skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Easy: just provide a certificate that cannot be changed within FF (must be modified by changing a file in the installation directory). No preference needed.

This would allow developers to roll their own, and organizations to allow their custom policy as well (which could mean that the privileges of the user himself aren't sufficient to change the cert).

There's really no reason as of why this couldn't be implemented properly. There' also no reason to not include a switch for it, really. This is all just smoke: most users have the privileges to change the FF binary, meaning that in most contextes malware has too (either through social manipulation or through exploits).
someone changed the credentials, you can create your free account on v2.wallabag.org
The author is a kernel developer. He cowrote DTrace and worked at Sun as a kernel developer while they developed Zones and ZFS. I don't see how a kernel guy could only see programs from a high level.
What disingenuous horseshit. Google hires engineers in Australia because the engineers it needs are in places like Australia, London and Silicon Valley. It's rot to present this as some sort of public benefit when it's pure self-interest on the part of Google.

Google in Australia has benefitted from the security and institutions of Australian society, thus it should contribute to them.
When did supply-side economics become a core tenet of feminism?
I think it's worth trying. I'm not confident that it would be faster, but perhaps a SAT-solver would be able to more efficiently prune the search space meaning fewer random accesses.
wow nice your fork! Did you see that we released a new android version few months ago?
Not inside the container. Containers are transparent to the host (Zones especially). You have tooling in the kernel, and you take coredumps when a container process dies.
I'm not disagreeing with you - I actually agree that this is a big problem with the system, but I believe most outsiders have no idea that there is any phonetic connection between the characters.
Does it still default to "flat volume" active?
a video i watched (which, i can't for the hell of me, remember the url or name), explained that the difference between the EU and the USA is that of national identity. People in the USA doesn't bat an eye when federal funds are sent to states whose revenue is below the national average. There's no ethos where a 'they' and 'us', unlike in the EU.
On the Google sync servers, that's the trick.
It wasn't until I had children of my own that I realized just how UTTERLY EGREGIOUS sexism is in the toy industry. When people talk about needing to tackle inequality at every point along the pipeline, this is where that pipeline starts.

I understand the argument behind "vote with your dollars", but when an entire industry is on the wrong side of the issue how can you possibly "vote"?

(BTW, as unlikely as it might seem, we've found the best gender neutral toys are at Ikea.)
Took me a while to find this but https://github.com/wekan/wekan/wiki/Install-and-Update contains the instructions to install
As pointed out in another comment, there are no tests. Developer confidence doesn't matter at that point. You can help them out at https://github.com/wekan/wekan/issues/467
> so why can't they just offer a build with unsigned extensions allowed in a similar way?

From the article that you are commenting on

> at which point unbranded builds based on [...] release will be provided for testing.

The article was 3 paragraphs long.
> Throughout human history, the old have subsidised the young. In rich countries, however, that flow has recently started to reverse. Ronald Lee of the University of California, Berkeley, and Andrew Mason at the University of Hawaii measured how much people earn at different ages in 23 countries, and how much they consume. Within families, intergenerational transfers still flow almost entirely from older to younger. However, in rich countries public spending favours pensions and health care for the old over education for the young.

Speaking in broad strokes (i.e. I'm sure there are plenty of individual examples to the contrary) the baby boom generation is the most selfish generation in recent history, voting to cut taxes and benefits for government and societal services after they had gotten their full use out of them.

http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/yes-summer-job-paid...

> What really made me feel ancient is that the 1981 UW student guide shows the Med school charged only $1,029 a year back then. Today: $28,040!

> The reason a summer at KFC could pay for a year of UW med school in 1981 isn’t that we were so hardworking and industrious. It’s that taxpayers back then picked up 90 percent of the tab. We weren’t Horatio Algers. We were socialists.

> Today, the public picks up only 30 percent of UW tuition, and dropping.

Imagine what would happen if young people actually voted.
I agree on the form (SpaceX is much more open and less advertish about its tries) and on how late BO is compared to SpaceX' technology.

But I feel that would be OK if BO hadn't mentioned space tourism in the past.

First, getting an assessment of how safe this "holiday travel trip" is compared to going to some exotic place by plane requires a hundred times the number of tests they have made. Compare their two runs to the number of kilometers that Google has driven their autonomous cars.

According to Wikipedia, in 2006, they claimed to go commercial in 2010, which tells me they are phenomenally overoptimistic. In the case of space exploration, this is really, really dangerous. Were they to go commercial too soon, a catastrophe implicating civilians could cause a space exploration winter.

Musk's vision is more rational. First, control as much of the solar system as possible while putting as few human lives at risk as possible, then, when civilians can live sustainably in another planet, orchestrate a colonization.

One part of the article that gives me hope is this:

> We’re already more than three years into development of our first orbital vehicle.

