skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I think if you are using a text editor to browse 50mb logs you are probably doing it wrong. Try grep.
What about it? Not all speech is protected and there is a case to be made of the harm such speech poses. This is why we can't yell "fire!" in a crowded theater. Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919)
Radical improvements aren't generally from minor refinements.
If a preliminary test shows something they're happy to run more tests. It's how they make money. ER is triage. If it's not something they can fix with a needle and a bag (or a needle and thread) rolling you in for expensive tests and specialist consultations is their entire business model. Your commentary doesn't make sense.
> mathematically capable of predicting every physical phenomenon we're capable of observing here on earth

"Mathematically predict" is too strong. For example, we can observe the mass of the electron here on earth, but our theories do not mathematically predict it. There are many similar parameters whose values must be determined empirically.

There's also the converse: properties we can mathematically predict, but for which we do not have a good theory. An example is the mass of the Tau: predicted by the Koide formula, but we don't really know why.
I have never seen lock-free synchronization touted as a simpler alternative to locking. (And I do lock-free synchronization.) Avoiding synchronization as much as possible is a good principle - one which I use often, and I actually contend is the only way to write scalable code. But someone always need to eventually synchronize. Even if it's not your code explicitly, somewhere, your code will have to rely on code someone else wrote that synchronizes. This article is aimed to those people.
I've used ketamine to self-medicate depression. I decided to out of desperation. It was extremely effective for me.

Several provisos for potential users:

- Read the papers. If you can't read the papers on K as a depression treatment and come up with your own dosing protocol, you probably shouldn't try K.

- Probably don't try it if you have an addictive personality.

- Make sure you're aware of potential side effects such as memory and urinary issues. That said, doses used in treatment protocols shouldn't come anywhere near that.

I waited forever to just get some goddamn K and treat myself, because everybody on the internet is like "don't do it, you'll fuck yourself up". I'm smart and do my homework, and I regret not trusting myself and suffering for longer than needed.
They are exhausted from working minimum wage jobs, and the police will clean up any rabble-rousers.
You need to further define 'share data'? Usually it could be done, to connect multiple different services through a central data storage, let it be redis/cassandra/RDBMS/HBase...

If what you mean by sharing data is about dependency between calls to different services, e.g. A -> B -> C..., I would go with Storm and other stream processing frameworks, cause that is why those frameworks are built...
You just said that rich kids are too weak to survive in the real world, and the solution for that is to crack down on poor kids.
Are there other dead projects? Looks like only Foresight to me.
What's yer name, nigger?
You can almost certainly restrict it on public broadcast TV, which would be a good start. The FCC has pretty broad powers to regulate broadcast TV and radio compared to other kinds of speech. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairness_Doctrine#Decisions_of...
The question before cutting each cost:
Will this help my staff be more productive and happy?

The assumption being a happy and productive staff creates better products.

Panda? Maybe not.

Free soda? Keeps our engineers from being thirsty! Yes.

Bring all you mates to friday open bar? Maybe not

Bring your closest mates to drink beer and talk shop? Yes.
Unrelated but I also gave up on fixing my problem: For the past ~8 years I have a constant feeling that one of my nostrils is almost closed and hard to breath. I went to several doctors, did all kinds of exams and they found nothing.

I feel like I need to blow my nose all the time and it drives me crazy sometimes. It gets worse when I have a flu. Sometimes it even bleeds a little, like it's irritated.

My family thinks I'm crazy so I stopped mentioning a long time ago, and one of the doctors even laughed at me.
What's wrong with expropriating unearned wealth?
"Being addicted, by itself, is not a big deal."
- As someone with an en extensive amount of first-hand knowledge, I disagree very very much. It is in fact so big of a deal that it becomes your one and only deal.

The worst part is, if you use opiates for a long period of time consistently - you WILL become reliant upon them. Your body will be chained to them, physically dependent, and I don't care who you are, where you come from, or how much money you have. 100% of the time, no exceptions willpower be damned.

And as far as using opiates as a means to heal emotional pain and depression? That's is possibly the worst idea ever. You're flat out asking for a long, long slow death in which you probably kill yourself in the end anyway but in the meantime you disappoint anyone who has ever cared about you even slightly.
Facebooks servers. Phones could not be capable of doing that much facial recognition that quick. Plus that bandwidth to grab all your friends images to compare to would be a metric ton of images given some selfie-addicts.
Not directly relevant but that battery is not powered by lemonade or bleach!

It's powered by the metal wires placed in the electrolyte, not the electrolyte. The metal oxidizes (corrodes, burns), and that is what provides the energy.
How much vacations do your kids take?
This is a similar argument used by users of languages like J, K and APL. The language is small and concise - rather than learn libraries or frameworks you use the primitives and the emphasis is on the data being manipulated. Common patterns (like +/%# for average) are recognized rather than named.
Not to get too high-minded here but the most fundamental question of everyday life: "why live at all?" is greatly dependent on completely understanding the what we currently consider outermost fringes of physics.

