skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
I actually posted this link because I found pagination by relnext underused while implementing fast forward (with space support) in the Vivaldi browser.

If it's not present we start, like opera did, analyzing links, which is a little messy.
I'd say that maximizing is more general then having a custom sized window. There are only so many resolutions in use (and I would guess 50%+ is either hd, full hd or qhd). Resizing your windows yield nearly unlimited options for browser sizes.
Why upload them anywhere? Take the photos and store them on your computer/phone/backup drive. I mean if the goal is to have some nice photos you can look back on but remove the element of crazing likes etc. why even bother uploading them to your own website?
> It would be in most travellers top ten things to do before you die list.

Something that has been bothering me lately. I have no memory of 99% of my life. No I don't have medical condition, I've spoken to lots of people about this, my friends who I've spoken to have forgotten their babies first steps, their baby's first words, first date with their spouse ect which most people would rate as top moments of their lives.

I am not even sure that the stuff I do remember form my life is actually accurate or if I've stored them in an edited/modified form that would please me. I am not even sure if 'me according to me' is a honest representation or if its just bunch of inaccuracies that I've woven into somewhat consistent story about myself.

People used to view material goods as good life now it all about 'experiences' . I just don't understand that constant demand by both society and internally to have experiences at all costs. We think that without experiences our minds will become dull and uninteresting, experiences would wake us up from our dull lives.
It's not necessarily about reading articles. It's about giving everyone the freedom and opportunity to do so if they wish. You might not want to read them now, but what if you became interested in physics, or a friend of family member became ill? You'd want to know more about these things from the research literature, and the current system denies the vast majority of people that opportunity. You don't even know if articles are any good or useful until you've paid. We recently published a paper that attempts to convey different needs for open access to research here: http://f1000research.com/articles/5-632/v1
Good catch - sloppy proofreading by me. Thanks!
Why is this a top thread on HN? We are all aware of the fraud in photos. Next...
> Social media is, for the most parts, a tool to elevate your perceived social status.

That premise is what's hipster about these quotes.
The screenshots don't show the "Details" tab. Maybe the process can be seen there?
PyDev of the Month: Peter Damoc
Then don't stand there. The world is a big place, if you find yourself surrounded by 100 lit up screens and you would rather not, take a few steps to the side.
they did this with the birds in the wilderness downtown experiment like 5 years ago right? http://www.thewildernessdowntown.com/
Mass death from disease clearly happened. I think there is some room to question how much of it was intentional. Clearly some of it was intentional, but if diseases unthinkingly carried over on the first voyages are responsible for a large number of the deaths, we should take note of that.
I'm merely suggesting that people should diversify their media intake to (try to) eliminate bias. Most newspapers do have a political agenda. In Sweden newspapers often state their political affiliation, which I think is great. Looking at the Guardian's wiki page under "political alignment", they are considered centre-left. [1]

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Guardian
Wedding Video Invitations – Best Way to Impress Guests
There was some discussion on this post: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10317062

I liked some of those buildings, but I'm not sure why. Probably just the loneliness feeling.
Here's a meme: http://i.imgur.com/4WgaE5S.jpg
Sounds like you have a problem with selfie sticks (as do I!), and not picture taking. I take a lot of pictures on vacation. Between my iphone and my dslr I might have 1-2k pictures taken over 2 weeks. Many of them are the same picture with different settings as I 'play' around. I always pay attention to what is happening around me and am considerate of others.
But "we" don't have a problem because we don't do it. And "they" don't have a problem either, because they choose to do it (unless the behaviour is compulsive in some way).

That's not how I would spend a vacation myself, but it's their vacation and their time. If they enjoy the attention, what's wrong with them enjoying it?
This is one of those awesomely pointless conceptual experiments. Love it.
Show HN: Recycle bin for rm -rf [Asciicast]
I think your point is valid and the way you phrased it amusing. I would never downvote it.

That said, the position is not wholly different from "laws are the leading cause of crime" or "the ebola outbreak did not cause people to panic - it was their desire to live and be healthy".
What happened when ‘Fake Steve Jobs’ went to work for a real software company
Copy Files Between Cloud Storage Providers
Weird argument. If 1% of America is reading this research, then it is most likely because the research is locked behind paywalls where only those going to Universities can get access to the material.

Of course, this whole argument implies that all the research produced is only being viewed by 1% of the population then much of it is worthless and never used, therefore the public funds put into using the research were largely wasted - which we know is definitely not true. And if only 1% of the population is viewing the material, then it seems a bit unlikely that it would be so highly profitable for people like Elsevier.

