skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
> The SEC doesn't mind if you cancel a planned stock sale as an insider

Actually, they do tend to mind, and they will scrutinize you much more intensely if you engage in insider not-trading... it's just there's not much they can do about the non-sale in and of itself.
Sounds a bit like some shitty genetic defect.
Perl 6 does offer COMEFROM, they're just called CATCH blocks.
Just saw this too!

https://www.youtube.com/snoopavision?v=foXTsDKvRgc
What is a flat-file CMS?
With the same argument, agriculture is important for advanced economies, because no other sector can generate as many jobs. Remember, not too long ago a large majority of the people were farmers.

Eventually we'll have to move away from the notion that everybody needs a job that contributes to GDP.
They are currently building the biggest factory in the world to make the batteries. It's no secret. That pretty much answers your question.
I think the "semi" was for "IDE", to compare it to Visual Studio.
Some of this looks great. I'm suffering through making some internal tools an old version of php after deprecating some older perl 5 cgi scripts on an even older CentOS box, and reaaally not enjoying it.

I understand the value of coding in other texts, but I still get a little squicked out seeing the characters for pi, and union, etc in code. I know they have ascii equivalents, but its not saving a keystroke, exactly. Though, it does remind me of some joker Swift posts where the identifiers were all emoji's. I'd keep interns away from it for now.

The built-in grammar parser looks great! C-lib integration looks promising. Multi-methods look nice. Operator overloads look ... safe-ish-er than C++. Simpler profiling.
Perl5 module + other language in-lining looks great and terrible. "Whatever" wildcards don't quite seem like full pattern-matching, but better than $_ or endless shift loops.

Overall, seems pretty good!
If I can just drop it in for my "perl -lne 'm|($regex)|g&&print$1'" command-line use I might swap it out sooner than later.
API surface is often misleading, too. A JSON library that basically just provides a "json_encode" and a "json_decode" could be perfectly cromulent, whereas "trimlib", providing "right_trim" and "left_trim"...
Finally there's a Snapchat for groups
> Eventually we'll have to move away from the notion that everybody needs a job that contributes to GDP.

The goal is not maximum employment, The goal is maximum production. Whether that involves more employees is a totally different topic.
different strokes for different folks.

Can't stand the front. Looks more like a Toyota than like a "premium car". But I don't like the Porsche Panamera too. I don't think we have the same taste in cars.
As a high performance driving enthusiast, I am very receptive to electric cars. I've hammered on the Roadster and Model S pretty hard on close courses, and instruct others. I put money down on a Model 3 today.

That said, "15 minutes to refuel" an ICE is way overstated; it's more like 5 tops, including a piss break and cleaning the windshield. I don't disagree that the supercharger setup is great (I have a friend who does deployments), and it would come in handy for my regular bay area<->san diego roadtrips. That said, Tejon Ranch to San Diego is kind of pushing it on a slightly lower range S, and 2x 30min stops is non-trival for most people. I just finished a 4000mi southwest roadtrip (incidentally, a piss break in BFE Utah had me at an unexpected supercharger station), and we're a ways from where I'm comfortable doing such a trip on electricity. But that's fine -- that's my hangup, not a technical problem, and not something that can't be solved relatively soon. If electric adoption continues to ramp up as quickly as it has, finding a station won't be an issue, it'll just be a minor inconvenience to spend 25 mins more charging up -- which, again, is probably a worthwhile tradeoff for lower operating costs, and considering that 98% of customer miles involve regular end-of-day recharges.

Incidentally, my quickest roadtrip was down the west coast at an average speed of 75mph; 900 miles in about 11h with only a single fuel stop. By stopping in Oregon, where the clerk fills your car for you, I was able to receive a full tank of fuel, a piss break, and a gas station hotdog and soda in approximately 2 minutes' time. YMMV :)
Did DeepSpark actually write this blog post?
Video on youtube(high quality):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q4VGQPk2Dl8
What about voter rights? Why is nobody fighting the Fiasco in AZ?
the statement " no other sector can generate nearly as many well-paying jobs" would mean more if they showed loss of jobs due to automation and projected how future automation would effect the ability of manufacturing to produce so many well-paying jobs.

