skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The total setup you need is equivalent to what you'd need to do with Clojure.

1. Install runtime (JVM/CL implementation)

2. Install dependency loader (Leiningen/Quicklisp)

3. Install any native libraries required.

4. Get the package itself.

The last step is currently manual, but will be automated once Sketch is in a Quicklisp dist.
Why don’t I know any single men?
Vote in people who would change that. Or get out while you still can get exit visa.
Or assign teams of workers to a geographic area, and empower them to make any repairs needed in it. The supervisor drives the roads, takes notes on what needs work, and schedules the team to take care of it.
You'd need a balancing trick besides just the magnets otherwise you'll end up with a positive feedback loop terminating in contact, but there are some interesting ways around this (that you can also 'roll out' to apply linearly):

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrodynamic_bearing
Or buys horsepower and drives on tires and suspension!
>a huge wealth and status divide between those born with high IQs and those born with normal IQs //

Are you saying that's the primary reason for the status divide? Any citations that support that, the most recent research I've seem looked at societal status/wealth of families a few generations back and then traced living descendants to find how stratified things were. They found a high degree of stratification; that across generations it was far less likely that poor ancestors had wealthy descendants. Perhaps IQ goes this way too?

>High IQ people commit less crimes //

Or get caught less often. Wealthy people (in the UK) often commit some common crimes at what seems like a far larger rate because the penalty is usually just a fine and to the wealthy it's pocket-change [speeding, parking offences, tax evasion ...].
Behind the scenes of the DeepMind challenge match
Arguably, Magento (Varien).
9^9^9 is still wrong.

0 takes up more space, and therefore three zeros will be the `largest` number you can represent in terms of area. Thus, even his daughter must be marked wrong.
Origin site posted earlier today and a month ago, the latter with 79 comments:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11154294
The hull looks remarkably like an ass
And yet if people did save and invest aggressively in their 20s and 30s we would not be talking about wealth inequality to nearly the degree we are now.
Code: debugging the gender gap
So what are other trustworthy places to buy electronics? Seems like if you don't buy at Apple or Amazon (without 3rd party sellers), there's no way of knowing if an item is counterfeit. Which harms the market as they can charge higher prices...
If one wants to give an award for clever typographical thinking, then of course the teacher should consider an external discretionary reward.

If one wants to bring a lawyer to school to argue from a place of typographic visual logic, please be correct. The Common Core is right to question for the largest number possible with three digits. The Common Core implementation could say, "without operators", but then you'd have to explain what operators are and then not touch upon it again, and that becomes disconnected trivia. Otherwise, "without operators" is just there to stop another incident with a lawyer.

Self-efficacy is indeed important to a student's math success and interest. I don't think that correctly correcting a student will lead to unrealistic self-efficacy. I was being charitable by entertaining the logic of visual implicitness, which has little to do with math.

And one's self efficacy is a function of more than whether a teacher gives you an almost perfect score, if not for the accurately graded 3 digit problem. It's built by countless complex environmental feedback.
I'm not sure what you're saying here; Facebook does more research than some universities. Their propensity for experimenting on their users is well-documented, and while I disagree with their ethics, they do produce significant, relevant and valid results.
Microsoft is Internet Explorer 6 of Open Source
Soulstrong: Photos and Interviews about Depression and related challenges at MIT
>As compared to me, where I think that new technologies are coming, but they’re occurring at an amazingly slow pace.

This is problem with economists analyzing technological growth in the economy. They think there must a new google or iphone to come out every 10 years.

20 years ago very few people have ever sent an e-mail. Now I can send an e-mail/call anybody from any place on the earth. We are making significant technological progress and it's where the most growth is at the moment.
Generic internet podcasts do this as well, sometimes with one in the middle.

Tell us we're being advertised to, give us a good deal relevant to our interests, you and the advertiser both win.
You don't have to be in debt, paying your credit card in full each month is an excellent way to build credit, and you will never pay a cent in interest as long as you pay in full without fail.

I can see how it all appears to be a silly game if you never actually need credit, however there are material benefits (cash-back, rental car insurance, etc) of playing the game. In some cases the benefits you receive are nonsensical until you realize they are subsidized by irresponsible individuals paying huge sums of interest. There's a special kind of smug pleasure reserved for those who are financially responsible in America.
You're assuming IQ correlates with some capitalist notion of success, and genetic engineering can significantly improve IQ.

Both are debatable.

Empirically, many people with high IQs do badly financially, for a variety of reasons - not least because IQ doesn't correlate with ambition, creativity, strategic insight, mental health, empathy, or social skills.

Practically I'd expect useful intelligence enhancement would be incredibly difficult, with many potential side effects.

