skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I'm wondering how Docker for Mac handles conflicting entries in /etc/exports. This is currently still a problem when using dlite and vagrant on the same host[1].

[1] https://github.com/nlf/dlite/issues/176
They often have you state particulars of the account details. MS will send you an email with a code that you must tell them.

In any case, one isn't more or less secure than the other. The physological effect of speaking to a phone just makes someone feel one is more safe. I'd say that if you send an email to the address you have on the account details, you can reasonably expect to get the right person to the same degree as you would when calling the phone number on the account.
Don't forget: https://github.com/ipfs/js-ipfs
Docker Goes native on non-Linux OS with latest beta
But you're also getting something for it in perpetuity.

People, I find, are simply irrational when it comes to monthly subscriptions. I'm a student with <1000E income and a monthly cost <20E doesn't even register; as long as I get something from it I want. If it's not big enough to induce a lifestyle change, what's the problem? So often I see people use Spotify and complain about the commercials, and I'm just like 'What is wrong with you? Literally nothing would change if you spent that money and clearly you would benefit from it. Why do you not do it?'
We are. We have our very own driver-less light rail in Vancouver: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SkyTrain_(Vancouver)
From the epilogue of the article:

The methods we found for solving the first problem don’t appear to help with the second problem, and vice versa. In fact, the two isolated solutions appear quite difficult to reconcile. The problem that these two papers leave open is: Can we get one algorithm that satisfies both properties at once?

A few paragraphs up:

The first property is about recognizing patterns about logical relationships between claims — saying “claim A implies claim B, so my probability on B must be at least my probability on A.” By contrast, the second property is about recognizing frequency patterns between similar claims — saying “I lack the resources to tell whether this claim is true, but 90% of similar claims have been true, so the base rate is 90%” (where part of the problem is figuring out what counts as a “similar claim”).

My question would be, is the "similar claim" problem not a relationship between claims and therefore pertinent to the first property and providing a link between the two problems?
>A passenger car takes roughly 315 feet to come to a complete stop. A fully loaded truck takes 525 feet.

How does this change if truck design and "per-axel" fee incentives were rationalized[1][2] to instead maximize the number of axles? Doubling the number of axles reduces road damage by 94%. Currently semi trucks account for 6% of vehicle miles driven[3] and 99% of all traffic damage to roads.

But would this measure also improve braking distance and safety?

[1] http://www.nytimes.com/1989/07/26/business/economic-scene-be... (erroneously states that damage scales as the cube of axle weight; it scales as the fourth power or even the sixth(!) power on weak roads)

[2] https://truecostblog.com/2009/06/02/the-hidden-trucking-indu...

[3] http://www.princeton.edu/~alaink/Orf467F13/FreightFacts&Figu...
OpenCL is very low level (sort of like Vulkan, which was actually inspired by it). Start with some easy wrappers, like PyOpenCL.
Virtue-signaller, know thyself.
OpenStack gender/diversity technical contributions analysis
Often some stuff is sold by third party dealers and shipped by Amazon. I suspect that is probably the case for the Macbook. Amazon typically has much lesser control over such sales, and would need to adhere to the dealer's policies.
Btw, I'd like to add that if you provide a simple way to cancel on the web, I'd be more than satisfied with it. If I send an email, I probably couldn't figure out where to cancel after 5-10 min.
Even if we remove all the facilities for a driver, i likely you would still need a human guard.

Although thinking about it, the guard could travel in a separate vehicle, and could be responsible for overseeing an entire convoy of trucks at one time.
>"Lower certainty required for a less drastic action."

If you consider what happens to male college students if they are accused of rape and found "guilty" to any degree by the university, then you wouldn't say it's a "less drastic action".

They get expelled, likely have their reputations and lives ruined. This is the reason we have courts, and it is the reason we don't give judge/execution rights to police.
Ant Financial gets $4.5b for China's payments war
In thise case, you can't use a read only mount. The underlying protocol is HTTP, which means you must write a request to the socket to get a response. You can use read only mounts for `/proc` however, which just spits out data. I use it for titpetric/netdata for example.
This is equivalent to an article arguing that 50 mb/s internet isn't fast enough and every community should be offered 100 mb/s internet, even if doing so causes large net losses to the providers.

They don't produce any evidence that the difference between one day and two day shipping has a negative impact on people's ability to increase the amount of available goods and obtain them at lower prices. Is there some mysterious perishable, necessary good that can only be ordered 24 hours in advance that unlocks upward mobility?
I am interested to hear more. I think I have a vague understanding of the problem but can you clarify your solution ? I am still a bit confused about what you mean by "cross-pollination of ideas and practices while enforcing various levels of privacy". Maybe providing an example will also be helpful.
You still need to go through GAAP (or some other ruleset) to figure out what goes into the E I T D and A of the EBITDA.
I wish this was a newsgroup.
Humankind. :-)

And I don't get to do anything other than dictate my own behavior, and try to express an idea. Sorry if that came off as dictatorial.

