skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
It's stress because you haven't adjusted to the situation. You have very quickly expanded your role but you are only part way to becoming manager at your current level. This is ok, the important thing is to recognize the problem and start working on what you still have to do to finish the transition.

Ask yourself, what it is that made your superiors put more responsibility in your hands. Find the capability that made you diffirent from your coworkers. Hold on to that, this is your differentiator. It's too easy to forget what is your differentiator when you advance quickly.

Recognize that you are now a manager and you are responsible for deciding what you are doing yourself and what you are delegating. If you are below VP level you will have to delegate almost everything even if you think you have to do it yourself. Try doing only one important thing each day. This important thing may be preparing speach, presentation, focusing on helping a project behind schedule, etc. Delegate everything else recognizing your limited time.

Recognize that, being a manager, your biggest responsibility is as enabler for your people. Empower your people, make them feel important, make them feel you trust them, and delegate things that are important and you may have hesitated delegating up to now. Hiring plans, work estimates, gap analyses, etc, do you think you have to do it all by yourself?

Find some management advice. As a fresh manager myself in very similar situation to yours (large part of organization and very important projects bestowed in very short time from my coming into organization) I like to listen to management audiobooks like Harvard Business Review and the likes. There is a lot of very good advice but the most important part is that you are actually aware what can go wrong in your current role so that you can recognize the problem and act on it before it becomes full blown disaster.

Most important, if you think something stresses you, stop and think. Don't let the stress overcome you, but spend on trying to understand what part of the task is stressing, why is it stressing and what could be done to remove stress. Don't let the downward spiral take you.
The Teamviewer account is required to access another computer without someone being there [1]. When you're helping a friend or demoing to a customer, they're there to start their teamviewer and give you the access code. There is no need for accounts if those are all your use cases and there is no risk to be attacked without an account, is that correct?

[1] https://www.teamviewer.com/en/help/410-what-is-a-teamviewer-...
How does SIP compare to Matrix? Are they even the same kind of thing?
Why don't you read other people's replies like that of lazzlazzlazz? You posted well after he posted his. Then you would not have to ask embarrassingly stupid rhetorical questions.
That would be so awesome. The current alternatives:

1. Use PhantomJS: It easy to script, but it lags over real browser by few years and development is stagnant. Many real website doesn't work in PhantomJS.

2. Use Chrome/Firefox xvfb. You have real browser, but scripting is hard. E.g. even hello world examples like make a thumbnail of a website takes a lot of time to get right.

According to some rumors, headless Chrome existed before even Chrome was released to the public. Google use it to do web scraping. However, though headless browsers are great for developers, they are also great for spammers and ad fraud. So the main developer likely has conflict of interests whether to invest resources into making headless Chrome public.
It just so happens that protecting you might fall under covering their ass. If it doesn't, watch out.
That sounds like the actual problem is the ongoing bloat of useless, unnecessary "features."
Stiegler (the German pilot) was exactly one shot down enemy machine away from getting the Knight's Cross. So that machine would have been easy prey - maybe too easy for his sense of honor?

I think it's interesting that he justified his action with his commander telling his men that shooting enemy pilots that have parachuted out of their machines is dishonorable, and that he essentially saw the almost defenseless machine with most of the crew killed in a comparable position.

There's a sense that technological abstraction makes warfare more evil, because people don't see each other anymore, and killing becomes even more abstract. That's even noticeable in non-war situations like car traffic, where people can become pretty aggressive behind the glass windows of their metal boxes. Even more obvious with drone strikes from a safe place halfway around the world. But for some reason those early days of airfight (probably more so in WW1 and less in WW2 though) convey this notion of "chivalry", which is somewhat counter-intuitive.

