skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
ISOs convert to NQOs once a certain amount of time has passed after leaving the organization, so there's not much difference there.

Having ISOs matters most when the underlying shares are illiquid, and you can defer the tax obligation until a sale event (provided you don't hit AMT). When you have a 7-10 year exercise window, the company will likely have IPO'ed or have failed. The tax benefit of ISOs are greatly diminished.
Could I set my own subject? It looks like a nice UX to help with general writing too.
You disagree in terms of diction.

No, there really is a pretty massive material difference between a startup employee and an indentured servant. It takes extreme naiveté or extreme privilege to confuse these two concepts.
Uber’s position is that if it learns [of a sale or loan] that goes around its share-transfer restrictions, there will be consequences

What consequences?
Don't you think it's possible to benefit from someone's expertise while recognizing and taking into account their inherent bias? It's generally difficult to find the former without some degree of the latter.
Seems to me you actually want all three assertions checked in the same run. Otherwise you could get three runs where only the first assertion was true in the first run; only the second assertion succeeding in the second run with the others failing; etc.

I bet the tests aren't pixel-by-pixel frame-by-frame reproducible (they are talking about a one week staging period for tests to prove themselves, so surely there's some non-deterministic wiggle room in remote controlling the full graphical client), so you really want to cover all assertions together for each run.
Frankly institutional investors still have leverage over founding teams, and unless the company is a "darling" that has investors fighting for cap space, being "nonstandard" will be a possible liability.

Laughing at the question is obviously uncalled for, but there are legitimate cause for concern for adopting such policies.

Currently, late stage high growth companies and YC companies are the two segments best positioned to negotiate against VCs for these terms to become "standard".
You seem to be fighting a battle on several fronts, our thread was about opposition to using polymer over paper, nothing at all about who's on what bill.

That said, I find it not at all surprising that you, identifying as a right-leaning person, dismiss all scientific surveys and studies as leftist propaganda. That's a common calling card of the Tea Party. I didn't link to all Tea Party sites because I didn't want you to claim I was only linking to fringe websites. Seems it wouldn't matter what I linked to. Facts don't have much sway over belief.

Edit: actually two of my sources were Tea Party sites, not one, and anti-vaccine movement is rather bipartisan - that doesn't mean loud voices in the Tea Party aren't strongly anti-vaccine. Read the articles linked. http://www.vice.com/read/weird-politics-of-anti-vaxxers-203
Sure beats being a 30something "leftover" woman in China because China.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheng_nu
At least there's a plausible route and mechanism there. How do you see this applying to an uncle?
I don't know, I want to like Rust, but every time I pick it up I feel like I'm relearning C++. It's learning curve is steep, the sorts of applications I write benefit more from solid development velocity and a good concurrency story. I might be wrong, but I get the feeling that Rust really only shines where performance and meticulous control are paramount. I want to like it, but it feels ill-suited to the applications that interest me. :(
tldr

" Almost all culture, old or new, is designed for consumption by people under 40"

== people over 40 are free pressures of culture == immortality

Rest of the article is filled with smart sounding incoherent fluff like this

> culture is built around the game of a meaningful search for eternal truths, timeless values and changeless habits of prowess.

No. culture is built to improve biological fitness of the population.

This seems to be written by someone who harbored strange and misguided misconceptions about life, truth, reality and culture and is now realizing all that he believed in has no value at all.
They give 'em the ol' cement shoes.
magical thinking

These two words describe most of psychology. It's not a science[1]. I've always thought that people who study psychology are just trying to figure themselves out.

[1] http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/13/news/la-ol-blowback-...
Yes, sure! Prompts are there to help people to get started, but feel free to ignore them if you want.

