skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Sorry about that; I will get that page of the docs fixed.

Open invitation to anyone here: Our implementation of TUF via notary has been serving us well. If you decide to try it out and run in to any snags let me know and I can help you with getting it up and running. Contact info can be found in my profile.
Microsoft, Google (Seattle), Century Link, Group On, Moz, Redfin, Porch, Chef, White Pages... to name a few.

It's almost impossible to throw a dart at this list and not hit at least 5-10 - http://www.geekwire.com/geekwire-200/
The tl;dr is that it is attempting to reinvent parts of UML

The main page isn't cached, but at least one of the subpages is: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:DzlZ_Bs... (maybe they had no-cache on the front page and forgot(?) on the symbols page)

That's too bad, because I would have wanted to see this one: http://www.cavelanguage.org/language-specification (one need not click, it's the same "application error" page)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free-to-air ?
>There will be an environmental impact, but [...] not from the lack of mosquitoes in the ecosystem

Citation needed.
I read it as race being used as a stand-in or counter-example to that of gender. It's a point you have to think about, it provokes conversation rather than being an argument that stands on its own.
AutoCAD LT perhaps is the better comparison.
AutoCAD still does 3D. It's just the foundation for the MCAD BIM and Surface Modeling product verticals that dump a whole load of tools on top for those specific workflows.
>The amount of chemicals they pump out in the summer months is enough to sway me towards the belief that it can not be much if any riskier.

That's the spirit.

/s
Comparing the CLR and JVMs in terms of anything other than features is bizarre.

This is because the CLR/VES and JVMs are both examples of the actual important thing about general purpose computing: Computers can simulate anything, including “better” computers (that’s what Universal Turing Machine means).

But, when using one computer to simulate a “better” one, you’re always going to be giving up some raw performance that you don’t care about in order to get some features that you desperately want (after all, you are going through the enormous trouble of designing/implementing/running a simulation of another freaking general purpose computer).

Now, “better” can mean lots of things:

• The simulated computer has unbounded memory

• The simulated computer doesn’t (under|over)flow on arithmetic

• There are more people on the market that know how to program the simulated computer

• The simulated computer is more widely deployed

• The simulated computer is more secure/reliable

• The simulated computer is not controlled by a single faction

• The simulated computer readily runs programs encoded in your favorite language

• The simulated computer can easily simulate a computer that runs programs encoded in your favorite language (the subject of the article)

So, simulated computer A is strictly better than simulated computer B only in the following cases:

• A has the features that you want and B does not

• A and B both have the features that you want, but the former traded away significantly less raw performance than did the latter.

Since the CLR and JVMs are so similar with respect to performance, you should only compare them in terms of the features that you want. Personally, I think that MS was wise to go for more features at the expense of some performance since that’s really the whole point of a VM. But, unfortunately for them (and fans of CLR/VES/C#/VB/F#) they (historically) could not compete on features that quite a few people really care about (e.g. not perceived to be controlled by a single company, runs well on Linux, marketable in the Valley, etc.)
Sockets aren't bad for serialization between threads in Tcl. Generally, a socket opened against localhost in Tcl is pretty smooth running. I have used multicast UDP sockets in anger with Tcl and it ran well.

For stuff that has to be fast, I generally reach for 'C', so I have not plumbed the depths of performance with sockets in Tcl.

Again, though, I drank the "everything is event driven" Kool-Aid years ago and it works for me.
You can't "just hold the door closed" on a space ship. "Issues" may include "combustion upon reentry," which has very little commercial appeal.
(linux) webdev here, so I write in a couple of different languages.
I believe vscode sits nicely between emacs and eclipse.

emacs on the console at the servers is unbeatable. the daemon just sits there, and I can fiddle with bash, config files, php, css with ease.

As a full IDE, eclipse is still the best for PHP development. Has a myriad of plugins that make it so powerful: pdt, phpunit, code/lib/docs integration, per project configuration, etc. its amazing!

