skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
A better question would be "What's the least bad for my situation?"

Are you a brand new business, or mid sized, or at a large corporation? Each of these use cases have CRM programs that fit that niche; as well as what data you want to retain, flexibility of the system and their API's and a host of other use cases.

SugarCRM seems to be the heavyweight when it comes to the DIY/Startup crowd.
InfusionSoft is more of an SMB or Midsized Business program, allowing for by organization purchasing, instead of by seat, which can be helpful.
Microsoft CRM is great if you're a heavy Windows environment, but performs poorly on OS's outside the Microsoft walled garden (although that is supposed to change a bit with CRM 2016).
SalesForce has some of the best plug-in integration, so if you want a solution that probably will integrate with your other marketing software rather seemlessly you'll find none better.
SAP & RightNow tech (both under the Oracle umbrella now) are the heavy hitters, allowing for large, complex organizations with expansive and diverse customer bases to be able to handle CRM aspects rather seemlessly.

Hope this helps a bit.
"I didn't have time to actually make or keep a budget, or learn anything about the topic, so I spent six months writing an app that is basically Mint, but slightly prettier, and worse." Don't ever change, tech dudes!
Most recruiters make their placing fee within 90 days of placing their candidates, so for most of us, I would consider 3 months or less to be too soon. (That said, new agencies pop up daily, so finding someone else to place you isn't hard.)

Six months? You're fine. I left my job at Google within 8 months and didn't have an issue landing an awesome gig. (I got a lot of questions for it though)
Considering we're on a topic that is complete fantasy anyway, you could just rebudget the FCC. They aren't getting paid 3 billion a year of magic money - they are being funded effectively by the users of the networks that buy the spectrum in their bills they pay to the carrier.

Obviously we can look at the FCC and know it will not actually break up the spectrum monopolies, because its a conflict of interest. That doesn't change that privitization of radio waves is hostile to everyone but those who can exploit their ownership for profit.
Sure, I got that. I edited my comment to not mention it so as to avoid distraction from my main argument.
Not only that, it's cheaper: $300 for the Remix Ultratablet (64 GB) and $350 for the equivalent Surface 2 on Amazon.
SpaceX Launch You Up (Uptown Funk Parody)[video]
Just a small heads up: Swisscom is the ex-monopolist and very anti net-neutrality and even went as far as to dream about demanding money from startups who want priority of their data.
The ones that jumped out at me as I read:

"public communication tickets"
"bot so healthy"
"You probably realised taht you won’t be able to makea cut" (2 in one)

"I go o the grocery"
Are not all the local variables allocated on the stack in the function prologue anyway? no matter where in the function they are defined. A typical function starts with subtracting the stackpointer to make space for the local variables if i'm not mistaken.
Ah yes I forgot to write the "in var/let" part which was supposed to be there.

That is you can only use refutable patterns in `switch` (and `if let`/`while let` though I believe those are still restricted to Option, not general-purpose as in Rust, that correct?). In Erlang you can use a refutable match in an "assignment", that's basically a pattern assertion, a more general-purpose version of Swift's forced unwrapping.
15 content marketing myths to leave behind in 2015
People really care about this stuff.

Hopefully enough people care about this to influence the FCC before T-Mobile meets them on January 15th to discuss their Binge On program as per: http://arstechnica.com/business/2016/01/t-mobiles-video-thro...
On-topic but not for this particular company...

What is an ideal host for privacy? Been doing research for a potential security product and that particular question is one of the still-open problems to be solved.
Across the company we use all of them, because our enterprise clients all have different needs. For this deal we use OpenVZ, with our own proprietary workload balancing algorithm that migrates containers so that each gets optimal performance.
I love YNAB and would love to use it in the cloud. It's a shame that it is isn't up to snuff yet and is $45/year. It would be great if someone came out with a cloned competitor.
Hi there, I am the co-founder of saas.do. Let me get to your questions.
1. Api access: yes, there will be one so you can trigger workflows. All entities have automatically REST API. Your even are able to configure which entity have the API enabled.