If you want to improve population intelligence, it may be better to invest in better nutrition, health care, and education.

>High IQ people commit less crimes

Or do they just get caught less often, and convicted less often if they're caught?
KQED[1] does this; when you make a donation during their pledge drive, You get access to a secondary web stream without the pledge breaks.

[1] NPR San Francisco
That's my point. You would still have lots of space left on a 1TB SSD.
Each parameter (declared or hidden) that they inject in their calculation is carefully designed to decrease the inequality. No wonder they obtain a measurement with less inequality. Anyway, they did not really need all to go to such great lengths to get this result, since they do really care about it and their conclusion is mostly unrelated to it.

Economists... Economic science... It would be more honest not to disguise oneself under scientific methods, and that should be renamed "economic politics" (and while we are at it, let's rename sociology to "politics" and philosophy to "religion", everything will be clearer).
Right; this is the definition of the numerator (the number of false positives). The false positive RATE also has a denominator, which is defined as the total number of tests performed (the second case in the parent poster's question).

Dividing by the number of positive tests instead gives what's called the 'false discovery rate' which is pretty rarely used.
There are many ways in which you can incorrectly interpret statements on Wikipedia, which is why specialized textbooks and so forth still have use.
John Maynard Keynes is a “commie” now? Here’s what he had to say about the USSR:

“How can I accept a doctrine, which sets up as its bible, above and beyond criticism, an obsolete economic textbook which I know to be not only scientifically erroneous but without interest or application to the modern world? How can I adopt a creed which, preferring the mud to the fish, exalts the boorish proletariat above the bourgeois and intelligentsia who, with whatever faults, are the quality of life and surely carry the seeds of all human advancement? Even if we need a religion, how can we find it in the turbid rubbish of the Red bookshops. It is hard for an educated, decent, intelligent son of Western Europe to find his ideals here, unless he has first suffered some strange and horrid process of conversion which has changed all his values.”
I understand the concern with too many layers but you have it wrong in this case.

The low level platform is Kubernetes. This is a managed service on Google Cloud, or you can run the open source project on other substrates.

What you are seeing here from Redspread is a super easy way to run kube locally.

Redspread represents a growing suite of tools to make managing stuff on Kubernetes easy anywhere.

The best analogy I've seen for the pattern is "porcelain" and "plumbing", which I learned from Git.

We certainly need pipes and valves everywhere. But we really want a toilet and sink, simple specialized interfaces to the holes in the ground.

Kube is low level plumbing for managing raw compute and network resources.

Kube itself has some higher level tools. But it's great that Redspread is making some too. There are plenty of unique use cases and workflows we all want
> You can literally intentionally download and run any virus, with full confidence that you can easily stop it from doing anything you dont want it to. Since a dialog box is created before it can read or write to any file, there is literally nothing it can do without your permission.

What about a virus that reads your keystrokes or screenshots your screen and sends them to the Internet? Or a virus that spams or does DDOS attacks?
Productivity growth has been tremendous over the last two decades, and workers have been producing more and more, but that hasn't been translating into income gains

People are (more or less) paid for their time and not their productivity. That they are not getting paid more suggests that the supply of worker hours has been more or less keeping up with the demand.
Invest? Invest what???
Will These FinTech Startups Disrupt Incumbents?
>Perhaps IQ goes this way too?

Yes. IQ is highly heritable.

Gwern has a good page covering this research: http://www.gwern.net/iq

As most people desire wealth and intelligent people are better at achieving their desires, wealthy people tend to have higher IQs on average than less-wealthy people. This has class implications as IQ is highly heritable. This isn't good or just; it's just the state of things. When I was young I was a blank slatist, but the world kept disappointing me. Marvin's razor:the most depressing explanation is likely be the truth.

> Or get caught less often.

I suppose smart criminals are less likely to get caught. Nice selection effect there, but I doubt it accounts for much of the difference.
I think public services in general have a different concept of what advertising means, compared to the private sector. It's almost like the advertiser is a donor rather than a client.

With private sector advertising, I almost expect the ads to be garish. If the only goal is to make money, then market forces push for the ads to become more and more invasive until you basically can't view the content thanks to all the ads.

I'm sure I'm echoing what many people have said before, but we need to find a way for content to stop being a cost center and start to become the actual source of revenue.
Empirically, on average they do better. There are brilliant losers. But brilliant people, on average, are wealthier and have higher status than less-brilliant people. Also, I suspect conscientiousness (another big factor in success) has a significant heritable component.

>If you want to improve population intelligence, it may be better to invest in better nutrition, health care, and education.

