skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The implication is that the rest of the team felt comfortable enough in that environment that they could change the channel without even having to ask, while OP was loudly ridiculed for wanting to change the channel in a more polite way. The rest of the team felt comfortable with the team dynamic in a way that OP did not, and by ridiculing her, they made it clear that her desires were less important than theirs, thus proving that her sense of discomfort was justified.

To put it as clearly and simply as possible, as if we were examining the results of a double-blind clinical trial:

OP attempts to change the channel. OP is loudly ridiculed in an unpleasant way.

Rando teammate changes the channel. Everyone thinks it's a really funny joke.

What changed? Just the OP. It's pretty obvious the team doesn't like her the way it likes the rest of its members. Is this necessarily an example of sexism, like the seat-belt incident that OP also references? Not necessarily, but it's certainly quite alienating.

Also, while I'm generally sympathetic to the idea that there is a hierarchy of things that are better and things that are worse, how impactful an event is, is ultimately subjective and often not under any conscious control. The time I was mugged in San Francisco honestly made much less of an impression than the time my coworker said he hated all of us and refused to go out for lunch.
I started archiving the slock.it #general slack channel when this attack began. This is where most of the discussion has been taking place. Here's up until a few minutes ago:

http://pastebin.com/DykumjLs
The thing is, once you find that the logic of how you decide what to do includes good actions being conditional on being virtuous, it becomes clear that the part about self interest is not essential, and your logic would be clearer if you refactored it to remove that.
You are right about automating.

Here is Ansible playbook I recently created https://github.com/chhantyal/5minutes
I thought the same on first reading.

But now I think the author felt the first more strongly because it made her feel "not even worth consideration" rather than "merely" objectified, which presumably is something she might have more familiarity/ability to cope with.
Is this related to https://www.ethereum.org/ ?

"Ethereum is a decentralized platform for applications that run exactly as programmed without any chance of fraud, censorship or third-party interference."

Right ...
Shitty Password Manager
Somehow I still can't consider a webapp in a window a 'desktop app'. I'm still waiting for QHangups to migrate to QWebEngine. (http://github.com/xmikos/qhangups)
The system's only as good as the code you write on it.
This is how I understand the situation:

- 2,436,828 Ethereum has been routed to the address starting "0x304a554a310c7e546" [0]

- This is worth roughly $46,000,000.

- This has happened because there is some weakness in the Ethereum security

- The conversion between Ethereum and USD is dropping significantly, now down to 16. [1]

Due to this security threat, the developer is telling people to try to effectively DDOS the service in order to stop all transactions. Also, people are being told to split, but I can't see why.

Copy of page at 9:45:
- http://puu.sh/pvOqy/929f40bddb.png

[0] https://etherchain.org/account/0x304a554a310c7e546dfe434669c...

[1] http://puu.sh/pvOVw/5443a70ced.png
Real time chart for DAO/BTC (Down 41% currently): https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_dao
This makes tons of sense, especially in these early days of self-driving vehicles. There are of course enthusiasts who will want nothing to do with self-driving until the very end when their manual gearboxes are ripped from their cold, dead hands, who would honestly prefer precisely zero touch screens in their current and future vehicles (I consider myself part of this group). We're a small minority though, and as evidenced by how many cars are still available in the US with even the option to row your own, I don't think it's going to stop any manufacturer from eliminating the possibility of manual control entirely within the next few decades.
That's a very relaxed outcome... I agree however, sometimes you just need to suck it up and get on with things.

Every day I get treated like dirt. I've been in the industry nearly two decades, and everywhere you go there's arseholes. You've just got to rise above it, take that paycheque home and just think 'fuck em all'.
Accessibility: blind users on mobile devices
This, and it appears it's between 2 to 5 times more expensive than other well-established boards.
"It's a trap"
Is this a weakness on Ethereum or the DAO?
Jetbrains' editors for e.g. Python help me significantly less than their editors for e.g. java.