Free Will in a deterministic universe is non-existent so there is no physical capacity for choice, but once we breached the quantum threshold all sorts of fun concepts began emerging (like multiverses for example) that bring that lack of capacity into question.
Just to mirror what's in the reddit thread the quick "fix" for this is to simply link to notelemetry.obj just as you would with the other small obj files included in the CRT lib directory[1]. Oddly notelemetry.obj is missing from their list.

[1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms235330.aspx
I believe the force the roof was subjected to was equivalent to 5 Model S' atop the test vehicle

Tesla should start doing ads like this:

http://www.curbsideclassic.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/19...

https://d37nk263jfz2p8.cloudfront.net/image/1/700/0/uploads/...
> If yes, the device can never be trusted second-hand - the OS might have been modified to secretly accept more keys.

That's always going to be a risk with second-hand devices (or even new devices). Who knows what kind sneaky things someone did to a device that they had long-term access to. You can never really totally trust something that you didn't build yourself from the ground up, so you always have to accept some level of risk.

That UI solution was just a random idea, I'm sure there are better ones. Like you said, it's a Hard Problem.
Wow. That's not a place to expect to find arcade games from 30 years ago.
That's not true. They have to keep a record of the data for the patient file. So it does have to communicate remotely in some fashion.
Or it shows that irresponsible reckless driving is generally a poor idea.
Well I guess we have two different sets of people and experience then. I've seen people do rather successfully in business, all while using opiates on the side. (I've seen a few people die too, but that was pretty much caused by illegal supply and lack of regulation/QC.) The actual addiction part, without supply constraints, becomes very, very simple logistics.
I used Palantir heavily in my previous work and it was disappointing at how manual it was based on what we were sold as a mostly automated platform.

It had a great interface for creating network diagrams, and collaborating but it was a huge pain to get integrated.

I mean if nothing else, give us keyword matching and linking!
So, MSFT is injecting code into a binary? This probably won't be a popular opinion here, but this does seem like a pretty good definition of malware to me. It doesn't make it okay that just because it's MSFT they can get away with it.
Many business calls are close to interpersonal content free. What are the names of your coworkers children?
I work for a medical devices company and I just want to say: We, specifically a few of us on the engineering staff, bring this sort of shit up constantly. I go hoarse having the same conversations over and over and over again about robustness in the face of failure, resiliency, redundancy, etc... The truth is that we're beholden to a board and an executive management team that, quite simply, doesn't give a fuck about our problems.

I'm not trying to excuse the company in the article or the company that I work for. And I do not work for the company in the article. I just wanted to point out that I do see how this can happen very easily and repeatedly.
What about it? I can't show pornography on TV or slander someone on a newspaper and call freedom of speech.
It does not relieve us entirely from social or political pressures, but formal lines of authority can serve as a bulwark against capricious turns of political luck. In an organization with formally defined management responsibilities, you know who to escalate to when you get conflicting requirements. If A has formal authority over the group, and tells you that you should be focusing on, say, improving the build system, but then you get a request from B (who is influential, but does not have formal authority) asking for help improving the UI, you always have the option of asking A. At the very least, if you don't ask A, you know you're taking a political risk by completing B's request before you complete A's. In a holocracy, you can take on massive political risks without realizing it, simply by misjudging the political dynamics of a group that you're new to.

I don't dispute that informal power structures exist even in organizations whose hierarchies are formally defined. However, a formal hierarchy serves as a baseline, and one can measure the level of political risk they're taking by noticing how much their actions are diverging from the formal hierarchy. If I bypass the chain of command, so to speak, and bring my concerns directly to a high-level executive, I can roughly judge who I'm going to be offending by taking that step. How does one do that in a holocracy? How do I even know who the "high-level executives" are? The holocracy literature completely hand-waves this aspect of the organization. Holocracy advocates say that you shouldn't worry; with time it becomes clear who the influencers are and who one should talk to for various matters. I don't agree with that at all. As anyone who remembers attending a public high school can tell you, humans will naturally form cliques, and it's not always obvious who the influencers are for a given clique. Moreover, as Paul Graham points out, hackers are much less interested in social dynamics (i.e. "politics" and "drama") than average people, and so are much more likely to make political miscalculations in a holocracy. It is for this reason that I consider holocracy to be a form of organization that is inherently hostile to hackers. It's a form of organization that seems custom-designed to hit us where we're weakest.
The most glaring fundamental omission of physics absolutely comes from everyday life. It is subjective experience, consciousness, qualia, or whatever you prefer to call it.
Nice to see Baruch mentioned on HN. I actually go to Baruch College and don't know much about him besides what's on the Wikipedia page. There's a statue of him sitting on a bench near the entrance and I can't help but wonder what he was like when I walk past it...
The bar for prior restraint based on content is pretty high. I believe it's "clear and present danger". You're likely to have a difficult time making the case that ads for allergy medications present a clear and present danger.
It's not so much about how much snow is on the ground, but how much might quickly fall while you're up there.
Deny the application permission to access your camera, photos, and contacts. That's a start.
It might come across as callous, but I'm only being realistic about whose responsibility it is to take care of an individual. The compulsion of government should not be used to make one individual responsible for providing for another. That is as morally abhorrent as slavery.

