skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
They'd only have copyright over their own photo (and it's not clear a scan would count). Anybody else could still make another photo with a separate copyright.
While unfortunate, Caltech had years to let the current glassblowr train a replacement - it's not like this was an unforeseeable event.

While it's unfortunate that it's a struggle to find a replacement now - and from the outside I don't know what went on leading up to this - I can't help but think if they'd set the budget for it a decade ago, they wouldn't be in this situation.
A lot of my friends use FB messages/chat instead of e-mail. If i want to stay in touch with them, FB is the only way.

This used to be OKish, when FB did XMPP and i could use any client. That's since been shut down, and the mobile website no longer lets you read messages...
How to analyse swearing in movies and series
People have thought I was a wizard because I could GTFA (Google The Flaming Answer).
Social security and medical security are tangible. I don't know what "financial fortitude" means.

The remainder are things money can't buy. A beautiful woman who is broke has most of them - should we impose the same taxes on her?
Self-Driving Cars May One Day Face Decision of Who to Save or Kill
No, Britain (and any other Westminster style parliament) are party political systems, not presidential. You vote for a party, the party selects its leader.

Of course your average voting citizen has not even a bare understanding of civics 101 and quite often in these circumstances various elements of the press demand a new election in order to make certain the PM has a mandate, if it suits their purposes.

Personally I think it's quite likely to turn out as you suggest, Boris is going to fail to negotiate even the slightest terms from Europe and will call a snap election at some point where the parties themselves will campaign on in or out, where both Labour and Conservatives will be in.
"Would you get into an automated self-driving vehicle, knowing that in the event of an accident, it might sacrifice your life if it meant saving the lives of 10 other people?"

Interesting dilemma.
Here's what we had to say about books mentioned in this thread:

Schiff, J.L. 2008. Cellular Automata: A Discrete View of the World.John Wiley & Sons.
A readable introduction to cellular automata and their applications.

Wolfram, S. 2002. A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media. A very ambitious book trying to demonstrate in detail (the book contains 1,197 pages) that the
entire universe around us (e.g., biological, physical, and computational phenomena) could be and should be considered as cellular automata. While the approach of the author is a matter of heated discussion, the book is thoughtprovoking and contains many interesting examples.

Ilachinski, A. 2001. Cellular Automata: A Discrete Universe. World Scientific Publishing. A detailed (approximately 800-page) and technical exposition of
cellular automata. Includes detailed discussions of various theoretical techniques for studying cellular automata behavior. The proof of the universality of Life is presented in detail. Among the topics covered are probabilistic CA, the relationship between CA and physics models, and a comparison between CA and neural networks.
How would you even distinguish one from another, once they've been processed a bit in graphics software and copied all over the web?
Thanks for mentioning Tcl, in a lot of ways it resembles Lisp/Scheme, and with addition of tailcall, apply, coroutines the resemblance has increased over time. It remains very useful and versatile, and Tcl/Tk may still be the easiest way to create a GUI application that will run on several platforms.
I still remember touring their NYC offices as a kid (I'm 27 now) and meeting some of the writers and editors, getting my name in the Letters to the Editor section with a stupid cheese pun, submitting articles that were swiftly and hilariously rejected, and amassing a collection of vintage and foreign MAD magazines off eBay and trading sites. Fun times.

Who would have thought it would be my dad keeping the subscription to this day!
Star Alien – Vir Mini Series
You do realise MEPs were democratically elected, yes?
> That's a non sequitur.

Why not? An LRU cache is moderately complex specialized data structure. As you see, for some reasons, it’s much simpler to implement in C++ then in Rust.

> The choice made by thee stdlib to not support many linked list operations does not imply Rust is unsuitable for complex specialized data structures

I never said it’s unsuitable. Technically, all modern programming languages are Turing complete, so in some sense they’re equivalent. I only said Rust isn’t good enough for that. Meaning, in many other languages doing that is much simpler than in Rust.

Linked lists are special case of trees, which in turn special case of graphs. Both trees and graphs are used a lot: DOM trees, syntax trees, KD/PK trees, quad edge graphs, and so on.

Rust’s memory management model is neither manual nor garbage collected. This feature makes it hard to implement those pointer-based data structures, where items are in shared ownership of the container, where you want to split/merge those containers, and move items across containers.

Not impossible, just hard and/or inefficient (like those ref.counted implementation that increment/decrement those counters each time I traverse the graph, even if I only reading stuff).
Somehow it's ok to do this, but you're overreacting if you point out politicians blatantly use terror for policy ends.
Does database/sql check syntax at compile time? Or do you just try to unit-test you out of that?
Yes. Definitely Greenland. 92% of the exports go to the EU.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenland%E2%80%93European_Uni...

None of the examples are the same, but they were all in.

