skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think HttpOnly can help in case when you serve untrusted HTML on your site, but in a different origin. For example, you may have cookie for *.example.com and uploads.example.com serves user uploaded content.

Correct me if this is exploitable. (I haven't done this myself, but I've seen this in a wild).
It's not that FB isn't cool. Facebook is something for people who have established identities. It's not a place where you can experiment with different identities. Young people have FB accounts, but they don't spend much time there b/c youth is the time you have to establish an identity of your own.
But in this case, it sounds like indie.vc gets the equity kicker as well at a liquidity event.

The covenants could be a big difference. Surprised that Indie.vc doesn't have any.
I'm delighted this is moving forward and that the pilot program will be in Oakland! I lived in a cooperative house there years ago and experienced the sharp contrasts in wealth.

See also:

The One-Minute Case for a Basic Income - http://www.basicincome.org/news/2013/02/opinion-the-one-minu...

A flyer of the same: http://hypertexthero.com/work/basic-income-11-arguments/
In this case, that's actually not true. It's being defined by the European Commission and imposed on these sites.
I agree in general, I just don't think it's a good enough proxy in this case.
Velocity: decentralized derivatives built on Ethereum
Google's huge investment in AI. You'll be hearing a lot more of it in the future :-)

("Do you REALLY want to use that API? I think you should space your comments out a bit more. Hey, your battery is getting low! BTW, I've just emailed your entire source base to Google for assimilation.")
If you clicked on any hyperlink from that email then you can consider yourself to be phished. You do not know what they wanted - was it your google account? Or something else? You don't know, the only way to keep yourself safe is to change all of your passwords.
This is easily solved by making the personal standard deduction higher than the UBI.

So your first $10k (from BI) would be tax free. If you don't work, you don't pay any taxes.

Let's say you have a part-time job which pays $20k a year and the lowest marginal tax rate is 30%. You'd then pay $6k in taxes on that $20k.

Thus, your overall income would be $24k, much more than you got from just BI. This works if your only work is a single $100 lawn mowing job. BI, when coupled with an adequate standard deduction, eliminates disincentives to work.
I don't think FP will necessarily translate into increased readability.

That depends on proper code organization, identifiers, formatting, documentation, coupling, good practices in general.
That's true, but it doesn't sound too different. Are you saying that this money is not "just a loan," that can be paid off at liquidity or through monthly cash.

$10k/mo is very small for a loan. Does that mean that indie.vc has some other way of doing diligence? That's the main reason the bank won't lend to such a small company.
How about mental health?

It seems that a large portion of the very poor / homeless is caused not directly by poverty, but indirectly by poor decisions caused by mental health issues.

Obviously BI is not a fix for the health care system, but how do you propose that BI should address people that don't really have "legal capacity" to make decisions on their own ? Do you support paying BI to some dedicated caregiver instead in such cases, or is it beyond the scope of this initial experiment?
For those who check the comments first: Not clickbait. Title is literally accurate.
What do you do to keep your GPG keys safe (i.e. so you don't accidentally lose them)?
Comprehensively Monitor Your Enterprise Stack with VROps Management Packs
Formal Causes, Teleology, and Computation in Nature
Drupal SQLi (Drupalgeddon) Attack Trend CVE-2014-3704 / SA-CORE-2014-005
Could you be a bit more specific? As I understand it, "evangelical" just means the church tries to get more members (i.e. evangelizing)

...which describes pretty much all of them.

What's the difference?
Could you please try to be more consistent about which of your two accounts - ryanlol vs. ryanl0l - you use for your replies here? Keeping up with one is tedious enough.
From the perspective of trying to crack a single user's account the salt does not slow down non-precomputed attacks at all. From the perspective of trying to crack the entire database, or a significant portion of it, it multiples the work required by N (where N is the desired number of cracks to perform).
Our friend is so jarringly good at Set and Scrabble that nobody will play with her anymore. She has to play people on the internet and they frequently disconnect mid-match.
When you say:

> Our next goal is a website to show errors in OSM data to be corrected

Do you mean feeding the data to one of the existing projects that crowdsource fixes based on lists of potential errors, or a new custom site?
> I really do hope this will work to stop the propagation of hate speech at least a bit, otherwise several countries will be governed by neonazis in a few years, and even the EU itself might break. This is serious.

That's hilarious. You basically said "People who don't have the right opinions should go to jail!". Maybe if your governments had attempted to explain why the far-right is wrong instead of suppressing them, they would have been less radical. You can't just sweep the thoughts and emotions of your people under the rug, even (especially) if they are unpalatable to you, and hell, to me as well.
The primary source (of Tumblr confirming the leak) wasn't linked from the article (Tumblr Staff Blog, May 12th 2016): https://staff.tumblr.com/post/144263069415
I presume people from those companies, for the most part, went on to build (together) similar stuff in bigger companies like Google once their initial companies folded.
Mirroring NPM creates a nonDRY context in the network context. Perhaps it makes the software engineering tradeoffs of DRY versus nonDRY in source code explicit: availability versus consistency versus partition.

