skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A. That's not what "demeaning" means.

B. As others have said 6:00 AM is among the most likely time that most working professionals will be home.

C. I'm not sure what his status as an exit node operator has to do with the hour at which a search is executed?
Seems to have just taken awhile for GH to show it as verified. Working now!
How people look is a pretty poor indicator of their performance. If the people being referenced actually lack maturity, then provide statements to support that.

When people don't have any actual evidence to support their claims, they use bullshit phrases designed to push emotion over facts.
The crypto might be superior, but we do not know for sure that Whatsapp/Facebook is not covertly decrypting the messages and funneling through some Prism v2 NSA surveillance operation.
Thank you, i agree with you on this one, will def. do something about this ;)
Well finally ! I've been lamenting about signed commits for a while.
In the US this deal is effectively irrelevant because the host network of the TNF game already has digital streaming rights. e.g. if the game is on CBS, CBS is also streaming it online, as they did last year. Twitter can also serve US customers the stream, but they're carrying CBS' stream, including all CBS ads, so they effectively are providing a free distribution network for the networks, presumably just to draw users to the service (though I fail to see how streaming video has anything to do with Twitter, every service is trying to be everything to everyone).

Outside of the US is where this deal has real relevance, because the US networks often geo-restrict their feeds. Though again it will be carrying the US network feed and ads.

Which is why Twitter "won" this bid with only $10M. It isn't really a big deal.
> I like the enthusiasm but I don't like the lack of awareness.

Why not communicate that? Otherwise you're shutting down everything, enthusiasm included. Some of this is style: my example response is pretty middle-of-the-road IMO. But there's a difference between a "quick to the point explanation" that helps the green dev develop necessary decision-making (and other) skills, and something that's the equivalent of "Hssss! My precious!"
This might be a dumb question, but is there any reason other than costs that we couldn't eventually just blast unrecycleable nuclear waste off into the sun/space? There must be an inflection point where the cost of storing the hazardous material safely on earth is more expensive after a period of time than just sending it out of orbit on a space elevator/ICBM.
>That doesn't seem very well made to me.

Disclaimer: I think the Model S is a good car.

It's an unsubstantiated myth, just like the Tesla is the safest and fastest car on the road. The fact is, we don't know much about the maintenance record of these cars, because there aren't that many and they haven't been on the road long.
In that case, Bend or Ashland or something else closer to more outdoor stuff is a better bet. Or Lakeview if you really want cheap housing.
If you work in in any sort of time-sheets based model: WakaTime (https://wakatime.com/) is indispensable.
Get Website Hits – SEO25.COM
> I read the law, and I don't see where it does that.

That's okay; a lot of people have reading deficits, and in fact my company works a lot to help people with them. One thing we've found helps with reading deficits is breaking things down, so let's do that.

First, load up http://www.ncleg.net/Sessions/2015E2/Bills/House/PDF/H2v1.pd... in another browser window. That's the actual bill text, presented as a diff.

HB2 has three parts. The first part is about bathrooms, and the second part prohibits cities have a minimum wage other than the state's, so I'm going to completely ignore those two bits.

That leaves part III. Part III has three main parts. Here's what they do:

Part III, Section 3.1(c), says that only the state definitions of protected classes matter, and that local municipalities cannot define their own: "this Article and other applicable provisions of the General Statutes supersede and preempt any ordinance, regulation, resolution, or policy adopted or imposed by a unit of local government or other political subdivision of the State". So the only protected classes are those defined by the state.

Part III, Section 3.2, adds the line, "This Article does not create, and shall not be construed to create or support, a statutory or common law private right of action, and no person may bring any civil action based upon the public policy expressed herein." This is technical language, but "private right of action", in this context, means "bring a suit." Thus, only the state can bring action; you can't. And due to Part III, Section 3.1(c), local cities cannot create their own laws that do permit this. Thus, the first part of my statement: you are now barred from suing for discrimination, and must rely on the state.

Finally, Part III, Section 3.3(a), redefines the state's protected classes to include "race, religion, color, national origin, or biological sex". Since sexual orientation and gender identity are not included here, and Part III Section 3.1 forbade cities from having their own protected classes, we have now prohibited the entire LGBT community from being declared a protected class, and therefore the state is under no obligation (and, in fact, has no legal basis) to bring discrimination complaints about sexual orientation.
Ain't CMS – The content management system that’s not
I love your counter-argument: "this guy landed rockets, so he will make happen whatever" :D

Oook...look I'm cheering for this but then there is this thing called "reality".

And I'm not even say it won't happen, but I'm doubting whether it will be sustainable in terms of the obligation a company has with its shareholders.