Because maybe the argument is Advanced Economies must still make things for the next 15 years after which it's not really worthwhile.
> I haven't thought about the implications of committing external packages to your own source control at all. I'm guessing I'm missing something.

Committing external dependencies to source control means tons of bloat to the repos themselves. Want to clone huge_framework just to change a tiny thing? Well too bad, you'll need to clone the hundred megabytes of external dependencies too. Multiple libraries/frameworks/modules containing same versions of same modules? Too bad, everyone needs to commit their dependencies. Frameworks shouldn't commit their dependencies then? Or just libraries? Or just modules? Where is the line and what are the rules?

Why not just handle dependencies manually? Because that's a pain in the ass and exact reason why package managers exist in first place.
I was laid off from my job as a Python programmer in San Francisco on 07AUG2015. It took me 4 1/2 months to find another job working remotely as a Python programmer.

I did not keep an accurate record of the number of resumes that I sent out, but I archived 110 cover letters during that time. I would bet that I probably sent out about 150 resumes.

I had scores of phone interviews and a dozen to fifteen in-person interviews a few of which ended abruptly. I will turn 69 years old in October 2016.
Hatchbacks are also hugely popular in Europe. Maybe it will grow on Americans as well - something like the Model 3 could be watershed car that creates a new design fashion.
That's hard to believe. I've never heard chromatic have anything positive to say about Perl 6.
but, but how about intellectual property ?!? I thought patenting the round corners is the future ..
It looks like it's a hatch-back, so wouldn't 1 Series or A3 be more fitting?
You can create a more hardened setup by using a 4096 bit RSA key:

/opt/letsencrypt/letsencrypt-auto certonly --rsa-key-size 4096 --server https://acme-v01.api.letsencrypt.org/directory -a webroot --webroot-path=$DIR -d $DOMAINS

...and using the secp384r1 curve for ECDHE key exchange:

# in your nginx.conf
ssl_ecdh_curve secp384r1;

Arguably, the real state of the art is to use an ECDSA certificate. Let's Encrypt recently started supported them, they offer a equivalent level of security to RSA at much lower bit lengths (a 384 bit ECDSA key is considered equivalent to a 7680 bit RSA key) and a few recent TLS vulnerabilities (like DROWN) have targeted implementation details of RSA.
I don't see why anybody likes dull sedans. They all look like Camrys to me. Even some of the best-looking cars that LOOK like sedans (like the Model S and Mazda6) were liftback/hatchback designs.

I'm on car number 7 now and hope to never own a sedan in my life. Wagon/hatchback for life.
Oracle supported way would be to use Oracle Linux for that.
Did you read Sindre's post? You're still arguing about numbers of characters and lines of code.

Determining whether a value is negative zero in JS is non-trivial and easy to get wrong. JS tries its best to shield you from the existence of negative zero but it still exists and if you do have to test for it, your intuitive solution (x === -0, String(x).charAt(0) === '-', Math.sign(x) === -1, etc) will likely be wrong.

It's not equivalent to "comparing numbers for equality". It's a specific problem with a specific but obscure solution. If you had to work this solution out yourself (if, indeed, as you're more likely to just get it wrong or arrive at something more complex or less efficient) you would put it in a function and you'd have to write a couple of tests for that function to make sure it actually works and doesn't produce false positives.

The same goes for figuring out the user's home directory: most Node developers use a flavour of *nix (usually OSX or Linux) so they may know `process.env.HOME` but what about Windows users? Most likely they will just forego Windows or assume it's also called `HOME` on Windows (because on many developer Windows machines it might be for compatibility). Instead, don't guess and just add a small module that does that one thing and can be extended should this change in the future (e.g. if OS11 comes along and starts calling it `APPLE_HOME` or if Win11 goes full POSIX and also calls it `HOME` but still passes the platform check for Windows).

