skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Non-paywall version: [1]

Probably the way to deal with this is to have an exhaust system which keeps the build chamber below atmospheric pressure. Exhaust through a water air filter.[2] Water air filters work well on particles, but you have to keep dumping the dirty water and adding fresh water. They're not used much in HVAC or vacuum cleaners because they take a lot of blower power, but for a small 3D printer, where you're not moving much air, they should work.

[1] http://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsale...
[2] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyEyO4iuz5E
I cant see this as evolution, because its still going on the same direction, only more adequated to the modern times.

It still force's the goal of beauty, success, fame, prestige, money.. far from the reality of life of most people in the world. There isnt a "chubby barbie" for instance.. its natural in kids to be happy with whatever/whoever they are, thats whats awesome in kids.

The only way to advance, evolve in this matter, is propably a reality where kids dont care about barbie anymore, and instead of impossible role models, they would choose something else, probably something where they are the ones creating and doing stuff, and not a external role-model of what they are supposed to be when they grow up, that can be the cause of a lot of frustration and impossibility to have a dialetic relation with their own reality, and try to improve it as a result.
Why you shouldn't trust successful people's advice
If the tool itself only supports running on Chrome and Safari (i.e. webkit), I wouldn't trust the tool to produce code anywhere near standards compliant or deployable on the public web.
Jump in the Sea and Swim with Salmon
Because the operators of the servers cannot be trusted.

SSL/TLS protects the data in motion, from people monitoring the networking by illegitimately MITMing users.

GPG protects data at rest from server operators reading things they should not.
I really think one of the important aspects is that it should be much easier to reverse engineer proprietary drivers now given how explicit the API is supposed to be.
If you enlist Mt. Gox to rationalize this as, "huh, what do you expect when you use the word 'privacy?', I'm not sure that's a strong position.

And if you're privacy minded you should already know - most privacy debates that make the news - are moot.

Mooted by what? The fragility of privacy itself?
Up to the point that your SMTP session is decrypted. It TLS is terminated by your campus's middlebox, it is in their purview.
The site and the linked resources talk about handshakes: only a small percentage of your traffic should actually require a full handshake, since most of your users are going to request multiple files. Basic benchmarks don't do that and therefore provoke a worst-case you are unlikely to see in real usage. Might be relevant for APIs, ad servers or similar though.
Substeps-webdriver, r1.0.0 released
Putting a stop to bullying
So, thanks to your comment, I learned that pinegrow exists. I'm completely impressed. It's clearly a non-trivial amount of work put into a pretty solid-looking package. Why are you so offended by a piece of software asking to be purchased?
Money quote:

> - The intrusive device is capable of capturing and analyzing all network traffic to and from the Berkeley campus, and has enough local storage to save over 30 days of all this data ("full packet capture"). This can be presumed to include your email, all the websites you visit, all the data you receive from off campus or data you send off campus.

Just how expensive was that system?!
> simpler, shorter, clearer than init.d/ scripts [...] Automatic restarts on failures

For those of us who've had both of these things since around the turn of the century, this improvement was not brought by systemd; so it hasn't helped in this particular regard at all. (-:
How did you measure this?

When measuring on one of my servers that exposes both HTTP and HTTPS, there doesn't appear to be any significant difference.

HTTP:

% wrk http://hostname
Running 10s test @ http://hostname
2 threads and 10 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 5.11ms 5.42ms 62.85ms 96.08%
Req/Sec 1.10k 224.03 1.31k 87.04%
17703 requests in 10.01s, 6.89MB read
Requests/sec: 1768.57
Transfer/sec: 704.58KB

HTTPS:

% wrk https://hostname
Running 10s test @ https://hostname
2 threads and 10 connections
Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev
Latency 4.75ms 4.09ms 50.37ms 96.48%
Req/Sec 1.10k 228.86 1.34k 79.35%
17014 requests in 10.01s, 8.39MB read
Requests/sec: 1700.32
Transfer/sec: 858.38KB
I've been using Pingendo for about 1 year now at home and at work. Super fun app to use, and makes some really nice and clean code in the end.
Thanks, we changed the URL to that from http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b04983.
I block port 25 out because of spam / bot problems with student computers, but I would be curious any reason to do a relay. That doesn't make a heck of sense.
Simula was not an object oriented language, it was a procedural language with objects; that's a very different thing. Smalltalk took objects and made them primary, everything, even the language itself is built upon the foundation of objects. True and False for example are not language elements, they are singleton instances of the classes True and False which are both subclasses of Boolean. What are "if" statements in other languages, including Simula (a superset of AGOL) are virtual methods in Smalltalk in the Boolean hierarchy.

Simula invented objects and added them as an option to a procedural language; Smalltalk took them and built a language out of them and thus coined the term Object Oriented.
"When it comes to securing ourselves, anything coming from the NSA should be treated as some form of disinformation."

"The NSA betrayed its "information security" brief long ago and can never be trusted on that front again."

Err, sort of. They were a valuable part of the field in the 80's and 90's, esp for evaluations. Their own stuff that's actually designed for security is done well and has some things to teach us. These are often called Type 1 products, GOTS high-security, and so on. They're not available to the general public because they work. ;)

Here's an accurate picture of DOD/NSA's involvement in creating INFOSEC in business and destroying it later for politics/legal/business/intel reasons from one of old guard:

http://lukemuehlhauser.com/wp-content/uploads/Bell-Looking-B...

The reasons they stopped pushing it aren't even clear to me at this point. Individuals and businesses rejected almost all high-security products in favor of maximal features, backward compatibility w/ insecure stuff, integration with insecure stuff, faster even if unsafe (eg C lang), cheaper even if less safe, and smaller even if forcing insecure integrations. This was true before, during, and after Walker's CSI. Still is post-Snowden as real security cost money and has tradeoffs that most users refuse.

So, the reason we're getting hacked all the time & NSA's IAD is doing little isn't really NSA: it's demand side where people refuse to do anything secure and use insecure stuff en masse. This is true even with usable alternatives: Facebook Messenger vs Threema or whatever; no disk protection vs Truecrypt full disk; no backups vs automated backups to USB; paid, non-snooping, $5/month email vs free, sell-you-out email. Convenience or price almost always win out.

So, NSA could disappear entirely and our situation would still be the same. Plus, they deserve credit for their participation in high assurance stuff that stops even them, which is published in enough detail to copy, and which continues to this day. Example on CPU side:

http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/pete/acl206/slides/hardin.pdf

https://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/inline_media_encryptor/

https://www.nsa.gov/applications/ia/tempest/index.cfm

So, no, you're best off learning what CompSci, DOD, NSA, and INFOSEC's founders taught us under the banner of high assurance security. Ignore whatever they teach general public or business unless trustworthy pro's will peer review it. Best practices are insufficient as they don't address lifecycle assurance of computer hardware or software. They leave in the vulnerabilities NSA and black hats will continue to hit. So, one must from bottom to top apply high-security techniques to make a better stack.

Even post-Snowden, that activity is pretty much non-existent enough that I can count the projects on one or both hands. I rest my case about the problem being on demand and supply sides.
To Lions, Zebras Are Mostly Gray
If lazy ass msie6-grade devs don't get told off when they do stuff like this they may get the impression that it's actually acceptable.

That's not happening on my watch. We've been here once already. That was enough.
I feel that raising your child like so (having fewer rules) in fact parallels doing well later in life. The measure of success, especially here on hacker news, feels heavily skewed towards making money, success in the Silicon Valley, etc. But while some creative lifestyles may not make enough money (poets, writers, artists) I would argue that they would end up living more fulfilling lives, following their intrinsic motivations rather than any socially constructed notion of success.
Hmm, I work in Switzerland and earn more than the proposed national wage (1700 GBP). Does that mean that my salary will also be lowered to that level?
The author's notion of a "dataset" is weird.
Under "Finance", there's a link to Google Finance page ( http://finance.google.com/ ). How is that a "dataset" ??
Re: bureaucracy

If it was truly universal - no exceptions, no means-testing, etc - then the "bureaucracy" around this one is negligible.

