skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
"Full stack"? Check. Hipster tld? Check. Argument based on scientifically obvious weak correlation? Check.

Well obviously this guy is going to think JavaScript is the most important thing in the universe. That's probably the only programming language he knows.

What a poor world that must be.

Obviously hobby projects are nice to have. But you should have them because you care, not because you need an "asset".

There's just so much to learn out there, so much fun! Why oh why limit yourself to the same old JavaScript?
Not at all, the key in weevs case was intent.
>At the end of the 2-year study, survival was lower in the control group of males than in all groups of male rats exposed to GSM-modulated RFR...

ex-biologist here. Re: the last statement, if radiation is actually affecting tissues (I don't personally really believe the data shows a de-facto effect) then there is a hypothesis among some scientists that study radiation exposure that small chronic doses actually prime your body for dealing with minor changes in genetic structure (if you're into it, the mechanism is hypothesized to be via epigenetic up-regulation of DNA-repair protein coding genes[1]). Since Sprague-Dawley rats are known to develop spontaneous tumors after one year regardless of treatment, this is my hypothesis for explaining the apparent effect of shortened life in the control group.

[1] - just google scholar the keywords "radiation upregulation dna repair". there are tons of papers on this effect.
Had, and many people think so. Somebody even made a TrueType font called Dijkstra (http://ufonts.com/fonts/dijkstra.html)

If you want to keep one, it is worthwhile to download it from a few sites; multiple variants exist. AFAIK the only difference between them is the character set (a couple of fractions, IIRC)
Only articles based on EU funded research or also articles based on research funded by member states?
Clearly its the belters :-)

More seriously this has been the second coolest space thing in recent times (the first coolest being the Pluto flyby). It is so annoying that we can't just go out there with all the tools we can think of, land there, and have a look around.
It doesn't affect Adwords for search results. That is the real cash cow that is growing each year by double digit percentages.

Doubleclick and Adsense on the other hand are starting to slow down and make up less share of Google's overall revenue [1]. In 2004 it was 50% of their revenue, now it's 20% and it's probably going to shrink even further as AdWords revenue and other revenues(cloud, apis) increase.

> [1] http://www.statista.com/statistics/266471/distribution-of-googles-revenues-by-source/
Incredibly interesting, and waaaay more data than I expected. The fancy d3 weighted tree/forking chart was fascinating.

> I tried to categorize cries as they were happening (because I wanted to create a real-time crying dashboard)

Sure, who hasn't wanted to create a real-time crying dashboard?
It kind of depends - in some jurisdictions, for example, interoperability requirements is a sufficient defense against copyright infringement, i.e., if you've built your product so that interoperating with it requires [re]using copyrighted parts, then it's okay to do so (up to the extent required for interoperability) even if you explicitly forbid it.

Sane laws such as that automatically prevent issues such as this Java API dispute and also things such as the attempts to block interoperability for coffee machine "pods" by requiring a copyrighted magic string and using DMCA to prevent others from using it.
> The amorphousness and formlessness of this ideology and its lack of coherent theoretical basis (as opposed to something more rigidly principled like Marxism, libertarianism, etc) is what provides cover for its true aim, which is political power for its adherents.

But see, their ideology is postmodernism, which teaches that all truth claims are not really true in any universal sense, but are only valid within certain sociological groups. It also teaches that all speech is about power, and only that. So they are in fact acting consistently with their ideology.

It certainly is amorphous and formless, and lacks a coherent theoretical basis, though, I'll give you that.
Looks like I was wrong. You do have to enable lingering[1].

[1] - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd/User#Automatic_...
I can see the evil people behind the TTIP getting in the way of this. Before this goes into effect, the US will execute order 66 and take all the articles down.
What is CSRF?
The crying post is good, but also the rest of the website. Amazing amount of data.
>Parsing both those layers — the behavior and the meta-behavior, the story told and the story of why it’s being told that way