I mean, this argument breaks down even further because if even only 1% more people were to use the research because it was free, the benefit to society would be worth many orders of magnitude more than the funds that would have been gained from selling the material.

The final, fatal flaw in the argument, however is that the money paid into National Parks is given to the Government, who use it to pay for the upkeep of National Parks. The people who are charging to access research are doing so to make a profit and relying largely on research funded not by the publishers, but by the U.S. Government who give grants! They are hardly contributing their entire profits into research.
And I do the same thing. It's the "looking for social approval" that's the issue here.
Spelling before coffee has curious outputs. Proofreading before coffee has no outputs.
What difference does it make? Two people shared a beer, that's all.
Full-time .NET developer (doing all sorts of freelance jobs; ASP.NET, Xamarin, etc.). I think you'll find that if you look outside the silicon valley bubble, C# and Java are actually dominating the market and you won't get very far trying to find a Haskell/Rust/Go job.
You missed the point. Try applying those effects in realtime, on an iPhone 4s, to a live video stream coming directly from the camera. It's quite difficult, even with everything that CoreImage provides. GPUImage? It's cake.
I think the article is oversimplifying the issue. This isn't about access, who reads it, or who pays for the research, it's about greed. Plain and simple. Corporations are making money off of the restricting of access to scientific research, and they are fighting to preserve that business model.
Passive might be a better term.
Coming soon: Live longer if you work at Google.

Everybody else, tough luck.
Of course it is cheaper if you live in a hub. NYC, ATL, CLT, all have cheap flights. My guess is that most people do not live within easy driving distance of those places and have to pay the local airport premium.
I would find it very creepy to say please and thank you to a machine.

Do you thank your car when you press lock on the remote and it works? Do you thank the light switch?

Just because it talks doesn't make Amazon echo any different.

Please don't teach your kids to do that!
> Intel's syntax is most common, not the AT&T one.

No, intel is an exception, not the norm. Amstrad, Atari, Commodore 64, Amiga, Sun (both Motorola and (Ultra)SPARC) all use "move src, dst", $ or 0x... only intel diverges from the norm.
Fossil fuels could be phased out worldwide in a decade, says new study
I've been thinking somewhere along the same lines, but eliminating bias is incredibly hard to do, even with machine learning. Hopefully we'll see some experimentation in this area here on HN.
...as is the Church of Scientology, but it is still considered a 'religion' in much of the world.

Religion is about control. Religion is about conformity and forcing people into a narrow view of faith in a specific thing (see the multiple branches of christianity, judaism or islam).

Faith is neither about control, nor conformity. You can have faith in anything, including a corporation, or a physical object or an idea.
I really like this idea. But I find it somewhat annoying that the "new" tab also sort by popularity. Shouldn't it only sort by posting date?
Gentlest Introduction to Tensorflow
You can look into http://userjoy.co.
You can find the details at https://github.com/savinay/userjoy
Updating Beliefs
Nice to see this resubmitted after I submitted it a few days ago but it got no traction. One of the authors is a friend of mine - it's an intriguing piece of work.
I recall seeing a documentary about the start of Silicon Valley, where a lot of the early money came from Rockefeller and other "east coast" money. Does that mean that the current tech industry owes a debt to Standard Oil? Probably. Is it relevant? Probably not.
The parent has a great point about credentials and ssh-agent in general. Netrc isn't a great pattern.

But for git you have the right answer.

I completely forgot this aspect because on OS X you can delegate git auth to Keychain with a helper.

https://help.github.com/articles/caching-your-github-passwor...
Just on the off-chance you haven't already seen it, the install trigger for the command-line toolchain is:

sudo xcode-select --install
I guess they never heard of the Streissand effect, huh?
If true, this has to be the most asinine idea in government ever. If the government produces a report that says a department, program, or policy is ineffective, what better source of research to provide to policymakers?! Using government research against the government is gold!

Source: I'm a lobbyist. GAO, CRS, and CBO reports are absolutely gold mines when it comes to discussing the issues with harmful policies.
Funny you used such an example, because it's a rather short sighted perspective. Sure, feel all warm and fuzzy about it, but reality is that what you are partaking in is really the deconstruction of human diversity and uniqueness and smoothing out of humanity into a grey matter of mediocrity and uniformity.

Sure, maybe you won't experience the outcomes in your lifetime, but do you think your child or grandchild will also be able to go to that same place and have a similar experience? No, they won't, because the relentless drive of the internet will not stop trying to consolidate and creating uniformity.

