skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
The All-in cost is why it's not cost effective if you're not using it for an enormous step-up in responsibility or change in field.

For someone looking to marginally improve their standing, it doesn't help. A 30 year old director who wants to be in the same company isn't improved. Or should go to an exec program on the company dollar.

But there is no better way to get into strategy consulting or investment banking if you're not there already. And if you have a soft undergrad that isn't taken seriously, the right top 6-8 MBA will.

To your point - there are many cheaper, faster and more effective ways to accomplish most of the goals if you're already successful. (Except for learning Accounting - it's impossible to learn unless a school is forcing you and giving you exams. It's just too boring otherwise.)
Chomsky's analysis is the same as the NYTimes--that Trump appeals primarily to poor and uneducated voters, and that he has the same magnetism as Hitler. Too much ivory tower intellectualization.
I'm definitely intrigued. We've used everything under the sun and always end up falling back to Asana (we're a small design agency).

Looking forward to trying this out!

Edit: You guys might want to be a bit more clear that you're requiring a credit card to signup for beta access, even if you're not charging for 30 days.
> Are screen readers difficult to use? Sure, but no more so than typical desktop environments.

That's a very low bar. Expert computer users like you and me have no problem with a screen that has even thousands of pieces of information on it. We use contextual cues to help us navigate that space, relying on good information design. But most people find current computers overly complicated. I think one of the reasons smartphones have eclipsed PCs is that the 4 inch screen forces you to cut down to a more human scale of choice complexity.

But that's why I am finding myself agreeing with OP that conversational interfaces are the future, for the same reason. They will force us to design down even further, into a one-dimensional UI. Choice, choice, choice, choice, etc.

That UI will be a slight simplification on the current phone UIs, and of course multiple threads can be shown on the screen at once to allow better use of screen real-estate for those who need it. Essentially, you just add lots of these one-dimensional UIs to the screen and multi-task. But the capital-T Truth is that even without a screen reader, using a Desktop computer and indeed vision itself is a largely linear process. Experts get fast at it, but we still must scan about to discover new information and places to interact. I think we will be surprised how much of our computational life actually becomes conversational.

One of the most exciting things to me about conversational interfaces is that writing automation software that uses them is much more trivial than writing automation software for a big complex GUI. And building AIs that live in them is also easier.

In general, I think there is something very important in the space of UI for beginners, mobile users, AIs, and people with disabilities that is happening. A kind of crystalization of intent. I'm only hearing people like OP start to talk about it now, but I actually think this is the next big wave in UI. And I do agree with you that most time spent improving UIs is wasted in exactly the way you describe.
I think I answered that in the clearest way I (personally) could, right in the comment to which you replied.
Agreed. A landing page merely asking for email addresses without even a screenshot/video/anything is not "showing" anything.
You don't get a say over my lifestyle. My life is made up of my choices, and you get 0% say over what I do with it, unless my actions directly affect you.

If I want to smoke a little pot on the weekends, I am going to do it. If you have a problem with it, I don't care, because you're not invited to my smokeout.

You are treading a dangerous line trying to write lifestyles into law. That's the same school of thought that people that oppose homosexuality and premarital sex use to to justify their unfair restrictions.
What breaks my heart about this "cold war" becoming a "hot war" is it will probably stifle school age curriculum. If its a hot button political issue then teachers won't be encouraging little johnny and suzie to show the class their nifty secret code they made on the playground. We'll hear a lot of bloviating on how every child should learn to code, but if you point out the creative minds of children are fertile ground for exploring steganography you'll get a resounding laugh and a joke about stegasaurus.
Kurumsal SEO? – Kurumsal Seo Hizmetleri
Yes, 2002 was the last year. Prof. Dave Hanscom ran the HSCI from 1990 to 2002 [1].

