skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> when the US was founded and for much of its history

When the US was founded and for much of its history, women couldn't vote. And this was the intention of the founders. And it's irrelevant.

You judge a political entity by its current state. They can vote now. And now, you elect your Senators directly. You also elect your President directly, albeit within the confines of your state.

> Like the US, the EU will evolve

I disagree with you here, there is no guarantee of this. It may, it may not.

> the EU members are elected by the people's representatives, which is hardly no control or will of the people.

Selection is very different from election, even if done by those who were elected. Nobody is screaming dictatorship here, but it really isn't the same thing.
Off the top of my head, there are a couple of examples that might change your mind. Freeway road signs. They need to communicate what lane to be in to a broad range of drivers, in stressful situations, very quickly. You should never notice a good interchange sign. a quick glance is enough to know you need to be in the second or third lane. A bad sign leads to bad driving, or a missed exit, depending on the aggression of the driver.

Airport signage is another pretty good example. I always look for the little man/woman symbols with an arrow pointing to the restrooms. I've missed signs that actually say "Restrooms ->" because there's so much visual clutter in airports. And i'm usually tired and a bit stressed out about making my connection.

Perhaps it is pseudoscience. In this context, I'd be willing to agree it's all just learned conventions. I'd argue, studying those conventions, and exploiting them is more than nothing though.

You should never remember a good sign. it's noticed, used and forgotten. You will always remember a bad sign.
So what exactly is your solution? Are you happy with facebook leaving up nasty cyberbullying, which then results in people killing themselves? What about people posting and sharing plans to blow up schools? Or how about if I posted something on facebook saying that jimmywanger is a pedophile, and your neighbours saw it and then drove you out of your home?

A lot of these things are covered by libel, cyberbullying and hate speech laws, and it is a jury of your peers who decides whether or not it fulfils the critera. It seems to make sense - from both a moral and legal standpoint - for companies to nip this stuff in the bud before it reaches the point of going to court.
I think Switzerland put some limitations to free movement recently. The EU retaliated by removing access to student programs like ERASMUS for Swiss citizens. A nasty story.
So why were all those migrants camped in Calais, and why are smugglers transporting them clandestinely?
When the international bankers couldn't pass the Aldrich bill, they renamed it the federal reserve bill, started a public campaign about how "bad for the banks" the bill would be, while secretly funding economics professors across the country. The people, thinking anything bad for the bank was good for the people, campaigned for the federal reserve bill, and it was passed by only a few people after much of the house/senate had gone home for the holidays.

I highly suspect a similar style of propaganda going on with the brexit, up to and including voting fraud. I think the electronic voting systems are highly likely to be manipulable.
Жана is what I like to call a vicarious sex addict. There are very good reasons why monogamous relationships are prevalent worldwide (yes, thanks for pointing out the exceptions everyone), starting with health, finances, emotional balance, joy, fulfillment, etc - too many to document and beyond scope here.

She has taken a common weakness most if not all people have - who isn't crazy about sex (or ideas about sex) - and under the guise of "research", 'legitimized' by her field of study, she passes herself off as helpful, beneficial, as if contributing to anything other than her insatiable appstite for all things sexual... Her website is worthy of writing a 50 shades of gray sequel, just off the compilation of all the stories...

People like her end up dead, at worst, or depressed, alone, basically dinged in the head, mentally, spiritually and every other way possible.

That's what obsession with sex does, 10 out of 10....I've seen ot firsthand and have seen it in fellow sex addicts both male and female, more times than I care tp recount.

There is no light down that tunnel... I hope she turns away and makes something of her life.
The BLACKBIRD: the first fully adjustable car rig that creates photoreal CG cars
The Mill BLACKBIRD
If both of you can separate the emotional from the physical and are open with your true intentions, then casual sex can be a nice way to avoid the emotional effort involved in a healthy relationship
Telegram uses homegrown crypto with known weaknesses[1] and doesn't do end-to-end encryption by default (your messages are stored on their server in plain text).

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10713064
> Humans enjoy their bodies. We play sports because it's fun and feels good. We enjoy the burn of a good run. We like to look in the mirror and see something vaguely attractive. We like to fuck. And we want to fuck people we find attractive.

Please excuse the low effort comment, but I've seen far more people who treat their body terribly, and who become overweight/obese compared to the number of people who do anything close to keeping in shape with sports, running, and so on. Not that that stops people from fucking, but the proportion of athletic, attractive people fucking is far lower than you might make it out to be.
Zdziarski's "iOS Forensic Investigative Methods"[0] is a free eBook which can be helpful if you're interested in native penetration testing.