2. Batch data loads: We have a data import feature for excel right now. I imagine to have other data types like csv, sql. Via the API batch data loads will be possible.

3. Permission: There different levels for permission handling. For fields of an entity you are able to set group permissions. On the entity level you are able to set also group permissions and tenancy scope. For the UI builder you can set permission on single elements and components. A row, a container a table a chart etc.

4. Analytics: Right now we have a basic analytics module. You are able to map chart types with entities and add those to your custom view which you can create with the UI builder.

If you have any questions, just bump me a line.

Cheers,
Wow, the real (rhs) images have so much more of an "emotional" appeal. Somehow the middle images, while I admire the tech, really don't add much to the black and white, and they might even take something away. They seem much too tentative, washed out, averaged. I would argue that in general, they're the worst out of the three.
Let us define the Identity Property of Being as 'being at one with oneself'.

Given that: time = money

...and that 'Time is All We Have'. [1]

...we can write: time/time = money/money

Which is equivalent to: (time)(money) = (money)(time)

Dividing everything by money^2 give us: time/money = time/money

Since we know that: time = money

...we can write: time/money = money/money

Which is: time/money = 1

So, we have shown that valuing time over money results in the Identity Property of Being.

[1] https://youtu.be/IAqgvotGrsg
False. There is no "sustainable tourism" if it requires you to fly a long distance to get there.
> I think that Rust simplifies some things that you must do yourself in C++, and learning how to do them is valuable.

Given that you didn't answer the question, I think it's pretty clear at this point that you haven't used Rust. Rust is a low-level language with low-level control over memory and resources.
This is incorrect, `int array[10] = {1}` initializes all but the first element with 0.
- Little R&D cost: steal everything not bolted down

- Cheaper overhead: the company is run in China, not the US

- No middleman: ship from China to customer, not from China to US to customer

That's all I can think of. Maybe they sell their products at lower profit margins since they know they will get more wholesale orders.
I'm pretty sure the land I'm standing on will take a few billion years to disintegrate.
Lets not forget the huge amount of water wasted on growing feed for livestock. Its ridiculous how much less water farmers would need if they grew crops from human consumption rather than cows (and yes, some cows craze on open land for food, but that has plenty of other issues associated with it).
Well, T Mobile also is the first carrier to do away with subscriptions which I support. Sure, I don't agree with everything they do but as far as I can tell they are the most agreeable of the bunch.
New technique can help us understand signaling direction of brain networks
I don't think you get to compare those living the high life with Elon Musk. He gives me the impression that he'd rather re-invest every last cent he has into new projects than that he'd ever splurge 10's of millions on himself.

Branson and Jobs for instance own (and owned) huge boats that they had built especially for them and spend(t) lavish amount of money on themselves, their houses and so on.

Instead of building a boat for himself Elon Musk decided to back Tesla.

The Rockefellers and Ford are of a different era, hard to compare their wealth and what they did with it back when they made it with todays world. Disney doesn't even belong in that list (for me).
Kinda. Reading my comment a second time, I'm not exactly happy with my description, since while it's 'right' is a very simplistic description, ignoring some of the finer points.

Since malloc/calloc are generally used for smaller allocations, the chances you can actually avoid allocating some pages you ask for is pretty slim since a bunch of objects get placed into the same page (And thus writing to any of them will trigger a new page being allocated). There's also no guarantee there isn't headers for malloc to make use of, or similar surrounding your piece of memory, which makes the point moot - Just using malloc triggers writes to at least the first page. So while calloc/malloc are kinda compatible with lazy-allocation, you really shouldn't rely on it being a thing, and it probably won't matter.

It's worth understanding, but the chances it actually comes into play aren't huge. If your program does lots of small malloc's and free's, then it basically won't matter because you won't be asking the kernel for more memory, just reusing what you already have.