Repeating the same code in two files/modules/functions/blocks facilitates diverging independent development directions over time. A possible benefit if it turns out the business logic needs to be less similar than I thought originally to handle the two cases: in a building the shared logic of toilet rooms and kitchens is of less importance than the divergent logic of eating versus shitting, even though each is captured by a bubble on the initial space diagram and connected to waste, water, hvac, and electrical systems in the instantiation.

As a strategy, solving padleft type via generalized copying makes package management partition tolerant and available. It comes with the security problems of delayed patching, i.e. CAP's consistency.

TANSTAAFL.
There is no supported 64 bit kernel yet, though.
> Feeding someone on $3/day sounds somewhat challenging to me

It seems pretty easy to me. $3 buys 24 chicken eggs, or 10 servings of Quaker Oats.
White House made me a poster child for beating the odds. Then I dropped out
Thanks for the detailed response (and link to installing without systemd!)
Sure, and that's the general idea I got too. My response was really meant to outline that there wasn't much concrete to discuss there, but I think there could be. For example, are we using bad as synonymous for illegal, or are we extending it to include non-illegal but generally frowned upon (at least the those that frequent here) behavior, such as issues to do with privacy or strong-arm tactics? Additionally, to cut through the media and perception of behavior, it would be interesting to explore what percentage of the company, by employee count, division, revenue or profit, has been party to the bad behavior we're talking about, and how high in the company structure were they?

Put another way, I think they are definitely very interesting to look at, but I'm not sure whether they are as relevant to look at in a discussion about bad corporate behavior without exploring some of these topics. As such, I'm just doing my best to try to entice people into what I think is a more interesting conversation in this sub-thread. :)
Not a bad idea but probably a tough sell in June. Forecast high temperature of 115F this week. Which translates to 125F+ at ground level in the parking lot where you have to walk to your car.
Well among gamers it was definitely embarrassing to be a PC user. Doom made it cool.

Arcades had Street Fighter and all the action. Consoles had the most faithful arcade ports as well as all the JRPGs. Amiga/ST had the better sound, less configuration hassles, and for a while, better graphics.

PCs had...flight simulators and spreadsheets and yuck, MS DOS.
As an interviewee, you need to be asking these kinds of questions.

• Will this function get only strings, or other stuff too?

• Do punctuation and capitalization count?

• Are there any special cases I should worry about?
Any BI advocate who pretends that BI won't require increased taxes is basically deluded.

Of course BI will require increasing marginal taxes on the people who work. This shouldn't be economically catastrophic though, because you can structure the system such that there aren't disincentives to work and the UBI everyone receives is tax-free.
Our current social safety net doesn't handle sudden emergencies. People blow their entire general assistance and/or food stamps budget in a few days all the time. There are already not enough shelter beds to handle the homeless population in most major cities. BI wouldn't make any of this worse than it already is.
We want to share as much as we can throughout the process, but protecting participants and the integrity of the study are our first priorities.
"Personally, I'd hope the system would absolutely tell them "tough shit". There's got to be a line where the safety net gives out, because someone is too expensive to help."

But see, that's why his is a trick question ...

If the answer is "tough shit" then it's a concession that implementing BI (or anything like it) is simply adjusting the "tough shit dial" to a relatively different value. There's still a benefits ceiling, beyond which it's "tough shit".

At that point it becomes difficult to justify any particular point on the tough shit dial - especially when todays tough shit was, four generations ago, essentially heaven on earth.

No benefits at all is a rational position. Endless benefits, cradle to grave is also a rational position. Neither of them are self-contradictory or loony. You may disagree with either of them but neither of them are crazy.

It's all of the bullshit in-between that is totally unworkable - both practically and theoretically. His question - and your answer - illustrate that very well.
Yeah the timing is interesting. Given the close release dates, I don't think there'd have been time for one to inspire the other, yet now we have both. Are there any other services like this? Maybe it's a new trend.
I always want to type a library or function in and get example code. be interesting to have it connected to scripts. like "is x123 server up?" runs a script gets an answer.
Wonderful piece; what I like is that I remember this game being taught to me by the mathematics professors at my school, and I enjoyed the game but didn't ask any deeper questions about the game, such as its mathematical properties. Now here I see this way of looking at the game, perhaps even the reason for its existence, and it's like rediscovering an old friend.
To be fair, this is the only one of his suits against Gawker that he's disclosed having funded, so it's quite difficult to judge their overall merits.
To me it seemed implied that Javascript was required for other reasons anyway, when the parent said "started working on single-page/client-side applications".