I checked the Wayback Machine (archive.org), but unfortunately it doesn't have those pages mirrored. It's very sad that this history seems to be getting lost. At least one prestigious alumni (HSCI '92) that of I'm aware of is Berkeley Prof. Alexei Efros [2].

Awesome model! It's definitely one of the best ones I've seen from that program.

[1] http://www.cs.utah.edu/~hanscom/

[2] http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~efros/
Headline: “Revised bill adds privacy safeguards.”  Govt changed one header
Correct. It is a landing page test. I won't deny that, but I'm also not going to build a product before I know whether it's something people want.

Good feedback on the value prop. I will make that clearer.
If you have the money, you can always rent antenna space on a nearby office building and get commercial-grade internet in that building hooked up to a 5ghz link going to your house. E.g. ubiquiti nanobridge (30 km LoS range) is only $200 for a pair.
USPS considering virtual PO box
Kurumsal Seo
The government isn't a single person. There are conflicting interests.
Trump – The Least Charitable Billionaire (2011)
Show HN: IRC Webhook Notifications Using API Gateway and Lambda
Displaced Florida Disney Worker Details Humiliation of Training Replacements
Another concern, this is going to be saved to the browser's history, and thus to the HDD.
Is this is pinnacle of vapid blog spam headlines?
Location: Washington, DC/Nova

Remote: Partial

Willing to relocate: No

Technologies: C++ (w/boost), python, linux, AMQP, MySQL

Resume: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B3xTtjze6ftUdlBST2hUZkNHdF...

Github: https://www.github.com/sfpiano

LinkedIn: www.linkedin.com/in/sfiorell

Email: sfpiano (google mail)
I couldn't find the pricing page. It is nice that you offer a 14-day free trial, but, wouldn't a potential user want to know how much it would cost beyond that?
Well there goes my theory.

On the other side, I see Bernie losing heavily in conservative states, but nearly equal or slightly better in others. I'm assuming he's so polarizing that republican voters are voting against him. This may be a good system for Americans in general even if I'd love to see him win (it keeps candidates towards the middle).
I'm not sure what you are taking issue with.

Criteo recently agreed to pay Eyeo 30% of revenue from ads that are allowed through. As a public company, they disclosed this to certain analysts and investors who follow them. Almost all Criteo ads are now whitelisted by ABP. >90% of ABP users keep the default settings, so that argument is a red herring in my mind. Of course, Criteo is not just showing you ads, but tracking you around the web also, in order to facilitate showing you the right ads...so the tracking domains have all been whitelisted as well.

At what point does ABP quit being an ad blocker because so many ads get through? If you don't like ads, you should switch to another adblock client. If you don't mind ads, you should just uninstall whatever you've got so that the publishers (and not yet another middleman) reap the rewards.
You can set up a free trial (no credit card required) to get a sandbox where you can interact with the application!
Congratulations on the product. I will suggest this to my colleagues at work. We're currently using Google Docs to share/work on knowledge and we're not happy with it. Although Google Docs style comments would be nice to have in the future.

Unfortunately your "Try it now for free" button doesn't seem to resolve at the moment.

I saw that you are supported by UnternehmerTUM and would be interested to hear about your experience. I am studying at LMU and I am currently in the process of starting my own gig.
Especially the Techfounders program sparked my interest.

If you want to, you can also E-Mail me. My address can be found in my profile.
There ist std::atomic in recent C++ flavors
Agree, isn't the difference between method #1 and method #2 precisely the reason that Bundler has a distinction between Gemfile and Gemfile.lock? http://bundler.io/v1.3/rationale.html Programmers want to handle and edit method #1, but sane deployment or collaboration requires tracking resolved versions via method #2.