If you care about taking advantage of lazy-allocation for one reason or another, the bottom line is probably that you shouldn't be using malloc and calloc for that then. Just use mmap directly and you'll have a better time - more control, you have a nice page-aligned address to start with, and you can be sure the memory is untouched. malloc and calloc are good for general allocations, but using mmap takes out the guesswork when you have something big and specific you need to allocate.
If you use that kind of measure, I guess we'll all have to create our own countries to make sure we don't use services from a country that once had a company with bad practices?
Where I live (Massachusetts), the solar companies have started getting really aggressive with sales. Going door-to-door and camping out at the local home improvement store. Smells a lot like trying to get installs while the getting is still good.
How does this trend play into California's new law that aims at 50% energy from renewable energy by 2030? Seems anti-competitive.
You'll always find people who are better than you in any area you care to look. It's just part of life - it can hurt, especially if it's in a field you try very hard to be good at - but we need to learn to live with it.

My advice: stop comparing yourself to others. Rather, focus on how far you personally have already come and how far you can still go.
God @#$& developers redirect to mobile site if you use the shortened share link on a smartphone... and they drop your deep link.
Not a comment about whether it is an add, but Blinq is already a crowded name, you may want to think up something unique. There was a dating app with AI hot or not ratings here just a day or two ago with the same name, not to mention the discount website that already has blinq.com.
>> Standing eliminates post-lunch lethargy, for me

I quit drinking sugary drinks for that.
> gates is probably the great living human being.

I'm sorry, I remember a totally different Bill Gates all too well. I'd definitely not list him as 'the greatest living human being'.
Appodeal Receives Over $3M to Grow Its ProgrammaticAd Mediation Solution
I like the idea of REST as a language-agnostic datasource; adhering to conventions facilitates this.
It's a lot more complicated than that. My friend ran a reselling company back during the CPanel days and he broke down his pricing structure. For hosting, profit is almost always a direct function of the level of plan if they're priced without specials and you assume the transfer was used to capacity(which was the largest expenditure during that era, by far -- hardware and 1.5 amps to each unit was negligible). Things were different since this was before the advent of bittorrent, dropbox, and ones ability to get 100mb fibre drops to the home from Verizon, but I think he mentioned ~80% of his COGS was bandwidth and unpredicted expenditures (i.e., server maintenance by a tech-- this was when KVM-over-IP units were like $200/mo).

His customers fell into a variety of groups though. Some people wanted to host their own domain/mail (again, this was before Gmail), so their consumption was negligble and despite being on the lowest tier, his margins were huge. Then you'd have people who'd take the middle-tier deal where the margins were bigger, but people (like my friends and I in high school) would host-jump and max out or bandwidth every month until they TOS'ed us (unfairly, might I add). I'd speculate there might be quite a few people who buy the lowest deal because it's the cheapest, never log in, and fail to cancel it out of lethargy as it's like 4 dollars a month (i.e., the "Godaddy upsell"). Who knows though.
> Windows is a primitive development platform out of the box

I think it'd be hard to argue that a fresh, clean install of windows isn't an absolutely primitive development platform.

Not that I think it's too relevant of an argument in this discussion, as no developer runs an "out of the box" install as a dev platform, but countering arguments that were never made doesn't seem too productive.
Hi, thanks for your interest in it.

This project has been released to exchange some ideas and collect feedback from the OCaml and JavaScript communities.
It is still in an very early stage and more like research projects though we already had some good results.

Note that ocamlscript is inspired from typescript and js_of_ocaml, we like the readability of typescript
generated js code, while don't want to loose the expressivity of a powerful langauge, ocaml, here in particular.

The main difference from js_of_ocaml is that js_of_ocaml maps the whole bytecode
program into a js file while ocamlscript maps an ocaml module to es6 module.

