skysight-inc/HackerNews huggingface dataset:
Problem is, your CV should be optimised for the format in which you are looking at it. A Word and PDF version should be no more than 2 sides of A4, with the page break at a logical place. HTML should be interactive, with widgets that show relevant content.

Web design is fundamentally different to print design, and your CV should show that you understand that. So you should be able to make a Word version save that to PDF, then re-write and redesign the content for the web page.
> a standard specified by industry experts and every bootcamp has to follow it

How would anyone force them to follow it? The standard would have to be heavily marketed to prospective students, which would apply pressure on bootcamps to follow the standard. But that would cost money, and who would pay for that?

This is the kind of thing that historically snowballs into a huge mess, and then the government ends up regulating it because there's no way the market will.

See also: accreditation of schools, regulation of food-safety and food-quality practices, etc.

You can also see an industry where the government hasn't regulated that much, which is organic food in the US. That's a huge disaster, where the organic buzzword is applied to a wide variety of products with a wide variety of histories. Consumers have no idea what they're really buying.
> I don't want to impose that privacy failure on my users, but I also don't want to impose the annoyance that is "Sign up with a username, email address, and password".

Why not just 'log in with email address'? The user provides his email address; you send him an email with a URL of the form http://www.invalid/path/to/resource?access_token=aSBkb25lIGF... (where aSBkb25lIGF1dGhlbnRpY2F0ZWQgdGhpcw is a cryptographically-authenticated account identifier). When he follows the URL, you can set a cookie if you want him to be automatically logged in next time he visits your site, or not if you don't.

Extending this to be one-time only (to prevent replay by an email provider) is an exercise for the reader.
The authors of the new storage layer mentioned in the GP are the team that originally wrote BerkeleyDB, which has been used for misson critical workloads for decades. One of the authors actually invented Serializable Snapshot Isolation (SSI), the concurrency control mechanism used in Postgres. If you don't trust them to handle your data, I don't really know who you should trust.
Our website has forums and an issue tracker. Many users do not want to reveal their email address in those contexts.

For a couple of service-oriented sites I'm working on, which won't have forums or public issue trackers, they only use email address (which is change-able). But, it's just not an option for my primary business website.
Almost every single time it came up on HN it was met with FUD or straight out lies about what it was, how it worked and what it was like compared to other login mechanisms.

I distinctly remember, both during development of Persona, and shortly after the discontinuation of it... people who had this BRILLIANT IDEA! They would send a token to your email /every time you wanted to login/.

They repeatedly were lacking in every way to Persona but somehow managed to capture more of peoples' attention.

Actually, congrats, there are several users doing it right here in this thread.
What if for the most part, having entrepreneurial dreams whilst not having access to capital is in fact, stupid? Just because you perceive something as denigrating doesn't make the premise untrue. Stop advocating a safe space; instead have a real counterargument that refutes the claim. For example, we are assaulted with stories like "Theranos" all the time which is the story of yet another ultra-privileged, ultra 1% founding semi-fraudster riding nepotism to the bank whilst the employees are told to "dream" as the co. falls apart...
Moses, utility library for functional programming in Lua
That is one of the most famous LaTeX resume templates, so there's a lot of examples of it online.

Here's one: https://github.com/elizabrock/LaTeX-Resume
I am trying to point out that data science can't be learned in bootcamp. It need at least 2-3 years of work to be employable in industry as data scientist. And what the bootcamps teach in class is pretty basic which anybody can learn for free.

Bootcamp misguide people by telling them that data science is easy and you can learn in 3 months by paying big bucks to them.
In a way its kind of fraud. Think about it if you go to trader's joe and you ask for full toned organic milk and what you get is regular fat free milk (and we don't even know if there is a world where regular fat free milk is free).
Logging with Docker – Part 1.1
Here's one way: once you release something publicly enough it becomes part of our culture. You don't own our culture, any part of it, even if you created some of the art in it. Your work lives in a context surrounded by other works you did not create, and could only have been created as a response to them. That's how art works. So while you have some rights to it, you don't have absolute and complete rights to determine what happens to it after release; it belongs primarily to society now, with a respectful nod towards you. People are free to talk about it, watch it, look at it, listen to it, learn from it in ways you never imagined. And you won't get paid for all of them. Welcome to creating art.
Iron-age Norwegians liked their bling
Why January Is the Best Time for Startups to Recruit Top Talent, and How to Do
The blog post says, "Specifically, I am unaware of any actual data that shows a correlation between raw intelligence, as measured by any of the standard metrics (educational achievement, intelligence tests, or skill at solving logic puzzles) and company success."