While I'm intrigued by a Basic Income approach, I don't think the bureaucracies would be willing to give up the power that they have to shape and influence people and society as a whole. It is exceptionally rare in human history that a government has given up power.

I think that is what will kill most of these Basic Income proposals, not even considering the math of taxes.
Would anyone know in the USA if there was a "30 day full packet capture" system on every ISP ?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_security_letter

No judicial review. At all.
Consider that disasters scale fractally. You're much more likely to see a failed AI superintelligence destroy the one supplier of critical infrastructure product XYZ, than directly destroying the world. Its fractal self similar on a smaller scale of hubris, bad specification, bad planning, bad back out plans, poor estimation, bad competitive risk taking.

The AI super intelligence that destroys our only global manufacturer of XYZ is very likely to be written in Excel in a spreadsheet convincing the execs that selling junk bonds and opening an ambitious new plant is a great idea, fast forward five years and humanity literally has no CPUs, or no flash memory, or no spark plug insulators. Its very unlikely to be black and white mad 1950s movie mad scientist writes bad LISP code that makes a humanoid-ish robot self aware making it crack open the smallpox vials intentionally. Its also worth considering that "we" are pretty good at destruction with existing dumb tools, it seems unlikely we'd need intelligent tools when simpler cheaper dumb tools cause equal chaos. It didn't take an AI to destroy HP, or Bell Labs, for example.

Its statistically possible that the first AI super intelligence failure will instantly vaporize the planet in the same sense that its thermodynamically possible for all molecules in a box of air to randomly be found on one side of the box, however unlikely. In a similar way its very likely we'll have AI destroying individuals, companies, industries, markets, countries, long before it destroys the species.
Thunderbird changed years ago to not allow soft-fallback for STARTTLS (i.e., if you request to use STARTTLS, and it's not available, it aborts the connection). I'm pretty sure that the account config also doesn't let you set up connections without STARTTLS or SSL without clicking through scary red this-is-not-safe dialogs, although I don't know if that's only for incoming or if it's for outgoing as well.
Mostly when I face people that get a rise out of me, whether in a personal or business setting. How best do I react? What's the correct move? Do I respond in kind, with hostility, or is there a better way?

That quote has wandered into my mind in innumerable number of situations.
They probably need to automate the "upgrade to latest" box, current version would be OpenSSL 1.0.2f 28 Jan 2016.

Anyway, I am not convinced the `openssl speed` benchmark output conveys anything to the people addressed by the site.
Thanks, I see what is meant now. Don't know why I'm getting downvoted either. Seems a rather innocuous question by someone not native to Switzerland.
Kids use it more sure, but most adults still eat ketchup, just on certain dishes like fries for example. That children over do something doesn't make it a child's food.
I suspect the indexers/spiders don't work as well as they once did. Routinely I've been getting results for sketchy mirrors of StackOverflow or the MSDN forums, which link back to the original MSDN or SO post, but that original is nowhere to be found in the Google results.
No one is going to touch this unless you provide some source code.
Is this an open standard /follow up to RFC2812/2813 or is it a company trying to coopt an open standard and sell a closed service?
That's wonderful you are willing to help everybody (seriously).

But, I think people need to be aware that it's not just email: "The intrusive device is capable of capturing and analyzing all network traffic to and from the Berkeley campus, and has enough local storage to save over 30 days of all this data ("full packet capture"). This can be presumed to include your email, all the websites you visit, all the data you receive from off campus or data you send off campus."

Is there anything we can do to protect ourselves from, say, posting something into a HN forum? Or any chat program? Or FB chat, etc...?
I just bought this software and noticed that there is a standard "I agree to the terms and conditions" tickbox.