What I meant to say was: Anyone who would rather treat someone how they personally want them to be treated, rather than how the other person wishes to be treated, has forgotten The Golden Rule: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Rule

In terms of human relations in general, and in a very extreme sense, it's the social contract that allows people to co-exist without killing each other. Would you like someone to murder you because you insulted them? If not, it's best to treat people in the same way, that is, not murder them because they insult you. Or, perhaps, just not insult each other, lest you murder each other. But the point is you're caring about how the other person responds to what you do, because that may affect you at some point.

On a purely empathetic level, treating someone how they wish to be treated makes them feel better. That has a lot of benefits, for you and for them. And it basically doesn't cost you anything, other than the extra second it takes to be mindful of how you're treating someone.

And in general people who only think of themselves are selfish dicks. I certainly can't dictate to anyone not to be a dick. But it's in their interest not to be a dick.
20-30% is huge. And when trucking is no longer a huge source of employment, the political will to assess realistic taxes on the environmental/ infrastructural costs of trucking might increase. No worries of truckers staging protests that tax increases will come out of their paychecks.
Interesting. How do you build the code?
A quick Google "acme atari assembler" pointed me to:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/acme-crossass/

Is this correct?
The last two paragraphs are about a Uber like service which is different from the main subject of the article. However if I want to get my car back to where I parked it and not on the other side of the city, the last user must drive it back or BMW will. The first option will make the service totally unappealing, worse than all those failed parking to parking car sharing services. The second one costs money to BMW. So maybe the only users of this service are Uber drivers. They get my car for some hours, make some profit out of it, park it where I left it, go get another one. The cost of the rental must be low enough for them to make a meaningful profit though.
Addiction to Growth
What if both parties are incapable of giving consent?
WhereDat – “Google on steroids” (Hebrew)
Learn how to make a Network Time Protocol client in C
La ciudad de Haifa elimina el riesgo peligroso del wifi en las escuelas
Europe plans giant billion-euro quantum technologies project
Lionsgate Announcement – Steam
I'll vote you up mainly because I also wonder a bit about why this article is here. I haven't been around HN for that long, but even a year ago I seem to remember that the articles voted up were mainly technical in nature or related to startups. I have noticed that as discussion boards get more popular they seem to move to being platforms for expressing opinion on political subjects. It may be my imagination, but these kinds of topics seem to be becoming prevalent to the point where I'm seriously thinking of not checking in any more.

One may wonder why I am looking at the comments for such a topic, if I am not interested. To be honest, I'm wondering if I am the only such person. Possibly not.
I guess you've never gone to university then, because those places don't function without free pizza. It is the only reliable way to get students (and postdocs) to attend your event.

(Yes, I'm aware that attendance is the "price" for the pizza, but let's just say that cold pizza can still be had for free.)
That's a great idea
If I get told to 'ask the sales team for a quote', then sorry, I'll find another product or service that just provides the information up front. Would I be willing to pay their prices if I talked to the sales guys? Maybe, but it's still an extra inconvenience that's easier to avoid than go along with.

And no offence, but it's very unlikely your product or service is that unique that there's no viable alternatives out there. That don't waste everyone's time.
They are best for interactions with a time component. A UI doesn't work for things that should happen in the future because you won't be in the app in the future. A chatbot can just chat you. Notifications require an app install and add a lot of engineering complexity.
Immutable Infrastructure: Rise of the Machine Images [video]
Future teenagers version of cow tipping.
If you want to check out an amazing example of what was being done by some Atari 8-bit programmers at the time, check out "Alternate Reality: The City", a Datasoft game by Philip Price released in 1985. He used some really novel techniques to create a game that was visually and musically impressive for the time and architecture. Some of the techniques he employed (from an interview on Atariage.com a couple years ago)

>1. Knowledge of the names of registers was from magazine articles. I was self-taught for the most part. On the tricks with the hardware, that was just me thinking up what cool things I could do with the functionality of the hardware. Cycle counting to determine the position of the television electron beam, using a sliding window and emitting to the front and back of the current visual screen, using interrupts to change the color registers on each scan-line (combined with cycle counting and moving the player missiles to be at two places at once on the scan line),the 3D stuff, security, encryption, texture mapping, music driver, all self taught (no books).
I graduated from high school in 1996 and was way into web development from the very first days. I didn't end up coming out for the dotcom days, but I definitely have fond memories of those times. There was a sense of camaraderie of early PC and internet users where the motivations seemed to me to be slightly more noble. Not that the VCs or tech giants of the time weren't greedy—of course they were—but there wasn't the same kind of Hollywood feel where all the ambitious people were flooding out here gold-rush style.

