skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
>However, I have yet to see a doctor that knows anything about metabolic pathways and such.

You have to keep in mind that the vast majority of psych-related clinicians are average to below-average performers that were too incompetent to become real doctors. That would explain why your "doctor" doesn't understand anything taught in a basic undergrad neuroscience survey course.

It's like expecting an auto mechanic to design a new car engine - sure, they could try their best, but at the end of the day, they're still an auto mechanic, not an engineer.
Demagogues will always find fertile ground when bashing the EU. It's been a long time since anyone has come out and defended it in a positivist way e.g. guarantor of democracy, free movement of labor, etc.

In the current British debate leading up to the referendum, major campaigners in the 'Stay In' campaign rarely defend the EU, and rather take the line that the UK should stay in the EU despite all it's problems.

What was the turnout at the referendum in the Netherlands?
Study monitors programmers' stress levels to predict the quality of their code
Really? I have seen it everywhere I have been - Bangalore, Chennai, Delhi, Hyderabad, Mumbai, Coimbatore, Kolkatta.
Alternative title: Guy forgets laptop at security checkout and blames TSA for his stupidity.

> I emerged from the scanner without any problems, collected my 2 bags and incidentals, and proceeded into Terminal 5. After awhile, I looked into my backpack and realized that I didn’t have my computer. My heart skipped a beat! I turned around and rushed to the security area.
The article has a link to "the report" but is merely a link to the website of "The Natanional Academies of SCIENCES, ENGINEERING and MEDICINE". The actual report is not public: you must pay USD 71.
The "Who are we" button on the website is vague: Each report is produced by a committee of experts selected by the Academies to address a particular statement of task.

I want to be able to verify if this report is made by independant individuals, but cannot.

Mark Lymas, the author, does not say anything about the content of the report... nothing is said about evidence. This article is not worth reading.
The appeal of the far right, as with the far left is that they're not the "Establishment"

The so called "centre" has moved away from trying to craft balanced policy without leaning too far one way or the other and have instead chosen simply to serve the hopes and dreams of the political and business elite. They do not represent the left, or the right. They represent a new point on the political spectrum that I see as the new aristocracy.

The racists and facists have always been there. But now that both sides of the political spectrum are rejecting the centre by backing new political movements, they've found a new voice and we can hear them again.
I think you could get the source somehow, but maybe it wasn't on github?

Only has 90 stars ATM which seems odd if it has been up here for a while.
People can be anti-immigration and not racist.
Technology as in those who understand and can work with technology benefit from it. The rest are left behind so to speak.
I cannot speak for right wing parties in general, but "Dansk Folkeparti" is very much like social democrats on paper, but their votes reveal a different, right-leaning agenda (to the detriment of a big portion of their voters who are voting for someone to take care of the "little people").
Because it's really, and I mean REALLY hard to teach the computer to create stylised illustrations from a 3d scene. Even harder, to actually animate the scene geometry in a way that corresponds to what a human animator would draw. Think to one of the core principles of animation - squash and stretch. Every character is more or less a soft body that deforms in a volume-preserving way to add emphasis to movement and intent and that's a really important artistic element of animation.

For example, just watch an old Tom&Jerry short and try to imagine how you'd represent these characters as 3d geometry. How would the animator move and deform them? How do you do the effect where Tom is hit with a shovel in the face and turns into a table? With hand-draw animation (either digital or on paper) you are just drawing the final result, but with 3d animation you have to describe the actual physical geometry in the scene.
I'm always surprised that people don't try harder to personalize their laptops. MacBooks all look alike. I put a sticker with my name on it, which has come in handy when in a room with ten other Airs lying about.
I thought it was a good question.

"Do people in China in general care enough about censorship to pay for access to uncensored internet?" doesn't have an explicitly obvious answer, does it?

They could be happy with their internet as is. They could be unhappy and willing to pay. They could be unhappy but unwilling/unable to pay.
Further down the article:

> After a few minutes, he found me coming through the security line, and sure enough, my computer was not with my bags when I retrieved my belongings. Moving further back in time, we watched as a TSA agent pulled my computer off of the belt as soon as it came out of the machine—there is an area where agents can remove things from the belt before passengers have access to belongings. He moved my computer to a holding area immediately behind the x-ray machine. And then, we watched as the computer was inspected, after which it was handed back… to a random woman. The woman took my computer and left the security area.
> The USSR was conservative socially and nationalistic.

The USSR was the opposite of conservative - they were extremely progressive. In the attempt to make a new man, they tried to crush all conservative values such as religion, family (with children encouraged to denuonce their parents) or sexual restraint (free love, contraception and abortion were allowed in USSR decades before the West's sexual revolution).

