skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I believe that case was covered in the most recent episode of the podcast "More Perfect", from the makers of RadioLab: http://www.wnyc.org/story/giggly-blue-robot
Would the shitty BA matter for someone who isn't used to harder opiates or would it flat out be useless? His character makes of point to talk about how he's careful to not get addicted.
Absolutely, I was talking about this with my wife yesterday.

It's illegal for a women to go topless in France (but not a man), so how is a women covering her breasts any different than a woman covering her head? I can't imagine anything less welcoming than being a recent refugee or immgrant, and then in order to receive an education you are forced to break with a core tenet of your religious and cultural beliefs, and as a poster below pointed out, feel naked in your new school.
It's probably not just in the last century though
People often assumed that if you had something physical, you had something mental as well.
If I had money to bet, and I had to bet it on a long shot, then I'd bet on "mobile AR" that more closely resembles Google Glass than the Rift, Vive, GearVR, etc.

I think mobile AR glasses could dethrone the smartphone as the communication/utility/entertainment device that nearly everyone uses. The glasses would look like "normal" prescription glasses. In their default "off" state they would function like normal prescription glasses (and sunglasses when outdoors). When turned on, they show the user essentially a large smartphone like display. The various lists, images, etc could be manipulated with small hand gestures near the users' laps.

I've done a fair amount of VR development. I've tried the Vive, GearVR, and Google Glass. The discomfort level of current generation VR headsets is, in my opinion, a deal-breaker. This is ignoring nausea.
> Power resides where people believe it resides

Also, sometimes power resides where the military decides.
For the record, I wasn't thinking of Darude's Sandstorm when I named the project. :)

EDIT: What I was thinking, at the time, was "sandbox in the cloud". But these days I like to retcon the name to be about granularity. Sandstorm's major technological innovation is fine-grained containerization, which is described in detail here: https://sandstorm.io/how-it-works
"Set theory is the 'assembly language' of mathematics. Type theory is the 'functional language' of mathematics."
And to serve that private gTLD to others, you'll need a reachable IP address. :)
Atlassian acquires status communication platform StatusPage
And is it actually revolution if those with power are simply exercising their power? Can the powerless even stage a successful revolution?
I will never believe it.
>I want the fecal matter OUTSIDE my house TYVM.

i guess you built an outhouse for yourself?
If you like democracy, you can't exactly be in favor of Erdogan either. Not to mention what will likely happen, if the coup fails.

In the long term, this coup succeeding is probably the best option for democracy.
> There is a very real sense in which "anarchy" -- a kind of lack of predictably -- is always the resultant state after a large enough change to a power structure

If this is the kind of anarchy you envision, you're going to be sorely disappointed if something like that happened in real life. Real anarchy would look more like how people would react if zombies broke out. There would be mass looting, killings, raping, and people taking advantage of the chaos (opportunists). It would literally be the wild west with all services, including power and the internet going down.

The "anarchy" in Mr. Robot is a falsehood, it's a libertarian/hackers fantasy. That's not anarchy at all. Not even close.
From what I understood they are not providing a cash stipend:

> €35 (£29; $39) per asylum seeker per day from the central government in Rome. This has to cover everything, from accommodation, food and medical care to Italian language lessons, work placements and assistance with asylum bureaucracy.It also includes a couple of euros for pocket money.

What is not clear is: do they give a migrant 35 "fake" euros and tell him to do everything himself, or do they just do this on the food part, but still provide housing etc.

An exploit I could think of is if a local Italian goes and buys the migrants "food stamps" for let's say 80% of their price. The migrants would be free to buy anything with real € but he would pay an unnecessary 20% tax to the Italian. And the Italian would be able to buy 20% discounted food. That's not a huge amount of money at stake: Only whatever the Italian consumes in food over the year. And the migrant would need to be stupid/greedy to trade all of his fake € as he also need them for food.
I am following this now since 3 hours live from local people through Youtube, Twitter and Periscope. Amazing what technology can enable. I respect those Platforms now a lot.
Evaluation order of logical operators and their precedence
FWIW the submitter (who isn't affiliated with Sandstorm AFAIK) explains his reasoning here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12104373

But lots and lots has changed in the last year. :)
Its funny how Putin and Erdogan were meeting a couple of days ago. Maybe Erdogan was warned and took "a vacation"?
It is interesting. Wonder how you are making the call that FB code is of higher quality.
>[…] at the risk of near term economic pain that the remainers shouted from the roof-tops […]

>They did it anyway, because long term, they will be better off.

You make it seem like a fact and not what the leavers were shouting from the rooftops.
> general proofs instead of software proofs,

one of the most bizarre statements I've seen on HN
Simply a repost - not a relaunch. And it might be new to a significant number of people. Personally I'm glad to see it hit the front page again.
Aquaponics has numerous benefits compared to traditional gardening.