At least, that's typically part of how I parse it when people refer to a site as an SPA.
What is the difference between Hate Speech and Newspeak? When do we cross over the line from good intentions to thoughtcrime? Is the best way to end racial, religious, or sexual discrimination to hide it or to lambaste those who would propagate it?
Why is the underlying assumption always "as technology continues to replace jobs and generate massive wealth" in the world of BI? It seems like BI is an answer to a false dichotomy.

What if we fix our society instead? What if instead of massive seeking of profiteering we actually double down on our efforts to improve lives today, right now in this very moment instead of some far distant realization of "when all jobs are automated" which is a highly debatable premise, and if even true, a long ways away.

That's the thing that is so frustrating to me about my fellow people in tech. Driven to automate. Why? To what end? If you stop and think who really benefits the most from this endless pursuit to automate, you will see it really isn't your common neighbor.

I will say I feel this way with most fields of research and schools of political thought as well. So much is being done for theoretical problems in the distant future, when we could double down on current issues. Instead we fund obscure research that may or may not reach fruition, or the underlying assumptions might change under this hope that some future results will solve our current problems, meanwhile the status quo remains for those suffering now. And you wonder why people are becoming increasingly weary with science, and even technology.

Technology was suppose to make people happier and have endless opportunities, yet it is becoming increasingly obvious society is even more unhappy, more anti-social, more fragmented than ever before. More people are unhappier than ever before, more people are committing suicide, more people are addicted to pain killers and opioids than ever before, more people are addicts in general. Sure we are living longer, long enough to stuff our faces with all the processed junk our wonderful technology has created so cheaply, but we have missed out on the meaning, I am afraid.

Maybe I have just become so cynical I can't work in tech anymore.

What can I say though. It pays good.
Dating the ginormous MySpace breach
ACH's around the nation are in love with this idea.
Letter of the law vs. spirit of the law.
The biggest difference I've seen in my career:

- OOP code is usually separated and organized by the principal data it operates on, i.e. the instance of a class, and more specifically the instance's fields.

- FP code is usually separated and organized by the more abstract or philosophical responsibility of the functions, and they may not always share the same arguments.
script gives you the whole console, including output and control characters. It's a useful tool but might be a little overkill for keeping track of what commands you have run.
Infrastructure isn't a free market. If it were, there would be a hundred different cable lines hanging outside your house, like what happened in the 1800's.

So, in order to prevent that situation, we allow one company a monopoly on the market. In exchange, that company is forced to follow common carrier rules, such as not interfering with speech.
No, they are often present in properties where the tenants have had trouble paying the bills in the past for whatever reason. As I understand it, they are very difficult to get rid of even for new occupants.

The electricity supplier gets more for the same electricity at no risk. Thats not actually stupid.. but in my opinion, it is in some way evil.
I agree with you that these are private companies which can, rightfully, facilitate or inhibit conversation or speech in anyway they desire: I wouldn't have it any other way. And I don't agree with the leanings of Facebook & Twitter management.

Having said that, their right to exercise editorial controls on their platforms does not mean they are somehow above criticism when they elect to do so in stupid ways. As the original comment in this thread suggested their moves in regard to speech are short-sighted and detrimental to the overall health of society, especially given the pervasiveness of use of these platforms. Still, I can recognize their right, and call them out on their foolishness, at the same time. I only cross the line when I demand force to be used against them (meaning a law written to force their hands); then I would be in the wrong. They don't have a responsibility to further discourse and I don't have a responsibility to hold my tongue when they fail in this regard.
Yeah, understanding the other side is difficult.

I'll try to explain the other side, but it probably won't make sense to you. (as your side makes no sense to me) The trouble is that people can have fundamentally different value systems, priorities, and fears.

Maybe the best way to explain it is to say how you appear to the other side. I'm sure you will disagree, which is kind of the point.

You look kind of naïve and childish. You appear to believe in some utopian fantasy where all people are good and have or can be converted to a value system that is like your own, with the possible exception of conservatives. You fail to make any effort to protect your nation and culture from being overrun by the brutish, violent, and lazy. You somehow imagine that people from places like Syria and Mexico make better neighbors than many of the conservative people in your own country. Basically, your views fail at self-preservation. You are in denial of the historic fact that every nation is built upon a hill of skulls, and the fact that this is the natural way of nature. You imagine that you can refuse to pile up skulls without becoming part of the pile.

If your world were real, I'd rather live in it. I'm not going to deny reality just because I don't like it. Conflict is eternal. I prefer that my people win.

It's actually unethical to avoid the conflict. You're ceding ground to the enemy. You let down your descendants, friends, and neighbors. They will be impovershed, killed, and -- as we've seen with ISIS -- enslaved. This shit really happens. It may take decades or even centuries, but every bit of inaction and appeasement brings that day closer.