Producing so many cars requires crazy amount of capital and that capital will yield very little on this model...and yes on top of it competition will come...can Tesla be a sustainably profitable company pursuing this strategy? That's my question.
This submission broke the HN guidelines by cherry-picking a detail from the article and using that for the title ("340 to 620 litres of water are used for every litre of soft drink produced"). That is editorializing, and it's not allowed here. The HN rule says to change the original title only when it is misleading or baity (https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html). We've changed this one back to the original, truncated to fit HN's 80 char limit.

You can see from this thread how powerfully a discussion is determined by the title when people do this. That's why we don't allow it. On HN, being the first (or luckiest) submitter of an article confers no special rights over the story. You don't get to frame it for others—they can and should make up their own minds. For that we need titles that reflect the content itself, not submitter spin.

If you'd like to point out what you think is important about a story, you're welcome to do so in the thread, where your opinion is on a level playing field with everyone else's. The title, though, should be that of the article or (when necessary to change it) an accurate and neutral description drawn from the article.

There's no more important single factor in making HN the substantive place we want it to be. The effect of an editorialized title is much stronger than you might think; in this case it was nearly total. I should remember this one to use as an example in the future.
Imagining Zootopia (How Disney Built the Zootopia World)
...and if even one of the trillion comets over a billion years had some spore or cell frozen inside...
You can say say the same about Telegram, can you not?
Note what you just referenced. You're replacing low cost labour for high cost labour, but increasing the value of that labour.

Cost is what you give up for something.

Value is what you get for it.

Price is what you pay on the market.

They're three distinct concepts. Much economic confusion results from it.

(And yes, there are some who describe "value" as "market value", which I refer to as price. See though "economic value.)
Yeah I agree with most of the sentiment but I let it by when you go to the github repo and check out contributor statistics. Pretty much it's just sokra doing everything and he does it in his free time last I heard. I think webpack is missing the support it needs in regards to how much it's actually getting used.
Go Package for HTTP/2 Apple Push Notification Service
> About a month after people started doing it, the league stepped in to say that live streams constituted "broadcast without consent" and most people stopped doing it.

Think this is a very overlooked part of the deal. I'd imagine NFL will not give explicit permission but look the other way if people post videos on Twitter. Very powerful for increasing interaction and introducing people who are new to the service (follow _____ for ____ games)
Ah, that makes sense, thank you for the feedback.

When I was drafting it in Google Docs, I was using footnote annotations, and I just copypasta'd it over.
can't get to the page.

is the load over 9000?
There is a fairly extensive plan for building out IDE support for Rust: https://www.rust-lang.org/ides.html
Click on (or open in a new tab) the comment timestamp link of the comment you wish to reply to and you'll see the reply link. I think HN stops showing the reply link after three levels into a thread to discourage possible flamewars/threads going off the reservation
PM from a fraud detection company here. One thing I didn't see mentioned on this thread is Device ID, which is very common on fraud detection platforms. When a user comes to your website or mobile app, you have access to hundreds of signals from their device. Some like IP address are easy to spoof. Others like whether the user has changed their phone alarm from the default settings are often ignored by fraudsters but surprisingly telling signals (fraudsters don't bother to change from default settings). We wrote an article on some interesting findings recently here: https://simility.com/device-recon-results/.
A good device ID product can not only tell if the same fraudster is accessing your app repeatedly while pretending to be different users, it can detect risky user profiles when they land on your app. Before they even make a payment.
I'm not sure what they are supposed to do if exit node ips have bad reputation.
I don't, I like having long stretches of time without distractions. Then I can choose when I want to catch up on mails and when I want to get to work. Please let me keep browsing the web like this too.
https://developer.paypal.com/docs/classic/products/payflow-g...
Do you not see the vast number of connections that can be drawn to today's dragnet surveillance discussions? I think this article adds some really intriguing and thought-provoking context to our current debate.

Nevertheless, you're breakin da rules, son! https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
>should I keep going?

No, you shouldn't. We get it, your current car is a lemon and you consider the Tesla, a car which you don't even own but drove for one day, to be of superior quality.

What exactly are you arguing?
t͡ɬ is a phoneme in Nahuatl [0] (Voiceless alveolar lateral affricate [1] if you care to hear it), which explains why many Nahuatl words have sequences of "tl". I don't know if there's a specific reason why these words end with that sound (it doesn't have to be a suffix).

Edit: yes, it's a suffix (for Classical Nahuatl): "Non-possessed nouns take a suffix called the absolutive. This suffix takes the form -tl after vowels (ā-tl, "water") and -tli after consonants [...]" ([2]).

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nahuatl#Phonology

1:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voiceless_alveolar_lateral_aff...