Your strawman of number equality OTOH is not about a weird edge case or a cross-platform concern but merely about knowing the language. Of course it'd be ridiculous to add a function to compare two numbers for equality in an if statement because the language already provides an operator for that. The only excuse I can see for that would be if you take functional programming to its logical conclusion and want every operator to be a function your religious views prohibit using modules that provide entire collections of these functions so you need to add every operator as its own dependency.

Then again, I have published a module in the past that today can literally be replaced with four characters of code in ES2015 (plus whitespace) -- and the API documentation is even wrong on what it does (but at least it has 100% test coverage). Everything can be taken to its absurd extreme, what point you should bail at depends on the situation.
Thank you for taking time and the effort to response. I appreciate that.
I agree with the notion that you need to be free in choosing what you want to build. I like the notion of why, what, how in http://abbytheia.com/2016/02/07/why-what-how/

So we should be free in what we build but how should be influenced 1) by the what and 2) your team's experience.
The why is key to know what to build. Without knowing why, pondering about what is pointless.

The constant potential for modification in an efficient manner is indeed a key of software development and very difficult to achieve in my experience. Besides concentrating on small things you need to watch and maintain your architecture of the system. Alas there is a point where you need to change the architecture. I think Martin Fowler was it what found out that at a certain point an architecture which was a right fit at the beginning cannot be maintained in a reasonable way and has to be stepped up.
I would be interested what are the combination of practices that work for you is (even if they do not apply to my team).
With pragmatism I refer to the artifact, the what, it needs to be a good fit to the problem and the users. And it is important to thing with what solution can "you get away with". Not in the way it is build but what does it achieve, the capability it provides. I have seen too many developers failing to fulfill requirements in time and budget because they stuck to the wording of the requirement. The requirement was a box for them, a prison.
The problem behind the requirement is the one the developer needs to solve, not the requirement as is which is often wrong or unclear anyway. I have seen so much leverage here that I am putting most of my effort here: teaching to find and eliminate assumptions, getting to the problem, goals and needs of the user and the business, ...

The practices, the how. In my 15 years of professional development I tried many different practices and some are good for some situations, others feel like a waste of time and effort. I am yet on the search for a consistent set that fits me and my team.
How do you consistently apply the practices? Only in projects? Or do you use katas or something like that?

Again thank you for discussing. I believe such honest and clear discussions are needed more than the many arguments about what is better or worse.
Yeah this is really funny. Somewhere in this thread somebody said that he finds the 3s design superior to the Model S and that he really likes the Porsche Panamera. My taste in cars is completely the opposite.

But I don't care too much about asthetics in cars, I value practical considerations much higher.
I assume it's a t-shirt or keychain or something. I was "in line" (1h before store opened, 1h to get to the front) so I guess we'll see.
I must say you are quite delusional to argue that Linux desktop is still in the same state as it was in 1997.
Google Express: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0F6SnbqUcE
Is not being able to read code from six months ago just a Perl thing?
Google reverses Gmail April 1 prank
Fixed costs aren't totally fixed, it's just that they won't change for every unit produced. But it may be the case that they will change when you produce say an additional 100 units (or 1,000 or 10,000 units).

So if you ramp up production and you need for example an additional factory, that means your fixed costs will go up.
Although bsder was snarky as fuck when he wrote the above comment, I don't think he should be downvoted for it. I mean, frankly, I agree with the sentiment.

A lot of unicorn fillies seriously try to base their model around doing as little as possible, as flashy as possible, with as little expense as possible.

On paper, that is a great idea, everyone should do it, viva la venture capital, etc. In reality, it isn't shareholder value you need to provide: it is customer value. If you are not a valuable product or service to your customers, you have no shareholder value.

A lot of silicon valley venture capitalists forget that very important distinction, and we are well on our way to Dot Bomb 2.0, repeating the late 90s clusterfuck that made a few billion dollars vanish overnight.