There is an article 50 because of these exits. There has been a precedent.
If your ORM allows you to drop down to SQL, which the parent claims all modern ORMs do, then you will still need that SQL parser in your ORM.
> nobody really cares

They will eventually though.

As someone said above, they're not far away enough from the farms yet.
Stockholm-Helsinki might become the first hyperloop superregion
I recently read that Slack has combined salting and hashing with 2FA after their data breach in March 2015. But if I remember well, whenever you want to connect, you can get a "magic link" with an automatically generated password right in your mailbox and then copy-paste it in the app. Has someone tested if it's bullet proof?
Given the high level of statistical certainty that particle physicists strive for from experimental data, how much of a difference does the approach matter by the point where they are confident enough to endorse the theory?

For instance, if you are going for five sigma (like in the Higgs Boson discovery), how would the different techniques change when the data is considered sufficient, if at all?
Here's my interpretation of the result (posted in the hope that it will aid others):

The authors are interested in solving motion planning problems with both fixed and dynamic obstacles. They do this using a combination of offline pre-processing and online search.

During pre-processing a general-purpose PRM (read: state-space graph) is constructed using only information about the movement capabilities of the robot and the location of fixed obstacles in the robot's environment.

At run-time the location of dynamic obstacles is detected and all edges from the PRM which would result in a collision with these dynamic obstacles are pruned away. The remaining problem is easy: just find a shortest path in the remaining graph, from the start location to the goal position.

Anyway, it's this online collision checking operation which they implement in and parallelise with custom hardware.

Neat.

I wonder if in their experiments with software-only planners they also made a distinction between off-line preprocessing and online search? The paper doesn't seem to say. I would hope the comparison is apples-to-apples.
Studios normally use microphones with larger diaphragms, because they sound fuller. But they're too fragile for field recording. Hence small-diaphragm condenser microphones, like your shotgun.
It seems that it is going to freeze some investments and recruitments.

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/26/city-of-lon...

At the end of the article :
"Hood said he had already heard of three deals being put on indefinite hold. There were also reports that investors in technology start-ups in the UK were pulling out because the funds were contingent on Britain remaining in the EU."
There is a typo in the title, can the mods please rename it to fix `Ubuntu`?
People are likely to act much differently when facing an "existential threat". Certainly for the guy worried this could get his family killed, but even just for people who've invested years of work into the Tor project, and think this could lead to it's downfall. For something like Tor, userbase has a particularly key role in maintaining the project.

This is likely something to do with the instinctual "fight or flight" response. I think you can see people who chose each in this chat log.
Nice tool, is there something similar (in terms of UX) for Linux?

For browser I usually use Noscript... Not the same because it only blocks JS files though.
Gömböc
This decision only binds these parties with relation to these pictures in these circumstances. No one else. Other courts, even this Berlin trial/appeals court or an inferior Berlin court, need not pay any attention to this legal reasoning in other cases.
Put them on github or dropbox?
While snarky in tone, he has a point - The Market doesn't have a spectacular track record of having foresight longer than the next quarterly report.
Cheap Essay Writing Service
Essay writing is an important activity for all curriculum. Essay writing is one of the major parts for all exams. Most of the reviews say that cheap essay writing service[http://cheapessaywritingservice.us/] is the customers preferred especially student’s recommended writing service.
> it’s much simpler to implement in C++ then in Rust.

Because of the standard library. This is not a language issue, this is a library issue. This has nothing to do with Rust's memory model. It has to do with Rust's choices of having a smaller, maintainable stdlib and relying on the crates ecosystem for most libraries (which can then evolve independently of the language, which is nice).

Someone has to write a linkedlist implementation of the type you describe and put it in a crate, and that's it; everyone can use that. It should be trivial to make a pull request to https://github.com/contain-rs/linked-list to add the method you describe, for example.

--------

Edit:

Rust does make it harder to implement the bottom level of low level abstractions (doubly linked lists, LRU caches, etc), since these deal with memory the most and can easily become unsafe. You implement them once with a safe API, and use them as much as you want.

The reason std doesn't expose too many unsafe APIs on its datastructures is because if you need that level of control, it is better to have your own implementation. Safety is hard; and the more unsafe APIs you expose, the more you run the risk of external unsafe code depending on the internals of the implementation in the stdlib. Due to this, it would be preferred if you write the LRU cache with a linkedlist implementation embedded in it (which could be a separate crate for reusability), with the invariants well documented. This is a choice made by the stdlib, but has nothing to do with the language itself and is a choice that external crates are free to not follow.
How much rent can be increased per year in Dubai
TeamViewer 10 Crack and License Code Full Free Download
Stallman's writing is reminiscent of The Jargon File or FOLDOC. There are many "silly" terms like the ones you mention in those collections. (More on textfiles.com.) Stallman was a part of that era. Maybe he's just an original 1970's "hacker" trying to stay true to his ideals. They liked to create their own counter culture vocabulary.

