skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Bad judging all around here.

Just because a home computer might be hacked does not mean that an average user doesn't expect his experience on that computer to be private. Every area of life might be breached by determined intruders and, if that were the test of having a expectation of privacy, then every area of life would flunk it. Your home, your car, your bathroom, your bedroom, you name it. In reality, of course, break-ins, hacks, and other intrusions are the exception and not the rule in the areas we commonly regard as private. If the legal test on protecting privacy were to turn on whether break-ins or hacks were a regular element of the environment (however infrequent), then the exception swallows the rule and privacy is no more. This judge's ruling essentially embraces such logic and is thus wildly out of line with existing law regarding protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.

Also bad judging in reaching the issue gratuitously: the main issue here was whether a particular warrant was misused; it was unnecessary to decide what would have happened without a warrant of any kind. Yet the judge reached to inject his obiter dictum into the analysis as a sort of by-the-by, "here is what I would rule if other issues were before me."

Why such an outcome? As the lawyers say, "hard facts make for bad law." You have a despicable perp doing vile things and the natural instinct is to want to nail him. Just as, conversely, when you have a sympathetic person who has being seriously wronged, the natural instinct is to do what you can to help him get justice. In either case, judges and juries will be more prone than otherwise to engage in results-oriented jurisprudence and will thus try to bend and shape the law to that purpose even if the law objectively says otherwise. This factor may help explain why the judge did what he did. It does not make it right.

Finally, bad judging means, in this case, bad precedent and this decision will surely have pernicious effects until the day comes when its run is ended by a higher court. For this case, that day will surely come. It is a bad decision all around.
Pardon my ignorance, but how is that possible?
Not comedy. One reason for "quartering soldiers" was to obtain evidence and to intimidate within a private space. I've long held any form of broadly imposed in-privacy monitoring (including compulsory back door keys) is a 3rd Amendment violation, especially if the individual is practically paying for it.
I think chinese have moral and ethical judgement, its just that their culture has other values of what is moral or ethical. I think Intellectual Property is the creation of the Western Culture, do not expect everyone to accept it, or at least not in the form the West uses it. I emigrated to Europe from Russia so I think I understand them a bit more. I remember the times when you had nothing to eat in the 90's, because you had no money or better to say that the money lost value too fast. It was insane to spend it on "Intellectual Property". You can steal food, but how can you steal IP? I am sorry, it just doesn't feel real to me, no matter the amount of propaganda.
On the other hand I understand, if you use software without paying the developer, he will have nothing to eat too, so I pay for it, its just no property there that changes hands.
Also US manipulate their currency too, like take more debt and print more money.
I think your post is very one sided and I dont feel any pity. I mean US sells places in their universities to the highest bidder and then you complain that the highest bidder is you competition?
The ruling is about whether one has a 4th amendment right to privacy with regard to criminal investigations. You'd still be violating, at a minimum, the CFAA if you broke into someone else's private computer. There are exemptions in the CFAA for exactly this kind of investigatory activity.

But the ruling won't hold, because it is dumb and bad.
For what it's worth, I have my doubts that this applies to a generic call/sms on any old Android device.

Does it matter? This is completely in line with their privacy strategy the last few years. Slowly add new terms to the privacy policy, so that people find it acceptable. When asked, point to some unharmful or obvious application. At any rate, it makes it possible to do what the article stated. And since a lot of stuff happens in Google Play Services these days, it becomes kind of hard to find out how the privacy statement is operationalized.
Well there are 2 bar graphs and 1 line graph in addition to "the feeling"
My guess:

> "Equity: 0.1% - 2% for the ‘right person’."
I agree that constexpr if looks great. I am confused about the decision on how to handle static_assert. It seems that

if constexpr (false) { static_assert(false); }

Will fail to compile because the static_assert will trigger. This seems strange to me, anybody have an idea what the reasoning here is?
So kittens are a metaphor for women? I never knew that. I know sushi in German sounds a little like pussy [Muschi/Sushi], so maybe next time don't use kittens, use pictures of sushi -not many will get it. I mean, if they'd chosen flowers, or dogs, almost anything, one can put alternate meanings to them.

But really, who'd make that connection, given the kitten meme? I think it was over thinking on her part.

That said, maybe have everyone adopt an Asian style ethic and dress drab for work. It's work, it's not impress your high school friends with new clothes at the beginning of the school year.
Eh yeah of course you can, I updated my comment. Thanks.
And I thought I am cynical enough to no longer be surprised by GOV's process to circumvent the Constitution and make nineteen eighty-four the reality. I was wrong.

As a long-time IT Guy who has grown tired and disgusted with GOV's fascist, class-war behavior, with this court decision I say to them:

Bring. It. The. FSCK. On.

While maintaining an air-gapped rig is a PITA, I can do that.