Now, for js and scss, its a bit more complicated. and this is where vscode is shining for me. I had to learn a few command bindings and a few things are weird for me still: ctrl+x yanks the line, on linux middle click isn't default, "folders"...

One of the things I like the most tho, it is written in a language I can understand. Aptana used to be a favourite of mine, but because I couldn't write any code for it, I was limited to bug reporting and waiting. This being in typescript, I feel I can look into the source code and write a PR.

I yet to explore it deeply, but i'm sure it will just get better and better.

have a nice day!
I realize that, but I'm suggesting that you may have misunderstood the author.

It sounds like you think the author is asserting that the null test article was intended as an experimental control and that its production of thrust is evidence for the null hypothesis.

I read him/her as asserting that the null test article is an experimental apparatus calibration tool, and that the reading of thrust suggests the apparatus is improperly calibrated, so that no results at all can be inferred from the experiment.
So I guess you're against trying to find a cure for cancer.

BTW, it's pretty funny that you call systematic bias a "label", yet bad luck is something that seems sufficiently explanatory to you. It seems to me that "bad luck" is a label that you apply to something that you don't wish to study because you just don't care. It's bad luck that humans can't fly. It's bad luck that people die of the flu. As pretty much everything humans do is try to eradicate things that could be labelled as bad luck, actually using that term is essentially yelling "I don't care about this! I like things as they are!"
Oh, so that's how it's done? I always thought there was a formatting rule I was missing. Thanks.
Pepakura File Format Reversing
Yes you're more than welcome to use "mature" tools that haven't changed in a while.

But if you spend a lot of time in the Frontend then it becomes fairly obvious about switching to new tools and frameworks. Builds tools are starting with better defaults, react is making it much easier to build intricate UIs without complexity.
The several daemons serve two purposes:

1. We have to host the signatures somewhere, so we host them in a store we call the notary server.

2. Notary has a concept of timestamping, so we spin up a timestamping server alongside a notary server that can guarantee the freshness of the data. We use a separate server so that folks can segment the timestamp signing functionality from the signature metadata serving functionality. This helps allow separation of concerns.

Timestamping is important because it can help prevent replay attacks where old, validly signed data is served to clients. Think serving an outdated container with known-vulnerable software. Sadly, most artifact signing systems do not mitigate this attack today, but we wanted to make sure ours would.
This has been a pet project of mine for a while. I ripped apart the editor to figure out how it writes files, and that gave me the entire structure. Since then, I've figured out some core pieces of what the data means, but this needs a lot of love still.

If anyone wants to help break things, please join in!
Why would you guess when someone told you they calculated? For marroed filing jointly earning $450k, the marginal rate is 35% federal plus 2.35% Medicare tax plus 9.3% CA tax.

5% higher for $500k
Oh, I understand completely. But just wait 'til you have to face a borked FAT32 file system in a customer system. It's unpleasant.
>>The question you should be asking is how we can accept that so many people are unable to save themselves because of actions we (developed world) have taken. Both recently and in the past.

The developed world (mainly western) has inflicted some atrocities on the other parts but that is not what you trying to picture here. There were countless examples of even the tauted-to-be-benevolent tribal people (e.g. African) attacking and trying to wipe out other tribes throughout the world history.

Alas, currently it has become fashionable to put the entire blame on developed western world. This is propaganda (the one that Marxists and communists also love to spread).

I am not a westerner but I do acknowledge many great deeds done by the westerners in the other parts of the world. Internet, electricity, railways, trucks, roads, aeroplanes, mobile-phones, project Gutenberg, concrete, internet archive, Wikipedia, better agriculture practices, agro machines: take your pick. Also add to that the recent initiatives like MIT OCW.

These things which the western world has given to the entire world there is no parallel such benevolent behaviour in the human history. I am grateful to the developed world for such acts of courage and rising above one's own good and one's own religious sentiments.

