skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
You are wrong. Censoring [1] is exactly what I said, "the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds". He is being threatened to lose his job, this is suppression. You don't have to agree with him but one should be careful with 'fringe right wing' claims and who is or is not fit for a job.
[1] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/censoring
"profitable growth"?

:puzzled:
Checkout this Huge Tablet from Samsung 18.4 inches
This is also classic case of a society which does not trust individuals or let them mind their own business but needlessly interferes int their lives in the name of protecting them.
I get what you mean, but it's not as if you're reading it out. I'd say I read pretty fast: my eyes skim quickly across the page and I understand what is written there, but it's as if the voice in my head is reading it out to me at the same speed as I'm reading. It doesn't slow anything down.
That sentence caught my eye, too.

So they are publicly stating that they are not really interested in just solving the case and prosecuting the offender. Instead, they want to see what else they can stick to the man.

I'm sure if you just dig deep enough, you will find some crime in everyone's data. Guilty until proven innocent.
It would be fun to see the BSOD in my browser just for nostalgia.
We've already have internal discussions about whether it makes sense to make documentation part of our ticketing system (we use Pivotal Tracker). Everyone seems to agree that it's the only way the docs will ever get updated. 30% is a lot though!
There should be a free trial but limited to girls in the Niagara Falls area.
The whole thing reminds me of the r/sadcringe subreddit.
UberMoto launched in Thailand
Hearing an inner voice is not speaking. It is all in the head, not using the mouth. It skips over parts of words and is faster than a normal speaking voice would be.

> it's not like you look individually at every word and read them out, you see a larger area of text as a unit.

Of course you do. It is impossible to predict what will be the next word just by looking at one, if you don't look at each one you don't read, you skim. Meaning you won't understand anything.
Awesome, it works also on my Windows phone browser ( that is Internet Explorer :)
I have the internal voice while reading but I also read faster than almost everyone I know. The "voice" is disembodied and doesn't "sound" like anyone I know. It doesn't sound like VoiceOver at high speed, but the sensation is more like my brain is fast-forwarding time so the voice and the understanding of the words are happening at an accelerated rate. I recognize word shapes while reading but that doesn't seem to affect the voice. If the real sound of the word differs from what I thought it was when I first learned the word it is extremely difficult to change the internal voice and consequently how I pronounce the word.

My internal thoughts also seem to be expressed this way, though not necessarily all the time. Doubts or alternate viewpoints are often alternate voices and I can "hear" the arguments.
Robert Chao is what many of us dreamed we’d become when we first started engineering school. We loved technology. We knew we were intelligent. We wanted to build our skills and increase our knowledge. We wanted to apply that education along with our natural passion and talent to solve important problems. We craved that creative rush, that eureka moment when we realized we had a slightly better idea, an improvement, a challenge to the status quo. We wanted to change the world - one transistor at a time.

For most of us, Dr. Moore had other plans.

For the past four decades, Robert Chao has remained indifferent to the cataclysmic vortex of Moore’s Law. His first patent (4215281), filed in February 1978 on behalf of Supertex Semiconductor (of which he was a founder), was for a CMOS integrated circuit - a single-chip solution that provided the platform enabling the ubiquitous home smoke detector.

http://1tour.vn
http://en.1tour.vn
http://1tour.vn/khach-san
http://1tour.vn/tour
http://blog.1tour.vn
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/ha-noi
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/sapa/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/da-nang/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/da-lat/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/nha-trang/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/vung-tau/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/phan-thiet/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/sai-gon/
http://1tour.vn/khach-san/phu-quoc/
http://en.1tour.vn/accommodation/halong-bay-cruises-tours
http://en.1tour.vn/tour/hanoi/
http://en.1tour.vn/tour/sapa/
http://en.1tour.vn/tour/mekong-delta/
http://tourdulich123.com/
http://dongtaydulich.com/
http://datvemaybayi.com
http://monngon7.com
http://dulichasian.com/
http://travellvnn.com/
http://tourgiarenhat.com
http://vemaybayr.com
http://dulich3mienn.com
http://khachsan9.com/
http://cantho60s.com
http://raovatzoom.com
http://vnco.net
http://cachlamkem.vn
http://thoitrang365.net
http://autocar24.com
Best Fintech Events and Conferences in 2016
Use of acid and lasers to access data stored on iPhones
OA quote: ""lower league English football" wasn't available"

Possibly explains the recurring need for a fake one.

Serious contribution: bots faking it with other bots generating large numbers of apparently real social profiles. Not just gf/bf whatever but other forms of relationship (fake boss asking for more work this weekend as a cover for...).

Ideal chaff for the surveillance society.
This post tell us how undervalued Swedish startups are. We created the term `Swedish series A` a while back, which is around ~$1m - $3m. Interesting that this a seed round elsewhere. High tax and all.. :)
Linux Mint ISO Image Replaced by Hackers
America is ruled by corporations. It is unjust but can you imagine Apple, an american company, having fines or being rendered such that it was disadvantaged to sales in China/India or setting off its decline.