We've already plucked this fruit. Genetic engineering of embryos to IQs higher than any living human looks possible without side effects, as alleles that effect intelligence aren't likely to be additive: http://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3421
I'm not sure that's the best example. Median farm family incomes are a good 30% higher than median non-farm family incomes in the US [1], and farming comes with benefits like really low cost of living. Farming is quite a lucrative profession.

[1] http://www.usda.gov/documents/FARM_FAMILY_INCOME.pdf
Frictionless gears? That'd be pretty handy on a trying-to-be-quiet nuclear submarine.
The traditional way (that I'm aware of) of defining the false positive rate is derived from the conditional probability of a positive prediction given that the true underlying state is negative:

False Pos. Rate = P(predict + | state -)
= P(predict + and state -) / P(state -)
= P(predict + and state -) / (P(predict + and state-) + P(predict - and state -))
~ #FP/samplesize / (#FP/samplesize + #TN/samplesize)
= #FP / (#FP + #TN)

The latter quantity is usually given as the definition of false positive rate. Roughly speaking, it's the ratio of how often you predict positive when the state is negative versus how often the state is negative.
Flexport is hiring to bring the world free trade
I stopped buying brand name macbook chargers when the plastic on the cable frayed on my fourth charger. The difference from the other three times was that this time, it started smoking where it frayed. Had I not been paying attention, who knows what would have happened. I took it to the apple store and told them what happened and that I had bought it from them within the year, asking for a replacement. They said it was excluded from the warranty because it was "normal wear and tear" or something like that.

Say what you will for the counterfeits, but they use heavy plastic and actually seem less likely to burn down your apartment. And cost a fraction of the brand ones.
You're stuck in a groove. The whole thing could have been avoided, that is the point. But once people start digging in over something that should have just received a pass (note that it was you, not them that brought up tetration, which - unlike exponentiation - probably does not figure into their worldview of math to begin with) then you can expect all kinds of further confrontations.

The school messed up, pure and simple, everything else was just part of the avalanche that followed.

Feel free to try to out-do the world on the pedantry scale but you're not being productive and you are willfully missing the point.
Oh that is alarmingly sad.
I could be mistaken but this is what I gathered from what the people who worked on AlphaGo said in various interviews and videos:

AlphaGo does not use brute force at all. It uses a neural network to find interesting moves, and this in effect limits the search space.

In addition, when AlphaGo "reads" moves (aka performs a tree search) it doesn't go all the way to the end of the game. It stops somewhere and asks another neural network to "evaluate" the board position, and figure out who is it favorable for. I'm thinking the neural network will also place some kind of probability on its evaluation, so it might give something like "this board position is 58% favorable for black".

In that way, it's very similar to how a professional player plays the game.

One difference I have noticed, which is probably the weakness that Lee Sedol exposed in game #4, is that AlphaGo does not do a thorough reading of "delicate" or "complicated" situation. I believe that a top professional would look at a complex situation and start considering moves that are not usually considered otherwise.

Another thing is that a professional would imagine a board position they want to arrive at, then try to search for a sequence of moves that allows them to reach that board position. This is specially the case in complex situations like what happened during game #4 where AlphaGo made a mistake
A little uncomfortable that a company that spends $10m lobbying the government in its interests, is also now doing social policy research using their near-monopoly on a particular sort of people's data. (This one, for instance, ties into social mobility which is always an argument that has currency with politicians.) Quite what they're arguing for behind the scenes is unknown ... but then that's part of the problem.
Encouraging this style of programming makes me sad.
I always assumed full-stack was backend language plus SQL as well as the web server and server OS. So, the L and A in LAMP. Keep in mind that I started in 1996 or so, and only started hearing "full-stack" in recent years.

e.g., using common options:

- A front end web developer would be HTML/CSS.
- A back end web developer would be HTML/CSS/MySQL/PHP (or equivalent).
- Full-stack all of the above plus Apache and Linux.
Protip: anything that follows the word Protip is at least 50% tongue in cheek.
Yes, but for what reason? If productivity is going up, that means fewer hours are needed to produce the same amount of products/services, so demand for worker hours has remained roughly fixed (if you factor in population increases) while production has been increasing. Who's been getting the benefit of that increased production? Not your median household, which is the whole crux of the problem.
I know of no definition of "infrastructure" that hinges on whether it is publicly owned. The Department of Homeland Security plans for "critical infrastructure security" and it acknowledges that most "critical infrastructure" is privately owned.

https://www.dhs.gov/what-critical-infrastructure
That's what a "false positive" is but Wikipedia also has a separate article on "false positive rate", which gives the formula

FP / (FP + TN)

Where FP is number of false positives, and TN is number of true negatives. So it's a third option:

- Out of 1000 actually negative samples, 50 were tested as positive.