Indeed, there is some difference in the runtime representation between js_of_ocaml and ocaml, for example, ocamlscript uses
js string and array for ocaml string and arrray(we do this since we want an optimal js output at the price of a bit runtime incompability),
this may make interaction between js_of_ocaml and ocaml a bit harder, but that's exactly why we made an early release to hear what other people may think.
js_of_ocaml is an excellent project and we learned a lot from it and will seek some collaborations to share some workload.
It said "paper bag" :-)
How MSG Got a Bad Rap
The solar power is inherently less valuable to the grid than the wholesale power it can get from on-demand variable-output plants, or even the wholesale power it gets from always-on baseload power plants.

If they are forced to buy the uncontrollably variable distributed solar energy, it will be at the expense of the peaking plant, and possibly even the baseload plant, if there is a large enough gap between peak solar production and peak energy consumption.

So it should pay, at most, the price it would have otherwise paid from the power plants if distributed small-time solar installations weren't forcing their excess production back onto the grid.

That means paying less than wholesale. So those solar installations end up paying a bit for the service of using the grid a like a storage battery--as they should.

If you're going to demand equal compensation for your solar power as the peaking power plant, you will have to install equipment on your end that allows the grid to control how much power it chooses to buy from you. Otherwise, it's like haggling over the price of a meal that is already eaten.
that's simply wrong. FxOS for phones didn't fail and Mozilla knows whats going on. Maybe some bad communication and PR, that's sad.
Here is something really hilarious, USA didn't sign the Bern convention on copyright until the 1980s.

More and more it feels like USA internationally right now is a rerun of Victorian England.
You asked for names, you got names. Nobody said anything about how they should spend their money.
As someone who was born in Soviet Union, and (thankfully) escaped at a fairly early age, arguments like this just completely boggle my mind.

Why do people think it's ok to take other people's money? If a billionaire has money - regardless of whether they earned or inherited it - it's THEIR money. If they earned it lawfully, they should pay the same % of tax that everyone else pays - and keep the rest to do whatever they please. Who are YOU to tell them how to spend THEIR MONEY better?

If you're jealous of them having more money than you - this is a truly free country, nothing is stopping you from earning just as much as they have. Yes, life isn't fair, they may be born into wealth and you're not - but try being born in North Korea, then talk about it not being fair.

This is the principle that America was founded on, and what's allowed it to be successful.

And as someone who studied just a bit of history, it seems completely insane to me that people think taking money from the rich and distributing it to the poor think it will turn out OK. The same exact thing happened in dozens of socialist countries - those that are in charge of the distribution, somehow distribute the most of it to themselves, and then take away people's freedoms so they would stay in power. To think that something else is going to happen is just plain ignorance of basic human nature.
No, it means that there is a way with which you can verify whether you can trust or not.

Yes, I understand how you meant it. By I really can't understand ordinary people can even come to "your" conclusion. How can people be so stupid (sorry for my harsh wording) not to be able to understand that a digital signature just means that there exists a possibility to check whether the message is authentic (and this has to be done if necessary) instead of being authentic?
That coupled with deep pocket companies supplying nearly 90% of campaign financing to elected officials narrows the choices to the point the voters can never get a candidate which truly represents their interests.
I'm unfamiliar with "spendings". Does that mean something like "expenditures" or "money spent"?
> but the 97.8% of people didn't respond is by far the more important number.

I think the more helpful baseline is likely the folks that opened the email (we can't infer a lot from the ones that didn't -- email services may have simply junk-mailed the message for the other 54.2%). 27 / 560 is 4.8% which is still not awesome, but it's really not terrible.

1 in 20 people who saw OP question about the service were compelled enough to provide a response. That's not bad.

> If you can't get a significant response from a group who are (allegedly) interested in your type of product then you clearly have a big messaging problem.

I really wouldn't be so down on it. What's the average read-to-recommend on the average unsolicited call to action message? How many people actually provide extra details when an application on our computers crashes and the OS wants to send a bug report?

