skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Exactly, or better yet just use a saas ecommerce / blog /cms software package which gives you a lot of customizability without any programming like wordpress, wix, etc.
Is it even safe to discuss where you store your keys and how you protect them? That's halfway into a social engineering step, and sure, that's a bit of 'security by obscurity' but if I asked you where do you keep the spare keys to your house would you be comfortable answering that if you were identifiable?
There will be Netflix on Mars
Doesn't help that when it comes to Libertarians, some of them are Irish.

~"If two libertarians ever find themselves in agreement on a particular issue, they know that one of them has sold out."
First game, AlphaGo looked ambiguously weak until end of mid-game when it suddenly looked very strong.

Second game, AlphaGo looked obviously strong throughout.

So the probabilities are maybe not entirely wrong.

For reference I am 4k rating, somewhat below darkforest(1d amateur) and so very very far from 9dan pros that AlphaGo is beating. Usually, pro matches are hard to understand but the excellent commentary and abundant community analysis helps greatly.
They all successfully transitioned into industrial factory jobs, where they received living wages and benefits and weren't at all abused by the factory owners and lived happily ever after? I honestly don't know. This is where that history repeating itself quote comes into play.

EDIT to say I was being facetious.
It's true that humans should be allowed a rematch. And all professionals Go players could be playing in concert.

Hell, Google should organize a "AlphaGo against the world" on internet.
No Misc-Fixed in the list? That's what first comes to mind when I think of a "nerd font":

https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs-fonts.html
Having recently done invisalign, I think this is brilliant, but I would have had a really hard time sticking with it through the pain. I would worry too much that I was doing damage. My case was quite a bit more severe, however, so maybe it's less of a big deal if the movements are minor.
Agree we definitely need a stack that integrates all the best of breed tools for this stuff. There's some good boilerplates out there, which almost gets there, but it's not quite the same. I've considered building one. I think it would be especially interesting if it supported server side rendering out of the box and tightly integrated with aws lambda, aws api gateway, and the serverless framework.
as I watched the trailer I was thinking, gotta download this NOW. and then had this dreadful foresight of being glued to the simulator trying to squeeze out marginal productivity gains while my family says goodnight. life ending.
Extrapolating Deep Blue's 11GFLOPs supercomputer to today with Moore's law would be equivalent to a 70TFLOPs cluster. AlphaGo is using 1+PFLOPs of compute. While they likely aren't actually achieving that compute throughput, to put this in perspective this is the compute scale used to model huge geophysics simulations covering a 800km x 400km x 100km volume with 8+ billion grid points around the San Andreas.

At the very least, it's interesting to see how much more accessible computation has become. Back when I was in school I could only dream of having a cluster of 280 GPUs. When sometimes the dream would come true and you had access to a cluster you would have to wait your turn in the job queue and hope you had enough compute in our resource quota to prevent your job from being terminated.

Now I could spin up a 280 GPU cluster on AWS (after dealing with pesky utilization limits) for only $182/hour. If researchers at Google have been doing this non stop for the past year they have "racked up" $1.6M on just compute. This is a drop in the bucket for a marketing department and the publicity they have achieved. I don't think normal Go AI developers have access to those resources :)
If you're not comfortable answering that, perhaps it's a sign that you should be keeping them somewhere more secure.
Your comment is exactly the sort that would fit in well on reddit, but sticks out like a sore thumb on HN. Why? Well, because after taking the 40 seconds to read your entire message, I realized that it was nothing but sarcasm through and through.

In short, you added nothing to the discussion, apart from disrespecting the participants (which is what 100% sarcasm is).
There has been some interesting work published recently on "resugaring" that you might be interested in:

http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/pk-res...

and more recently:

http://cs.brown.edu/~sk/Publications/Papers/Published/pk-hyg...
I don't agree with that. It could be as secure as could be, but I'd still be pointing at the keys and that's information that no outsider needs to have. Why give that up?
It saves them from having to look for the keys, they can now set up a targeted attack on obtaining the keys because their location is already known and that's half the battle.
If you like it a lot, let's make sure we credit Michael Redmond who said it last night during the Go match: https://youtu.be/qUAmTYHEyM8?t=3713
What happens is that in order to request a lyft, you'll put in your destination and if a bunch of people put in a similar destination, the option will pop up to take an auto-scheduled van/minibus.