As for it being nationalistic - the USSR was itself a conglomerate of 15 nation states, where any nationalistic claims about for example freedom for Ukraine or Georgia were obviously not welcome.
So if JFK Airport removed TSA and just let people walk on to the plane, would you board one? I sure as hell wouldn't.

I don't know what I don't know about international security. I don't have access to the NSA and CIA files about international terrorism. Sure, some of it is overplayed for certain people's agendas, but it's very clearly an actual risk that needs actual solutions. The TSA may not be the best one, but if it was removed, it would need to be replaced by something that would probably end up looking very similar.
How does this compare to shippable? Specifically, does it build docker containers which can be pushed to a registry (e.g. google's) and then deployed using Kubernetes into google cloud?
Barriers are never needed for accesses to a single location as all practical systems guarantee total ordering, that a given. But on a refcounted system the only place to put the barrier for correct visibility, it is together with the refcount update.

It is true that on x86 all stores and loads have the correct implicit barriers, but you still get a store-load (including its cycle cost) with lock xadd whether you want it or not.
Well, maybe it's a new idea for a song like "United Breaks Guitars"? :) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YGc4zOqozo
Direct link to the PDF: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ptresearch/me-disablement/...
How is 'purpose' a legal term? What is the purpose of a game? To milk money from fans? To obey to some company's internal schedule? To entertain..... review sites? To entertain me? To showcase technology? To insert subliminal messages and DRM? All of the above? None?

What was the purpose of tamagotchis?

We may never know.
The realignments in the US are complicated, but the movement to the right goes way beyond just reaction to globalization and technology. At least three things have happened (imo): 1) both the public and the government have become far more politically polarized, 2) the net change from polarization has still been to the right, and 3) the government has become more openly authoritarian.

It's Even Worse Than It Looks by Thomas Mann and Norman Ornstein[1][2] makes a really good case for (1) and (2). That has been going on for around 50 years now, since the (end of) Carter and (start of) Reagan administrations. The Democrats lost a 40-year streak of Congressional control to the Republicans in 1992, eventually evolving into the far-right obstructionist Congressional Republicans of today. In the meantime even the liberal Democrat presidents became more conservative on their overall policies (excepting a few social issues like LGBTQ issues) - Obama's healthcare reforms being similar to conservative proposals from the 1980's and Clinton famously saying that the "era of big government is over."

For (3) you have the new executive powers to wage war without Congressional approval (e.g. the AUMF under Bush and Libyan intervention under Obama), bipartisan expansion of warrantless surveillance by both parties (wiretapping under Bush and Snowden revelations under Obama), extrajudicial assassination programs, etc etc. Under the typical US understanding of the terms, this would all certainly be considered "right wing." For the public's part, you see way more widespread support and acceptance for the policies than you did during e.g. Vietnam or even WW2 (opposition to entering the war and the Lend-Lease program, etc).

There has been some occasional reversal towards the center, with e.g. Sanders, Obamacare, Occupy Wall Street, some other examples, but overall the US has been going net right since at least Jimmy Carter. I'd say the opposition to free trade, unless it really steamrolls into something bigger, is currently just another short-term reversal to the center, set against a continual bull market for the political right.

[1] http://www.amazon.com/Even-Worse-Than-Looks-Constitutional/d...

[2] http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2015-10-14/thomas-man...
See the glorification of the advertising industry in a popular TV show "Mad Men"
How is the EU a guarantor of democracy? Our national governments are far more democratic than the EU. Free movement of labour isn't necessarily something that's good for working people, particularly at the lower end of the income distribution, as that means competition from people who are willing to work for much lower wages.
L.A. Times Investor Seeks to Revive Print with ‘Machine Vision’
The VVD is traditionally right-wing, but I think the article uses "right-wing" here to mean "extreme right" or perhaps "new right" or "non-traditional right" or whatever you would call it. Not sure really...
He completely forgot his laptop, moved away from the security check and only later figured out he was missing his laptop.

With hundreds of people moving through those checkpoints, I do not blame the TSA agents for handing stuff out to completely random people.
> Huh? That's not really true. Part of the reason the GOP is having such a hard time in the US right now is because minority populations are quickly starting to rise in numbers and they don't vote Republican for any number of reasons.

There's a shift underway. I think we'll see a repositioning of the GOP that will lead it to a majority in less than 10 years if not sooner. Trump's surprisingly high support from Latinos in the Primary is the first wave of this.
32.3%
There's a big anti EU sentiment in Europe after years of financial repercussions because of the financial crisis and the refugee crisis. And the only parties who are even critical of the EU are on the far right and on the far left.
I always assumed the breakfast phrase had its origin in Kafka's Metamorphosis:

> The washing up from breakfast lay on the table; there was so much of it because, for Gregor's father, breakfast was the most important meal of the day and he would stretch it out for several hours as he sat reading a number of different newspapers.