In the future I will probably add preferences allowing people to disable the functionality they don't use.
Papers don't do anything. Papers aren't executable. Papers are largely only useful in regards to writing other papers. To make the whole point of the exercise to be something that is inert and self-referential is the fetishization part.
Which direction is that (honest question, I suspect US -> EU being easier, but I recall companies having trouble "importing" Americans as well...)?
No, I don't think there is an easy solution. It is expensive for the foundry (TSMC, GlobalFoundries, Intel, Samsung, etc.) and it is also expensive for the EDA companies that create all the necessary tools (Synopsys, Cadence and Mentor).

Even if the EDA companies were to provide all of the tools for free, the startups would be facing the high costs from the foundries.

But to tell you the truth, there is not much incentive to design in the newest node if you don't have money to spend. The technology not only is expensive but it is also unstable.
Levis 501s have buttons, Levis 505s are the same but with zippers.
The end result was not papers. The point was products. The papers were a byproduct. For most academic institutions, the entire point is the paper, whether it's useful to anyone or not.
To elaborate, it's spelled out in even standard option plan paperwork.
Try a different exit node, the website uses Cloudflare so if you could access HN you should be able to access that one as well.
They'd soon be drowning in individual tests. And it wouldn't necessarily fit to separate them, considering all those 3 have to be tested on each skill usage. One shot has to obey those 3 rules.

Making each an individual test would triple the test time, pollute the test codebase and not bring any advantage.
> For instance, there's a ton of Go repositories out there that are not go gettable because the author wanted to put source code under a src directory and hacked that together using make.

Are there? If someone's that ignorant of the language, I don't think I'd want to run something written by him …

> And good luck with organizing any repository that contains multiple languages where go is one of them...go's "code lives at the repository root" doesn't play well with others.

I've actually built libraries which involved both Go & Python without a problem.
Researcher time-estimate translation table: https://xkcd.com/678/
re 3: If it were for correctness, I'd agree. But I don't need volatile to make it work, I need it to produce the assembly I want. If one instruction can execute only on Port 1 (popcnt) and the other can execute on Ports 0, 1, 5, or 6, there's sometimes a 50% performance difference based on the order two seemingly independent instructions are executed. Volatile also prevents the compiler from hoisting loads ahead of my inline assembly, which sometimes makes a difference. Clobbering "mem" might force other reloads that I don't want to happen.

re 5: Barring compiler bugs, I think you'd be right if correctness was the only issue. But I'm pretty sure I've sometimes solved problems by adding it, although this may have been when working around the POPCNT bug that added a false dependency on the output. It also might have been when reading and writing a variable multiple times?

re 6: In theory, yes. But usually in these cases you should be writing intrinsics or straight C instead of inline assembly. The place where this comes up most for me is when I have two variables that use the same index, and I want to ensure "DEC/JNZ" fusion at the end of the loop. If I let the compiler choose, it will find a way to defeat me by incrementing both array addresses. The other case is when you explicitly want a store to use Port 7 for address generation, which only happens without an index register.

re 7: Yes, I just personally find it more confusing because "x" fits so well with "XMM", and thus it feels odd to use it when you want only a "YMM". Also, see here for problems with a Clang and %q[VEC]: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34459803/in-gnu-c-inline-...

re 4: Oops, I forgot to renumber. I had another comment suggesting that one always use the "V" VEX prefix on vector commands and the explicit output register, but deleted it because it seemed off topic.
Smaller line size doesn't mean more compute power any more. Clocks maxed out around 3GHz some years ago. For CPUs, getting rid of the heat has become the limiting factor. (Yes, with aggressive cooling you can go faster, but most systems don't go there.) Electromigration is starting to limit component lifespans.

But that's for CPUs. Memory, especially mostly-inactive memory such as flash devices, still has a few iterations ahead. Memory devices can tolerate and recover from bad cells and bad rows. There's also the option of going 3D and stacking memory. That doesn't work for CPUs because getting the heat out of the middle is very tough.