This is a fairly major way of partitioning literary analysis. I've seen it called "Watsonian" vs "Doyleist" - you can either take a look at the narrative elements in the story, or at the circumstances facing the author.
Supposedly his phone is also locked down to just ~10 other similarly secure numbers, while Clinton wanted to be able to use her secure phone to call her entire staff. That would've required dozens or hundreds more devices, which is a problem when every possible loss or compromise of any device is such a huge deal.
Could VirnetX sue for defamation if Apple specifically said that?
Oracle paid for all the work done on VirtualBox. They paid for the past work and they pay for current work. You can dismiss it as something they bought, but that doesn't address that they paid for all the past work done on it when they bought it. It doesn't address that they pay to maintain and innovate on it. Everyone knows vagrant works with other VMs. Almost everyone uses VirtualBox. You are not obligated to thank them, but you are an ingrate if you do use it and don't have an attitude of thankfulness that it works well for you (if that is the case). I mean, if a person does that they really are ungrateful. What else do they complain about? Do I hate working with them? Probably. Attitude and acknowledgement of the way things actually work and who pays for them is a big part of being a nice person
What are the actual patents? I never see them explicitly listed anywhere.
Lena Dunham,Bey,Apology Plague& my rage against the machine #sorrynotsorry
I'm really glad someone had the courage to share this data.. Growing up I was always under the impression that it was wrong to cry, and it probably exasperated some of my depressive episodes.

Strangely, after becoming a father, I feel like I'm even more sensitive and can cry at the drop of a seemingly innocent comment. I bet I cry almost daily.. But after it occurs, it's refreshing. I feel stronger.
It's called a sankey diagram if that helps. And, yes, they are the coolest.
One thing that you guys might be interested in: there has been some limited investigation into tandem cycling as a therapy for Parkinson's, though it's somewhat anecdotal. What research there is suggests that it's about being forced to cycle at 80-to-90 rpm at a lower resistance which still keeps your heart rate up, as opposed to cycling voluntarily at whatever pace you want while being coached to keep your heart rate at the same level: 5 people who were forced to cycle at the higher RPM showed dramatic improvements in symptoms, as opposed to 5 who set their own RPM with coaching.

Since those numbers are so low, there is right now a team at the Cleveland Clinic which recruiting for a much larger study (100 people total) that they're calling CYCLE: 40 people with PD will do forced exercise on a motorized stationary bike in the lab, 40 will do voluntary exercise on a normal stationary bike in the lab, and 20 will not be directed to exercise at all in the lab:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4415238/

This is right now still in the recruiting stage so it probably has a couple years before it yields results; but if your friend can't live in Cleveland for a year, you could try to find another way to keep yourself at the 80-90 RPM levels, whether tandem biking with your friend or else by jury rigging a motor or perhaps even self-discipline.
Because it's against their interests to make the creation of laws simple and transparent, because it would remove a lot of their ability to sneak in things like this to push a hidden agenda.

When you can push your own (or your sponsors') interests in relative secrecy, transparency is anathema.
Some public funding of copyrighted art work purchases would be also useful, if that's the only viable alternative to decreasing copyright age to some reasonable 20-30 years.
You could search PGP keyservers for email addresses/domains of the local media where that retirement fund is located and take it from there, using your own judgment about the reporter and outlet, and how much you'd want to mask that communication.
> I've always considered myself to be a bit of a crybaby

No, that's some ridiculous amount of crying. I wonder if it's severe depression or Pseudobulbar affect or some hormonal disorder.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudobulbar_affect
I think there's more than one cultural difference at work here. It's not just that there are cultural differences between the U.S. and China, but that there are generational cultural differences between you and me. It's been almost 20 years since I was an undergraduate. Back then, at my institution anyhow, sharing old exams that weren't publicly posted was considered deeply dishonest. As bad as having a ringer sit the exam for you. I was deeply shocked when, as a senior, I finally learned about the fraternities' libraries. Certainly, I was naive at the time. But my point is that, however you want to rationalize the practice of sharing old exams, it gives an unfair leg up to people who have access.

At any rate, I thank you for the discussion. I'm going to be away from the internet for the weekend, so I'll yield the floor and read any further responses later.
Fascinating dataset. I think ending a long term, long distance relationship (and then finding out he was married all along), probabaly skewed this dataset upwards.

Last time I cried was watching the most recent episode of Game of Thrones. And then watching YouTube reaction videos of that episode, a little less crying with each video. Hodor...
Field offices don't have unlimited budgets. If it turns out this raid was unjustified - and it certainly appears to be - its not going to reflect positively on the people who caused it.
As described, it appears growth will depend on social network effects. The current standard strategic advice would be to build something a few people love. Out of that falls the tactical advice to make something that can be put in front of a very few potential users right now, collect feedback, and quickly iterate.

In the US, and possibly other markets, there are potential legal impediments due to gambling laws. Worldwide, there may be acceptance issues among payment networks.

In broad strokes, I wonder how an app is better than exchanging cash in terms of "the important thing isn't that I won, it's that you lost" in the social context.
Clinton’s e-mail scandal another case of the entitled executive syndrome
Does anyone know if it's possible to disable this? For teams like mine, where we want to have only one owner for each issue, it's meant many more clicks to perform a reassignment operation.
Assigning pull requests to multiple people is fantastic: sometimes you're modifying a library and want the owner of that library to review your code, but you're simultaneously modifying the clients of that library and want their owners to review the change as well.