To tie this into the "advanced economy" theme, an advanced economy doesn't inflate bubbles. America still inflates bubbles: we aren't as advanced as we think we are, but we are improving.
Gmail April Fools joke is a dumpster fire
ThinkGeek

Vertical Landing Mentos & Diet Coke Rocket: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivph/?pfm=HP_Carousel_DietC...

Star Trek White Noise Sleep Machine: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivmt/?pfm=HP_Carousel_White...

VR Sensory Immersion Generator: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivpl/?pfm=HP_Carousel_VRGen...

Flavor of the Day Desktop Calendar: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivlp/?pfm=HP_FeaturedProduc...

Useless Light Switch: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivlq/?pfm=HP_FeaturedProduc...

Attack on Titan Colossal Titan Lawn Ornament: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivnr/?pfm=HP_FeaturedProduc...

Plumbus: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivns/?pfm=HP_FeaturedProduc...

baRPG: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivov/?pfm=HP_FeaturedProduc...

Magic: The Gathering - Travel Edition: http://www.thinkgeek.com/product/ivpi/?pfm=HP_FeaturedProduc...
Right to both points -- that's how I read it too. You could call it "crippleware", though autopilot hardware (albeit on a 2018 car, though on the other hand in 35k of 2018 dollars) ain't exactly cheap. It's probably more economical for Tesla to build the cars with the same h/w and then upcharge for the s/w. And it's nice to have the opportunity to do a software update for it if you later want it, even though I know some don't like the crippleware "feel". And yes, I also heard them saying the safety stuff will be standard. Again, makes sense. Nobody wants the bad PR of installing safety hardware, but some poor family got killed by their Unsafe Tesla Car (TM) because of a software feature that was disabled by Evilon Musk.
Free software vector drawing application Inkscape supports these spiro curves in its UI. It is an option you can select for the curves and lines drawing tool.
So the claims as you specify them are those of Barry Brill not the IPCC:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Brill

"New Zealand politician and a lawyer." "He was also involved with the New Zealand Climate Science Education Trust, a charitable organisation that, according to the National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), appears to have been set up solely to take court action against them. The trust lost two court cases against NIWA and on both occasions, was ordered to pay costs. NIWA has put the trust into liquidation and as of 2014 was considering to pursue Brill and another trustee for the owed money.[7]"

His claims are, of course, a distortion of what really happened, and are based on what he and those like him call the "hiatus." Which is also misinterpretation of the curve of the temperature change, and which those especially liked before the last two years that broke most of the records.

I see only the agenda there, and again, scientific illiteracy.
A quick analysis of Google play app store optimization (ASO) tips
Microservices Weekly (Issue #20): This week's news/articles on microservices
It is a 100% different type of database. Druid is olap while scylladb is oltp. They have nothing in common (except for the "columnar" name)
It's not that difficult to abuse power in the non-profit system. I'm not referring to blatant theft by an employee, but other shinagigans usually by the founders--like mixing personal assets with the non-profit assets.

1. Is the non-profit in Deleware? So many shady non-profits set up shop in Deleware. When you read the requirements you will see exactly why. I've gotten to the point, I will only listen to CA non-profits when it comes to donating. California has some stringent requirements.

2. Yes--they have rules, and procedures, but there's a lot of people who don't follow the rules. The rules are getting harder to get around, but so many non-profits are there for one reason. The reason--provide a job, and a good wage to the founders. The Obama administration enacted rules that make non-profits more transparent though.

3. I have watched a few non-profit founders make, usually a husband and wife, very rich. I could go on at lenght, but tired, and it seems like no one really cares.

4. When ever I get someone asking for money for their little non-profit, I go to, forget the name--Guidestar. I download the free preview. I go to the bottom of all the pages, and look at their 1040's. I then look for the one, or two people making a lot of money. There's always one, or two individuals. I get so discouraged, and wonder if anyone in these nonprofits really cares about what they proclaim.
The demo on that site is cute. Mobile device required.
> On a per-unit sold basis, Tesla Model S is wildly profitable, with a gross margin north of 30% [1].