But then again, I guess it would have never become such a common phrase through Kafka alone. Funny would be if the above formulation only appeared in post 1944 translations.
Are you not required to remove laptops from sleeves while sending through the scanner?
I have a "TSA Friendly" laptop bag (it even has a stitched on label). The laptop pocket unzips to the bottom of the compartment and folds along the bottom, so the laptop is still in its pocket, but there is nothing but fabric and foam between it and the belt. The metal parts of the bag as well as anything else metal I might be carrying are all folded to he other side and don't shield (electromagnetically) the laptop.
Vietnam has mild censorship - the block the BBC unless you use a VPN - and the government isn't that unpopular with free health and education and 7% growth so they don't have to try that hard. You can still end up fired/imprisoned/deported if you do the wrong thing though.
There's a reason the first thing I do with a new laptop is add about fifteen assorted stickers to it. Very helpful at conferences and such when it comes to keeping laptops distinct.
They are definitely originally built on that, but that's not why they keep adding voters. This is where most analysts go wrong and why they are surprised every time there is an election in Europe.

It's about fear of change, about being left behind. Not out of choice but out of lack benefit from technology, globalization etc.

They are not benefitting from it so why should they keep voting from it?
If the refcount is allocated in the same cacheline with the rest of the object, then false sharing is also a problem. But the violation of the single writer principle when updating refcounts is actually a form of true sharing.
>After all, our parents were the ones that witnessed it, and they should have a better understanding of what really happened.

Why? Were they everywhere? Did they witness everything? Do they remember perfectly?

Edit: Typo
Is not helping people starving or dying of Malaria in Africa/Asia right wing too? Both are some serious maladies affecting people very far from us, with whom we have nothing in common.

As for the Syrians, they'd had to cross something like 6-7 borders before they even reach Poland. It would make just such much sense to ship them to US or Canada or Argentina.

EDIT (probably a clearer way to make my point): Once the Syrians flee from the war zone to for example Turkey, their life is no longer in danger. So, them going from Turkey to Poland is not about saving lives, and cannot be posed as a moral argument.
>What was the purpose of tamagotchis? We may never know.

But we can breath a sigh of relief that whatever it was, we beat them in the end.
The first commit seems to be from april, so it can't have been on github for much more than a month or so.

Before it was under perforce, apparently.
I usually put a friend's email/phone on my phone's lock screen. That way they actually can contact someone (since I just lost the means to do so). I hope a potential robber wouldn't take this as info of a good target, though.
Yes, there is an Alexa app that presents the shopping and todo lists. Both with checkboxes. It also shows you a history of things you've said to it, how they were interpreted, and you can give it feedback. In addition, you use the app to set any audio accounts (Spotify, etc) that you want it to use when playing music.
Just as one example, the FPö, which just very narrowly lost the Austrian elections, was literally founded by nazis. They explicitly promote an ethnic-nationalist Austrian identity at the expense of any notion of cosmopolitanism or post-nationalism. Their frequent talk of Heimat is not all that different from the blut und boden of earlier times.

If this isn't right-wing identity politics, I don't know what is.
I use :input (https://api.jquery.com/input-selector/) occasionally
I'm still waiting for that semiconductor technology to become available to the DIY community.
Trello Get Serious About Big Businesses as It Passes 1.1M Daily Users
That was true for the original founding of the parties but thats not why they keep growing. This is important to understand.
This seems like a nice resource for swashing through the terms and conditions jungle: https://tosdr.org/
In which browser? Modern implementations shouldn't even make that possible.
Exactly. Nazi stands for "national socialism", exploiting our tendency towards ingroup/outgroup thinking combined with financial advantages and a strong feeling of belonging and purposes for the members of the ingroup, at the expense of some minority.

Its historically interesting though that the capitalists were generally supporters of the nazi party, even before the times of slave labour and war time profits. I guess social darwinism was a good match for the capitalist competition mindset.
And if you vote for Hillary you are supporting her lust for war.

Thats not a fair way to talk about voting. It's a cheap attempt to try and make a blanket moral statement to render everything else others would say morally wrong.
Absolutely, and these parties are posing as a solution to whatever the current problem happens to be (populism).

People looking for simplification, maybe because they are unable to understand more complex situations, tend to go for the shallow, simple-looking, party.
Programming and Algebra for every student
Congress cut the TSA budget 15% at the same time there is a 15% increase in traffic.

Sure, blame 'that guy'.
From what I've seen, courts are frequently asked to answer questions just like this one. They do not seem to be as troubled by slippery slopes because it's their job to decide where the line is.