The Gemfile contains the top-level dependencies that the app needs; the Gemfile.lock ensures that everybody developing or deploying is using the same gem versions for top-level and resolved transitive dependencies. Periodically one can `bundle update` to upgrade gem versions: http://bundler.io/man/bundle-update.1.html

It does continue to surprise me that distinctions like these are not handled by Python tooling, which has this absolutely sordid history around packaging, which continues aplomb in the wheel vs. egg wars... http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2014/1/27/python-on-wheels/
Pricing is on the homepage -apologies for not copying to our Boss overview:

https://www.staffjoy.com
Answer me this: Have you ever consumed an alcoholic beverage? Have you ever consumed alcohol to the point of intoxication?

Well, if you answered yes, then you used a mind-altering substance / external chemical influence for your personal enjoyment. Don't you deserve jail for this? I mean, shouldn't you have been able resist the urge to intoxicate yourself, and instead pushed yourself in the "right direction" of sobriety? Since you failed at this, we might as well throw the book at you for it, right?

Alternately, if you answered "no" to my above question(s), then you're a liar and you can see yourself out.
You can't write comments on HN that:

* Attempt to synthesize negative things out of people's comment histories to club them with on current threads

* Directly accuse commenters of lying

* Imply that comments are being written in bad faith or as shills.

Your comment manages to do all three. Please don't write comments like this here.
You have to provide the app a picture of yourself when setting it up, so I don't believe it's tied in with any other system within Google. As well, I believe stores are doing a mix of either camera or using name/initials to verify who you are (depends on the store you go into).

The opinions stated here are my own, not necessarily those of Google.
This thing is incredibly popular in my country. I've started looking at smart watches half a month ago on the most popular online shopping service in my country, and most of the results I got were exactly this one (judging from the screenshot, since most of those selling it don't include no brand info, no model info, no OS info).
I definitely agree with you that the last thing I would want readers to take away from this article, is that they don't have to worry about accessibility or universal design. Until we have better tools, we should be providing the best possible experience with the tools we do have.

I also agree that we shouldn't be creating separate experiences for the blind. I think it's generally acknowledged that they end up being worse than a combined interface, never getting the resources or new features that experiences for sighted users get.

Where we seem to disagree is on the roll that screen readers play in limiting the usability of technology. On the one hand they are amazing because they provide access to technology that would otherwise not exist. On the other hand, by virtue of the way they function-mapping a 2 dimensional visual experience into a one dimensional stream of audio-using a screen reader can only be so efficient.

This lack of usability puts access to technology beyond the reach of many who are less tech savvy than you or I, and given that the vast majority of people losing their vision in the US are the elderly, there are a lot of people who fall into that category. What's worse, the rate of vision loss is set to double as baby-boomer's age out.

I totally agree that the medical-model of Accessibility sucks, but I think Screen Readers fall into that category. They seek to adapt an experience designed for others to the needs of the disabled. Conversational interfaces have the potential to create a consumer quality experience, that by it's very nature is accessible (at least to the blind).
And accessible by default is the best possible outcome.
Polymer isn't as tapped into the current JS trends as React, and isn't as established as React or Angular, and it's been somewhat hampered by skepticism of the web components standards.

I believe Polymer is actually out ahead in terms of it's technology and philosophy in many ways. With native Shadow DOM and Custom Elements support coming to a majority of browsers this year, I think the skepticism will subside, more people will realize the benefits and Polymer will get more and more press.
Apple's UX has been pretty impressive, although I've never tried to use it full-time. http://www.phonearena.com/news/Blind-man-demonstrates-the-ef... http://www.siriuserguide.com/siri-dictation-guide/ You can either dictate an email, or record a "voice memo" and email the sound. http://www.cnet.com/how-to/voice-dictation-is-now-done-in-re...
From the guidelines[0]:

> Show HN is for something you've made that other people can play with. HN users can try it out, give you feedback, and ask questions in the thread.

> If your work isn't ready for people to try out yet, please don't do a Show HN. Once it's ready, come back and do it then.

> ...sign-up pages...can't be tried out, so they can't be Show HNs.

I suggest you actually build out the application and resubmit then, or find another traffic source with which to validate the idea.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html
There is a difference between free (gratis) and free (libre).

