skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
This is very enlightening. I am not sure if people are aware but arranged marriages are still prevalent in India (which these days means being asked to meet someone and decide in few months if you would want to get married). Although, it seems a bit awkward and more of being forced into it but there is statistical evidence that it can work out really well.

If people enjoy being together, love develops eventually.
targeting both MySQL and Postgresql is very reasonable and is commonplace. Openstack does it, for example. Lots of apps do. This assumes you're doing an app that's mostly CRUD. If you're doing a BI kind of app and need fancy analytical functions, then yes you'd target Postgresql.
This is what they were talking about on Fox News earlier today.
People aren't robots so meritocracy is a pipe dream. Everyone has biases (just different ones). And if that's how the world works, then why the criticism of "whitey" being shaken down?
Your post smacks of "don't hate the player, hate the game" kind of reasoning. Another word for this is "Supremacy" or "Entitlement". A black candidate doesn't get the job so maybe he or she isn't qualified, but as soon as the tables are turned for a white candidate, then all hell breaks loose.

In an ideal setting, the best candidate gets the job. But who is the best candidate? The black guy who doesn't live in the bay area, with no formal education but had to self teach himself programming because he couldn't afford to go to school?
Or the recent Stanford grad that is more likely a culture fit (looks and sounds like the interviewer) with the grades but not the real world experience (yet)?
Well, then you have code written for a company on company and code written under a contributor agreement.

A lot of code that ended up under free licenses has been proprietary first and while they cannot revoke the free licenses from already released code they can make their next release non-free as long as they haven't accepted outside contributions without a suitable contributor agreement.
Right now I'm looking at a Z-80 gate that is three triple-input ANDs, all NORed together, and this is a single gate.

An "AOI333", like this?

Vdd
|
+-|
|--+
+<| |
| |
+----+---> out
|
+----+----+
| | |
+-+ +-+ +-+
-+ -+ -+
+>+ +>+ +>+
| | |
+-+ +-+ +-+
-+ -+ -+
+>+ +>+ +>+
| | |
+-+ +-+ +-+
-+ -+ -+
+>+ +>+ +>+
| | |
+----+----+
|
Vss

It's a good example of how even at the hardware level, abstraction can hide optimisation --- someone who didn't know about these compound gates would just design with the regular ones, using far more transistors than necessary. That (NMOS) gate has a total of 10 transistors, while the equivalent with individual gates would take 22 (6 for each AND -- 3 pulldown + 1 pullup for a NAND, followed by another 2 for an inverter, feeding into a 4-transistor NOR-3), more than double.

Given how "loose" its layout is compared to the Z80, I guess the ARM1 doesn't have very many compound gates either? I wonder if they could've gotten an even lower-power and faster ARM1 if they did manually optimise the layout.
But when compiling to C you can't do much better than #line. So it doesn't strike me of much of an argument in favor of compiling to C.
> This is hard to say

We do know that IMAs have significantly decreased. As the department reports on the numbers in detention[1] (See figure 1)

The ABC also kept a log of all reports[2]

1) http://www.border.gov.au/ReportsandPublications/Documents/st...

2) http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-25/log-of-boat-arrivals-a...
what's the point? you just rebased with a incompatible tree. nobody will be able to update that because their trees will say the commit differs.

and in the only case this would work, i.e. nobody has that commit yet, you could just have commited as that person. nothing new or interesting.

now, github being garbage and not accounting for PGP signatures, now this is something else.
Did not know that. Our company gets deductions for R&D spending, which is sort of like investment.
Right -- I was wondering more where I would go for the social aspect.

As much as github is about just hosting code, it's also become a place where people who code/contribute to open source gather -- it doesn't seem right now like someone would just run a gitlab instance big enough to rival what github has become. Maybe the better question is when someone will step up to create that service/meeting ground.
I commonly have academic computer science papers rejected for a variety of these reasons. That is, the reviewers do not have any factual or methodology concerns; they don't think we're wrong, or that we made any mistakes designing our experiments. They just don't like it.

I've started to call these "Your baby is ugly" reviews.
Software Development Explained with Cars
Long (album) version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kRVwcPTnug8

Short (single) version: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTlM6OBRc8w

By Sweet:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Sweet

(You may know them better for The Ballroom Blitz:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_jdiU47bFA ).
It means there's an excessive amount of inside baseball terminology for people paying too much attention to the machinations of chip manufacturers. It all seems very important.
> from the article: "In my prototype system, c-amplify, I’m doing exactly this. The system introduces an "amplification" phase where s-expressions are transformed to C code before a traditional build system runs."

haven't gambit/chicken already tried something similar for scheme ? don't know what the latest state of affairs there is though.
> And no milk ofcourse although that's probably the hardest part to leave out.

