skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> they just start from different axioms

I think they're also more likely to turn a blind eye to cases where the buildout of their model doesn't hold true. They could, for example, start out with the belief that the bible is the literal word of God, but hand wave away the fundamental contradictions you can find between different parts of it. (How many angels visited Jesus, exactly who did Cain think would kill him for being a vagabond, etc.) That's not just doing math from different first principles, it's changing the arithmetic rules as you go to fit the answer you want to produce.
GNU/Emacs has nice tail-f functionality with its auto-revert-tail-mode.
It doesn't much matter how "similar" they are. Unless you can copy and paste the code you're building new stuff and running the risk of encountering all the issues inherent in building new stuff.
This is awesome! I wasn't expecting "I had enough" at all.
It does look good. I wonder how good its group video chat is.

I've been looking for something a little better than GoToMeeting (which is nice but clunky), which we migrated to from Google Hangouts (which generally terrible and also clunky).

My hope was that Slack would launch this quickly, since they acquired Screenhero, but nothing has happened.

For organizational purposes, group chat does need smooth screen sharing, something GTM is quite decent at (but again, not great: For example, only one person share their screen; the "presenter" has to give their presenter role to someone else). Doesn't look like Wire has this yet.
I was visiting my home town recently and ran into a former neighbor that is a Trump supporter. His answer for "great again" was that when he was younger his entire family had middle class incomes and nobody that he recalled received direct government assistance. Now, he says about a third of his family can't get by without help from the government and he sees the increasing dependence as bad for the family and for the country.
Small piece of trivia: the paper that laid of the reporter, the Lawrence Journal-World, is where Django was born: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2015/jul/09/happy-birthday-djan...

Sad to see the newspaper going through hard times now.
Introducing Vulkan-Hpp – Open-Source Vulkan C++ API
There are other kind of businesses where estimation is hard.

Producing movies, for example. Even if you cast established actors and limit yourself to low-risk sequels of successful franchises, chances of box office bomb are substantial. Book publishing would be even better example; thankfully, writing a book is dirt cheap comparing to developing software or making movies. Pharmaceutic research is absolutely unpredictable — but big pharma companies are usually quite profitable, like software companies (their research/production patterns are similar).

New software development is _always_ innovation (because, if your problem is already solved by existing software, it is way cheaper to buy this software instead — as cost of production is close to zero compared to the cost of development). Innovation is _always_ unpredictable. Building the business on innovation is therefore a hard problem.
100% confidence in any estimate is impossible, that's what makes it an estimate.
Apple Forgot to Scrub the EXIF Data from This OS X Wallpaper
Nothing you said was heavy. You just didn't say anything [or much] that seemed to be on track to my (or apparently your original) point. Thanks, though.
Yes, that his ties to his Mexican heritage would suggest that he would be biased specifically against Donald Trump due to Trump's position on Mexican immigration. This is not a particularly strong argument but it's hardly racist. Racist would be some unconnected national lawsuit controversy where the judge made a questionable decision and Trump said 'what do you expect? he's Mexican.'

The judge in question was a member of an ethnic/activist Hispanic lawyer's group. Imagine if the judge presiding over a case with a prominent African American plaintiff turned out to be a member of 'The Dallas Lawyers Association for White Culture' or something. I doubt that everyone who pointed this out would be considered racist.
What is the point in developing non-innovative, predictable software, if it is much cheaper to buy it instead?