skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yeah, but lower-class wages especially are pretty flexible. This is especially true with temporary workers, and contract ones. In the end, it'll just mean less people get higher-paying jobs. This won't really matter anyways, because importing goods is always possible, especially when their production is relatively simple. You might then say we could work out some trade agreement such that outsourcing is more difficult, but if you also intend to "give the working class a raise," that'll just make everything more expensive. Couple this with the lower rate of employment as a result of those higher wages, and you just reduced the purchasing power of like, a lot of people.

I think the only clear solution is a basic income, but the political system isn't built for good solutions. Trade relations are becoming more and more important as more of the world develops, which means the traditional working class in developed nations is going to get kind of shafted over the next few decades. It sucks, but much like the whole guilded age, people will eventually learn to do something else.
stream_buffer_init() calls malloc directly, so it's not protected by safe_malloc(). (Unless there is some funky re-define stuff I didn't see).

%x takes unsigned int, not a char. (Although I guess you could just rely on promotion here if you can rely on the unsignedness of char).

> Could you point out a line that is prone to integer overflows?

Never said that it was an overflow (just C&P that comment from the file). Just said its invalid use. Which I'm totally willing to agree on the compiler mostly getting correct behavior. Just not really something I'd want to see landing in something that we all need a really good, secure implementation of.

Best of luck though, I hope you iterate on this to the point we can have a really good DNS implementation in C, in user-space, with optional async processing.
>It's free movement of labour between EU member states

I am certain that even the most compassionate proponent of diversity would find it difficult to call the tens of thousands (?) of individuals from Roma populations in for example Romania and Bulgaria who have arrived throughout West and Northern Europe the past couple of years in any way, shape or form, "labour" ("homeless" is more accurate). I don't blame these people; I blame the governments of Romania and Bulgaria who abandoned these people, thought of them as a "problem" and decided to punt that "problem" over to other member states.
My point in saying this is to say that not everyone believes in casual sex. I am a living counter example. What you think about what promiscuity means does not contradict that.

Since I do not want ambiguity in my description of my non-existent sex life, I will say that I use the medical definition of sex. That means any contact with gentialia is sex and that is what I thought I was saying when I said promiscuous.
Call it `morc`.
You don't need to, but the EU is that way.

We don't even know what is going to happen in the real world, that's difficult to make projection in a hypothetical world were the EU was built differently.

For example, would the UK have voted out in the first place in such a world ? Would Turkey be a member of the EU ?

Edit: Let's add a bit more info. The goal of the EU was to become the USA of Europe. Can each State of the USA determine its own immigration rule directly with foreign nations ?
> In the US, the average person has grievances, is made fun of constantly on TV, and watches as people argue solutions that don't seem to have anything to do with the problem but sure fit their "let no crisis go to waste" mentality. Religious people are always portrayed as secretly corrupt or idiots[2]. Your jobs can get shipped off, replaced by someone on a visa, or a robot will do them. Celebrities are constantly shown knowing more about your job than you and calling you stupid or a villain.

I'm not from the US but I find this surprising. My experience is that politics and the media tell the people what the people want to hear which most of the time are simple solutions to complex problems. Most of the time the problems are someone else's fault, of course. So, yes, people have been deceived but the solution is not yet another vote for absurd reasons. BTW, tomorrow we have (again) elections in Spain. Whatever the result the discussion has already left me dissapointed.
Of course the selection of data is arbitrary -- but Rich gives us a definition, which he makes abundantly clear and uses consistently. All definitions can be considered arbitrary. He's not making any claim that we have all the relevant bits of data or that we can be sure what the data really means or represents.

But we can expound on this problem in general. In any experiment where we gather data, how can we be sure we have collected a sufficient quantity to justify conclusions (and even if we are using statistical methods that our underlying assumptions are indeed consistent with reality) and that we have accrued all the necessary components? What you're really getting at is an __epistemological__ problem.

My school of thought is that the only way to proceed is to do our best with the data we have. We'll make mistakes, but that's better than the alternative (not extrapolating on data at all.)
I'm disappointed that telegram wasn't on this list!

I'm curious about signal but their with service just seems to hang for me.
IAmNotA lawyer and this is not legal advice:

1. OP has closed this AMA and will not be replying.

2. OP specifically stated that he would answer questions only on immigration in general and would not comment or provide legal advice of specific cases, which is exactly what you are asking for. No reputable attorney will do this for randoms on the Internet. Not only is it a liability issue, but rules on ethics, attorney-client relationship, and practice out-of-state prevent this.

3. If you are this successful, you should privately consult with an attorney who can answer all your questions and represent you in your application to USCIS.
Ah ok I'm not necessarily so much interested in using it, but have been looking into the details of the signal ratchet recently, and was wondering what the specific changes / rationale..
For anyone else coming across this thread in the future, here is a bit more information on this issue, excerpted from "How to Hack Apple EFI" https://ghostlyhaks.com/blog/blog/hacking/18-apple-efi-bypas...