Then you have Zuckerberg who puts some blurb in Facebook's first SEC filings that his website^W company will follow the "hacker" ethos. What was he doing there, using that term? He sure has a lot of corporate sponsorship for a "hacker".

Imagine Stallman and Zuckerberg in a certain American game show that ran for several decades. Hint: The game's title relates to honesty.

"Will the real 'hacker' please stand up?"
it even doesn't show a continent properly where I am .
I would suggest it's a serious joke. No one "serious" thinks London could split from the country but believe it is a interesting way to highlight the massive disconnect between rural England and much of the rest of the country

Ironically there are going to be plenty of people who are "voting" for London to leave but don't expect their vote to have an effect and it's just to send a protest message.
Seriously? How about the McDonalds, and Ray Kroc? Never heard of those names?
As far as I know they are not relying on "gsm encryption" to be protected but are sending encrypted messages over sms.
Russians will create nuclear spaceship engine for interplanetary flights
Dynamically typed? Ok I'll move on thanks.
We changed the baity title to the one encoded in the URL, often a good place to look for something more neutral.

Better still would be to change the URL to the paper the article reports on, but it doesn't seem to be accessible online.
I think the problem is more the example than the syntax, it basically has keyword arguments (foo: bar), square brackets for lambda ([echo :x]) and :foo for block arguments.

I.e. this

1 to: 5 do: [echo :x]

is pseudopython's

loop(from=1, to=5, do=lambda x: echo x)
loop(1, 5, lambda x: echo x)

which have comparable punctuation, mostly trading "," for ":" .

Being smalltalkish, you also get extra characters when a block is used for control structures, but that saves on the need to have two different syntaxes for single and multi-line/expression lambdas or N syntaxes for blocks and control structures.

How do you see that handled in your ideal language?
History has proven Stallman right about most things, time and time again.

He's right about this, too.
I think this is very good idea. It seems like it can be pretty useful, let's see if it will be :)
It's a shame the apprenticeship culture isn't as prominent these days. Are we really fine with keeping the torch in the last generation?
Existential types are kind of like OO interfaces (allow storing a collection of things that only have in common that they implement the interface), and typeable can be used for casting them back to their base types.
They are not buying end products. Germany supplies plants (!) for conventional military production. And Rheinmetal financed creation of testing grounds at Mulino.
He's the rockstar of the cogsci department at Berkeley but he's known as a massive ego and a poor professor.

I don't want to be harsh here, but it might be worth for you to consider that you were also a poor student.
No, as that article notes, none of the three examples is a member state withdrawing from the EU. (Two were withdrawals from pre-EU bodies by entities that we not member states when they either became independent of a member state or were granted home rule, and one of those remains associated with the EU as an OCT; the third was a region subject to a member state switching from OMR to OCT status.)
The Strange and Twisting Case of r/A858
Did you miss my entire reply?

Was trying to provide a common point of reference.

Whole Foods exists in the UK and Canada. Trader Joe's does not.
As did Mars pathfinder, 1997.
Except for the time he lost, and within two days a military coup of the democratically elected body put him back in power (amongst other thing):

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-15240081

Forget the excessive gerrymandering or his successful change to the Venezuelan constitution which allowed for him to be reelected indefinitely. He was indeed a lot of things, but his legacy will be mismanaging a country with enough natural resources to be one of the richest countries in the world. He was an authoritarian dictator. Faux democracy with fake votes and a press which is govt controlled and a leader that wants to run forever is a dictatorship no matter how you skin it.
Put them on archive.org? https://archive.org/upload/
I don't agree with this post because its tone threatens my ego. There is hope for humanity.
I am afraid I disagree. Criminal activity has one clear shared goal - to make money. And banks are outrageously complicit in money laundering for criminal organisations.

Yet detecting crime through its laundering of proceeds is probably the most powerful
Single idea we have - imagine a world where you could only commit crime in cash or for free.

We talk about a poverty free world. A crime free world is also possible. Just make sure it does not pay.
The distinction might be petty, but for even a junkie, used might be a more accurate descriptor than user.

As a non-junkie and non-member of the criminal infrastructure, one might see "drug users" feel used more than empowered through their gain of utility. Same is true for facebook "users" as well.

If you see "user" as someone who uses a product, then this discourse is pointless. But if you think of a "user" as someone empowered by products, then using the term "Facebook users" should make you feel uncomfortable.
Well it's nice that the true believers get something entertaining to read, but there are a lot of people looking for reasons to disagree or criticise who might find themselves converted if he put in some effort to address his arguments to them. As the figurehead of Free Software, we should expect more from him than esoteric literature.
> Advertising has been a successful business model for literally centuries.

