skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I disagree on your logic that discredit articles not published in high ranked peer review journals. First this assume that peer review is unbiased which is wrong. There are subjects that will be rejected because they are simply too controversial and present a risk for the credibility of the journal. This is totally independent on the scientific validity, value and pertinence of the article content.

Some articles may be rejected or strongly frowned upon by referee just because the author has also published on controversial topics like UFOs while the submitted article is not addressing a controversial subject. Again this is to protect the credibility of the journal.

Finally, the fact that the author is known or not also strongly influence the referee's criticism. An author which is known through conferences and communication exchange is more likely to be trusted on the seriousness and validity of his work. A submission of a much less known author will be examined with circonspection and strong criticism, against just as a protection measure.

You don't take in account those bias while what should really matter is the scientific validity of the content. If you don't have the compentence to judge the content, then your red flag raising has nothing to do with science. It's just gossip.
I agree that would be a good sign but it's hard to support the claim there was no enemy at hand with a heavily militarized USSR almost next door
Union Square Ventures Is Really F’n Good
>Free movement of goods and people are inseparable.

Only when talking about people as goods, i.e. as human resources. When talking about people as humans, the borders inside EU are closed real quick when there's a G8 summit et.al. and politicians want to keep protestors from other countries out.
> The latter is where all those DCs are.

Ah, I thought some of them were North of the border. Foresight at work!
The primary difference between the States and the EU is that the federal government is checked by the power of the state governments. The EU has no such check.
SNP jump on Brexit vote
I don't know where you're from, but here in Germany we generally try to avoid sacrificing people (both literally and figuratively).
Minor discussions did once occur.. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/wilson-wanted-uk-to-be-us-...
What is the reason for moving banking to Frankfurt? Is there regulatory issues?

People do not just moving businesses for purely political reasons, there has to be concrete economic reasons.

I actually think that the UK may be less regulated than EU exchanges and that may stay in order to keep the UK more attractive.

If you do not list any real economic reasons, I think this is just scare talk.
> *That is a clear vote against a Europe that is not about democracy or peace, but solely about trade regulations and the interests of big corporations.

Agreed - but I don't believe it will affect the influence of corporations on Brits very much. They have a stranglehold on the UK government just as much as on the EU and a smaller entity is probably easier to influence.

The Brexit would be good for the EU, at least for those who want a centralized, more united, less diversified EU and have been complaining about disagreement on major policies, where GB has often had a controversial position.
That's a very strange, and in some cases inaccurate, portrayal of history.

* The British were not an external enemy. That would have been the French. For the most part, even the people leading the revolution were proud of being British subjects and would have liked to remain so, but could no longer tolerate the conditions being attached to that status. Our enemy was recognized to be our own cousins, not some external force.

* The shared dream of settling the continent was real but - given that said continent was already occupied and settling it meant exterminating the current residents - it's not something I'd want to put forward as key to our identity.

* Shared culture, language, religion? Language, mostly. The Puritans in New England didn't really have much to say to the Quakers in Philadelphia, and both had even less in common with the not-particularly-religious folks down in Virginia. Yes, I guess they all were (or at least professed to be) Christians, but that's not too different than Europe today.

So, basically, the difference between the US and the EU, according to the criteria you've mentioned, is that the US united to commit genocide and the EU united to avoid it. Congratulations on making the point that the two cases are different.
Simply describing the arguments you disagree with as false and people who listen as idiots is why Remain has lost the referendum.

Are you going to learn from that and change your ways?

There was lots of flatly false and misleading crap coming from the Remain camp as well. Just look at how Cameron see-sawed on the consequences of an exit. Before his negotiation it was "things will be OK even if we leave, the economy is fundamentally strong". Then it was chaos, doom, "economic self harm", permanently worse off etc. Now the vote went against him it's back to "everything will be fine".

When the leader of the campaign can't even stay consistent on such a basic thing, that campaign cannot claim a monopoly on truth.
Brexit is Baby Boomers’ ultimate betrayal
The UK government is continuous from at least 1688 and arguably earlier.
HTTP is closer to RPC. You always know the address of the routine to call, so it's not actually a message (except in HATEOAS, in which you first need to learn the next address from last API call).

Closest analogy is the message queue (e.g. ESB) like Active MQ or Rabbit MQ (and the whole JMS tech), in which you do actually send a message and infrastructure does actually figure out who will receive and process it.
I wasn't. India is country of more than a billion low-income people and a poor education system. It's not their fault that they aren't great communicators.
About 85 years after the U.S started, the south wanted to leave and that led to the most deadly war in U.S history.
Both scenarios might be possible, but how did you gain the certainty that both possibilities were equal?
Mitochondrial endonuclease mediates breakdown of paternal mitochondria
Those aren't the two axis political compass uses. The axis they use are equality (left vs right) and liberty (authoritarian vs libertarian). This still faces the same issue where many people are authoritarian about some things and libertarian about others, such as social questions vs financial questions.
Brexit: Britain voted to leave EU
I was talking about programming languages.