[0]: http://www.zdziarski.com/blog/?p=2287
Postgres is interesting and, well, super cool, but it wasn't a tenable option for us. Not sure if it came up, I just know that we couldn't make a business case for it. But man, Postgres has maybe the best vendor option for document store IMO!
Well, Trump isn't saying we should kill them, only deport them. I think that is objectionable, but I don't think it meets the criteria for hate speech. There is obviously a line, and Trump hasn't quite crossed it yet.
That sounds like part of the OST of one Star Trek movie (Star Trek 8, in fact), and a dozen more movies I saw.
Can you explain this causality?
Exactly. In addition to that, this is a chance to collaborate to build more and better commands. It's the first step to what could be a powerful and very useful developer tool.
I think you do not understand my proposal.

I did not propose to replace intel's signing key, although that would also be possible[0]. I'm suggesting to add an additional keypair that can be used to decrypt a secure enclave's memory. Let's call it the backdoor key. Because this is a legit backdoor, to be used by the owner of the house.

Attestation would be performed with intel's key (so you know it's not an emulator) but also indicate which keypair could be used to break the enclave (so you know who has access to the backdoor).

By default that could be an invalid (unusuable) key. If you want to debug enclaves, e.g. because you suspect they run malware, you would add your own. If you want to run on a cloud provider, you send your own to the cloud provider. If you want to protect your own stuff from malware or rubberhose cryptanalysis, you don't need one and can leave the invalid key or one with a discarded private key in place.

To preempt a possible objection: This backdoor does not work retroactively. Only enclaves created after changing the key will be affected by it and it will show up in their attestation. So an attacker with physical access would not gain access to past encrypted data, forward secrecy remains intact.

[0] To fully replace intel's key it would either require a write-only procedure to get it into the hardware at boot time, which would only make sense with physical access to the machine, or one would have to replace the old key with the new one from within an enclave, that way you would ensure trust-continuity and thus avoid the emulation problem.
Please do get a bachelors degree. Don't dropout in India. Prepare for long term. Your career is 40-45 years. I have thought about this when I was studying in a not so great college in India. But I finished college and immediately got into Facebook and now doing great in Google.

I have made good connections in Google now who will quit with me to do a startup.
Yes, r/the_donald was regularly getting to the top of r/all before the change. However so was r/sweden with the anti-trump memes and r/enoughtrumpspam . So either let it be a trump-antitrump war or alter r/all to be something useful such as promoting posts that are exceptionally highly upvoted across all subreddits.
Shake is more complete than Natron still - and some parts of Shake are still world class, the spline-based warping for example is still on par with Nuke and Flame, and the included versions of Keylight and Primatte haven't been hugely improved on since. And Smoothcam is super handy.

I have had to take increasingly drastic measures to keep it running on modern Linuxes though, and on OS X it sadly now seems impossible :(
Yes, definitely use source maps in all of your JS.
Scott Adams isn't very smart, I don't think. His blog posts and essays are, far more often than not, really surprisingly shallow.

Regarding Donald Trump's racism, this is how he can be racist without saying "black people are stupid and smelly" on national TV:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics
I'll revise my previous statement to "You get to vote for 1/3 in the EU."

I will note that this legislative body has no capacity to actually introduce legislation, as noted in the very article you quoted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Parliament#Legislativ...
At this point why not Matrix?
Spoiled Rotten (2012)
"A high-performance non-recursive DNS resolver"

I believe a better description for this program would be a "stub resolver".
A lot of privatised systems work very well. Denmark has an almost entirely privatised emergency system; one company alone runs 65% of their fire brigades and 85% of their ambulance services, and it seems to work great.

Frankly, this story seems to be "terribly run towns that mismanaged their way almost into bankruptcy and can no longer afford to provide critical services are also terrible at negotiating other contracts too!" Which, you know...yeah?
Sixth largest: https://reportuk.org/2016/06/24/france-overtakes-uk-as-fifth...

One of the reasons they are such a large economy is because they are the financial gateway to Europe. If your global rank is conditional on having single market access to the EU, you can't really use that as a bargaining power for getting access to that same market...

But yes, they should be able to negotiate a better deal than Norway.
The arts are a source of renewable and intangible value. This is well known and a cornerstone of the life I live. I would list my own interests but it would be largely masturbatory to do so.

Unfortunately the growth and sustenance of British culture is largely hamstrung by the London centric governance of the last forty years. In many ways the entire brexit can be seen as an anti-London situation (everywhere but London and Scotland vote out, Scotland are on the SNP line who are anti-London).

Know this. The best and the brightest all left the county I grew up in. They are told by their new peers that they should look down upon the places they came from.

There should be no surprise that when my peers write verse it doesn't dream of home or that when they colour canvas it doesn't reveal our fells.

But they will accompany to the local great garden, and sit upon the grass, and talk of love, confusion, hope, and futures.
WTF? I specifically did not say "everyone" anywhere. "It was a factor for some portion". And yes, some people voted for Obama specifically because of his race (and some voted against him because of his race). Others had other reasons for voting; same with Brexit voters.
My point is that people have differing views on what they call "promiscuity" and even how they define virginity.