Hopefully, they'll focus on that instead.
Open Source, Gamers, and BitCoin: The War on Spontaneous Global Organization
When it comes to eBooks, Marvin for iOS has a great system where you can easily select/highlight entire sentences. If I want to add a note, I choose the highlight and annotate option and then dictate to siri what my note is. That works pretty well, and I can then easily export highlights and annotations to email (and then another system).

For pdf's I use Goodreader, and the same annotation technique.

Still not ideal though. I would be very interested in an app where I can highlight text and immediately dictate (or record) comments without an extra tap...
> In my opinion, the European Council and the Council of the European Union should be replaced by a body elected directly by either the European Parliament, or in some way, the European population.

The EU is never going to work because its people are too different, they don't speak the same language, don't have the same culture and its citizens aren't that mobile (good luck finding a job in France if you don't speak french, good luck expending your business to Germany if you don't understand the German market and law, thinking that the EU can copy the US in anyway is a huge mistake). We have already seen that with each crisis ( the Greek crisis, the refugee crisis ... ) that it is still everybody for himself and rightfully so. Mind you i'm not anti-european, I was fine with the EEC, the EU is an experiment and us citizens are the guinea pigs.
LendUp Scores $150M for a Credit Card That Won't Screw You Over
Yeah when I think of selling female action figures I immediately make the leap to murder.
RFC 793 shouldn't have been so strong as to say that the "reserved field MUST be zero". If I was trying to implement the standard, I would consider such a packet invalid in the same way that a packet with an invalid checksum is invalid. You can't use such strong language and then blame implementations for taking such language seriously.
They blocked Rey with a lighsaber for 1 month so as not to spoil the movie, is the story I've heard, and it seems reasonable. By the way BB8 is female.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/film/star-wars-the-force-awakens/...
The end of argument
8-minute resume: my guide to writing your resume effectively
Fermi paradox resolved: The aliens are silent because they’re dead
One dedicated Fedora legal liason (2007-2013)
Planet Nine from outer space
CP violation is a necessary component, but it doesn't completely explain the whole matter-antimatter asymmetry.

We still haven't ever observed a process that doesn't conserve baryon or lepton numbers, which is another crucial component.
It's great that there is such a strong interest in secure communication, but all of the solutions that keep getting placed in the limelight in recent years are either centralised or exclusively available for use with a smartphone (because of the phone number requirement), often both!

I'm sure that these solutions are a lot more secure than completely unprotected alternatives, but am I wrong in assuming that if you want secure and private communications, the following principles must be met at the least?

* The protocol used must be open, standardized and implementable by others

* Widely endorsed by cryptography experts

* An implementation must be available and developed as free and open source software

* End-to-end encryption is used for the contents of the conversations, private keys do not leave the user's computing device

* The protocol must not have any technological barriers that prevent an implementation from working on any modern operating system (i.e., a phone number is not required)

* The protocol must allow for a complete communications network (clients and servers) to be implemented without the need for centralised third-party services

(The last point probably implies federation.)

For e-mail, OpenPGP meets these requirements. For chat, XMPP has Off-The-Record messaging.

Some of the above points are hostile towards any party that creates secure communications tools with the intent of growing a large user base for economic purposes. Call me a sceptic, but this is probably why use of these protocols and principals is limited to security experts and software developers who understand these principles — for anyone betting on creating the next WhatsApp in one of the mobile walled gardens embracing the whole list means risking losing your potential advertising eyeballs to alternatives.

Of course, there is also the matter of infrastructure. A lot of people expect to be able to use these tools for free, but that implies that someone is paying for the hosting of (relay) servers.
Median yearly household income across US states varies by less than a factor of two in nominal dollars, not accounting for differences in land prices or cost of living. (Mississippi = $37k ... Maryland = $70k) Mississippi has a <7% unemployment rate, down from a peak of about 11% in 2010. Compare to a Greek unemployment rate of 26%.

There are certainly many poor rural people in the US who get screwed over by the society at large, just like there are many poor urban people who get screwed over by society, but that’s a different set of problems that federal transfers to keep states afloat doesn’t necessarily fix.

(I agree though that it would be nice if we in the US had a more effective set of social support systems to help individual struggling families. It would also be nice if we had stronger labor protections, a higher federal minimum wage, etc.)
> Let me ask you a simple question - who gets to decide what stuff should or should not be shoved down people's throats?

The people whose throats they are being shoved down, i.e., the consumers. Right now you have a situation where Rey action figures are unavailable to consumers who want to buy them, because some marketing executives thought they knew what people wanted better than the people themselves.