WE are really starting to see its horrific effects on humanity in Europe, where a self-loathing population that wails for diversity is self-destructing by deconstructing the very thing that makes them unique and actually contributes to diversity and uniqueness. The problem is that everyone is so mired down in the myopic small scale, that they can't see the permanent and irreversible destruction and devastation and repercussions their actions cause on a bigger scale.

But so is humanity, furiously paving the path to hell in narrow minded, short sighted, selfish, bleeding heart on their sleeve soaked pavers.
I went to the page and saw nothing and heard random crash-y sounds for minutes, the whole time I thought it was poking at Windows 95 for crashing all the time. I thought that was hilarious
No C# here but lots of Java (Backend, Android).
(Cologne, Germany)
> the whole internet is ruining and poisoning and deconstructing whole segments of human interaction and activity and relationship.

Let me correct it for you: The whole internet is CHANGING whole segments of human interaction and [...]

The one constant of life is change. Change doesn't care if it's good or bad, it just is. If you zoom out to a much large scale spices mutate and go extinct. It just how it is.

Lets take it back to people. When writing came out, people lamented that it was ruining oral traditions. When the printing press came out, people complained that it was running writing. When cheap paper backs came out, people complained that everybody could all of a sudden publish and this it would lower the quality of books. Then my teacher complained that handwriting was becoming lost worse because of using keyboards.

All of a sudden if connect everybody in the world to every other person in the world it will have an impact. It will change and alter human interaction.

Now you're free to lament & you are free to not participate, but it doesn't mean that other people don't derive immense value out of internet / instagram / online communications.

I don't even like instagram, but you know whatevs.
It is and was called imperialism and almost every nation and civilization has done it (not that it excuses it).

Even optimistic Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek future it continues on and is a topic (the prime directive).

What do you think happened to the neanderthals?

Survival instincts are just inherently nasty but we as humans should rise above these tendencies since we have the cognitive ability to do so.

I mean for god sake look how we treat and what we do to the animals that we eat. A hundred years from now it might be seen as a serious moral slip on our part. We might all be very bad people.
radar is based primarily on time delays, secondarily on doppler shift, the signal intensity is not such a major factor since it varies a lot depending on the incidence angle of the target.
Or, as I heard earlier today...

Trying to dupe the Internet: 175k

Watching it backfire: priceless.

:)
> Someone should find those Europeans and punish them.

In the case of "Lord Jeff" he instead has a prestigious small college as well as a largish university named after him.
I wrote this to supplement the original presentation slides (http://www.slideshare.net/KhorSoonHin/gentlest-introduction-...) and video (https://youtu.be/dYhrCUFN0eM) at a Tensorflow meetup because the slides and video got more love than I ever expected. Enjoy and let me know what I didn't do well.
Ask HN: After working for myself what job positions am I suitable for?
I'm 30 years old and have been working for myself for about 6 years now, developing my own ideas into successful mobile applications (over 3 million paid downloads). I'm now looking to move on from this as I'm a little burnt out and I would like to work with more people again. The issue I currently have is wondering what positions I should apply for.

Although I studied in computer science and assumed I would be a programmer, I find that for me, programming is a means to an end, the end being getting an idea into something real. For my current apps I take them through the full lifecycle myself, from idea, to feature requirements, UI design, programming, marketing, release and then the direction of where they should go in future updates. So I have quite a broad set of skills and experiences, yet besides under my own business my only other work has been in web development.

While looking at job positions I'm questioning if employers will see that I have anything besides programming to offer and if I would be capable of working in a more product development/management oriented role.
You only need a couple though. Like the old days, do some stuff, snap a couple photos along the way, usually only one person in the group even had a camera.
"Share a beer" is, as I've always used it, a shorthand expression for "shared time, conversation, and company with someone, while drinking beers".

It's just a simple expression that takes the place of a bunch of concurrent activities.
Funny thing is that it's actually a tool to validate one's life to the corporation that owns and possesses that data. You validated nothing by being a corporate drone other than that you are a corporate drone that was milked all our life.
It has nothing to do with the operating system. AT & T syntax follows the same style as pretty much any other computer and processor in existence. (Exceptions exist, but they are exotic oddities.)
Memory Access Patterns Are Important (2012)
The pictures by the pros won't have my daughter in them.
The idea appears to be that gov't funds cannot be used to lobby for political or policy changes, so that, for example, funds given to Greenpeace would have to be spent on non-political activities. But the rule is so broadly written that it basically poisons any gov't-funded research; rather than simply regulating the use of funds, it would prevent a researcher from speaking out in favor or against policies based on their research. This probably isn't by design. Probably.
you mean those folks who went away from europe/were kicked out for various reasons, and came to america and afterwards did those things? i agree with your outrage since it shows pure evil, but logically most descendants of those people should be US citizens for many generations.
The biggest boon to my traveling was a) go to cheaper places b) AirBnb c) off season or shoulders. Croatia is amazing and inexpensive, although I would make sure to go in the summer to experience the beaches. Hungary is the same and is nice in the fall/spring. Slovenia is a beautiful country. Even Prague can be affordable on the 'shoulders'. Flights are still pricey, but even they are cheaper if you avoid the 3 months of the summer.