If you went on Usenet / IRC back in the 80s/90s, there was this palpable sense that the internet would change the world. You could almost draw a direct line back to the counter-culture movement of the 60s, and those ideas which led to a lot of early software and networking work which we still benefit from today. The vast majority of people involved with computers back then were just drawn to them by their nature.

The problem today is that other sectors of the economy are really suffering, and software has become so easy that the bar to get started is so low, add the veneer of social media glorifying the whole thing and it lends itself to a circus atmosphere. Many people today choose tech as an arbitrary career path. I don't begrudge anyone their chosen path, but it has certainly led to a different vibe than what it used to be.

At the end of the day though, I have to admit to myself that it is probably simple nostalgia. Every generation thinks the old days were better as they age.
Isn't taking all reasonable steps to ascertain consent what the affirmative consent thing is all about?

It's one of those sensible things, like recycling, renewable energy, belief in evolution, or decent medical coverage, that somehow becomes a very bitter political issue for no logical reason.
Brendan at http://www.osdev.net is a CIA agent.

Brendan would say you must plan all the modes and all the instructions. Brendan would try to make you do too big a chunk and give up. Brendan tries to make people fail by expanding their notions and belitteling small things.
In the short-term, this is good for AirBnB now that it's clear that AirBnB pays extremely well. The floor is actually $250k--almost certainly everyone will look at their own resume and feel they have more experience than this new guy. I doubt the company can pay every SWE this rate as the minimum--otherwise, they would've publicly advertised this before.

I just don't think AirBnB can pay higher than Google in the long-term--are they really making $1M in revenue and quarter million per employee?
The justice system is unfair in that it requires "proof beyond reasonable doubt" or similar. Two wrongs don't make a right - if rape has occurred then it cannot be undone, but the potential miscarriage of justice has yet to occur so it is right that the system protects against that.

In the UK I've been on a jury for two sexual offence trials. The awesome (in the biblical sense) sense of responsibility we had was keenly felt and plenty of deliberation was had to double and triple check that we were, in the judge's words "sure" in finding a guilty verdict.

For its faults, and it has many, the Scottish system of three verdicts with "not proven" as another option makes some sense in these cases. In many instances there just isn't enough evidence and a plausible witness on each side of the case.
People just LOOVE to be outraged. For example in this thread people rage about google getting hands on their data. When I point out that the webmaster has to explicitly chose to share the data with google, I get downvoted. When I say that GA prohibits the use of PII, I get downvoted. It doesn't matter that I'm right. People WANT to be outraged. Reason, no reason, doesn't matter.
There is a ton of documentation yet, but here's a link to what there is:
http://www.chartjs.org/docs/#advanced-usage-writing-new-char...

It certainly isn't to the d3 level yet, but almost everything is exposed and extensible with the new API so you can create most any chart you can think of.
[Edit: just realised the original point was talking about beating the world's second best, not any opposition, so the All Blacks still don't come close to the 95% in the context originally mentioned]

That made me laugh (I'm a kiwi), but it's not just a feeling, it's not far off the truth. With Steve Hansen as coach the All Blacks' have won a staggering 92% of their games[1].

There's plenty of articles talking about how their dominance has increased through the professional era[2]. I'm not sure how likely it is to last though given just how many of our key players have left since the world cup, and historically I've NEVER felt confident of the outcome any time we play Australia.

[1] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/rugbyunion/international/ne...

[2] http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/sep/11/all-blacks...
Technically, under English law, I believe it isn't. The definition involves penetrative sex. It's normally something like sexual assault instead (arguably adding somewhat to gender politics).
Apple’s Watch Sales Estimated to Have Outpaced the iPhone in First Year
http://natmchugh.blogspot.com/2014/10/how-i-made-two-php-fil...

https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/md5collisions/a.php
https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/md5collisions/b.php

Obviously a contrived example, but given the above and other weaknesses md5 should not be considered safe for verifying file contents (at least from a security perspective).
Oh look, another article pushing the 'Bernie Bros' narrative. Do these people even consider that his support comes from people who want a better society, rather than some group of trolls that want to limit 'diversity' in politics?

Also, great job making your intentions clear to all the same people trolling your supporters, and providing ammunition for people who want to paint the Clinton campaign as corrupt. There is pretty much a 0.01% that this sort of 'reputation management/counter attacking' will not backfire horribly, especially on the internet where being seen as a 'shill' is one of the worst things that can happen to you.
Yeah. So every site and every product on the internet has this dark pattern. Do you use google? Youtube? StackOverflow? Are you outraged by them too?
It's certainly true that haggling and such have been around essentially forever, but scientific rigor hasn't. There are now entire generations of PhDs who have carefully studied these psychological phenomenon to maximize business' ability to squeeze every last drop of blood out of you. Meanwhile the consumer has been left relatively uneducated and unprepared to recognize and maneuver in this world.
Advanced Git tutorial on branches and how to use them effectively
I'ld love to try this. My docker id is: wichert
Presumption of Innocence is considered a human right by the United Nations. Manipulating the system to implicitly lessen the burden of proof is horrific.