Obviously, message passing is alive and well for network protocols.
Why? There is no EU based military coordination. Trade war EU, shooting war NATO. Balance of power games like missile shields in border states are in NATO's purview.
Author here, thanks for your comment.

I think left-to-right works in this case because my target audience is the everyman, not only technical or highly-educated folks. In my experience, people care mostly about the meaning of the information and don't care much about graphs or data in themselves. In that sense, I think of this kind of graph as more of a word or a sentence than a traditional graph, and mostly we read words left-to-right.
Hardly a point, I've had GMaps do the same thing to me in India and the US and Apple found the place just fine. If we were comparing GMaps of 4-5 years then yes, it was far and away better, but now it seems to hae regressed and Apple maps has caught up for most use cases
How long does it take to find a job as a developer in the US compared to Europe?
The US did a free trade agreement with my country, Chile. I doubt they find the UK not important enough to try to make a deal.
At a guess, they do. And democracy with 'simple majority required for huge changes' may not be the best recipe to get buy-in from those that are dragged along.

So I fully understand the anger, if it weren't for the recent Scottish referendum that would be a different situation, but that did happen and for the Scots this must be extremely bitter right now.
Wanting benefits and not wanting harm is pretty common.
Show HN: Min, the world's fastest CSS framework
The US independance was completely inspired by the "Lumières" (the philosophical movement of the Enlighteners), which originated in France and led to the French revolution as well as the emergence of true democracy accross Europe. So even if the US was already independant by the time the French Revolution happened, this is only because it was way more complicated to achieve the latter. But let's not be mistaken about its origins.
that very is disrespectful to people who lived through it...
If they're doing this in stages I'm sort of surprised they're going east instead of "west with the night" or rather day. If you choose when you start a journey you can better maximize the ratio of day to night. Of course, the tradeoff is that both are longer which increases your need for batteries, so maybe that's more important. Especially cross the Pacific, I guess, where they had to travel for much longer.
Basically, the two parses are different. One is "being <capable of>" something, as in "I didn't think he was capable of murder", i.e. "I didn't believe he could commit murder". The second parse is "being capable <at something", as in "be skilled <at something>". "I didn't think he was capable at murder" sounds weird and would mean "I didn't think he was very good at killing people", but you'd use it in something like "he was capable at math".

The "patronizing" part was because "this is for people who are capable of German" sounds more condescending to me than "this is for people who can read German".
I'm not saying Remain didn't peddle crap (or even implied that only Leave was doing so). The two issues I've highlighted are demonstrably false. The whole campaign descended into the worst kind of politics on both sides.
While I feel like voting to leave is the wrong step here, and will undoubtedly lead to some problems in the immediate future, I do find some truth in your post. The unity of the EU has always felt ethereal to me. It has never felt like the EU was one entity. I'm hoping that this sparks a movement toward something that IS more unified, and more representative of the needs of the individual member states. Even if the EU dissolves entirely, perhaps this will mean adoption of common treaties and policies that are drafted during the preparation of the UK to leave.
Repeating globalist lies in a one sided slander against the majority of the people is not going to help your cause.
> As a British citizen, I'm appalled by the sentiment expressed here. It flies in the face of the ideas and values upon which the EU was founded. I'm not going to say anything beyond that.

This is basically a divorce -- and those things generally are filled with hurt feelings, lashing out, clearly competing interests and a scramble for the valuable assets. It is likely going to be more problematic on the weaker party (the UK) than it is on the stronger party (the EU.)
The test was which browser gives you the better battery life while browsing the internet like a normal user.

Why is a different question and it's not that relevant, I often don't care why something I USE works better I just care that it does.

If it something I BUILD then I would care much more but again this is a whole different issue.
I recall having very heated disagreements with a friend years ago; she believed Ireland would unite in our lifetime, I believed the idea itself was too young for anyone to take seriously. Maybe this is the catalyst needed to advance the conversation.

A United Ireland in our lifetime would be heart-explodingly amazing; however just as the UK voted Leave, Northern Ireland could well vote Stay.
>> "NI won't leave as it might start another civil war."

I think the complete opposite. This gives NI a real debate on independence. We now all face issues bigger than the usual partisan/sectarian nonsense. Border controls will effect a lot of people. That coupled with the many other problems could potentially lead to people putting their usual differences to one side as there are bigger fish to fry. And stop with the 'civil war' hyperbole. We are past that.
French Revolution or Emperor Napoleon & the Napoleonic Code? Italy was hugely influenced by the latter, as I am sure you know.
I wonder how it compares with Handmade Hero https://handmadehero.org/
I was an early supporter (bought the book in pre-release), but the lack of explicit licensing info on the engine and assets has cooled my interest. Hope this gets addressed.
What if I was to tell you that the "n+1 query problem" only happens when you misuse ORMs? I know, "no true scotsman" and all that :)

Ok... what if I was to tell you that you can get SQL injection with stored procedures? I worked for a company where we had that problem. I hadn't written them, but I knew that was impossible so I bet my boss that's not the reason.