It is possible to make money by giving things away, but such strategies are much more fragile when the giveaway item is libre. If you piss off your "customers"--or even just fail to please them enough--someone may just fork your free item and bleed away your audience.

Facebook is gratis, and not easily replicated. Therefore it can engage in far more objectionable behavior in monetizing its user base than AdBlock Plus, which is libre. If ABP sells out its users, the users just uninstall it and put uBlock Origin in its place. Or they download the source, cut out the part that causes offense, and re-release it as AdBlock Minus.
I speak about what I know. I don't speak about things I don't know, or when there are more knowledgeable people around.

Given that I've been in the industry for five years, and I hear a lot of regurgitated nonsense, that's when I speak up.

But there's a bunch of people who already have opinions that everything about HFT is dishonest, so be it. Sure, I'm lying about everything.
Does anyone know if bashscript could be updated to allow spaces between assignment? I can't see how it would break existing programs (but I'm sure there's a catch) and scripts would be much cleaner (and less of an headache).
Slack voice calling arrives on desktop
React is a silo. Web components are just DOM and very interoperable. This will be the big difference maker in the coming years.
Well, I'm one of the few folks verifying copyright on a global scale (software originality to be more exact) and the HQ is based in EU, so the context is familiar to me.

IMHO the most effective way is to place as much code as you can under AGPL terms. Either writing the code yourself and/or motivating others to write it with that license underneath.

The second most effective way is to join FSFE (attention to the "E" because it matters and stands for the European version of FSF).

To beat copyright in software you need to play the copyright rules by the book and then mold the waves of tech innovation so that defacto copyright enforcement becomes a moot point (all code free).

This is what has been in motion since the 90s. GPL was the ugly kid and "will never work" stuff, now it is in the pocket for large majority of population. Github is the group that went furthest in opposing copyright, by implicitly demotivating code contributors to explicitly license their code. But this backfired. For the same reason that you use Public Domain, unlicensed code has not (historically) grew to massive and infrastructure critical projects.

So. Need to license. Public Domain is OK but is too lenient. It does not fuel further Public Domain code. This is where AGPL shines. One might not like the fact that all code then needs to be under AGPL, but this is necessary to build motion and force others to open their hand from copyright monopolies.

Just food for thought. Can talk outside of HN if you wish, just drop a msg nuno.brito@triplecheck.de
From recent KrebsonSecurity article: This is Why People Fear the Internet of Things [1]

Replace "camera" with "watch":

“The details about how P2P feature works which will be helpful for you understand why the camera need communicate with P2P servers,” Qu explained. “Our company deploy many servers in some regions of global world.” Qu further explained:

1. When the camera is powered on and connected to the internet, the camera will log in our main P2P server with fastest response and get the IP address of other server with low load and log in it. Then the camera will not connect the main P2P server.

2. When log in the camera via P2P with Foscam App, the app will also log in our main P2P server with fastest response and get the IP address of the server the camera connect to.

3. The App will ask the server create an independent tunnel between the app and the camera. The data and video will transfers directly between them and will not pass through the server. If the server fail to create the tunnel, the data and video will be forwarded by the server and all of them are encrypted.

4. Finally the camera will keep hearbeat connection with our P2P server in order to check the connection status with the servers so that the app can visit the camera directly via the server. Only when the camera power off/on or change another network, it will replicate the steps above.”

Nothing inherently malicious about this, unless the vendor is irresponsible with user data, or collects data it should not be collecting in the first place.

[1] http://krebsonsecurity.com/2016/02/this-is-why-people-fear-t...
Can you explain exactly how this is an instance of NYSE "systematically ripping off retail investors"? Please be as specific as you can.
Web Frameworks are Evil
Wait, that is still providing liquidity. Its just doing it at a different price, which is the rational thing to do in the face of a multi-level clear.