> NOTE: If you have a 2010 model MBP or earlier all you have to do is change the amount of RAM in your MBP and clear the PRAM. This is all you have to do to get past OS lock. But you will still have a firmware lock as far as I know as in many cases this has happened. There have been occasions where the firmware lock has also been removed but I cannot contest to any exact models. Remember to set the Mac up like new and register the Mac with a new iCloud account to avoid any future lock-downs.

> Option A: You can assume that a firmware lock was never set and brute force the firmware lock with a HID device such as a Teensy. This operation can take quite a while because it has to go through 10,000 iterations of possible pass-phrases in the worst case scenario. This will ONLY work if it was set by the iCloud!

> Option B: You can assume that a firmware lock was indeed implicated when the MBP was set up and that the brute force method will not work. This can save you time but requires you to have a SPI programmer at hand such as the Bus Pirate or in this case a Raspberry Pi.
> Long before this referendum, they sold copies by demonising immigrants and the EU, through hysterical, mendacious reporting. For decades, they have poured lies and poison into the hearts of a huge swathe of the British electorate.

If only British electorate. I'm Polish, and a lot of people here that I know personally are anti-EU - and quite a lot of their anti-EU arguments are about evil bureaucracy that straightens bananas, reclassifies marine animals and otherwise keeps inventing ridiculous rules. And each time I tried to verify those claims I always ended up tracing the source to a British newspaper that took a perfectly reasonable and sane regulation and mispresented it, or even lied about it. If this is indeed the source of those stories, then British press has fucked over many more people than just their own electorate.
Nitpicking back, xenophobia is intense or irrational dislike or fear of people from other countries or of that which is perceived as foreign or strange. His use of the word is correct, your nitpick is not. It is still xenophobic even whey they're not unknown.
> but the Alto would need to send the pixels a column at a time rather than a row at a time. That would be tricky to do

Couldn't the buffer just be column-major?
The only real way to know if you had a single atom tip was to image a known surface. If the image was junk you probably had some funky tip states going on. HOPG (graphite) was the standard we typically used.

A good tip could be just about anything, from a nice cone to really jagged. One problem was any of the methods one has to view the tip can't actually resolve the single atom that is doing the imaging.
I'm asking because I have the same question, just on a smaller scale.

Is it more than a matter of just repeating what you did to get your first 1K customers? Because it seems like you're killing it, already, to get to 1000. I'd LOVE to be in that situation, but it's a different model of business.

It'd be interesting to hear how you got from 0 to 1000. In any case, best of luck. :)
Connecting incredibly difficult to understand scientific achievements with the simple notion of the common human desire for play and creativity is truly glorious.

A beautiful symbol of prowess, intelligence, creativity and humanity. I don't think anyone should underestimate the impact that a video like that can have on a child (or even a curious adult!)
The person you are responding to means to say that they are unhappy with being called on sexist/racist behavior and can't we just go back to the good old days where white male dominance was the cultural norm?
Well, I know how to make a grenade, and I know how to make a rocket. I guess it's not that bad to know how to combine those things.
Probably not.

https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/746820394217259008?...

>Vote split // On the #EUref result (Remain / Leave):

Happy: 4% / 92%

Unhappy: 88% / 1%

Indifferent: 7% / 5%

(via ComRes)
5 WordPress Plugins for the Ramadan Season – Onenaija Blog
Minergate майнинг эфириума и monero на виде
> I never thought the left would be the ones censoring and controlling speech.

The old Soviet Union was infamous for pervasive censorship.
If you think cutting immigration is the answer to excess in the labor supply, I am afraid you are going to be disappointed. Automation, globalization are much more influential.
I hope that you're really happy of the outcome of your vote.
You destroyed uk and global economy, even if you still Don't realise it.
A nation with narrow minded people that cannot understand the simple consequences of their actions will not have the most happy outcome.
There are a few approaches. Basic guaranteed income approaches are popular on HN. Vouchers (like special use debit cards) could work, too.
At this point why not jabber?
Just a thought experiment. Imagine a world, where everyone can move anywhere in the world. What do you think it would happen ? Don't you think, that people in less prosperous countries would move to more richer countries. And what would that lead to, do you think people from richer countries wouldn't feel the hard impact on their economy ?

My point is this. In the USA, there are less cultural and economic differences between the states, so there won't be as many mass immigrations from one state to another. Now think about if USA decided over night, that it would open it's southern borders to all of South America, I think we all know what would happen.

And the same thing could happen in EU, because you get to huge cultural and economic differences on the borders of EU. Just think about Turkey and negotiations (their demands) to become part of EU. That would be a total disaster.