There's nothing wrong with milk, unless you're not including it in your diet tracking, react poorly to it, or have a personal opposition to drinking it.
Not really a "tool" per se, but the vast collection of archive.org is also worth mentioning. There's plenty of great reading, listening, and watching material there, and it also crawls and archives websites too.
The easiest thing is probably to check in a known hosts file. Hopefully your revision control server has a stable host key.
Thompson, like many (if not most) American journalists of her time, was a Stalin apologist in the Duranty circle:

http://spartacus-educational.com/USAthompsonD.htm

I'm not sure any intellectual who collaborated with Hitler should get points for warning the world about Stalin. Or vice versa.

If Harper's had written an article called "Who Goes Bolshevik" in 1941, it could have been much shorter: "pretty much everyone." Or at least, everyone who mattered. If you wanted the truth about Stalin in 1941, you'd do much better with the Voelkischer Beobachter than the New York Times.
I realize it was just an example, but in Bitbucket you can hit 'f' on the file view, type part of a filename, select it and hit blame.

I'm a dev attached to the Bitbucket team and we're pretty proud of our design, and always looking for ways to streamline the UX. Are there any other operations that you find cumbersome or unintuitive?
Also, move sshd to a random & rarely-used TCP port. Won't help much against a skilled & determined targeted attack, however the "security through obscurity" is not entirely worthless. Using something other than 22 is quite effective at avoiding spray-n-pray scans and exploits.

For extra credit, set up port knocking.
you know what the problem is there, that a. parsing your SQL string into a tokenized structure b. altering it based on your given instructions c. re-compiling it back into a string, all on top of an interpreted scripting language, and then d. sending it to a database so that the database can parse it a second time, is just so inefficient, for a particular API style that is arguably not even any better than just learning how to write Core expressions. Core and ORM expressions can be cached to their resultant SQL to save on the tokenized-structure->string step too.

there are certainly SQL parsers that can easily produce such tokenized structures and from a technical standpoint, your API is pretty simple to produce, with or without shallow or deep SQLAlchemy integrations. It's just there's not really any interest in such a system and it's never been requested.
Access isn't too hard if you can get up early and hustle. I went to NH (invited by my SO), the candidates like publicity and photographs (bring a camera they said). Though I had to go through a metal detector they were fine with my rig (slr and 100-400mm lens, not small) I posted a couple "cc".

Though in the age of the cell phone, these photos pretty much they way things are going.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/acomjean/23968845552/
and the tablet:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/acomjean/23450142553/

tv still seems to employee more than still photos..
https://www.flickr.com/photos/acomjean/24076930115/in/photos...

and the candidate:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/acomjean/23450138963/

As former photo editor of my college (UMass daily) paper and someone who knows a couple people that make a living at it (though one is a freelance "stringer"), its truly is a hard way to make a living. Oddly I talked to one and after 15 years he's not loving like he used too, sees to much of the same things, finding it hard to keep a fresh perspective.
What's wrong with automated bug reporting tools? I am very grateful for the 100/1000s of automated reports we get, they would be near impossible to shake out of even a technical user.
>This has significantly deterred economic migrants

That and the big ocean lying between them and everyone else.
This is how all network security appliances work.

All IDS or IPS appliances do this. Running something open source like Snort or Suricata? It's "MitMing" you, too. (More accurately "Man-on-the-Side'ing" for most installations, since they're typically IDS and not IPS, but I'm just using the same alarmist term you did to make my point.)

All "smart firewalls" (sometimes dubbed "nextgen firewalls" by marketing departments) do this. If your network uses firewalls from Palo Alto, that firewall is doing nearly the exact same things as this Fidelis appliance. Either most of the same features, or all of the same if you pay a little extra.

All proxies do this, except only for 80/443.

All host IDS agents do this as well.

>(and is already done, indirectly and efficiently by chrome for instance)

Chrome isn't going to detect your machine beaconing out via malware that's already installed. Chrome just has lists of bad URLs and URL paths. Chrome's security features certainly provide another useful layer of protection, but is not nearly sufficient as a malware or intrusion detection system by itself.

This article is FUD, in my opinion, for singling out just this specific appliance as if it's somehow more invasive than all the other gear on a typical large network. If you want to make an article about how packet inspection is bad in general, go ahead, but I think that war has been lost. If you're using someone else's network and computers, I don't think you should have a problem with a device checking the packets your computer sends and receives to see if they match specific regex or byte patterns.

It's true that a proprietary appliance is going to be a bit more blackbox with exactly how it processes traffic, compared to an open source solution, but often the signature lists themselves are accessible and configurable by the customer. Sometimes the actual signature content is visible as well.