Why wouldn't the sudden appearance of a big buyer that wanted more liquidity at near levels than is available indicate the price should go up? That's supply and demand. Am I missing something about your argument?
The same reason a YCombinator company is worth anything. Nonzero probability of them doing something really valuable while the lights are on.
That's not as bad as I was thinking. It sounded like (and documents are sketchy) that this was some sort of shared SQLite db over their net. It sounded rife with potential problems and interesting injection issues. I've dealt with enough bad SQL statements and poor websites with injections and all. Poor bobby tables.

Now, I thought about how to handle a similar dynamic data issue with IPFS: We had Usenet years ago and it's still creaking along in a few places. What if we bring that tech back, to an IPFS era? I'd be eminently glad to get rid of 'forums', and go back to what we had prior.

The only piece that was missing is how we maintain all the different groups and posts. That's now solved by a blockchain containing the root pointing towards other 'chains, and then to posts themselves. I'm seeing it in my head how to construct this, but it could be relying on faulty understandings too :)
This title should be changed to just "Google Hands Free Payments". This is not a McDonalds-only system.
Once your legal team is making money off of talking with you about suing the pirate bay, if it's not technically stealing then at least it's clearly hypocrisy.
I agree. I use it on a daily basis. It has a lot of shortcomings, but I still find it more convenient to use than SourceTree. I'm not aware about any other sensible GUI clients for Windows.
The Advantages of Distributed Manufacturing
This is no worse a security footprint than the existing, requisite "Forgot Your Password" flow. It's the exact same security footprint.

TLS is already an under-spoken requisite of SMTP communications from any webserver doing "Forgot Your Password" workflows. TLS between mail servers is also already a de facto SMTP requirement for most bare minimum spam fighting mechanisms.
There is another passwordless system called SQRL which is automated and more secure. From the user's perspective, they scan a QR code or click a browser extension and are signed into the site. Behind the scenes, a cryptographic challenge (a response URL + nonce) is presented to the user's phone or browser extension. The client signs the challenge using a per-site private key and sends the result to the provided URL.

https://www.grc.com/sqrl/sqrl.htm
All public exchanges are required to have public approval for all of their order types and you can look up how they behave at any time.
What is this the 1990's? Of course kids should use tech. Think of how far behind their piers they would be without a smartphone.
I like the idea, but doesn't it come with a few security concerns? One blaring issue is that email is sent in plain text, so anyone can intercept it and log in as you.

I was originally going to complain that anyone who has access to your email now has access to all of your accounts, but upon further thought I don't know how much of a concern this really. First, the vast majority of people use the same password everywhere anyways. Second, most services use your email to reset your password anyways. The only security difference I can think of is if someone uses your email for a password reset and changes your password, it becomes very obvious there might have been a security issue when you try to log in and your password doesn't work. If all someone has to do is follow the link, there's nothing to create that suspicion.

A few other things to consider:
- How long does the token emailed to you last for?

- If I send a new token, do previous sessions expire?
---- If so, how can I be logged in via multiple browsers/computers?
---- If not, does an attacker have permanent access to my account if they got access to a single link?
IBM Open Blockchain
In the large, for most people, those assertions are true. It turns out that there's a wide gulf between "Can" and "do" that a fair risk assessment will, for many people, indicate is a useful place to be.

Entire companies are built and thrive in the gap between "can" and "do" on the Internet.
The benefit? People don't have their order front runned by algorithm which will sell it back to them at a slightly higher price, skimming money off the top to no one's benefit.
Which isn't focusing on military contracts any longer as part of their buy-out. Does no one actually read anything before they make comments like this?

Best link I could find on short notice: http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/185570-google-finally-pro...
Promoting the use of newer versions is a little nice, but you will rue the day you deploy to production and it automatically pulls some flaky new package version that you didn't have a chance to test locally.
Some years, I wrote something similar: https://github.com/otto-de/mongodb-profiler.