skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> No function will transfer ownership of N nodes to the new container for O(1) complexity.

No safe function. It is easy to do with unsafe. This has been explained already.

> And a tree. And a graph. Trees / graphs structures and algorithms are everywhere, too bad Rust language designers forgot that.

Rust's designers are mainly from the C++ world. They know this. And we have seen tons of these datastructures crop up that are written in Rust code everywhere.

The idea is that you find a safe abstraction boundary for you low level data structure, and stick to it. For an LRU cache, the boundary is the LRU cache (not the internal linked list, which needs to be accessed using `unsafe`). The stdlib exposes a linked list that can be used standalone, but as part of a larger unsafe datastructure you should copy it out and integrate directly to get finer grained unsafe access.
Angular 2 – Best Practises
You mean the Flash based NIT exploit, as part of Metasploit? Flash which is by default off in TBB and has really nothing to do with tor, is actively discouraged by the tor project, and is in strong decline world over?

Or are the talking about the Carnegie Mellon attack that modifying Tor protocol headers? If so, is that fixed security bug enough to judge tor as failure and only usable for research? Even seatbelt, which has a fairly simple concept, had initial issues and are still being improved.

On the topic of the Carnegie Mellon attack, the tor project both addressed the protocol header bug and changed their security practices. Strange activity in the tor network has in the past been deemed safe until proven harmful, but as a result of having an research university doing attacks on users of the network, that practice has been reversed and strange activity is now deemed harmful until proven safe.
Or put one cheap android phone, and track
Well, Spry is much more Smalltalk than "only use Smalltalk syntax". But I have an entire article being written on that subject :)

And no, your description of how it works in Smalltalk is wrong - #to:do: is implemented in the receiver (1).

In Spry we are calling an infix function named to:do: and the only real difference to Smalltalk in this case is the fact that the dispatch of to:do: is not polymorphic. But as I described in other comments I am working on polymorphic functions as a way to reach similar abstraction levels.
Super-slow circulation allowed oceans to store carbon during last ice age
> Free movement of workers is a prerequisite for access to the single market.

That's what is going to change. That is the primary motive for exit.

Not being able to control your borders is giving up a sovereign right typically by conquered peoples. That's how the British see it and they are probably right in my view.

Thinking otherwise is like believing that other people are able to move into your house without asking but you know, it's 'your' house on paper. That's something only an intellectual of the worse kind could believe.
A Drone Startup Explores Underwater
Exactly, they make it seem like it somehow is society that changed to not have glassblowers anymore but the reality is that it was their simple business decision.

Hiring a rookie glassblower or two at maybe 50.000 a year for 5 years would have cost them perhaps half a million. And now instead of that they're going to have to 'steal' one from another university for god knows how much money and God knows for how long.
Sounds like it. But like you said they're almost all probably first-timers, given the location. It's hard to tell if that completely explains the micromort difference or not.

Also, it is possible that due to those fatalities, the business implemented better safety protocols as a response and may actually be safer now than it was then.

It's my Jack in the Box theory. Back in the 90s there were a couple high profile food poisoning cases (salmonella I think) where customers had died after eating at Jack in the Box. It nearly ruined the company. But my feeling is that the safest time to eat there is a month or so after those events. When all the restaurants would be kicking their food-handling practices into high gear.

So now I eat at Chipotle more often than I did before. Shorter lines and probably the cleanest food. I hope. My "theory" may be bullshit.
> I learned a lot from this tour, and it wasn't just about MAD, or the people who worked there, or how they coped with an absurd world. It was about how to go to places you shouldn't be. That is, if you act like you belong somewhere, people will usually let you in and possibly even do things for you.

A Social Engineering classic, iirc...
No, Spry is not at that point yet. Or at least I sure hope noone is! :)

What you describe (interesting syntax) is a way to declare argument names and Spry doesn't declare them. That's a discussion in itself of course, but right now it doesn't.
How so? If anything, ignoring ZFS's cache subsystem, a filesystem is another module in a pluggable system if many fileystems. DTrace on the other hand to be most effective requires adding probes all over the kernel.
For a moment I thought dreamweaver was making a comeback! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spry_framework
Also, Nim has very promising support for threads, threadpools, async stuff etc etc. And when I rewrite the Spry interpreter to be stackless I hope to be able to use a lot of those things too.
Are you offended by (dots)?
Maybe this book https://books.google.ch/books/about/The_Connection_Machine.h... ?

If i remember correctly it's Hillis' PhD thesis:
http://worrydream.com/refs/Hillis%20-%20The%20Connection%20M...
I understand what you're saying, but I also find it funny that Apple would try to avoid patents. If you're saying that Apple is happy to patent stuff but not so much when it comes to using patents by others, maybe you're right. I wish filesystems were more like media codecs in that Apple had no choice but to support an industry standard.
>Why would EU member states do anything to help a country that is destabilising the entire EU project.