The only time the exception was ever made was to prevent monopoly about a hundred or so years ago.

Otherwise its perfectly ok to be an American corporate citizen and challenge the law.
Likewise "What Universal Human Experiences are you Missing Without Realizing it?" from SlateStarCodex.

http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/03/17/what-universal-human-ex...
Never hear a voice. It just goes directly to symbols/images in my head. Exception when learning something difficult, at which time I slow down to words.
Yep.

The thing is, the company needs to understand that the smartest thing to do is to leave that person alone and task them on educating (here via docs, but also in other ways) the other developers (assuming the team is of sufficient size, which in my experience is the case as soon as total headcount is 3).

Hoarding expertise like that is a good way to waste company resources (because other devs function at a great disadvantage) and to bring down stress upon onself (becuase you become a bottleneck and that gets to be super stressful).

The fact of the matter is that it is anti-social and bad practice for these devs not to take a step back and write down the coherent vision of their product--and if they can't explain the vision in a handful of pages with some simple diagrams, they've probably deeply fucked up the design.

The company, management usually, needs to bite the bullet and sacrifice short-term firefighting ability for mid-to-long-term training.

If they won't do this, you should leave.
I would disagree with that interpretation. I would talk about the duration of the open() call, in the same way as when you're optimising code, you talk about the duration of a function call, not its latency.

Sadly, misuse of the term is rife in software circles.

Latency is correctly used when talking about how long an ISR takes to start running when provoked by an external stimulus, or how long it takes for a task to be scheduled when made ready.

Latency is a very precise term. a syscall, as its name suggests is a 'call', and 'calls' are not considered to be instantaneous.

(Edit: instantaneous, not atomic)

Duration is the correct term for syscalls.
It doesn't slow anything down.

That depends.

Some readers do what is known as "subvocalization"[1], where they literally speak the words they're reading, but silently, actuating the muscles in their tongue and throat as if they were speaking aloud. If you're doing that then it does slow you down.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subvocalization
sorry, he leads a party that openly called for shooting children at the border. He's fringe (or I hope so, because if he isn't, I need to emigrate)
Wow, that looks really impressive.

I wonder if the visual representation should somehow emphasize the slow calls more. The example on the page immediately draws the attention to that cluster of many fast calls, when the interesting part for optimizations is likely in the 100ms and slower range.
Your Python app doesn't have to run in a container at all. If you chose to run it in a container, and you wanted to use sidomo, you would have two options:

1 The container would need to be privileged so that it could run a docker daemon and containers (sidomo processes) within itself.

2 (the "right" way) Use the host's docker daemon from within the first container by binding the docker.sock to the child container. The first container can start and stop others that run next to it, instead of inside it. This way there's no recursion, and no containers need root privileges.
If the boyfriend/girlfriend ratio is 60/40, they could almost just connect these people together.
On your responses to @moistgorilla and @aninhumer: You refer o a problem between you and some others, and I say in my comment that you are the source of such problem. I did not have an intent of insult or personal attack, I'm sorry.

Follows a refutation of your response to me.

Firstly, you drew a profile, publically, of someone who is so pedantic that they couldn't interact with other people, and I commented on such profile, which incidentally happened to be yours. If you do not want comments on your character, why write about it on HN? And by answering you, I answered you and other people like you, thus commented on the situation itself, rather than your personal phenomenon. I don't know you, I wouldn't bother to attack your personality. You opened it to discussion, and I stated my ideas about it.

Now, on language, the purpose of the language is to communicate some meaning. Sarcasm is used to communicate some meaning to, but the meaning happens to be the opposite of the literal meaning of the words. Even abstract poetry does communicate something. Whether the message is coherent and comprehensible is another discussion. But language _cannot_ be used in a non-communicating manner.

You stated that you avoid social interaction because of others' ambiguous use of language. And I answered you mistake contexts and registers of language. I may have used the word problematic mistakenly--and I'm sorry if I did. English is my L2. But I do support my stance on the situation that you share with many others. I had severe social interaction problems, including those like yours, and one needs to admit them and understand that he is the source of the problem to be able to fix oneself. You may want to continue to be asocial, in which case it's your decision, I have no say, I'm not your psychiatrist. I comment on the situation that you described, that's all.
If you haven't been "trained" on what a psychiatrist's context is, how can you be expected to know what they "obviously" meant? I would think that it's the opposite: to the extent that the psychiatrist is unable to clarify their questions to arbitrary precision, spell out implications, etc, then s/he is the one with insufficient mastery to be taking on such a role (not that it matters in our "fake it till you make it" world).
I wonder if there's a way of using software licensing to bypass the issue. Consider this. What if there was a piece of encryption software where the copyright was held in the UK (i.e. not in the US). The key thing about this encryption library: it has a special license. One of its clauses says that it may not be edited, it may only be compiled by clang, may only be distributed in the form that results from a good-faith compilation under clang, and that - as a condition of use - the distributor may not implement workarounds. The US court would have no jurisdiction for ruling on the actions of the copyright owner. And Apple could defend its behaviour by saying that intellectual property law means that it is not within its rights/mandate to modify the included software.
What you described is what I'm hoping to see over the next few months. I joined the company recently, so there's still a lot of internals that I don't fully understand.
How much do you want to bet the parents pushed him into divorce in the first place?