I didn't read the article, but it's from 2012. Gross margins hace declined from 27.6% in 2014 to 22.8%. In fact in the fourth quarter the gross margin was just 18%, below Toyota, Daimler, BMW, Nissan, Renault, Hyunday, Kia (all in the range 18.9-20.1%) and Honda (22.9%). To be fair it was 19.2% for Tesla's automotive division. And after excluding a number of nasty thing the company can get to a better looking 25%. But I'm not sure this qualifies as "wildly profitable".
But if you knew how an NSL worked, how could you say?
That's possible, true, but the company deemed it too expensive to supply everyone with two computers and then pay for VS licenses on the top of Xamarin licensing (already rather pricey)
Did you check the pros and cons of both?
.potato file format: https://medium.com/@gifs/gifs-com-has-created-a-budding-new-...

https://gifs.com
I suspect it could have a HUD (Head up display) to show the driver basic information (speed, navigation etc). Everything else can be on the center console.

Look at the citroen cactus dashboard and make it more Tesla-like http://images.autowereld.com/high/78673-image.jpg
Sure, if you wait long enough ;)
Yeah, that talk is pretty awesome. It's indirectly responsible for my current job and my taste in anime. I honestly can't thank Larry enough, but I do what I can by helping Perl 6 succeed.
https://gifs.com introduces the .potato file format https://medium.com/@gifs/gifs-com-has-created-a-budding-new-...
The most recent version of WebKit does not automatically mean that it's a scheduled build directly based off of their development branch. I agree that's the most reasonable way to do it, and it's what it implies. And it's easy to assume that's what they're doing. But they could just as easily be putting this in an intermediate tech preview branch and pulling individual commits.

The phrase "most recent version" could mean pulling from a dev branch, using the last successful build, pulling from a release branch, pulling from a testing branch, assigning arbitrary numbers and tags to commits and pulling from there, or even working from a staging repo where they cherrypick commits. These are all separate sources that could hve their own version series, and "most recent version" is a very relative statement. Anyone who's seen the divide between development and sales knows that phrase has enough wiggle room to fit a Challenger disaster inside, and marketing is Apple's specialty.

I really hope they start to pull the changes from WebKit. Safari sorely needs it. But Apple's not the kind of company you just take at their word unless it's independently verified. I get it if you want to believe. That's sweet. But I'd rather wait for the tests.

Even then, monthly builds are still not a public release schedule for Safari. It was six months with only minor fixes between 9.0 and 9.1. We're far more interested in a public stable release with usable ES6 support than builds with unstable features that won't be usable on sites this year. If preview builds were what would solve the problem, then the WebKit Nightlies would have been enough.
Everyone here told you that you have to use spf. But beaware that you need to put the directive -all and not the ~all. Just take care of this point as it's very important!

Second please check all of your systems that your email password is entered atleast once. Maybe a system has a spyware or virus or something.

Third change your email's password.

Except you are 100% sure that the spammer is not using your MTA then you just use an spf with the -all directive!
Announcing the Great Unicorn Meat Grinder
The difference is that Apple events are strictly invitation only, so the audience tends to be full of journalists and other press people. It's serious to the point where people who make Apple unhappy won't be extended an invite (like the iPhone prototype scandal a few years back).

This audience seems to be anyone who'd pre-ordered the model 3, so the general (Bay Area?) public. As a result it sounds like a terrible mix between an American stand-up show, a rock concert and a cheesy sitcom where everyone applauds when the main character coughs. Hence also everyone videoing the event on their phones - it's not even like a gig where you'd have to pay for the video...

(They also do this at Apple, but people seem to be a lot more covert about recording.)
I fail to see how this disproves that phenotype can alter genotype through the speed of mutations. The point is that after environmental change there is a limited timeframe when a population can develop a trait essential for survival in the new situation. If the rate of mutations is low, the whole population will simply die.

However, if by phenotype changes the mutation rate can be increased, then the population can adopt. In that case the new genotype trait essential for survival will be available only in offspring coming from phenotype that allowed faster rate of mutations. This is a data flow from phenotype to DNA.