What good is EU or USA, if it can't keep ILLEGAL immigrants away ?
Isn't the thinking behind that is that unskilled labour will be discouraged/prohibited? Unskilled Brits being displaced by cheaper labour from eastern Europe is usually cited as a reason for dissatisfaction with the EU.
>You can say you support free speech and ban free speech you don’t like. What?

Actually most countries that have free speech do actually ban certain things that fall under hate speech laws.

Some of the things in the parent comment aren't hate speech. However I think it's certainly possible for a company or government to decide between what should be allowed or not allowed, and to do that in a way that isn't morally objectionable.

Your argument seems to be something along the lines that companies and governments cannot possibly censor free speech in a morally acceptable way. It's a slippery slope argument: "ban ISIS and you'll eventually ban Trump supporters" (that seems to be jimmywanger's argument).
This is true, but what are they going to do to me? The threat is not clear to me.
Good luck getting a Trump supporter to respond with consistency when you can't even get those kind of answers from the candidate. Whatever he said a week ago has no bearing on what he will say next week.
> Are you going to sit there with a straight face and claim that Donald Trump is not racist or sexist?

Scott Adams has some interesting commentary on this:

http://blog.dilbert.com/post/146157026376/how-to-un-hypnotiz...
If I had the time, I'd do a thorough analysis of the two and publish my findings.
It is a nice video.

Also be sure to check out IBM's STM gallery for some more amazing images.

http://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_group.php?i...
That is why asking is always a good idea. I've met entrepreneurs that have the mindset that everything has to be an idea of themselves. I think that ego is a big player on their mindset.

The great thing about open-source is that everything is created through collaborarion. The best of everyone is contributed to a project in benefit of the entire community.
> Consider this. I am a physician, a Harvard trained cardiac anesthesiologist. I was born in Soviet Union, and I traveled all over the world. I consider myself to be well read and fairly well educated. And yet when I air my conservative views they are labeled dumb and not intelligent. How's that possible?

It's possible because you being smart in one area of your life doesn't automatically translate to you being smart in your political views. It's entirely possible to be a smart doctor and be dumb and unintelligent on political matters. Maybe your "conservatives views" are dumb, that's a distinct realistic possibility, no matter how good a doctor you are.
"Trump has never mentioned race beyond pointing how how many African-Americans and Latinos support him. Ask your anti-Trumper to offer evidence otherwise. Then point out…"

Do people actually buy this absolute bullshit? Just unbelievable. Good one. I guess he hasn't called migrants from Mexico rapists? I guess his discussion of the judge's race and nationality wasn't racist either? yeah?

And yes, separating out his xenophobia and religious discrimination against Muslims is much better than lumping that in with his other racist speech. Now I'm dying to support him.

His fellow GOPers are calling him a racist and yet somehow I'm expected to just ignore reality? Scott Adams is really a piece of work in this blog post of mental gymnastics. The little pity party he throws for himself at the bottom is a nice touch. God forbid someone hold those voting for fascists accountable. It's almost like minorities and LGBT folk have more at stake or something.
"used a maximal-length LFSR for the program counter."

I found Wikipedia entry on MLS-LFSR. How do those end up useful in program counters?

"you may want to look into bit-serial techniques"

You talking about the 1-bit ALU's like these?

https://www.cs.umd.edu/class/sum2003/cmsc311/Notes/Comb/oneb...

Making a comeback in another field:

http://www.caesjournals.org/uploads/IJCAES-CSE-2012-132.pdf
> Here was a democratically conducted vote for which >50% of a population voted "Leave".

50% of those who voted, not of the population. The turnout was ~70%; of that ~51% voted to leave.

So for every 10 eligible voters, 7 bothered to turn up. Of those seven 3.5 voted to leave; 35% of the electorate voted leave unless my maths and assumptions are incorrect.
As others have noted, the issue is that so many political terms are relative (e.g., the way 'terrorist' is applied to Middle-Easterners far more swiftly and casually than Americans who are equally violent for very similar reasons.)

An organization doing what Google and Facebook are doing must therefore (a) clearly articulate the position on which their judgments are based (b) openly assert that their position is fundamentally superior and preferable to the moral order that accepts the practices that are being suppressed (c) provide a open and defensible argument for selecting one set of values while forcefully rejecting another and (d) be willing to modify this position in the event that fatal contradictions appear, or excessively negative consequences result.

In short, these platforms must not just govern, but do so from a well-considered and articulated philosophy of liberal governance.

Fortunately, they need not start from scratch. There is an abundance of data to support the idea that nations that have broadly inclusive economies with widely and equitably representative policy making bodies are the most prosperous, stable, and desirable places to live. (For details, see "Why Nations Fail" by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson https://www.amazon.com/Why-Nations-Fail-Origins-Prosperity/d...)