I read the terms and conditions and noted with some unease para 1.7:

"Customer may supply to Zine EOOD or allow Zine EOOD to use certain proprietary information, including service marks, logos, graphics, software, documents and business information and plans that have been authored or pre-owned by Customer. All such intellectual property shall remain the exclusive property of Customer and shall not be used by Zine EOOD for any purposes other than that under which the property was provided."

What on earth does that paragraph mean? I permit Zine EOOD to what information, exactly? And when does Zine EOOD imagine that I will supply that information to them?
It isn't 1930 anymore. You can't use past electrical systems as an argument of why your nation has the best plug.
I think you're deeply misunderstanding the underlying reasons for school shootings and disproportionately large prison populations.

It is like saying if we gave each homeless person money, we'd fix homelessness.

Now just replace homelessness with psychological issues and money with psychologist.
That ought to make our noses smaller by the same logic.
If you're repeatedly using 10px paddings, it doesn't really save anything to name your classes 'padding-10px'. Inlining your CSS is just as efficient. Plus, if you have to change your styling, e.g. from 10px to 12px, all of a sudden you have to change both the definition of the class AND the name of the class, which is a mess. And if you don't, you have a class called 'padding-10px' that is actually 12px and that is a real mess.

If you're naming your classes to create abstractions, i.e. 'article-box' or 'navbar-section' then it makes a lot more sense.
Not everyone harbors a wish to "really ascend to greatness" or nourishes a deep desire to "embrace total self improvement".

We're fine as we are, some of us.
When someone has spent years hiding compulsions, tics, tendencies, mood swings, panic attacks, delusions, irrational fears, and other neurotic behaviors, it's not as simple as "training yourself" out of it.

> until one takes responsibility for the problems they're facing and stops hoping for an easy fix...

You have just delivered a more eloquently articulated version of the "be a man and suck it up" mentality that does way more harm than good. This sort of reductionist hand waving does not result in useful or practical advice. I suspect it is coming from your limited experience with these issues.

EDIT: I also find it gross that you consider getting help from a psychologist an attempt to find a "easy fix". As if sufferers don't put in A LOT of additional effort themselves...
But wouldn't you also make less for the same job in Germany, making the relative ratio of income to cost not all that dissimilar?
Safari desktop as well.
Why is anyone familiar with email surprised that other people can read it ? Remember when people called email internet postcards ?
Can you give some anecdotes of where "understanding how any important/relevant technology works gives you an unbeatable edge over most of your peers"? Besides being able to pass a job interview. Naively I would assume that being able to apply these techniques (understanding cross validation, overfitting, domain expertise, etc) would be far more important than knowing the underlying logic of how to write them from scratch.
It's better to flag comments than make the thread worse by continuing a bad subthread.

To flag a comment, click its timestamp to go to its page, then click 'flag'. You need a small amount of karma (currently 31) before flag links appear.
How do you know that all your recipients' mail server aren't monitored (or webclient and the NSA pumps the data between the ssl termination and the web server, eg: google)?

As a rule of thumb, if you care enough that it should not be seen by others, encrypt before it is sent, before it is written to disk. You have no control over a stolen laptop, over what the backup servers (assuming remote backup), etc... If it is private, encrypt. There's a bit of a learning curve, but once you do it often enough it just becomes part of the workflow.

Good tools you should use on a regular basis: KeepassX, gpg, Enigmail
For what it's worth, Ireland, Hong Kong and Singapore also use this socket type (among others). As someone who grew up with these sockets and moved to the US, I have definitely found the British type to be far more robust. The sockets in my US apartment have terrible grip, with my laptop charger often sliding out, which certainly soundly happen with the British style.
Brackets – A modern, open source code editor that understands web design
That might be true if you ignore the distorting effects of propaganda. What the people want, and what they can be made to believe they want through targeted media campaigns selling lies are not the same thing. Small groups with money can have out sized influence that distorts democracy in the short and medium term.
Sorry I meant "Trello-like", its appeal to non techies.
It's probably not (currently) checking the cert validity because the huge majority of STARTTLS certs, unlike HTTPS certs, are self-signed, so a slightly brave but maybe not that brave attacker could allow STARTTLS but MITM the connection with its own self-signed cert.
You can't comment like this on HN. Please post civilly and substantively, or not at all.
Maybe Bill just memorized a few digits. So for joe it would be abc for sam it would be dab. Given he probably a had a few 100 employees 26^3 a hash collision would not be as likely.
>Is there anything we can do to protect ourselves from, say, posting something into a HN forum? Or any chat program? Or FB chat, etc...?