Systems like these are absolutely necessary to help prevent breaches, as long as there are competent internal employees who can make full use of them. Perhaps an open source system will be a little bit better privacy-wise, on the off chance the proprietary solution you're using is secretly doing something malicious or sending sensitive traffic elsewhere on the Internet, though if it were, the scandal would likely greatly harm or ruin the company.
In the USA alcohol was prohibited in the 1920s, and there was a knocking problems with gas engines going over a certain speed that needed to be fixed. They tried different additives until they found lead works.

People got sick on the exhaust but the industry covered it up. It wasn't until later that it was discovered that people got sick on the lead in the exhaust that they switched to ethanol an alcohol based on corn. Prohibition was over by decades by then and ethanol was healthier than lead and solved the knocking problem plus farmers made money growing corn to add to the gas.

Lead paint was the same way, they hid the fact that it made people sick so they could sell more of it.

Lead pipes or copper pipes with lead soldier was used the same way and the safety risks were hidden to people as well.

Lead is a neurotoxin and leads to mental illnesses and brain damage. People effected might have violent outbursts and get arrested for crimes. If there is lead in the water supplies of the poor neighborhoods that minorities live in it could be the cause of crime by those who drink the water, bathe in it, cook with it, etc. This is being hidden as well and just now is being reported on by some news media companies.

Corporations get away with stuff like that because of the ignorance of the public and their short-term memories. Lead has always been a neurotoxin but people tend to forget that and it gets covered up when it is used in products and pipes and other stuff.
Oh, and regarding the request for a Rust AST to C compiler, I hope that doesn't happen for a number of reasons. First, it undoes the work we're doing on MIR, which is very important (you couldn't run MIR-level optimizations, the borrow check and codegen would be at high risk of divergence, we'd have to take a big backwards step to serializing ASTs for generics, etc.) Second, it'd be very hard to dodge C's undefined behavior: think of what we'd have to do to make signed integer overflow crash cleanly instead of leading to UB, just to name one particularly egregious problem...
RealtyShares CEO Nav Athwal on Crowd-Funding
It's not an issue, I have been using a separate email for all development purposes. You should always separate your email addresses for different purposes, that including my mobile contacts.
It's all a matter of prioritization. In an ideal world, address all the issues and be perfectly secure. But if you have to choose by priorities, private ssh key compromise is not exactly at the top of my concerns because people are generally careful about their keys.
Those trees must have taken hundreds of years to grow so wide. Chopping them down for wood would never be sustainable (that's why they are gone, right?). The great win of this technology is that you can use small trees that grow fast and can be sourced from managed/sustainable forests.
This is a more general phenomenom, like tends to hang out with like, not necessarily out of bigotry towards the un-likes, but just out of familiarity. It's really "seperate but equal" all over again.

Honestly, it just comes down to being open minded, which has to happen on an individual level. I'm open minded by necessity, because there are very few of my race in the USA, much less my current city.
I guess we can argue over what it means for a political party to win, but the Nazi party were never able to gain the support of the majority of the German people.
As someone posted in the comments: http://markrifeprivate.tumblr.com
By "posts I've made (which AFAICS is not possible)" I meant the messages further up the thread, where the edit link had long since expired, but I wasn't 100% sure if there was another way to do it.
I once saw a guy in the local maker space spend a couple hours programming a CNC milling machine & arranging a complicate series of clamps and shims to hold a work piece he intended to drill. 15 seconds into his run the drill bit bound up in the work piece. Since the mill was set to pulse drill on the up stroke it snatched the work piece out of the jig that was holding it. On the next downstroke it totally obliterated his jig and then hurled the work piece across the machine shop. 15 feet away there was a set of collets that would have worked way better than the printed ABS widget he was using to hold his workpiece. There was also a bog standard drill press standing next to the table the collets were on. If this dude had simply chucked his piece in a collet and walked over to the drill press his parts run would have taken 15 minutes, likely with no ballistic interludes. The really shocking part was that he was in the machine shop at all. Normally it, the welding stations, and the wood shop were deserted and there was always a line (sometimes hours long) to access the laser cutter, 3d printer, and CNC router table. The three tools in the shop that could be controlled with a laptop and that required no direct tool use on the part of the operator. That always bothered me for reasons I can't fully articulate.
FWIW, I recall there was a terminal emulator called Power Shell back in the day. I don't know if we bought the name or...500 lb. Gorilla...
Individual venture capital from parents to their son. Probably a lot less than a brand name university, with a lot more benefit in terms of network, personal brand, and skills.
The point of a preposterous myth is that it is a wedge issue that allows the majority to identify "enemies" and dangerous dissidents, because intelligent people just can't help themselves. It creates a target rich environment for the truly contemptible who will inform on, denounce, and betray their neighbors for a few extra rations or a commendation from some apparatchik, maybe just a fellowship.