2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_Nahuatl_grammar
I just wrote in a thread over on reddit how I use Chrome specifically for its implementation of desktop notifications. Native notifications on OSX are lacking to say the least. They show very little information when compared to Chrome. I hope this is an option that can be switched off when rolled out to stable at a later date.
They have copies of CP collected as evidence, therefore they are distributing it? By this logic, the DEA evidence locker might make them the biggest crack dealer in the US.
Notably, the name is capitalized, as a proper name should be: “What is GitLab Pages?”.
I wonder if you can come up with any tangible evidence to back up your claim...
Exactly! Or even people who just haven't learned a whole lot in terms of engineering practices. This seems to be especially true in Ruby, where "it works" is good enough to go out into production.

There is no programming, reliability, stability, or scale. Most greener engineers program mostly for the sunny day scenario, which is the crux of the problem.

They can't see race conditions and timing problems like someone how have spent years doing that. I see other people's code and quickly understand that they're doing really cost prohibitive queries while others who are green will never notice it.
Does signal still rely on Google's marketplace and services being installed?
> You can also completely disable them so you're never asked for permission
Hm, I'm still not sure I understand.

> The point is that in a synchronous design the delays have to be multiples of a clock cycle.

Not really, you can pretty much always do rebalancing between stages so that you end up with a multiple of the clock. And if you can't, you can locally skew the clock to borrow time between stages.

> Also it takes time to schedule instructions. In a simple processor with a 5 stage pipeline you can simply stall the entire pipeline, but since you stall all other instructions too, this is costly.

This is an unrelated higher level architectural distinction then asynchronous vs synchronous. The scheduling cost doesn't go away when you use asynchronous circuits.

Also why is stalling bad here? If the circuit takes 16 gate delays on some inputs and 6 gate delays on others, it doesn't matter if we use async or sync design; a fast operation behind a slow operation is still going to wait (stall) for the operation in front of it to complete. That's just a fundamental property of in order execution (which again, isn't related to async or sync circuits)

> And in a modern superscalar out-of-order processor, stall is even more expensive and you cannot reschedule all instructions for the next cycle at the end of the previous cycle because rescheduling is too complex.

What? In canonical OoO design, the default is stall! An instruction will only ever proceed to the next stage if it's dependencies have been satisfied. When a stall happens you don't need to reschedule because the instruction won't have been scheduled in the first place!

The important part from the grandparent was this:

"Ideally, it might also mean you don't need to design your pipeline quite so carefully: in a clocked design, a single slow path slows down the entire pipeline; in an asynchronous design, that one particular path may be slow, but that doesn't slow down everyone else."

Which is true! If you do a bad job of balancing your pipeline stages (or can't balance them statically because of variation/whatever) then the single slow path slows down the entire clock. However, when you can rebalance the pipeline statically, as in the example give, there's no reason that you have to design your pipeline to wait for the slowest path.

But perhaps I misunderstood the example; let me know if I'm missing anything.
Most residential ISPs in the US, at least. Certainly all of the big ones do (Comcast, Time Warner, AT&T, Verizon, etc); the FTC has actually specifically recommended that all US ISPs block outbound port 25 as a spam mitigation measure.
There's a setting for this! Chrome allows you to deny all notifications requests automatically, without even a prompt coming up.

See https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/3220216 for the method.
Let's break down the terse response: "Get away from that -- it's mine, not yours. Please do your job and leave me to mine."

As the junior dev, what am I taking away from this? The core message ("I shouldn't have done that thing I did.") is crystal clear. But WHY. Did I configure it wrong? Is there some process I'm not aware of? Is Senior Dev even right, or is he just a possessive jerk? Are there other rules I don't know about that I'm going to suddenly trip over?

You can play the "figure it out" card and not "coddle" them. That's an approach, but it's not a very effective one. At the very least, tell them what to do, not what not to do.
I don't know what point you're trying to make here. Everyone who lives there was free to put a driveway on their property, presumably, but just chose to deal with the hassle of tight street parking in exchange for more room for yard or house on their property. Allowing them this tradeoff is very much freer!
And yet Danes can somehow still afford them.

I live in Norway where many of the same conditions pertain. I suspect that one reason for there not being a minimum wage here is that unemployment is low, which means that you have to pay a reasonable amount in order to get someone to work for you.
Our team started using reviewable.io a few weeks ago, and I quite like it so far. It solves the "squash/rebase->force-push->lose history" problem with Github PR review.
Except the communications were going through TOR in his house. If police traced the packets exiting from him, that means they already got the public IP server the porn was sent from or to, but it passed through his computer as the visible endpoint.