It's not help. It's for the benefit of everyone. The whole point of EU is that it's not zero-sum game.

Britain's negotiation position is weakened, but other EU countries want to get access into British markets just as much as Brits want to get into EU markets.
Blockchain startups changing the world
> I'm not saying that "used" is invalid per se, but rather that it is a perspective that is not justified simply by the fact that Facebook has an advantage from the user.

But are you saying that "user" is a perspective that is justified simply by the fact that the used has an advantage from Facebook?

> In the end probably it all depends on a value judgement:

Of course it does. Everything does. Even whether killing people is bad is ultimately a value judgement.

> But then Stallman should just say plain and loud what he means: that Facebook is useless to the people that spend their time on it.

Why should he? And doesn't he? Did you not understand him that you think he should express himself clearer?
Living here: Which?
Traditional vs. Digital Marketing for Small Businesses in 2016
there are a lot of good glass blowers in the weed industry. I just don't think they would leave their current job. :)
The irony of your comment is glorious. Thank you.
The inside story of Y Combinator's basic income project
This is probably just me but I think when they re-word things they choose the clumsiest and least-sexy possible words to put into the acronyms. Digital Restrictions Management is not only a mouthful, it's also obtuse and why bother when you could have something cool like Digital Rebel Management?

That being said, if your claim is that the acronyms as they existed do not accurately describe what's going on, I fundamentally disagree. What's copy protection? It's technology that protects against copying. Protection and restriction might as well be synonyms. What's DRM? It's technology that helps rights holders manage the rights they have to their intellectual property. What's intellectual property? It's like physical property, but it's ideas instead of objects. Intellectual property is never safe from the fair use exception, which is what protects what one might call the "free flow of ideas" and such. It's simply there to protect exploitation for financial gain.
Clause 28 of the 1998 Act notes at sub-clause 7, in dry terms, with regard to legislative competence that "this section does not affect the power of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to make laws for Scotland." In that single little line is the subordinate nature of devolution. Generally, Westminster will let the Scottish Parliament get on with devolved legislation. Carry on governing. But it is also made clear that Westminster's ultimate sovereignty over the UK, the entire UK, is unaffected.

So in other words, no. The UK Parliament is sovereign over the Scottish one, although by convention they do not usually override it.
It does protect the customer though, at the very least it means their money was well spent and other people can't violate that social contract by taking what they want for free.
You talk of that youth aged 18-24y who voted remain 75%.

Well you should know, that same youth did not show up as well as the other groups did. Less than 40% percent showed up. It's kind of funny, because if this group would've just shown up like the rest, it would've easily been a remain outcome.
Distributed banking: Product vs. Utility
The old rule applies: If the headline ends with a question mark, the answer is "no".
Unpopular opinion it seems, but I agree. Not that it is a bad thing. It would be fun to see statistics of how many people here have at some point in their (probably early) career built their own time tracking/project management app.
It's really too soon to tell.

If UKIPers have it their way, all the way, the atmosphere for foreigners will become poisonous (for an idea about how this might end up being like just watch V for Vendetta or better yet read the graphic novel).

I doubt that, though because even they're not stupid enough to bite the hand that feeds them. However, I said the same thing about the Brexit before.

The world will continue spinning, it just might not revolve around London anymore.
So in finest journalistic tradition, if a headline contains a question then the answer to that question is no.
>The EU is pissed at the UK right now and will not make it easy for them.

There are attempts to anthropomorphize the situation to sell the news. There is no indication whatsoever that this narrative is true.

In the end it's just another negotiation to get things going. Interests and offerings determine the positions. Working together gets UK and EU into where they both want and expands the pie.
It's not as simple as that: they would still need to make the case but you lying at the border just gives US authorities bigger evidence. Couple of years ago a French tourist answered "yes" to make fun of US borders and ended up in jail for a couple of days - not years as obviously he was more a dumb tourist than a real terrorist
How profitable is laying horse races? How about compared to the S&P 500 and hf?
One can wonder whether their remain vote is really wiser if they're not even wise enough to show up.
> That's what is going to change.

It will? Enlighten me, how will this take place?

> That is the primary motive for exit.

No, that was the primary motive for voters to vote for 'exit', unfortunately that is also the one thing that most likely will remain just as it is today.

What will change is that the UK (or England, or whatever will be left of it) will be further marginalized, both on the European and the world stage.

> Not being able to control your borders is giving up a sovereign right typically by conquered peoples. That's how the British see it and they are probably right in my view.