Also, lyft will download the Giants schedule.
WHAM, BAM, TANTAN
I think you mean 500K$ usd, used.
The fact that his retort is sarcastic, does not mean that he does not have a point. His point is that someone will be subsidizing his existence, and pointing out that nobody would want to do it, if they were faced with that reality, directly.
Of course it is in the way - it is meant to replace safety nets, and those exist in part for the employed with poor money management skills. If you change the source of income but do not solve the problem of people not budgeting their income well, it solves nothing and you lose a lot of the potential savings from UBI.
The two best ones I know of are:

https://github.com/davezuko/react-redux-starter-kit
and
https://github.com/erikras/react-redux-universal-hot-example
<Adding an extra button just means they will now use both buttons to disagree.>

This.
Yes, but the (enterprisey) fear to contribute on a(n) (A)GPL licensed repo still stands, looking at how many PRs have MIT/Apache licensed projects makes you feel that the less open licenses aren't as bad as Stallman says, because they encourage enterprise users (and developers that are being paid for it) to contribute back to those projects anyway
I've been saying for a while now that "self-driving" is the 2016 equivalent of flying cars.

It's not that I think the technology won't happen -- it's clearly on the way -- I just think it's far more likely to happen as incremental advancements to existing auto technology (e.g. "lane assist", "self parking", etc.), while all of the various regulatory and societal problems sort themselves out. It's already becoming clear that the major automakers are deploying bits and pieces of self-driving tech faster than Google is getting to the glorious, all-robot future.

When you stop to think about all of the things that would have to change in our society to make a "sudden" transition to robot cars (of which the unemployment of a huge number of people is just one factor), it seems wildly implausible, even on a ten-year timeframe. We'll probably go through decades of refinement and expansion of car automation features before the first truly driverless cars roll off the assembly line.
That works great until you realize that other people often have different value systems. What you're super proud of may be deeply offensive to another person. Just think about how saying "I'm a Googler, and proud of the work I do" might go over for a CS student vs. how it goes ever for the journalist who's struggling to make a living because Google has commoditized the news business.

In practice, what usually happens is people end up self-organizing into small communities of like-minded people. Within the community, values are very homogenous, and people can feel safe that they have a good pulse on what will be offensive vs. what won't be. But when one community meets another, they're often shocked at how barbaric the rest of humanity can be. (Just look at the Trump vs. Sanders melee that played out in Chicago last night.)

And the more differentiated and more nuanced someone's views are, the less they fit into any one community. There are plenty of people whose personal relationships are entirely personal because they're at the point where no one group is going to give them that feeling of belonging.
German pilot traces an outline of plane with flight path
On the other hand, the first couple sections here seem almost like a direct takedown of the New Yorker article:

http://www.bloombergview.com/articles/2016-03-11/passive-inv...

Maybe his views have solidified in favor of passive investing.

Either way though, balanced or skeptical, I trust Levine.
> strongest products ever made were high-assurance closed source

Because we never found the backdoors put in place by the developers does not mean they were not there, and without source access we have absolutely no reason to believe anyone when they say there are none.
I think any app requiring multiple user seeing the same screens could benefit from them. Compare an open websocket versus polling every 30 seconds for the use case of changes made by other users of your system. Instant notifications and changes of your ui in real time versus a delay that could lead to users trying to perform operations on outdated state.
Ultimately, just the breakdown of the price and convenience for each individual person.

What's interesting though, if auto-cars really end up easily affordable and accident free - and maybe tech industry lobbying encouraging.. Imagine a future where human driven cars are forbidden!
Thanks for the suggestion. Like you mentioned though getting to the end of 1300 pages will take ages. Hope I can find that sort of time.
The problem is that the myths that sell aren't the ones we should identify with.
This author shows little knowledge of how the stock market actually works:

> A market with more passive investors than active ones will continue to push money into the largest firms, whether these companies are actually performing strongly or not.

When I buy an index fund holding the S&P 500, none of those businesses get my money, My money does not go into any of them. I have bought an already existing asset from another person who is selling it.
I'm a remote developer planning to work from campgrounds and mountains with a quasi standing desk that can be attached to a tree. I'm thinking about putting up a blog to track the experience and all the research I have done.
I sympathize with those who feel that explaining there views to people who don't know a lot about the topic is a waste of time. But if you decide that for a given topic, don't go to a forum and make claims! If you make claims, be prepared to back them up; if you aren't prepared, refrain from making claims.

An exception is if you have authority that will shift people's beliefs even without backup.

Another exception can be if you merely post links, and don't endorse any statements beyond that link. Then you're performing the service of providing more information, and any problems can be taken up with the original author.

But making claims and refusing to back them up or clarify on account of trollphobia is borderline troll itself.
Couldn't agree more. Having a central data model is so important to scaling an application to many engineers versus the alternative of state being all over the place or even worse stored in the dom, and also opens up some really simple ways to implement quite advanced functionality.
Didn't seem too far away 30 years ago either.

While extremely impressive, AlphaGo is still a one-trick pony. We won't be coppertops for a while, yet.

But what does a future look like for humans when we're no longer needed? As it has always been, that depends largely on the compassion of those humans with great wealth and power.