Not that it's a bad thing, but basically Pycharm is an editor with some nice-to-have Python env integration, linter, etc. IntelliJ has significantly better refactoring tools.
I would argue this is skewed, as the official campaign name for the stay camp is 'Remain' - is there a map with this term as well ?
Can someone explain what is going on here?
This pretty directly contradicts a lot of the hype around Ethereum. Yes, bad contract code is bad, but a lot of money is about to evaporate. If it isn't easy to write secure contracts then there is a serious deployment problem.
I feel like it is a diversity issue, albeit not of the usual kind, and it is not exclusive to groups whose identity is strongly linked to gender.

All groups will try and preserve their own identity, because if they don't, they stop existing. I'm merely making an observation here, not condoning the actions of groups. This kind of behaviour may seem harmless in some situations, but then also fuels some of the worst instances of discrimination humanity has seen.
0xbb9bc244d is the The DAO account.
We use group hangout chat at work all the time. Considering Google is not even top 5 in chat market, I don't know why are you even worried about Google when Facebook has more private chat information than any other company.
Just remember, when the developers inevitably appear with suggestions about how to stop the hack, roll back the blockchain, or come up with other schemes to block the hackers, they are showing everyone that all the talk of blockchains being decentralised, or being beyond the control of governments or other powers... is a complete lie.

If this hack can be stopped, then it demonstrates that the currency can be manipulated, that the decentralised system is not so fault tolerant or uncensored after all, and that people out there know this.
No, it isn't directly related to Ethereum(ETH). The DAO is a thing built on top of ETH that is supposed to operate like a decentralized corporation direct through direct democracy of it's constituent investors. It's website is, https://daohub.org/
You have misrepresented the case, although I do agree that it's not overtly a male/female thing.

People are in a shared TV-viewing area. There is something being shown on TV. New person enters and decides to change the channel without asking.

This is the action of a total dickhead. I don't care what the established ritual is. If a group of people are clearly watching something else (and they must be, because here they are in the tv viewing area, and something else in being shown, and if they wanted to watch something else they'd have already changed the channel), to pick up the remote and change channel without asking is the action of a dickhead.

Possibly the action of someone on the aspergic scale, possibly the action of a sociopath who just doesn't care what other people want.
Coming in and changing the channel without asking is simply a massive dickhead thing.
Which is wrong. As is the use of "absolutely" - to show that you have the universe-opinion. What hubris. And it does not matter that some guy "himself" posted some opinion either. Right were you link to there are different opinions from other people that show more thought was put into them. The "pg" comment actually is the only one for your argument, all others are against!
Why is it so difficult to have the empathy to say: ok every n'th day we switch to program B for her? Because too many mens clubs lack empathy and respect. It's that dead simple. (I am male).
+1 for administration (esp. hot stand-by).
So good. I'm on the other end of the spectrum. I'd love more beginner videos about how to build a simple CRUD app that lets PG do the heavy lifting.

Most web frameworks focus on routing/validations/sessions and new programmers like me tend to write the data storage logic around the library, even though SQL is so much nicer and intuitive for this sort of thing.
THEY'RE GOING FOR THE GARBAGE FILE!!!
The name of this project reminded me a silly Ukrainian joke:

— ... ("have you been in the zoo?")
— ... ("yes, I saw a yak!")
— І як як? ("so how was the yak?")
— Як як як. ("Like a yak")
"Touching me a lot in the process" was a bit ambiguous to me. It was a sports car, and I've ridden in a sports car with a male co-worker (and I'm male), and I had to reach around awkwardly to get the seatbelt in his small expensive sports car.

I wouldn't help another man out with a buckle, and I'd feel really weird if one helped me with one, but if that "uh, I don't want to reach toward my male co-worker in a confined space" thing wasn't there, I could totally imagine at least reaching over and grabbing the buckle and handing it to the person, and they might happen to brush against me in the process. This is potentially a "male-male interaction weirdness" kind of gender treatment difference. If the guy grew up with younger siblings he might even be in the habit of doing this kind of thing without thinking.