The other big problem is cost. Fabs have become multi-billion dollar projects. The article says that designing an SOIC for 7mm costs upwards of $200 million. (Why? Design tools? Mask making?) If cost per gate declines, we can still get more compute power by making bigger parts with more CPUs. Single CPU performance probably isn't going to climb much more, though.

Fortunately, most of the things we want to do in machine learning and AI can be done in parallel. This problem isn't going to keep us from getting to AI.
My guess would be that it derives from the mathematical notation for sums.

But apart from that, I think using i,j,k as index variables in for-loop has become such a de-facto standard that I would only prefer long names such as "count" or "index" in situations where multiple indices may cause confusion. But then I'd probably use even more specific names than "count" or "index".
That's seriously awesome. You can get tiny FPV wifi quadcopters for pocket change from China these days, seems like the Pyra would be a perfect companion device.

Regarding CRRCSim, that's fantastic news. I'd never even heard of that sim. I got my first full-size CP helicopter last year and have only managed to not crash it by extensive sim practice in "HeliSimRC". It looks like CRRCSim can handle helicopters - if so, it's just about the perfect on-the-go timewaster program for me; even has the same control layout as the real thing!
Would you mind maybe saying what exactly that you loved ; perhaps in normal language.
Reply to myself since I cannot edit: Depending on how much storage you need, it might be cheaper to get a dedicated server or colo your own versus getting a virtual machine. Feel free to reply if you have questions on this.
GRE doesn't matter, many CS programs don't even require it

The GRE isn't irrelevant.
Good point. Research software is always far from production quality and researchers don't get into research to write production software. To publish software, it has to build and run on all reasonable platforms, and users should be able to read, understand and modify the code. All this effort distracts the researcher from doing research. (Unless we redefine research as working on software.)
Great sum up of Tarkovsky! Legend.
The Challenges of Partially Automated Driving
We've only had our Echo a couple weeks, but we've already found that characters named Alexa in TV shows are a problem, and that at least once it has responded to something that wasn't "Alexa" from the TV. So yeah, it definitely has false positives.
Berlin is a poor city. In fact it's former mayor famously described it as "Poor but sexy". It doesn't have the liberty of increasing supply on it's own to a large extent. You also can't increase supply, no matter how much you want to, in the districts everyone wants to live in. Getting a place outside of it can be accomplished fairly easily.
Uber has a secret weapon in its quest for world domination
It looks that way:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ChUw89lW4AA7rc-.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CdRk7oEWwAEYRNq.jpg
Hmm. I've heard that Uber does have a stock buyback plan in place for employees.

Maybe there are limitations on how much can be exercised/sold, so that someone with $300mm post-option exercise can't exercise their whole position.
I think you'll have a good experience with the integration. Go is the only language I know of where tooling is mostly painless. If you can manage to grok the notion of GOPATH, everything else pretty much just works--even in vim, all you have to do is install vim-go and you get code completion, automatic formatting, jump-to-definition, test execution, coverage reporting, compilation/compilation-error-reporting, etc etc all out of the box (vim-go just wrangles a bunch of programs that provide these facilities, which mean they can also be wrangled for other editors as well).
Adapteva has done chips for <$2M AFAIK, definitely <$5M, at 28 nm. Of course few chips are like theirs in terms of design simplicity relatively to their large size except for bitcoin miners. For $10M however you should be able to do pretty big designs with lots of licensed IP, heavyweight simulation acceleration etc. A breakdown of real projects involves violating NDAs.

Below 28nm their numbers become really deranged. This overstatement is IMO peddled by big name chip companies trying to convince analysts that FinFET nodes give them a moat. In reality the end of Moore's law means they'll face vicious competition.

Of course nothing prevents you from spending huge amounts of money. Buy an ARM architecture license - there goes $30M and that's before you pay for developing your own ARM-compatible CPU.
There should be a website that keeps track of how many bits is the largest quantum register that someone has managed to build.
I recently learned that Instacart has a 7 year exercise window, and they are not on this list.
Alerts are push anyway at the moment - so sending multiple Prometheus alerts to a single alertmanager is easy.