I have even touched on SEA which appears to be the younger persons favorite inexpensive place to go.
There is a moral theory that slavery is bad, but not because of what it does to the slaves. Slavery is bad because of what it does to the slaveholders. It duhumanizes our relationship with the outside world.

I'm just tossing that out there. It's something I need to think much more about. But this might be an idea that gains a lot more traction over the next few decades as AI takes off.
This is how those people go through daily life. For them, vacation is about relating to other people--the people they are with and their friends and family elsewhere. They want to share everything they are involved in, and in part they want to make themselves look good. So they take photos and they immediately share them.

This may not seem relaxing to you, but I don't see how it's a problem. It's how they want to spend their vacation--and even if it is not relaxing, it's what they want to do. What's the problem?

A complaint seems to be "people are spending too much time photographing and not enough time experiencing the place." Photographing and sharing is precisely how many people experience the place, along with sharing those photographs and by seeing the photographs of others. Those people are sociable and like to share. That's not bad.

Personally I am not like that. If one wants a quiet vacation experience without big crowds, it is easy to get. For instance I often hear Yellowstone is crowded. While there I never understood this perception--it seemed expansive and quiet to me as we plied the roads and hiked down the trails. Then we saw Old Faithful. It was like going to the shopping mall. Same goes for this guy seeing this place in Cambodia. I'd bet anything that if he just strayed a couple thousand feet from whatever vista this was, he would have experienced "the real place," whatever he wanted that to be.

These sociable folks who want to share photos are like that every day. They're not going to change because they're on vacation, nor should they. Similarly the people who just want to experience wherever they are without sharing it with everyone are going to be like that everyday. They don't change while on vacation either. There's nothing wrong with the folks who want to share and pieces like this one are nothing but a bunch of snobbery. If the writer wants to spend his/her vacation being a snob, well, ok. The folks taking the photos and sharing them are probably enjoying their vacations. Hopefully he is enjoying his by being a snob.
Indeed. I saw an adult man shouting profanities at Siri in the street not long ago - I don't think he needed amazon echo to be an asshole.

A rather more intriguing question arises from this however, which is the rights of non-human sentient or ersatz-sentient beings. When we have true AI, they will probably be the most used and abused "souls" on earth. While I'm not directly proposing that people empathise with computers (although they are fine empathising with glass and nylon when they're fashioned into a teddy shape), we should consider the consequences of torturing a potentially powerful being.

Perhaps the solution is anthropomorphicism - if it can think or act like it thinks, you have to give it a face, or something.
PPC and Motorola 680## series, as well as (Ultra)SPARC all use src, dst.
Several years back I decided to stop taking photos. I felt I spent too much time looking at the world through my camera screen or viewfinder instead of with my own eyes, and worrying about the right settings instead of simply enjoying myself and letting go. (I'm not an experienced photographer, which probably also makes me slower.)

Turns out it wasn't the best solution either. Memory decays, and a few years later it became difficult to reminisce anything about the places I went to.

The sweet spot for me is to just snap a few pictures, quickly, without worrying about how good it looks. I don't post anything on social media anyway, so I couldn't care less how cool my photo looks. But years later, these photos are invaluable as catalysts to trigger my brain into reminiscing much much more about these moments than if I didn't have any photos.
we're having a baby girl soon. should I name her Alexa? everyone in our house is aready used to screaming that name.
Well, mobile browsers are generally very restricted in many ways. Nobody would realistically use a mobile device (in their current incarnations at least) for debugging or any sort of development, despite what many people try to convince us of (the decline of regular computing environment and the sole ascend of those touch thingies :) )
It's poorly elucidated in the article:

"The aim of the Cabinet Office edict was to stop NGOs from lobbying politicians and Whitehall departments using the government’s own funds. "

The idea is to stop organisations, specifically charities, from using their government grants to lobby on political issues (i.e grants should fund only the charitable activities of the organisation).

Unfortunately it seems the law may not be specific enough in it's focus.