Granted, using your own definition of what constitutes "sex", no one would ever say that you're engaging in "casual sex" or are "promiscuous", since you not willing to have any sexual contact at all.

But in the wider societal view, it's still possible to have regular casual sex with a single partner without also being branded as "promiscuous". And since "virginity" doesn't have a single definition, even possible for one to engage in some sexual activity while remaining a virgin.
In general, I like to read viewpoints that are different than mine, it's challenging. Listening to people who agree with me is boring. Dog whistle politics is certainly pervasive in politics on all sides, and it is an important thing for people to recognize.
It depends on your perspective. There may be the one wave, but a wave has both a crest and a trough. So there is the one wave, but as you ride down its backside into the trough that second wave appears far bigger despite it not technically being a rogue.
(W)here Lies Constance Wilde?
Usually. It's also why some institutions will lock you out entirely without a visit for a photo ID check. Pre-designated people in some high-security settings with optional tokens or biometrics.

Now, some measures you run into will exist because a non-security expert formulated them to cover their ass after reading something online or in a bookstore. Or by security people who also have to comply with a policy or regulation of varying degrees of sanity. So, it's not always a real attack or risk inspiring specific measures but often is for verification during support.
(Great Video) – B2B Growth Hacking Tactics
Paywalled..?
Small+Business+Strategy+Archives+-+Marketing+Mojo+for+Small+Business
The most embarrassing of this whole topic is that research about it has only just started. Sometimes I really feel like we are living in the dark ages.
More than just being a wealthy elite business owner, Donald Trump has been sued thousands of times by contractors for simply not paying them for work they've done.

If he ever cared about income inequality, he could have started by paying the bills to the people he hired to do work for him.
The Alto could have used a column-major buffer and a sideways display, but that makes software more complex. For instance, text is in rows so its easier to render row-major. Using an 875 scanline display was easier - just change some resistors and capacitors in the monitor. (The exact resistors and capacitors are listed on page 36 of http://bitsavers.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/pdf/xerox/alto/...)
I don't buy this argument. The author is trying to fit the Brexit vote into his broader thesis about economic inequality, but it doesn't quite fit the facts.

I echo that.

While I completely agree with "Western Establishment Failure" being at work, it cannot be reduced to "globalization loosers".

More factors at work:

1) "collusive arrangements" emerge over time within societies. The EU served as proxy against those collusions in many countries (Freedom of movement, Gay Rights, Customer Protection), as did the Unionists for many against the Federalists during US Civil War. But over time new collusions emerge.

Many Europeans don't see the many positives the EU brought them, but fear the precedent it set in implementing those positives (usually by ruling over a country's laws) now being used for many more collusions.

2) social media's impact on western culture like

- "Filter Bubbles" (Recommended/Shared content forming personalized propaganda) and

- encouraging communicational behaviour different than the classical "shame"- and "guilt"-culture models, in that in online discussions guilt and shame is virtually non-existent for one self. They are only attributes to lay on others

- both are translating into real-world elite-phenomenons like "vindictive protectiveness" - were things like restrooms become a heated debate, but old-school-phenomenons like safety, income inequality, health are not

3) the loss of the West's common enemy. Nations are "imagined communites" and while they are made of many things, the finishing usually happened when the common enemy emerged. And that's working for supra-nations as well. The Soviet Bloc is gone and our new "culprits" don't fit into its shoes: Not China, not Russia and also not Islam
Then ad-walled.
Everything at FT is paywalled, AFAIK.
I suppose a CPU would contain some secret key material of its own, that can be used to authenticate the hardware.
I bet you've seen plenty. Rogues exist amongst small waves. I bet that you have looked strait at a great many but dismissed them as a trick of light. Ever thought you saw something like a boat out of the corner of your eye yet there wasn't anything there? You may have been seeing a small rogue rise up and fall away.
Apologies. I was projecting the US situation onto the UK. It's hard to see a parallel to Leave in the US that would highlight what I see in US MSM. Trump comes to mind, but advocacy for him is further outside the US MSM Overton than Leave was for the UK.
Your reply seems both patronizing and critical of the researcher's personal qualities, without apparently any objective reason other than puritanical "sex is bad". I am really surprised seeing a comment like this on HN.
Freedom of movement exists independently of Schengen. Freedom of movement gives you the right to move freely between the territories of the states, but does not preclude border control. There is/was freedom of movement between the UK and the rest of the EU, even if the UK performed border checks. Freedom of movement meant that if you prove that you are an EU citizen, they can not prevent you from entering.