That's just an argument from ignorance. According to Hacker News comment karma scores, one of my most popular comments ever was a comment that included a FAQ about what the research shows about company hiring procedures.[1] What the research says is that for hiring workers for any kind of job, a work-sample test and a test of general intelligence are about tied for effectiveness in identifying good job candidates. ALL hiring procedures sometimes miss good workers, and all hiring procedures sometimes result in hiring lousy workers, but if you want to optimize, the way to optimize is to hire workers who are good at doing the specific tasks you are hiring for (that's what a work-sample test shows you) and how have good general cognitive ability, which shows as well as any indicator that they can learn to do new tasks in the future. References to the research literature are available in my previous comment, linked in the footnote. Anything else you do in hiring, for whatever reason, has less benefit to your company than checking whether job candidates can do the job tasks and checking whether the job candidates are smart or dull.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4613543
Jumper, fast, lightweight pathfinding Lua library for grid-based games
Ask HN: Is ASP.NET Worth Learning?
I'm currently learning Rails and Swift. But my Current Job requires me to learn ASP.NET.
I'm reminded of a friends bitch about his company hiring a couple of ex-bell labs video compression guys to develop video codecs. Said they spent a year and came up with a great codec. Decode speed was twice as fast as anything else. Great!! Encoding speed was about a 1000 times slower. So encoding 5 minutes of video would take 3.5 days. And thus totally unusable.

The issue is design axis's are entangled. And also figures of merit are nonlinear. Twice as whatever doesn't mean twice as good.
The year of the Linux desktop never happened because by the time Linux became user friendly enough to install on desktops, the market for desktops had been eclipsed by laptops (and their proprietary chipsets, especially for wifi). By the time Linux caught up on laptops, people had moved on to tablets and phones.

The year of the Linux desktop, arguably, was 2011, when Android 4.0 was released, and brought Android up to the performance standards of iOS.
Perhaps something like having each blob refer to an email message. Each tree would refer to a folder. Each commit would be made whenever an email is added, deleted, or moved to another folder (though it would not have a reference to a parent). For indexing, you could refer to each blob with a tag that had a name that corresponds to a UID. If an email is deleted, then the corresponding tag would be deleted as well.

Git's garbage collection would eventually remove references to orphaned objects and the transfer protocols would only push (or fetch) objects the other repository doesn't have.

I don't know how it would scale in terms of performance though.
Testing is an issue, yes. Making sure my tests are comprehensive, making sure my environment is set up in a way that makes the tests valid (that is, that I'm going through the right code paths) and verifying such, remembering where all the appropriate checklists are ("oh, right, that was testing a Y, I need to do checklist t_Y"). I occasionally have to make an extra commit because I forgot to stage a line or a comment. Stuff like that.

I've largely dealt with it by moving into CS theory and AI (which have less of that) and by using Google's reminders system (inbox, now, keep) to deal with the remainder. Just, whenever I have to do engineering, it's always going to be more difficult for me, and since I'm damn good at math there's no real reason for me to focus on engineering beyond the level where the other things I'm doing don't take hits from it. And unless I manage some kind of transformative pivot or redefinition, it'd be pretty stupid for me to focus on being a great engineer, and I'm not sure I'd be able to. I certainly am never going to be as good an engineer as I could be a computer scientist.
There is a list of what the British government thought would be likely UK targets (pretty much anywhere populated).

[0]http://robedwards.typepad.com/files/probable-nuclear-targets...
Miracle Box Latest Setup
Agreed. This is one of those areas that most mobile developers are better off with a little less rope to hang themselves.

The expression hurry up and wait comes to mind. I would rather have a thread sleeping while it waits for slightly less perceptual performance than a thread spinning and chewing through my battery because it's waiting as fast as it can.
Medium does this, but I'm not a fan because it takes longer than just using a username/password generated with LastPass.
The report mentions Wikipedia.

Wikipedia, the 7th most popular site in the world according to Alexa, reports ( http://stats.wikimedia.org/wikimedia/squids/SquidReportOpera... ) that Ubuntu clients were 0.48% of Wikipedia's web traffic in June 2015 (0.49% in May 2015, 0.49% in April 2015).
I did a similar thing, with the same data. I created a maximizing team, and then some nearby teams. I'm doing slightly net positive (I've turned $200 into a whopping $229.) At this point. I really can't say if this is chance or indicating an advantage
HR XML has a lot of tooling around it: http://www.hropenstandards.org
I've been using Xubuntu exclusively for a few years - just love it for the configurability.

Recent upgrade to 15.10, learning systemd. To my surprise, I really like systemd.

Also have had great experience with Ubuntu on RPi. Now I'd like to try Ubuntu on a phone...
Show HN: Paralyze – a go package that simplifies parallelization
I understand what you wrote. I was asking for specific examples.
I'm referring to section 6.1 of the original paper which very much does exist (PDF page 11).