Sad.
It is called "Betteridge's law of headlines"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
My dad was that person at Rice University. A high precision machinist that just had a high school education yet was involved with Nobel Prize winners in their daily work. Great memories hanging out in the research support shop at Rice. When he retired, they did replace him, but the new guy certainly doesn't compare. Scientists at Rice still call him up to consult from time to time.
This is a lot of words to say "technically maybe, but they're not so stupid as to try without a lot of public backing."
Indeed Israel does it, but only for Arabic or Muslim tourists that present certain characteristics - political engagement for instance. So it does exist but it's really not mainstream
I use https://getpapier.com/ chrome plugin, its quite handy and its always on your sight.
Good, then they would again argue and whine that EU is putting them down like they did for the past 10 years. Enough is enough.
Correct. My view is that Scotland CAN veto, but Westminster can override that veto. It creates a brilliant scenario for Scottish politicians, particularly those who seek independence; by vetoing they gain the support of their constituents while kicking the toxic can down the road to Westminster politicians, who should respect the results of the referendum, creating louder calls for a second Scottish referendum.
> Couple of years ago a French tourist answered "yes" to make fun of US borders and ended up in jail for a couple of days - not years as obviously he was more a dumb tourist than a real terrorist

This must have made the USA so much safer.
The UK has a mandate from the people to leave the EU. Attempting to block the brexit over technicalities in Unionist agreements is a weak position for any politician to take. If the SNP believes they can successfully build a new mandate from the Scottish people to leave the UK, that would be a position of strength and they should work with that.
McDonald's was used as an example due to their work at automating their franchises, and their comments about increasing this to full automation due to the $15 minimum wage[0].

The bigger point (and the dirty secret of globalism) is that nobody can really afford labor, especially multinationals.

0. http://www.inquisitr.com/1594675/mcdonalds-counters-minimum-...
Yeah, what do these guys from Intel know about things like caching.
You're right, but I think they could make it very difficult for Westminster if they wanted to. It's not a fight they can legally win, but it could still be in their interests to fight it anyway.

There's a joke going around here in London that we should devolve with them forming Scotlondon and set up immigration controls at M25 junctions. It's becoming pretty clear that a lot of exit voters never imagined it could actually happen and are suffering buyer's remorse.
Exactly this. The US educational obsession with "everyone should go to college" has led to both inflated college costs as wel as a perceived lower respect for the trades. Asking a "marketing specialist" to hang a simple sheet of drywall would be like asking a giraffe to make coffee.
I find it really problematic: when you fill the US borders paperwork, you are supposed to give objective admin/personal details while on social media you are supposed to speak up your mind. Where do you place the limit between somebody that publicly criticizes the US foreign policy and somebody that can be a threat? How are they going to handle people who posted something like "The US knew about the 9/11 attacks"?
Now that Spanish elections are settled and the current government will likely keep in power, it would be a master move to ease the legal / bureaucratic / tax side of starting a business in Spain and attract some investments fleeing from the current uncertainty because the whole Brexit situation.

Talent is still very high in Barcelona, as the city's attractiveness is not restricted to job opportunities and salaries: Weather, food, international connections, cost of living, location in mainland Europe, the Mediterranean, culture, sports, Pyreness at 2hr drive if you prefer skiing, lots of mountains closer to hike, excellent and cheap public transport network, fast trains to Madrid and Paris, ... What's not to love? :)

Of course this is not going to happen as the government is corrupt and has little interest on boosting startups. Their idea of business is siphoning people's money through utility bills (all presidents have / had ultimately become chairmen of different utility companies) and bank commissions.
Makes me think of http://futhark-lang.org/ in terms of semantics.
No. Sturgeon is just playing up to her base.

Scotland is effectively a one party system, which is quite dangerous, never mind that the common man/woman do not see this.

The consequences for leaving the UK are well known. Companies aren't going to stay in because of Europe. They are going to move over the border.

Also. The UK rescued the Scottish banks. Scotland will have to take on half this debt. Will the EU bail out Scotland? Will there be Greece style terms?

So with the debt, companies leaving, not getting much tax receipts. How will Scotland pay for the FREE tuition, FREE healthcare, FREE this and FREE that, they like to promise? Is the EU going to be sending them FREE monies?

Finally and this is where I tend to laugh the most. Once Scotland joins Europe and the Euro. How is Scotland an independent state in Europe? How have Scottish people not realised this? Go look at Greece!

Scotland won't be able to control her economy. The EU bureaucrats will not do what's in her best interests. They'll do what's in THEIR best interests!

So what happens when Scotland no longer has control of her finances, can't pay for the FREE stuff. Oh and then slips into recession and the UK is doing better off? Yeah, that's the joke.