Maybe the common shared experience of having to deal with these complicated flying machines created this kind of respect for the other side?
The famed Ulfberht sword is believed to have used steel forged in northern Iran, and transported through the Volga trade route (that followed the Volga river into the Caspian sea):

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/ancient/volga-trade.html
What is the difference between deep learning and usual machine learning?
Avant Garde magazine: the digitized volumes
I was interested to find out why Condaleeza Rice's Free Speech was being restricted. Apparently the students didn't want to be associated with someone they consider an unconvicted war criminal:

http://m.startribune.com/don-t-give-condoleezza-rice-a-platf...

Which is a stance you can agree or disagree with, but seems irrelevant to whether they would be offended by what she said, or whether they needed further exposure to her ideas, and so including it in this article seems a bit of a stretch.

edited to add:

Thinking on this further it undermines the whole thesis, which appears to be "students shouldn't try to censor, as it gives aid to authoritarian regimes who want to censor".

Yet the example they give is students protesting a powerful, high-level member of government for involvement in what they believe to be illegal activities that resulted in millions of deaths. So surely by attacking that, they give aid to authoritarian regimes by their own argument?
RUSSIAN ESCORT ALISA – ESCORTS DIRECTORY ESCORTGREECE.GR
I guess in today's kind of warfare you would have to send them a letter that they have been spared from a strike.
I wonder what the probability is of the alias system expanding to Turing-completeness.
Then your definition of 10x doesn't apply to a software engineer either. What measurable metric does a "10x developer" outperform the average developer in?
I have just read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World... that was very different from what my teacher said. For him, germans were far more effective than uk in bombing war production factories and uk was getting short of airplanes. Churchill has decided to focus more on german towns, causing the retaliation on London bombing. According to him, this plan has been a total success, uk was able to rebuild its war production factories and to catch up with Germany.

As history is always rewrote by winner, I was not able to confirm this story.
Simbe Robotics | San Francisco, CA | On-site

Simbe Robotics is currently hiring for a number of robotics-focused engineering roles in the San Francisco Bay Area.

At Simbe, we are automating brick & mortar retail through the use of mobile robots, computer vision, and cloud-based software. Our first product, Tally, provides retailers unprecedented visibility and insights into the state of their stores. Tally in action: https://vimeo.com/145242961

Current open positions include:

* Computer Vision Software Engineer

* Dev Ops Engineer

* Full Stack Web Software Engineer

* Robotics Software Engineer

* Robotics Research Intern

Apply:
https://jobs.lever.co/simberobotics.com
Drone footage: the architecture of apartheid in Cape Town
Not quite the same as a minimum wage. It's not enforced by bureaucrats, but by potential employees each individually deciding they have better uses for their time to do the work you're asking for the price you're offering.

If your workers are willing and able to do twice as much work in the same time for twice as much pay, you should likely make that switch anyway - at the least it'd save you bookkeeping, and it would be a better use of the workers' time.

And if people systematically decide that they have better things to do than a particular job, and we automate that job so we don't need people doing it, that seems like a win to me.

Whether it means less people working overall depends on how big these effects are, what the effects are on demand, and whether we couple it with other changes like a decreased minimum wage (which could lead to more people working on things which are more pleasant/fulfilling but less highly paid).
> However, giving you the benefit of the doubt

I appreciate that.

> There tens of thousands of programmers out there (myself included) who write software to analyze data. We don't make "apps" for users, and we don't download random PDFs or MP3s for input. Your view is so limited, you can't even imagine software that isn't a product or a tool for advertising, but trust me - a lot of software is written in other environments, and malicious users or malicious data is not a real concern.

Ahh. It's funny - you think I can't think of all the software where security isn't an issue, and I think you can't think of all the software where security is an issue.

I'm aware that there is software where, rightly, security isn't a huge concern. It exists. Some software for crunching data internally counts! And some software is written where the front door is wide open anyways. But the scope for software where security isn't a concern sure as shit isn't "everything but public facing servers or web browsers", as I took you to imply. It's also not "everything but products and advertising tools". Point of sales systems, industrial control software, internal financial software, routers, telecom infrastructure... all kinds of wonderful "internal", bespoke systems, that most definitely need to care about security and protection against malicious users, or malicious employees. Industries where mandatory vacations are a security policy against fraud, where your software will be generating audit logs, where defense in depth matters against external threats even if you could trust your employees.

