrain a subprogram from access to the whole World, e.g. use divide and conquer tactics to hide parts of the world, or limit a subprogram to a constrained subset of monadic commands that an interpreter uses to access and update the world in limited ways.

No experience from the 70s left academics or industry prepared to support purely functional IO models. It should go without saying that you can't have a complete programming paradigm without an effective story for IO. Miranda, an attempt at a purely functional language of the mid 80s, made a valiant attempt at pure IO, and failed. Even early Haskell, up through the early 90s lacked an effective, coherent story for IO. I find your repeated assertions that pure FP was somehow a child of the 70s to be very dubious.
That's terrifying. You should do whatever it is that makes Linux have good fonts.

http://i.imgur.com/AawrGCc.png
Spy Agency Consensus Grows That Russia Hacked D.N.C
Like everything it's a spectrum. Those are incidents of outright fraud, but most of it is far more gray. It's the boyfriend/girlfriend hired onto staff as an assistant who only actually comes into the office 3 days a week. It's the trip that's an extra day for no good reason.

That being said, I think much of the grayness is for a reason. Brutal frugality will choke a business nearly as much as overspending.
>I bought the first iPad, and it was super heavy. They came out with a lighter iPad soon after.

Well, I had the first iPad, and have been using it for a god 4-5 years until I got an iPad 4. It being heavy is just what the technology afforded at the time, not some unique case of making the customer a guinea pig.

>* I'm comparing it to Apple itself. Comparing to other companies has no meaning. Just because other companies are not being innovative doesn't make Apple an innovative company, has nothing to do with each other.*

Innovative (which I dislike as a word in general for this use, as people conflate it with anything, from primary physics research to new case designs) is relative.

Some company is innovative because others make less new things. If HP for example produced marvels of novel technology year after year since 1999, then we wouldn't call Apple or anyone else innovative with the "mere updates" they've put out (in comparison).
It feels you're being a bit specific. Look for good marketing advice and the principles are very transferable. E.g. Read 'Ogilvy on Advertising' as a guide on how to communicate your product. The product is largely irrelevant if you understand the method of pitching.
Does any current optical technology work any better in rain and fog? Not that 'optical' is a requirement anyway - what is needed is anything that does work.
Growth marketing platform for eCommerce brands
Interesting. This is a complex issue.

I have those types of issues too. Most of us do once we get old enough.

They don't really bother me. Like yours, I can overcome them. Almost everyone does.

I suspect if either of us had trained all our lives to be, and wanted to be professional runners, it would bother us greatly.
Getting a signature machine is the way to go. Not having all that crapware installed is good.

I am tired of Verizon installing crapware on my android phones so I am going for a Google device with the Fi service when I need a new phone.

One thing Apple does well is not loading crapware.
Yes, I'll happily go there - it's a flaw. I'm not "pushing" apt, I used it as an example with a slightly better way of handling source. At this point, I probably should be running Gentoo/Nix/Guix (but I should also be running Qubes) but my investment in Debian has been too compelling. I'm well aware of sticky path dependence retarding progress, which is exactly why I'm nonplussed about working around the base assumptions of the "web" to make free software.
I highly recommend Ellenberg's "How Not To Be Wrong". Ellenberg is a first-class mathematician and general expositor, and his book illustrates the power (and the limitation, in an endearing way) of mathematics as a tool of thought.
> Yes, WPAD (web proxy auto discover) is for locating a piece of javascript code specified by Proxy auto-config [1], which consists of a single javascript function that is given the url & the host, and returns a proxy to use.

So DHCP can cause my browser to execute code. That is … completely and totally insane. I'm not saying you're wrong, but rather that you're right about about a world gone mad.
Shorting? not yet, but considering it.

FUD? I said Tesla doesn't have any defendable moats. Reading your post I appear to be correct. All Tesla has is some additional experience and (perhaps) better talent in a few areas. All things easily addressed by investment - which it's investors are well positioned to do, better positioned than Tesla, in fact.
Once again: Why should immigrants be penalized?
40 million for the iPhone alone is practically nothing!?!? Sure it's down but people on HN are a little crazy acting like Apple is going to go under because of this.
Take a look at Windows 8 with the Modern interface. Then dive into the settings. It very quickly kicks you out of the Modern interface to do some operations, even on the ARM tablet that didn't official have a desktop. Even if you're on a touchscreen, it makes you tap tiny radio buttons. At least OS X has a consistent user interface.

Funny you mention building your own, I got my first Mac when I got fed up with building and maintaining my own PC. I bought some new RAM and plugged it in, and suddenly it stopped booting. I put the old RAM back in, and it wouldn't boot with the old RAM either. This was the straw that broke the camel's back, after I had gotten fed up with rebooting every week for updates, overheating issues that had been starting to pop up, and how ridiculously loud the fans were for a not-that-good desktop. I was looking at a Surface, but plenty of people are like "oh it's great, but there are some driver issues". It's a first-party machine. There should be no driver issues. Zero.

I bought a Macbook that same day. Everything I was complaining about sounds completely normal to a PC enthusiast. "Of course you're getting overheating, just put more fans in." "Of course the fans are loud, put in more, bigger, slower fans." "Just disable automatic updates and reboot when it's convenient." "Just replace the motherboard."

It's completely asinine. If my car needed that much constant maintenance I'd call it a lemon and demand my money back. I have work to do, and it doesn't involve building a computer to do it.
I am from Senegal. I just got back to the states from a trip there. They are equally free. There are certainly differences in opportunities and social pressure, but essentially they are the same. I know women in all sort of jobs in Senegal, and quite to the contrary money is not a huge motivation for the educated ones because men are expected to take care of their families/bills.
What makes music sound “good?”
That's a weird meaning of theirs, then. Intact comes from "not touched".
Wald's airplane damage story is a favorite example of one of my statistics professors. Humbling example of how statistics can easily be misinterpreted, at least for me. I can see myself making this kind of mistake (that the officers made).
To be honest, I think BMW would have made exactly that mistake because nobody in Germany would ever be stupid enough to build a 65mph freeway with an uncontrolled crossing like that. And don't get me started on those highways on the east coast that have on ramps leading into the fast lane.
I thought it might at least be something like the SSTV messages in the Portal ARG, which sounds a lot like modem noise.
Yup. He and I have a good relationship, plus he's willing to entertain well meaning debate. When he says, "my door is open," it's for real.

But I told him, "long term computer use will kill you. Get a standing desk."
meanwhile Otto has become deprecated and the authors suggest going with RxAndroid
Excerpt from the article:

The Crowdstrike report ... concludes that the Federal Security Service, known as the F.S.B., entered the committee’s networks last summer.

The G.R.U., a competing, military intelligence unit, was a later arrival. Investigators believe it is the G.R.U. that has played a bigger role in releasing the emails.

(end of quote)

One has to wonder: who else was wandering through the DNC's computers?
What is the difference between "hoarding cash" and "saving" besides the fact that one sounds evil and the other virtuous?

(I don't intend that as a rhetorical question - I'm sincerely asking.)
Ground-penetrating radar does: http://news.mit.edu/2016/pinpointing-vehicles-with-high-prec...
At some point, the owners of capital are going to have to just start distributing a greater share of their profit as wages. Any other solution for stagnant wages is just making excuses for antisocial behavior.