The pillar that supports this and other freedoms is the political machinery in Brussels ("the EU"), and without it it all comes tumbling down. European states are not to be trusted to act in the interest of all Europeans when left on their own. They have proven the opposite throughout history, and will do so again. Make no mistake, these rights and freedoms will disappear without political union.
nah. It seems like webassembly doesn't provide much so I am slightly against it or at least neutral. If you could compile an overrirde i would be full on extremely negative on it. Brendan Eich tweeted it wouldn't matter, but he had some caveats.
> You are lacking a very basic level of understanding of how the EU works and why it is structured the way it is.

Thank you for educating me.

> You are calling for something the UK has always blocked.

I think you're confusing the populace at large with their representatives. That is exactly the distinction I was trying to make. You can have a desire to not be a part of an institution that was designed by the very representatives you elected.

> Also, you don't seem to know that there is an European Parliament?

Based on my reading of the subject, they can't introduce legislation? Merely vote on it? And if they approve, another body which is not elected, must also approve before legislation is enacted?
In all likelihood the UK will retain access to the single market through membership of the EEA and EFTA.

This does mean the UK will have to continue allowing free movement.

That said, members of the EEA have the power (under Article 112 of the EEA Agreement) to place an "emergency brake" on free movement if "serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties" liable to persist are arising.

Although much of the leave vote was driven by opposition to uncontrolled migration, and continued participation in the single market will be seen by many as backtracking on this, this power (which the UK does not currently have as an EU member state) should be a sufficient degree of control for most.
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2016/jun/24/the-are...
I love Mars (worth noting Holst wrote it between 1914 and 1916), it's jaw-dropping to discover all the references that John WiIliams was inspired from for Star Wars' music...
https://youtu.be/5pM2SozsyPE

Also, obligatory Venture Bros reference ;)
https://youtu.be/K0iTfasIpLc?t=1m34s
A "public good" is, technically speaking, one which is "non-excludable and non-rivalrous". In a dense urban area, firefighting is clearly a public good, because to stop the building owned by Paying Client A burning down, you need to stop the building next door owned by Non-Paying Client B burning. You can't just stand around and make sure it doesn't spread across the property line to paying clients. Or to flip it around, paying firefighters to fight your fire benefits everyone around you.

In non-urban areas, at least if there's no serious risk of wildfires, firefighting is clearly not a public good. If your farmhouse start to burn, it's not going to threaten anyone but you, and paying firefighters to save it doesn't benefit anyone but you.

And in a (rare?) case of economic theory working in practice too, that's what we often observe: Rural fire departments often require fees to be paid, and won't fight fires if you haven't paid up.

(That being said: Just because rural firefighting isn't a public good doesn't mean it shouldn't be communally funded out of general taxation. Lots of what governments spend their money on aren't actual public goods.)
please, don't mistake this genuine question as an attack on your opinion - why have you made this decision? do you feel as though this benefits you some way? if so, how?

again, i'm not trying to debase you/your beliefs/opinions, i'm just curious.
I think the parent post did give reasons for his vote, rational and reasonable ones. I disagree with them mostly and voted a different way, but if one vote in one small country can destroy the global economy then it was in pretty bad shape anyway. Lehman Brothers would not have caused meltdown in a financially secure global system.

We must respect our democratic outcome and turn it to the best advantage of everyone.

Perhaps a more democratic Europe. It seems a goal we can get behind.

Edit: ok he did not say how he voted only "friends of his".
I would hardly call pointing out the judges membership in La Raza a latino supremacist group racist?
They should've made the EU -> UK border control guy Boris Johnson. Would've been triple as effective.
APL examples seem to suffer from the perl problem: people squash stupendous amounts of code in to single lines rendering them all but unreadable to newcomers.

Perhaps a revised APL with more modern/simplified symbols and some syntactic rules reducing the scope for jumbled muck, and an IDE that translates the symbols in to native human language explanations on mouseover.
There are some striking demographic correlations between Leave voters and people who admitted to being racially prejudiced.

I think self-assessments on negative habits are wrought with problems, I wouldn't rely on those for anything.

But your comment made me realize something else: if people identify problems that you recognize, and you then see those people vilified as racists, you may start to question your beliefs. But the second and third time this happens, you may start to question the label itself.

I'm not happy with the above phrasing, so I apologize for my runaway train of thought. But I think people are happy to self-assess as racists because they identify with demonized politicians, not necessarily because they are aware of their own racism. It becomes a badge of honour, so to speak.
There's already been collaboration among the various *nix operating systems.
UK voters voice doubt over referendum choice
man <command>.

And if people are in the command line often enough, they do memorize the actual commands. They really, really do.
Every generation thinks they are the ones that invented sex.
Given that parsing C++ may be Turing complete¹ I'm not exactly sure that's the best example to use. The world _is_ littered with a million JavaScript and Python parsers.

¹ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14589346/is-c-context-fre...