But yes, the actual "alert firing" metrics are exposed by the federated endpoints.
They weren't literally "handcuffed" either.

Have you ever used the term "piracy" to describe unauthorized copying rather than attacking and plundering ships on the high seas?
Can you say more? Many, many businesses bet their workloads on Google Container Engine and has been GA for nearly a year with a 99.95% SLA, was there something about it that we could do to demonstrate that it's robust or proven better?

Disclosure: I work at Google on Google Container Engine
In the paper they discuss how x86 isn't even dense, & barely competes with ARM's constant width instructions
I'm assuming they are the ones listed here: https://peter.bourgon.org/talks/
Yeah, the way I see it it's a convenience feature at best - if you car can't brake in time for the people around the corner, it has no business driving the current speed. In the end, you can't rely on other cars telling you it's safe - that's bad engineering.

There are second order benefits, like slowing down with less acceleration, so your coffee won't spill, but compared to the infrastructure investment and privacy issues, those things are really negligible.
Lead iOS Developer for Video Social Network
Lead iOS Developer | Mango Technologies, Inc | $90-$120K | Up to 3% Equity

Are you highly motivated and passionate about creating things that change the lives of millions of people?

Do you want the opportunity to play an integral part in building something amazing from the ground up?

If you love creating meaningful applications and working relentlessly to make a difference, you'll fit right in!

We are a team of 6 young individuals working to create an application solving a real life problem we all experience.

Videos get lost in your phone, pictures bring little value, and traditional social networks have turned into an ego trip.

This platform is about capturing moments (up to one minute) as they happen, storing them intuitively, and sharing them sparingly.

You:
* Native Swift & Obj-C
* Experience with video and camera

More information and current design can be shared in depth after completion of NDA.

We're looking for a motivated individual seeking a long-term relationship with a passionate group of kids that want to make awesome products.

https://mangotechnologies.co/

Apply: Brian -> b@mimri.co

Thanks!
Hopefully you'll combine that idiom with "make the zero value useful" so that omitted fields still give valid behavior.
> it comes from long experience and reflection about what makes for good HN conversations.

In your long experience, how is this detrimental to good HN conversations?
Totally agree with this is why especially FB is winning. Especially in Mobile where every user is pretty a logged in user on FB, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc. Plus non-inferred actual demo data. Even Google can't touch FB...

Everyone else who's peddling non-logged impressions with BlueKai data, good luck - first, Bluekai is only accruage 1/3 of the time. Second, majority of those are bot views.

Attribution like you describe is notoriously hard to measure. As views get to mobile, FB wins again since most apps use FB auth.
Card sorters are not linear time. They're number of cards x number of columns of sort key. Sort keys, if unique, have to have size O(log N), so card sorters are O(N log N), as you'd expect.

You can beat O(N log N) with a radix-like sort (SyncSort, the first software patent, shows how), but you need more bins than a card sorter has.
At least in programming languages, systems, and formal verification project code is both available and often evaluated along side the publication. For example FSCQ(https://github.com/mit-pdos/fscq-impl) from MIT, Verdi (https://github.com/uwplse/verdi) from UW, Dune(http://dune.scs.stanford.edu/) from Stanford, and many more.

These are just the areas I work in, its very hard to making sweeping statement about CS as a full field since it is very diverse sub-community to sub-community.
I'm not a gamer [which I presume is the target market], so the yukky keyboard puts me off. Otherwise I'd be quite into this, as a mini laptop.
>How could Jesse inherit something from an uncle who had died before he was born?

Is it much different from elephants being born with 'genetic memory' of migratory routes that their forefathers took

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/jan/13/conservat...
But what if C(1) and C(2) are not exactly the same size?

Say you want to resume continuation K, which has a stack of some size N.

The current thread has a stack of size M. If M >= N, everything is fine: you can safely overwrite the current stack with K's stack.