Surely this explains why nearly every news site out there has been throwing up ad-blocker nag screens over the past few years. They must really be raking that revenue in! Not a troubled financial model at all, no sir!
Url changed from https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2016/06/24/air-gapped-comput..., which points to this.
Completely agree. When I was working for a French bank, I saw how the US treats money laundering and it's an absolute nightmare. Let's take the example of a transaction that is processed in EUR by a French bank, from a French company to a Chinese company, on goods manufactured in, let's say, Ivory Coast. If in the email discussion, somebody answers while he/she in the US for holidays, then the transaction will fall under Fatca while there is absolutely no US interests affected whatsoever. Bottom line: Fatca is not only about money laundering, it is largely about maintaining the US dominance of international banking.
I wonder how many skills like this are getting harder and harder to find as people retire?

I'm reminded of an article I read about 20 years ago by James Boyk, who was Caltech's music lab director and pianist in residence, about the difficulty of finding piano technicians skilled enough to maintain pianos for concert level pianists after his long time piano technician moved away [1].

[1] http://www.its.caltech.edu/~boyk/essay.htm
I'll leave you to ponder whether or not HN wishes to officially link directly to Sci-Hub.

That said, those willing to thumb their noses at paywalled science may do so here: http://31.184.194.81/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleD...
Haven't red all comments and maybe somebody already mentioned this, but here are my few cents:

I've worked with multiple ORM frameworks during my career. And I always reached the point where developer needs focus to framework internals instead of delivering new features.

Yes, usually most situation which developer didn't expected can be solved by configuring ORM framework, changing some configuration, providing additional parameters or calling some methods, but what that means? You need fully understand your framework if you want to be sure you application does exactly what you want and not misbehave.

So next time when you'll be thinking grab ORM to make things simpler, ask yourself if you really have enough time to fully learn the framework?
> Copy protection protects CDs from being copied

For 99.999% of the users, it restricts the user from copying the CD. And actually, the CD itself doesn't really care if it's copied, so the cd itself is not "protected" in any way. It provides some minimal protection to the rights owner from unauthorized copies (which are usually, but not necessarily illegal - c.f fair use).

Now, which terminology is more appropriate - that which describes the situation for essentially everyone involved (e.g. a billion people) or the rights holder (essentially less than 10 "people" if you count corporations as people)?

> Digital rights management manages the rights of the IP owner. These are just as valid.

Again, they are valid from the narrow point of view of 0.001% of the population, but INVALID and IRRELEVANT from the point of view of the rest.

"Copy Restriction" and "Digital Restriction Management" are factual and actually neutral. It is what these systems do. Whether this is good or bad depends on your point of view.

Similarly, it wasn't mentioned here, but stallman likes to refer to "Intellectual Property" as "Imaginary Property", which is also factual. I have yet to adopt this one, but I will only really accept "Intellectual Property" as property when it is taxed like property.
I hadn't realised UDF worked on non-optical storage. That's handy to know. Thanks
The BSD licence only exists because Stallman lobbied for it IIRC.
Why Brexit happened the lens of Japan
Mostly quality, but also pricing. IMO the meat is average price and the produce is maybe a little cheaper, but the quality of both is generally very poor, especially the meat. I've had meat that was a few days away from going rancid from several different Trader Joe's locations.
Either you employ some sort of malware detection on your login page. Modern trojans mostly inject stuff into web pages, so things like Trusteer Pinpoint will scan the DOM and report back anomalies. Based on those reports you block the user from logging in or send them to a safe sandbox so they can't do any damage to their accounts.

Alternatively, you can work with your clients' ISPs. Most malware still exhibits visible communication patterns, either by getting in touch with other bots or by contacting command-and-control servers. Once you get ISPs to notice that sort of behaviour, they can sandbox their clients and have them clean up their systems before they reach the Internet (and disclose all of their data).
Yours is an example of an interesting comment. Had he made an actual argument I wouldn't have called it out.
Love it, thanks. DOOM is some sort of genius.
RMS is both.....emacs and gcc and the GNU userland, etc are the tasty meal.
i m busy with spanish wedding in krjc with honey lunchuuan thru lukas in wien I'm not kg passport CIA left hand Bronx sky falls first floor not 12 floor 13 in atlanta tennis karven
To be fair, even the most battle tested of file systems can run into occasional glitches like this when running on consumer hardware. So on any sufficiently large forum, you'll always find a few members that have experienced data loss at some point on an otherwise agreed to be stable file system driver. But for what it's worth, I've been using ntfs-3g for about 15 years and never had a single issue with it. So as much as I do sympathise with your pain, it's definitely more an edge case than the norm.