How many actually send the bug report? That's just a button click.

Providing their email for updates is a good indicator the base pitch is interesting, true. But it's an almost mindless activity. How many times a month does the average technophile give away an email address?

Enough times, is how many. And enough times to likely forget more often than not what they'd signed up for a day ago, let alone continue to really, really care about it.

I'm sure OP could have built a more compelling email campaign that used the right communication strategies to elicit a greater response. But, I'll take 5% over 0.
My only problem with that argument is , by that logic, wouldn't land containing a large deposit of oil or some natural resource be public property. The property given to the public would definitely benefit society as a whole.
I'm far from an expert, but what I've heard about Denuvo's latest generation of DRM tech is pretty clever. The details that have surfaced from their PR and independent analysts is that they're verifying the integrity of the executable and loaded libraries in memory occasionally at runtime. This short-circuits a lot of simple memory-clobbering or library-substitution tricks that crackers use to route around additional vendor-specific DRM solutions added by Steam or Origin.

Coming from the anti-DRM position, I'm pretty impressed because they found a way to verify that the original game is running as intended without impacting the player experience in any observable way. Not my favorite thing from a "you can't modify this thing you bought" perspective, but in terms of making good on the ideal game DRM, it's pretty cool.
This is great.

Reminds me of my first node/angular project http://gymnear.com/
Congratulations on choosing a healthier diet; controlling sugars definitely helps, as well.
I think capitalism has been a zero-sum game for a very long time. Marketing just dominates everything now - 90% of the work people do is to figure out how to make the company that they work for gain market share over the companies that other people work for and the solution these days is usually marketing... Instead of focusing their energy on how to make their product cheaper.

The cost of RAM memory seems to have stagnated. The prices of vital drugs are going up. Property prices are going up.

The era of value-creation is over. The real winners are those who can make other people create all the value and just capture that value.
Lt Col Niranjan Kumar
You could copy and paste it into a word editor. I just did that with MS Word and it highlighted several misspellings for me.

Also in FF, a textarea box will show misspellings.

Or do you not have English dictionaries installed on your PC? (It's hard for me to get in the habit of remembering the internet is world-wide :S )
There is a production tax credit that provides 30% off the system cost that eventually expires.

EDIT: It behooves you to install a solar system on your dwelling sooner than later.
"...not a rocket since but..." -> "...not rocket science but..."?
There is no way to recover from a failed VLA allocation.

Also, VLAs are optional in C11, and may not be supported in otherwise-near-C99 compilers for small processors. (Of course, alloca() is not standard at all.)
Just another millionaire pissing contest. Like college rankings and best cities to live. Makes you anxious if you missed something and changes every year.
The New York Public Library’s release of 180,000 copyright-free images
So, you're saying:

1. DigitalOcean is a good product people trust.

2. They copied everything about it.

3. So, it's a bad product that we can't trust?

What am I missing aside from an ethical argument? If it's operationally like DO, then that's already an argument in it's favor. If it's just appearances, then it's a knock-off that ain't worth shit. I'm ignoring ethics of copying interfaces for now in favor of quality of service as many businesses will. Clearly, the interface will do just fine.
You're assuming these companies create a lot of jobs, but in fact they create far fewer jobs than they did 30 years ago. As Intel founder Andy Grove said (of companies like Apple): "plowing capital into young companies that build their factories elsewhere will continue to yield a bad return in terms of American jobs."

Instagram (for another example) had 13 employees when sold for $1 billion.
Thanks. Like most technically-minded people, I wouldn't be interested in OpenVZ even at $2.99 a month.
I was originally going to list examples of bad industry-focused science in the original post, but decided against it, since I didn't want to offend anyone. Your username is "gradstudent", suggesting you have read a few papers. My bet is that you've read papers where you scratch your head and say, "is that really how things work?" I read lots and lots of those papers - usually they don't end up getting published.