An absurd dogma causes trouble makers to self-select out. The "%1/%99" trope was cheap demagoguery, and to this day reliably identifies skeptics as discreditable "liberarians," or "tea baggers," and "probably racists."

Occupy had no resources to distribute, and no ultimatum for the upper middle classes, so as a revolution it was a dud. Post-modern feminism has been a successful revolution (unless it's counter-revolutionary to say the revolution has ended already, comrade)because its resource was essentially sex, whereby male academics and administrators were convinced that being a "sensitive new age guy" would get them laid, and that critical theory was something more than gibberish.

This ushered in a generation of cultural studies programs that exist primarily to legitimize the victimization claims of groups who incorporate an anti-capitalist mandate into their demands for public money. Governments are cool with it because 1. they are non-violent demands for more revenue, and 2. government defers to those academics as "expert" policy advisers. It's a bit of a circle squirt.

BLM has the chance to be a successful revolutionary movement, much moreso than the Oregon ranch guys or some of the militias, but they haven't got the formula down yet. I don't want to help because all these movements have totalitarian aims, as from their perspective it's ok if it's a dictatorship of "good" people.

Have fun storming the castle!
Dev attached to the Bitbucket team here. While we love and support open source where we can, the vast majority of repositories on Bitbucket are private or public but maintained by a single organization. Our core focus is professional teams, which typically means branching (rather than forking) workflows. This has lead us to prioritize features like branch level permissions over network graphs and other features focused on forking workflows, because they are of higher value to our users. We're not ideologically opposed to them (indeed, forks are useful for some professional workflows too - such as working with contractors or external contributors), but they just haven't bubbled up to the top of our roadmap just yet.
NY Public Library Releases 670k Images
you are deeply wrong, friend. Our, and the soviet, rocket development was very clearly ICBM development - thats no secret. North Korea is quite obviously following the same path. Yes, it is a technical accomplishment - no they are not to be congratulated : do you live in a cave? They are universally condemned not because they can do engineering, but because they are an affront to civilization.
Given the number of political and ethnic refugees it would appear that asylum doesn't scale for these categories either.
I feel like someone isn't fully groking the beauty of decentralized / distributed version control systems...
Could we have a multi-pronged approach?

Minimum wage of $12 or $15 is great, but in many places still not a true middle class wage, especially for a head of household. But, still it's a worthwhile law to put on the books and it does help entry level workers and others.

On top of that, union wages are great for those who are in them and actually have enough work to be full time.

In addition, to address another group in society, we can empower service providers who are small business owners with state licensing boards to help them control their market segment and truly attain durable middle class living standards.

We can have it all. What's not to love?
There are still around a billion people who don’t have enough to eat and many more who are only a poor harvest away from starving.
I know what you mean, but there's another side. For instance just on:

> Support tickets probably shouldn't be public, for that matter.

Open GitHub issues, combined with Google, have turned out surprisingly useful to me as a user of open source packages.
Often an answer to some trouble I've run into is found in an issue -- both 'support' ticket style issues, and development roadmap style issues, and the line sometimes gets blurred.

Also, there's a positive aspect of the blurring of the boundaries in open source -- when a user contributes code, or documentation.

But yeah, people running open source projects need to at least think about how they're going to deal with project management as well as support at some point, and just the thinking about it and the iterating to figure out how to do it better is for some a chore they don't want to do. The projects that figure out how to do this well are the ones that are a joy to use or to contribute to though.

Oh, and my experience I'm talking from is with open source code packages meant for use by developers. Open source end-user applications (including OSs like Linux) are a different animal, and are _much harder_ to deal with support and project management and the overlap, in my observation. Not sure which you were thinking of, but now I'm thinking maybe end-user apps.
>80% of Syrian population lives in Syrian government controlled territory.

Citation, please.
+1. I can't say enough good things about Terra.

I self identify as a Lisper (Clojure), but have done a fair amount of professional work in C/C++/Go too. I was productive in Lua/Terra practically overnight. I ported a bunch of Rust (that I had originally ported from C and was considering porting back to C + custom string-templating) to Lua in a few days and the code got shorter, simpler, faster, and with build times of a tiny fraction of those in Rust. Terra just matches how I think about programming low-level code: Types are about shifting work to compile time. Yes, some error-detection work, sure, but that's totally secondary for me as compared to shifting work to compile time for performance, memory representation, etc.
Choosing to only bind SSH to a VPN interface is another option. If you can utilize a VPN that incorporates 2FA then that's even better. Projects such as zerotier are going a long way towards making this kind of thing easier to setup.