That meant it either proceeded elsewhere on the TOR network or stayed on his machine, and they had no external way of knowing without checking his hard drives.
Humans without experience with either sport could potentially run into the same difficulty distinguishing them. For instance, how would one tell the difference between Aussie-rule football and rugby based on a picture?
If your commits aren't marked as verified in the repository, push a new signed commit to that repo. Then GitHub should start marking your commits (even the old ones) are verified. Apparently this needs to be done per-repo, it's not global to your account.

I guess that's the way they check if you are the owner of that key.

Edit: clarified
So an Android app in no way affiliated with the maintainers of PGP, GnuPG, or the key servers in question published your private information, that you gave it voluntarily, to a by-design decentralized key distribution system and it's somehow their fault?

You're publishing completely public information on the internet. Even in a world where key servers will delete your key that doesn't really help you when anyone has access.

The best you can do is mark your keys as invalid by submitting a revocation certificate.

> If you still have the private key, you can use your PGP software to generate a revocation certificate, and upload that to the keyserver. The exact procedure for generating a revocation certificate varies depending on what PGP software you are using, please consult the documentation for more information. This will not delete your key from the key server, but it will tell people who download it that the key has been revoked, and should not be used.

If you're annoyed that unpublishing something on the internet is futile there are a lot of government officials and celebrities who will sympathize with you.
you can currently buy NFL's gamepass outside the us (i paid mine in brazilian reais) and stream every single game.
does it matter that you had to implement 12 fixups at various points

If you want to come back later during a git bisect and find out exactly when that bug that just took down your production application was introduced, then yes, absolutely. I'd rather look through 12 small commits than one monster one for that use case.

Look at it this way - a bisect cuts the search space in half with each progression, so you can double the number of commits being searched with the relatively minor cost of adding one more call to bisect when bughunting.

If you're tagging your milestones appropriately and otherwise practicing good repo hygiene, having n number of extra commits for any value of n is a feature, not a bug.
Kik introduces bot store ahead of Facebook
> The interior of the lowest end BMW/Merc/Audi cars (3series/C-Class/A4) are so much nicer than the interior of a model S so as to be stupefying.

You can choose a drive train that has been more-or-less unchanged for many decades, with all the money spent on the interior, or you can choose a revolutionary drive train, with a basic interior.

It's simply your choice.
Interesting regardless of morality.
Disclosure: soon-to-be team member at GitLab

I'd argue GitLab had a late start and has been making significant progress since it started, and based on their Changelog they've been developing a lot of new features for the last year and a half at least (every .x update is released monthly on the 22nd): https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/raw/master/CHANGELOG

Personally, I definitely have a fairly competitive attitude towards GitHub, and I'm motivated to push faster whenever they release a new feature :)

So yeah, competition is awesome :D
Well, "just out of high school" can mean that he looked young face/dress/etc-wise.

It can also mean that he looked AND acted inexperienced, immature, bro-ish, etc.
It looks like Noise leaves an implementer with more than enough rope to hang themselves with - for example, it allows unauthenticated Diffie-Hellman, it appears to permit user-selected handshake sequences, has 16(!) different official handshake sequences with subtly different properties, each of which allow payloads to be attached to any message in the handshake process that in turn have different levels of reduced security, etc.
wrong - those jobs are currently needed at a specific pay rate. They may not be needed if hourly wage is raised enough that automation is cheaper.
If the question has some inittial guess like "soccer" then this guess should be added up, as a Bayessian point of view.
Gamma Waves, DMT, Meditation, Hypnosis, and the Corpus Callosum (Part 2)
> in order for you to have the basis to discuss an argument with the other side, you need to be able to state the other side's argument in a way that the other side would not disagree with, then you get to make your point.

This a great way of phrasing what I'd been thinking about as "arguing from someone else's shoes".
When you put it that way it sounds fairly reasonable.

Nonetheless I firmly believe the answer is yes, since the alternative means Musk has failed in his mission to move the world over to electric transport, and I have a hard time picturing him failing in that fashion.

I just find it incredibly hard to picture Musk in 2025 during an interview "Yes, we failed with Tesla because...etc etc, achieved an incredible amount of progress in 12 years but ultimately were unable to etc etc"

Like, he'd rather be homeless on the street than let the company fail. He'll give up his last penny for it. I know you consider this irrelevant, but I simply don't. His track record is too strong to ignore.
Gentrification makes housing more expensive in the short term. First order, that's good for landlords and bad for renters. Mixed for owner-occupiers - they have more wealth, but higher property taxes.
Wow I can't believe I've never heard of this. This is cool. Thanks for posting it.
For me, the range isn't an issue. I rarely drive my motorcycle more than 50 miles in a day and only around 600-1000 miles per year.

I really like the low maintenance aspect. Not having to do oil changes would be nice (because I don't ride much, I'm changing my oil every 400 miles).