Not that the Ruby vs Python detour hasn't been amusing, but my core argument can and should have been better stated as: debug builds are slower than release builds and people still use them. Therefore this technology is not dead.
> Doing this is perfectly defined by the standard if X is an unsigned integer, but not if it's signed. That's what doesn't make sense, since they could've made the unsigned case undefined as well.

It does make sense if you understand the historical context: There was a time when some processors still used ones-complement representation for signed integers. That's why the highest performance choice of instructions for signed integer addition would give different results in the overflow case on different processors. Which is why the standard leaves the behaviour undefined, so that compiler writers can choose the instructions that make for the fastest signed addition on the respective target, while programmers can not rely on any specific behaviour.

None of that applies for unsigned integers, and also, the common overflow behaviour of unsigned integers is commonly used intentionally for many types of computations (such as in cryptography), so it is both useful and it doesn't cost anything in terms of performance to define the semantics of unsigned overflow.
> And, I didn't even know it was an option until it stopped being an option.

Not to take away from your overall point, but you can still very much use persona: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Persona (linked from https://login.persona.org/ )
Mate just reinforces why I am bitter toward Ubuntu. Compiz used to be a pretty rad window manager 5-6 years ago. But Ubuntu basically hijacked Compiz as the foundation for Unity, so any Compiz version newer than I think 0.8.x is missing key features and suffering many bugs, if used for any purpose other than to support Unity. If Ubuntu hadn't messed up Compiz so much, then Mate+Compiz would indeed be a viable and happy desktop environment. Fortunately Gnome3 is itself viable now. But I will never get back the many days of really trying to make mainline Ubuntu (and Mint with Cinnamon and Mate) work for me post-Unity (after all it comes with Compiz out-of-the-box! ;) ) and suffering all the stereotypical brokenness for which people deride desktop Linux.
"I think you're underestimating the importance of Facebook information towards making viable free content. The basic, accurate information you receive from the FB SDK really helps salespeople identify qualified leads for trial-to-paid conversions; the info also can be used to tell you what other websites people visit or software they use."

I generally consider this kind of information warehousing and sharing unethical. While I understand the business case for it, and I understand that facebook has permission from their users because of the ToS agreement, I don't want to inflict it on my customers (who are often Open Source and Free software nerds who take their security somewhat seriously). I am a facebook user, but I don't like what facebook does to privacy. Google, same story.

So, I view participating in those login systems as low-grade evil, as it contributes to the incredible stockpile of data facebook and Google have about all of us. I don't make a big deal about it, and I use sites that require it, but I don't have to like it. And, if there were a way for me to provide a similarly nice user experience to my customers without invading their privacy in any way, I would do so.
So, perhaps a different question - Can Mozilla host / bless the mailing list / forum where these successors to persona are discussed, built with volunteers and tried out?
This is something that's doubly frustrating for dedicated autodidacts. For some areas, once you start diving into them (and giving up all of your free time in the process to make any progress), you realize just how much more time is necessary to get to the "baseline" / "start of the art / be able to make a useful contribution (and how useful it is to be in an immersive learning environment surrounded by people you can collaborate with.)

You can easily hit a wall even with all the books and MOOCs at your disposal, due to having to do all your learning after work when you're tired or on weekends.

To have to go into debt in order to work on interesting things is unfortunate; just how many people who could have made interesting contributions in a variety of areas never do so because of that?

Studying yourself into web dev and such is eminently possible, but if you want to do, for example, deep learning work at even one-half the Richard Socher-level, you almost surely need to go for an advanced degree. It might be different if you're a superhuman autodidact rather than just a "standard" one, but there are a lot more of the latter (a set that I include myself in) than the former.
I'm curious if there is a way to scrape the historical roster data, so one could figure out how much variance the other players are getting. On FanDuel you can browse through the other rosters by hand, but the API doesn't appear to let you scrape the entire contest.
Registering Yahoo addresses is actually anything but "simple" anymore.
Larry Wall announces that Perl6 is ready for production
What I'm trying to say is that while it's possible to cure almost any muscle-related injury with exercise and regimen (and the athletes do this all the time), it's not possible to do with a busted joint (and the athletes have to retire prematurely when they realize that having another surgery is not an option).
USPS will often have better access to your building and/or leave small packages in the mailbox, which I appreciate.
If your job is the type where you're on the same team/project for years on end doing basically more of the same thing from month to month, then I can understand why you wouldn't necessarily see the value in this kind of tool.

I update mine once every 2-4 months or so, whenever I complete a project, earn a certification, take a course or work (professionally) with a new technology.

Having 10 different formats does sound a bit like overkill, but I don't think that is a reason that the OP would want to ignore or exclude any that users would find useful. Personally, I keep about 3-4 (linkedin, .doc, .pdf, .htm).
Are you working is Microsoft shop or mixed development skill set for different projects? Learn it would be useful where some projects required building from scratch and tight integration, I'm simply on Javascript where it cover almost everything + photoshoping.