While conducting my Connected Life via a live image, removable-media-based system is a PITA, I can do that as well.

While good encryption slathered on everything is annoying, it is doable.

BTW, GOV... As long as you are connected to a network, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy;

Expect your thoughts and beliefs laid bare; your plans to be known by others sooner, rather than later; your secrets to be learned by all;

You want to see what Cyber Warfare _truly_ looks like?

You can't handle the truth.
but why do you garden with transgenics! It's unnatural!
I'm betting on:

> We’ll have a large variety of alcohol in the office as well as an assortment of video games for the perfect frat environment

I recall a (short-lived?) trend a year or two ago of startups offering free beer as a perk, and generally trying to describe themselves like a frathouse.
To be clear, you can sideload to a device without paying, but you still can't use all the features. If you want to make an app that uses App Groups, for example, you have to have a paid account. There's no way to even test it without paying your annual Software Development Tax.
Just curious, went did so many (8000) retailers opt out?
Lodash is helping with JavaScript language additions like

https://github.com/leobalter/object-enumerables

https://github.com/bterlson/proposal-flatMap
I was thinking of overstaying. You make a point, though, regarding non-payment. If I can park for two hours for $4 then presumably I should be able to for 8 hours for $16. We often prevent this, because we underprice parking.
Light concentrating lenses and mirrors have been a thing for a very long time. This article doesn't go into any detail about what makes the globe so special, other than it looks kind of cool.
So difficult to a judge understand what is encryption.
I think the easiest solution would be to just conduct the interview via text only. You could even apply filters to transform some common grammatical structures or word choices with gender cues into a more neutral form.
Caller ID also applies to text messages, right? They have phone numbers on them too.
> By now, HTML and the standards surrounding it have become so big that starting from a blank slate nowadays is next to impossible.

One important mitigating factor is that newer standards often generalize older ones. For example, originally all the list elements had special case handling (and still might in other engines), but now it's possible to do all that with the user agent style sheet with new additions to CSS that generalized these things.

It saves an enormous amount of work to implement the web at a particular point in time as opposed to starting at the beginning and keeping up with the changes until that same point in time. Not only that, but all the failed branches that were already explored mean that a new engine avoids quite a bit of technical debt.

It's still quite hard. Here's a nice example of a layout bug on HN we thought would be simple to fix for the release, but turned ugly fast: https://github.com/servo/servo/issues/11821
It's probably because Google is perceived as giving you something like search, email, maps etc, which is very valuable, and "in exchange" it does stuff that does not directly impact your life. Similarly with Apple, which also works as a status symbol.

The sequence is also important: first they build services and products, sell (or give away) them on their merits, and then turn the analytics to 11. Doing both at the same time is a no-no, but once a user is dragged in, natural laziness and other migration costs kick in.

They are long cons, and to be fair, the products are pretty nice.
secretary of state here I come. I file my $50 for my certificate get my loan and interest deferred put loan payment in savings, sell some shit on ebay, take chunk from savings in 3 years and pay 2/3 of my loan off.
Forgot around 30s :D
Wait, you wear clothes while working remotely? I only put on a shirt for video conferencing.
So we need a fork that runs sans Gapps
The only reason those jobs exist right now is that humans are still much better than robots. Amazon is working on pick/pack robots in the hope of changing that.
"It's a dangerous game they're playing,"

Not for Oracle it isn't.
Build your own open source solar panels
4. Have less people to feed

5. Redistribute food more equally
An open source information treaty might solve the problem. Share info between overlapping projects and GPL the resulting IP, publish in an open journal. Everyone saves money on research and hacking.
Yep.

Here: https://www.codeeval.com/company/EmailCherry/
I think it's only consistent. Static assertions should always always always hold (things like type checks etc), if you really want to only evaluate it in that branch you can still do

if constexpr (foo) {
static_assert(!foo || /* assertion */);
} else {
static_assert(foo || /* assertion */);
}

(this gets ugly fast with lots of else-ifs, but it's a workaround - I don't know why you'd ever need it, though)
So put just a dime in the meter..

(I do recognize the sarcasm, of course)
Really looking forward to auto templates, so annoying to have to specify type signatures in lambdas when most other languages don't require it.
It's almost as if the context matters.

