You pulling most out of context. The theory is here:

http://www.amazon.com/Basic-Structures-Matter-Supergravitati...

Most of your points are taken out of context. If you don't understand the model, they don't make much sense.

First this are the basic assumptions:

- 3 dimensional eucledian space without physical properties

- 2 types of very small fundamental particels. Basically balls that are indestructible and vibrate

- 1 law of attraction valid in empty space. F_sg = G_0 * (m1*m2)/r^3. Which makes logical sense in our 3 dimensions.
- classical logic

>> The energy is inseparable attribute of the matter.

You don't understand the difference between Newtonian mass and matter in this model. Newtownian mass is a derived effect of all high level structures that are impassible by CL space - eg. a certain size.

>> The Bohr atomic model is a correct mathematical model when assuming that the space is void.

After certain constants from the standard model are derived, eg. chapter 2,3,5,6 you can put up a mathematical model that is like the Bohr one, but this is not what the BSM model actually shows. Once you understand the geometric structure of protons/neutrons/electrons you will understand that even quantum mechanics is very close to the Bohr model compared to the BSM one.

>> The intrinsic matter could never disappear.

Yes. It would violate the energy conservation and it has been shown that this is the golden rule. As said mass != matter !!!!

>> The vacuum is not a void space, but contains a unique grid structure. This grid structure named a Cosmic Lattice (CL) is built by two types of alternatively arranged nodes, each one containing 4 sub-elementary particles with shape of six sided prisms.

It becomes obvious once a super massive black hole is understood, how a crystalization process will first create those complex formed prisms with it's substructures and later high level structures like protons/neutrons/electrons. Unfortunately apart from one type of GRBs as the last signature of the process, it is mostly hidden from observation due physical reasons.

> The Newton’s gravitation (universal gravitational law) is a propagation of the IG field in CL space

So, you neigher will be able to understand CL space nor the IG field by now and the first thing you cry is crackpottery.

> Even if you're not a physicist, you can see what kind of a "scientist" he is by checking his publication history (0 papers in any respectable physics journal).

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stoyan_Sargoytchev/publ...

you are very bad at searching I have to say.

Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics

Annales Geophysicae

Indian Journal of Physics

Canadian Journal of Physics

Applied Optics

Physics Essays

Advances in Space Research

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

...

To deduce a complete new model, you need to have a look in all areas of physics/chemistry and not just at one, especially theoretical ones. And you need to read a lot of papers and especially the ones that contradict the status quo.

And yes, the model explains much more then the standard model through fewer assumptions. Most of your "constants" are just derived.