tbh tho, you're not going to find well-adjusted people using these services, almost by definition.
Great work on your emulator. I am also looking forward to use webassembly for my emulator when available. However, I don't expect much speed improvement. I guess you can speed up your emulator significantly by putting in some '|0' noops to prevent deoptimizations into double precision.
I concede, these are good points. I'd like to add though, that it would be better overall to have a solution that at least tries to limit access to specific devices, rather than Apple being forced by the government to build in general backdoors. But I can't really think of a better solution. Maybe have a hierarchy of keys, one per some serial number suffix, each in different servers in different buildings and accessed by different people, so if one gets lost it at least only affects a fraction of devices on the market?
That will probably be in the next software version. One thing at a time.
Datacenters for information crunching, cyborgs for physical crunching... heaven is coming. Or is it.
Seconded. And if you have Access-Control-Allow-Credentials then Access-Control-Allow-Origin must reflect the origin, * is not enough.

It's safe to put Access-Control-Allow-Origin:* on any publicly-accessible server, since another server could simply proxy that stuff anyway.
Android MazarBot stealing credit card information in Italy is issued by Putin
What are the coolest functions on Bloomberg?
Given the powers these two characters have, Superman would kill Batman while watching a movie with Lois Lein and eating pop-corn - without Lois realising he was gone for a split of a second.

ps. Not big on DC/Marvel comics/movies, they're all the same to me but keep some f*cking consistency plz.
Many people are willing to pay to increase their social proof or status.. There's probably an untapped market for selling e-points.
Pedantically, I would contend that anything some people are missing out on fails the test for being a "universal experience", because it's not universal unless everyone has it, so the answer to the title of that post is "nothing".
> and 'calls' are not considered to be atomic in any way.

A lot of syscalls should be considered atomic with regards to resources. open() has at least two options this applies to. What kind of atomic do you mean?
Ah-ha! This was a great insight for me. I can't not subvocalise when reading. But I too certainly don't subvocalise when reading code. Now I know what it's like.
I am more than happy to contribute but I have a feeling you've mistaken me with someone else? :)
The Apple Pencil: Proof That Apple Is Losing Its Design Mojo?
The exotic new weapons the Pentagon wants to deter Russia and China
ICMP and IP network mapping tricks
The flip side to this is that is doesn't look/behave alien when you change platform.
Sorry, you sound like those crypto nuts from various cryptography mailing lists. Curve25519 has been discussed to death during CFRG selection process (see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11161315). If you (or these "Russian cryptoexperts") have legitimate concerns, please publish them and save the world!
Proving with Types
There's no board for UK government IT projects.

The process starts with lobbyists (from the likes of Fujitsu, CSC etc) offering fancy dinners, a few trips to the opera, family holiday in Barbados, and crucially a revolving door, behind which is a future lucrative senior position should they decide to engage the services of said company. Lucrative senior position will in part involve lobbying former government friends and colleagues.

And so the cycle continues...
Selfmanagement societies vs. anarchocapitalism: The new global war of ideologies?
Uber, what? Taxify is the most popular taxi startup in the Baltics
Dating isnt simply a matching problem... maybe these people don't want to connect with a real person?
Well then they could be fake couples together
Discussions with people with lower level of knowledge is an educating thing: you have to communicate your knowledge in a simpler, more open way. It gives you the ability to better understand what you know, for one can know things without understanding them.
And you can always draw multiple small samples, as recommended with actual pinprick glucose meters.

Or you might be able to take smaller vials.
I wonder how does this business scale. $15 a month is not much for paying salary.
I got a blank screen every time the wizard prompted me to accept the EULA after the upgrade, so the app became unusable to me. Fortunately the 2.1 installer is available at http://downloads.atlassian.com/software/sourcetree/SourceTre... and after installing that I could get straight back to work. Even though they say they've have fixed this issue since I'm not very keen on upgrading anytime soon tbh.
> It makes total sense that the givernment would use it's forensic capabilities whenever the need arises.

Assuming you mean "its" then apple's capabilities are not the government's. The government could physically attack the chips holding the data instead.