If you're a student using CryEngine you're probably not worth suing for copyright infringement (at worst a C&D maybe). If you're a corporate entity who is distributing a game which licenses CryEngine, you certainly may be worth suing for infringement.
So much of that goes on.

http://www.vox.com/2016/4/21/11451378/smug-american-liberali...
I think racist and anti-immigration are two different things. Most racists probably are against immigration, but not everybody who is against immigration is racist.
It is probably an arse covering measure. If someone uses the engine for serious work and it somehow fails, there isn't a route to ask them to cover financial/other damages because they told you not to use it that way (and you agreed not to use it that way via this license).
For what it's worth, that is what countries with competent security do (Israel, China whenever/wherever there are security concerns), multiple stages of security checks (but of course the earlier ones are designed to minimise queuing to avoid that exact issue).

Typically there will be one security check on the road before cars enter the airport (this can be just a drive-by check for anything suspicious), then either scanner or explosive chemicals check at the entrance doors.

Also, the area in front of the security check is arranged with a large "buffer space" not allowing anyone without a boarding pass to get close to the security check lines (and again with guards looking out for anything suspicious).
Software that everyone in the world can use simultaneously. Sounds like a pretty good invention to me.
>Most people I know don't like the sanctions against Russia

>people's "No" vote is just ignored

>Maybe because the "extreme" left and right have much less affiliations and friends in the EU

This points make me really sad. First, because right-wing parties are actively propped up by Russian govt [1]; second, because Russia openly engaged in propaganda and false flags campaign against Ukraine in EU [2]; third, because I'm Russian, an external pressure on the regime is one of the few hopes for a change, and it seems like Russian govt is strong at least in your network, so the pressure will not become stronger. Additionally, quite a few nice people will probably be infected by memes that poisoned Russian society for decades.

It's really sad.

[1]: http://imrussia.org/en/analysis/world/2500-putinism-and-the-...

[2]: https://www.bellingcat.com/news/uk-and-europe/2016/04/03/azo...
Let me know if there's any way we can help! job at gitlab!
Rebound: A Channel Authenticated Websocket Implementation – Lee Mason
Are you thinking of Unreal Engine? The source for CryEngine as only been available since March or April.
jQuery also tends to handle a lot of assorted browser quirks, giving you a consistent api to call.
> as a country to violate basic human rights, as long as you're powerful enough

This hardly just applies to China though. I listened to a great talk by Tony Judt yesterday, this bit seems particularly relevant: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNE83HXfGXo&t=28m28s

What you experienced were people who know they were oppressed by other people who know they are oppressing. Which is bad, but it's still a visible prison you can break out of, or you can at least hate it while you're stuck in it (don't think there are no unbreakable prisons). The free fall that follows the death of critical thought is much more sinister IMHO. It feels like there is nothing happening, because there is no friction worth mentioning, but it's still free fall.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for standing up for principles and not taking crap from any nation over it. I just am not of aware of a major nation that could do it credibly, they would have to clean their own house first.
>But the fact is that they ARE racists

Not necessarily, many of them are fine with Africans, Muslims, Jews and so on (I know I'm lumping race and religion into one here). They just want them to stay in their own country, if they insist of preserving certain parts of the culture. You want a country rules by Sharia that's fine, with most of these parties, as long you don't try to do it in their country.

I mostly view it as how apartheit wanted to be viewed: Tolerance and acceptance of each others culture, but clearly separated, in this case in countries.
Game engine companies actually tend to have separate licenses for Serious Games, with different terms and costs. This is because a Serious Game is often unlikely to be mass-market - at the extreme end of the scale, it might be developed for only one client to ever use.
It's not that weird - it just reflects history. Norway as well as a centre-right party called Venstre and a right wing/conservative party called Høyre ("right"). In our case it dates straight back to the fight over parliamentarism in Norway, and the left/right naming took inspiration directly from the origin of the left/right axis in the aftermath of the French revolution (where those seated to the left were those against the monarchy and those seated to the left were supporters of the monarchy), so the most monarchy friendly party was "obviously" right wing.

The name first started looking weird when the Labour Party (then revolutionary socialists, now social democrats) was formed well to their left, followed by further splits up until todays situation where there are - depending on how you place two of the more centrist parties - between four and six parties to the left of Venstre in Norway, counting parties that have or have had a member of parliament at some point. I don't know the history of the Danish party names, but I'm expecting it is a similar history of very literally being the left when formed only to have the balance shift substantially to the left since.

The US colour use is different in that it was simply a matter of not taking historic use of the colours into account and arbitrarily applying it in election broadcasts, only to have it stick.
See also:

BBC: "Royal Society calls for review of European GM ban"

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-36359682

Royal Society: "Genetically modified (GM) plants: questions and answers"

https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/projects/gm-plants/
I thought that left/right was originally and primarily about state involvement or not, so I guess centralisation/individuality.
Terrorist or pedophile? This startup says it can out secrets by analyzing faces
Agreed that the public won't abandon facebook.

But I don't understand what point you are making.