I am an Asian, and I do know how mean and malevolent our own people had been and have been even now. Countless massacres and oppressive practices by the Islamists and communists and other tribes and groups.

Personally for me, the projects like Internet, internet archive, Wikipedia and OCW have been so beneficial that I cannot imagine myself educating me without them at such a low cost.

BTW, evolution is a complex phenomena but social structures are also important in overall progress of the society. The western developed societal structure is the best societal structure as of yet.

W.r.t. this it is no wonder, for many people here (including me), the western world seems like heaven.
I'd very much like to use a debugger with my Go code but the two initiatives I've seen both require installing delve locally and it's a big pain in the ass. The official instructions for OSX begin with "Make a self signed certificate", which they then break down into 14 separate steps.

I wonder how hard it would be to make a delve server and install it on a Docker instance that could talk back to Atom/Sublime/VSCode.
Chinese "Future Mobility Corp" is still a wild shot in the air

Not really, Tencent is extremely famous, it's like Google here. You may not be aware that literally most vehicles on the road here in China are electric already (though most are bikes, there are also buses, taxis and tractors).
I am an American, and love my country and plan on living here my whole life. I want my country to be successful, and I buy into a lot of the values that are quintessentially 'American'.

However, I still find it strange to think someone who happens to be born inside the borders of America somehow deserves a job more than someone born outside the borders.

It always seems quite arbitrary - I mean, I am also a Californian, but I don't get upset if someone hires a Floridian instead of a Californian. I live in Los Angeles, but I don't get upset if someone hires a person from San Diego.
>Now Intel can play on both sides with their low power x86 parts, Xeon-D with upto 16 cores and Core-M in 2c/4t configuration.

There's only one little problem: the market has settled on ARM and doesn't care anymore.

So how are they gonna play those "both sides" again?
Socialists and Libertarians – The Great Divide
> [Animal a] could do [task]. [Animal b] could do [task].

Ok, but it doesn't follow that they are similarly intelligent. You may have just picked a too easy task to distinguish.
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-35639549
Every voter gets to decide if they find that okay. Your opinion isn't really operative.
We stood up containers, on very large scale, in a PaaS, with a very small team, in 2012 (long before systemd, or Docker for that matter, became a major force).

This was made possible by the work done by Serge Hallyn, Stephane Graber, and others at Canonical. They delivered LXC and its integration with AppArmor, which in turn stood on top of the cgroups/namespaces work that Google contributed to the kernel. Ubuntu 12.04 was the release where the ability to securely run containers at scale became available to mere mortals.
The canned coffee boom
That's where things like the PRU on the TI chips (Beaglebone being one of them) gets interesting:

http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/PRU-ICSS
USA checking in. No open bottle of wine in my house ever makes it to the next calendar day. Sounds like I might enjoy Argentina.
More to the point, peer review picks an limited sample of papers to accept, based on interestingness and X printed pages per month per journal. There is no peer review system that will review and accept every valid research project.
A little "politically incorrect" related video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dm_Vv3Q24uQ
ARM chips have feature parity with Atom chips except for their x86 architecture and power. ARM chips and their implementations are less complex, not more. Software components can be a bother, but ARM runs Linux perfectly well. If Linux doesn't suit your fancy, there are plenty of RTOS waiting for you.

And I kind of touched on the simplicity of software development. Yes, it's possible to quickly shove in a really tiny x86 computer and be done with it, but it ends up being cost prohibitive and energy hungry. Embedded environments are a place where you can get by with a tiny ARM chip; they're power efficient and cost effective. If you're in the embedded field, dev isn't as simple as a REPL, you have to put it directly on your device or otherwise emulate your device in some way. This forces you to come up with robust solutions.

Dev in this environment is already hard. It has to be robust anyway. Maybe we should pick the right tool for the job while we're at it.

And I am happy using a robust solution that I know won't fail me. If you're in a situation where failing to write bug-free code can kill, you would be too. Medical devices are one such field.