Plants have plenty of water being on the obvious ones.

Also, they tend to be fairly low maintenance once set up correctly. Just add food (most fish can go up to a week without feeding without any negative consequences if needs be).

Water usage is much lower (evaporation and what is absorbed into the plants is the only loss).

Plants grow better (they have easier access to nutrients and plenty of water).

The negatives are that the upfront costs are much more and you have to have some knowledge of the Nitrogen cycle and creating a comfortable environment for your fish.
OS seems a little presumptuous. As does the majority of the "how it works" page. Making wildly ridiculous claims that amount to "microservice are silly" (my paraphrase) when really they've only managed to successfully sandbox applications. Much like Android with its "a user for every app by default."

> Sandstorm takes a wildly different approach [than containerized services]: It containerizes objects, where an object is primarily defined by data

Or... You've containerized the data access service and enforced a per-application sandbox. Plenty of precedent there.

>
Microservices are seemingly designed to match the developer’s mental model of their system. Often, services are literally divided by the team who maintains them.

Good Lord, I sure hope that's not true. Maybe if the non-technical manager designed the system.

> In the Sandstorm model, all of the components (from web server to database) needed to handle a particular grain run on the same machine.

So your container scheduler can optimize for I/O. Again not that far from existing cloud schedulers.

I'm not saying this isn't a powerful model or platform.
I am saying that I'm very disinclined to want to work on such a platform, purely because I'm worried its developers buy into the "everybody else is way off base" attitude, when really they're only doing what many many successful architectures have done before them.
Two trucks and a few soldiers lined in a row like ducks. A tank sitting alone.

If the coup you're executing results in civilians being able to seize a tank and police having soldiers in custody, the coup lacked the overwhelming ingredient and swift execution that would paralyze and kill any hope of resisting.

It needed to be clear that the deal was sealed to morally crush anyone willing to resist and make them understand that it's done and they'd better line up with the winning party.

Civilians seizing a tank means they sized the military presence and said "Meh.. we're going for it anyway".

An example of a well executed coup: The Algerian coup in 1965. Algerians woke up in the morning and found tanks in the streets of the capital, but it wasn't the beginning of the coup. It had already taken place. Tanks didn't really surprise because Gillo Pontecorvo was shooting "The Battle of Algiers" during that period and also used tanks (one of the greatest movies. Music by Ennio Morricone).

The President was seized in his bed during the night, they woke him up and he was made prisoner for 15 years (liberated by the subsequent President after Boumédiène's death). The coup's instigator had the control of the Army and Intelligence before.

There are many people who don't know there was a coup in 1965.
Google Codelabs provide a guided, tutorial, hands-on coding experience
The study touches on the central problem with the practice of architecture in the US: pretending the central ethical issue of architecture is the integrity of the architect's aesthetic vision [or less charitably, that architects tend to believe their own bullshit]. Lundy's approach was correct and the collaborative approach is what makes the Sarasota School the most important architectural movement in American history.

Lundy is quite a contrast to Phillip Johnson. Like the other giants of the Sarasota School, Twitchell and Rudolph, Lundy was a veteran [1]. Johnson was an early fan of the Nazi's [2] -- something my mentor, the late David Crane FAIA, never could forgive.

[1]: Lundy's wartime sketchbooks at the Library of Congress: https://www.loc.gov/pictures/search/?q=LOT%2014007&fi=number...

[2]: A recent article: http://www.vanityfair.com/culture/2016/04/philip-johnson-naz...
I think you're using the common US political definition of "liberal" (which is close to a synonym for "progressive" or often even just "Democrat"), whereas at least to the point of your grandparent comment, my interpretation is that the definition being used is more like "classical liberalism"[0]. I'm not trying to be pedantic, but this is a common and unfortunate confusion that makes these conversations extremely muddy.

[0]: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_liberalism
Are you not allowed to pair during the day?
Well incubators are really cool for a younger person with no family and kind of not good for older people with houses and families. I would be interested in hearing about anyone 35+ with a family and house who made YC work.

So that would be my guess on a large segment of the population that dont persue incubators. And if you dont apply obviously you wont have an offer to accept or reject.
I think it's "Harder Better Faster Stronger"
> Linux: Sleep. Wait for the kernel to wake you up when something happens so you can yell “IS ANYONE READY YET? HOW ABOUT NOW?!” at your file descriptors.

> FreeBSD: Like Linux, but the API is less stupid.

Yeah, I covered epoll (and kqueue, which also applies to Solaris and OS X).
This plus overriding fonts with poor legibility or poor screen legibility is what I do too. The linked color scheme is a little too low-contrast for me personally, but the dark grey-on-cream option in mobile safari's reader mode is just about right. White/cream on off-black is also generally pleasant.