Somebody at night "politely" brandishing a firearm asking you for your wallet on a lonely street is not the same as a guy wearing an american flag t-shirt with a rifle on his back sucking down hot dogs at a cookout, even though they are both "holding" guns.
Yeah. Two aspects of that:

- there's a shit ton of programmers on the market now, with universities producing more and more like sausage factories

- the job market is getting super-specialized - once they'd ask for JavaScript programmers, now they ask exclusively for "Angular experience" or "React experience" or "$random_two_weeks_old_framework experience"; whether demanding such specific skillsets buy companies anything over asking for just a $language programmer is arguable
That's a matter of taste; opinions differ. One perhaps less controversial case for virtual inheritance is in exceptions: see http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_53_0/libs/exception/doc/usin...
Why not just use the PBS Kids app? My daughter adores it.
Classic example of the difference between nation-states and macro-powers btw. Should an individual market, even a rich one like the UK, complain about this and that, Google would shrug. But when it's the whole of the EU talking, they better listen.
I believe this is referring to the ebay password submission that was on the front-page yesterday. The summary was that Ebay seemed to be sending each typed character of the password field back home.
Also the kitten incident sounds like a spur-of-the-moment joke in poor taste, if it even happened. I'm not sure why the author seems to be claiming otherwise. Surely they're well aware of the whole internet / kittens thing?

I'm not saying the tech world is blameless but this sounds like someone with a book to sell.
Both from the same company? Wow.
(1) you're confusing C string and other languages strings (even Swift strings are not the same thing as NSString or C strings). Anyhow, even in C \( is perfectly accepted by compilers

gcc -Wall -x c - <<EOF
#include <stdio.h>
int main(){ printf("\(hi"); }
EOF

So it's perfectly reasonable to write it and not mean interpolation (maybe they meant "\\(", but that's another matter)

(2) A sequence can be sorted without you knowing which elements are inside it, A computation can be known to terminate without you knowing (yet) which value it will yield.

Similarly, you don't need to have internal knowledge of your code to know that you'll be able to rely on RC consistency in the future (otoh I guess that something consistent is not necessarily the same as something predictable)
I mean, I'm charging him with neither - I'm not advocating for his conviction, I'm just a dude commenting on an internet forum. There's much more evidence where that came from, but that statement cuts into the central premise of Serial S1E1 (particularity of the first few minutes), which is why I picked that to start with.

The problem (and the point I'm trying to make) is that there's this sort of "Adnan was convicted by bad evidence" type of myth that the entirety of the Internet seems to believe because that's what a podcast says. In reality, a jury of his peers, after listening to the case in full, decided to convict the guy. Unanimously. I don't know if the guy is guilty or not, but it hits me as a little silly that the entire world has decided that they know better than the jury because we listened to a podcast. There's at least some reason to read that as "Serial didn't provide a totally unbiased story" not "wow, it's good that we are all so much smarter than the people who looked at the evidence in its entirety in the courtroom".
All food including organic has been modified genetically over the thousands/millions of years. What we really need, and the only way to be fair, is to just list everything used for everything. The GED'd idiots who think "organic = no pesticides" will try to read the long list of stuff applied to their food and immediately die, win/win.
Based on this ruling, why wouldn't the suspect's defense now be "well, my computer must have been hacked, it wasn't me downloading the questionable content. See, look, even the courts have ruled that my computer, for all intents and purposes, is publicly available for all kinds of hackers to utilize for nefarious purposes."
How Deep Learning is used in production at Google
I find lodash infinitely useful to this day. It even provides a build with auto-curried, iteratee-first, data-last functions if FP is your jam. Just require it like this:

var _ = require("lodash/fp");
A hundred times this. I couldn't agree more.

GMO is a very vague term, we can engineer plants to make them toxic in which case no, eating GMO would not be OK. We are also most probably able to engineer interesting new kinds of crop that would have a very positive impact on humanity and our natural resource consumption.

There are several issues here that are not addressed by these Nobel Laureates which makes their letter dangerous and irresponsible:

- as of now, Monsanto and co. are engineering their seeds so that it's impossible to keep part of the harvest and use it to grow the next one (as peoples have done for thousands of years), essentially forcing farmers to come back next year and buy new seeds. This is a very efficient way to keep farmers poor and under control. It is also very unethical, but of course the optimal choice economically speaking...

- Monsanto is also engineering seeds to resist RoundUp in order to shove said RoundUp down the throats of farmers. At this point I don't think I need to debate the negative impact of roundup on human beings and nature, it's known well enough. The main point though is that it's important to remember that the goal of these companies is to maximize profit, not benefit the world. Pushing RoundUp like this is a good example: there is no incentive for them to improve the resistance of seeds to diseases as it would bring down sales of their main product.

- GMO is not all good or all bad, but it is complex and a powerful tool, thus requiring caution and thorough TESTING. Testing that GMO lobbies are not exactly diligent to run.

- Speaking of lobbying, most of the problems mentioned in this thread could be solved with a better regulation as they're due to bad actors. they're not intrinsic to GMO. But Monsanto being a very powerful lobby, I'm personally not too confident about the outcome.
And what about Red Hat? They do search Java, Python and Linux people all the time, and even Remote
Rails 5: Add Array#second_to_last and Array#third_to_last Methods
Donald Shoup has pointed out how weird it is we tend to price street parking lower than garage parking, generally because only the latter is run by private business.