Which are just chock full of C programs. Sigh.

> I'm not interested in continuing this discussion.

Fair enough. Thank you for taking the time you did.

> Look, you're just another arrogant novice who runs around telling people how to be safe

Yeah, probably. Not so arrogant as to be certain I can think of every reason my software might actually need to care about security, or to try and write security critical C in good conscious, though.

> so you can convince yourself that you're safe.

I'd never succeed at that. Safer, maybe, but never safe.

> Maybe you'll grow out of that, or maybe you'll stay obnoxious forever.

For the sake of progress and a safer future, let's hope for the latter.
It took them an hour to figure out that their connectivity issues were caused by losing power to an entire Availability Zone? Maybe they should add an alert for "AZ has no power" or put it on a dashboard...

I'm joking of course, but that's what ran through my mind while reading that timeline.
Money in bank accounts is not like acorns, it's more like having other squirrels owe you acorns. I don't see why that is such a big deal.

People working 60 hour weeks has less to do with the Cayman islands than with those people needing a place to stay, and the demand of land far outstripping the supply, making it a zero sum game. That's why a huge land tax is a no brainer, but of course it will never happen, because the land owners can always pull out the old "poor granny won't afford to stay in her own house" argument and get all the sympathies on their side.
A neural Network is specializing in one particular problem set? You can not create Meta-Neural networks that reconnect the specialized Networks or grow new ones?
You might want to re-read dang's (he's a moderator btw) comment to you here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11839799

You don't need that last sentence.
Do you honestly believe snapchat actually deletes content? Please.
no, it's not. I actually enjoyed working with React ES5 "classes" more than ES6 (but I had to switch cause of work standards)
Still having issues with accessing apps hosted on Elastic Beanstalk on AP-SOUTHEAST-2 Region. Restarting app servers / rebuilding the environment doesn't make a difference.
> all browser reports metric around the 96dpi magic number

Why do they do that?
This problem has been solved fairly well with internal adapter products such as the Indivision AGA MK2:

http://www.vesalia.de/e_indivisionagamk2.htm

I have one on my A1200, and it gives me a cool 1280x1024 via DVI on a standard LCD monitor.
The thing is, in a service based economy we desperately need the rich to buy ostentatious, pointless shit/experiences purely in order to retain jobs.
Wasn't quite that simple. I lost connectivity to instances that did not reboot so I'm guessing it took out some network elements.
That's actually a cool application of VR/AR that I haven't heard of before -- having your GUIs on a 'virtual steadicam', which should (in theory) have a similar effect to looking out the window, while allowing people to get work done.
God, if there was ever a need for use of an appendix on the internet, this article would be it.

Really didn't need to see 90% of the images. The article was so verbose, too, taking ten pages to conclude a simple arithmetic count of cities and road shields.

Didn't help that on my screen the content/white distribution was literally 30/70, like I'm running a mobile phone simulator on my laptop spent a minute in the CSS to change it.

Anyway this was a great first pass, although it feels to me like the least interesting. Why? Because maps start to really make or break as a utility tool, once you introduce some kind of goal, which has some level of interaction, configuration and changes to the map.

For example, search (say by voice) for Starbucks and everything pops up. The notion that Starbucks didn't show on the default map view at the default zoom, is pretty meaningless. Or pick a location and then press 'navigate', and relevant roads and shields pop up. The notion immediately prior to this interaction all roads and shields they weren't sprinkled all across the map in all directions, isn't really important.

But none of that functionality was examined, which is THE driving force between differences in maps for actual human beings with actual human being purposes.