Did you even read the headline? (I'm not even going to ask about the article.)
Lol, For all the research, disney doesn't understand the market. This isn't the 1970s. Little boys don't want female characters. That's not odd. It's the difference between playing with "action figures" and "dolls". Disney's market research with little boys would show this. But star wars fans are not little boys. Most of them, myself included, are well over the age where girls are "icky". We want to see girls/women/heroines represented. For us these are not toys but collectables.

Disney is also in a tough spot re depictions of female characters. Any 3d/toy depiction will subject them to complaints re body type. A gold-bikini leia is not acceptable today, but any distinctively female profile will be judged harshly. The real character/actress may be a traditional rail-thin model, several inches shorter and 1/2 the weight of her male counterparts. That's what sells tickets. But that same profile in an action figure will be judged harshly. I understand why they might want to avoided the debate.
JOHN MCAFEE: The Obama administration doesn't understand what 'privacy' means
Very much so.

It is a bit disingenuous to imagine sustained life in space when we can barely live sustainably on the overwhelming majority of the surface of Earth. At least on Earth, we don't encounter the physical limitations that our bodies have when exposed to zero gravity, like loss of bone and muscle.
I'm curious if he's required to inform them of any men he plans to have sex with.
This article is written for VC-funded startups of the type that Paul Graham talks about. Why is that an issue?

"he is saying that no matter what, if you have raised money, you should shut your company down if you are within 2 months of insolvency. Which I think goes back to my original point that you only shut down when you lose faith."

The article very clearly explains that if you are within 2 months of insolvency, you need to shut down in at least the sense of firing all your employees, because otherwise you run the risk of not being able to pay salaries or taxes, which is illegal. Having faith has nothing to do with this - faith doesn't pay salaries.
> You've made a very serious mistake, and that's to think that all peoples are the same.

You're making the mistake to think that "peoples" are a monolith. They are much less so than racists. Which, regardless of other problems that need to be addressed, should have a priority of not being given one inch. We should have learned that the hard way, and now again this rhetoric is trying to weasel its way into everywhere.

Say what you want, wish what you want, but it changed nearly nothing for the people who wanted to help before. Those who didn't were obstructing before and are exploiting it now. They just got louder and more violent, not more correct.
Intention or not...

"The BE-4 is our fourth-generation liquid rocket engine, made to take us into orbital space and beyond. Using the latest design and manufacturing techniques, it’s made for both commercial and government missions."

https://www.blueorigin.com/technology#engine_stories_2
It doesn't really make much sense. Even if the toys were only bought for boys, and even if they strongly wanted Kylo Ren characters, there are many significant interactions between Rey and Kylo Ren in the movie. Why would they not want to be re-enacting those?
The future of Human/robots interactions
Yes, according to the config file `src/daemon/daemon.conf.in` in the tarball.
As a Canadian, this scares me. The only outcome I can imagine of such a union is that the American states would bully our politics to an even greater degree.
not to mention having made most of his cash with insider trading in Germany.
> Not on iOS

Tried just now. It does require it and doesn't work without it.

Sorry!

Signal requires access to your
contacts. We do not store your
contacts on our servers.

[Give access]
Greece was loan-sharked by Germany and other "investors" for the explicit purpose of pumping up German exports and making German shareholders happier.

This is not quite the same thing as taking a lot of other people's money.

A lot of the money never reached the ground, so most of the Greek people got very little benefit from it. Rather a lot of it went on defence boondoggles. See e.g.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/apr/19/greece-military...
Uber’s march across America’s regulatory landscape
Zozz
Survive from the extreme winter and snowfall guide
I am in your exact situation right now and I also am 24year old.
alternative title for this post: "rolling your won crypto and smoking it too"
Wait. The moon affects the tides?

Great to see the Daily Fail at the forefront of scientific research like this. Huzzah!
Why not get to the root of the problem? An education should not cost that much. Much of the reason the cost has outpaced inflation is the subsidizing of the tuition price paid by the student instead of making the process of educating less costly by using technology.

Imagine what would happen if a degree was about what you know, not just a credential.
Not a reliable source but more plausible then what is being speculated ITT:

>The sale stalled over the transfer of semiconductor technology involved in making LEDs, a device that emits light, one person familiar with the situation said last year.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-01-22/philips-sc...
Greece got loans at lower interest rates than Germany was paying at the time. That's not what "loan sharking" is.
That compares things location wise, but it misses out entirely on comparing the speeds, the difference of speed is a huge element in comparing the two efforts, in fact it is the distinguishing factor.
Aren't builds typically reproducible? What makes builds non-reproducible? I know the Debian folks are very enthusiastic about reproducible builds, and for a huge system I can see that things can vary -- but what tends to be varying in the case of individual components? If I build a library from the same revision of a source tree I expect the exact bits to come out, if the same compiler version was used? When does it not?