Assigning issues to multiple owners is a recipe for complete and utter inaction from all parties involved.
Unless they put a banner at the top after you login that says "This server is private blah blah blah"
Great! Now it would be cool if I could save a group so I could in one click assign my pr's to my team instead of having to individually add each member each time
That helps a lot, thanks! I've mostly used Highcharts but now am going to have to dive into d3 to play around with some of this...
You can do this with user level systemd instances: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Systemd/User
Please don't post snarky dismissals, even if an article isn't very good. It damages the kind of discourse we're going for here.

Attacking the author, and not just the article, is still worse.

(I wrote this when your comment consisted of just the first three paragraphs. The stuff you added later is better, because it isn't snarky and responds to specifics.)
As listed in the article:

https://www.google.com/patents/US6502135

https://www.google.com/patents/US7418504

https://www.google.com/patents/US7490151

https://www.google.com/patents/US7921211
It most certainly is information protected by HIPAA. It's just that there are no enforced consequences for companies breaking HIPAA (or pretty much any other law) while there are dire consequences for people accessing public data under the CFAA. I'll put it this way: if I wanted to murder someone in the US and get away with it, there are dozens of opportunities under the law as long as said murder is committed under the umbrella of a corporation. But god fucking forbid you access public data that was not secured properly by idiotic corporations and your life is ruined like this researcher's is about to be. Our judicial system is a joke; a society without justice is no different than the random savagery it purports to be above.
Se also this recent confused article in the Guardian, which hilariously portrays the IMF as a "Neoliberal" institution: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2016/apr/15/neoliberalism-...
Pfft give me back a 20th century existence, pre-internet, pre-computer, 19th century, Middle Age, Roman, Greek, Egyptian, Mesopotamian, Stone Age, neanderthal, monkey, worm, bacteria, whatever. A bunch of junk we're pouring money into and wasting talent on now.
3 years of Unsplash
> Most often this comes from educated people who think that their education constitutes the whole of all knowledge about the universe and that there is nothing left to be discovered.

Such biologists may even believe they know how cells divide, because they've observed stages of cell division and given them fancy Latin names.
> Why would the FBI and prosecutors punish Patterson? The gave the FBI an opportunity for raids and prosecutions, and those look great on an annual review.

Why go after Patterson? Because that would give them opportunities for more raids and prosecutions, which look great on an annual review. And raids and prosecutions for acts which are probably more politically useful to politically-minded US Attorneys than whatever kind of case they could make against Shafer.
You can sue for anything, so yes, but in this thought experiment they would lose the lawsuit. In order for a defamation/libel lawsuit to be successful, the statement must be untrue.
It's not socialized medicine. Technically it made it possible to get insurance subsidized (or fully funded) if you cannot afford it, prevented insurers from pricing with anything but age/gender/tobacco/location, and dings you with small tax penalties if you don't buy it (on the assumption that everyone will eventually then buy insurance and the net cost to society will go down).

Honestly, probably a better long term solution than socialized medicine, but it still allows individuals the freedom to screw up and not buy insurance.
I got bored and think I found out who the principal was. Was it B--- Hou----?

Edit: not trying to freak you out or anything. In the spirit of this article on publicly accessible information, I wanted to see if I could find out who it was through public means.
If you're trying to cool a building, the goal isn't moving air, it's moving heat. Pushing air around is a convenient way of moving that heat around inside a structure, but it's a lousy way of changing the total amount of heat inside the structure.
Well there is like 30 seconds from House TV series, so I guess they can claim the whole video (9:57:33) be blocked in US.
> Could VirnetX sue for defamation if Apple specifically said that?

Probably not with any reasonable chance of success. At least in the U.S. legal system, if you can convince the jury that your allegation was in fact true, then that's an absolute defense to a defamation action. (There would also be other obstacles, which I won't address here.)
In Finland, you can send an anonymous tip to the Communications Regulation Authority, who will then inform the service provider.

Perhaps the FCC has something similar?
Absolutely! There's been a real effort to advance useful Copyright Reform - often kicking and screaming - in ways that should hopefully bring back more progress to the arts. I think most musicians learn about respect for others' work at various stages in their careers, and eventually, come to realize that paying tribute and being a part of the conversation has been fenced off by "rights holders" of various sorts.