Again, that's where the ambiguity comes in. If, due to female anatomy, the back side of his arm happened to brush against her chest as he reached for a buckle in a confined space, that could be considered "touching her a lot", but is that the same as a grope?

Also, let's say he did have some intent to have some physical contact. She doesn't explicitly say where he "touched her a lot". Was it on the leg while he was buckling her, on her shoulder as he was reaching for the buckle? Maybe he was in fact trying to initiate some limited physical contact, known outside the work world in some circles as "kino". "Kino" from someone you're not attracted to is seen as creepy, whereas from someone you are attracted to isn't, and let's be honest here, we don't all explicitly say "may I brush against you as I reach for this buckle" or "may I kiss you" etc.

In a perfect world, unwanted touching wouldn't happen at all, but playing devil's advocate here... here's a guy with his female coworker (and work is where the most marriages happen outside of college, I've read) who agrees to take a ride in his sports car. Aside from explicit verbal discussion about it (which again doesn't happen 95% of the time when contact IS wanted) this guy had some reason to think she might be interested, and initiated some possibly very casual contact. Unless it was an outright grope, I don't know that I'd read so much negative intent into it. At some point people try to break the ice.

For example, at various jobs I've had male coworkers touch my arms or shoulders while speaking to me. Some people think that this helps establish more psychological closeness, although I often don't appreciate it, but I understand the intent. Unless someone were to go out of their way to grope on me, I tend to brush it off and move on with my day.

It's totally possible her experience was different than what I'm reading into it, but again, it was ambiguous enough that I can see other possible interpretations of that interaction.
Ongoing attack on TheDAO – ETH draining from the pot
I'm working on a babel plugin [1] that should make the migration even more gradual. At the end of the process you get both static and runtime type safety.

[1] https://github.com/gcanti/babel-plugin-tcomb
This has some relation to the "Disney Method" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disney_method) where one delays self-criticism until after one has engineered out the problem, and delays engineering things out until one has dreamed up ideas. Of course the Disney Method is cyclical, and requires returning to the dreaming-up state and on from there.

This also reminds me of how 35mm street/photojournalists work (see, for example, Garry Winogrand, or Josef Koudelka, or Robert Frank). One makes tens of thousands of images, culls them down via work prints to hundreds, then choose a few dozen to print well as the final work. The final images appear inevitable, though it's unclear if there was something magical in the moment of the photography, or the culling process is the secret. See http://www.nga.gov/content/ngaweb/features/robert-frank/the-... for an example of Robert Frank's contact sheets and how he homed/honed in on an image.

EDIT/ADDITION: A fiction writer I met teaches her students to make three passes at their work. As I recall, she described the first being for ideas, the second for intentions, the third is to make it read as inevitable.
It's almost as if a cryptocurrency system used by the grey market and black market sections of the internet contained actual blackhats. What a surprise.

Much as I hate to link to reddit, for effective and biting criticism of cryptocurrencies: http://reddit.com/r/buttcoin
A re-used rocket should be more reliable than the first go-around. Purely because if anything is likely to go wrong it will either happen on the first run or after N runs that is enough to wear a component out. N is likely much greater than 1.
Space Data's invention looks more novel to me from what was done with balloons in the 50's than Edison's light bulb from Swan's and others, YMMV.
Yep, it has more to do with team dynamics and authority levels than anything related to sexism.

It's a simple fact that usually in groups the majority rules. The majority wanted to watch baseball, not Friends.
The provided link is just a page showing a bunch of transactions. For someone like me, who is not so intimate with the Ethereum terminology in use (but who is still interested in the DAO, as an observer), could someone provide a layman's explanation of what's going on?

Somewhat more specifically, I'm wondering the following:

- At a high level, what does this attack actually consist of?

- How does ethereum "go missing" in a distributed blockchain, where you can see all the transaction endpoints?

- Who loses and who gains from an attack of this scale?

- How severe could this attack be - does it pose an existential threat to The DAO (or Ethereum, more broadly)?