So in the case of 1000 samples, 949 correctly testing as negative, 50 incorrectly testing as positive, and 1 correctly testing as positive, the false positive rate is 50 / 999.
I believe you have misinterpreted my post.
AlphaGo does do a tree search as you say, but the "value" of the stopping node is half the neural network you mention, and another half performing Monte Carlo with medium strength 'players' (2d amateur). These 'players' are really a quick version of the priority network that figures out which moves to play in the first place.
Fluid Dynamics Used to Show How Long It Would Take a Vampire to Drain Your Blood
I've never had a single cord fray on me before it was time to replace whatever it plugged in to, except for every single Apple cord I've ever had. What are some good alternatives? I'm tired of replacing the electrical tape on my MBPr charger brick.
What the hell did I just read?
Cydonia demo
Typo on Original Assignee? "Correlated Megnetics Research, Llc."
> The authors claim that spending inequality is the correct measure, but then provide zero research-based justification for this decision.

I think it's self-evident, since they include bequests in total lifetime spending: spending is how much one actually gets to enjoy one's wealth.

> Well, that's a fine presumption, but perhaps we're more concerned by the increasingly capability of the top 0.1% of the wealth of this country (ie, the vast majority of it, as much as 80-90%) to buy our political process and start us down a feedback loop of no return.

When most of the top ten political spenders are unions, I don't think it's the wealthy who are buying the political process; if anything they are buying it back.
Quality of output is definitely a problem for counterfeit.
Also from the other page "The standards are somewhat incomprehensible, but roughly 4mm of distance is required between the two circuits." However likes like even counterfeit maintains that distance.
Even products sold "by Amazon" can be counterfeit. Amazon lets 3rd party sellers ship their product to the fulfillment centers to be shipped out by Amazon, and if multiple sellers are selling the same item then it can all get bundled together in the same bin.
Can do you one better.. bypass Sophos AV in a single byte..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4xEzqISAmKI
> The basic assumption--that "spending power" is more important than "wealth" or "income"--is questionable, but the authors don't really spend any time defending it.

Do they need to? Spending power which includes the estate one leaves one's heirs represents one's total quality of life (measured in money, anyway).
> What makes this teardown so dangerous inside?

There's an entire section called "What's wrong with this charger".

> And why would someone make a counterfeit teardown... mostly to get notoriety?

Why not?
Very cool, but I'm not sure if "the Human OS" is the right metaphor here. This seems to be more about human hardware - the OS would be what goes on in our minds, what makes sense of the world, what regulates the way we live. Maybe that would be a task for philosophers.
Are there any MagSafe Chargers that are save and sold at a reasonable price (or have a better durability then apple's)?
If you're prepared to toss ethics overboard it's not that hard to come up with significant, relevant and valid results. The whole trick is to get those results while acting ethical.
Lots of hate here so far. I agree more explanation of their premise would go a long way towards convincing skeptics. However, I think this is an interesting perspective and deserves better conversation. Fiscal policy is progressive and has a dramatic impact on individual finances. Contrary to popular belief not everyone in the 1% pays the capital gains rate.
Chinese fake capacitors

http://i.imgur.com/k5i5EXW.jpg

The scam was so successful it even ended up in a college EE textbook

http://i.imgur.com/MUjlvAc.jpg (the author thought it was a normal type of capacitor.)

See moar outstanding Chinese counterfeit products here

https://www.zhihu.com/question/37915231

The site (zhihu.com) itself is a copycat of Quora.
The interactive visualization is very neat. Interesting data, and an interesting way of presenting the data.
The latter ratio is called precision. There is a handy table at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall#Probabili...
I am pretty sure the title of this submission is against the site guidelines; it's not the title of the article submitted and the article's title is perfectly explanatory.
Conscientiousness?
This was originally posted as a link to the Smarter Every Day video a few hours ago. Policies...
Also, most emulators of reasonably modern systems. Although JITs in VMs are a few orders of magnitude more common.
Speaking about scripting, look at the Vagrant cluster scripts. A lot of bash [0] (I like bash). But there have been so many issues. I've been using K8s for so long and I tried so long to help vagrant work, but it sucks. Anyways, went to use GCE and GKE instead and have never looked back since. Yes it does suck conceptually to rely on remote GCE for repo development but it is so seamless and I spend less time wrestling and waiting for booting clusters in VMs locally.

[0] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/tree/master/cluster...
The tech isn't novel, it's the application that is. You could mass produce this today.
I haven't ascended (came close years ago, but life happened and I wasn't able to make another run with things still fresh in my mind), but to answer your question: trial & error, passing familiarity with mythology / fantasy tropes, copious notes and patience.