(But to each his own, of course! You can do awesome things with any tool.)
So, just like Apple, with the same "high margin" strategy, their 19th year of record revenues and $600 billion in store?

And how exactly would them (Intel in this case) selling commoditized, low margin, products make it better for them?

Isn't it even worse, even quicker, for low margin players when their stuff doesn't sell?
Is that pricing just for the ESP8266 IC rather than a board with an ESP8266 mounted and ready to be used?
Same here. My initial reaction was incredulity that they didn't write the one line of code it would take to convert to a supported format...
There is no peer reviewed evidence in favor of peer review?
Engineering, from my recollections, had probably the highest wash-out rates of any major when I was in college. It sure looks like a huge part of that is because of the math requirements - a lot of engineering programs throw you in the deep end right at the beginning, with calculus and differential equations, and then you're pretty much hosed in the subsequent coursework if that doesn't click, or you come in woefully unprepared. And overwhelmingly, high schools do a piss-poor job of teaching mathematics to a level that would prepare someone to hit the ground running well enough to survive the initial stages of an engineering major and get through to the interesting stuff. AP Calculus students from top high schools struggle mightily with it, Flying Spaghetti Monster help you if you never mastered, or even were exposed to those concepts at weaker schools.

Computer science isn't much different. All the math coursework hazing is why I have a history degree and a minor in CS - the minor let you take all the interesting stuff, without the 4-5 semesters of poorly taught, mostly useless math department coursework.
I see nothing wrong with this. I think it's good to be specific. The Linux implementation is different from many other containerization solutions (eg, Solaris Zones, AIX WPAR, HPUX partitions, etc, so forth). The scope of "all container solutions for every platform" is too broad to be able to provide much depth, and the audience of people interested in container information for all platforms instead of a specific platform is fairly narrow.

There's plenty of room for someone to make a document specific to other platforms for a different audience. There's even room for someone to make a comparison of all platforms. It depends on your goal, your knowledge, and your intended audience.
I'm all for free but if you're doing actual engineering drawings have you checked out AutoCAD LT? Much cheaper than full blown AutoCAD.
Do they give you a loaner?
> You are either willfully ignorant or just a real dope.

It's possible to disagree without being disagreeable. Why the personal insults?
That statement is absurd on its face, the system is designed to be subjective, not objective.
My mother and aunt both have fond memories of doing this - apparently the mist was really cool and refreshing. Also they're both breast cancer survivors.
Neglects to note libertarian socialism: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
Mongolia.
Well even the Economist, which I consider to be the finest newspaper around (they call themselves a newspaper) and the closest thing to being unbiased, still has a subtle underlying predisposition likely at least somewhat influenced by its owners.
This is why I don't understand people who are ready to rush headlong into autonomous vehicle world. I especially don't get it with tech people, and more especially with software people.

We know what can go wrong. I've heard the arguments that "yeah, but software is less fallible than humans". Maybe, but what happens when a situation arises that requires human judgment beyond what mere sensors can provide?

And, what happens when an OTA update regresses some safety feature or conflicts with another?
Culture does not have a view, as abstract concepts cannot themselves conceptualize
You understand! Lets apply for IMO grant for that.
Well, it's not just a friend, it's something he supports.

There's something to be said for Bayesian updating, and in this case I'm willing to say that people who have the right of it scientifically are less likely to support telepathy.
> I expected them to build the Everywhere interface for opvault

I realize this may only partially help you, but onepasswordpy (https://github.com/Roguelazer/onepasswordpy) has support for both Agilekeychain and the OpVault, if you find yourself on a system that isn't Mac or Windows, or otherwise is a PitA to get to your keychain/vault.