- How is this attack being perpetrated? Has the attack vector been previously anticipated? Why is this unexpected?
>if the point is to make these results accessible to a wider audience

It is not. While it's a big, growing field, it's really a narrow audience that can be expected to understand this, far from everyone in the field. How intuitive the writing appears is subjective. I'm sure I don't understand a word of it, not just for lack of intuition.
This is why I prefer https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chiemgauer
For context 2 Million ETH is in the 30-40 million USD range at recent market prices.
What happend to democracy lately ?
No money is going to evaporate. First of all, the value just changes hands and second of all, there is no money involved, just toy bits.
> On August 26, 2012—more than three weeks before King announced her discovery to the world, when only her inner circle knew of the papyrus and her name for it—Walter Fritz registered the domain name www.gospelofjesuswife.com.

This. He should've registered www.howtoforge.com too, just in case :-)
OpenJDK check by PVS-Studio
A lot of the time that type names end up in method parameters, it's due to a lack of support of overloading in the language.

In particular, isn't Dart (the language described here) one such language? It's been a while since I used it, and I never wrote much, but I at least thought that was the case.
I think she blogged about this because it's a very small incident, but it had a very powerful effect on her.

I worked at a womens' clothing store for a while and I often felt like my opinion wasn't valued. The staff was mostly made up of women and I was treated inappropriately in the form of sexual harassment and unprofessional workplace conversations. I tried my best to keep out of it but I must admit I made mistakes.

Anyway, in the morning we often had a 'ritual' that we'd all get coffee in the backroom and talk about anything the store needed that day. I really liked what seemed like a time for open communication in the beginning. Everyone would have their coffee mugs lined up next to the machine - but for some reason another gal always moved my mug to the other side - she'd often separate property by gender? It was strange, to say the least... I always just put my mug with the others, but I started noticing that she would separate them. Over time this began to really bother me simply because of how small and benign it should have been. I'd come in, glance over, see that my mug was off to the side by itself... and it was easy to feel like I wasn't part of the team.

It just felt like... after all the serious problems there had to be dumb small ones too. Like not being able to enjoy Friends after long day of working on Microsoft Flight Sim. Everything had to be a problem, no matter how small the thing was. A coffee mug. A favorite TV show.

I don't think it helps to say we can share much worse experiences. Sexism or whatever this is doesn't go away because by comparison she had it easier than others. It's clear she felt undervalued in her team and that's a problem - especially in terms of how her productivity (may) have suffered. Microsoft should be working to reduce dumb stuff like this so everyone can work at their peak productivity - with the side-benefit of feeling camaraderie among their colleagues.

Personally I'd just go buy my own damn TV and watch alone in my office? :p

Maybe I don't have social skills either. :-)
Lots of males here providing shameful confirmation of the same thoughtless behavior the OP is calling out (finally after all these years). By focusing on specifics most commenters here seen to be missing the point that subtle marginalizing behaviors cause harm in unseen ways.
It quite funny how socialist American is. :)
You had a great point until you brought in psychiatric diagnoses.

I think this is an example of the conjunction fallacy, or The Linda Problem.

Bob walks in and changes the channel even though other people are watching.

Is Bob an asshole, or is Bob and asshole and has Asperger's?
I can't read the page but I was under the impression that recently someone found a problem with the DAO and then they put all DAO activity on hold until they could fix it. Perhaps someone is exploiting that problem or another one they found.
Terrorism and the emergence of Stand alone complex behavior
For all things fractal, join the http://www.fractalforums.com community!
The basic idea here is that complex data structures are usually easy to understand, while complex code isn't. This is one of the few fundamental insights about programming that withstood the test of time.

Note that while this all is not necessarily about types, this is about documenting the data structures - and good type systems enable you to do so in an unambiguous and even machine-checkable way.

1975: There's a famous quote in "The Mythical Man-Month" by Frederick Brooks:

Show me your flowcharts and conceal your tables,
and I shall continue to be mystified.
Show me your tables,
and I won’t usually need your flowcharts;
they’ll be obvious.