Good thing there aren't flying weapons to worry about. Oh wait...
I'm also weirded out. Who wants to work? How can you not have as a life goal to not work? It sucks for the most part!

As for Marx and Keynes and others, thinking about what people will do if they're freed of labour, have you SEEN youtube? People are not lacking ideas on things to do, quite the opposite!
Microsoft hits new low – sneaks Win 10 ads into IE security patch
The poor are incapable of rising above their current conditions?
Painfully Honest Job Descriptions for Portland Women in Tech
I currently have a TD-W8960N that's been running 24/7 for about 3 years. Only a couple of outages which were due to ISP issues. Ventilation is nothing special, its just sitting on a shelf. No UPS, but the power board its plugged into does have some limited amount of power spike filtering I believe. Cable length from modem to phone socket on wall is less than 50cm. It shares the socket with an ADSL2+ line filter splitter and a standard telephone. Got about 10 WiFi devices in the house sharing access.
Exactly how I feel. Now let the hating continue.
Yes, not knowing where to even start the attack does make it more difficult to complete an attack. But, there is no way it could make it easier. I mean adding plastic wrap around your safe does technically make it more difficult to break into, but the issue comes where you come to rely on it. My safe is 100% uncrackable, as long as it doesn't get wet, thanks plastic wrap.
a potential theory is he paid her the money to not tell his wife/kids who knew nothing of the affair, obviously extremely ill advised but plausible
> Never have the good been so much more powerful than the bad.

How incredibly clueless.

Really, what prompts you to post these things? The US could not even hold down a bunch of insurgents in a country that a tin-pot dictator managed to stabilize, gave us - directly or indirectly - Al Quada, IS and a whole bunch of other instability besides.

Ask the Swiss how much they need American defenses. Russia would - and could - wipe out Poland, the Ukraine and a large chunk of Romania in a couple of days if they set their mind to it, fortunately even Putin realizes the economic backlash from that will be the end of his reign.

In case you didn't get the message: the world balance of power is held through ever stronger economic ties, not by weapons or dumb saber rattling. What hurts the party that you'd name your enemy hurts you too.

There is a good reason why NK and Iran are just the way they are in spite of being the subject of much rhetoric: a war would not end well for either side, economically those countries are not the most important (though, arguably, Iran has some resources the US covets) but from the point of view of manpower and gear they would do a lot of damage to anybody stupid enough to invade. Think Iraq but much much worse.

The annexation of Ukraine into the EU/Nato is what drove Russia to take action.

If it had been left to sit the way it had for the last 20 years or so everything would be unchanged because it was not a threat.

Cowboy politics and games don't go well with the role of a country that 'keeps the peace and keeps the trade routes open' (as far as that's correct anyway, most times it's not the peace that's being kept).

Greetings from one of those infantilized Europeans.
Indeed it seems designed specifically for short range, so it may not be possible. http://mwrf.com/systems/extend-active-rfid-zigbee-network

Do you have a photo? I have a Boston Terrier and so they are salient to me (rarities in the Bay Area, everyone seems to have a doodle).
> With religion absent in many people's lives, not much has stepped in to take up the slack

Given the obsession with hard (in fact over-) work in the English-speaking world and European north tends to be commonly treated as an artifact of the "Protestant work ethic" this seems pretty off-base.
Try again:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Depression
At a primary level, you are correct. But the effects of passive investment are more subtle.
1. More investment dollars chasing big companies allows those companies to issue more stock without having to worry about pushing prices down (since there is this extra upward pressure of increased flow.)
2. Increased stock prices from increased flow gives the company more stock value for acquisitions
3. If money keeps flowing into particular stocks, it encourages companies to be lax about dividend growth, since the prices rise regardless.
I would think this has to be a serious inflection point... As far learning how to think, strategize, competing with friends, etc go will remain. However for the extremely few say 100 really top level players, this has to in a way be disheartening... at that level its about competition, and the will, discipline and ability to advance... it has to be disheartening to know you will never be the best.

Its kind of like climbing mount Everest 'because it was there'. Its just not 'there' anymore.
I find it difficult to call any system with >1billion market cap "dead". Maybe "soon to die", but it can't be called dead until it's no longer valuable, IMO.
It's a mixed bag. The US is part of the solution but also part of the problem.
That's not the question though. The question is 'where do you keep the key to your safe'?
This is the most important question society must face in the next 10-20 years and NOBODY is talking about it. Not a good start...
With high-frequency and algorithmic market-makers, there is no such thing as low liquidity. Bid-ask spreads are at all-time lows as algo market makers try to one-up each other to squeeze spreads and provide liquidity.
Some (small) number of humans will own the capital and resources on which the AI run, in turn shackling and exploiting the remainder of the human race.