Is it a problem with C/C++ in particular, where toolchains are complex? Or would non-reproducible also be a problem e.g for a Java library?

Googling reproducible builds mainly gets you Debian info, not a general description of the issue
> Mind you i'm not anti-european, I was fine with the EEC, the EU is an experiment and us citizens are the guinea pigs.

Exactly. I love Europe but detest the European Union, the globalist behemoth that should be torn down and replaced by a lightweight treaty for economic, defense and cultural collaboration only.
Because these managers put personal preferences above shareholder value? They won't remain managers for very long at that rate.
So, what is 5G anyway?
> An operating system is a collection of things that don't fit into a language. There shouldn't be one.

~ Daniel Ingalls, co-creator of Smalltalk http://web.archive.org/web/20070213165045/users.ipa.net/%7Ed...
The Constitution Revisited
> a good answer to key management

The problem with key management is that everyone tries to solve the management problem with a single solution. A single method will always have to make choices about the threat model, which can only truly be known by the user. A single user can even have more than one threat model, depending on what they are doing.

What we need instead is some sort of configurable layer that allows the user to specify how keys should be managed by selecting what they want to trust.

They could use a default delegation to a public trust root (the PKI model, no configuration needed) for most things. Receiving a call from the bank could instead be authenticated with the key they got when they physically walked into the local branch. Chat with their immediate friends who can exchange keys on their phone when they meet up in person is easy, and a web of trust can extend that to a friend-of-a-friend. People understand the concept of vouching for someone, and over time more than one method can be used to cross-check.

Key management shouldn't be "PKI vs web-of-trust vs out-of-band-keybase-style vs manual-key-exchange vs ..."; it should be "all of the above, with the chain-of-trust exposed". Anything else is making assumptions about what the user's current needs.
Going underground: A man who tried living as a badger, a deer, and a fox
Political fringes of all colors are against EU by necessity. Their ideas and principles can't blossom otherwise.
An anonymous source... must be gospel.
I'm curious where bow drills fit into this progression? They appear easier to make because you don't need to drill a hole through a rock; you just need a dimpled rock as top bearing. Also, isn't pressing down with a bow drill making more friction so faster fires?
To be fair, not everyone is suggesting you need a scripted build system, but you do need some sort of build step, because <script> tags just aren't sufficient for anything beyond a trivial app. (Also ultimately, you do need to minify your code for production).

This build step can just be 'browserify main.js -o bundle.js'. This is where I suggest people start or go back to if they are intimidated by all the various options.
yet, if what he says makes sense, should we really disregard it because he's rich?

This is somewhat like the conspiracy theorists that assume bill gates charity only exists to make him more money.
I had to enter a captcha yesterday for the first time at their page. I think they are under a DDOS attack.
Here's the money quote (literally):

> "maintain the sharp boy/girl product division"

You're assuming what they're doing is unprofitable and irrational. But a majority of families with two or more children have children of opposite sexes and a cultural taboo against different sexes sharing the same toys means parents need to buy more toys. It isn't hard to believe that this strategy is profitable on net.

So it's really showing the other thing -- not that the market isn't efficient, but that it can be efficient/profitable for the market to be sexist.

But that makes the analogous thing in tech that boys are encouraged to be programmers and girls are encouraged to be nurses. Which is a thing that happens predominantly in schools and at home and it isn't clear how the software industry would be a beneficiary of that -- which is perhaps why we hear many calls to do something about it. The profit-seeking behavior is to change it.
well France declared a yogurt maker in the national interest
Ever since I've discovered 3D fractals, 2D ones simply don't cut it for me anymore.

Unfortunately they are much harder to calculate.

http://blog.hvidtfeldts.net/index.php/category/mandelbulb/
A build is not reproducible where it incorporates both open and closed code. A company may "open source" some important stuff (encryption algorithms) but keep enough code closed that the final build cannot be duplicated from the "open" code. It is therefore difficult to judge whether the open code has actually been adopted properly, or whether any closed code hasn't created new bugs.
Unspecified right now but lower latency and better support for more devices connected without degrading performance. LTE currently needs to slice down the 300Mbit it can achieve per sector by the number of connected devices. It can chose though how it allocates hat bandwidth on a per device basis.
> Right now you have a situation where Rey action figures are unavailable to consumers who want to buy them

What are you talking about? How did you arrive to the conclusion that they are unavailable? http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3D...

> because some marketing executives thought they knew what people wanted better than the people themselves.

Isn't that pretty much what marketing is in the first place?
I want to be a devops
2% of GNI is a trivial sum in comparison to the scale of fiscal transfers between US states.

In poorer US states, about 10% of gross state product is collected as federal taxes, whereas something like 20–30% of gross state product comes to those states through various federal spending.