But at least the intentions are noble. As the current police system's handling of rape cases is also horrific. However two wrongs don't make a right.
The secret behind iSight camera is a team of 800 people working solely on it
That was phenomenal. I constantly struggle with a lot of this - trying to distance myself from many aspects of the culture, without getting too cynical about it.

I think most of all, I just appreciate knowing that there is someone else kicking around in this city that feels the same way I do.
"Contact our sales team for a quote" == "Our prices are non-competitive and we know it" in my experience.
Everyone who has signed up for GA knows it. When you sign up you are asked 2 questions:

Do you want to share data with google to imrpove our products?

Do you want to pool your data for benchmarking purposes?

Both are unchecked by default. But here you go, I will search for "google analytics data sharing" for you.

https://support.google.com/analytics/answer/1011397?hl=en
As made explicit in the sexual assault policies of various US universities, a female is unable to consent if she's had any alcohol (the "1 beer" model of being drunk). It is not a defense, or grounds for a counterclaim, that the male might have been equally or more drunk. (I say made explicit; the "any alcohol" threshold is what's made explicit. The wording of formal policies is generally scrupulously gender-neutral, but their application isn't.)

In an actual US criminal court, I believe drunken consent is no different from any other consent.
An example of a law written with the (gender neutral) victim's interest in mind is that of statutory rape - you can contain all the consent you like but if the person is not viewed as being able to give it then an offence is committed.

Attempts to move looking for consent towards it being "engaged and enthusiastic" rather than posing a Yes/No question have potential - though it really needs to become a societal thing before a legal expectation. We don't live in the 50s where a woman was expected to lie back and think of England - it shouldn't be for a single partner to take "reasonable steps to ascertain consent", it should be something you are certain of or you stop and make sure. Not just because it's the right thing to do, but also because you're likely to have much better sex...
It's still not entirely impossible for a person without a male reproductive organ to engage in active penetrative sex with the aid of well, sexual devices which mimic the shape or even cruder devices. That's to say, I don't believe, but could be wrong, they stipulate being naturally born or some such uneasy language.
Adbhut Ghaas – Kisna
The idea is to use a two stage process:

1. take a sha1 hash of the last 4KB of each file.

2. for any equal hashes, compare the whole file.

With this method you should be able to skip reading many large files in their entirety.
Acquihires of companies that only have 2-5 members usually involve the entire team.
Think you nailed it on the head with your example - with food, you're fulfilling a necessary contract with your body. You have to eat, and even if the pizza is terrible and you're unhappy with it, you've satisfied the necessity of eating.

With the app, not only are you out a few dollars, you potentially commit the sin of wasting your time by not fulfilling any desires. Though the upside is exponential (in relation to the food), so is the downside.
A length check would catch the log file case. But really, just hash the whole file.

As an optimization, you might want to check for files with holes in them ("sparse" files). Not sure how to do that, though.
I'd recommend Altirra even if you're on Linux, it works well through WINE.
I think the discrepancy comes from advocacy thought vs. legal thought [1]. When advocating for rape victims, who are severely disadvantaged in these situations, you might make a statement like "we need to listen to the woman's perspective". As has been pointed out, that statement is a heuristic on several levels: the woman is often, but not always, the victim; and from a legal standpoint, there are of course other things to consider. It's still a useful and generally true statement.

When you're listening to "megaphone speech", you have to understand the context to understand the message. That can be difficult, because in most cases if you already understood the context, you wouldn't need to listen to the message. Try.

The flip side is also true, when activists win, and are given real institutional power, they must stop relying on context and start being precise ("gavel speech") with their intentions.

1: http://harvardlawreview.org/2015/02/trading-the-megaphone-fo...
Having a healthy amount of suspicion suspends judgements in the first place.

I skimmed the article as I had already heard most of it. No need to be so righteous. You could save yourself time (and everyone else for that matter) if you just worded your original comment a bit better; that's all I wanted to say in the first place. It's ironic that your post looks like propaganda when that's what you are so concerned about in the first place.
Warning: this project is GPL licensed
Facebook is working on a Snapchat-like camera app
X% of Configuration Is Never Used
What is more unique?

A 64 bit checksum + 64 bit filesize or a 128 bit checksum?
Meanwhile, cargo ship companies are looking toward automation and remote control to get humans off the water. Pirates aren't scared of humans being on board, and in some cases they prefer it, because a human crew is worth more ransom.
I did, I have the confirmation email right here, 7:42pm...