> think you are also assuming that there will always be sufficient numbers of jobs to keep sufficient numbers of the citizenry employed

If there isn't, and I happen to have enough wealth to survive without a job, it shouldn't be made my responsibility to provide for someone who cannot.

If a truck driver is concerned about the possibility of a shortage of jobs in thr future, then he should invest now to build his/her wealth to prepare for that eventuality.

>The 'free market' is about to break, which is the point that Yanis (and many others) has made.

There is less than zero evidence for this claim. It is dangerous fear-mongering.
This is apparently not uncommon for Volvos either:

http://www.car-accidents.com/pages/accident_story/11-11-04.h...
Shh, don't bust the bubble of people living in Silicon Valley who think they can solve the world's problems. It is absolutely ridiculous but they will never figure it out. People need to work, this is a nice project in East Africa: http://workingvillages.org/
Hackchain: Capture the Coin competition
I think it's more that they're considered impossible to judge, and so they kind of get passed around with a blank "Hey, have you ever heard of this place?" Ironically, I think you do better if you're from China. There's enough Chinese immigrants to educate you about Chinese engineering schools. Europe is just too diverse to build up this

Either way, you end up not looking at what foreign school they went to, but rather what graduate program they got into in the US.
Web Project Functional Specs: The Users
Surprised not a single mention of "The Americans" which sounds very similar (and a great show).

Edit: my bad. I did a search and it didn't return anything.
So every C++ compiler that allows you to build in the run-time library with a flag is malware? The user in this case used the /MT flag which tells the compiler to inject code by design.

The issue here isn't with injecting code, it is with what that code does. I'm sure many would find the lack of informed consent offputting, and I'd agree. This "feature" lacks documentation and or a warning.
Currently on the front page: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11651814
In my opinion, the software failed because the entire system (software, hardware, and humanware) failed to implement, holistically, a safety critical system. You simply cannot ignore the system as a whole. I'd wager we are in violent agreement. :)
#Additivism – Homo Sapiens 2.0
This was one of the largest differences between 1.8 and 1.9, to give context for when this change happened in MRI. During the split, the original interpreter was "MRI" and the bytecode VM was "YARV", but once 1.9 shipped, YARV became MRI, even though it was basically rewritten. Yay naming!
The article does mention "The Americans":

"If Tim and Alex’s story sounds eerily familiar to fans of The Americans, the television drama about a KGB couple living in the US with their two children, that’s because it’s partly based on them. ..."
An ear nose and throat doctor (otolaryngologist) should be able to inspect the opening quite well by sticking a scope in your nose (I recently had this done). One of the reasons I visited the doctor was a persistent feeling of fullness in one of my nostrils.

With a Face and Jaw CT they would be able to walk you through it all visually (ask how much it will cost up front though, it varies a lot).
You're linking against their C runtime (CRT) standard library, so it's not injecting per se. Standard C libraries often include all kinds of stuff in otherwise "empty" main(){} executables.

That being said, I've never heard of a C runtime including telemetry by default, so malware wouldn't be a totally unfounded opinion.
I liked the 1st season and stopped watching in the middle of the 2nd one, felt that the writers deliberately tried to make the main characters less likable than they were in the beginning.
The point of a linker is sort of to "inject code into a binary", and the point of a library is sort of to be code that gets injected into a binary. How does any of this relate to malware?
Except for this one:

> If Tim and Alex’s story sounds eerily familiar to fans of The Americans, the television drama about a KGB couple living in the US with their two children, that’s because it’s partly based on them.
I don't get the slight on Trump. Seems like a non-sequitur.
In my experience this tends to be based on the loudest members of each party clinging to core concepts of which they have a great degree of certainty while branding opposing partisans with straw men. The problem materializes when a loud member of the opposing view actually defends the straw man.

Just as an example, look at a recent controversy with this whole HB2 thing in North Carolina.

