skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Yes.

The only costs that would occur would be transaction fees for changing state in the Ethereum network (which is only required once for registering the service and at the order of half a cent at the current scalability level) and a similar amount for opening and closing the payment channels. I'm currently implementing a prototype extending http://hug.rest. If executed correctly, the following three lines of Python:

@hug.get("/pay_world", requires=pay("$0.001"))
def pay_world():
return "You paid for this"

would result in the framework generating the OpenAPI spec amended with the payment metadata in the background and making it available under the service root. A middleware layer would check every ingoing request for payment signatures, closing the payment channel if necessary. Interesting things would become possible, although it is not clear if it all will succeed. Many different kinds of payment mechanisms would be conceivable, from pay-per-call to subscription based. Hypothetically, you could even pay APIs with gold backed cryptocurrency or tokens you issued yourself.

See here for a similar project and reasoning: https://github.com/etherapis/etherapis
You talk to them, like they're people or something? What is this witchcraft?

But seriously, I do the same thing. Have them look over some broken code for 10 minutes to collect their thoughts then have a discussion about the issues they found and various tangent topics relating to it. I'm amazed how uncommon this is.
I was under the impression that since the page returned 404 after being posted here, they removed the ability to search using these filters, at the very broad range it was used at.

Now the page is back and I'm not sure what to make of it.
Well, not in the US. The money paid to employees is tax-deductible to the business, so it's only taxed once (the employee pays taxes on the money paid to them, but the business doesn't.)
I think it's perfectly reasonable to expect that only Google has access to your stored emails. Not just any government agency whose lawyer drafts a letter.

Would you permit the government, or any random person off the street to remove money from your bank account, just because you've authorized your bank to do so?
"In a market economy, wealth accrues to those who solve people's problems the best."

By passing large sums of money from generation to generation, you end up with a class this won't apply to. It'll be the family of some relative long since past who once upon a time, solved some problem the best.
I'm waiting for the first news stories about house fires caused by USB-C chargers. A faulty 5Vx1A charger will melt, 20Vx5A will be a bit more lively.

The tests by people like Benson Leung [1] haven't given me any faith that manufacturers will actually care about getting the specs right.

[1]: https://plus.google.com/collection/s0Inv
I was prompted to try an OCaml tutorial by this HN post. I soon saw that strings and numbers each have a different print function. Is this part of the cruft you mention? Why have two print functions?
If we would simply hold people liable for the consequences of their actions we would not need DUI laws or breathalyzer "implied consent" attached to driving.
I am impressed that they implemented auto-hydrating streaming server-side rendering. Is there any other package that does this as streams?
> unless you want severe automatic penalties

Isn't that basically how traffic tickets work in general? As far as I understand it, you have the option of rejecting the ticket as long as you're willing to be arrested for the offense instead.
Distributed under the MS-RL License.

To further explain the license:

You cannot re-license any files in this project.
That is, they must remain under the MS-RL license.
Any other files you add to this project can be under any license you want.
You cannot use any of this code in a GPL project.
Otherwise you are free to do pretty much anything you want with this code.
If I misread the intent of your comment then I apologize. But context does matter and in context, your statements carried a fair amount of meaning with little explanation. I don't want to suggest that you said that someone should be forced to release their code; but your short statement seemed to stake a moral claim. A claim I don't see as valid. If I'm wrong, I'd be interested to know what you actually meant.
> No reasonable interviewer expects you to recollect breadth-first search flawlessly, on demand, onto a whiteboard.

Wait, really? I've had to do more than that just for internships, the bar for perfection at many companies is just that high or higher.

I agree with the rest of what you're saying.
How do you obtain someone's IP address over Twitter? This can't be real.
You want to read Alexis de Tocqueville's comments on early American inheritance law; it's always been structured to try to prevent the accumulated heritable wealth and power that built the European aristocracies, and the estate tax is simply one tool in that toolbox.
@hype7 is correct. To others in the thread, I don't mind Canada's system - basically, tax the income from (the potential) full liquidation of assets. In many cases, everything needs to be liquidated before an estate is divided anyway. Income gained would be taxed anyway. That said, I don't live in Canada so I don't know the finer points.