The remainder of the rest of the human race will be in full support of this state of affairs, as some (small) portion of the AI will be charged with public opinion manipulation and securing/hiding the resources of the small portion of humans mentioned above.

If you want to see the future, imagine a golden Iphone, "Siri, stamp on this poor person's face", forever.
I think that's one way to flash out my sketch a bit more. Yes. Basically, in effect you'd be folding Unemployment Insurance into the system.
Not with that attitude!

Contact your representatives, tell them how you feel. Share information with your friends and coworkers. The public wants data security. On balance, backdoors will make us less secure. A few representatives like Lindsey Graham have already changed their minds when presented with new information. [1]

[1] https://youtu.be/uk4hYAwCdhU?t=1m44s
HFT don't care about the value of a stock in the longer run, they just try to make a market between buyers and sellers.
With Lenovo's security record, I don't think 'sincere' is the best adjective to describe their users.
Capitalism without capitalists, only rent seekers.
Are you suggesting google doesn't employ people with guns?
Are you suggesting google and the government are fundamentally separate entities? Are you suggesting the government does not have access to everything google has access to? And are you suggesting non-governmental agencies can't employ physical force? Like the groups of violent criminals used to destroy the pro-union movement many years ago or organized crime organizations to name a few examples? Are you suggesting if Google doesn't like someone it cannot outsource the violence to other organizations like the FBI by reporting appropriately? Are you suggesting all kinds of force are irrelevant compared to the most clumsy and inconsequential and most unimportant type of force used in our part of the world, physical force?

Because any of those suggestions, all of which you seem to imply by your statement I would take issue with. The last being the most important.

The platitudes suggesting anything a corporation does, no matter how powerful, is okay since it can't employ physical force, while anything the government does is wrong because it can are excellent fodder to trick children into accepting Libertarianism but are otherwise mostly ineffective.
You can link keys to hostnames (with pattern matching too!) in ~/.ssh/config.
The Comic and the Ping-Pong Champ
I use ssh-ident. It creates a separate ssh agent for each identity you use and you can setup a different identity for each host or ssh argument. And if worse comes to worse, it will prevent someone running off with all the keys you are currently using because instead they only have access to that one agent, not all your agents.

The downsides (besides possible security implications of trusting someone else's code to manage your keys) is that tools like rsync and scp won't work straight out of the box. You have to either alias ssh to ssh-ident, or provide the path to ssh-ident yourself.

https://github.com/ccontavalli/ssh-ident
Salesforce OpenSources Argus – Time Series Monitoring and Alerting
Another option....have a dentist bind composite material to the couple teeth out of alignment.

Had two teeth done for under $500 10 years ago.

It's a stop gap until braces are an option financially.
Just the same. It's probably not perfectly secure but it beats having them on an encrypted dropbox directory which was my previous setup.
>This will sound moralistic, and I don't mean it that way

It's truly sad that the culture of people in computing reading this forum, which reflects the nation and west as a whole, is so disconnected from God that you feel the need to disclaim the profession of morality or religion.
OK. Sandisk SDs should support TRIM (provided the SD controller supports it too) so you could keep their performance up over the time.

I can confirm that Sandisk's 64GB microSD extreme pro is TRIMable on a raspberry pi.
> "Of all things, hard work has become a virtue instead of the curse it was always advertised to be by our remote ancestors... The necessity to work is a neurotic symptom. It is a crutch. It is an attempt to make oneself feel valuable even though there is no particular need for one’s working."

— C. B. Chisholm
You can do what we did in my team: decide on a style of testing and stick to it (in our case, I liked WordSpec). With JUnit you can't do this, because there is only one style.

I particularly liked the "should", "must", "where", etc. DSL. If I remember correctly, this style of testing comes from the Rails community. I guess it's a matter of taste, but I would definitely recommend it to newbies.
True, but this is a part of the issue that can be raised separately from what Obama and the DOJ are talking about.

I think we really should stay focused on the legal battle. If the government brings up federal level legislation mandating backdoors in IT companies' products, we're going to need a very educated public to understand how encryption works and what's really at stake. Right now, our head of state is spreading FUD that he believes to be accurate and we know is false. This must be corrected if we are to maintain public safety, and secondarily, a growing economy.
I utterly loathe using em units. Rem is better, but px are nice and locked down. Em's are neat in theory, but reasoning about them after the CSS has solidified is so tedious.

Em units begin to feel like a weather app telling you today's forecast as a multiplier of yesterday's temperature.

Today is going to be 1.1!

[uninstall]
It could be because of the immediate negative publicity complaints on social media get.

Irate customer complains via Twitter, @ mentions Dell => a bunch of people see it.

Irate customer complains via a private communication channel => others are much less likely to notice/find out.