Note that this is old language from the 1970s, where "tables" roughly means "types definitions" (or comments describing the structure of input and output values, think of database table definitions) and flowcharts roughly means "function definitions" (think of hand-written flowcharts written next to low-level code to make all its GOTOs understandable).

1989: You can find a similar statement in "Notes on Programming in C" by Rob Pike:

Data dominates.
If you've chosen the right data structures and organized things well,
the algorithms will almost always be self­evident.
Data structures, not algorithms, are central to programming.

Note that Rob Pike refers directly to Frederick Brooks.

1995: Frederick Brooks reiterates this statement in the second edition of "The Mythical Man-Month" (20 years later).

2003: The same idea is also stated as one of the basic design rules in "The Art of Unix Programming" by Eric Raymond:

Rule of Representation:
Fold knowledge into data, so program logic can be stupid and robust.

Note that Eric Raymond refers directly to Rob Pike.

2006: Another quite famous quote from the Git mailing list by Linus Torvalds:

Bad programmers worry about the code.
Good programmers worry about data structures and their relationships.

And so on.

(BTW, does anyone know about a similar quote before 1975? Or a popular reformulation after 2006?)
Still nothing to do with gender.
Let's call it self delusion. A "lie" needs the intention to deceive. I think most developers of these systems truly believe that they are building the First Distributed Republic or something like that.
That's pretty awful.

Out of interest, what did the CEO do? Sounds like a pretty bold thing for the other employee to say in front of the CEO. What was the context? Could that employee have equally said something as vile to another man without repercussion?
I remember reading somewhere, that the DAO was basically hastly coded under pressure, without any QA or security audit, so that explains things
Nice UI.
Phonon framework also have a mobile UI and officially support Vue.js http://phonon.quarkdev.com/
My speaking about my cartesian knowledge of my own subject experience is proof (to me) that my subject experience has physical effects.

If there are any properties that do not have physical effects, that makes them unspeakable, unknowable, and unthinkable. We can have a conceptual category for these properties, but we can't place anything in that category, not even from our own subjective experiences.

Type A Categories (that we can place things in):

Physical Causes & Effects: Our reality.

No Physical Causes but Physical Effect: True randomness

Type B Categories (that we can talk about but not place anything in):

Physical Causes but no Physical Effects: The Afterlife, The Future, Non-physical Elements of Consciousness

Neither Physical Causes nor Physical Effects: Completely separate realities

If we say that anything from Type B categories exists, then existence becomes a meaninglessly broad category. We can be wrong about whether something is Type B (say if we discover time travel), but nothing that is Type B exists.
But the story doesn't tell us that anyone was actually watching Friends at the moment.
nothing to do with "mens clubs," if you were a guy who didn't like baseball I wouldn't be surprised if these guys treated you the same way.

Source: That was me.
I concur; I wish for a delta to be made more explicit as a non-normative section.

I added concise explanatory additions to the spec here: http://espadrine.github.io/New-In-A-Spec/es2016/.

Currently, the changes for ES2017 are the following: http://espadrine.github.io/New-In-A-Spec/es2017/.

File I/O means different things in different contexts. If implementing JS required a file system to be present, it would not be possible to implement a spec-compliant JS in some environments. But specs are already worked on elsewhere, such as the File API: https://w3c.github.io/FileAPI/. They obviously have very specific constraints, as the Web has a restrictive security model compared to downloaded executable binaries.

That said, some level of convergence with Node.js would be welcome, starting with the now fragmented module loading mechanisms: var f = require('file') vs. import * as f from 'file'.
@channel EMERGENCY ALERT! IF YOU HAVE A SPLIT OPEN PLEASE DM @griff ASAP!!!

azzo [2:22 PM]
what's DM
X86 Shellcode Obfuscation – Part 3: Execution Flow Deception
10 Best Earn money online 2016 – 2017 – Easy Rupee