To those speaking of multi-generational wealth, I'll bypass the "it's bad" argument and point greatly towards the "1/10 of 1 percent" that have gained something like 90% of all newly created wealth in the past couple decades (and the innumerable ways they can keep that wealth from the estate tax) as evidence of it being a failed policy, again only hurting those somewhere in the middle.
Should've used Never10.

https://www.grc.com/never10.htm
Same reason RAID-5 doesn't work on for large disks. If you have a dozen 3TB drives in an array and one dies, the probability that you'll get a read error on another drive during the rebuild is quite high.

Given enough bits, random errors that individually are almost impossible become almost a certainty.
>More often than not, short-term demands made by Wall Street guide business decisions in increasingly poor ways

Do you have any evidence that this occurs "more often than not"? I look around America, and the world, and see a ton of successful public companies. Hundreds. Thousands even. Some of them have been around for over a century.

What you're saying is exactly the type of thing someone would say as they try to wrest control from other owners; that everything will fall apart if they're not in charge. Silicon Valley likes to paint this picture of the "genius founder", but it's rarely the case in reality. If Zuck was abducted by aliens tomorrow, Facebook would live on.
the Breathalyzer measures nothing but alcohol

If you read some of the history of the devices and their use, I'd argue the correct statement is "the Breathalyzer does not measure anything". The number of inaccuracies and outright bugs in both the hardware and software are appalling, considering the increasingly-draconian penalties associated with their use.
Go work for a week in a warehouse or a factory and you'll understand.
Postgrest is one of the most underrated projects out right now for automating api creation. Easy to work with, reliable, and scalable. It motivated me to learn Haskell also.
I'm genuinely curious as to where you are getting your information from - ? Are you referring to Xamarin Forms in particular? One isn't forced to use Forms, it's possible to utilise Xamarin iOS and Android, but still have (for example) a PCL that contains everything except for the visual side of things.
FuckI'mDoingIt,PostingSomethingIWrote:A Convergence of Culture and Communication
I can't post the whole thing here due to character limit.

...A new bbs..

...something almost exactly like a .torrent file...

...a peer-to-peer protocol, a means to collectively yet independently, in great synchronicity, network our information...

...information within this system is either a location or syntax or content...

...all entries start with the location of the entry itself...

...location is generated by combining all relevant IDs and the sequence number...

...this allows for a predicable means to sequence entries...

...syntax contains content, content can contain syntax...

...design an expansive syntax for causes and effects, must include syntax for tables, text, vectors, and functions...

...syntax must be substantial enough a platform to describe theories, readable by humans and computers...

...convert descriptions of theories and models into this syntax...

...content: everything else. Content type declared in the containing syntax, the rules of the content’s interpretation either declared from within the container or referenced from elsewhere. Content to frequently be code, raw information, executables...

...content can reference and use the syntax of any other entry...

...within content, referenced syntax can contain content referencing syntax from another entry...

...content can hold computation within objects...

...an easy means to conduct p2p computation...

...objects can have any combination of inputs and outputs, objects can be of any size...

...computation within objects is propelled by a computation scheme, computed by the individual computers hosting the content...

...thus [de|a]scends the nesting nature of this structure...

This is part of the thing! I guess I'm just testing the water with this. Also, when I originally wrote this, the scope encompassed political activity which I am also passionate about.