On the one hand you have proponents of the bill raising concerns about it enabling men an opening to enter women's restrooms by simply claiming they are something they are not. Those same proponents are willing to ignore all of the other problems with the bill while holding to this one very defensible view. Very few actually have any concerns about true transgendered people and statistics would support that view as well.

On the other side you have people outraged about discrimination of transgendered individuals who are willing to totally ignore the problem of allowing men to enter those same rooms. These people are also rightly citing the other discriminatory areas in the bill.

The news focuses only on the bathroom piece.

The result is one group rightly shouting about concerns over allowing men an excuse to enter ladies rooms and another group rightly shouting about concerns over discrimination of the transgendered.

If either side was actually listening to the other we'd be able to have a pretty simply solution to everyone's concerns.

Make men's rooms into generally accessible restrooms and leave ladies rooms as ladies rooms. That would pretty much solve the problem although it hits on the other political hot button...

Pretending men and women are not different. So the cycle begins again.

And while that's going on things like the TPP happen.

EDIT: The amount of up and down voting I'm seeing on this post seems to validate the paper's findings.
The addition of invokedynamic helped a lot too.
The argument for these ads is that many conditions are very undermedicated. People don't know they have treatable conditions and suffer needlessly.
I don't know if it's malware, but it's something really close.
One man's authoritarianism is another man's efficient market.
I remember maybe fifteen years ago seeing a crude animation of the surface temperature around the globe in the hours after the impact. The material ejected from the crater reenters to atmosphere and fries everything under it.

Another comment I read from a geologist is you see lots of periods where various animals go extinct. But in this case whole clades of plants went extinct. That you don't see.
You don't need to take it to the congress; just stop using the services of a company whose practices you don't agree with. If more people would do this, maybe the company will get the message and change its practices.
Not sure what the purpose of your reply is. It's clear that you haven't read the article nor even bothered to ctrl+f, as that would reveal it is mentioned that the family was inspiration for the show.
How to build your own Raspberry Pi Cluster
Their website seems structured that way, and also seems to have very few samples in Canada at least... It's better than nothing, but it wasn't all that convincing for me personally.
Why does the post call it a paradise when it seems to be everything but?

Is the title sarcastic?
I think they tried to use a softer introduction and then harden them up once the audience got to know them. They are brutal killers, you aren't necessarily supposed to like them.

SPOILERS

They eventually reveal themselves to the daughter and she tells her priest. It's really pushing suspension of disbelief for me that the several additional mouths stay shut.
Sounds like a great philosophy class.
But the spectacular crash didn't pinpoint the problem. That came afterwards, when the manufacturer was able to look into the crash.

In a situation like this, confusion is all but inevitable. As a developer, the goal should be to minimize that confusion to the greatest extent possible. A blank screen and crash introduces another step to the process as people wonder "what's going on?" instead of "shit, it threw an error." It's probably not a big deal, but with medical devices during surgery, that extra step could be hugely problematic.
I am 100% reliant upon, chained to, and physically dependent on both water and oxygen.

But since they are cheaply and abundantly available, I can live a full happy life anyway.
I wouldn't even know where to get it, and I don't want to get caught and go to jail, due to our stupid drug laws. :(
The value of the degree varies widely by desired career.

If you want to be a splashy top executive, it's very helpful to have a top-tier MBA, and experience in management consulting or investment banking. If you want experience in IB or MC, it's very helpful to have an ivy league undergrad degree, ideally in something like econ.

If you want to be a great engineer, it's very helpful to go someplace, hang out with smart people, take hard classes, write code outside class, and make sure you make the most of the experience, wherever you are.

If you want random assholes to think that you're a great engineer, it's very helpful to go to MIT, Stanford, or CMU, and just make sure you don't do so poorly that you don't graduate.
http://neilb.bitbucket.org/csvfix/
No one will hear you unless you go crazy
Creeped out that FB used the permissions that you gave them? I am guilty too, those permissions are too wide...
https://gist.github.com/aicpp
> B. There is more aggregate value in having everyone do a bit better than having an occasional student who's amazing and pampered. Especially if they then proceed to go leave and never interact with the local economy again.

It's not that easy. For a well-functioning society it is indeed better to invest educational resources broadly to have everyone do a bit better. However, in many scientific disciplines (and especially in areas such as mathematics and theoretical physics) it seems most progress comes from a small number of high impact individuals (e.g. Newton, Einstein, Feynman etc). Thus, for robust scientific progress you should actually direct your educational resources towards the most promising kids.

Ultimately then your preferred distribution of educational resources depends on your values. If you care more for scientific progress than for social issues, then it is rational to favor targeted rather than broad spending of educational resources.

I personally do care about both, but faced with a choice I'd go for scientific progress because ultimately advances in science, technology and medicine prove to be the best way to reduce human suffering.