They're just risk-/effort-averse and would like others do the work for them.
Show HN: Indian pincode information
Wow - whats up with forcing people to login - what is the catch? what is the point?

Feels like when an app wants access to your GPS, contacts and microphone and you wonder for what reason...
Wow so the FBI lied. Imagine that.

Guess law enforcement thinks telling the truth is not something "good guys" are required to do.
* The 50 publicly recognized richest people on Earth. *

Putin [1] is a great example of how little we know about who holds the real money, and the real power. Also the blurbs about each of the fifty were a little to cheery for what some of them probably did to gain their money (especially those from corrupt countries).

[1]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/02/20...
Thank you i will forward it to them.
When you first install Sourcetree (and every year thereafter) you have to register it with an email address. Is this just that or is it different? (ie. have they started requiring an always-on connection to Atlassian or something?)
Agreed, it should feel familiar. But also respect the platform conventions. Nobody ever said UX was supposed to be easy, did they? :)
Maybe this is what actually happens, but they don't tell anyone ;)
That's romantic comedy stuff. Both sides believe they've hired a bot but have been secretly matched and are just talking to each other, to save costs. They are really happy with the "relationship" they have with the "bot". When they find out, they are outraged and sue the company...
Original article is from http://www.r2d3.us/visual-intro-to-machine-learning-part-1/

Remind me of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11133950
How can I provide parameters to the experiment function?
Yes, the range of not great. (30 m) How did it react to multiple access points in the vicinity? Or noise signals? From what I know that is the main reason why Wi-Fi or Zigbee or BLE is not passive.
Have you considered that this might actually be what they're doing? ;)
I was using the new version for about a week now and besides some bugs I really don't like the new design. After working with SourceTree for 2 years it feels like I have to learn a new application.
I'm now checking out GitKraken which looks quite promising after the first hours of working with it.
I think the morality based approach is not going to work for the majority of society, as it didn't in the past. Instead, we should take an analytic approach and focus on maximizing integration (freedom to act) and differentiation (freedom to think).

Integration is the idea that we should all have the ability to leave our mark on society. In other words, it means to have access.

Differentiation is the idea that we should be free to be different, that we should not fear for our physical safety. Unless people have the ability to express their creativity without restraint, we will have a society like the old Communist block, and we are headed to that with the latest mass surveillance policies, unfortunately.

An example of a differentiated and integrated society is the Open Source community. Another example is the brain, which has an astounding number of components tightly integrated yet differentiated. A third example would be the free market, where each agent tries to differentiate its offering from the competition and yet also has to be closely integrated with the other agents in order to benefit from the opportunities they create. A fourth example: the ecosystem, where each species is differentiated in order to benefit from a niche yet they also need to be integrated and function as a complex whole.

If we have differentiation and integration in society then our minds can cooperate to build a better future, organically, from the grassroots. In such a society a person would be free to be creative and have a low entry barrier to the market. If we took these two core principles and try to optimize them in society and politics, we'd maximize happiness. A differentiated-integrated system has a superior ability to adapt and find solutions to its problems.
Heavily armed police supress a book (Czech Republic, 2014)
I can't wait until it works, you must ping HN again when it does!
I don't get why Atlassian have a source tree blog if they're not going to engage with their users. Last I checked there are 66 horribly critical comments. And no-one from Atlassian have engaged at all.
No, you have to register a full Atlassian account with all of your personal details. A single email address is not enough anymore.
Excellent article, it explains pretty much the same (but with much more mathematical detail) as the article I wrote some months ago about why parser generator tools are mostly useless [1] .

[1] https://buguroo.com/why-parser-generator-tools-are-mostly-us... .
Read like a self promotional piece, a database solutions shop posting a bunch of top ten ways to do x blog posts done by various consultants and colleagues, where x is any of (big data, design, architecture, engineering, performance.. with databases).
What is the reason that systemd has to include a bootloader (bootctl -- which was gummiboot)? Why does it include a container engine (nspawn)? Why does it think that it should control all logging on your system (the whole journalctl monstrosity)?

Yes, it might've been hyperbole, but the fact that systemd has so much code inside it which has nothing to do with "being an init system" just begs the question "why?".
I'd suggest 20 years, and 10% of jobs can be replaced by machine is a more accurate assessment. The latest revision of the Atlas is an interesting technology demo - but I think progress in this space will be much, much slower than automated driving (which I expect to see 25% penetration in 10 years - that is, 25% of all driving, based on miles driven, will be hands/foot free).

Even something as simple (and very, very low cost) as making up a room in a hotel, is probably 25-30 years off at least.
Perhaps the middle part of the argument is missing?
People who care about privacy == people who use encryption. People who use encryption already have all of their communications flagged and stored, if the rumors are true.
Yeah, because documentation has its own costs.

I've been thinking about setting up a forum. That's a flexible form and might encourage creating the documentation that actually answers real questions.