Also, a "retina" display makes more of a difference than you'd guess until you use one or notice until you don't have one. I always get an unpleasant period of adaptation when I break out the netbook after several weeks with only a MacBook Pro. Heck, even my phone is easier to read on.
All the random domain sha1 like domain names are confusing. I also dislike that many of the apps have missing features compared to the actual apps and they get embedded in iframes. I understand all these are done for security.

Related: https://cloudron.io. Unlike sandstorm, it's docker based and has a very good app store - https://cloudron.io/appstore.html.
Apparently Mercurial still accounts for 10% of BitBucket repos. That could be a profitable niche for a smaller company.

Also, most of the projects I've seen switch to Git have moved to GitHub. Partly network effects, partly Atlassian.
The comparison between Hitler and Trump is not naive in any way. There are very logical, direct comparisons: blanket generalizations of a specific minority group, quick rise-to-power from populist hate-centric rhetoric, and lack of political or governmental experience.
If document have handwriting on it, so how can get them after scanning document.
Yes, the cycling instructions are included in the manual.
Memestorm
Wow, small world! I was listening to that when I opened this article.
Even if that is true, politically supporting the funding of social services doesn't indicate generosity. Giving your own money would be generous. Giving away other people's money - not so much.
Hmm, I don't think the fish food is that much more expensive than fertilizer. Also, by eliminating the fish, you... eliminate the fish harvest, which many people would find desirable.
You might have tried draw.io which according to the reviews is not supported anymore.
An ISP will block ports -- the goal is top stop spam -- but nothing requires you to use the traditional SMTP ports that are used for spam. Because you're not sending spam.

You are sending email to people you know, on a port you have agreed to, who also have reachable IP addresses and will accept connections from your IP address.

ISP's are not going to do DPI on open ports like 22, 80, or 443 or any high port, in order to filter out SMTP traffic. Why would they bother?

If you must use the existing "email provider" system -- e.g., you need to send commercial email -- then you must use the standardized ports they use, and yes, you must jump through their hoops. And you will experience spam and other nuisances. It's supposed to be open and decnetralized, but the reality is it's quite centralized because everyone relies on "major email providers".

But there's nothing about SMTP protocol that requires anyone to use an "email provider" or any specific port, nor to accept email from all IP addresses.

Two people can communicate directly via SMTP on a non-standard port and can choose to filter by IP address.

Maybe no one does this anymore, but I've done it; it's possible.

It's not that difficult to set up. The showstopper is not the set up, nor the ISP filtering port 25. It's that most people do not have a reachable IP address.
> Another consideration is that people's costs are strongly related to where they live.

I think what's more important is that their competing offers from local companies will necessarily be higher, so assuming they're worth the higher price, you have to pay it.
This is a great resource! I would have loved to have had it in undergrad. I ended up reading a semi-expensive used copy of 100% Mathematical Proof by Rowan Garnier and John Taylor for my Abstract Algebra class.
This is similar to the US system, except that our Speaker of the House has less power than the Prime Minister, and our President has (a lot) more power than the monarch.
The light bulb conspiracy is, frankly, a load of shit.

What was really happening is the consumers were choosing which lightbulbs to buy primarily on their rated lifespan. So, because of this market pressure, manufacturers naturally started developing lightbulbs with longer and longer lifespan.

This is actually easy to do. Basically, the cooler the filament, the longer the lifespan of the bulb. This also had the side effect of reducing light output at a given wattage, so people also started buying higher-wattage lightbulbs to compensate.

Basically there was a tradeoff between light bulb longevity, and efficiency.

The manufacturers realized that this trend would waste huge amounts of electricity, and was unsustainable in the long term so they got together and decided to all standardize on set design lifespan that they thought was about the sweet-spot between lifespan, and efficiency.

This stopped everyone competing on lifespan, and instead shifted the focus of the marketplace competition to cost, and efficiency, which the manufacturers judged was more helpful to everyone.

In short, the "lightbulb conspiracy" was not an example of manufacturers colluding to screw the consumer for their own benefit - the intent was actually to help everyone in the long term, while sacrificing their own individual short-term profits.
Please. Someone should tell the author that React is NOT a framework. Just a UI lib.
Thanks bcheung, you got them! I'll post what I had in a previous comment:

Here are just a few advantages over a traditional garden:

* You get fish

* Better yield, due to items mentioned below

* The optimal watering cycle, followed by a drain cycle, means the plants get the air, water, and nutrients they need multiple times a day.