In fairness(?) to Agilebits, the 1Password Anywhere really was just the most bare-bones possible, as it didn't support any of the encrypted items except Login; so no Passwords, Secure Notes, no attachments on anything. Maybe they just figured it wasn't worth the hassle to flesh it out, and then with opvault it became a lower priority than it was before.
When I got my last computer, I just copied my home directory over. Funnily enough, my old login sessions worked.
I'm curious as to whether or not this is objectively true when measured. It doesn't have to be intentional, but a reputation for that (which it certainly had at one point) could have the equivalent effect.
Regardless of this being chainanchor's goal, do you think this approach would work?
Societies and cultures are just the emergent results of the interaction of phenotypes. i.e. Culture and people are one and the same.
> I guess that lingering smell of urine keeps people coming back to SF?

I like the weather.
I work for an SV startup that has a satellite office in Seattle. We're in Seattle for the engineering talent. I think Seattle's role in the startup world has a good foundation because it's about talent. As for NYC I can tell you what the founders say around the office. That is that the foundational tech doesn't come from the East Coast. The business culture is aggressive and well financed but not as innovative in tech as SV. This has lots of downstream effects. Incorporating leading edge tooling is faster in SV for example. Learning from failure is a norm not an embarrassment in SV. Fundraising means driving to SF and Menlo Park, not flying. It's easier, more networked. Etc. At this point SV's advantages compound each other. What will happen is that SV will spread to Oakland and Berkeley, the next frontiers.
Scientists Unveil the 'Most Clever' CRISPR Gadget So Far
I upvoted you because you're right, but maybe you and I should take a few months off and time some of the better ones! Worthless machines but I've heard of some lasting a great deal of time.
Prohibit cars. 1/6 of Holocaust every year will be prevented.
Harden this container!

http://regex.info/i/pic/2005-09-06_16:03.28__00002.jpg

Ideas: Cross-linked polymer? Switch to glass? Too heavy. Carbon fiber, epoxy resin composite?
Complexity refers to overall cognitive load, hassle and lead time for developers and the business as a whole (hardware sourcing, cross-compiling, testing, etc.) and not just chip features.

Hard limits to processing power, memory, energy availability, etc. do exist in some applications, but the OP doesn't seem to have these issues.
Prohibit cars. Millions of lives are more important than car industry.
Defamation law suits are important for curtailing shock-jock journalism, without them journalists are ultimately free to lie about someone and report it as fact.
To say that it is a "bit slower" than an Aventador is very misleading. In a 0-60 straight line drag race, maybe. But that's not particularly hard to do (that's why Mustangs are cheap), and also not the point of any serious supercar.
Exactly, in order to have a long career in science, one needs to toe the line, and keep in the mainstream.
Same, but from Seattle. Maybe it's just those of us who are broken, but I'm immensely happier when it's sunny. I'll grant you, I find reasons to be grumpy sometimes when it's nice out (too damn hot, no AC in the house, whatever), but overall I'm vastly happier. Anyone who knows me would say the same. The thrill of a really nice day is gone, but on balance my situation is improved. Not only that, but after a decade or so, I've come to even appreciate the rare grey or rainy day for what it reminds me of, rather than kicking off a cycle of despair.
It's not that the paper is wrong for only focusing on Linux "containers".

It's that the paper, while describing the security short comings of the various solutions, illustrates the echo chamber I refer to.

"We have these security issues, that others do not have, but we are not going to look at how they solved these issues because, well, Linux!"

The paper, IMO, would have better served the audience had it included ideas and/or solutions people outside Linux-land developed to solve some of these issues that were written before Linux even attempted a "container".

You are free to disagree.
You know, mathematically speaking, each of us had about 20 million ancestors, if we go back in time. All of them dead now. So what?
Ten Most Interesting Facts About Honey-Bees
How does something like Graal handle memory when emulating C? I imagine using JVM 1.9 will help?
Mongolia is beautiful too. No dengue, no malaria.
Same thing happened with Model S when first released. Mine had window that wouldn't rollup, door that spontaneously opened, noise from engines and noise from sun roof. All fixed, but annoying. Thank goodness cars have longer warranty than other tech and tesla stands by car.
Virtual Reality Reminds Users What It's Like to Be Themselves