Anyway I'm sure it'll get covered in the future, but I felt it to be a surprisingly weak article. Let's not forget this isn't just some random guy writing an essay, this is one of the leads of the Apple Maps cartography for almost half a decade.

I think one thing went missing too in the focus on two of the biggest anglo-saxan cities in the world and the backyard of Apple/Google, which is that the world's population doesn't live there, and that Apple sucks and Google functions in less Western areas. Just read this thread and you'll find lots of anecdotal evidence.
I was surprised by the same realization!

"By appearing in our featured clients section, ICQ proved it's still in business"

Now that's a success story!
Visual Basic still works fine. Doesn't mean it's a practical solution to building stuff.
And it isn't completely broken with javascript disabled, good job who ever made that website.
Theres a guy publishing yt vids about his installations of this nature

https://youtu.be/9Qlmywxjau0

The attention to detail, I find the details fascinating. He's a really bright guy but designing the protocol, making software so that the creative agency can program the lighting without him in the loop, writing firmware that protects the installation from damage even if they're ham fisted with the lighting sequence they design etc etc
1. This is ubiquitous among chat apps.
2. This is not likely to remain the case for long, among rumors Messenger is adding end-to-end encryption.
3. There is no evidence they analyze messages for ads. Zero. All attempts to prove this have been disproven.
4. This is not an argument.
That would be a great solution, although I think the consequence for the tax havens would be the opposite of what you envision.

>The irony being that most evaders' ancestors were the ones building penal colonies to send their debtors to.

Difference is that those debt obligations were voluntarily assumed, whereas tax debt is an odd form of debt that is imposed on someone without their agreement.
Ramadan Shopping Be Like Vine by Rahim Desi Pardesi
The World is a bit bigger than u think...
As a third party to this discussion, you really need to check your attitude and up the charity a few notches. I was finding the conversation interesting but for wading past all the time you spent typing while avoiding communicating.
Laughed way too hard at the code suggestion. Fantastic write up.
Genuinely shocking that Facebook allows such an easy loophole undetected. Or maybe they know it.
That sounds even worse. Why should primitive types be treated as second-class entities that can only arise as private implementation details of a class?

In any case, my original point still stands:

(0) Dimension errors are really what one seeks to prevent by discouraging things like `double meters;`.

(1) Making a separate class for each unit of measurement doesn't compose or scale well. Dimensional analysis is a fundamentally structural business, and this really calls for compile-time arithmetic with the exponents of primitive dimensions. But, of course, if your hammer is Java-shaped...
The access code is probably generated server-side and can be snooped.
I recommend "Britain's War Machine" by David Edgerton. Prior to hostilities Britain had an inferior military in many regards (but many superior tanks, ships and planes) but her manufacturing and resources available from Empire far exceeded those of Germany. It didn't take that long to get war production going, and by most measures of armament production Britain had overtaken Germany by 1941. It's a while since I read the book but it was quite eye opening to me too see the stats on how powerful Britain was when going into the Second World War. The story of the plucky underdog is a myth.
Driver Genius 16.0.0.241 Crack Full License Code
Not really, but here's what I've just made on my phone in five minutes (don't think of it as of a "serious" presentation, I just wanted to show how exported slides look like):

http://www.slideshare.net/SergeZaitsev/slide-201606051659

The raw PDF is available on Google Drive - https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bztexa2TJWdcdlZXRk1MSTVoNj...

The text I typed on my phone to make this presentation is:

#SLIDE

#make a presentation
(even if you got no time to make one)

content *is* important

#Takahashi
#method

• short text
• big font
• many slides

@http://www.magic4walls.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/two-lines-between-black-and-white-circles-minimalism-wallpaper.jpg 140% top
minimal

#opensource
http://github/trikita/slide

#Feedback
#appreciated!