Street parking is generally closer to where you want to go, and easy to get in and out of (unless the street is extremely busy - I always hated parking on Wilshire in LA, even when I found a spot). Making it as expensive as it needs to be to ensure at least one spot is available would ensure easy access for those who want to quickly run in to a shop, while a garage can continue to serve people who want multi-hour stays and for whom a few minutes entering and exiting is less dissuading.
bs

http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/05/05/40419855...
<vested interest hat on>

For too long it was considered OK to have a spec with either no tests, or tests that focused on the wrong thing ("is it possible to implement this spec" vs "do implementations behave in compatible ways"). It is still considered too OK for browser vendors to write their own tests for a feature and not share them with the rest of the community. However, pressure from other platforms is changing attitudes here as it becomes increasingly apparent that without a stronger degree of interoperability, developers will vote with their feet and target platforms with fewer bugs to trip over.
Writing a system that (correctly) interprets the zillion flavors of "RSS" out there and presents them with a common API is non-trivial. An 80% solution is pretty easy, and a 90% solution isn't that hard, but a near-100% solution will take you into some very dark and ugly places.

I don't know of any service that does this as well as the Google Feed API did. If someone else does, please share.
You might dig

https://github.com/lodash/lodash/wiki/FP-Guide
It can and has.

http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/05/05/40419855...
This is presumably more money for PBS than they were getting before which means they will have a larger budget for new programming. Also, the content is already free to access for those consumers you are so worried about:

> All of the titles moving to Amazon will still be broadcast on local PBS stations, on PBS’s website and the PBS Kids Video app. Amazon Prime will have the streaming rights to shows approximately six months after their premiere date on PBS stations.
Rubenstein knew about the pun, and confirmed it once Sandberg called him out on it. Seems working with his team, she was able to understand how their minds worked and knew exactly what they had done.
Just go on activity controls and disable "device information":
https://myaccount.google.com/activitycontrols?hl=en&pli=1&ot...
The primary value of boards is a sanity check for the top layer of management. As an investor you want a board looking after the investors interests. You can find plenty of company's that where gutted by overly permissive boards handing out ridiculous compensation packages for example.

PS: You can compare the performance of public companies with various board makeups, it's not a meaningless topic.
It 100% has happened in nature, to everything..

http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2015/05/05/40419855...
Blackphone would fit the bill

[1] https://www.silentcircle.com/products-and-solutions/devices/
wouldn't you rather do that at home? or outside the office, at least? but since you're working 60 or more hours a week, I guess in the office is the only opportunity...
> Are you still considered a full member of the EU, meaning you retain all your rights including voting ?

Yep.

And to your other points, yes again. Article 50 is a political and economic suicide pill.
From the judge's ruling:
"Just as Justice Breyer wrote in concurrence that a police officer who peers through broken blinds does not violate anyone's Fourth Amendment rights, jd. at 103 (Breyer, J., concurring), FBI agents who exploit a vulnerability in an online network do not violate the Fourth Amendment. Just as the area into which the officer in Carter peered - an apartment - usually is afforded Fourth Amendment protection, a computer afforded Fourth Amendment protection in other circumstances is not protected from Government actors who take advantage of an easily broken system to peer into a user's computer"

The keywords are "exploit a vulnerability". In that sense, I'm inclined to agree with the judge.

Put another way, are broken blinds all that different from an unsecured (though attempting to be secured) network?

The counter might be: using an exploit of any kind is akin to first breaking the blinds yourself.
Neat Video 4 Crack and Serial Keygen Full Free Download
constexpr isn't mean to replace the preprocessor. This will not compile for the same reason that

if (false constexpr) { random gibberish }

will not compile, and that's a good thing. I think it would be odd to "hack" static_assert for this special case.
A perfect example of the left being anti-science (in addition to vaccinations), just like the right is on evolution and climate change.
We don't have to wonder, we'll find out what happens in that case, because it seems likely we'll cancel the UK law that tells the UK courts to do that as part of the process of Brexit. Something we can do, because we have sovereignty.
Biggest Hack in Iran’s History, 20M Irancell User Data Exposed
Based on what's shown in the other graph, there are a few cities that are extreme outliers (such as Stone Mountain and Clarkston). Doing an average on such data won't show a trend so much as it will reflect on how much these outliers sway the average.

It's like proving that everybody got rich in a town overnight since the average income shot up while Bill Gates came for a visit.
Are citizens also allowed to hack into government computers as part of this decision?
Networking TS is pretty much based on the Boost Asio library. In fact, there is a non-boost standalone Asio library http://think-async.com/Asio/AsioStandalone that has no dependencies on boost and can just be used as a header-only library.