* The water being reused means you need only 10% of it

* Going organic is really easy: just feed the fish organic fish feed

* No soil diseases

* Virtually no weeds (I’ve picked ~3 weeds over the course of the 1.5 years I ran my initial proof-of-concept prototype)

* Minimal maintenance: only need to plant, harvest, prune, and feed the fish
Most Probable Birth Month
Another passing in my college lineage. Studied under Glem Langdon (passed a few years back), Huffman (a few years prior to that), I recall Shannon passing.

Glen Langdon and David Huffman I knew from UC Santa Cruz. Shannon and Fano, I only heard stories about. Jorma Rissanen is still alive at the age of 98.

Pillars in compression and information theory.
>So basically, you believe dangerous people should remain in society?

>Habitual criminals should continue to terrorize innocents such as yourself and your family, and you wouldn't even call the police?

One of these sentences is a reasonable, if a bit reductive, summary of the GP's point. The other is wild hyperbole.

Fully half of the comment I'm replying to is total nonsense, putting words in another's mouth, disingenuously representing another's opinion in the hope of making that person seem monstrous.

To what end, gwkoehler? Is your position so tenuous that you feel you must misrepresent your opponent's? If your comments weren't an attempt at a counterargument, is it really so important to tell kiliantics that you disagree with his opinion and wish to paint it as unwise?
Episodes are filmed 6 months to a year ago. Would it be a 0-day at that point? I remember when 0-day actually meant brand new (typically a release on that particular day), but that was 15-20 years ago. Over that time, the definition could have changed.
And ultimately, writes resulting from those reads. I imagine yelp has pretty stout analytics/metrics pipeline fed off views and conversion tracking.
While I don't agree with the French approach of regulating dress, one of their arguments is that you do affect other people with your choice of how to dress, and that people should not have to be subjected to certain overt expressions of religion in certain contexts, with schools being a particularly sensitive topic because of their position in passing on the ideals of the republic.

I think they go way too far, and a that some of it is bigotry hiding behind the excuse of secularism, but it illustrates that determining what sufficiently negatively "affects others" to be worth sanction can be used to reach widely different conclusions..
That's funny that you mention democracy and oppression of women. Ancient Greeks of Athens and the other city states kept their women cloistered out of public. Women had no rights and were basically chattel in these societies.

Democracy is like technology, morally neutral yet capable of great good or terrible inhumanity.
What I found interesting is that I (a straight, male) get a far higher match percentage in the D.C. area than in the S.F. Bay Area

SF has an unusually lopsided gender ratio, with more college-educated men than women, while almost all other major metro areas skew towards having more women than men. Jon Birger's Date-onomics covers this: http://jakeseliger.com/2015/09/19/briefly-noted-date-onomics..., and I rather liked it.
That's nice for the local economy. Not as nice for the non-local people who would have received money but didn't. I bet some of them really could have used the cash.

Whether or not this is a good thing overall depends on your priorities, but remember that the consequences of a decision include not only the things that happen because of it but also the things that don't happen because of it -- and the former are much more visible, so it's easy to accidentally forget about the latter.
It's good for young people same as college. The value is in credentialing (and notch in belt confidence building). You learn most professional lessons while doing your job which has little to nothing to do with YC per se.
The way obscenity laws in the US and the states work is that these drawn images will always be looked at as obscene.

The standard currently used for obscene is

(a)whether the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole,appeals to the prurient interest

(b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law

(c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value

Now, would the 'average American' find lilocon/shotacon to be excessively focused on sex? (yes) would it be found offensive under applicable laws, in this case child porn laws (yes). Would the 'average American' take any random manga as having serious literary or artistic value? (no). So, is lolicon/shotacon illegal? It sure is.

The problem with the above is it is not a measurable standard, it is left up to interpretation, and that interpretation will come down on the side of obscene with anything that is not regarded mainstream. Not that long ago homosexual porn was, and in some states it's still difficult to sell sex toys because of obscenity laws. Obscenity laws are used as an end run around the First Amendment for these cases, as it was here. You can say it wasn't because of the PROTECT Act, but the fact remains he had to plead guilty to possession of shotacon and he was facing the penalties of the PROTECT Act because the court could go ahead and call it obscene to bypass the problem of explicitly calling something illegal.

Images of children engaging in sex, or lilocon/shotacon are considered illegal in the US as kiddy porn, either by the PROTECT act explicitly in jurisdictions outside that courts ruling, or by obscenity laws in general. And that is disgusting because it is a thought crime.

The exception would be Oregon which shot down general obscenity laws in their entirety.
Link to Preprints for International Conference on Functional Programming '16
Thanks! :) Gonna add this to the list of books I need to read.
Let's chat if you have a minute. Email in profile.
That's how it works in multi-party parliaments. It's very rare for one party to get more than 50% so instead the largest minority party (or constellation of parties) gets selected to form a government. NSDAP was that party in Germany in 1932.

It's only in the American and English systems where there are only two options to choose from that a leader can claim "majority" support.