The theme is the default white-on-black theme.
> Marx didn’t say much use­ful about how to fix the prob­lem

Nor did he intend to say much. He famously said "I don't write recipes for the kitchens of the future". He gave advice to organizers in his day, and left the future for those in the future, with the material conditions and relations of production they would have.

> there isn’t a pro­le­tari­at any more

In the world of 1867, the proletariat was rather small. The world just shifted from majority rural to majority urban/suburban a few years ago. The proletariat is larger than it ever was. You can argue if it will ever be a vanguard revolutionary class or not, but it has not disappeared.

One point Marx and Engels made is the world has seen several economic systems over the past 10,000 years - primitive communism, slavery, feudalism and capitalism. The last three systems all collapsed under the weight of their own contradictions. Marx and Engels believed capitalism would run its course and eventually collapse under the weight of its own contradictions just like the previous economic systems. Capitalism has only become predominant relatively recently historically.
Why it is necessary evil ? You don't live alone in this world and I bet you profited enormously from the country, community that you live in.
Those codes don't always reset, or at least they didn't use to, so it is possible they got leaked.
To approximate 52! by hand, compute 54! and divide by 3000
The myth of the well-rounded student? It’s better to be ‘T-shaped’
Automatic laundry folding
Take care with your ideology(for you it's seems it's a religion), that's all I can say to you.
Interesting piece. There's so much broken in the world.

We don't inhabit a true Capitalist society any more ( my term for the current system is Crapitalism )

Further it is unclear if our current machine can survive

* peak stuff ( we don't need to consume as much any more ) why would companies invest in new jobs and infrastructure when they are not going to recoup the cost through growing sales ?

* population still on the rise . Where do jobs come from for 10 billion when we've hit peak stuff

* robber barons control the laws, courts and media ( a constant over human existence)

* massive debt load ( unfunded pensions, national debts, private mortgage debts )

But I would ask Tim Bray what I ask everyone else who says radical measures are required.
Namely, how is the transition made without mass cleansing and warfare in the interim.

Often ( Viet Cong, Khmer Rouge, Mao, Stalin ) the middle class and educated are unfairly lumped in with the elite and exterminated.

Is the current brokenness worth millions dead, and proportionally lots of HNers ?
Probably using Keynote instead of PowerPoint. While Keynote can export to PPT, the result is not satisfactory. Usually Keynote presentations are exported as PDF instead.
fddffdddfffddfdffddfdfddffdfdfddfdfdfddffdfdfdfddfffddffddddffdfd
ffddfdfdddffddffddfffdddffdd
> Linux and OSX don't use /bin/sh as the default shell.

You didn't even read the first sentence of the first hyperlinked page.
In Microsoft's case they just wanted more apps to flaunt at the next event to display how their Store is growing now.

Same shit as forcing upgrades with dark patterns and silently changing things so Windows 10 can be a success on powerpoint slides.
Looks interessting, but I don't like those large IDEs and the image philosophy neither. So for example I use vim instead of eclipse and I really like the golang tooling, because it is quite simple to use from a shell.

What I like about Smalltalk is the language and how it is build on very few principles. The IDEs integrate well with the language but not with the system around them and have a lot of overhead :-/
At least your scenario has a guy with a gun in his sights. "We don't do body counts" type attitudes seem to reign supreme.
UBI will just cause rents to go up. Rents in attractive locations are always as high as most tenants living there can afford. If you give people 1000$, rents for the poorest will just go up by up to $1000. Property prices will follow swiftly.

The only force working in opposite direction would be that some people will be able not to flock to attractive locations but I don't think it'll be enough to counter the obvious raise.

You'd have to tax property progressively and accept the drop in property price associated with it being less attractive for people who buy to rent. Apparently property prices are sort of holly cow in US so no-one in their right mind can afford doing anything that would harm that, even it it meant actually ending the poverty.
I'm pretty 'religious' about not violating people's human rights. I think we have a moral duty to speak our minds when we perceive an injustice being done, and we should not shirk from our duty out of fear of social rejection.