Oh and the UK won't let Scotland use the pound. I can tell you that now!
They can only veto it if the legislation comes before the Scottish parliament for review, and it won't. What they can do is pass resolutions in Scottish law incompatible with Brexit that Westminster will have to repeal or get struck down in the courts.
Politics is a game of chess - the suggestion of blocking Brexit is a tactic that the SNP can use to help get a second referendum on their terms.
According to Wikipedia, the United States restarted production of Plutonium-238 at circa 1.5 kg a year in 2013 after a c. 25-year hiatus.
Most plumbers and electricians I know make a lot more money than the infinite number of "social media specialists" or "copywriters" I know. The problem isn't risk, it's perception of self-worth. Many millennial-types view the trades as beneth them (as they pour coffee at Starbucks waiting for some value to be realized from their worthless gender-studies degree.)
I think the position is: technically no, practically almost certainly no, but politically it might be a sensible move for the SNP to strengthen support from Scottish voters.
They don't need to but more often than not they do if the legal argument holds any merit at all. And this is not the first time a court has argued that way creating a substantial risk that the next time the decision will be similiar.
Well away from leaking sounds in to the room that the recording is done in. Even desks can have fans in though and they need to be in the same room as the operator.
I will be there later today! Very excited. I will post some photos here if I have a chance.
Here's an article with a few more details on the construction: http://www.wired.com/2016/06/heres-christo-built-huge-17m-fl...
I think this is a rather bad headline because it is effectively a clickbait, i.e. you won't know the answer until you click on the title and read the article.

Headline should summarize the main points in the news article as a statement, rather than posing a question to the reader.
About the only thing that might stop the UK leaving now would be for the new conservative leader to call a snap general election, thinking that labour are in serious disarray. Then labour campaign on not leaving the EU, and together with the SNP, win. The new labour/SNP government would be able to claim a mandate from the electorate to not leave.

I don't think it's going to happen though.
"the UK won't let Scotland use the pound" was an extremely effective argument that probably won the last referendum.

But you're going to need a new one: the euro just became a lot more credible than the pound as a currency for Scotland.
Beautiful Circular Seekbar library for android inspired by analog clock
Any outcome other than UK leaving the EU would go against democratically elected decision, in essence suspending democracy.
Moving to OSS by Default
The referendum was non-binding. While a majority of those who voted said leave, the role of the government is to do what's best for their country and their people, and that's not always going to correspond to what a majority says should be done.
You can usually tell the images apart if you have some resolution to play with. Taking such pictures in sufficient quality takes some skill (e.g. with regards to lighting) that two different photographers usually end up with two different picture of the same painting.

And even if you can't tell those two images apart you can often trace the image back to its origin.
PS4 Neo Leak: GPU 2X Powerful with High Clock Speed, 5.5TF, Priced $499 and More
Cache coherence has already scaled a lot further than I expected it to. I take him to mean that, while it has scaled remarkably far already, it won't scale forever and we are starting to push the limits on it.
How to get out of this mess: quit with this government, call for new elections. Then you make it an election subject: will we follow the referendum or not?! The referendum is advisory, not legally binding. So they can ignore it. If the new elections are clear and people vote 55% to stay in - it's a clear cut case.
There's a lot of clutching at straws going on at the moment. People coming out with political or legal theories, trying to interpret David Cameron's failure to immediately declare leaving under article 50 as kicking the whole issue into the long grass etc etc.

This is the latest, like others it's more of an exercise in denial than it is in reality. Many of these things could come to pass, it's true, but each one carries with it the implication that a direct democratic mandate, to leave the EU, is ignored.

If this occurs we can expect politics in the UK to become dangerously divided and unsettled, and the likes of UKIP to become a seriously large party in the next parliament, not to mention civil unrest in various forms.

The people that voted leave already feel left behind and ignored by the state. Explicitly ignoring them and finding a way to work around their democratically expressed opinion is likely to be a really BAD idea.

--edit-- I notice the points attached to this post going up and down. To those downvoting, can you tell me where/why you disagree?
I feel it is usually assumed somewhat nonchalantly that the Scots could split off as an independent nation. One signal of the Brexit vote is that nationalists (or empireists) will be represented stronger in future elections. I can see a (neo-imperialistic) future where it is in the interest of England to not let anyone split off and fight for that with all means. I think the hardline will be Northern Ireland but strategically speaking it would make sense to not allow precedent and keep Scotland in.
Yeah, definitely only give them the account you've groomed to have the highest Sesame credit score.
Found a few of my old stack just last week. Left it out for the kids. They are enjoying them. :)
It's more "does Scotland offer a face-saving way out of triggering Article 50 and exiting the EU". The answer to that may be yes.
Barclays and RBS shares suspended from trading