If you plan to work oversea, Singapore, plenty of programmers use either Java or MS technology.
In chemistry class in middle and high school, I thought all the safety precautions we took were stupid, given that we were using harmless chemicals to do harmless experiments. I wish this had been around, and it had been required reading--I would have all about that safety gear.
If they just want to check your website out, why are you forcing them to choose a password anyway?
Beating the point spread wagering on NFL games is also a game of skill then. There are some sports betters who are better at analyzing data than the bookies are who consistently make money.

Very few games that we'd call gambling (e.g. blackjack) are 100% chance though. Maybe dice games? Lotteries? Even in games where the house always has edge, you can lose less by playing optimally.
I don't really see the point in this and this is why: let's say Persona won and all the big ones switched to it (Facebook, Google, Twitter etc.) by becoming providers. Most people would still be using their Facebook, Google or Twitter persona anyway (except for a few privacy sensitive users who don't like SaaS anyway because it's bad for privacy according to them). So we would have a situation that would be de facto very similar to what we have now (3 sigin buttons for facebook, google and twitter) and then an extra one for people using their own hosted provider. This is what happened with OpenID, problem was that supporting people using their own providers became a nightmare as these providers went down or had some incompatibilities. People were just angry they couldn't sign in with their old providers, many of theme may have not even known they were using custom providers or what providers are and the other half would be privacy nerds who enjoy complaining every time their custom provider stops being fully compatible. For app owners, it would just be a big waste of time and resources supporting these users.
I've really embraced Powershell in a big way recently. A fairly expressive language, full backing of .NET, gives you total control of Windows.

I always hated that Windows didn't have a [useful] terminal, cmd doesn't really cut it, but once I realized how deep you can actually go with Powershell, I've integrated it into our companies build process.
Show HN: React, Jeopardy and Speech Recognition
I agree. We're doing this wrong. Airport "free" WiFi wanting to know my date of birth, and cranky weird crap like that.
However, this method can't really be used everywhere -- not all emails are encrypted up to the point where the recipient reads them.
And OP only expressed being surprised or "taken back"[sic] for one OS. Why are we talking about the other OSes?
I just built this to help learn react. It's jeopardy with a list of 180,000 actual jeopardy questions and uses speech recognition for you answers. Unfortunately, it only works on Chrome and Android for the speech recognition.

The repository is here if you'd like to check it out.

https://github.com/dominathan/reactopardy

Some things could use some help, e.g.

1) NLP - better way to score the speech to text input
2) Another library for speech to text that works on all browsers, not webkitSpeechRecognition

Let me know what you think! Criticism and comments all welcome!

Cheers

P.S. Many thanks to egghead for their instructional lessons.
Huawei Y511-U30 Latest Firmware Flash File, Flash Tool
Mac hardware is modestly popular among Linux users.
That's an opinion that not everyone holds, and doesn't necessarily hold for all sorts of people/positions. If you do design-heavy types of work, then it makes a lot of sense to heavily optimize for the format. If not, then that's just window dressing on a format that is used to convey information.

I highly interactive web-based resume for a lawyer or accountant might seem silly in that community (and some of my lawyer/account friends agree).
Rick Milisci Feat ( Alexis Lee ) – You Make Me Happy – CD Baby Music Store
(We detached this subthread from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10788759 and marked it off-topic.)

This comment breaks the HN guidelines. Personal attacks are not allowed here. Your other comments in the thread aren't civil and substantive either, because they're mostly just venting indignation, and in the signal/noise ratio that we care about, that is noise.

It's worth observing that the indignation was out of place to begin with—the OP not only doesn't advocate what you're railing against, he said the opposite and even put it in bold, presumably to ward off misunderstanding. That mismatch is typical of indignation, which usually pre-exists and is waiting for opportunities to vent. In other words, it's really about something else, which is why such comments always feel off-topic even when they don't appear to be. (This is not a personal critcism; I've made many such comments myself and it took a long time to figure out that doing so is not real conversation.)
So what if it's defensive? Perhaps it's reasonable to defend that your OS is one of the most used in the world, when it's not perceived as such?
Ah, gotcha. I misunderstood that one. My bad.

That said, I'm not too sure how that would work. They only check your boarding pass at the initial security check before the scanners, and the order at which people have their IDs checked is not preserved once you get to the scanners, so you can't track identification that way. On top of that, as someone who's been swabbed multiple times (I'm assuming something to do with my camera equipment), I've never been asked for identification when swabbed. So you might get some DNA to sequence, but you won't really know who it actually is.
Or those pesky 0% interest rates we've had for 7 years.
What countries do you have in mind?
Fantastic! I love reading accident reports, for some reason. There's so much practical knowledge contained in them.