TLS or other encryption. However, if they [UCOP, vendor, other] get your key(s) they will be able to read archived traffic.
I tested it with some of my own code, 8 threads making requests to my server at localhost.

Does this program 'wrk' re-establish a connection for each request, or is it re-using them?
How to use LLVM C API with Swift [pdf]
They can lie to psychiatrists to get a temporary commit which is what happened in both of those cases, and yet again you link to something that only shows a few day temporary hold; that does not support your case. You cannot commit someone for more than a few days against their will and that fact alone demonstrates that psychiatrists do not have very much power anymore.
You're right. I misread that. Upon reconsideration, I think it's the author interpreting Pampush that way.
What inspired your 6 year old son to memorise 300 digits of pi?
I'm a bit shocked that I need to be surveilled by absolutely everybody. It's bad enough my government does it, but at least the conversation starts with the fact that they're spies by profession. Now my college needs to surveil my online activities?

I'm not the president of a major university, but how is this justified in the least?
There is an API, it's just not documented yet. It is very simple to use, similar to Slack's API.

The source will be released to companies running Skadi on their own servers, just like JIRA.
Living for centuries would be absolutely awful. Death is necessary. It's the world's chnge-agent. Think about how slow the rates of social progress would be without death.

Also the fact that life is only a fleeting moment in time is beautiful and again, I believe necessary.
The continuation of safe harbour required substantial legal reform, by one side or the other. The legislative deadlines for that passed long ago.

We have to question whether the US could have done anything. The real issue seems to be pervasive unlawfulness in the US. What assurance is any new law when various agencies have demonstrated histories of breaking them so casually? I think it will take a generation or more before Europeans have any trust in US privacy laws.
I VPN to a trusted host (colo) when on airbears2/calvisitor.
Intel SGX Explained [pdf]
No relationship between chronic consumption of caffeinated products and ectopy
Napolitano's decision was probably one of those that sounded good in theory until people found out about it.

If I was a professor I'd want to work somewhere where I feel safe and secure because it's eerie having someone standing over your shoulders, let alone 24/7.

You mentioned intellectual freedom which is a feeling of security. I find that feeling misleading in the US with the NSA's new data center in Utah collecting our information.

Still it would be wise of Napolitano to reverse course but I think it's unlikely given her background.
It's a good subject, but the article neglects that the reason for the fuse is the rather high current "ring main" which was a copper-saving measure.

If you don't need the fuse in the plug, the Schuko plug is pretty nice too.
Do you use the video gestural interpreter input option https://vimeo.com/7133810 ? It really helps keep you in good shape. Kind of a "Code Code Revolution!"
Decorator Design Pattern – Decorating Objects
No one said it proves anything, but nice dodge on your bad English.
What key size and cipher suite are you using? (If you're willing to post the URL, we can have a much more informed discussion, but a sanitized copy of an SSL Labs test or even of `openssl s_client -connect localhost:443` is also workable.)

Also, what hardware are you using? This site is aimed more at companies who fear of losing business because their site is slow, than people hosting a blog on a home server; if you don't have hardware-accelerated crypto (like most server-class machines have, whether or not you explicitly looked for it) its argument is less valid.
The top 0.1% has a lot more wealth than you're giving credit for.
I think you're mistaken about DTD, they were used in SGML. (As in XML they were optional.)