I'm trying to get a team together to work on this with me, basically. Volunteers only :).
Good luck feeding your family with the sales of a proprietary compression algorithm.
Except the estate tax is often a much, much larger percentage than normal income tax.
原本想用angular2作为项目基础框架，阴差阳错用了vuejs，配合其他插件做spa，现在已经非常喜欢它了，更新到2.0这个里程碑，恭喜。
Cool. Thanks. It's the definition of unanimous that's a little fishy. I thought it meant everyone voted Yes for it whereas even a 1 to 0 vote could pass as unanimous, right?
It's not a 'death' tax. It's an inheritance tax that is paid by the person receiving the money. If he doesn't let relatives inherit enough of his wealth, then none of it gets taxed.
No. if you have a tree, you get an iterator on that tree, and print each element. Because your a pro, so of course your tree is based on a well-tested library component, one that provides a way to iterate it.
Ummm... yes?
Thanks. I'm certainly open to that possibility too.
Closed network with locked down terminals?
If SpaceX Succeeds at this, we're going to have to update that term...
Hiring is broken if it weeds out people who don't interview well, rather than people who don't code well.
the fairtax organization has proposed a "prebate" to mitigate regressiveness.

https://fairtax.org/about/how-fairtax-works-slideshow
He posted to the support forums:

https://forums.grsecurity.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4342
Not really. The ticket is just documentation of the officer's charge that you violated whatever law. You can sign it or not, tear it up, you'll still be on the docket at the local courthouse at some date in the near future, and if you don't show up you'll get a bench warrant for failure to appear.
Except that you can write off salaries.
VueJS is very similar to Riot, worth a look.

http://vuejs.org
Same goes for communication: one reply is a conversation, a million replies is harassment!
> But scheduling meetings on the go is still difficult

Really? Is this really the biggest challenge in anyone's day?
The defense I kept telling Schneier et al to post, but haven't seen, is how susceptible our dirty Congress is to blackmail. Probably have to be a closed session to get the honesty there. We can present it less like they're scumbags and more like "we know how the world works so let's be real about risk to you and therefore rest of us." I heavily pushed on different blogs extrapolating the Hoover precedent to NSA-level capabilities.

I think it's the best route as it's in their self interests. I think getting the business and international elites on board might be helpful as well. Unfortunately, they often push for surveillance or police states since they're good for business at various levels. However, even a minority push might hold back the worst legislation while letting whatever passes contain a loophole big enough for them and maybe some of us. Plus, they have the money to fund key solutions in the stack.

So, those are two ideas I've pushed in the various debates.
>As a side bonus, with proper encryption you can be sure that network errors which corrupt your packets are not going undetected

Shouldn't you be verifying a MAC before decrypting anyways? Relying on decrypting scrambled data, especially for a bitflip, seems like a bad idea.

>Potential attack here is about attacker modifying the (unencrypted/unsigned) data coming to the victim’s Client,

So establish a session key, and include an HMAC on each message? Or not even a session key, if you're worried about re-establishing sessions, but a long-term per-client key (or per-install or whatever). Hardly seems like you need QUIC/DTLS for this simple scenario.

Then all the part about DDoS'ing a UDP connection establishment... Why not just use TCP for sign-in and key establishment, and get 3-way handshake for free. That eliminates spoofing IPs. From there, just have monitors that determine when you're "under attack" and rate limit by IP address, just like any anti-DDoS does. Coming up with all this other stuff seems like an overly complex way.
Wikipedia stats are painful to browse, but here are some numbers:

Al-Qaeda / US Army / ISIS in January 2016

http://stats.grok.se/en/201601/Al-Qaeda (~ 3k / day)

http://stats.grok.se/en/201601/United%20States%20Army# (~ 2.5k / day)

http://stats.grok.se/en/201601/Islamic%20State%20of%20Iraq%2... ( ~15k / day)

Al-Qaeda / US Army / ISIS in May 2013 (before Snowden's revelations & before ISIS/ISIL was known in the West[0])

http://stats.grok.se/en/201601/Al-Qaeda (~ 5.8k / day)

http://stats.grok.se/en/201601/United%20States%20Army# (~ 3.5k / day)

My conclusion, traffic is probably changing due to what is in the news rather than anything else. If the US Army is sent in to invade another country, their wikipedia page will be back on top.