And then I looked at them and discovered they were doing something like

s = "SELECT * FROM table WHERE id =" + @id

and then

exec_sql s

(I don't remember the exact syntax, but it was something like that.)

Misuse of what a stored procedure is supposed to do? Yeah, so's the "n+1 query problem" with ORMs... Though I will grant you that the second one is much easier to get wrong, the guy who wrote the SP had to work to make it vulnerable to injection...
Freedom of movement seemed like the main issue, well "immigrants" really. It could also be a problem for people voting to remain. Indeed we weren't in the Schengen Area say if you wanted less movement within Europe then Remain could have been the right vote.

The other big issue was the money we pay to Europe which was exaggerated; has the falling pound wiped out that 'saving' yet?
How is that a "blatant lie"?

Does that money go to the EU? Yes.

Would that money be freed up for other uses? Yes.

Would some of it end up being reallocated to the NHS? Very likely, given the politics of the UK.

If you'd said ALL of it WILL go on the NHS then you'd be right, but you aren't arguing with that statement.
Yes, the outright attacks are not ok but if you look at the more vocal parts of the British Brexit voters a lot clearly have racist motivations. People I considered almost friends posted on Facebook about throwing all Muslims out after brexit, blaming foreigners in general for a lot that is wrong. Things like: 'it has gone too far, I feel like I live in Islamabad here! OUT!'. These people voted for the Brexit to refuse and throw out foreigners. In their minds anyway. So it is not strange as that is what people see.

There are many who voted for other reasons but those are far less vocal.
"majority rules" is often conflated with democracy.
> What is the reason for moving banking to Frankfurt?

Stability plus the fact that Frankfurt is already a major financial hub, and that Germany is a major driver of the EU economy.
CargoX – Projeto Safety Cargo – Monitoramento de Caminhões Com Drone
Germans went to apologize and pay retributions. Also considerable soul seeking that lasts many decades now.

Russians (there are exceptions certainly, but statistically) are proud for the oppression they did upon the neighbours and cherish it as their golden years and action plan ahead.
The UK (and the EU) programming salaries have been ridiculously low compared to the US for quite a while. In the US I can relatively easy get $100-140 per hour, $150+ with some luck. In the EU I mostly see jobs in the 80k euro range (senior web dev positions).

I hope this is going to change now.
I can assure you that the Scots don't find that amusing at all P:
What happens if you lose your job and, before you find a new one, have serious medical problems? Who picks up the bill?
Which means greater majority of Scots wanted to remain compared to a much smaller majority of the whole UK that wanted to leave. If a 51% vote to leave is relevant enough to warrant the UK leaving the EU then a 60% vote to remain is relevant.
ScalaFX(http://www.scalafx.org/) + IntelliJ and Mono are not exposing any GNU/Linux specific feature.

I can use the same toolchain in many other operating systems.

The last time I bothered to check GNOME, there was some ongoing discussion of JavaScript becoming the official language to pair with C.

Just checked Genie and Vala IDE web sites, they still need to do catch up with what Borland was doing in the 90's, let alone modern IDEs.
You can't be a member of the EU (or the EAA if i remember) and restrict immigration from other EU countries.

When the UK finally leaves then yes that could be how immigration is managed.
Sadly, yes. But he did say "Terminal", so I assumed he meant OS X (ahem... macOS).
You haven't lived until you had to change a 1200-line stored procedure that has at least one 8-way JOIN in it. I've worked in two different companies that had something like that.
We will respect that treaty. But, as all treaties, there is room for interpretation

In other words you do not want the EU to respect the terms of the treaty.

I guess you approve of Juncker. When asked why the Commission was not punishing France for failing to meet the fiscal discipline targets, his answer was "because it's France". Sharp rebuke from the Dutch swiftly followed.
Creator of Min here. If you have any questions, or want help integrating Min into your site, or are wondering how it's different from other CSS frameworks, ask away.

I made Min because I was tired of (IMO) unnecessarily large and bloated tools. For a page to need several hundred kilobytes for CSS -- as a base layer alone -- is ridiculous.
Greece in particular is sort of remarkable in how much of government spending goes to the top 20% and how little to the bottom 20%. See page 5 of this report.

http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2014-Social-Expenditure-Upda...
Withdrawal meaning you want to go back? Hard to find a similar environment anywhere else?