By adopting for themselves the governing principles that underpin the most successful societies, Internet platforms can become greater forces for good. At the same time this empirically grounded approach will better shield them from maliciously self-serving people who want to see political and economic power concentrated in the kinds of small and closed sets of hands (specifically, theirs).

As any number of examples from Egypt to Russia to Venezuela to Zimbabwe have shown, those who dominate closed economies and the political systems that reinforce each other invariably make life a living hell for everyone. To the extent that these systems are maintained by way of retrograde social norms, any platform committed to a more open, just society should have no qualms about disarming those who view civil society as anathema.
If brexit was a vote anti-globalism and being nationalist, then the voters are in for a big surprise.

Vote leave have been explicit in about being globalist.
Thank you for pointing this out.
This file actually contained some unused code that was not supposed to make it into the repository so I just removed it.
The "%x" format specifiers were located in debug comments that have been commented out. They have also been removed now.
This:

>>> Amongst people who have utterly given up on the future, political movements don’t need to promise any desirable and realistic change. If anything, they are more comforting and trustworthy if predicated on the notion that the future is beyond rescue, for that chimes more closely with people’s private experiences.

I talk to too many people who have given up yet, for some horrible reason, they still want to vote. They vote to make their assumptions reality. The problem is that giving up is too easy. It plays into the hands of a great many interest groups.

The climate is dead, so why bother trying? Let me drive my lead-powered car for my last few years. The economy is going to tank no matter what we do, so let's take a payday loan and head to Vegas.

Those of us with more than a decades or two left on this earth must force such people to come to terms. The world is going to keep on turning. Rather than wax nostalgic for a past that never really was a thing, we choose to actually try to fix things today. If that means ignoring calls for a return to glory days, so be it.
http://www.pewresearch.org/daily-number/casual-sex-among-the...

"75%

That’s the number of Gen Next Americans (18-25 year olds) who say today’s youth are more likely to have casual sex than were young people 20 years ago. Only 7% of Nexters say their generation has less casual sex and 17% say they have about the same amount. Gen Nexters offer some other fairly harsh assessments about how their behavior and lifestyle compare with the generation that preceded them."
Uploading Files to Server with No Cpanel
The border control person comes off terrifyingly creepy. Perhaps because of the lack of eyes, neutral expression and minimal movement.
I think that the name is not a problem but it's great to receive suggestions since a good idea could be suggested by someone from the community. Thanks for your comment!
Price Hipster, a product search engine and price watching website
> In C++ we have sophisticated debuggers

What features do you look for in a sophisticated debugger? There's upstream support for Rust in GDB (https://np.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/4merw3/gdb_now_support...), I've seen people do reverse debugging with rr (http://huonw.github.io/blog/2015/10/rreverse-debugging/) as well as Valgrind, and the compiler knows how to emit debuginfo, and so should work with any tool that can read DWARF (like LLDB). Mozilla is investing even more into dedicated IDE support this year and the next.

> the rust’s standard library doesn’t expose unsafe API

What unsafe APIs would you like to see? Using Vec as an example, I see a function for constructing a Vec out of raw data (http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.from...), a function for mucking around with the private length field (http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.set_...), a function for receiving a raw pointer to the underlying buffer (http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.as_m...)... we're far from opposed to adding low-level APIs for complete control over collections, all you need to do is ask for them and tell us why they'd be useful. :)

> A single bounds checking feature

I'm not sure what this is asking for. All Rust containers are bounds-checked by default.
I've thought a little bit about this as a physicist. Given that the numbers we really need for science are countable and they are dense in the real numbers, why don't people imagine how math would look like restricted to this set?

My best example: epsilon delta proofs...well, usually when I run physics simulations, I have an explicit error I can't overcome, so I don't really need to know whether a limit converges for all epsilon, just some larger than the largest error in my problem.
You are free to create your own subreddit, with your own moderation rules, with the exception of not brigading which seems very reasonable. There is no longer any central community on reddit (since /r/reddit.com was made inactive), speaking as if reddit is one voice is very strange to me.
Locality of changes is important too.

I've seen a project structured non-ideally for the technical task, but that enabled users to quickly find and understand the part of the project that would fix their problem.

It ended up being like the pyramids, constructed with thousands of labourers. But very successful - effective and popular.

So perhaps ideal contributor structuring is more important than ideal technical structuring...
So, I only have to take apart one single CPU to destroy the whole concept?
This is too close to reality. With the recent breakdown of EU-US safe harbour, and its subsequent reformation under "privacy shield", plus brexit, we may soon have the need for a script to automatically detect, block and seek user confirmation before fetching offshore links.
WordPress Newbs] Start Creating Custom Ultra Fast Themes by Following This Guide