ISIS was way higher last year, average about 25k/day in the middle of 2015, but the news media are tiring of them and they are also fading away.

That said, I was about to send a completely legit email yesterday that had the keywords "pipe bomb", "suicide vest", "IED", "Al-Qaeda" and "Mali" in it (a friend just lost two of his men in Mali), but I decided to self-censor for the benefit of the recipient rather than myself.

[0] ISIS was technically announced at the end of April, but they were not well known and the page was just a stub. It fell below threshold for collecting page view stats.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Islamic_State_of_...
Sorry , was away for sometime.
Source for market share:
http://m.economictimes.com/industry/services/retail/indian-e...
Source for funding: actually I was wrong on this point. Amazon have invested $2B and flipkart till now had $3.3B funding.
Then why not tax everyone when they pass money/assets onto their kids? Why is there an arbitrary ~$5.1 million cutoff?

(Not that I have anywhere near that much money, but it's the principle)
With the ACLU and EFF backing, I'm not finding any significant negatives. On the other hand, this bill is so overdue that it leaves me wondering.
That's federal. In NJ, the line is $675k. It's different in other states, obviously.
I was not seriously suggesting the monks were manipulating the numbers; however, the lack of obvious motive does not imply an absolute lack of motive. It seems a little silly to attach any certainty to historical records without understanding the context, which may or may not be possible.
How the Rhetoric of Imposter Syndrome Is Used to Gaslight Women in Tech
This sounds cynical, but you're absolutely right: that value of a share in a company which will never return capital to its shareholders is precisely zero. People find that hard to believe, but it's true. Why would the last "greater fool" pay anything for it? Work backwards from there.
How not to run an open source project.
That's why we have a quorum. Half of all seated Senators (51) are required to be present for the Senate to do business. For a House with no vacancies, half means 218 Representatives.

So you're right; fishy "unanimous" votes can and do happen. A controversial measure might pass unanimously in a legislative body because all the opposition walked out in protest. This happened about a month ago in the 50-seat North Carolina Senate, which is dominated by Republicans. [1]

[1] https://www.carolinajournal.com/news-article/senate-democrat...
As I understand it, this was a technical critique of a VR game intended for the developers to take and iterate with, and maybe for other developers to learn from as an example. It wasn't intended for people considering whether to actually play the game.
This talks about a "proof of work" system to mitigate DDoS. What's the "hello world" of such a system look like? It came up in a CTF recently and I had no idea where to start.
It litereally means two completely different architectures, on two physically disconnected computers. Here is a diagram: https://i.imgur.com/Tj0GKbQ.png

Also visible in the diagram is that each side has its own watchdog, both connected to each other. The way this whole thing work is fail safe, so if one computer fails the backup can jump in, and if that fails too the flight controls will either retract or stop in their current position depending on what makes the most sense. It’s also mirrored, so for example if spoiler 2 on the right wing fails and is retracted, spoiler 2 on the left wing will also retract.

Here is a description about the flight controls and how pilot input gets passed through to the control surfaces: http://www.smartcockpit.com/docs/A320-Flight_Controls.pdf

And here is a general overview about the architecture: http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/2313.pdf
You don't need to use an IDE in order to write Xamarin.iOS or Android apps. You can just use a text editor (although Xamarin Studio is free).

The MSBuild logic, at least for Xamarin.Mac and Xamarin.iOS has been made completely open source, so all the logic to build your apps + the SDKs are all open source.
It's a tangible thing. People STILL have issues paying for something that isn't physically in their hands.
I get what you mean, but it is still a downside for the format.

"contact us" pricing is fine and all, but it means it's irrelevant to me most of the time. Their software could be the coolest; but the chances of them taking an individual seriously are probably low.
> Are you seriously comparing MZ pledging to spend millions on fighting disease and poverty around the world to the (actual) rape, murder and conquest of thousands of people?