If M < N, recurse until M >= N.

You could try to snapshot the entire C stack to get around this, including the outermost C frames.

Indeed! This is a solution.

It wouldn't be acceptable...

I like doing unacceptable things in my programs. It's the best part of programming, really.

There are a lot of solid arguments against call/cc. I think the most persuasive argument in favor of call/cc is that you become more powerful. Whatever metric you use to measure power, call/cc will improve it: Smaller code, less time spent writing code, and you can even write algorithms that you otherwise would not be able to.

Personally, I want call/cc in order to be able to use choose and fail. It's the ability to write programs that are guaranteed to never call fail(). pg explains it well:

"For example, this is a perfectly legitimate nondeterministic algorithm
for discovering whether you have a known ancestor called Igor:

Function Ig(n)
if name(n) = ‘Igor’
return n
if parents(n)
return Ig(choose(parents(n)))
fail

The fail operator is used to influence the value returned by choose. If we
ever encounter a fail, choose would have chosen incorrectly. By definition choose
guesses correctly."

Call/cc makes this possible. There are a lot of fun things to do. The last few chapters of On Lisp show some particularly interesting sketches.
Yes, that's a great link, and I agree that if you can get the performance you want with Intrinsics they are usually a better choice. But if you need compiler-portable high performance, I find that it can be really hard to get good performance on GCC, ICC, and Clang simultaneously with intrinsics.

Another approach that's not quite there yet but is becoming more possible is to use https://www.cilkplus.org to annotate your C code to force automatic vectorization. It's native to ICC, built-in to GCC 5.0+, and available as an extension to Clang: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11550250
The Thing Employers Look for When Hiring Recent Graduates
What about Ferienwohnungen that existed before AirBnB was even a thing? I travel to Dresden every couple of months and stay in a Ferienwohnung in the Neustadt that's been around for at least eight years. I guess under Berlin's new rules that would be gone.
That overzealous secrecy around TTIP is a shame.
It doesn't look like such a bad piece of legislation. The overall theme seems to be some deregulation on EU side (as generally EU is the over-regulated side) and bringing regulatory standards closer together.
The IP protections are the most concerning part so far IMO?

I don't know much about that kind of negotiations, the secrecy might as well be the right strategy to push it through I guess?
Papers teach people things. You can't really hand someone some working code and expect them to iterate on it to produce something novel and insightful, because it won't be written in a high-enough language to express the core concepts flexibly.
But in the article it says towards the end that Berlin in building 50K new units in the next 10-15 years. So in addition to banning AirBnB they are also increasing supply. I am unsure how or why "technology" plays into it unless you mean construction technology?
Removing residential units from the long-term lease market and turning them into overnight units does not increase supply, it actually reduces the number of units available for lease.

This raises the equilibrium for lease units: less units available, higher prices. Not to mention the fact that leasers are now competing against people paying higher nightly rates.
I don't think I really understand what you mean. What he said was that it stays at 10 years indefinitely. Either way, x+10 and e^x both go to infinity, so I guess the conclusion is the same, right?
Does it, though? If I understand correctly the exponential distribution means we will have an expected waiting time of X years between two occurences but does it also hold when there is just a single event?

I mean to say that the introduction of a quantum computer is just a single, once occurring event.
The principle is interesting!
IMHO the GIFs on the home page slightly lack clarity. They could be slower and the choice of what should be labeled could be better.
In addition, some orders of magnitude of the expected storage capacity vs size would be insightful.
“Largely just men doing sums”: Aaronson's review of the Ramanujan film
On a somewhat related note, could anyone recommend a legitimate way to find mid-term rentals(3-6 months)in Berlin? Or possibly a month or two on the shorter end?
Stanford created a name generator using deep net. They sound like hipster names
The writing prompts are rather specific; I think a good writing prompt should be more open to interpretation.
Download FIFA 16 Cracked PC Game Super Deluxe Edition Crack