That's me in a nutshell, if not you.
HP Spectre, the world's thinnest laptop, is so much more than just looks
They may leave them open, but for an European engineer it just became a lot less attractive.
From a French perspective, I'd like to state again that everybody is talking about the economical EU, but forget it's only one of the side of it.

For me the main benefit is that my grand father has a tatoo with a number on his wrist, but my brother is in a loving relationship with a blue-eye blond german.

No matter how you slice it, peace is a very nice think too have in an instable world with so many different people living so close to each others.
The idea of "clout" is an incorrect belief that is not supported by the data:

http://www.civitas.org.uk/press/no-benefit-for-uk-trade-from...
The only thing that has changed as of this vote of the three things you listed is the "stability" aspect. Maybe that is sufficient to cause an exodus, but I am not sure.
Do you mean direct cash subsidies?

Or do you mean we don't need copyright protection, limited liability and bankruptcy protection allowing entrepreneurs to take risks, laws protecting investors and corporations, public education system, and so forth?

Why would Edison want all the credit? Newton said he only saw as far as he did by standing on the shoulders of giants. We are all inheriting the accumulated wealth and knowledge of all the people who came before us. Why not the people around immediately before us who built the society we live in?
True. But because as today it's easier to implement doesn't mean we won't have aircraft with flapping wings in the future.
There's talk of London trying to do the same. That'd be a way to solve a lot, but I can't see it happening.
While I really enjoyed Phaser, which in turn made me love TypeScript.

I had some serious issues with performance and trying to maintain 60 frames per second in any 16:9 resolution.

I've been looking into C++ and Java solutions and this book might be the perfect fit.
Just because you can't trace a government dollar directly to Windows 10 doesn't negate the (correct) point that government subsidies directly resulted in the internet and software industry we have today.
No it isn't. I was born in totalitarian communist country and living in EU gives me a deja vu.
The parent commenter is referring to the European Free Trade Association

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Free_Trade_Associatio...
They will not want to, but right now those skilled immigrants can easily come here to work, however if there was a lot of visa work to sort out then they may choose Germany or France over the UK. For an employer in London such as google it means dealing with many visa applications from many countries whereas if they were based in frankfurt or Dublin then they just need to deal with visas for UK applicants.
Wales is little England†, the Welsh voted overwhelmingly to leave. Check the stats again. You're right Scotland and Northern Ireland though. Also the City of London is the small Square Mile at the heart of London geographic area where all the finance happens, that big round thing roughly coinciding with the M25 orbital motorway is called Greater London or just London! :)

† This is not meant as a nationalist slur, or a conflation of identities - it is meant in terms of political sentiments and voting patterns. Scotland and Northern Ireland are far more devolved.
> I want what's best for me and my people and fuck the rest

That's the traditional way. It usually leads to war. We're about to relearn some painful lessons in this century.
>> "Maybe this is the catalyst needed to advance the conversation."

I've said this in another comment but I think it is. We now have an issue that will effect all the people in the North and is more important than the usual sectarian divide. If border controls come into place and it starts to effect people's daily lives (e.g. People living in border counties and working on the other side) there's actual a real debate to be had for once. A border poll has already been called for this morning but of course the secretary of state has dismissed it. I think Scotland will need to vote for independence before Ireland has a shot at it.
This thread is political. Unlike the other thread about the referendum , it has derailed to name-calling.
Judging by today's discussion with friends one issue is that the UK looks very unwelcoming for immigrants like me now.

We won't make any rash decisions but I think my partner and me are going to leave medium term despite us having great and interesting jobs.

That's not a decision based on economics but on "soft" feelings.
> What is the reason for moving banking to Frankfurt? Is there regulatory issues?

London is one of the biggest (or rather the biggest) hub for EUR-denominated trading and AFAIK they're only allowed to do so because they're EU member. There's also the practice called passporting: Bonds, Insurances etc that are regulated in one EU country are allowed to be sold in all EU countries. The UK had the most favorable regulations for those bonds, so a lot of them moved to London. Now that London might soon not be part of the EU any more, the banks at least need a residence in a EU member state. Some might consider to substantially reduce their London operations.
Let's be honest, it is actually the brutality of the French revolution which forced the British royalty to hand over power to the people. And before doing these "peaceful" transitions, all neighbouring countries tried to smother the French with war in order to preserve the priviledges of the remaining monarchies.
Isis.
Racism was one of the major drivers of the 'brexit' camp, as well as a whole pile of fearmongering.

The attacks on the 'British' are just as dumb, since a lot of people (50%, plus a majority of the Scots and the Irish) are being dragged into this.

It's dumb beyond understanding, but it's a nice insight in how much of the lessons learned during the last two world wars have been forgotten.
Samsung Notebook 7 Spin Convertible Laptop-Tablet Gives Flexibility
Ad firm: Doesn’t matter that migrant app doesn’t work, it’s the idea that counts