I'm seriously suggesting that wanting to have an impact on the world doesn't imply anything positive.
>Hm, kinda strange, I was always under the impression that we didn't quite yet have a public consensus that there's an expectation of privacy in email. Like, not everyone really expects that a given email won't be read by some third party.

Never understood those US ideas on such matters. Nobody would want/expect/wont be furious to find out their two party communication was read by somebody else who wasn't meant to get it (and I don't mean show to some third person by your correspondent).

It's not gauging the public belief/sentiment on the matter, but BS ad-hoc "interpretations" of legacy laws allowed courts/pundits to even make such inane claims that people don't expect privacy for their mails.

If we're talking about expectations, then how about them asking people what they expect DIRECTLY (eg with a state/national poll) instead of some court deciding.
> however there was clearly demand for personal transportation and portable music players.

I think that makes my point further. There is demand for social networks

I'll concede that portability may or may not be the next big thing for social networks. Let's speak more generally.

People want better social networks. They want to connect with friends more easily. To be honest, my Facebook feed is improving bit by bit, but it's still not as good or interesting as it could be. My perception is that Facebook is 100% focused on improving the feed, but without competition, we'll never have anyone thinking outside the Facebook box. Mark has the final say on certain strategies, and I think his vision is great, but his company would be even greater if there were another Mark.

Jobs and Gates fed off each other. Their efforts to market computers to the world helped each other's businesses grow faster than they would've grown alone. By borrowing each other's ideas, we got better products. And their employees were constantly on their toes. Google and Facebook are amazing companies and provide more services to their employees today than Apple and MS in the 90s.

However, the same energy isn't there to improve their core products. Google could be much better at machine translation across all languages, which is part of search, for example. In the future, I think they will be. Without another real competitor, they're free to work on whatever side projects please their employees. The core products miss out on advancements that may otherwise arrive sooner.

All of this is fine and I think tech will thrive regardless. The reason I write all that is I believe in churning up ideas from the bottom that might not otherwise find support. I don't think I'm the only one with this idea.
Implied consent still generally (up to your state) requires reasonable suspicion. It would likely be unconstitutional to have an implied consent law to search your trunk (or your phone).

The breathalyzer has the immediacy requirement described elsewhere in this thread, which doesn't apply to your phone. The only reason to avoid getting a warrant is convenience.
If they're on a home email server, they always need a warrant. For hosted email, they don't require a warrant for older emails.
These Are Not the Logos of Medium AirBNB, Flipboard, and Beats
>I really don't even feel like reading these posts on this site anymore since they are filled with passive aggressive jealousy

I'll take that over unadulterated fawning over tech celebrities.
I use a separate music player just because I like non-singular points of failure.

The idea of carrying a single object that is your means of communication / music player / camera / train ticket / monetary instrument / entertainment center is neat, until you think about your battery dying / losing it / dropping it and having it crack in half when you're a hundred miles from home.

I guess it is less bad if you tend to travel in packs, and would always have a backup in that way.
Seems like you're not familiar with the history, yourself.

First and second wave feminism weren't coopted by upper middle class white women, they were founded by upper middle class white women. You can't get more white middle class than Anthony, Friedan, de Beauvoir et al.

Not that Wikipedia is a particularly good source, but your own link includes the sentence "Feminism at its core is a movement to abolish the inequalities women face" which is exactly what I said. A poor boy with troubles in Appalachia is tragic, to be sure, but is not any sort of feminist concern.

Intersectionality isn't a just way to garble up different justice concerns and call it "feminism." Intersectionality comes from the intersection of the axes of oppression on e.g. a black woman. The axes of oppression on a poor white man exist, but have little to do with feminism. This person lives in the privileged position under patriarchy, full stop.
I didn't say it can, i said "in fact, in most languages" (IE not C/C++). In C/C++, it's illegal for other reasons.