Honestly I'm glad that there's this new kind of "grey area" where legalized methods are popping up. They're not perfect. Is this trend better than nothing? I think so - I think this is what tech and artistic progress working alongside each other somewhat resembles.
I just don't understand why you and the op think this. Here is a link to what you get with your first point of rep.

http://stackoverflow.com/help/privileges/create-posts

Checking now, it seems you can answer without even logging in.
Or.... Side-projects could be your most important asset. I'd even argue that intentionally non-JS projects are going to help you much more than JS ones.
A lot of people make a good living building great apps that you use every day in javascript and a lot of people are trying to break into that line of work. For those people this article is both relevant and a decent guide. I hire Javascipt developers and guess what? If you are junior and trying to bust in and you show me a badass side project, you have a shot, so this guy isn't wrong at all.

[edited: less snarkiness]
It'd be factually accurate so I don't think so (IANAL).
How is this related to the US at all?
I'm just posing the question. We can assume that the HR people at Goldman Sachs are not idiots. There was no obviously better system or they and many other companies would have used it.

So lets say you identify the best team (itself a flawed concept - is sales more important than development, since they bring in the cash?) , then do you propose to treat everyone in the team the same? What about the new hire into the team who is struggling and should never have been a developer in the first place? What about the lazy stoner? What about the girl genius who reworked the problem areas over a weekend? Should they all get the same raise because they're on the same team?
My first thought was "damn, those exposure powers are extremely high".

Think about it... even the 0.5 W/kg treatment is still about 40W for average human adolescent male. That's a LOT of power from just a cell phone
That's sounds like quite an interesting story if what you are saying is taken as true and at face value. Have you tried contacting press, or lawyers in the US who would want to take on your case?
> I'm sorry you have a giant squirming bug up your ass

Please don't respond to a snarky comment by posting something even worse. That's exactly the wrong direction to take.
Sure, but then they have to do that, they can't just passively snoop everything. Beating someone with a hose until they talk has different PR implications than than secretly picking their locks and reading their mail.
Encrypt, hexdump, render in green font on black background, set as wallpaper. Nobody will ask :)
Technically it is just another sensor/actuator loop.
While the high level concept is the same, it's not that they "feel" pain just the way we do.
I hate when balancing tests are invoked when the law is clear on its face.

But the 4th amendment is different than the 1st and the 2nd. It has balancing built into it, by only prohibiting "unreasonable" searches and seizures. It's as if the 1st amendment said "Congress shall make no law ... abridging the freedom of reasonable speech" or if the 2nd amendment said "the right of the people to keep and bear arms reasonably, shall not be infringed."
The only effective countermeasure is for everyone to encrypt everything. Unless you wan to get half of the population to torture the other half in shifts...
> Running your own SMTP server at home is a pain in the ass, so it will never be widely adopted.

It is, but it doesn't have to be. Someone could make a <$100 device which has a power backup for running through power outages and a backup network connection via the cellular network, which should provide high enough uptime for all practical purposes. Messages between mail servers are encrypted most of the time, more and more so every year [1]. This is a technical solution for a legal problem, though.

I'm not sure if I understand the system you are proposing, but email protocols seem secure enough now as they are now, it's just the third party principle that doesn't align with the obvious expectations of privacy in mail [2]. To me, it's pretty clear that my email account is like a PO box. Just because my email is held by a third party doesn't make it any less private than being delivered to my home, just as mail arriving at a "third-party" PO box isn't all that different from my mailbox.

1. https://www.google.com/transparencyreport/saferemail/
2. http://techcrunch.com/2014/04/30/google-will-also-stop-scann...
The TTIP
Well I didn't downvote you, but if you refuse to even acknowledge that "torn limb from limb" is just annoyance with your inability to acknowledge the existing information, then perhaps the fault is with you and not others.

One might also say that there is no tech with as rabidly fervent detractors as GMO. I don't really care about the technology much, and for some reason you think I'm a fervent supporter! Ridiculous.
Really? I thought it was "lay-tack".
You should run for President.
The site is about isomorphic JavaScript development (JS on the client and server). So they advocate JavaScript
The Micron chip is 9mm x 14mm (same as their older 4Gbit DDR3), and the Intelligent Memory one is 10mm x 13mm. Of course, if you are doing new PCB designs, you probably want to allocate the extra footprint so you are not stuck with a single source.
> You kind of did, when you signed up.

Problem is many people signed up years ago and I bet they've changed their ToS and privacy policy 100 times since then without people noticing.

Facebook satisfied our needs to connect with our friends when it arrived. Now it's 100% ads. I used to have real discussions with friends, but the comment quality today is basically on par with youtube (if not worse).
~600 rps is an very low bar to set.

Not to mention that database is the bottleneck in this benchmark.