For some reason, you push risk and long-term bad consequences out of your mind. It's like you can't see them. You focus on the positive only, kind of like a gambler.

Your optimism probably makes you a happier person. :-)
How Did L.A. Become a City of Palms?
I agree with you on all points.

Regarding side effects, it might even be possible to create almost-side-effect-free server code; but the state of most native client frameworks are just not ready for this. State can be banished/abstracted into the lower levels, but it doesn't go away.

(Speaking as an iOS dev. There is React Native, but this only handles the view layer; good luck with stateless CoreData)
"tough shit" sucks when your parents blow all their regular income, and their foodstamps, and still leave their children in poverty.

what part of the fact that money was handed out changes things?
"...We have almost no aligned interests..." So if you buy the story that effectively, T.E. Lawrence installed the House of Saud, then we have the interest of maintaining the Former British Empire. S.A. is also parked on both Mecca and Medina. We also have an interest in an ally, no matter how ... dissonant ... in that spot.

"... and very different views on human rights and Wahhabism..."

With maximum snark - celebrate the cultural diversity. One of the most interesting features of nation-state-dom is that we can smile and ignore all that. Er, right until Wahabbism runs smack up into our Security Industrial Complex.
Dave Ramsey always says, and I'm paraphrasing, "Someones financial health is 80% behavior and 20% circumstances.
Influentially speaking, they are. Israel has zero influence on neighbours except for threats of nuclear war. The Egyptian government is currently seen as illegitimate pretty much everywhere. Turkey leverages its geopolitical position towards Europe and Russia, but Erdogan has few friends left and might well end up like Mubarak in the long run.

For good or bad, the combo of economic and religious power Saudis can swing is pretty unmatched in the region at the moment -- their only counterweight being, potentially, an Iranian state with smart people at the wheel for more than a few token years.
Ok they are down and I did read the announcement.

How does this compare to c9.io?
Not liking something that has women in it is not the same as not liking something because it has women in it, but thank you for trying to tell me what I'm thinking.

For example: Not liking a gathering of wives of KKK members is not the same as not liking all women.
I'd seen the syntax before never realized it had a name.
I think the issue is not that mafribe misuses "lambda calculus". I think the issue is that you missed mafribe's use of the word "paradigm".

Two programming paradigms may be both Turing complete (and therefore formally equivalent to each other), but the paradigms may still be quite different. Yes, at the level of lambda calculus structured programming and functional programming and OO are all equivalent. That doesn't make structured programming into functional programming, though. As paradigms, they are radically different.
"But it's a dry heat"
I'm assuming it's simple common sense. After all, a Boltzmann brain is always a possibility.
This "license-free" text is a lot of needless confusion that will only serve to complicate anyone's life who needs to show this to a lawyer.

The project could avoid the term "license free" and follow the guidelines for applying CC0 here for example:
https://wiki.creativecommons.org/wiki/CC0_FAQ#How_do_I_apply...

The CC0 dedication itself is available in summary form
https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ and full legal form https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/legalcode

CC0's full legal form includes a "fallback license" in jurisdictions where public domain isn't permitted.

A piece of software can be public domain (which does mean you don't need a license to use/modify/redistribute it), or it can have a permissive license, or a choice of multiple licenses.

If "license free" means public domain, use the proper term, and use the suggested text from CC0 (written with a lawyer's help).

If "license free" means there's a choice of licenses, then offer a choice of licenses.

If something is not public domain, then "there is no license" normally means the default license, which is "all rights reserved" - everything is prohibited. For that reason, the term "license free" kind of implies the opposite of what this project intends.

Don't reinvent the legal wheel... especially when the CC0 dedication is already the exact thing you want to say.
The current US Secretary of the Treasury is the most influential member of the IMF, with 16.66% of the total voting power (Jacob Lew) [1]. He was promoted to his current posts shortly after banking on the 2008 economic collapse with Citi.

[1]https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/memdir/members.aspx#3
Box.com is having issues
> If not, then what are they doing and how can we fix or eliminate them?

That's part of the problem. Government programs don't need to fix or eliminate problems. Once they've been launched, it's virtually impossible to get rid of them. We're stuck with the War On Drugs, the TSA, ethanol subsidies, and on and on and on.

Fixing bad programs is very difficult, and once we've set something in motion, even if it was a really bad idea, it's all but impossible to pull it back.

EDIT: freudian slip - I typed "government problems" in my first para, where I should have written (and have changed to) "government programs".
Tails USB coming with a keyboard.
That assumes a fixed supply of housing, which is only true in deeply dysfunctional places like SF. In most of the US, housing cost is close to replacement cost, so if landlords try to raise rents, people can just move someplace cheaper, especially since they are no longer dependent on a job to support themselves.
The conclusion seems to be foregone: We think everyone should have enough money to meet their basic needs—no matter what